### docs: rename some section labels

parent d4316b8a
 ... @@ -253,7 +253,8 @@ We obtain the following frame-preserving update: ... @@ -253,7 +253,8 @@ We obtain the following frame-preserving update: % \end{proof} % \end{proof} \subsection{Authoritative}\label{sec:auth} \subsection{Authoritative} \label{sec:auth-cmra} Given a CMRA $M$, we construct a monoid $\authm(M)$ modeling someone owning an \emph{authoritative} element $x$ of $M$, and others potentially owning fragments $\melt \le_M x$ of $x$. Given a CMRA $M$, we construct a monoid $\authm(M)$ modeling someone owning an \emph{authoritative} element $x$ of $M$, and others potentially owning fragments $\melt \le_M x$ of $x$. We assume that $M$ has a unit $\munit$, and hence its core is total. We assume that $M$ has a unit $\munit$, and hence its core is total. ... @@ -286,7 +287,7 @@ We then obtain ... @@ -286,7 +287,7 @@ We then obtain \end{mathpar} \end{mathpar} \subsection{STS with tokens} \subsection{STS with tokens} \label{sec:stsmon} \label{sec:sts-cmra} Given a state-transition system~(STS, \ie a directed graph) $(\STSS, {\stsstep} \subseteq \STSS \times \STSS)$, a set of tokens $\STST$, and a labeling $\STSL: \STSS \ra \wp(\STST)$ of \emph{protocol-owned} tokens for each state, we construct an RA modeling an authoritative current state and permitting transitions given a \emph{bound} on the current state and a set of \emph{locally-owned} tokens. Given a state-transition system~(STS, \ie a directed graph) $(\STSS, {\stsstep} \subseteq \STSS \times \STSS)$, a set of tokens $\STST$, and a labeling $\STSL: \STSS \ra \wp(\STST)$ of \emph{protocol-owned} tokens for each state, we construct an RA modeling an authoritative current state and permitting transitions given a \emph{bound} on the current state and a set of \emph{locally-owned} tokens. ... ...
Markdown is supported
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!