tactics.v 77.6 KB
Newer Older
1
From iris.proofmode Require Import coq_tactics.
2
From iris.proofmode Require Import base intro_patterns spec_patterns sel_patterns.
3
From iris.base_logic Require Export base_logic.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
4
From iris.proofmode Require Export classes notation.
5
From iris.proofmode Require Import class_instances.
Ralf Jung's avatar
Ralf Jung committed
6
From stdpp Require Import stringmap hlist.
7
Set Default Proof Using "Type".
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
8
9

Declare Reduction env_cbv := cbv [
10
  beq ascii_beq string_beq
11
12
  env_lookup env_lookup_delete env_delete env_app env_replace env_dom
  env_persistent env_spatial env_spatial_is_nil envs_dom
13
  envs_lookup envs_lookup_delete envs_delete envs_snoc envs_app
14
15
    envs_simple_replace envs_replace envs_split
    envs_clear_spatial envs_clear_persistent
16
    envs_split_go envs_split].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
17
18
Ltac env_cbv :=
  match goal with |- ?u => let v := eval env_cbv in u in change v end.
19
Ltac env_reflexivity := env_cbv; exact eq_refl.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
20

21
(** * Misc *)
22
23
(* Tactic Notation tactics cannot return terms *)
Ltac iFresh' H :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
24
25
  lazymatch goal with
  |- of_envs ?Δ  _ =>
26
27
28
     (* [vm_compute fails] if any of the hypotheses in [Δ] contain evars, so
     first use [cbv] to compute the domain of [Δ] *)
     let Hs := eval cbv in (envs_dom Δ) in
29
30
     eval vm_compute in (fresh_string_of_set H (of_list Hs))
  | _ => H
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
31
  end.
32
Ltac iFresh := iFresh' "~".
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
33

34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
Ltac iMissingHyps Hs :=
  let Δ :=
    lazymatch goal with
    | |- of_envs ?Δ  _ => Δ
    | |- context[ envs_split _ _ ?Δ ] => Δ
    end in
  let Hhyps := eval env_cbv in (envs_dom Δ) in
  eval vm_compute in (list_difference Hs Hhyps).

43
Ltac iTypeOf H :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
44
  let Δ := match goal with |- of_envs ?Δ  _ => Δ end in
45
  eval env_cbv in (envs_lookup H Δ).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
46

47
Tactic Notation "iMatchHyp" tactic1(tac) :=
48
49
50
51
  match goal with
  | |- context[ environments.Esnoc _ ?x ?P ] => tac x P
  end.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
Class AsValid {M} (φ : Prop) (P : uPred M) := as_entails : φ  P.
Arguments AsValid {_} _%type _%I.

Instance as_valid_valid {M} (P : uPred M) : AsValid (uPred_valid P) P | 0.
Proof. by rewrite /AsValid. Qed.

Instance as_valid_entails {M} (P Q : uPred M) : AsValid (P  Q) (P - Q) | 1.
Proof. split. apply uPred.entails_wand. apply uPred.wand_entails. Qed.

Instance as_valid_equiv {M} (P Q : uPred M) : AsValid (P  Q) (P  Q).
Proof. split. apply uPred.equiv_iff. apply uPred.iff_equiv. Qed.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
64
(** * Start a proof *)
65
Ltac iStartProof :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
66
  lazymatch goal with
67
  | |- of_envs _  _ => idtac
68
  | |- ?P =>
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
69
70
    apply (proj2 (_ : AsValid P _)), tac_adequate
    || fail "iStartProof: not a uPred"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
71
72
73
74
75
  end.

(** * Context manipulation *)
Tactic Notation "iRename" constr(H1) "into" constr(H2) :=
  eapply tac_rename with _ H1 H2 _ _; (* (i:=H1) (j:=H2) *)
76
77
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iRename:" H1 "not found"
    |env_reflexivity || fail "iRename:" H2 "not fresh"|].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
78

79
80
81
82
Local Inductive esel_pat :=
  | ESelPure
  | ESelName : bool  string  esel_pat.

83
Ltac iElaborateSelPat pat :=
84
85
  let rec go pat Δ Hs :=
    lazymatch pat with
86
    | [] => eval cbv in Hs
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
    | SelPure :: ?pat => go pat Δ (ESelPure :: Hs)
    | SelPersistent :: ?pat =>
       let Hs' := eval env_cbv in (env_dom (env_persistent Δ)) in
       let Δ' := eval env_cbv in (envs_clear_persistent Δ) in
       go pat Δ' ((ESelName true <$> Hs') ++ Hs)
    | SelSpatial :: ?pat =>
       let Hs' := eval env_cbv in (env_dom (env_spatial Δ)) in
       let Δ' := eval env_cbv in (envs_clear_spatial Δ) in
       go pat Δ' ((ESelName false <$> Hs') ++ Hs)
    | SelName ?H :: ?pat =>
       lazymatch eval env_cbv in (envs_lookup_delete H Δ) with
       | Some (?p,_,?Δ') => go pat Δ' (ESelName p H :: Hs)
       | None => fail "iElaborateSelPat:" H "not found"
       end
    end in
  lazymatch goal with
  | |- of_envs ?Δ  _ =>
    let pat := sel_pat.parse pat in go pat Δ (@nil esel_pat)
  end.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
107
108
Tactic Notation "iClear" constr(Hs) :=
  let rec go Hs :=
109
    lazymatch Hs with
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
110
    | [] => idtac
111
112
    | ESelPure :: ?Hs => clear; go Hs
    | ESelName _ ?H :: ?Hs =>
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
113
       eapply tac_clear with _ H _ _; (* (i:=H) *)
114
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iClear:" H "not found"|go Hs]
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
115
    end in
116
  let Hs := iElaborateSelPat Hs in go Hs.
117

118
119
Tactic Notation "iClear" "(" ident_list(xs) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iClear Hs; clear xs.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
120
121
122

(** * Assumptions *)
Tactic Notation "iExact" constr(H) :=
123
  eapply tac_assumption with H _ _; (* (i:=H) *)
124
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iExact:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
125
126
127
    |apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- FromAssumption _ ?P _ => P end in
     fail "iExact:" H ":" P "does not match goal"].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135

Tactic Notation "iAssumptionCore" :=
  let rec find Γ i P :=
    match Γ with
    | Esnoc ?Γ ?j ?Q => first [unify P Q; unify i j| find Γ i P]
    end in
  match goal with
  | |- envs_lookup ?i (Envs ?Γp ?Γs) = Some (_, ?P) =>
136
     first [is_evar i; fail 1 | env_reflexivity]
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
137
  | |- envs_lookup ?i (Envs ?Γp ?Γs) = Some (_, ?P) =>
138
     is_evar i; first [find Γp i P | find Γs i P]; env_reflexivity
139
  | |- envs_lookup_delete ?i (Envs ?Γp ?Γs) = Some (_, ?P, _) =>
140
     first [is_evar i; fail 1 | env_reflexivity]
141
  | |- envs_lookup_delete ?i (Envs ?Γp ?Γs) = Some (_, ?P, _) =>
142
     is_evar i; first [find Γp i P | find Γs i P]; env_reflexivity
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
143
  end.
144

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
145
Tactic Notation "iAssumption" :=
146
147
148
149
  let Hass := fresh in
  let rec find p Γ Q :=
    match Γ with
    | Esnoc ?Γ ?j ?P => first
150
       [pose proof (_ : FromAssumption p P Q) as Hass;
151
        apply (tac_assumption _ j p P); [env_reflexivity|apply Hass]
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
       |find p Γ Q]
    end in
  match goal with
  | |- of_envs (Envs ?Γp ?Γs)  ?Q =>
     first [find true Γp Q | find false Γs Q
           |fail "iAssumption:" Q "not found"]
  end.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
159
160
161
162
163

(** * False *)
Tactic Notation "iExFalso" := apply tac_ex_falso.

(** * Making hypotheses persistent or pure *)
164
Local Tactic Notation "iPersistent" constr(H) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
165
  eapply tac_persistent with _ H _ _ _; (* (i:=H) *)
166
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iPersistent:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
167
    |apply _ ||
168
     let Q := match goal with |- IntoPersistent _ ?Q _ => Q end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
169
     fail "iPersistent:" Q "not persistent"
170
    |env_reflexivity|].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
171

172
Local Tactic Notation "iPure" constr(H) "as" simple_intropattern(pat) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
173
  eapply tac_pure with _ H _ _ _; (* (i:=H1) *)
174
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iPure:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
175
176
177
    |apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- IntoPure ?P _ => P end in
     fail "iPure:" P "not pure"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
178
179
    |intros pat].

180
Tactic Notation "iPureIntro" :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
181
  iStartProof;
182
  eapply tac_pure_intro;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
183
184
185
186
    [apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- FromPure ?P _ => P end in
     fail "iPureIntro:" P "not pure"
    |].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
187

188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
(** Framing *)
Local Ltac iFrameFinish :=
  lazy iota beta;
  try match goal with
  | |- _  True => exact (uPred.pure_intro _ _ I)
  end.

Local Ltac iFramePure t :=
  let φ := type of t in
  eapply (tac_frame_pure _ _ _ _ t);
    [apply _ || fail "iFrame: cannot frame" φ
    |iFrameFinish].

Local Ltac iFrameHyp H :=
  eapply tac_frame with _ H _ _ _;
203
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iFrame:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
204
205
206
    |apply _ ||
     let R := match goal with |- Frame _ ?R _ _ => R end in
     fail "iFrame: cannot frame" R
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
    |iFrameFinish].

Local Ltac iFrameAnyPure :=
  repeat match goal with H : _ |- _ => iFramePure H end.

Local Ltac iFrameAnyPersistent :=
  let rec go Hs :=
    match Hs with [] => idtac | ?H :: ?Hs => repeat iFrameHyp H; go Hs end in
  match goal with
  | |- of_envs ?Δ  _ =>
     let Hs := eval cbv in (env_dom (env_persistent Δ)) in go Hs
  end.

Local Ltac iFrameAnySpatial :=
  let rec go Hs :=
    match Hs with [] => idtac | ?H :: ?Hs => try iFrameHyp H; go Hs end in
  match goal with
  | |- of_envs ?Δ  _ =>
     let Hs := eval cbv in (env_dom (env_spatial Δ)) in go Hs
  end.

Tactic Notation "iFrame" := iFrameAnySpatial.

Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 ).
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 ).
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 ).
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 ).
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) constr(t6) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 ).
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) constr(t6) constr(t7) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 t7 ).
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) constr(t6) constr(t7) constr(t8)")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 t7 t8 ).

Tactic Notation "iFrame" constr(Hs) :=
  let rec go Hs :=
253
    lazymatch Hs with
254
    | [] => idtac
255
256
257
258
    | SelPure :: ?Hs => iFrameAnyPure; go Hs
    | SelPersistent :: ?Hs => iFrameAnyPersistent; go Hs
    | SelSpatial :: ?Hs => iFrameAnySpatial; go Hs
    | SelName ?H :: ?Hs => iFrameHyp H; go Hs
259
    end
260
  in let Hs := sel_pat.parse Hs in go Hs.
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 ) Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 ) Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4) ")"
    constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 ) Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 ) Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) constr(t6) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 ) Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) constr(t6) constr(t7) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 t7 ) Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) constr(t6) constr(t7) constr(t8)")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 t7 t8 ) Hs.

283
284
285
(** * Basic introduction tactics *)
Local Tactic Notation "iIntro" "(" simple_intropattern(x) ")" :=
  try iStartProof;
286
287
288
  lazymatch goal with
  | |- _  _ =>
    eapply tac_forall_intro;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
289
      [apply _ ||
290
291
292
293
294
       let P := match goal with |- FromForall ?P _ => P end in
       fail "iIntro: cannot turn" P "into a universal quantifier"
      |lazy beta; intros x]
  | |- _ => intros x
  end.
295
296
297
298
299
300

Local Tactic Notation "iIntro" constr(H) :=
  iStartProof;
  first
  [ (* (?Q → _) *)
    eapply tac_impl_intro with _ H; (* (i:=H) *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
301
      [env_cbv; apply _ ||
302
       let P := lazymatch goal with |- Persistent ?P => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
303
304
       fail 1 "iIntro: introducing non-persistent" H ":" P
              "into non-empty spatial context"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
305
306
      |env_reflexivity || fail "iIntro:" H "not fresh"
      |]
307
308
  | (* (_ -∗ _) *)
    eapply tac_wand_intro with _ H; (* (i:=H) *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
309
310
      [env_reflexivity || fail 1 "iIntro:" H "not fresh"
      |]
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
  | fail 1 "iIntro: nothing to introduce" ].

Local Tactic Notation "iIntro" "#" constr(H) :=
  iStartProof;
  first
  [ (* (?P → _) *)
    eapply tac_impl_intro_persistent with _ H _; (* (i:=H) *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
318
      [apply _ || 
319
       let P := match goal with |- IntoPersistent _ ?P _ => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
320
321
322
       fail 1 "iIntro: " P " not persistent"
      |env_reflexivity || fail 1 "iIntro:" H "not fresh"
      |]
323
324
  | (* (?P -∗ _) *)
    eapply tac_wand_intro_persistent with _ H _; (* (i:=H) *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
325
      [apply _ || 
326
       let P := match goal with |- IntoPersistent _ ?P _ => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
327
328
329
       fail 1 "iIntro: " P " not persistent"
      |env_reflexivity || fail 1 "iIntro:" H "not fresh"
      |]
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
  | fail 1 "iIntro: nothing to introduce" ].

Local Tactic Notation "iIntro" "_" :=
  try iStartProof;
  first
  [ (* (?Q → _) *) apply tac_impl_intro_drop
  | (* (_ -∗ _) *) apply tac_wand_intro_drop
  | (* (∀ _, _) *) iIntro (_)
  | fail 1 "iIntro: nothing to introduce" ].

Local Tactic Notation "iIntroForall" :=
  try iStartProof;
  lazymatch goal with
  | |-  _, ?P => fail
  | |-  _, _ => intro
  | |- _  ( x : _, _) => let x' := fresh x in iIntro (x')
  end.
Local Tactic Notation "iIntro" :=
  try iStartProof;
  lazymatch goal with
  | |- _  ?P => intro
  | |- _  (_ - _) => iIntro (?) || let H := iFresh in iIntro #H || iIntro H
  | |- _  (_  _) => iIntro (?) || let H := iFresh in iIntro #H || iIntro H
  end.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
355
(** * Specialize *)
356
357
358
359
360
Record iTrm {X As} :=
  ITrm { itrm : X ; itrm_vars : hlist As ; itrm_hyps : string }.
Arguments ITrm {_ _} _ _ _.

Notation "( H $! x1 .. xn )" :=
361
  (ITrm H (hcons x1 .. (hcons xn hnil) ..) "") (at level 0, x1, xn at level 9).
362
Notation "( H $! x1 .. xn 'with' pat )" :=
363
  (ITrm H (hcons x1 .. (hcons xn hnil) ..) pat) (at level 0, x1, xn at level 9).
364
365
Notation "( H 'with' pat )" := (ITrm H hnil pat) (at level 0).

366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
(*
There is some hacky stuff going on here (most probably there is a Coq bug).
Holes -- like unresolved type class instances -- in the argument `xs` are
resolved at arbitrary moments. It seems that tactics like `apply`, `split` and
`eexists` trigger type class search to resolve these holes. To avoid TC being
triggered too eagerly, this tactic uses `refine` at various places instead of
`apply`.

TODO: Investigate what really is going on. Is there a related to Cog bug #5752?
When should holes in an `open_constr` be resolved?
*)
377
Local Tactic Notation "iSpecializeArgs" constr(H) open_constr(xs) :=
378
  let rec go xs :=
379
    lazymatch xs with
380
    | hnil => apply id (* Finally, trigger TC *)
381
    | hcons ?x ?xs =>
382
       eapply tac_forall_specialize with _ H _ _ _; (* (i:=H) (a:=x) *)
383
384
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H "not found"
         |typeclasses eauto ||
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
385
          let P := match goal with |- IntoForall ?P _ => P end in
386
387
388
389
          fail "iSpecialize: cannot instantiate" P "with" x
         |lazymatch goal with (* Force [A] in [ex_intro] to deal with coercions. *)
          | |-  _ : ?A, _ => refine (@ex_intro A _ x (conj _ _))
          end; [env_reflexivity|go xs]]
390
391
    end in
  go xs.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
392

393
Local Tactic Notation "iSpecializePat" open_constr(H) constr(pat) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
394
  let solve_to_wand H1 :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
395
    apply _ ||
396
    let P := match goal with |- IntoWand _ ?P _ _ => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
397
    fail "iSpecialize:" P "not an implication/wand" in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
398
399
400
  let rec go H1 pats :=
    lazymatch pats with
    | [] => idtac
401
402
403
    | SForall :: ?pats =>
       idtac "the * specialization pattern is deprecated because it is applied implicitly";
       go H1 pats
404
    | SName ?H2 :: ?pats =>
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
405
       eapply tac_specialize with _ _ H2 _ H1 _ _ _ _; (* (j:=H1) (i:=H2) *)
406
407
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H2 "not found"
         |env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H1 "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
408
         |apply _ ||
409
410
          let P := match goal with |- IntoWand _ ?P ?Q _ => P end in
          let Q := match goal with |- IntoWand _ ?P ?Q _ => Q end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
411
          fail "iSpecialize: cannot instantiate" P "with" Q
412
         |env_reflexivity|go H1 pats]
413
414
    | SPureGoal ?d :: ?pats =>
       eapply tac_specialize_assert_pure with _ H1 _ _ _ _ _;
415
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H1 "not found"
416
         |solve_to_wand H1
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
417
418
419
         |apply _ ||
          let Q := match goal with |- FromPure ?Q _ => Q end in
          fail "iSpecialize:" Q "not pure"
420
         |env_reflexivity
421
         |done_if d (*goal*)
422
         |go H1 pats]
423
424
    | SGoal (SpecGoal GPersistent false ?Hs_frame [] ?d) :: ?pats =>
       eapply tac_specialize_assert_persistent with _ _ H1 _ _ _ _;
425
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H1 "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
426
         |solve_to_wand H1
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
427
         |apply _ ||
428
          let Q := match goal with |- Persistent ?Q => Q end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
429
          fail "iSpecialize:" Q "not persistent"
430
         |env_reflexivity
431
         |iFrame Hs_frame; done_if d (*goal*)
432
         |go H1 pats]
433
434
435
    | SGoal (SpecGoal GPersistent _ _ _ _) :: ?pats =>
       fail "iSpecialize: cannot select hypotheses for persistent premise"
    | SGoal (SpecGoal ?m ?lr ?Hs_frame ?Hs ?d) :: ?pats =>
436
       let Hs' := eval cbv in (if lr then Hs else Hs_frame ++ Hs) in
437
       eapply tac_specialize_assert with _ _ _ H1 _ lr Hs' _ _ _ _;
438
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H1 "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
439
         |solve_to_wand H1
440
441
442
         |lazymatch m with
          | GSpatial => apply elim_modal_dummy
          | GModal => apply _ || fail "iSpecialize: goal not a modality"
443
          end
444
445
         |env_reflexivity ||
          let Hs' := iMissingHyps Hs' in
446
          fail "iSpecialize: hypotheses" Hs' "not found"
447
         |iFrame Hs_frame; done_if d (*goal*)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
448
         |go H1 pats]
449
450
    | SAutoFrame GPersistent :: ?pats =>
       eapply tac_specialize_assert_persistent with _ _ H1 _ _ _ _;
451
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H1 "not found"
452
         |solve_to_wand H1
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
453
         |apply _ ||
454
          let Q := match goal with |- Persistent ?Q => Q end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
455
          fail "iSpecialize:" Q "not persistent"
456
         |env_reflexivity
457
458
459
460
         |solve [iFrame "∗ #"]
         |go H1 pats]
    | SAutoFrame ?m :: ?pats =>
       eapply tac_specialize_frame with _ H1 _ _ _ _ _ _;
461
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H1 "not found"
462
463
464
465
466
         |solve_to_wand H1
         |lazymatch m with
          | GSpatial => apply elim_modal_dummy
          | GModal => apply _ || fail "iSpecialize: goal not a modality"
          end
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
467
468
         |iFrame "∗ #"; apply tac_unlock ||
          fail "iSpecialize: premise cannot be solved by framing"
469
         |reflexivity]; iIntro H1; go H1 pats
470
471
    end in let pats := spec_pat.parse pat in go H pats.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
472
(* The argument [p] denotes whether the conclusion of the specialized term is
473
474
475
persistent. If so, one can use all spatial hypotheses for both proving the
premises and the remaning goal. The argument [p] can either be a Boolean or an
introduction pattern, which will be coerced into [true] when it solely contains
476
477
478
479
480
`#` or `%` patterns at the top-level.

In case the specialization pattern in [t] states that the modality of the goal
should be kept for one of the premises (i.e. [>[H1 .. Hn]] is used) then [p]
defaults to [false] (i.e. spatial hypotheses are not preserved). *)
481
Tactic Notation "iSpecializeCore" open_constr(t) "as" constr(p) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
482
  let p := intro_pat_persistent p in
483
484
  let t :=
    match type of t with string => constr:(ITrm t hnil "") | _ => t end in
485
486
  lazymatch t with
  | ITrm ?H ?xs ?pat =>
487
    let pat := spec_pat.parse pat in
488
489
    lazymatch type of H with
    | string =>
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
      (* The lemma [tac_specialize_persistent_helper] allows one to use all
      spatial hypotheses for both proving the premises of the lemma we
      specialize as well as those of the remaining goal. We can only use it when
      the result of the specialization is persistent, and no modality is
      eliminated. As an optimization, we do not use this when only universal
      quantifiers are instantiated. *)
      lazymatch eval compute in
        (bool_decide (pat  []) && p && negb (existsb spec_pat_modal pat)) with
498
499
      | true =>
         eapply tac_specialize_persistent_helper with _ H _ _ _;
500
           [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H "not found"
501
           |iSpecializeArgs H xs; iSpecializePat H pat; last (iExact H)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
502
           |apply _ ||
503
            let Q := match goal with |- Persistent ?Q => Q end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
504
            fail "iSpecialize:" Q "not persistent"
505
           |env_reflexivity|(* goal *)]
506
      | false => iSpecializeArgs H xs; iSpecializePat H pat
507
508
      end
    | _ => fail "iSpecialize:" H "should be a hypothesis, use iPoseProof instead"
509
    end
510
  | _ => fail "iSpecialize:" t "should be a proof mode term"
511
  end.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
512

513
Tactic Notation "iSpecialize" open_constr(t) :=
514
515
516
  iSpecializeCore t as false.
Tactic Notation "iSpecialize" open_constr(t) "as" "#" :=
  iSpecializeCore t as true.
517

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
518
(** * Pose proof *)
519
520
(* The tactic [iIntoValid] tactic solves a goal [uPred_valid Q]. The
arguments [t] is a Coq term whose type is of the following shape:
521

522
- [∀ (x_1 : A_1) .. (x_n : A_n), uPred_valid Q]
523
- [∀ (x_1 : A_1) .. (x_n : A_n), P1 ⊢ P2], in which case [Q] becomes [P1 -∗ P2]
524
525
526
527
- [∀ (x_1 : A_1) .. (x_n : A_n), P1 ⊣⊢ P2], in which case [Q] becomes [P1 ↔ P2]

The tactic instantiates each dependent argument [x_i] with an evar and generates
a goal [P] for non-dependent arguments [x_i : P]. *)
528
Tactic Notation "iIntoValid" open_constr(t) :=
529
  let rec go t :=
530
    let tT := type of t in
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
    lazymatch eval hnf in tT with
    | ?P  ?Q => let H := fresh in assert P as H; [|go uconstr:(t H); clear H]
    |  _ : ?T, _ =>
      (* Put [T] inside an [id] to avoid TC inference from being invoked. *)
      (* This is a workarround for Coq bug #4969. *)
      let e := fresh in evar (e:id T);
      let e' := eval unfold e in e in clear e; go (t e')
    | _ =>
      let tT' := eval cbv zeta in tT in apply (proj1 (_ : AsValid tT' _) t)
      || fail "iPoseProof: not a uPred"
    end in
542
  go t.
543

544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
(* The tactic [tac] is called with a temporary fresh name [H]. The argument
[lazy_tc] denotes whether type class inference on the premises of [lem] should
be performed before (if false) or after (if true) [tac H] is called. *)
Tactic Notation "iPoseProofCore" open_constr(lem)
    "as" constr(p) constr(lazy_tc) tactic(tac) :=
  try iStartProof;
  let Htmp := iFresh in
  let t :=
    lazymatch lem with ITrm ?t ?xs ?pat => t | _ => lem end in
  let spec_tac _ :=
    lazymatch lem with
    | ITrm ?t ?xs ?pat => iSpecializeCore (ITrm Htmp xs pat) as p
    | _ => idtac
    end in
  let go goal_tac :=
559
560
561
    lazymatch type of t with
    | string =>
       eapply tac_pose_proof_hyp with _ _ t _ Htmp _;
562
563
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iPoseProof:" t "not found"
         |env_reflexivity || fail "iPoseProof:" Htmp "not fresh"
564
         |goal_tac ()]
565
566
    | _ =>
       eapply tac_pose_proof with _ Htmp _; (* (j:=H) *)
567
         [iIntoValid t
568
         |env_reflexivity || fail "iPoseProof:" Htmp "not fresh"
569
         |goal_tac ()]
570
    end;
571
572
573
574
    try (apply _) in
  lazymatch eval compute in lazy_tc with
  | true => go ltac:(fun _ => spec_tac (); last (tac Htmp))
  | false => go spec_tac; last (tac Htmp)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
575
576
577
  end.

(** * Apply *)
578
Tactic Notation "iApplyHyp" constr(H) :=
579
580
  let rec go H := first
    [eapply tac_apply with _ H _ _ _;
581
      [env_reflexivity
582
583
      |apply _
      |lazy beta (* reduce betas created by instantiation *)]
584
    |iSpecializePat H "[]"; last go H] in
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
  iExact H ||
  go H ||
  lazymatch iTypeOf H with
  | Some (_,?Q) => fail "iApply: cannot apply" Q
  end.

Tactic Notation "iApply" open_constr(lem) :=
  iPoseProofCore lem as false true (fun H => iApplyHyp H).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
593
594

(** * Revert *)
595
Local Tactic Notation "iForallRevert" ident(x) :=
596
597
598
599
600
601
  let err x :=
    intros x;
    iMatchHyp (fun H P =>
      lazymatch P with
      | context [x] => fail 2 "iRevert:" x "is used in hypothesis" H
      end) in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
602
  iStartProof;
603
604
  let A := type of x in
  lazymatch type of A with
605
606
607
  | Prop => revert x; first [apply tac_pure_revert|err x]
  | _ => revert x; first [apply tac_forall_revert|err x]
  end.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
608
609

Tactic Notation "iRevert" constr(Hs) :=
610
611
  let rec go Hs :=
    lazymatch Hs with
612
    | [] => idtac
613
614
615
616
617
    | ESelPure :: ?Hs =>
       repeat match goal with x : _ |- _ => revert x end;
       go Hs
    | ESelName _ ?H :: ?Hs =>
       eapply tac_revert with _ H _ _; (* (i:=H2) *)
618
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iRevert:" H "not found"
619
         |env_cbv; go Hs]
620
    end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
621
  let Hs := iElaborateSelPat Hs in iStartProof; go Hs.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
622

623
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ")" :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
624
  iForallRevert x1.
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x2; iRevert ( x1 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x3; iRevert ( x1 x2 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x4; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x5; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ident(x6) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x6; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ident(x6) ident(x7) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x7; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ident(x6) ident(x7) ident(x8) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x8; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 ).

Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4) ")"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
651
    constr(Hs) :=
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ident(x6) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ident(x6) ident(x7) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ident(x6) ident(x7) ident(x8) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 x8 ).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
665
666
667

(** * Disjunction *)
Tactic Notation "iLeft" :=
668
  iStartProof;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
669
  eapply tac_or_l;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
670
671
672
673
    [apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- FromOr ?P _ _ => P end in
     fail "iLeft:" P "not a disjunction"
    |].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
674
Tactic Notation "iRight" :=
675
  iStartProof;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
676
  eapply tac_or_r;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
677
678
679
680
    [apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- FromOr ?P _ _ => P end in
     fail "iRight:" P "not a disjunction"
    |].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
681

682
Local Tactic Notation "iOrDestruct" constr(H) "as" constr(H1) constr(H2) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
683
  eapply tac_or_destruct with _ _ H _ H1 H2 _ _ _; (* (i:=H) (j1:=H1) (j2:=H2) *)
684
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iOrDestruct:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
685
686
687
    |apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- IntoOr ?P _ _ => P end in
     fail "iOrDestruct: cannot destruct" P
688
    |env_reflexivity || fail "iOrDestruct:" H1 "not fresh"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
689
690
    |env_reflexivity || fail "iOrDestruct:" H2 "not fresh"
    | |].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
691
692
693

(** * Conjunction and separating conjunction *)
Tactic Notation "iSplit" :=
694
  iStartProof;
695
696
697
  lazymatch goal with
  | |- _  _ =>
    eapply tac_and_split;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
698
      [apply _ ||
699
       let P := match goal with |- FromAnd _ ?P _ _ => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
700
       fail "iSplit:" P "not a conjunction"| |]
701
  end.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
702
703

Tactic Notation "iSplitL" constr(Hs) :=
704
  iStartProof;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
705
  let Hs := words Hs in
706
  eapply tac_sep_split with _ _ Left Hs _ _; (* (js:=Hs) *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
707
    [apply _ ||
708
     let P := match goal with |- FromAnd _ ?P _ _ => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
709
     fail "iSplitL:" P "not a separating conjunction"
710
711
    |env_reflexivity ||
     let Hs := iMissingHyps Hs in
712
     fail "iSplitL: hypotheses" Hs "not found"
713
714
    | |].

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
715
Tactic Notation "iSplitR" constr(Hs) :=
716
  iStartProof;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
717
  let Hs := words Hs in
718
  eapply tac_sep_split with _ _ Right Hs _ _; (* (js:=Hs) *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
719
    [apply _ ||
720
     let P := match goal with |- FromAnd _ ?P _ _ => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
721
     fail "iSplitR:" P "not a separating conjunction"
722
723
    |env_reflexivity ||
     let Hs := iMissingHyps Hs in
724
     fail "iSplitR: hypotheses" Hs "not found"
725
    | |].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
726
727
728
729

Tactic Notation "iSplitL" := iSplitR "".
Tactic Notation "iSplitR" := iSplitL "".

730
731
Local Tactic Notation "iAndDestruct" constr(H) "as" constr(H1) constr(H2) :=
  eapply tac_and_destruct with _ H _ H1 H2 _ _ _; (* (i:=H) (j1:=H1) (j2:=H2) *)
732
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iAndDestruct:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
733
734
735
    |apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- IntoAnd _ ?P _ _ => P end in
     fail "iAndDestruct: cannot destruct" P
736
    |env_reflexivity || fail "iAndDestruct:" H1 "or" H2 " not fresh"|].
737

738
739
Local Tactic Notation "iAndDestructChoice" constr(H) "as" constr(d) constr(H') :=
  eapply tac_and_destruct_choice with _ H _ d H' _ _ _;
740
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iAndDestructChoice:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
741
742
743
    |apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- IntoAnd _ ?P _ _ => P end in
     fail "iAndDestructChoice: cannot destruct" P
744
    |env_reflexivity || fail "iAndDestructChoice:" H' " not fresh"|].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
745

746
747
748
749
(** * Combinining hypotheses *)
Tactic Notation "iCombine" constr(Hs) "as" constr(H) :=
  let Hs := words Hs in
  eapply tac_combine with _ _ Hs _ _ H _;
750
751
    [env_reflexivity ||
     let Hs := iMissingHyps Hs in
752
     fail "iCombine: hypotheses" Hs "not found"
753
    |apply _
754
    |env_reflexivity || fail "iCombine:" H "not fresh"|].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
755

756
757
758
Tactic Notation "iCombine" constr(H1) constr(H2) "as" constr(H) :=
  iCombine [H1;H2] as H.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
759
(** * Existential *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
760
Tactic Notation "iExists" uconstr(x1) :=
761
  iStartProof;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
762
  eapply tac_exist;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
763
764
765
    [apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- FromExist ?P _ => P end in
     fail "iExists:" P "not an existential"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
766
    |cbv beta; eexists x1].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
767

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
768
Tactic Notation "iExists" uconstr(x1) "," uconstr(x2) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
769
  iExists x1; iExists x2.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
770
Tactic Notation "iExists" uconstr(x1) "," uconstr(x2) "," uconstr(x3) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
771
  iExists x1; iExists x2, x3.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
772
773
Tactic Notation "iExists" uconstr(x1) "," uconstr(x2) "," uconstr(x3) ","
    uconstr(x4) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
774
  iExists x1; iExists x2, x3, x4.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
775
776
Tactic Notation "iExists" uconstr(x1) "," uconstr(x2) "," uconstr(x3) ","
    uconstr(x4) "," uconstr(x5) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
777
  iExists x1; iExists x2, x3, x4, x5.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
778
779
Tactic Notation "iExists" uconstr(x1) "," uconstr(x2) "," uconstr(x3) ","
    uconstr(x4) "," uconstr(x5) "," uconstr(x6) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
780
  iExists x1; iExists x2, x3, x4, x5, x6.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
781
782
Tactic Notation "iExists" uconstr(x1) "," uconstr(x2) "," uconstr(x3) ","
    uconstr(x4) "," uconstr(x5) "," uconstr(x6) "," uconstr(x7) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
783
  iExists x1; iExists x2, x3, x4, x5, x6, x7.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
784
785
786
Tactic Notation "iExists" uconstr(x1) "," uconstr(x2) "," uconstr(x3) ","
    uconstr(x4) "," uconstr(x5) "," uconstr(x6) "," uconstr(x7) ","
    uconstr(x8) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
787
788
  iExists x1; iExists x2, x3, x4, x5, x6, x7, x8.

789
790
Local Tactic Notation "iExistDestruct" constr(H)
    "as" simple_intropattern(x) constr(Hx) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
791
  eapply tac_exist_destruct with H _ Hx _ _; (* (i:=H) (j:=Hx) *)
792
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iExistDestruct:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
793
794
795
    |apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- IntoExist ?P _ => P end in
     fail "iExistDestruct: cannot destruct" P|];
796
797
  let y := fresh in
  intros y; eexists; split;
798
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iExistDestruct:" Hx "not fresh"
799
    |revert y; intros x].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
800

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
801
802
(** * Always *)
Tactic Notation "iAlways":=
803
  iStartProof;
804
805
806
807
  eapply tac_always_intro;
    [apply _ || fail "iAlways: the goal is not a persistence/plainness modality"
    |env_cbv; apply _
    |].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
808
809

(** * Later *)
810
Tactic Notation "iNext" open_constr(n) :=
811
  iStartProof;
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
  let P := match goal with |- _  ?P => P end in
  try lazymatch n with 0 => fail 1 "iNext: cannot strip 0 laters" end;
  eapply (tac_next _ _ n);
    [apply _ || fail "iNext:" P "does not contain" n "laters"
    |lazymatch goal with
     | |- IntoLaterNEnvs 0 _ _ => fail "iNext:" P "does not contain laters"
     | _ => apply _
819
820
     end
    |lazy beta (* remove beta redexes caused by removing laters under binders*)].
821
822

Tactic Notation "iNext":= iNext _.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
823

824
(** * Update modality *)
825
Tactic Notation "iModIntro" :=
826
  iStartProof;
827
  eapply tac_modal_intro;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed