Skip to content
GitLab
Projects
Groups
Snippets
Help
Loading...
Help
Help
Support
Community forum
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Submit feedback
Contribute to GitLab
Sign in / Register
Toggle navigation
R
rt-proofs
Project overview
Project overview
Details
Activity
Releases
Repository
Repository
Files
Commits
Branches
Tags
Contributors
Graph
Compare
Issues
0
Issues
0
List
Boards
Labels
Service Desk
Milestones
Merge Requests
0
Merge Requests
0
CI / CD
CI / CD
Pipelines
Jobs
Schedules
Operations
Operations
Incidents
Environments
Analytics
Analytics
CI / CD
Repository
Value Stream
Wiki
Wiki
Members
Members
Collapse sidebar
Close sidebar
Activity
Graph
Create a new issue
Jobs
Commits
Issue Boards
Open sidebar
Sophie Quinton
rt-proofs
Commits
6fd564da
Commit
6fd564da
authored
Sep 16, 2016
by
Felipe Cerqueira
Browse files
Options
Browse Files
Download
Email Patches
Plain Diff
Add new lemmas about service
parent
25ef280e
Changes
1
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
1 changed file
with
126 additions
and
3 deletions
+126
-3
model/uni/schedule.v
model/uni/schedule.v
+126
-3
No files found.
model/uni/schedule.v
View file @
6fd564da
...
...
@@ -310,10 +310,133 @@ Module UniprocessorSchedule.
by
rewrite
SCHED1
in
SCHED2
;
inversion
SCHED2
.
Qed
.
End
OnlyOneJobScheduled
.
End
OnlyOneJobScheduled
.
Section
ServiceIsAStepFunction
.
(* First, we show that the service received by any job j
is a step function. *)
Lemma
service_is_a_step_function
:
forall
j
,
is_step_function
(
service
sched
j
).
Proof
.
unfold
is_step_function
,
service
,
service_during
;
intros
j
t
.
rewrite
addn1
big_nat_recr
//=.
by
apply
leq_add
;
last
by
apply
leq_b1
.
Qed
.
(* Next, consider any job j at any time t... *)
Variable
j
:
JobIn
arr_seq
.
Variable
t
:
time
.
(* ...and let s0 be any value less than the service received
by job j by time t. *)
Variable
s0
:
time
.
Hypothesis
H_less_than_s
:
s0
<
service
sched
j
t
.
(* Then, we show that there exists an earlier time t0 where
job j had s0 units of service. *)
Corollary
exists_intermediate_service
:
exists
t0
,
t0
<
t
/\
service
sched
j
t0
=
s0
.
Proof
.
feed
(
exists_intermediate_point
(
service
sched
j
))
;
[
by
apply
service_is_a_step_function
|
intros
EX
].
feed
(
EX
0
t
)
;
first
by
done
.
feed
(
EX
s0
)
;
first
by
rewrite
/
service
/
service_during
big_geq
//.
by
move
:
EX
=>
/=
[
x_mid
EX
]
;
exists
x_mid
.
Qed
.
End
ServiceIsAStepFunction
.
Section
ServiceNotZero
.
(* Let j be any job. *)
Variable
j
:
JobIn
arr_seq
.
(* Assume that the service received by j during [t1, t2) is not zero. *)
Variable
t1
t2
:
time
.
Hypothesis
H_service_not_zero
:
service_during
sched
j
t1
t2
>
0
.
(* Then, there must be a time t where job j is scheduled. *)
Lemma
cumulative_service_implies_scheduled
:
exists
t
,
t1
<=
t
<
t2
/\
scheduled_at
sched
j
t
.
Proof
.
rename
H_service_not_zero
into
NONZERO
.
case
(
boolP
([
exists
t
:
'
I_t2
,
(
t
>=
t1
)
&&
(
service_at
sched
j
t
!=
0
)]))
=>
[
EX
|
ALL
].
{
move
:
EX
=>
/
existsP
[
x
/
andP
[
GE
SERV
]].
rewrite
eqb0
negbK
in
SERV
.
exists
x
;
split
;
last
by
done
.
by
apply
/
andP
;
split
;
last
by
apply
ltn_ord
.
}
{
rewrite
negb_exists
in
ALL
;
move
:
ALL
=>
/
forallP
ALL
.
rewrite
/
service_during
big_nat_cond
in
NONZERO
.
rewrite
big1
?ltn0
//
in
NONZERO
.
intros
i
;
rewrite
andbT
;
move
=>
/
andP
[
GT
LT
].
specialize
(
ALL
(
Ordinal
LT
))
;
simpl
in
ALL
.
by
rewrite
GT
andTb
negbK
in
ALL
;
apply
/
eqP
.
}
Qed
.
End
ServiceNotZero
.
(* In this section, we prove some lemmas about time instants
with same service. *)
Section
TimesWithSameService
.
(* Let j be any job in the arrival sequence. *)
Variable
j
:
JobIn
arr_seq
.
(* Consider any time instants t1 and t2... *)
Variable
t1
t2
:
time
.
(* ...where job j has received the same amount of service. *)
Hypothesis
H_same_service
:
service
sched
j
t1
=
service
sched
j
t2
.
(* First, we show that job j is scheduled at some point t < t1 iff
j is scheduled at some point t' < t2. *)
Lemma
same_service_implies_scheduled_at_earlier_times
:
[
exists
t
:
'
I_t1
,
scheduled_at
sched
j
t
]
=
[
exists
t'
:
'
I_t2
,
scheduled_at
sched
j
t'
].
Proof
.
rename
H_same_service
into
SERV
.
move
:
t1
t2
SERV
;
clear
t1
t2
;
move
=>
t
t'
.
wlog
:
t
t'
/
(
t
<=
t'
)
=>
[
EX
SAME
|
LE
SERV
].
by
case
/
orP
:
(
leq_total
t
t'
)
;
ins
;
[|
symmetry
]
;
apply
EX
.
apply
/
idP
/
idP
;
move
=>
/
existsP
[
t0
SCHED
].
{
have
LT0
:
t0
<
t'
by
apply
:
(
leq_trans
_
LE
).
by
apply
/
existsP
;
exists
(
Ordinal
LT0
).
}
{
destruct
(
ltnP
t0
t
)
as
[
LT01
|
LE10
]
;
first
by
apply
/
existsP
;
exists
(
Ordinal
LT01
).
exfalso
;
move
:
SERV
=>
/
eqP
SERV
.
rewrite
-[
_
==
_
]
negbK
in
SERV
.
move
:
SERV
=>
/
negP
BUG
;
apply
BUG
;
clear
BUG
.
rewrite
neq_ltn
;
apply
/
orP
;
left
.
rewrite
/
service
/
service_during
.
rewrite
->
big_cat_nat
with
(
n
:
=
t0
)
(
p
:
=
t'
)
;
[
simpl
|
by
done
|
by
apply
ltnW
].
rewrite
-
addn1
;
apply
leq_add
;
first
by
apply
extend_sum
.
destruct
t0
as
[
t0
LT
]
;
simpl
in
*.
destruct
t'
;
first
by
rewrite
ltn0
in
LT
.
rewrite
big_nat_recl
;
last
by
done
.
by
rewrite
/
service_at
SCHED
.
}
Qed
.
End
TimesWithSameService
.
End
Lemmas
.
End
Schedule
.
End
UniprocessorSchedule
.
\ No newline at end of file
End
UniprocessorSchedule
.
Write
Preview
Markdown
is supported
0%
Try again
or
attach a new file
.
Attach a file
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment