From 4b2916c480132c36089a03b585261ad22523fd6e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ralf Jung <jung@mpi-sws.org> Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2016 22:43:34 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Add locking to value-scope notation for lambdas --- heap_lang/derived.v | 10 ++++++---- heap_lang/lib/assert.v | 2 -- heap_lang/lib/barrier/barrier.v | 1 - heap_lang/lib/barrier/proof.v | 2 -- heap_lang/lib/counter.v | 19 +++++++++---------- heap_lang/lib/par.v | 2 -- heap_lang/lib/spawn.v | 1 - heap_lang/lib/spin_lock.v | 1 - heap_lang/lib/ticket_lock.v | 16 ++++++++-------- heap_lang/lifting.v | 6 ------ heap_lang/notation.v | 10 +++++----- heap_lang/wp_tactics.v | 19 +++++++++++++++++-- tests/barrier_client.v | 2 -- tests/counter.v | 2 -- tests/heap_lang.v | 1 - tests/joining_existentials.v | 2 -- tests/list_reverse.v | 1 - tests/one_shot.v | 2 -- tests/tree_sum.v | 3 --- 19 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 57 deletions(-) diff --git a/heap_lang/derived.v b/heap_lang/derived.v index 9a95ee5c8..367f34eaa 100644 --- a/heap_lang/derived.v +++ b/heap_lang/derived.v @@ -17,15 +17,17 @@ Implicit Types P Q : iProp Σ. Implicit Types Φ : val → iProp Σ. (** Proof rules for the sugar *) -Lemma wp_lam E x ef e Φ : - is_Some (to_val e) → Closed (x :b: []) ef → - â–· WP subst' x e ef @ E {{ Φ }} ⊢ WP App (Lam x ef) e @ E {{ Φ }}. +Lemma wp_lam E x elam e1 e2 Φ : + e1 = Lam x elam → + is_Some (to_val e2) → + Closed (x :b: []) elam → + â–· WP subst' x e2 elam @ E {{ Φ }} ⊢ WP App e1 e2 @ E {{ Φ }}. Proof. intros. by rewrite -(wp_rec _ BAnon) //. Qed. Lemma wp_let E x e1 e2 Φ : is_Some (to_val e1) → Closed (x :b: []) e2 → â–· WP subst' x e1 e2 @ E {{ Φ }} ⊢ WP Let x e1 e2 @ E {{ Φ }}. -Proof. apply wp_lam. Qed. +Proof. by apply wp_lam. Qed. Lemma wp_seq E e1 e2 Φ : is_Some (to_val e1) → Closed [] e2 → diff --git a/heap_lang/lib/assert.v b/heap_lang/lib/assert.v index 4de019169..fa9b8cd25 100644 --- a/heap_lang/lib/assert.v +++ b/heap_lang/lib/assert.v @@ -14,5 +14,3 @@ Proof. iIntros "HΦ". rewrite /assert. wp_let. wp_seq. iApply (wp_wand with "HΦ"). iIntros (v) "[% ?]"; subst. by wp_if. Qed. - -Global Opaque assert. diff --git a/heap_lang/lib/barrier/barrier.v b/heap_lang/lib/barrier/barrier.v index f30edf8dd..61f8f7252 100644 --- a/heap_lang/lib/barrier/barrier.v +++ b/heap_lang/lib/barrier/barrier.v @@ -4,4 +4,3 @@ Definition newbarrier : val := λ: <>, ref #false. Definition signal : val := λ: "x", "x" <- #true. Definition wait : val := rec: "wait" "x" := if: !"x" then #() else "wait" "x". -Global Opaque newbarrier signal wait. diff --git a/heap_lang/lib/barrier/proof.v b/heap_lang/lib/barrier/proof.v index b67477be2..2b65b88c7 100644 --- a/heap_lang/lib/barrier/proof.v +++ b/heap_lang/lib/barrier/proof.v @@ -22,8 +22,6 @@ Section proof. Context `{!heapG Σ, !barrierG Σ} (N : namespace). Implicit Types I : gset gname. -Local Transparent newbarrier signal wait. - Definition ress (P : iProp Σ) (I : gset gname) : iProp Σ := (∃ Ψ : gname → iProp Σ, â–· (P -∗ [∗ set] i ∈ I, Ψ i) ∗ [∗ set] i ∈ I, saved_prop_own i (Ψ i))%I. diff --git a/heap_lang/lib/counter.v b/heap_lang/lib/counter.v index 097bd7fb6..72d16f830 100644 --- a/heap_lang/lib/counter.v +++ b/heap_lang/lib/counter.v @@ -4,12 +4,11 @@ From iris.proofmode Require Import tactics. From iris.algebra Require Import frac auth. From iris.heap_lang Require Import proofmode notation. -Definition newcounter : val := locked (λ: <>, ref #0)%V. -Definition incr : val := locked ( - rec: "incr" "l" := +Definition newcounter : val := λ: <>, ref #0. +Definition incr : val := rec: "incr" "l" := let: "n" := !"l" in - if: CAS "l" "n" (#1 + "n") then #() else "incr" "l")%V. -Definition read : val := locked (λ: "l", !"l")%V. + if: CAS "l" "n" (#1 + "n") then #() else "incr" "l". +Definition read : val := λ: "l", !"l". (** Monotone counter *) Class mcounterG Σ := MCounterG { mcounter_inG :> inG Σ (authR mnatUR) }. @@ -36,7 +35,7 @@ Section mono_proof. heapN ⊥ N → {{{ heap_ctx }}} newcounter #() {{{ l, RET #l; mcounter l 0 }}}. Proof. - iIntros (? Φ) "#Hh HΦ". rewrite -wp_fupd /newcounter -lock /=. wp_seq. wp_alloc l as "Hl". + iIntros (? Φ) "#Hh HΦ". rewrite -wp_fupd /newcounter. wp_seq. wp_alloc l as "Hl". iMod (own_alloc (â— (O:mnat) â‹… â—¯ (O:mnat))) as (γ) "[Hγ Hγ']"; first done. iMod (inv_alloc N _ (mcounter_inv γ l) with "[Hl Hγ]"). { iNext. iExists 0%nat. by iFrame. } @@ -72,7 +71,7 @@ Section mono_proof. {{{ mcounter l j }}} read #l {{{ i, RET #i; ⌜j ≤ iâŒ%nat ∧ mcounter l i }}}. Proof. iIntros (Ï•) "Hc HΦ". iDestruct "Hc" as (γ) "(% & #? & #Hinv & Hγf)". - rewrite /read -lock /=. wp_let. iInv N as (c) ">[Hγ Hl]" "Hclose". wp_load. + rewrite /read /=. wp_let. iInv N as (c) ">[Hγ Hl]" "Hclose". wp_load. iDestruct (own_valid_2 with "Hγ Hγf") as %[?%mnat_included _]%auth_valid_discrete_2. iMod (own_update_2 with "Hγ Hγf") as "[Hγ Hγf]". @@ -113,7 +112,7 @@ Section contrib_spec. {{{ heap_ctx }}} newcounter #() {{{ γ l, RET #l; ccounter_ctx γ l ∗ ccounter γ 1 0 }}}. Proof. - iIntros (? Φ) "#Hh HΦ". rewrite -wp_fupd /newcounter -lock /=. wp_seq. wp_alloc l as "Hl". + iIntros (? Φ) "#Hh HΦ". rewrite -wp_fupd /newcounter /=. wp_seq. wp_alloc l as "Hl". iMod (own_alloc (â— (Some (1%Qp, O%nat)) â‹… â—¯ (Some (1%Qp, 0%nat)))) as (γ) "[Hγ Hγ']"; first done. iMod (inv_alloc N _ (ccounter_inv γ l) with "[Hl Hγ]"). @@ -147,7 +146,7 @@ Section contrib_spec. {{{ c, RET #c; ⌜n ≤ câŒ%nat ∧ ccounter γ q n }}}. Proof. iIntros (Φ) "(#(%&?&?) & Hγf) HΦ". - rewrite /read -lock /=. wp_let. iInv N as (c) ">[Hγ Hl]" "Hclose". wp_load. + rewrite /read /=. wp_let. iInv N as (c) ">[Hγ Hl]" "Hclose". wp_load. iDestruct (own_valid_2 with "Hγ Hγf") as %[[? ?%nat_included]%Some_pair_included_total_2 _]%auth_valid_discrete_2. iMod ("Hclose" with "[Hl Hγ]") as "_"; [iNext; iExists c; by iFrame|]. @@ -159,7 +158,7 @@ Section contrib_spec. {{{ n, RET #n; ccounter γ 1 n }}}. Proof. iIntros (Φ) "(#(%&?&?) & Hγf) HΦ". - rewrite /read -lock /=. wp_let. iInv N as (c) ">[Hγ Hl]" "Hclose". wp_load. + rewrite /read /=. wp_let. iInv N as (c) ">[Hγ Hl]" "Hclose". wp_load. iDestruct (own_valid_2 with "Hγ Hγf") as %[Hn _]%auth_valid_discrete_2. apply (Some_included_exclusive _) in Hn as [= ->]%leibniz_equiv; last done. iMod ("Hclose" with "[Hl Hγ]") as "_"; [iNext; iExists c; by iFrame|]. diff --git a/heap_lang/lib/par.v b/heap_lang/lib/par.v index 6b4b310aa..3c15c0cd5 100644 --- a/heap_lang/lib/par.v +++ b/heap_lang/lib/par.v @@ -44,5 +44,3 @@ Proof. iSplitL "H1"; by wp_let. Qed. End proof. - -Global Opaque par. diff --git a/heap_lang/lib/spawn.v b/heap_lang/lib/spawn.v index d424aa7fa..20cbb59b4 100644 --- a/heap_lang/lib/spawn.v +++ b/heap_lang/lib/spawn.v @@ -78,4 +78,3 @@ Qed. End proof. Typeclasses Opaque join_handle. -Global Opaque spawn join. diff --git a/heap_lang/lib/spin_lock.v b/heap_lang/lib/spin_lock.v index 46e8715bc..e9bcad0c6 100644 --- a/heap_lang/lib/spin_lock.v +++ b/heap_lang/lib/spin_lock.v @@ -89,7 +89,6 @@ Section proof. End proof. Typeclasses Opaque is_lock locked. -Global Opaque newlock try_acquire acquire release. Definition spin_lock `{!heapG Σ, !lockG Σ} : lock Σ := {| lock.locked_exclusive := locked_exclusive; lock.newlock_spec := newlock_spec; diff --git a/heap_lang/lib/ticket_lock.v b/heap_lang/lib/ticket_lock.v index 8e16f24ec..e4c691e6b 100644 --- a/heap_lang/lib/ticket_lock.v +++ b/heap_lang/lib/ticket_lock.v @@ -7,24 +7,24 @@ From iris.heap_lang.lib Require Export lock. Import uPred. Definition wait_loop: val := - ssreflect.locked (rec: "wait_loop" "x" "lk" := + rec: "wait_loop" "x" "lk" := let: "o" := !(Fst "lk") in if: "x" = "o" then #() (* my turn *) - else "wait_loop" "x" "lk")%V. + else "wait_loop" "x" "lk". Definition newlock : val := - ssreflect.locked (λ: <>, ((* owner *) ref #0, (* next *) ref #0))%V. + λ: <>, ((* owner *) ref #0, (* next *) ref #0). Definition acquire : val := - ssreflect.locked (rec: "acquire" "lk" := + rec: "acquire" "lk" := let: "n" := !(Snd "lk") in if: CAS (Snd "lk") "n" ("n" + #1) then wait_loop "n" "lk" - else "acquire" "lk")%V. + else "acquire" "lk". Definition release : val := - ssreflect.locked (λ: "lk", (Fst "lk") <- !(Fst "lk") + #1)%V. + λ: "lk", (Fst "lk") <- !(Fst "lk") + #1. (** The CMRAs we need. *) Class tlockG Σ := @@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ Section proof. heapN ⊥ N → {{{ heap_ctx ∗ R }}} newlock #() {{{ lk γ, RET lk; is_lock γ lk R }}}. Proof. - iIntros (HN Φ) "(#Hh & HR) HΦ". rewrite -wp_fupd /newlock. unlock. + iIntros (HN Φ) "(#Hh & HR) HΦ". rewrite -wp_fupd /newlock. wp_seq. wp_alloc lo as "Hlo". wp_alloc ln as "Hln". iMod (own_alloc (â— (Excl' 0%nat, ∅) â‹… â—¯ (Excl' 0%nat, ∅))) as (γ) "[Hγ Hγ']". { by rewrite -auth_both_op. } @@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ Section proof. iIntros (Φ) "(Hl & Hγ & HR) HΦ". iDestruct "Hl" as (lo ln) "(% & #? & % & #?)"; subst. iDestruct "Hγ" as (o) "Hγo". - rewrite /release. unlock. wp_let. wp_proj. wp_proj. wp_bind (! _)%E. + rewrite /release. wp_let. wp_proj. wp_proj. wp_bind (! _)%E. iInv N as (o' n) "(>Hlo & >Hln & >Hauth & Haown)" "Hclose". wp_load. iDestruct (own_valid_2 with "Hauth Hγo") as diff --git a/heap_lang/lifting.v b/heap_lang/lifting.v index 7d45d5501..eb07aaa0b 100644 --- a/heap_lang/lifting.v +++ b/heap_lang/lifting.v @@ -111,12 +111,6 @@ Proof. intros; inv_head_step; eauto. Qed. -Lemma wp_rec_locked E f x erec e1 e2 Φ `{!Closed (f :b: x :b: []) erec} : - e1 = of_val $ locked (RecV f x erec) → - is_Some (to_val e2) → - â–· WP subst' x e2 (subst' f e1 erec) @ E {{ Φ }} ⊢ WP App e1 e2 @ E {{ Φ }}. -Proof. unlock. auto using wp_rec. Qed. - Lemma wp_un_op E op e v v' Φ : to_val e = Some v → un_op_eval op v = Some v' → diff --git a/heap_lang/notation.v b/heap_lang/notation.v index 040c5ae21..bd2bb6ff4 100644 --- a/heap_lang/notation.v +++ b/heap_lang/notation.v @@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ Notation "~ e" := (UnOp NegOp e%E) (at level 75, right associativity) : expr_sco Notation "e1 <- e2" := (Store e1%E e2%E) (at level 80) : expr_scope. Notation "'rec:' f x := e" := (Rec f%bind x%bind e%E) (at level 102, f at level 1, x at level 1, e at level 200) : expr_scope. -Notation "'rec:' f x := e" := (RecV f%bind x%bind e%E) +Notation "'rec:' f x := e" := (locked (RecV f%bind x%bind e%E)) (at level 102, f at level 1, x at level 1, e at level 200) : val_scope. Notation "'if:' e1 'then' e2 'else' e3" := (If e1%E e2%E e3%E) (at level 200, e1, e2, e3 at level 200) : expr_scope. @@ -58,20 +58,20 @@ defined above. This is needed because App is now a coercion, and these notations are otherwise not pretty printed back accordingly. *) Notation "'rec:' f x y := e" := (Rec f%bind x%bind (Lam y%bind e%E)) (at level 102, f, x, y at level 1, e at level 200) : expr_scope. -Notation "'rec:' f x y := e" := (RecV f%bind x%bind (Lam y%bind e%E)) +Notation "'rec:' f x y := e" := (locked (RecV f%bind x%bind (Lam y%bind e%E))) (at level 102, f, x, y at level 1, e at level 200) : val_scope. Notation "'rec:' f x y .. z := e" := (Rec f%bind x%bind (Lam y%bind .. (Lam z%bind e%E) ..)) (at level 102, f, x, y, z at level 1, e at level 200) : expr_scope. -Notation "'rec:' f x y .. z := e" := (RecV f%bind x%bind (Lam y%bind .. (Lam z%bind e%E) ..)) +Notation "'rec:' f x y .. z := e" := (locked (RecV f%bind x%bind (Lam y%bind .. (Lam z%bind e%E) ..))) (at level 102, f, x, y, z at level 1, e at level 200) : val_scope. Notation "λ: x , e" := (Lam x%bind e%E) (at level 102, x at level 1, e at level 200) : expr_scope. Notation "λ: x y .. z , e" := (Lam x%bind (Lam y%bind .. (Lam z%bind e%E) ..)) (at level 102, x, y, z at level 1, e at level 200) : expr_scope. -Notation "λ: x , e" := (LamV x%bind e%E) +Notation "λ: x , e" := (locked (LamV x%bind e%E)) (at level 102, x at level 1, e at level 200) : val_scope. -Notation "λ: x y .. z , e" := (LamV x%bind (Lam y%bind .. (Lam z%bind e%E) .. )) +Notation "λ: x y .. z , e" := (locked (LamV x%bind (Lam y%bind .. (Lam z%bind e%E) .. ))) (at level 102, x, y, z at level 1, e at level 200) : val_scope. Notation "'let:' x := e1 'in' e2" := (Lam x%bind e2%E e1%E) diff --git a/heap_lang/wp_tactics.v b/heap_lang/wp_tactics.v index bc647d8e4..e3250b0d1 100644 --- a/heap_lang/wp_tactics.v +++ b/heap_lang/wp_tactics.v @@ -44,13 +44,28 @@ Tactic Notation "wp_value" := | _ => fail "wp_value: not a wp" end. +(* Applied to goals that are equalities of expressions. Will try to unlock the + LHS once if necessary, to get rid of the lock added by the syntactic sugar. *) +Ltac wp_unlock := + solve [ + reflexivity | (* If there are no locks, this is enough. *) + (* Otherwise, use unification to uncover the lock. *) + (* Step 1: Get the LHS into the form "of_val (locked v)" *) + let v := fresh "v" in + evar (v: val); trans (of_val (locked v)); subst v; first reflexivity; + (* Step 2: Remove the lock from the LHS. *) + etrans; first solve [ apply (f_equal of_val); symmetry; apply lock ]; + (* Now things should be convertible. *) + reflexivity + ]. + Tactic Notation "wp_rec" := lazymatch goal with | |- _ ⊢ wp ?E ?e ?Q => reshape_expr e ltac:(fun K e' => match eval hnf in e' with App ?e1 _ => (* hnf does not reduce through an of_val *) (* match eval hnf in e1 with Rec _ _ _ => *) - wp_bind_core K; etrans; [|(eapply wp_rec; wp_done) || (eapply wp_rec_locked; wp_done)]; simpl_subst; wp_finish + wp_bind_core K; etrans; [|eapply wp_rec; [wp_unlock|wp_done..]]; simpl_subst; wp_finish (* end *) end) || fail "wp_rec: cannot find 'Rec' in" e | _ => fail "wp_rec: not a 'wp'" end. @@ -60,7 +75,7 @@ Tactic Notation "wp_lam" := | |- _ ⊢ wp ?E ?e ?Q => reshape_expr e ltac:(fun K e' => match eval hnf in e' with App ?e1 _ => (* match eval hnf in e1 with Rec BAnon _ _ => *) - wp_bind_core K; etrans; [|eapply wp_lam; wp_done]; simpl_subst; wp_finish + wp_bind_core K; etrans; [|eapply wp_lam; [wp_unlock|wp_done..]]; simpl_subst; wp_finish (* end *) end) || fail "wp_lam: cannot find 'Lam' in" e | _ => fail "wp_lam: not a 'wp'" end. diff --git a/tests/barrier_client.v b/tests/barrier_client.v index 1800ad32c..d9f173c18 100644 --- a/tests/barrier_client.v +++ b/tests/barrier_client.v @@ -54,8 +54,6 @@ Section client. Qed. End client. -Global Opaque worker client. - Section ClosedProofs. Let Σ : gFunctors := #[ heapΣ ; barrierΣ ; spawnΣ ]. diff --git a/tests/counter.v b/tests/counter.v index 4b852ad6d..a97e466e2 100644 --- a/tests/counter.v +++ b/tests/counter.v @@ -136,5 +136,3 @@ Proof. iModIntro; rewrite /C; eauto 10 with omega. Qed. End proof. - -Global Opaque newcounter incr read. diff --git a/tests/heap_lang.v b/tests/heap_lang.v index 1ba0ee98b..60160c224 100644 --- a/tests/heap_lang.v +++ b/tests/heap_lang.v @@ -37,7 +37,6 @@ Section LiftingTests. Definition Pred : val := λ: "x", if: "x" ≤ #0 then -FindPred (-"x" + #2) #0 else FindPred "x" #0. - Global Opaque FindPred Pred. Lemma FindPred_spec n1 n2 E Φ : n1 < n2 → diff --git a/tests/joining_existentials.v b/tests/joining_existentials.v index 700017967..2a143a107 100644 --- a/tests/joining_existentials.v +++ b/tests/joining_existentials.v @@ -97,5 +97,3 @@ Proof. - iIntros (_ v) "[_ H]". iDestruct (Q_res_join with "H") as "?". auto. Qed. End proof. - -Global Opaque client. diff --git a/tests/list_reverse.v b/tests/list_reverse.v index 64565e93f..10cc5bf35 100644 --- a/tests/list_reverse.v +++ b/tests/list_reverse.v @@ -24,7 +24,6 @@ Definition rev : val := "l" <- ("tmp1", "acc");; "rev" "tmp2" "hd" end. -Global Opaque rev. Lemma rev_acc_wp hd acc xs ys (Φ : val → iProp Σ) : heap_ctx ∗ is_list hd xs ∗ is_list acc ys ∗ diff --git a/tests/one_shot.v b/tests/one_shot.v index 323f8896a..0f7b99c73 100644 --- a/tests/one_shot.v +++ b/tests/one_shot.v @@ -96,5 +96,3 @@ Proof. iApply (wp_wand with "Hf2"). by iIntros (v) "#? !# _". Qed. End proof. - -Global Opaque one_shot_example. diff --git a/tests/tree_sum.v b/tests/tree_sum.v index bc216d653..0f3839220 100644 --- a/tests/tree_sum.v +++ b/tests/tree_sum.v @@ -64,6 +64,3 @@ Proof. rewrite Z.add_0_r. iIntros "Hl Ht". wp_seq. wp_load. by iApply "HΦ". Qed. - -Global Opaque sum_loop sum'. - -- GitLab