Make trivial instances explicit

This is in preparation for coq/coq#9274.

theories/algebra/agree.v

@@ -249,7 +249,7 @@ Lemma to_agree_uninjI {M} x : ✓ x ⊢@{uPredI M} ∃ a, to_agree a ≡ x.
 Proof. uPred.unseal. split=> n y _. exact: to_agree_uninjN. Qed.
 End agree.
 
-Instance: Params (@to_agree) 1.
+Instance: Params (@to_agree) 1 := {}.
 Arguments agreeC : clear implicits.
 Arguments agreeR : clear implicits.
 

theories/algebra/auth.v

@@ -8,9 +8,9 @@ Add Printing Constructor auth.
 Arguments Auth {_} _ _.
 Arguments authoritative {_} _.
 Arguments auth_own {_} _.
-Instance: Params (@Auth) 1.
-Instance: Params (@authoritative) 1.
-Instance: Params (@auth_own) 1.
+Instance: Params (@Auth) 1 := {}.
+Instance: Params (@authoritative) 1 := {}.
+Instance: Params (@auth_own) 1 := {}.
 Notation "◯ a" := (Auth None a) (at level 20).
 Notation "● a" := (Auth (Excl' a) ε) (at level 20).
 

theories/algebra/big_op.v

@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ Fixpoint big_opL `{Monoid M o} {A} (f : nat → A → M) (xs : list A) : M :=
   | [] => monoid_unit
   | x :: xs => o (f 0 x) (big_opL (λ n, f (S n)) xs)
   end.
-Instance: Params (@big_opL) 4.
+Instance: Params (@big_opL) 4 := {}.
 Arguments big_opL {M} o {_ A} _ !_ /.
 Typeclasses Opaque big_opL.
 Notation "'[^' o 'list]' k ↦ x ∈ l , P" := (big_opL o (λ k x, P) l)
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ Notation "'[^' o 'list]' x ∈ l , P" := (big_opL o (λ _ x, P) l)
 
 Definition big_opM `{Monoid M o} `{Countable K} {A} (f : K → A → M)
     (m : gmap K A) : M := big_opL o (λ _, curry f) (map_to_list m).
-Instance: Params (@big_opM) 7.
+Instance: Params (@big_opM) 7 := {}.
 Arguments big_opM {M} o {_ K _ _ A} _ _ : simpl never.
 Typeclasses Opaque big_opM.
 Notation "'[^' o 'map]' k ↦ x ∈ m , P" := (big_opM o (λ k x, P) m)
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ Notation "'[^' o 'map]' x ∈ m , P" := (big_opM o (λ _ x, P) m)
 
 Definition big_opS `{Monoid M o} `{Countable A} (f : A → M)
   (X : gset A) : M := big_opL o (λ _, f) (elements X).
-Instance: Params (@big_opS) 6.
+Instance: Params (@big_opS) 6 := {}.
 Arguments big_opS {M} o {_ A _ _} _ _ : simpl never.
 Typeclasses Opaque big_opS.
 Notation "'[^' o 'set]' x ∈ X , P" := (big_opS o (λ x, P) X)
@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ Notation "'[^' o 'set]' x ∈ X , P" := (big_opS o (λ x, P) X)
 
 Definition big_opMS `{Monoid M o} `{Countable A} (f : A → M)
   (X : gmultiset A) : M := big_opL o (λ _, f) (elements X).
-Instance: Params (@big_opMS) 7.
+Instance: Params (@big_opMS) 7 := {}.
 Arguments big_opMS {M} o {_ A _ _} _ _ : simpl never.
 Typeclasses Opaque big_opMS.
 Notation "'[^' o 'mset]' x ∈ X , P" := (big_opMS o (λ x, P) X)
@@ -417,7 +417,7 @@ Section homomorphisms.
   [RewriteRelation] instance. For the purpose of this section, we want to
   rewrite with arbitrary relations, so we declare any relation to be a
   [RewriteRelation]. *)
-  Local Instance: ∀ {A} (R : relation A), RewriteRelation R.
+  Local Instance: ∀ {A} (R : relation A), RewriteRelation R := {}.
 
   Lemma big_opL_commute {A} (h : M1 → M2) `{!MonoidHomomorphism o1 o2 R h}
       (f : nat → A → M1) l :

theories/algebra/cmra.v

@@ -4,11 +4,11 @@ Set Default Proof Using "Type".
 
 Class PCore (A : Type) := pcore : A → option A.
 Hint Mode PCore ! : typeclass_instances.
-Instance: Params (@pcore) 2.
+Instance: Params (@pcore) 2 := {}.
 
 Class Op (A : Type) := op : A → A → A.
 Hint Mode Op ! : typeclass_instances.
-Instance: Params (@op) 2.
+Instance: Params (@op) 2 := {}.
 Infix "⋅" := op (at level 50, left associativity) : stdpp_scope.
 Notation "(⋅)" := op (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
 
@@ -21,23 +21,23 @@ Definition included `{Equiv A, Op A} (x y : A) := ∃ z, y ≡ x ⋅ z.
 Infix "≼" := included (at level 70) : stdpp_scope.
 Notation "(≼)" := included (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
 Hint Extern 0 (_ ≼ _) => reflexivity : core.
-Instance: Params (@included) 3.
+Instance: Params (@included) 3 := {}.
 
 Class ValidN (A : Type) := validN : nat → A → Prop.
 Hint Mode ValidN ! : typeclass_instances.
-Instance: Params (@validN) 3.
+Instance: Params (@validN) 3 := {}.
 Notation "✓{ n } x" := (validN n x)
   (at level 20, n at next level, format "✓{ n }  x").
 
 Class Valid (A : Type) := valid : A → Prop.
 Hint Mode Valid ! : typeclass_instances.
-Instance: Params (@valid) 2.
+Instance: Params (@valid) 2 := {}.
 Notation "✓ x" := (valid x) (at level 20) : stdpp_scope.
 
 Definition includedN `{Dist A, Op A} (n : nat) (x y : A) := ∃ z, y ≡{n}≡ x ⋅ z.
 Notation "x ≼{ n } y" := (includedN n x y)
   (at level 70, n at next level, format "x  ≼{ n }  y") : stdpp_scope.
-Instance: Params (@includedN) 4.
+Instance: Params (@includedN) 4 := {}.
 Hint Extern 0 (_ ≼{_} _) => reflexivity : core.
 
 Section mixin.
@@ -147,27 +147,27 @@ Infix "⋅?" := opM (at level 50, left associativity) : stdpp_scope.
 Class CoreId {A : cmraT} (x : A) := core_id : pcore x ≡ Some x.
 Arguments core_id {_} _ {_}.
 Hint Mode CoreId + ! : typeclass_instances.
-Instance: Params (@CoreId) 1.
+Instance: Params (@CoreId) 1 := {}.
 
 (** * Exclusive elements (i.e., elements that cannot have a frame). *)
 Class Exclusive {A : cmraT} (x : A) := exclusive0_l y : ✓{0} (x ⋅ y) → False.
 Arguments exclusive0_l {_} _ {_} _ _.
 Hint Mode Exclusive + ! : typeclass_instances.
-Instance: Params (@Exclusive) 1.
+Instance: Params (@Exclusive) 1 := {}.
 
 (** * Cancelable elements. *)
 Class Cancelable {A : cmraT} (x : A) :=
   cancelableN n y z : ✓{n}(x ⋅ y) → x ⋅ y ≡{n}≡ x ⋅ z → y ≡{n}≡ z.
 Arguments cancelableN {_} _ {_} _ _ _ _.
 Hint Mode Cancelable + ! : typeclass_instances.
-Instance: Params (@Cancelable) 1.
+Instance: Params (@Cancelable) 1 := {}.
 
 (** * Identity-free elements. *)
 Class IdFree {A : cmraT} (x : A) :=
   id_free0_r y : ✓{0}x → x ⋅ y ≡{0}≡ x → False.
 Arguments id_free0_r {_} _ {_} _ _.
 Hint Mode IdFree + ! : typeclass_instances.
-Instance: Params (@IdFree) 1.
+Instance: Params (@IdFree) 1 := {}.
 
 (** * CMRAs whose core is total *)
 Class CmraTotal (A : cmraT) := cmra_total (x : A) : is_Some (pcore x).
@@ -177,7 +177,7 @@ Hint Mode CmraTotal ! : typeclass_instances.
 core. *)
 Class Core (A : Type) := core : A → A.
 Hint Mode Core ! : typeclass_instances.
-Instance: Params (@core) 2.
+Instance: Params (@core) 2 := {}.
 
 Instance core' `{PCore A} : Core A := λ x, default x (pcore x).
 Arguments core' _ _ _ /.
@@ -779,7 +779,7 @@ Structure rFunctor := RFunctor {
     CmraMorphism (rFunctor_map fg)
 }.
 Existing Instances rFunctor_ne rFunctor_mor.
-Instance: Params (@rFunctor_map) 5.
+Instance: Params (@rFunctor_map) 5 := {}.
 
 Delimit Scope rFunctor_scope with RF.
 Bind Scope rFunctor_scope with rFunctor.
@@ -812,7 +812,7 @@ Structure urFunctor := URFunctor {
     CmraMorphism (urFunctor_map fg)
 }.
 Existing Instances urFunctor_ne urFunctor_mor.
-Instance: Params (@urFunctor_map) 5.
+Instance: Params (@urFunctor_map) 5 := {}.
 
 Delimit Scope urFunctor_scope with URF.
 Bind Scope urFunctor_scope with urFunctor.

theories/algebra/cofe_solver.v

@@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ Qed.
 Program Definition embed (k : nat) (x : A k) : T :=
   {| tower_car n := embed_coerce n x |}.
 Next Obligation. intros k x i. apply g_embed_coerce. Qed.
-Instance: Params (@embed) 1.
+Instance: Params (@embed) 1 := {}.
 Instance embed_ne k : NonExpansive (embed k).
 Proof. by intros n x y Hxy i; rewrite /= Hxy. Qed.
 Definition embed' (k : nat) : A k -n> T := CofeMor (embed k).

theories/algebra/csum.v

@@ -17,9 +17,9 @@ Arguments Cinl {_ _} _.
 Arguments Cinr {_ _} _.
 Arguments CsumBot {_ _}.
 
-Instance: Params (@Cinl) 2.
-Instance: Params (@Cinr) 2.
-Instance: Params (@CsumBot) 2.
+Instance: Params (@Cinl) 2 := {}.
+Instance: Params (@Cinr) 2 := {}.
+Instance: Params (@CsumBot) 2 := {}.
 
 Instance maybe_Cinl {A B} : Maybe (@Cinl A B) := λ x,
   match x with Cinl a => Some a | _ => None end.
@@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ Definition csum_map {A A' B B'} (fA : A → A') (fB : B → B')
   | Cinr b => Cinr (fB b)
   | CsumBot => CsumBot
   end.
-Instance: Params (@csum_map) 4.
+Instance: Params (@csum_map) 4 := {}.
 
 Lemma csum_map_id {A B} (x : csum A B) : csum_map id id x = x.
 Proof. by destruct x. Qed.

theories/algebra/excl.v

@@ -10,8 +10,8 @@ Inductive excl (A : Type) :=
 Arguments Excl {_} _.
 Arguments ExclBot {_}.
 
-Instance: Params (@Excl) 1.
-Instance: Params (@ExclBot) 1.
+Instance: Params (@Excl) 1 := {}.
+Instance: Params (@ExclBot) 1 := {}.
 
 Notation excl' A := (option (excl A)).
 Notation Excl' x := (Some (Excl x)).

theories/algebra/frac_auth.v

@@ -14,8 +14,8 @@ Definition frac_auth_frag {A : cmraT} (q : frac) (x : A) : frac_authR A :=
 
 Typeclasses Opaque frac_auth_auth frac_auth_frag.
 
-Instance: Params (@frac_auth_auth) 1.
-Instance: Params (@frac_auth_frag) 2.
+Instance: Params (@frac_auth_auth) 1 := {}.
+Instance: Params (@frac_auth_frag) 2 := {}.
 
 Notation "●! a" := (frac_auth_auth a) (at level 10).
 Notation "◯!{ q } a" := (frac_auth_frag q a) (at level 10, format "◯!{ q }  a").

theories/algebra/functions.v

@@ -6,11 +6,11 @@ Set Default Proof Using "Type".
 Definition ofe_fun_insert `{EqDecision A} {B : A → ofeT}
     (x : A) (y : B x) (f : ofe_fun B) : ofe_fun B := λ x',
   match decide (x = x') with left H => eq_rect _ B y _ H | right _ => f x' end.
-Instance: Params (@ofe_fun_insert) 5.
+Instance: Params (@ofe_fun_insert) 5 := {}.
 
 Definition ofe_fun_singleton `{EqDecision A} {B : A → ucmraT}
   (x : A) (y : B x) : ofe_fun B := ofe_fun_insert x y ε.
-Instance: Params (@ofe_fun_singleton) 5.
+Instance: Params (@ofe_fun_singleton) 5 := {}.
 
 Section ofe.
   Context `{Heqdec : EqDecision A} {B : A → ofeT}.

theories/algebra/local_updates.v

@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ Set Default Proof Using "Type".
 (** * Local updates *)
 Definition local_update {A : cmraT} (x y : A * A) := ∀ n mz,
   ✓{n} x.1 → x.1 ≡{n}≡ x.2 ⋅? mz → ✓{n} y.1 ∧ y.1 ≡{n}≡ y.2 ⋅? mz.
-Instance: Params (@local_update) 1.
+Instance: Params (@local_update) 1 := {}.
 Infix "~l~>" := local_update (at level 70).
 
 Section updates.

theories/algebra/ofe.v

@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ Set Primitive Projections.
 
 (** Unbundeled version *)
 Class Dist A := dist : nat → relation A.
-Instance: Params (@dist) 3.
+Instance: Params (@dist) 3 := {}.
 Notation "x ≡{ n }≡ y" := (dist n x y)
   (at level 70, n at next level, format "x  ≡{ n }≡  y").
 Notation "x ≡{ n }@{ A }≡ y" := (dist (A:=A) n x y)
@@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ Hint Extern 1 (_ ≡{_}≡ _) => apply equiv_dist; assumption : core.
 Class Discrete {A : ofeT} (x : A) := discrete y : x ≡{0}≡ y → x ≡ y.
 Arguments discrete {_} _ {_} _ _.
 Hint Mode Discrete + ! : typeclass_instances.
-Instance: Params (@Discrete) 1.
+Instance: Params (@Discrete) 1 := {}.
 
 Class OfeDiscrete (A : ofeT) := ofe_discrete_discrete (x : A) :> Discrete x.
 
@@ -573,13 +573,13 @@ Instance ofe_mor_inhabited {A B : ofeT} `{Inhabited B} :
 
 (** Identity and composition and constant function *)
 Definition cid {A} : A -n> A := CofeMor id.
-Instance: Params (@cid) 1.
+Instance: Params (@cid) 1 := {}.
 Definition cconst {A B : ofeT} (x : B) : A -n> B := CofeMor (const x).
-Instance: Params (@cconst) 2.
+Instance: Params (@cconst) 2 := {}.
 
 Definition ccompose {A B C}
   (f : B -n> C) (g : A -n> B) : A -n> C := CofeMor (f ∘ g).
-Instance: Params (@ccompose) 3.
+Instance: Params (@ccompose) 3 := {}.
 Infix "◎" := ccompose (at level 40, left associativity).
 Global Instance ccompose_ne {A B C} :
   NonExpansive2 (@ccompose A B C).
@@ -676,7 +676,7 @@ Structure cFunctor := CFunctor {
     cFunctor_map (f◎g, g'◎f') x ≡ cFunctor_map (g,g') (cFunctor_map (f,f') x)
 }.
 Existing Instance cFunctor_ne.
-Instance: Params (@cFunctor_map) 5.
+Instance: Params (@cFunctor_map) 5 := {}.
 
 Delimit Scope cFunctor_scope with CF.
 Bind Scope cFunctor_scope with cFunctor.
@@ -995,7 +995,7 @@ Record later (A : Type) : Type := Next { later_car : A }.
 Add Printing Constructor later.
 Arguments Next {_} _.
 Arguments later_car {_} _.
-Instance: Params (@Next) 1.
+Instance: Params (@Next) 1 := {}.
 
 Section later.
   Context {A : ofeT}.

theories/algebra/sts.v

@@ -284,9 +284,9 @@ Section sts_definitions.
   Definition sts_frag_up (s : sts.state sts) (T : sts.tokens sts) : stsR sts :=
     sts_frag (sts.up s T) T.
 End sts_definitions.
-Instance: Params (@sts_auth) 2.
-Instance: Params (@sts_frag) 1.
-Instance: Params (@sts_frag_up) 2.
+Instance: Params (@sts_auth) 2 := {}.
+Instance: Params (@sts_frag) 1 := {}.
+Instance: Params (@sts_frag_up) 2 := {}.
 
 Section stsRA.
 Import sts.

theories/algebra/updates.v

@@ -8,13 +8,13 @@ Set Default Proof Using "Type".
 *)
 Definition cmra_updateP {A : cmraT} (x : A) (P : A → Prop) := ∀ n mz,
   ✓{n} (x ⋅? mz) → ∃ y, P y ∧ ✓{n} (y ⋅? mz).
-Instance: Params (@cmra_updateP) 1.
+Instance: Params (@cmra_updateP) 1 := {}.
 Infix "~~>:" := cmra_updateP (at level 70).
 
 Definition cmra_update {A : cmraT} (x y : A) := ∀ n mz,
   ✓{n} (x ⋅? mz) → ✓{n} (y ⋅? mz).
 Infix "~~>" := cmra_update (at level 70).
-Instance: Params (@cmra_update) 1.
+Instance: Params (@cmra_update) 1 := {}.
 
 Section updates.
 Context {A : cmraT}.

theories/base_logic/lib/auth.v

@@ -55,9 +55,9 @@ Section definitions.
 End definitions.
 
 Typeclasses Opaque auth_own auth_inv auth_ctx.
-Instance: Params (@auth_own) 4.
-Instance: Params (@auth_inv) 5.
-Instance: Params (@auth_ctx) 7.
+Instance: Params (@auth_own) 4 := {}.
+Instance: Params (@auth_inv) 5 := {}.
+Instance: Params (@auth_ctx) 7 := {}.
 
 Section auth.
   Context `{invG Σ, authG Σ A}.

theories/base_logic/lib/boxes.v

@@ -40,10 +40,10 @@ Section box_defs.
                          inv N (slice_inv γ (Φ γ)))%I.
 End box_defs.
 
-Instance: Params (@box_own_prop) 3.
-Instance: Params (@slice_inv) 3.
-Instance: Params (@slice) 5.
-Instance: Params (@box) 5.
+Instance: Params (@box_own_prop) 3 := {}.
+Instance: Params (@slice_inv) 3 := {}.
+Instance: Params (@slice) 5 := {}.
+Instance: Params (@box) 5 := {}.
 
 Section box.
 Context `{invG Σ, boxG Σ} (N : namespace).

theories/base_logic/lib/cancelable_invariants.v

@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ Section defs.
     (∃ P', □ ▷ (P ↔ P') ∗ inv N (P' ∨ cinv_own γ 1%Qp))%I.
 End defs.
 
-Instance: Params (@cinv) 5.
+Instance: Params (@cinv) 5 := {}.
 
 Section proofs.
   Context `{invG Σ, cinvG Σ}.
@@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ Section proofs.
     iIntros "!> HP". iApply "H"; auto.
   Qed.
 
-  Global Instance into_inv_cinv N γ P : IntoInv (cinv N γ P) N.
+  Global Instance into_inv_cinv N γ P : IntoInv (cinv N γ P) N := {}.
 
   Global Instance into_acc_cinv E N γ P p :
     IntoAcc (X:=unit) (cinv N γ P)

theories/base_logic/lib/invariants.v

@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ Definition inv_def `{invG Σ} (N : namespace) (P : iProp Σ) : iProp Σ :=
 Definition inv_aux : seal (@inv_def). by eexists. Qed.
 Definition inv {Σ i} := inv_aux.(unseal) Σ i.
 Definition inv_eq : @inv = @inv_def := inv_aux.(seal_eq).
-Instance: Params (@inv) 3.
+Instance: Params (@inv) 3 := {}.
 Typeclasses Opaque inv.
 
 Section inv.
@@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ Proof.
   by rewrite left_id_L.
 Qed.
 
-Global Instance into_inv_inv N P : IntoInv (inv N P) N.
+Global Instance into_inv_inv N P : IntoInv (inv N P) N := {}.
 
 Global Instance into_acc_inv E N P :
   IntoAcc (X:=unit) (inv N P) 

theories/base_logic/lib/na_invariants.v

@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ Section defs.
           inv N (P ∗ own p (CoPset ∅, GSet {[i]}) ∨ na_own p {[i]}))%I.
 End defs.
 
-Instance: Params (@na_inv) 3.
+Instance: Params (@na_inv) 3 := {}.
 Typeclasses Opaque na_own na_inv.
 
 Section proofs.
@@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ Section proofs.
     - iDestruct (na_own_disjoint with "Htoki Htoki2") as %?. set_solver.
   Qed.
 
-  Global Instance into_inv_na p N P : IntoInv (na_inv p N P) N.
+  Global Instance into_inv_na p N P : IntoInv (na_inv p N P) N := {}.
 
   Global Instance into_acc_na p F E N P :
     IntoAcc (X:=unit) (na_inv p N P)

theories/base_logic/lib/own.v

@@ -49,14 +49,14 @@ Ltac solve_inG :=
 (** * Definition of the connective [own] *)
 Definition iRes_singleton `{i : inG Σ A} (γ : gname) (a : A) : iResUR Σ :=
   ofe_fun_singleton (inG_id i) {[ γ := cmra_transport inG_prf a ]}.
-Instance: Params (@iRes_singleton) 4.
+Instance: Params (@iRes_singleton) 4 := {}.
 
 Definition own_def `{inG Σ A} (γ : gname) (a : A) : iProp Σ :=
   uPred_ownM (iRes_singleton γ a).
 Definition own_aux : seal (@own_def). by eexists. Qed.
 Definition own {Σ A i} := own_aux.(unseal) Σ A i.
 Definition own_eq : @own = @own_def := own_aux.(seal_eq).
-Instance: Params (@own) 4.
+Instance: Params (@own) 4 := {}.
 Typeclasses Opaque own.
 
 (** * Properties about ghost ownership *)

theories/base_logic/lib/saved_prop.v

@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ Definition saved_anything_own `{savedAnythingG Σ F}
     (γ : gname) (x : F (iProp Σ)) : iProp Σ :=
   own γ (to_agree $ (cFunctor_map F (iProp_fold, iProp_unfold) x)).
 Typeclasses Opaque saved_anything_own.
-Instance: Params (@saved_anything_own) 4.
+Instance: Params (@saved_anything_own) 4 := {}.
 
 Section saved_anything.
   Context `{savedAnythingG Σ F}.

theories/base_logic/lib/sts.v

@@ -51,10 +51,10 @@ Section definitions.
   Proof. apply _. Qed.
 End definitions.
 
-Instance: Params (@sts_inv) 4.
-Instance: Params (@sts_ownS) 4.
-Instance: Params (@sts_own) 5.
-Instance: Params (@sts_ctx) 6.
+Instance: Params (@sts_inv) 4 := {}.
+Instance: Params (@sts_ownS) 4 := {}.
+Instance: Params (@sts_own) 5 := {}.
+Instance: Params (@sts_ctx) 6 := {}.
 
 Section sts.
   Context `{invG Σ, stsG Σ sts}.

theories/base_logic/lib/viewshifts.v

@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ Definition vs `{invG Σ} (E1 E2 : coPset) (P Q : iProp Σ) : iProp Σ :=
   (□ (P -∗ |={E1,E2}=> Q))%I.
 Arguments vs {_ _} _ _ _%I _%I.
 
-Instance: Params (@vs) 4.
+Instance: Params (@vs) 4 := {}.
 Notation "P ={ E1 , E2 }=> Q" := (vs E1 E2 P Q)
   (at level 99, E1,E2 at level 50, Q at level 200,
    format "P  ={ E1 , E2 }=>  Q") : bi_scope.

theories/base_logic/lib/wsat.v

@@ -39,18 +39,18 @@ Definition ownI `{invG Σ} (i : positive) (P : iProp Σ) : iProp Σ :=
   own invariant_name (◯ {[ i := invariant_unfold P ]}).
 Arguments ownI {_ _} _ _%I.
 Typeclasses Opaque ownI.
-Instance: Params (@invariant_unfold) 1.
-Instance: Params (@ownI) 3.
+Instance: Params (@invariant_unfold) 1 := {}.
+Instance: Params (@ownI) 3 := {}.
 
 Definition ownE `{invG Σ} (E : coPset) : iProp Σ :=
   own enabled_name (CoPset E).
 Typeclasses Opaque ownE.
-Instance: Params (@ownE) 3.
+Instance: Params (@ownE) 3 := {}.
 
 Definition ownD `{invG Σ} (E : gset positive) : iProp Σ :=
   own disabled_name (GSet E).
 Typeclasses Opaque ownD.
-Instance: Params (@ownD) 3.
+Instance: Params (@ownD) 3 := {}.
 
 Definition wsat `{invG Σ} : iProp Σ :=
   locked (∃ I : gmap positive (iProp Σ),

theories/base_logic/upred.v

@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ Record uPred (M : ucmraT) : Type := UPred {
 Bind Scope bi_scope with uPred.
 Arguments uPred_holds {_} _%I _ _ : simpl never.
 Add Printing Constructor uPred.
-Instance: Params (@uPred_holds) 3.
+Instance: Params (@uPred_holds) 3 := {}.
 
 Section cofe.
   Context {M : ucmraT}.

theories/bi/big_op.v

@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ Fixpoint big_sepL2 {PROP : bi} {A B}
   | x1 :: l1, x2 :: l2 => Φ 0 x1 x2 ∗ big_sepL2 (λ n, Φ (S n)) l1 l2
   | _, _ => False
   end%I.
-Instance: Params (@big_sepL2) 3.
+Instance: Params (@big_sepL2) 3 := {}.
 Arguments big_sepL2 {PROP A B} _ !_ !_ /.
 Typeclasses Opaque big_sepL2.
 

theories/bi/derived_connectives.v

@@ -3,24 +3,24 @@ From iris.algebra Require Import monoid.
 
 Definition bi_iff {PROP : bi} (P Q : PROP) : PROP := ((P → Q) ∧ (Q → P))%I.
 Arguments bi_iff {_} _%I _%I : simpl never.
-Instance: Params (@bi_iff) 1.
+Instance: Params (@bi_iff) 1 := {}.
 Infix "↔" := bi_iff : bi_scope.
 
 Definition bi_wand_iff {PROP : bi} (P Q : PROP) : PROP :=
   ((P -∗ Q) ∧ (Q -∗ P))%I.
 Arguments bi_wand_iff {_} _%I _%I : simpl never.
-Instance: Params (@bi_wand_iff) 1.
+Instance: Params (@bi_wand_iff) 1 := {}.
 Infix "∗-∗" := bi_wand_iff : bi_scope.
 
 Class Persistent {PROP : bi} (P : PROP) := persistent : P ⊢ <pers> P.
 Arguments Persistent {_} _%I : simpl never.
 Arguments persistent {_} _%I {_}.
 Hint Mode Persistent + ! : typeclass_instances.
-Instance: Params (@Persistent) 1.
+Instance: Params (@Persistent) 1 := {}.