1. 22 Feb, 2017 1 commit
  2. 21 Feb, 2017 1 commit
  3. 15 Feb, 2017 2 commits
  4. 13 Feb, 2017 1 commit
  5. 12 Feb, 2017 1 commit
    • Robbert Krebbers's avatar
      Make iSpecialize work with coercions. · f1b30a2e
      Robbert Krebbers authored
      For example, when having `"H" : ∀ x : Z, P x`, using
      `iSpecialize ("H" $! (0:nat))` now works. We do this by first
      resolving the `IntoForall` type class, and then instantiating
      the quantifier.
      f1b30a2e
  6. 11 Feb, 2017 3 commits
  7. 09 Feb, 2017 2 commits
  8. 06 Feb, 2017 1 commit
  9. 30 Jan, 2017 3 commits
    • Robbert Krebbers's avatar
      Support introduction patterns /=, {H}, {$H} in iDestruct. · 686f5740
      Robbert Krebbers authored
      This fixes issue #57.
      
      I considered supporting these introduction patterns also in a nested fashion --
      for example allowing `iDestruct foo as [H1 [{H1} H1 /= H2|H2]` -- but that
      turned out to be quite difficult.
      
      Where should we allow `/=`, `{H}` and `{$H}` exactly. Clearly something like
      `>/=` makes no sense, unless we adopt to some kind of 'stack like' semantics
      for introduction patterns as in ssreflect. Alternatively, we could only allow
      these patterns in the branches of the destructing introduction pattern
      `[... | ... | ...]` but that brings other complications, e.g.:
      
      - What to do with `(H1 & /= & H3)`?
      - How to distinguish the introduction patterns `[H _]` and `[_ H]` for
        destructing a spatial conjunction? We cannot simply match on the shape of the
        introduction pattern anymore, because one could also write `[_ H /=]`.
      686f5740
    • Robbert Krebbers's avatar
      6fc0ecff
    • Robbert Krebbers's avatar
      1805a435
  10. 29 Jan, 2017 1 commit
  11. 24 Jan, 2017 4 commits
  12. 23 Jan, 2017 2 commits
  13. 22 Jan, 2017 2 commits
  14. 20 Jan, 2017 2 commits
  15. 12 Jan, 2017 1 commit
  16. 11 Jan, 2017 1 commit
  17. 05 Jan, 2017 2 commits
  18. 04 Jan, 2017 1 commit
  19. 03 Jan, 2017 1 commit
  20. 01 Jan, 2017 1 commit
  21. 28 Dec, 2016 1 commit
  22. 27 Dec, 2016 1 commit
  23. 20 Dec, 2016 2 commits
  24. 12 Dec, 2016 1 commit
  25. 09 Dec, 2016 1 commit
  26. 29 Nov, 2016 1 commit