From iris.program_logic Require Export weakestpre total_weakestpre. From iris.proofmode Require Import coq_tactics. From iris.proofmode Require Export tactics. From iris.heap_lang Require Export tactics lifting. Set Default Proof Using "Type". Import uPred. Lemma tac_wp_expr_eval `{heapG Σ} Δ s E Φ e e' : e = e' → envs_entails Δ (WP e' @ s; E {{ Φ }}) → envs_entails Δ (WP e @ s; E {{ Φ }}). Proof. by intros ->. Qed. Lemma tac_twp_expr_eval `{heapG Σ} Δ s E Φ e e' : e = e' → envs_entails Δ (WP e' @ s; E [{ Φ }]) → envs_entails Δ (WP e @ s; E [{ Φ }]). Proof. by intros ->. Qed. Tactic Notation "wp_expr_eval" tactic(t) := try iStartProof; try (first [eapply tac_wp_expr_eval|eapply tac_twp_expr_eval]; [t; reflexivity|]). Ltac wp_expr_simpl := wp_expr_eval simpl. Ltac wp_expr_simpl_subst := wp_expr_eval simpl_subst. Lemma tac_wp_pure `{heapG Σ} Δ Δ' s E e1 e2 φ Φ : PureExec φ e1 e2 → φ → IntoLaterNEnvs 1 Δ Δ' → envs_entails Δ' (WP e2 @ s; E {{ Φ }}) → envs_entails Δ (WP e1 @ s; E {{ Φ }}). Proof. rewrite /envs_entails=> ??? HΔ'. rewrite into_laterN_env_sound /=. rewrite HΔ' -lifting.wp_pure_step_later //. Qed. Lemma tac_twp_pure `{heapG Σ} Δ s E e1 e2 φ Φ : PureExec φ e1 e2 → φ → envs_entails Δ (WP e2 @ s; E [{ Φ }]) → envs_entails Δ (WP e1 @ s; E [{ Φ }]). Proof. rewrite /envs_entails=> ?? ->. rewrite -total_lifting.twp_pure_step //. Qed. Lemma tac_wp_value `{heapG Σ} Δ s E Φ e v : IntoVal e v → envs_entails Δ (Φ v) → envs_entails Δ (WP e @ s; E {{ Φ }}). Proof. rewrite /envs_entails=> ? ->. by apply wp_value. Qed. Lemma tac_twp_value `{heapG Σ} Δ s E Φ e v : IntoVal e v → envs_entails Δ (Φ v) → envs_entails Δ (WP e @ s; E [{ Φ }]). Proof. rewrite /envs_entails=> ? ->. by apply twp_value. Qed. Ltac wp_value_head := first [eapply tac_wp_value || eapply tac_twp_value]; [apply _ |iEval (lazy beta; simpl of_val)]. Tactic Notation "wp_pure" open_constr(efoc) := iStartProof; lazymatch goal with | |- envs_entails _ (wp ?s ?E ?e ?Q) => let e := eval simpl in e in reshape_expr e ltac:(fun K e' => unify e' efoc; eapply (tac_wp_pure _ _ _ _ (fill K e')); [apply _ (* PureExec *) |try fast_done (* The pure condition for PureExec *) |apply _ (* IntoLaters *) |wp_expr_simpl_subst; try wp_value_head (* new goal *) ]) || fail "wp_pure: cannot find" efoc "in" e "or" efoc "is not a reduct" | |- envs_entails _ (twp ?s ?E ?e ?Q) => let e := eval simpl in e in reshape_expr e ltac:(fun K e' => unify e' efoc; eapply (tac_twp_pure _ _ _ (fill K e')); [apply _ (* PureExec *) |try fast_done (* The pure condition for PureExec *) |wp_expr_simpl_subst; try wp_value_head (* new goal *) ]) || fail "wp_pure: cannot find" efoc "in" e "or" efoc "is not a reduct" | _ => fail "wp_pure: not a 'wp'" end. Tactic Notation "wp_if" := wp_pure (If _ _ _). Tactic Notation "wp_if_true" := wp_pure (If (Lit (LitBool true)) _ _). Tactic Notation "wp_if_false" := wp_pure (If (Lit (LitBool false)) _ _). Tactic Notation "wp_unop" := wp_pure (UnOp _ _). Tactic Notation "wp_binop" := wp_pure (BinOp _ _ _). Tactic Notation "wp_op" := wp_unop || wp_binop. Tactic Notation "wp_rec" := wp_pure (App _ _). Tactic Notation "wp_lam" := wp_rec. Tactic Notation "wp_let" := wp_lam. Tactic Notation "wp_seq" := wp_lam. Tactic Notation "wp_proj" := wp_pure (Fst _) || wp_pure (Snd _). Tactic Notation "wp_case" := wp_pure (Case _ _ _). Tactic Notation "wp_match" := wp_case; wp_let. Lemma tac_wp_bind `{heapG Σ} K Δ s E Φ e f : f = (λ e, fill K e) → (* as an eta expanded hypothesis so that we can `simpl` it *) envs_entails Δ (WP e @ s; E {{ v, WP f (of_val v) @ s; E {{ Φ }} }})%I → envs_entails Δ (WP fill K e @ s; E {{ Φ }}). Proof. rewrite /envs_entails=> -> ->. by apply: wp_bind. Qed. Lemma tac_twp_bind `{heapG Σ} K Δ s E Φ e f : f = (λ e, fill K e) → (* as an eta expanded hypothesis so that we can `simpl` it *) envs_entails Δ (WP e @ s; E [{ v, WP f (of_val v) @ s; E [{ Φ }] }])%I → envs_entails Δ (WP fill K e @ s; E [{ Φ }]). Proof. rewrite /envs_entails=> -> ->. by apply: twp_bind. Qed. Ltac wp_bind_core K := lazymatch eval hnf in K with | [] => idtac | _ => eapply (tac_wp_bind K); [simpl; reflexivity|lazy beta] end. Ltac twp_bind_core K := lazymatch eval hnf in K with | [] => idtac | _ => eapply (tac_twp_bind K); [simpl; reflexivity|lazy beta] end. Tactic Notation "wp_bind" open_constr(efoc) := iStartProof; lazymatch goal with | |- envs_entails _ (wp ?s ?E ?e ?Q) => reshape_expr e ltac:(fun K e' => unify e' efoc; wp_bind_core K) || fail "wp_bind: cannot find" efoc "in" e | |- envs_entails _ (twp ?s ?E ?e ?Q) => reshape_expr e ltac:(fun K e' => unify e' efoc; twp_bind_core K) || fail "wp_bind: cannot find" efoc "in" e | _ => fail "wp_bind: not a 'wp'" end. (** Heap tactics *) Section heap. Context `{heapG Σ}. Implicit Types P Q : iProp Σ. Implicit Types Φ : val → iProp Σ. Implicit Types Δ : envs (uPredI (iResUR Σ)). Lemma tac_wp_alloc Δ Δ' s E j K e v Φ : IntoVal e v → IntoLaterNEnvs 1 Δ Δ' → (∀ l, ∃ Δ'', envs_app false (Esnoc Enil j (l ↦ v)) Δ' = Some Δ'' ∧ envs_entails Δ'' (WP fill K (Lit (LitLoc l)) @ s; E {{ Φ }})) → envs_entails Δ (WP fill K (Alloc e) @ s; E {{ Φ }}). Proof. rewrite /envs_entails=> ?? HΔ. rewrite -wp_bind. eapply wand_apply; first exact: wp_alloc. rewrite left_id into_laterN_env_sound; apply later_mono, forall_intro=> l. destruct (HΔ l) as (Δ''&?&HΔ'). rewrite envs_app_sound //; simpl. by rewrite right_id HΔ'. Qed. Lemma tac_twp_alloc Δ s E j K e v Φ : IntoVal e v → (∀ l, ∃ Δ', envs_app false (Esnoc Enil j (l ↦ v)) Δ = Some Δ' ∧ envs_entails Δ' (WP fill K (Lit (LitLoc l)) @ s; E [{ Φ }])) → envs_entails Δ (WP fill K (Alloc e) @ s; E [{ Φ }]). Proof. rewrite /envs_entails=> ? HΔ. rewrite -twp_bind. eapply wand_apply; first exact: twp_alloc. rewrite left_id. apply forall_intro=> l. destruct (HΔ l) as (Δ'&?&HΔ'). rewrite envs_app_sound //; simpl. by rewrite right_id HΔ'. Qed. Lemma tac_wp_load Δ Δ' s E i K l q v Φ : IntoLaterNEnvs 1 Δ Δ' → envs_lookup i Δ' = Some (false, l ↦{q} v)%I → envs_entails Δ' (WP fill K (of_val v) @ s; E {{ Φ }}) → envs_entails Δ (WP fill K (Load (Lit (LitLoc l))) @ s; E {{ Φ }}). Proof. rewrite /envs_entails=> ???. rewrite -wp_bind. eapply wand_apply; first exact: wp_load. rewrite into_laterN_env_sound -later_sep envs_lookup_split //; simpl. by apply later_mono, sep_mono_r, wand_mono. Qed. Lemma tac_twp_load Δ s E i K l q v Φ : envs_lookup i Δ = Some (false, l ↦{q} v)%I → envs_entails Δ (WP fill K (of_val v) @ s; E [{ Φ }]) → envs_entails Δ (WP fill K (Load (Lit (LitLoc l))) @ s; E [{ Φ }]). Proof. rewrite /envs_entails=> ??. rewrite -twp_bind. eapply wand_apply; first exact: twp_load. rewrite envs_lookup_split //; simpl. by apply sep_mono_r, wand_mono. Qed. Lemma tac_wp_store Δ Δ' Δ'' s E i K l v e v' Φ : IntoVal e v' → IntoLaterNEnvs 1 Δ Δ' → envs_lookup i Δ' = Some (false, l ↦ v)%I → envs_simple_replace i false (Esnoc Enil i (l ↦ v')) Δ' = Some Δ'' → envs_entails Δ'' (WP fill K (Lit LitUnit) @ s; E {{ Φ }}) → envs_entails Δ (WP fill K (Store (Lit (LitLoc l)) e) @ s; E {{ Φ }}). Proof. rewrite /envs_entails=> ?????. rewrite -wp_bind. eapply wand_apply; first by eapply wp_store. rewrite into_laterN_env_sound -later_sep envs_simple_replace_sound //; simpl. rewrite right_id. by apply later_mono, sep_mono_r, wand_mono. Qed. Lemma tac_twp_store Δ Δ' s E i K l v e v' Φ : IntoVal e v' → envs_lookup i Δ = Some (false, l ↦ v)%I → envs_simple_replace i false (Esnoc Enil i (l ↦ v')) Δ = Some Δ' → envs_entails Δ' (WP fill K (Lit LitUnit) @ s; E [{ Φ }]) → envs_entails Δ (WP fill K (Store (Lit (LitLoc l)) e) @ s; E [{ Φ }]). Proof. intros. rewrite -twp_bind. eapply wand_apply; first by eapply twp_store. rewrite envs_simple_replace_sound //; simpl. rewrite right_id. by apply sep_mono_r, wand_mono. Qed. Lemma tac_wp_cas_fail Δ Δ' s E i K l q v e1 v1 e2 Φ : IntoVal e1 v1 → AsVal e2 → IntoLaterNEnvs 1 Δ Δ' → envs_lookup i Δ' = Some (false, l ↦{q} v)%I → v ≠ v1 → envs_entails Δ' (WP fill K (Lit (LitBool false)) @ s; E {{ Φ }}) → envs_entails Δ (WP fill K (CAS (Lit (LitLoc l)) e1 e2) @ s; E {{ Φ }}). Proof. rewrite /envs_entails=> ??????. rewrite -wp_bind. eapply wand_apply; first exact: wp_cas_fail. rewrite into_laterN_env_sound -later_sep envs_lookup_split //; simpl. by apply later_mono, sep_mono_r, wand_mono. Qed. Lemma tac_twp_cas_fail Δ s E i K l q v e1 v1 e2 Φ : IntoVal e1 v1 → AsVal e2 → envs_lookup i Δ = Some (false, l ↦{q} v)%I → v ≠ v1 → envs_entails Δ (WP fill K (Lit (LitBool false)) @ s; E [{ Φ }]) → envs_entails Δ (WP fill K (CAS (Lit (LitLoc l)) e1 e2) @ s; E [{ Φ }]). Proof. intros. rewrite -twp_bind. eapply wand_apply; first exact: twp_cas_fail. rewrite envs_lookup_split //; simpl. by apply sep_mono_r, wand_mono. Qed. Lemma tac_wp_cas_suc Δ Δ' Δ'' s E i K l v e1 v1 e2 v2 Φ : IntoVal e1 v1 → IntoVal e2 v2 → IntoLaterNEnvs 1 Δ Δ' → envs_lookup i Δ' = Some (false, l ↦ v)%I → v = v1 → envs_simple_replace i false (Esnoc Enil i (l ↦ v2)) Δ' = Some Δ'' → envs_entails Δ'' (WP fill K (Lit (LitBool true)) @ s; E {{ Φ }}) → envs_entails Δ (WP fill K (CAS (Lit (LitLoc l)) e1 e2) @ s; E {{ Φ }}). Proof. rewrite /envs_entails=> ???????; subst. rewrite -wp_bind. eapply wand_apply; first exact: wp_cas_suc. rewrite into_laterN_env_sound -later_sep envs_simple_replace_sound //; simpl. rewrite right_id. by apply later_mono, sep_mono_r, wand_mono. Qed. Lemma tac_twp_cas_suc Δ Δ' s E i K l v e1 v1 e2 v2 Φ : IntoVal e1 v1 → IntoVal e2 v2 → envs_lookup i Δ = Some (false, l ↦ v)%I → v = v1 → envs_simple_replace i false (Esnoc Enil i (l ↦ v2)) Δ = Some Δ' → envs_entails Δ' (WP fill K (Lit (LitBool true)) @ s; E [{ Φ }]) → envs_entails Δ (WP fill K (CAS (Lit (LitLoc l)) e1 e2) @ s; E [{ Φ }]). Proof. intros; subst. rewrite -twp_bind. eapply wand_apply; first exact: twp_cas_suc. rewrite envs_simple_replace_sound //; simpl. rewrite right_id. by apply sep_mono_r, wand_mono. Qed. Lemma tac_wp_faa Δ Δ' Δ'' s E i K l i1 e2 i2 Φ : IntoVal e2 (LitV (LitInt i2)) → IntoLaterNEnvs 1 Δ Δ' → envs_lookup i Δ' = Some (false, l ↦ LitV (LitInt i1))%I → envs_simple_replace i false (Esnoc Enil i (l ↦ LitV (LitInt (i1 + i2)))) Δ' = Some Δ'' → envs_entails Δ'' (WP fill K (Lit (LitInt i1)) @ s; E {{ Φ }}) → envs_entails Δ (WP fill K (FAA (Lit (LitLoc l)) e2) @ s; E {{ Φ }}). Proof. rewrite /envs_entails=> ?????; subst. rewrite -wp_bind. eapply wand_apply; first exact: (wp_faa _ _ _ i1 _ i2). rewrite into_laterN_env_sound -later_sep envs_simple_replace_sound //; simpl. rewrite right_id. by apply later_mono, sep_mono_r, wand_mono. Qed. Lemma tac_twp_faa Δ Δ' s E i K l i1 e2 i2 Φ : IntoVal e2 (LitV (LitInt i2)) → envs_lookup i Δ = Some (false, l ↦ LitV (LitInt i1))%I → envs_simple_replace i false (Esnoc Enil i (l ↦ LitV (LitInt (i1 + i2)))) Δ = Some Δ' → envs_entails Δ' (WP fill K (Lit (LitInt i1)) @ s; E [{ Φ }]) → envs_entails Δ (WP fill K (FAA (Lit (LitLoc l)) e2) @ s; E [{ Φ }]). Proof. rewrite /envs_entails=> ????; subst. rewrite -twp_bind. eapply wand_apply; first exact: (twp_faa _ _ _ i1 _ i2). rewrite envs_simple_replace_sound //; simpl. rewrite right_id. by apply sep_mono_r, wand_mono. Qed. End heap. Tactic Notation "wp_apply" open_constr(lem) := iPoseProofCore lem as false true (fun H => lazymatch goal with | |- envs_entails _ (wp ?s ?E ?e ?Q) => reshape_expr e ltac:(fun K e' => wp_bind_core K; iApplyHyp H; try iNext; wp_expr_simpl) || lazymatch iTypeOf H with | Some (_,?P) => fail "wp_apply: cannot apply" P end | |- envs_entails _ (twp ?s ?E ?e ?Q) => reshape_expr e ltac:(fun K e' => twp_bind_core K; iApplyHyp H; wp_expr_simpl) || lazymatch iTypeOf H with | Some (_,?P) => fail "wp_apply: cannot apply" P end | _ => fail "wp_apply: not a 'wp'" end). Tactic Notation "wp_alloc" ident(l) "as" constr(H) := let finish _ := first [intros l | fail 1 "wp_alloc:" l "not fresh"]; eexists; split; [env_cbv; reflexivity || fail "wp_alloc:" H "not fresh" |wp_expr_simpl; try wp_value_head] in iStartProof; lazymatch goal with | |- envs_entails _ (wp ?s ?E ?e ?Q) => first [reshape_expr e ltac:(fun K e' => eapply (tac_wp_alloc _ _ _ _ H K); [apply _|..]) |fail 1 "wp_alloc: cannot find 'Alloc' in" e]; [apply _ |finish ()] | |- envs_entails _ (twp ?s ?E ?e ?Q) => first [reshape_expr e ltac:(fun K e' => eapply (tac_twp_alloc _ _ _ H K); [apply _|..]) |fail 1 "wp_alloc: cannot find 'Alloc' in" e]; finish () | _ => fail "wp_alloc: not a 'wp'" end. Tactic Notation "wp_alloc" ident(l) := let H := iFresh in wp_alloc l as H. Tactic Notation "wp_load" := let solve_mapsto _ := let l := match goal with |- _ = Some (_, (?l ↦{_} _)%I) => l end in iAssumptionCore || fail "wp_load: cannot find" l "↦ ?" in iStartProof; lazymatch goal with | |- envs_entails _ (wp ?s ?E ?e ?Q) => first [reshape_expr e ltac:(fun K e' => eapply (tac_wp_load _ _ _ _ _ K)) |fail 1 "wp_load: cannot find 'Load' in" e]; [apply _ |solve_mapsto () |wp_expr_simpl; try wp_value_head] | |- envs_entails _ (twp ?s ?E ?e ?Q) => first [reshape_expr e ltac:(fun K e' => eapply (tac_twp_load _ _ _ _ K)) |fail 1 "wp_load: cannot find 'Load' in" e]; [solve_mapsto () |wp_expr_simpl; try wp_value_head] | _ => fail "wp_load: not a 'wp'" end. Tactic Notation "wp_store" := let solve_mapsto _ := let l := match goal with |- _ = Some (_, (?l ↦{_} _)%I) => l end in iAssumptionCore || fail "wp_store: cannot find" l "↦ ?" in let finish _ := wp_expr_simpl; try first [wp_pure (Seq (Lit LitUnit) _)|wp_value_head] in iStartProof; lazymatch goal with | |- envs_entails _ (wp ?s ?E ?e ?Q) => first [reshape_expr e ltac:(fun K e' => eapply (tac_wp_store _ _ _ _ _ _ K); [apply _|..]) |fail 1 "wp_store: cannot find 'Store' in" e]; [apply _ |solve_mapsto () |env_cbv; reflexivity |finish ()] | |- envs_entails _ (twp ?s ?E ?e ?Q) => first [reshape_expr e ltac:(fun K e' => eapply (tac_twp_store _ _ _ _ _ K); [apply _|..]) |fail 1 "wp_store: cannot find 'Store' in" e]; [solve_mapsto () |env_cbv; reflexivity |finish ()] | _ => fail "wp_store: not a 'wp'" end. Tactic Notation "wp_cas_fail" := let solve_mapsto _ := let l := match goal with |- _ = Some (_, (?l ↦{_} _)%I) => l end in iAssumptionCore || fail "wp_cas_fail: cannot find" l "↦ ?" in iStartProof; lazymatch goal with | |- envs_entails _ (wp ?s ?E ?e ?Q) => first [reshape_expr e ltac:(fun K e' => eapply (tac_wp_cas_fail _ _ _ _ _ K); [apply _|apply _|..]) |fail 1 "wp_cas_fail: cannot find 'CAS' in" e]; [apply _ |solve_mapsto () |try congruence |simpl; try wp_value_head] | |- envs_entails _ (twp ?s ?E ?e ?Q) => first [reshape_expr e ltac:(fun K e' => eapply (tac_twp_cas_fail _ _ _ _ K); [apply _|apply _|..]) |fail 1 "wp_cas_fail: cannot find 'CAS' in" e]; [solve_mapsto () |try congruence |wp_expr_simpl; try wp_value_head] | _ => fail "wp_cas_fail: not a 'wp'" end. Tactic Notation "wp_cas_suc" := let solve_mapsto _ := let l := match goal with |- _ = Some (_, (?l ↦{_} _)%I) => l end in iAssumptionCore || fail "wp_cas_suc: cannot find" l "↦ ?" in iStartProof; lazymatch goal with | |- envs_entails _ (wp ?s ?E ?e ?Q) => first [reshape_expr e ltac:(fun K e' => eapply (tac_wp_cas_suc _ _ _ _ _ _ K); [apply _|apply _|..]) |fail 1 "wp_cas_suc: cannot find 'CAS' in" e]; [apply _ |solve_mapsto () |try congruence |env_cbv; reflexivity |simpl; try wp_value_head] | |- envs_entails _ (twp ?E ?e ?Q) => first [reshape_expr e ltac:(fun K e' => eapply (tac_twp_cas_suc _ _ _ _ _ K); [apply _|apply _|..]) |fail 1 "wp_cas_suc: cannot find 'CAS' in" e]; [solve_mapsto () |try congruence |env_cbv; reflexivity |wp_expr_simpl; try wp_value_head] | _ => fail "wp_cas_suc: not a 'wp'" end. Tactic Notation "wp_faa" := let solve_mapsto _ := let l := match goal with |- _ = Some (_, (?l ↦{_} _)%I) => l end in iAssumptionCore || fail "wp_cas_suc: cannot find" l "↦ ?" in iStartProof; lazymatch goal with | |- envs_entails _ (wp ?s ?E ?e ?Q) => first [reshape_expr e ltac:(fun K e' => eapply (tac_wp_faa _ _ _ _ _ _ K); [apply _|..]) |fail 1 "wp_faa: cannot find 'CAS' in" e]; [apply _ |solve_mapsto () |env_cbv; reflexivity |wp_expr_simpl; try wp_value_head] | |- envs_entails _ (twp ?s ?E ?e ?Q) => first [reshape_expr e ltac:(fun K e' => eapply (tac_twp_faa _ _ _ _ _ K); [apply _|..]) |fail 1 "wp_faa: cannot find 'CAS' in" e]; [solve_mapsto () |env_cbv; reflexivity |wp_expr_simpl; try wp_value_head] | _ => fail "wp_faa: not a 'wp'" end.