Skip to content
GitLab
Projects
Groups
Snippets
Help
Loading...
Help
Help
Support
Community forum
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Submit feedback
Contribute to GitLab
Sign in / Register
Toggle navigation
C
coq-stdpp
Project overview
Project overview
Details
Activity
Releases
Repository
Repository
Files
Commits
Branches
Tags
Contributors
Graph
Compare
Issues
0
Issues
0
List
Boards
Labels
Service Desk
Milestones
Merge Requests
0
Merge Requests
0
CI / CD
CI / CD
Pipelines
Jobs
Schedules
Operations
Operations
Incidents
Environments
Analytics
Analytics
CI / CD
Repository
Value Stream
Wiki
Wiki
Snippets
Snippets
Members
Members
Collapse sidebar
Close sidebar
Activity
Graph
Create a new issue
Jobs
Commits
Issue Boards
Open sidebar
David Swasey
coq-stdpp
Commits
eecf7526
Commit
eecf7526
authored
Sep 28, 2017
by
Hai Dang
Committed by
Robbert Krebbers
Sep 29, 2017
Browse files
Options
Browse Files
Download
Email Patches
Plain Diff
simplify proofs of gmap filter
parent
c809b3b5
Changes
1
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
1 changed file
with
23 additions
and
44 deletions
+23
-44
theories/gmap.v
theories/gmap.v
+23
-44
No files found.
theories/gmap.v
View file @
eecf7526
...
...
@@ -256,15 +256,8 @@ Section filter.
∀
m
k
,
filter
P
m
!!
k
=
None
↔
m
!!
k
=
None
∨
∀
v
,
m
!!
k
=
Some
v
→
¬
P
(
k
,
v
).
Proof
.
apply
(
map_fold_ind
(
λ
m1
m2
,
∀
k
,
m1
!!
k
=
None
↔
(
m2
!!
k
=
None
∨
∀
v
,
m2
!!
k
=
Some
v
→
¬
P
_
))).
-
naive_solver
.
-
intros
k
v
m
m'
Hm
Eq
k'
.
case_match
;
case
(
decide
(
k'
=
k
))
as
[->|?].
+
rewrite
2
!
lookup_insert
.
naive_solver
.
+
do
2
(
rewrite
lookup_insert_ne
;
[|
auto
]).
by
apply
Eq
.
+
rewrite
Eq
,
Hm
,
lookup_insert
.
naive_solver
.
+
by
rewrite
lookup_insert_ne
.
intros
m
k
.
rewrite
eq_None_not_Some
.
unfold
is_Some
.
setoid_rewrite
gmap_filter_lookup_Some
.
naive_solver
.
Qed
.
Lemma
gmap_filter_dom
m
:
...
...
@@ -274,51 +267,37 @@ Section filter.
destruct
1
as
[?[
Eq
_
]%
gmap_filter_lookup_Some
].
by
eexists
.
Qed
.
Lemma
gmap_filter_lookup_equiv
`
{
Equiv
A
}
`
{
Reflexive
A
(
≡
)}
m1
m2
:
Lemma
gmap_filter_lookup_equiv
m1
m2
:
(
∀
k
v
,
P
(
k
,
v
)
→
m1
!!
k
=
Some
v
↔
m2
!!
k
=
Some
v
)
→
filter
P
m1
≡
filter
P
m2
.
→
filter
P
m1
=
filter
P
m2
.
Proof
.
intros
HP
k
.
destruct
(
filter
P
m1
!!
k
)
as
[
v1
|]
eqn
:
Hv1
;
[
apply
gmap_filter_lookup_Some
in
Hv1
as
[
Hv1
HP1
]
;
specialize
(
HP
k
v1
HP1
)|]
;
destruct
(
filter
P
m2
!!
k
)
as
[
v2
|]
eqn
:
Hv2
.
-
apply
gmap_filter_lookup_Some
in
Hv2
as
[
Hv2
_
].
rewrite
Hv1
,
Hv2
in
HP
.
destruct
HP
as
[
HP
_
].
specialize
(
HP
(
eq_refl
_
))
as
[].
by
apply
option_Forall2_refl
.
-
apply
gmap_filter_lookup_None
in
Hv2
as
[
Hv2
|
Hv2
]
;
[
naive_solver
|
by
apply
HP
,
Hv2
in
Hv1
].
-
apply
gmap_filter_lookup_Some
in
Hv2
as
[
Hv2
HP2
].
specialize
(
HP
k
v2
HP2
).
apply
gmap_filter_lookup_None
in
Hv1
as
[
Hv1
|
Hv1
].
+
rewrite
Hv1
in
HP
.
naive_solver
.
+
by
apply
HP
,
Hv1
in
Hv2
.
-
by
apply
option_Forall2_refl
.
intros
HP
.
apply
map_eq
.
intros
k
.
destruct
(
filter
P
m2
!!
k
)
as
[
v2
|]
eqn
:
Hv2
;
[
apply
gmap_filter_lookup_Some
in
Hv2
as
[
Hv2
HP2
]
;
specialize
(
HP
k
v2
HP2
)
|
apply
gmap_filter_lookup_None
;
right
;
intros
v
EqS
ISP
;
apply
gmap_filter_lookup_None
in
Hv2
as
[
Hv2
|
Hv2
]].
-
apply
gmap_filter_lookup_Some
.
by
rewrite
HP
.
-
specialize
(
HP
_
_
ISP
).
rewrite
HP
,
Hv2
in
EqS
.
naive_solver
.
-
apply
(
Hv2
v
)
;
[
by
apply
HP
|
done
].
Qed
.
Lemma
gmap_filter_lookup_insert
`
{
Equiv
A
}
`
{
Reflexive
A
(
≡
)}
m
k
v
:
P
(
k
,
v
)
→
<[
k
:
=
v
]>
(
filter
P
m
)
≡
filter
P
(<[
k
:
=
v
]>
m
).
Lemma
gmap_filter_lookup_insert
m
k
v
:
P
(
k
,
v
)
→
<[
k
:
=
v
]>
(
filter
P
m
)
=
filter
P
(<[
k
:
=
v
]>
m
).
Proof
.
intros
HP
k'
.
intros
HP
.
apply
map_eq
.
intros
k'
.
case
(
decide
(
k'
=
k
))
as
[->|?]
;
[
rewrite
lookup_insert
|
rewrite
lookup_insert_ne
;
[|
auto
]].
-
destruct
(
filter
P
(<[
k
:
=
v
]>
m
)
!!
k
)
eqn
:
Hk
.
+
apply
gmap_filter_lookup_Some
in
Hk
.
rewrite
lookup_insert
in
Hk
.
destruct
Hk
as
[
Hk
_
].
inversion
Hk
.
by
apply
option_Forall2_refl
.
+
apply
gmap_filter_lookup_None
in
Hk
.
rewrite
lookup_insert
in
Hk
.
destruct
Hk
as
[->|
HNP
].
by
apply
option_Forall2_refl
.
by
specialize
(
HNP
v
(
eq_refl
_
)).
-
symmetry
.
apply
gmap_filter_lookup_Some
.
by
rewrite
lookup_insert
.
-
destruct
(
filter
P
(<[
k
:
=
v
]>
m
)
!!
k'
)
eqn
:
Hk
;
revert
Hk
;
[
rewrite
gmap_filter_lookup_Some
|
rewrite
gmap_filter_lookup_None
]
;
(
rewrite
lookup_insert_ne
;
[|
by
auto
])
;
[
rewrite
<-
gmap_filter_lookup_Some
|
rewrite
<-
gmap_filter_lookup_None
]
;
intros
Hk
;
rewrite
Hk
;
by
apply
option_Forall2_refl
.
[
rewrite
gmap_filter_lookup_Some
,
lookup_insert_ne
;
[|
by
auto
]
;
by
rewrite
<-
gmap_filter_lookup_Some
|
rewrite
gmap_filter_lookup_None
,
lookup_insert_ne
;
[|
auto
]
;
by
rewrite
<-
gmap_filter_lookup_None
]
.
Qed
.
Lemma
gmap_filter_empty
`
{
Equiv
A
}
:
filter
P
(
∅
:
gmap
K
A
)
≡
∅
.
Proof
.
intro
l
.
rewrite
lookup_empty
.
constructor
.
Qed
.
Lemma
gmap_filter_empty
`
{
Equiv
A
}
:
filter
P
(
∅
:
gmap
K
A
)
=
∅
.
Proof
.
apply
map_fold_empty
.
Qed
.
End
filter
.
...
...
Write
Preview
Markdown
is supported
0%
Try again
or
attach a new file
.
Attach a file
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment