fin_maps.v 66 KB
Newer Older
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
1
(* Copyright (c) 2012-2015, Robbert Krebbers. *)
2
3
4
(* This file is distributed under the terms of the BSD license. *)
(** Finite maps associate data to keys. This file defines an interface for
finite maps and collects some theory on it. Most importantly, it proves useful
5
6
induction principles for finite maps and implements the tactic
[simplify_map_equality] to simplify goals involving finite maps. *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
7
Require Import Permutation.
8
9
Require Export ars vector orders.

10
11
(** * Axiomatization of finite maps *)
(** We require Leibniz equality to be extensional on finite maps. This of
12
13
14
15
16
course limits the space of finite map implementations, but since we are mainly
interested in finite maps with numbers as indexes, we do not consider this to
be a serious limitation. The main application of finite maps is to implement
the memory, where extensionality of Leibniz equality is very important for a
convenient use in the assertions of our axiomatic semantics. *)
17

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
18
19
(** Finiteness is axiomatized by requiring that each map can be translated
to an association list. The translation to association lists is used to
20
prove well founded recursion on finite maps. *)
21

22
23
24
(** Finite map implementations are required to implement the [merge] function
which enables us to give a generic implementation of [union_with],
[intersection_with], and [difference_with]. *)
25

26
Class FinMapToList K A M := map_to_list: M  list (K * A).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
27

28
29
30
Class FinMap K M `{FMap M,  A, Lookup K A (M A),  A, Empty (M A),  A,
    PartialAlter K A (M A), OMap M, Merge M,  A, FinMapToList K A (M A),
     i j : K, Decision (i = j)} := {
31
32
  map_eq {A} (m1 m2 : M A) : ( i, m1 !! i = m2 !! i)  m1 = m2;
  lookup_empty {A} i : ( : M A) !! i = None;
33
34
35
36
  lookup_partial_alter {A} f (m : M A) i :
    partial_alter f i m !! i = f (m !! i);
  lookup_partial_alter_ne {A} f (m : M A) i j :
    i  j  partial_alter f i m !! j = m !! j;
37
  lookup_fmap {A B} (f : A  B) (m : M A) i : (f <$> m) !! i = f <$> m !! i;
38
  NoDup_map_to_list {A} (m : M A) : NoDup (map_to_list m);
39
40
  elem_of_map_to_list {A} (m : M A) i x :
    (i,x)  map_to_list m  m !! i = Some x;
41
  lookup_omap {A B} (f : A  option B) m i : omap f m !! i = m !! i = f;
42
43
44
  lookup_merge {A B C} (f : option A  option B  option C)
      `{!PropHolds (f None None = None)} m1 m2 i :
    merge f m1 m2 !! i = f (m1 !! i) (m2 !! i)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
45
46
}.

47
48
49
(** * Derived operations *)
(** All of the following functions are defined in a generic way for arbitrary
finite map implementations. These generic implementations do not cause a
50
51
significant performance loss to make including them in the finite map interface
worthwhile. *)
52
53
54
55
56
Instance map_insert `{PartialAlter K A M} : Insert K A M :=
  λ i x, partial_alter (λ _, Some x) i.
Instance map_alter `{PartialAlter K A M} : Alter K A M :=
  λ f, partial_alter (fmap f).
Instance map_delete `{PartialAlter K A M} : Delete K M :=
57
  partial_alter (λ _, None).
58
59
Instance map_singleton `{PartialAlter K A M, Empty M} :
  Singleton (K * A) M := λ p, <[p.1:=p.2]> .
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
60

61
Definition map_of_list `{Insert K A M, Empty M} : list (K * A)  M :=
62
  fold_right (λ p, <[p.1:=p.2]>) .
63
64
65
Definition map_of_collection `{Elements K C, Insert K A M, Empty M}
    (f : K  option A) (X : C) : M :=
  map_of_list (omap (λ i, (i,) <$> f i) (elements X)).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
66

67
68
69
70
71
72
Instance map_union_with `{Merge M} {A} : UnionWith A (M A) :=
  λ f, merge (union_with f).
Instance map_intersection_with `{Merge M} {A} : IntersectionWith A (M A) :=
  λ f, merge (intersection_with f).
Instance map_difference_with `{Merge M} {A} : DifferenceWith A (M A) :=
  λ f, merge (difference_with f).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
73

74
75
(** The relation [intersection_forall R] on finite maps describes that the
relation [R] holds for each pair in the intersection. *)
76
Definition map_Forall `{Lookup K A M} (P : K  A  Prop) : M  Prop :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
77
  λ m,  i x, m !! i = Some x  P i x.
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
Definition map_Forall2 `{ A, Lookup K A (M A)} {A B}
    (R : A  B  Prop) (P : A  Prop) (Q : B  Prop)
    (m1 : M A) (m2 : M B) : Prop :=  i,
  match m1 !! i, m2 !! i with
  | Some x, Some y => R x y
  | Some x, None => P x
  | None, Some y => Q y
  | None, None => True
  end.
87
88
Definition map_included `{ A, Lookup K A (M A)} {A}
  (R : relation A) : relation (M A) := map_Forall2 R (λ _, False) (λ _, True).
89
90
91
92
Instance map_disjoint `{ A, Lookup K A (M A)} {A} : Disjoint (M A) :=
  map_Forall2 (λ _ _, False) (λ _, True) (λ _, True).
Instance map_subseteq `{ A, Lookup K A (M A)} {A} : SubsetEq (M A) :=
  map_Forall2 (=) (λ _, False) (λ _, True).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
93
94
95
96
97

(** The union of two finite maps only has a meaningful definition for maps
that are disjoint. However, as working with partial functions is inconvenient
in Coq, we define the union as a total function. In case both finite maps
have a value at the same index, we take the value of the first map. *)
98
Instance map_union `{Merge M} {A} : Union (M A) := union_with (λ x _, Some x).
99
100
101
Instance map_intersection `{Merge M} {A} : Intersection (M A) :=
  intersection_with (λ x _, Some x).

102
103
(** The difference operation removes all values from the first map whose
index contains a value in the second map as well. *)
104
Instance map_difference `{Merge M} {A} : Difference (M A) :=
105
  difference_with (λ _ _, None).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
106

107
108
109
110
111
112
(** A stronger variant of map that allows the mapped function to use the index
of the elements. Implemented by conversion to lists, so not very efficient. *)
Definition map_imap `{ A, Insert K A (M A),  A, Empty (M A),
     A, FinMapToList K A (M A)} {A B} (f : K  A  option B) (m : M A) : M B :=
  map_of_list (omap (λ ix, (fst ix,) <$> curry f ix) (map_to_list m)).

113
114
115
116
(** * Theorems *)
Section theorems.
Context `{FinMap K M}.

117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
Lemma map_eq_iff {A} (m1 m2 : M A) : m1 = m2   i, m1 !! i = m2 !! i.
Proof. split. by intros ->. apply map_eq. Qed.
Lemma map_subseteq_spec {A} (m1 m2 : M A) :
  m1  m2   i x, m1 !! i = Some x  m2 !! i = Some x.
Proof.
  unfold subseteq, map_subseteq, map_Forall2. split; intros Hm i;
    specialize (Hm i); destruct (m1 !! i), (m2 !! i); naive_solver.
Qed.
125
Global Instance: EmptySpec (M A).
126
Proof.
127
128
  intros A m. rewrite !map_subseteq_spec.
  intros i x. by rewrite lookup_empty.
129
Qed.
130
131
132
133
134
135
Global Instance:  {A} (R : relation A), PreOrder R  PreOrder (map_included R).
Proof.
  split; [intros m i; by destruct (m !! i)|].
  intros m1 m2 m3 Hm12 Hm23 i; specialize (Hm12 i); specialize (Hm23 i).
  destruct (m1 !! i), (m2 !! i), (m3 !! i); try done; etransitivity; eauto.
Qed.
136
Global Instance: PartialOrder (() : relation (M A)).
137
Proof.
138
139
140
  split; [apply _|].
  intros m1 m2; rewrite !map_subseteq_spec.
  intros; apply map_eq; intros i; apply option_eq; naive_solver.
141
142
143
Qed.
Lemma lookup_weaken {A} (m1 m2 : M A) i x :
  m1 !! i = Some x  m1  m2  m2 !! i = Some x.
144
Proof. rewrite !map_subseteq_spec. auto. Qed.
145
146
147
148
149
150
Lemma lookup_weaken_is_Some {A} (m1 m2 : M A) i :
  is_Some (m1 !! i)  m1  m2  is_Some (m2 !! i).
Proof. inversion 1. eauto using lookup_weaken. Qed.
Lemma lookup_weaken_None {A} (m1 m2 : M A) i :
  m2 !! i = None  m1  m2  m1 !! i = None.
Proof.
151
152
  rewrite map_subseteq_spec, !eq_None_not_Some.
  intros Hm2 Hm [??]; destruct Hm2; eauto.
153
154
Qed.
Lemma lookup_weaken_inv {A} (m1 m2 : M A) i x y :
155
156
  m1 !! i = Some x  m1  m2  m2 !! i = Some y  x = y.
Proof. intros Hm1 ? Hm2. eapply lookup_weaken in Hm1; eauto. congruence. Qed.
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
Lemma lookup_ne {A} (m : M A) i j : m !! i  m !! j  i  j.
Proof. congruence. Qed.
Lemma map_empty {A} (m : M A) : ( i, m !! i = None)  m = .
Proof. intros Hm. apply map_eq. intros. by rewrite Hm, lookup_empty. Qed.
Lemma lookup_empty_is_Some {A} i : ¬is_Some (( : M A) !! i).
Proof. rewrite lookup_empty. by inversion 1. Qed.
Lemma lookup_empty_Some {A} i (x : A) : ¬ !! i = Some x.
Proof. by rewrite lookup_empty. Qed.
Lemma map_subset_empty {A} (m : M A) : m  .
166
167
168
Proof.
  intros [_ []]. rewrite map_subseteq_spec. intros ??. by rewrite lookup_empty.
Qed.
169
170

(** ** Properties of the [partial_alter] operation *)
171
172
173
Lemma partial_alter_ext {A} (f g : option A  option A) (m : M A) i :
  ( x, m !! i = x  f x = g x)  partial_alter f i m = partial_alter g i m.
Proof.
174
175
  intros. apply map_eq; intros j. by destruct (decide (i = j)) as [->|?];
    rewrite ?lookup_partial_alter, ?lookup_partial_alter_ne; auto.
176
177
Qed.
Lemma partial_alter_compose {A} f g (m : M A) i:
178
179
  partial_alter (f  g) i m = partial_alter f i (partial_alter g i m).
Proof.
180
181
  intros. apply map_eq. intros ii. by destruct (decide (i = ii)) as [->|?];
    rewrite ?lookup_partial_alter, ?lookup_partial_alter_ne.
182
Qed.
183
Lemma partial_alter_commute {A} f g (m : M A) i j :
184
  i  j  partial_alter f i (partial_alter g j m) =
185
186
    partial_alter g j (partial_alter f i m).
Proof.
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
  intros. apply map_eq; intros jj. destruct (decide (jj = j)) as [->|?].
  { by rewrite lookup_partial_alter_ne,
      !lookup_partial_alter, lookup_partial_alter_ne. }
  destruct (decide (jj = i)) as [->|?].
  * by rewrite lookup_partial_alter,
     !lookup_partial_alter_ne, lookup_partial_alter by congruence.
  * by rewrite !lookup_partial_alter_ne by congruence.
194
195
196
197
Qed.
Lemma partial_alter_self_alt {A} (m : M A) i x :
  x = m !! i  partial_alter (λ _, x) i m = m.
Proof.
198
199
  intros. apply map_eq. intros ii. by destruct (decide (i = ii)) as [->|];
    rewrite ?lookup_partial_alter, ?lookup_partial_alter_ne.
200
Qed.
201
Lemma partial_alter_self {A} (m : M A) i : partial_alter (λ _, m !! i) i m = m.
202
Proof. by apply partial_alter_self_alt. Qed.
203
Lemma partial_alter_subseteq {A} f (m : M A) i :
204
  m !! i = None  m  partial_alter f i m.
205
206
207
208
Proof.
  rewrite map_subseteq_spec. intros Hi j x Hj.
  rewrite lookup_partial_alter_ne; congruence.
Qed.
209
Lemma partial_alter_subset {A} f (m : M A) i :
210
  m !! i = None  is_Some (f (m !! i))  m  partial_alter f i m.
211
Proof.
212
213
214
215
  intros Hi Hfi. split; [by apply partial_alter_subseteq|].
  rewrite !map_subseteq_spec. inversion Hfi as [x Hx]. intros Hm.
  apply (Some_ne_None x). rewrite <-(Hm i x); [done|].
  by rewrite lookup_partial_alter.
216
217
218
Qed.

(** ** Properties of the [alter] operation *)
219
220
Lemma alter_ext {A} (f g : A  A) (m : M A) i :
  ( x, m !! i = Some x  f x = g x)  alter f i m = alter g i m.
221
Proof. intro. apply partial_alter_ext. intros [x|] ?; f_equal'; auto. Qed.
222
Lemma lookup_alter {A} (f : A  A) m i : alter f i m !! i = f <$> m !! i.
223
Proof. unfold alter. apply lookup_partial_alter. Qed.
224
Lemma lookup_alter_ne {A} (f : A  A) m i j : i  j  alter f i m !! j = m !! j.
225
Proof. unfold alter. apply lookup_partial_alter_ne. Qed.
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
Lemma alter_compose {A} (f g : A  A) (m : M A) i:
  alter (f  g) i m = alter f i (alter g i m).
Proof.
  unfold alter, map_alter. rewrite <-partial_alter_compose.
  apply partial_alter_ext. by intros [?|].
Qed.
Lemma alter_commute {A} (f g : A  A) (m : M A) i j :
  i  j  alter f i (alter g j m) = alter g j (alter f i m).
Proof. apply partial_alter_commute. Qed.
235
236
237
238
Lemma lookup_alter_Some {A} (f : A  A) m i j y :
  alter f i m !! j = Some y 
    (i = j   x, m !! j = Some x  y = f x)  (i  j  m !! j = Some y).
Proof.
239
  destruct (decide (i = j)) as [->|?].
240
241
242
243
244
245
  * rewrite lookup_alter. naive_solver (simplify_option_equality; eauto).
  * rewrite lookup_alter_ne by done. naive_solver.
Qed.
Lemma lookup_alter_None {A} (f : A  A) m i j :
  alter f i m !! j = None  m !! j = None.
Proof.
246
247
  by destruct (decide (i = j)) as [->|?];
    rewrite ?lookup_alter, ?fmap_None, ?lookup_alter_ne.
248
Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
249
250
Lemma alter_id {A} (f : A  A) m i :
  ( x, m !! i = Some x  f x = x)  alter f i m = m.
251
Proof.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
252
253
254
  intros Hi; apply map_eq; intros j; destruct (decide (i = j)) as [->|?].
  { rewrite lookup_alter; destruct (m !! j); f_equal'; auto. }
  by rewrite lookup_alter_ne by done.
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
Qed.

(** ** Properties of the [delete] operation *)
Lemma lookup_delete {A} (m : M A) i : delete i m !! i = None.
Proof. apply lookup_partial_alter. Qed.
Lemma lookup_delete_ne {A} (m : M A) i j : i  j  delete i m !! j = m !! j.
Proof. apply lookup_partial_alter_ne. Qed.
Lemma lookup_delete_Some {A} (m : M A) i j y :
  delete i m !! j = Some y  i  j  m !! j = Some y.
Proof.
  split.
266
  * destruct (decide (i = j)) as [->|?];
267
268
269
270
271
272
      rewrite ?lookup_delete, ?lookup_delete_ne; intuition congruence.
  * intros [??]. by rewrite lookup_delete_ne.
Qed.
Lemma lookup_delete_None {A} (m : M A) i j :
  delete i m !! j = None  i = j  m !! j = None.
Proof.
273
274
  destruct (decide (i = j)) as [->|?];
    rewrite ?lookup_delete, ?lookup_delete_ne; tauto.
275
276
277
Qed.
Lemma delete_empty {A} i : delete i ( : M A) = .
Proof. rewrite <-(partial_alter_self ) at 2. by rewrite lookup_empty. Qed.
278
Lemma delete_singleton {A} i (x : A) : delete i {[i, x]} = .
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
Proof. setoid_rewrite <-partial_alter_compose. apply delete_empty. Qed.
Lemma delete_commute {A} (m : M A) i j :
  delete i (delete j m) = delete j (delete i m).
Proof. destruct (decide (i = j)). by subst. by apply partial_alter_commute. Qed.
Lemma delete_insert_ne {A} (m : M A) i j x :
  i  j  delete i (<[j:=x]>m) = <[j:=x]>(delete i m).
Proof. intro. by apply partial_alter_commute. Qed.
286
Lemma delete_notin {A} (m : M A) i : m !! i = None  delete i m = m.
287
Proof.
288
289
  intros. apply map_eq. intros j. by destruct (decide (i = j)) as [->|?];
    rewrite ?lookup_delete, ?lookup_delete_ne.
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
Qed.
Lemma delete_partial_alter {A} (m : M A) i f :
  m !! i = None  delete i (partial_alter f i m) = m.
Proof.
  intros. unfold delete, map_delete. rewrite <-partial_alter_compose.
  unfold compose. by apply partial_alter_self_alt.
Qed.
Lemma delete_insert {A} (m : M A) i x :
  m !! i = None  delete i (<[i:=x]>m) = m.
Proof. apply delete_partial_alter. Qed.
Lemma insert_delete {A} (m : M A) i x :
  m !! i = Some x  <[i:=x]>(delete i m) = m.
Proof.
  intros Hmi. unfold delete, map_delete, insert, map_insert.
  rewrite <-partial_alter_compose. unfold compose. rewrite <-Hmi.
  by apply partial_alter_self_alt.
Qed.
307
Lemma delete_subseteq {A} (m : M A) i : delete i m  m.
308
309
310
Proof.
  rewrite !map_subseteq_spec. intros j x. rewrite lookup_delete_Some. tauto.
Qed.
311
Lemma delete_subseteq_compat {A} (m1 m2 : M A) i :
312
  m1  m2  delete i m1  delete i m2.
313
314
315
316
Proof.
  rewrite !map_subseteq_spec. intros ? j x.
  rewrite !lookup_delete_Some. intuition eauto.
Qed.
317
Lemma delete_subset_alt {A} (m : M A) i x : m !! i = Some x  delete i m  m.
318
Proof.
319
320
321
  split; [apply delete_subseteq|].
  rewrite !map_subseteq_spec. intros Hi. apply (None_ne_Some x).
  by rewrite <-(lookup_delete m i), (Hi i x).
322
Qed.
323
Lemma delete_subset {A} (m : M A) i : is_Some (m !! i)  delete i m  m.
324
325
326
327
328
Proof. inversion 1. eauto using delete_subset_alt. Qed.

(** ** Properties of the [insert] operation *)
Lemma lookup_insert {A} (m : M A) i x : <[i:=x]>m !! i = Some x.
Proof. unfold insert. apply lookup_partial_alter. Qed.
329
Lemma lookup_insert_rev {A}  (m : M A) i x y : <[i:=x]>m !! i = Some y  x = y.
330
Proof. rewrite lookup_insert. congruence. Qed.
331
Lemma lookup_insert_ne {A} (m : M A) i j x : i  j  <[i:=x]>m !! j = m !! j.
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
Proof. unfold insert. apply lookup_partial_alter_ne. Qed.
Lemma insert_commute {A} (m : M A) i j x y :
  i  j  <[i:=x]>(<[j:=y]>m) = <[j:=y]>(<[i:=x]>m).
Proof. apply partial_alter_commute. Qed.
Lemma lookup_insert_Some {A} (m : M A) i j x y :
  <[i:=x]>m !! j = Some y  (i = j  x = y)  (i  j  m !! j = Some y).
Proof.
  split.
340
  * destruct (decide (i = j)) as [->|?];
341
      rewrite ?lookup_insert, ?lookup_insert_ne; intuition congruence.
342
  * intros [[-> ->]|[??]]; [apply lookup_insert|]. by rewrite lookup_insert_ne.
343
344
345
346
Qed.
Lemma lookup_insert_None {A} (m : M A) i j x :
  <[i:=x]>m !! j = None  m !! j = None  i  j.
Proof.
347
348
349
  split; [|by intros [??]; rewrite lookup_insert_ne].
  destruct (decide (i = j)) as [->|];
    rewrite ?lookup_insert, ?lookup_insert_ne; intuition congruence.
350
Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
351
Lemma insert_id {A} (m : M A) i x : m !! i = Some x  <[i:=x]>m = m.
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
Proof.
  intros; apply map_eq; intros j; destruct (decide (i = j)) as [->|];
    by rewrite ?lookup_insert, ?lookup_insert_ne by done.
Qed.
Lemma insert_included {A} R `{!Reflexive R} (m : M A) i x :
  ( y, m !! i = Some y  R y x)  map_included R m (<[i:=x]>m).
Proof.
  intros ? j; destruct (decide (i = j)) as [->|].
  * rewrite lookup_insert. destruct (m !! j); eauto.
  * rewrite lookup_insert_ne by done. by destruct (m !! j).
Qed.
363
Lemma insert_subseteq {A} (m : M A) i x : m !! i = None  m  <[i:=x]>m.
364
Proof. apply partial_alter_subseteq. Qed.
365
Lemma insert_subset {A} (m : M A) i x : m !! i = None  m  <[i:=x]>m.
366
367
Proof. intro. apply partial_alter_subset; eauto. Qed.
Lemma insert_subseteq_r {A} (m1 m2 : M A) i x :
368
  m1 !! i = None  m1  m2  m1  <[i:=x]>m2.
369
Proof.
370
371
372
  rewrite !map_subseteq_spec. intros ?? j ?.
  destruct (decide (j = i)) as [->|?]; [congruence|].
  rewrite lookup_insert_ne; auto.
373
374
Qed.
Lemma insert_delete_subseteq {A} (m1 m2 : M A) i x :
375
  m1 !! i = None  <[i:=x]> m1  m2  m1  delete i m2.
376
Proof.
377
378
379
380
  rewrite !map_subseteq_spec. intros Hi Hix j y Hj.
  destruct (decide (i = j)) as [->|]; [congruence|].
  rewrite lookup_delete_ne by done.
  apply Hix; by rewrite lookup_insert_ne by done.
381
382
Qed.
Lemma delete_insert_subseteq {A} (m1 m2 : M A) i x :
383
  m1 !! i = Some x  delete i m1  m2  m1  <[i:=x]> m2.
384
Proof.
385
386
  rewrite !map_subseteq_spec.
  intros Hix Hi j y Hj. destruct (decide (i = j)) as [->|?].
387
  * rewrite lookup_insert. congruence.
388
  * rewrite lookup_insert_ne by done. apply Hi. by rewrite lookup_delete_ne.
389
390
Qed.
Lemma insert_delete_subset {A} (m1 m2 : M A) i x :
391
  m1 !! i = None  <[i:=x]> m1  m2  m1  delete i m2.
392
Proof.
393
394
395
  intros ? [Hm12 Hm21]; split; [eauto using insert_delete_subseteq|].
  contradict Hm21. apply delete_insert_subseteq; auto.
  eapply lookup_weaken, Hm12. by rewrite lookup_insert.
396
397
Qed.
Lemma insert_subset_inv {A} (m1 m2 : M A) i x :
398
  m1 !! i = None  <[i:=x]> m1  m2 
399
400
401
   m2', m2 = <[i:=x]>m2'  m1  m2'  m2' !! i = None.
Proof.
  intros Hi Hm1m2. exists (delete i m2). split_ands.
402
  * rewrite insert_delete. done. eapply lookup_weaken, strict_include; eauto.
403
404
405
406
    by rewrite lookup_insert.
  * eauto using insert_delete_subset.
  * by rewrite lookup_delete.
Qed.
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
Lemma fmap_insert {A B} (f : A  B) (m : M A) i x :
  f <$> <[i:=x]>m = <[i:=f x]>(f <$> m).
Proof.
  apply map_eq; intros i'; destruct (decide (i' = i)) as [->|].
  * by rewrite lookup_fmap, !lookup_insert.
  * by rewrite lookup_fmap, !lookup_insert_ne, lookup_fmap by done.
Qed.
414
415
Lemma insert_empty {A} i (x : A) : <[i:=x]> = {[i,x]}.
Proof. done. Qed.
416
417
418

(** ** Properties of the singleton maps *)
Lemma lookup_singleton_Some {A} i j (x y : A) :
419
  {[i, x]} !! j = Some y  i = j  x = y.
420
421
Proof.
  unfold singleton, map_singleton.
422
  rewrite lookup_insert_Some, lookup_empty. simpl. intuition congruence.
423
Qed.
424
Lemma lookup_singleton_None {A} i j (x : A) : {[i, x]} !! j = None  i  j.
425
426
427
428
Proof.
  unfold singleton, map_singleton.
  rewrite lookup_insert_None, lookup_empty. simpl. tauto.
Qed.
429
Lemma lookup_singleton {A} i (x : A) : {[i, x]} !! i = Some x.
430
Proof. by rewrite lookup_singleton_Some. Qed.
431
Lemma lookup_singleton_ne {A} i j (x : A) : i  j  {[i, x]} !! j = None.
432
Proof. by rewrite lookup_singleton_None. Qed.
433
Lemma map_non_empty_singleton {A} i (x : A) : {[i,x]}  .
434
435
436
437
Proof.
  intros Hix. apply (f_equal (!! i)) in Hix.
  by rewrite lookup_empty, lookup_singleton in Hix.
Qed.
438
Lemma insert_singleton {A} i (x y : A) : <[i:=y]>{[i, x]} = {[i, y]}.
439
440
441
442
Proof.
  unfold singleton, map_singleton, insert, map_insert.
  by rewrite <-partial_alter_compose.
Qed.
443
Lemma alter_singleton {A} (f : A  A) i x : alter f i {[i,x]} = {[i, f x]}.
444
Proof.
445
  intros. apply map_eq. intros i'. destruct (decide (i = i')) as [->|?].
446
447
448
449
  * by rewrite lookup_alter, !lookup_singleton.
  * by rewrite lookup_alter_ne, !lookup_singleton_ne.
Qed.
Lemma alter_singleton_ne {A} (f : A  A) i j x :
450
  i  j  alter f i {[j,x]} = {[j,x]}.
451
Proof.
452
453
  intros. apply map_eq; intros i'. by destruct (decide (i = i')) as [->|?];
    rewrite ?lookup_alter, ?lookup_singleton_ne, ?lookup_alter_ne by done.
454
455
Qed.

456
457
458
459
460
(** ** Properties of the map operations *)
Lemma fmap_empty {A B} (f : A  B) : f <$>  = .
Proof. apply map_empty; intros i. by rewrite lookup_fmap, lookup_empty. Qed.
Lemma omap_empty {A B} (f : A  option B) : omap f  = .
Proof. apply map_empty; intros i. by rewrite lookup_omap, lookup_empty. Qed.
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
Lemma omap_singleton {A B} (f : A  option B) i x y :
  f x = Some y  omap f {[ i,x ]} = {[ i,y ]}.
Proof.
  intros; apply map_eq; intros j; destruct (decide (i = j)) as [->|].
  * by rewrite lookup_omap, !lookup_singleton.
  * by rewrite lookup_omap, !lookup_singleton_ne.
Qed.
468

469
470
(** ** Properties of conversion to lists *)
Lemma map_to_list_unique {A} (m : M A) i x y :
471
  (i,x)  map_to_list m  (i,y)  map_to_list m  x = y.
472
Proof. rewrite !elem_of_map_to_list. congruence. Qed.
473
Lemma NoDup_fst_map_to_list {A} (m : M A) : NoDup ((map_to_list m).*1).
474
Proof. eauto using NoDup_fmap_fst, map_to_list_unique, NoDup_map_to_list. Qed.
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
Lemma elem_of_map_of_list_1_help {A} (l : list (K * A)) i x :
  (i,x)  l  ( y, (i,y)  l  y = x)  map_of_list l !! i = Some x.
Proof.
  induction l as [|[j y] l IH]; csimpl; [by rewrite elem_of_nil|].
  setoid_rewrite elem_of_cons.
  intros [?|?] Hdup; simplify_equality; [by rewrite lookup_insert|].
  destruct (decide (i = j)) as [->|].
  * rewrite lookup_insert; f_equal; eauto.
  * rewrite lookup_insert_ne by done; eauto.
Qed.
485
Lemma elem_of_map_of_list_1 {A} (l : list (K * A)) i x :
486
  NoDup (l.*1)  (i,x)  l  map_of_list l !! i = Some x.
487
Proof.
488
489
  intros ? Hx; apply elem_of_map_of_list_1_help; eauto using NoDup_fmap_fst.
  intros y; revert Hx. rewrite !elem_of_list_lookup; intros [i' Hi'] [j' Hj'].
490
  cut (i' = j'); [naive_solver|]. apply NoDup_lookup with (l.*1) i;
491
    by rewrite ?list_lookup_fmap, ?Hi', ?Hj'.
492
493
Qed.
Lemma elem_of_map_of_list_2 {A} (l : list (K * A)) i x :
494
  map_of_list l !! i = Some x  (i,x)  l.
495
Proof.
496
497
498
  induction l as [|[j y] l IH]; simpl; [by rewrite lookup_empty|].
  rewrite elem_of_cons. destruct (decide (i = j)) as [->|];
    rewrite ?lookup_insert, ?lookup_insert_ne; intuition congruence.
499
500
Qed.
Lemma elem_of_map_of_list {A} (l : list (K * A)) i x :
501
  NoDup (l.*1)  (i,x)  l  map_of_list l !! i = Some x.
502
Proof. split; auto using elem_of_map_of_list_1, elem_of_map_of_list_2. Qed.
503
Lemma not_elem_of_map_of_list_1 {A} (l : list (K * A)) i :
504
  i  l.*1  map_of_list l !! i = None.
505
Proof.
506
507
  rewrite elem_of_list_fmap, eq_None_not_Some. intros Hi [x ?]; destruct Hi.
  exists (i,x); simpl; auto using elem_of_map_of_list_2.
508
509
Qed.
Lemma not_elem_of_map_of_list_2 {A} (l : list (K * A)) i :
510
  map_of_list l !! i = None  i  l.*1.
511
Proof.
512
  induction l as [|[j y] l IH]; csimpl; [rewrite elem_of_nil; tauto|].
513
514
515
516
517
  rewrite elem_of_cons. destruct (decide (i = j)); simplify_equality.
  * by rewrite lookup_insert.
  * by rewrite lookup_insert_ne; intuition.
Qed.
Lemma not_elem_of_map_of_list {A} (l : list (K * A)) i :
518
  i  l.*1  map_of_list l !! i = None.
519
Proof. red; auto using not_elem_of_map_of_list_1,not_elem_of_map_of_list_2. Qed.
520
Lemma map_of_list_proper {A} (l1 l2 : list (K * A)) :
521
  NoDup (l1.*1)  l1  l2  map_of_list l1 = map_of_list l2.
522
523
524
525
526
Proof.
  intros ? Hperm. apply map_eq. intros i. apply option_eq. intros x.
  by rewrite <-!elem_of_map_of_list; rewrite <-?Hperm.
Qed.
Lemma map_of_list_inj {A} (l1 l2 : list (K * A)) :
527
  NoDup (l1.*1)  NoDup (l2.*1)  map_of_list l1 = map_of_list l2  l1  l2.
528
Proof.
529
  intros ?? Hl1l2. apply NoDup_Permutation; auto using (NoDup_fmap_1 fst).
530
531
  intros [i x]. by rewrite !elem_of_map_of_list, Hl1l2.
Qed.
532
Lemma map_of_to_list {A} (m : M A) : map_of_list (map_to_list m) = m.
533
534
535
Proof.
  apply map_eq. intros i. apply option_eq. intros x.
  by rewrite <-elem_of_map_of_list, elem_of_map_to_list
536
    by auto using NoDup_fst_map_to_list.
537
538
Qed.
Lemma map_to_of_list {A} (l : list (K * A)) :
539
  NoDup (l.*1)  map_to_list (map_of_list l)  l.
540
Proof. auto using map_of_list_inj, NoDup_fst_map_to_list, map_of_to_list. Qed.
541
Lemma map_to_list_inj {A} (m1 m2 : M A) :
542
  map_to_list m1  map_to_list m2  m1 = m2.
543
Proof.
544
  intros. rewrite <-(map_of_to_list m1), <-(map_of_to_list m2).
545
  auto using map_of_list_proper, NoDup_fst_map_to_list.
546
Qed.
547
548
549
550
551
552
Lemma map_to_of_list_flip {A} (m1 : M A) l2 :
  map_to_list m1  l2  m1 = map_of_list l2.
Proof.
  intros. rewrite <-(map_of_to_list m1).
  auto using map_of_list_proper, NoDup_fst_map_to_list.
Qed.
553
Lemma map_to_list_empty {A} : map_to_list  = @nil (K * A).
554
555
556
557
558
Proof.
  apply elem_of_nil_inv. intros [i x].
  rewrite elem_of_map_to_list. apply lookup_empty_Some.
Qed.
Lemma map_to_list_insert {A} (m : M A) i x :
559
  m !! i = None  map_to_list (<[i:=x]>m)  (i,x) :: map_to_list m.
560
Proof.
561
  intros. apply map_of_list_inj; csimpl.
562
563
  * apply NoDup_fst_map_to_list.
  * constructor; auto using NoDup_fst_map_to_list.
564
    rewrite elem_of_list_fmap. intros [[??] [? Hlookup]]; subst; simpl in *.
565
566
567
    rewrite elem_of_map_to_list in Hlookup. congruence.
  * by rewrite !map_of_to_list.
Qed.
568
Lemma map_of_list_nil {A} : map_of_list (@nil (K * A)) = .
569
570
571
572
Proof. done. Qed.
Lemma map_of_list_cons {A} (l : list (K * A)) i x :
  map_of_list ((i, x) :: l) = <[i:=x]>(map_of_list l).
Proof. done. Qed.
573
Lemma map_to_list_empty_inv_alt {A}  (m : M A) : map_to_list m  []  m = .
574
Proof. rewrite <-map_to_list_empty. apply map_to_list_inj. Qed.
575
Lemma map_to_list_empty_inv {A} (m : M A) : map_to_list m = []  m = .
576
577
Proof. intros Hm. apply map_to_list_empty_inv_alt. by rewrite Hm. Qed.
Lemma map_to_list_insert_inv {A} (m : M A) l i x :
578
  map_to_list m  (i,x) :: l  m = <[i:=x]>(map_of_list l).
579
580
Proof.
  intros Hperm. apply map_to_list_inj.
581
582
583
  assert (i  l.*1  NoDup (l.*1)) as [].
  { rewrite <-NoDup_cons. change (NoDup (((i,x)::l).*1)). rewrite <-Hperm.
    auto using NoDup_fst_map_to_list. }
584
585
586
  rewrite Hperm, map_to_list_insert, map_to_of_list;
    auto using not_elem_of_map_of_list_1.
Qed.
587
588
589
590
591
592
Lemma map_choose {A} (m : M A) : m     i x, m !! i = Some x.
Proof.
  intros Hemp. destruct (map_to_list m) as [|[i x] l] eqn:Hm.
  { destruct Hemp; eauto using map_to_list_empty_inv. }
  exists i x. rewrite <-elem_of_map_to_list, Hm. by left.
Qed.
593

594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
(** Properties of the imap function *)
Lemma lookup_imap {A B} (f : K  A  option B) m i :
  map_imap f m !! i = m !! i = f i.
Proof.
  unfold map_imap; destruct (m !! i = f i) as [y|] eqn:Hi; simpl.
  * destruct (m !! i) as [x|] eqn:?; simplify_equality'.
    apply elem_of_map_of_list_1_help.
    { apply elem_of_list_omap; exists (i,x); split;
        [by apply elem_of_map_to_list|by simplify_option_equality]. }
    intros y'; rewrite elem_of_list_omap; intros ([i' x']&Hi'&?).
    by rewrite elem_of_map_to_list in Hi'; simplify_option_equality.
  * apply not_elem_of_map_of_list; rewrite elem_of_list_fmap.
    intros ([i' x]&->&Hi'); simplify_equality'.
    rewrite elem_of_list_omap in Hi'; destruct Hi' as ([j y]&Hj&?).
    rewrite elem_of_map_to_list in Hj; simplify_option_equality.
Qed.

611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
(** ** Properties of conversion from collections *)
Lemma lookup_map_of_collection {A} `{FinCollection K C}
    (f : K  option A) X i x :
  map_of_collection f X !! i = Some x  i  X  f i = Some x.
Proof.
  assert (NoDup (fst <$> omap (λ i, (i,) <$> f i) (elements X))).
  { induction (NoDup_elements X) as [|i' l]; csimpl; [constructor|].
    destruct (f i') as [x'|]; csimpl; auto; constructor; auto.
    rewrite elem_of_list_fmap. setoid_rewrite elem_of_list_omap.
    by intros (?&?&?&?&?); simplify_option_equality. }
  unfold map_of_collection; rewrite <-elem_of_map_of_list by done.
  rewrite elem_of_list_omap. setoid_rewrite elem_of_elements; split.
  * intros (?&?&?); simplify_option_equality; eauto.
  * intros [??]; exists i; simplify_option_equality; eauto.
Qed.

(** ** Induction principles *)
628
Lemma map_ind {A} (P : M A  Prop) :
629
  P   ( i x m, m !! i = None  P m  P (<[i:=x]>m))   m, P m.
630
Proof.
631
  intros ? Hins. cut ( l, NoDup (l.*1)   m, map_to_list m  l  P m).
632
  { intros help m.
633
    apply (help (map_to_list m)); auto using NoDup_fst_map_to_list. }
634
635
636
  induction l as [|[i x] l IH]; intros Hnodup m Hml.
  { apply map_to_list_empty_inv_alt in Hml. by subst. }
  inversion_clear Hnodup.
637
  apply map_to_list_insert_inv in Hml; subst m. apply Hins.
638
639
640
641
  * by apply not_elem_of_map_of_list_1.
  * apply IH; auto using map_to_of_list.
Qed.
Lemma map_to_list_length {A} (m1 m2 : M A) :
642
  m1  m2  length (map_to_list m1) < length (map_to_list m2).
643
644
645
646
Proof.
  revert m2. induction m1 as [|i x m ? IH] using map_ind.
  { intros m2 Hm2. rewrite map_to_list_empty. simpl.
    apply neq_0_lt. intros Hlen. symmetry in Hlen.
647
    apply nil_length_inv, map_to_list_empty_inv in Hlen.
648
649
650
651
652
    rewrite Hlen in Hm2. destruct (irreflexivity ()  Hm2). }
  intros m2 Hm2.
  destruct (insert_subset_inv m m2 i x) as (m2'&?&?&?); auto; subst.
  rewrite !map_to_list_insert; simpl; auto with arith.
Qed.
653
Lemma map_wf {A} : wf (strict (@subseteq (M A) _)).
654
655
656
657
658
659
Proof.
  apply (wf_projected (<) (length  map_to_list)).
  * by apply map_to_list_length.
  * by apply lt_wf.
Qed.

660
(** ** Properties of the [map_Forall] predicate *)
661
Section map_Forall.
662
663
Context {A} (P : K  A  Prop).

664
Lemma map_Forall_to_list m : map_Forall P m  Forall (curry P) (map_to_list m).
665
666
Proof.
  rewrite Forall_forall. split.
667
668
  * intros Hforall [i x]. rewrite elem_of_map_to_list. by apply (Hforall i x).
  * intros Hforall i x. rewrite <-elem_of_map_to_list. by apply (Hforall (i,x)).
669
Qed.
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
Lemma map_Forall_empty : map_Forall P .
Proof. intros i x. by rewrite lookup_empty. Qed.
Lemma map_Forall_impl (Q : K  A  Prop) m :
  map_Forall P m  ( i x, P i x  Q i x)  map_Forall Q m.
Proof. unfold map_Forall; naive_solver. Qed.
Lemma map_Forall_insert_11 m i x : map_Forall P (<[i:=x]>m)  P i x.
Proof. intros Hm. by apply Hm; rewrite lookup_insert. Qed.
Lemma map_Forall_insert_12 m i x :
  m !! i = None  map_Forall P (<[i:=x]>m)  map_Forall P m.
Proof.
  intros ? Hm j y ?; apply Hm. by rewrite lookup_insert_ne by congruence.
Qed.
Lemma map_Forall_insert_2 m i x :
  P i x  map_Forall P m  map_Forall P (<[i:=x]>m).
Proof. intros ?? j y; rewrite lookup_insert_Some; naive_solver. Qed.
Lemma map_Forall_insert m i x :
  m !! i = None  map_Forall P (<[i:=x]>m)  P i x  map_Forall P m.
Proof.
  naive_solver eauto using map_Forall_insert_11,
    map_Forall_insert_12, map_Forall_insert_2.
Qed.
Lemma map_Forall_ind (Q : M A  Prop) :
  Q  
  ( m i x, m !! i = None  P i x  map_Forall P m  Q m  Q (<[i:=x]>m)) 
   m, map_Forall P m  Q m.
Proof.
  intros Hnil Hinsert m. induction m using map_ind; auto.
  rewrite map_Forall_insert by done; intros [??]; eauto.
Qed.
699
700

Context `{ i x, Decision (P i x)}.
701
Global Instance map_Forall_dec m : Decision (map_Forall P m).
702
703
Proof.
  refine (cast_if (decide (Forall (curry P) (map_to_list m))));
704
    by rewrite map_Forall_to_list.
705
Defined.
706
707
Lemma map_not_Forall (m : M A) :
  ¬map_Forall P m   i x, m !! i = Some x  ¬P i x.
708
Proof.
709
710
711
712
  split; [|intros (i&x&?&?) Hm; specialize (Hm i x); tauto].
  rewrite map_Forall_to_list. intros Hm.
  apply (not_Forall_Exists _), Exists_exists in Hm.
  destruct Hm as ([i x]&?&?). exists i x. by rewrite <-elem_of_map_to_list.
713
Qed.
714
End map_Forall.
715
716
717
718

(** ** Properties of the [merge] operation *)
Section merge.
Context {A} (f : option A  option A  option A).
719
Context `{!PropHolds (f None None = None)}.
720
721
722
Global Instance: LeftId (=) None f  LeftId (=)  (merge f).
Proof.
  intros ??. apply map_eq. intros.
723
  by rewrite !(lookup_merge f), lookup_empty, (left_id_L None f).
724
725
726
727
Qed.
Global Instance: RightId (=) None f  RightId (=)  (merge f).
Proof.
  intros ??. apply map_eq. intros.
728
  by rewrite !(lookup_merge f), lookup_empty, (right_id_L None f).
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
Qed.
Lemma merge_commutative m1 m2 :
  ( i, f (m1 !! i) (m2 !! i) = f (m2 !! i) (m1 !! i)) 
  merge f m1 m2 = merge f m2 m1.
Proof. intros. apply map_eq. intros. by rewrite !(lookup_merge f). Qed.
Global Instance: Commutative (=) f  Commutative (=) (merge f).
Proof.
  intros ???. apply merge_commutative. intros. by apply (commutative f).
Qed.
Lemma merge_associative m1 m2 m3 :
  ( i, f (m1 !! i) (f (m2 !! i) (m3 !! i)) =
        f (f (m1 !! i) (m2 !! i)) (m3 !! i)) 
  merge f m1 (merge f m2 m3) = merge f (merge f m1 m2) m3.
Proof. intros. apply map_eq. intros. by rewrite !(lookup_merge f). Qed.
Global Instance: Associative (=) f  Associative (=) (merge f).
Proof.
745
  intros ????. apply merge_associative. intros. by apply (associative_L f).
746
747
Qed.
Lemma merge_idempotent m1 :
748
  ( i, f (m1 !! i) (m1 !! i) = m1 !! i)  merge f m1 m1 = m1.
749
750
Proof. intros. apply map_eq. intros. by rewrite !(lookup_merge f). Qed.
Global Instance: Idempotent (=) f  Idempotent (=) (merge f).
751
Proof. intros ??. apply merge_idempotent. intros. by apply (idempotent f). Qed.
752
End merge.
753

754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
Section more_merge.
Context {A B C} (f : option A  option B  option C).
Context `{!PropHolds (f None None = None)}.
Lemma merge_Some m1 m2 m :
  ( i, m !! i = f (m1 !! i) (m2 !! i))  merge f m1 m2 = m.
Proof.
  split; [|intros <-; apply (lookup_merge _) ].
  intros Hlookup. apply map_eq; intros. rewrite Hlookup. apply (lookup_merge _).
Qed.
Lemma merge_empty : merge f   = .
Proof. apply map_eq. intros. by rewrite !(lookup_merge f), !lookup_empty. Qed.
Lemma partial_alter_merge g g1 g2 m1 m2 i :
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
  g (f (m1 !! i) (m2 !! i)) = f (g1 (m1 !! i)) (g2 (m2 !! i)) 
  partial_alter g i (merge f m1 m2) =
    merge f (partial_alter g1 i m1) (partial_alter g2 i m2).
Proof.
  intro. apply map_eq. intros j. destruct (decide (i = j)); subst.
  * by rewrite (lookup_merge _), !lookup_partial_alter, !(lookup_merge _).
  * by rewrite (lookup_merge _), !lookup_partial_alter_ne, (lookup_merge _).
Qed.
774
Lemma partial_alter_merge_l g g1 m1 m2 i :
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
  g (f (m1 !! i) (m2 !! i)) = f (g1 (m1 !! i)) (m2 !! i) 
  partial_alter g i (merge f m1 m2) = merge f (partial_alter g1 i m1) m2.
Proof.
  intro. apply map_eq. intros j. destruct (decide (i = j)); subst.
  * by rewrite (lookup_merge _), !lookup_partial_alter, !(lookup_merge _).
  * by rewrite (lookup_merge _), !lookup_partial_alter_ne, (lookup_merge _).
Qed.
782
Lemma partial_alter_merge_r g g2 m1 m2