tactics.v 79.5 KB
Newer Older
1 2
From iris.proofmode Require Import coq_tactics.
From iris.proofmode Require Import intro_patterns spec_patterns sel_patterns.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
3
From iris.bi Require Export bi.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
4
From iris.proofmode Require Export classes notation.
5
From iris.proofmode Require Import class_instances.
Ralf Jung's avatar
Ralf Jung committed
6
From stdpp Require Import stringmap hlist.
7
From iris.proofmode Require Import strings.
8
Set Default Proof Using "Type".
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
9 10

Declare Reduction env_cbv := cbv [
11
  beq ascii_beq string_beq
12 13
  env_lookup env_lookup_delete env_delete env_app env_replace env_dom
  env_persistent env_spatial env_spatial_is_nil envs_dom
14
  envs_lookup envs_lookup_delete envs_delete envs_snoc envs_app
15 16
    envs_simple_replace envs_replace envs_split
    envs_clear_spatial envs_clear_persistent
17
    envs_split_go envs_split].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
18 19
Ltac env_cbv :=
  match goal with |- ?u => let v := eval env_cbv in u in change v end.
20
Ltac env_reflexivity := env_cbv; exact eq_refl.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
21

22
(** * Misc *)
23 24
(* Tactic Notation tactics cannot return terms *)
Ltac iFresh' H :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
25 26
  lazymatch goal with
  |- of_envs ?Δ  _ =>
27 28 29
     (* [vm_compute fails] if any of the hypotheses in [Δ] contain evars, so
     first use [cbv] to compute the domain of [Δ] *)
     let Hs := eval cbv in (envs_dom Δ) in
30 31
     eval vm_compute in (fresh_string_of_set H (of_list Hs))
  | _ => H
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
32
  end.
33
Ltac iFresh := iFresh' "~".
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
34

35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43
Ltac iMissingHyps Hs :=
  let Δ :=
    lazymatch goal with
    | |- of_envs ?Δ  _ => Δ
    | |- context[ envs_split _ _ ?Δ ] => Δ
    end in
  let Hhyps := eval env_cbv in (envs_dom Δ) in
  eval vm_compute in (list_difference Hs Hhyps).

44
Ltac iTypeOf H :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
45
  let Δ := match goal with |- of_envs ?Δ  _ => Δ end in
46
  eval env_cbv in (envs_lookup H Δ).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
47

48
Tactic Notation "iMatchHyp" tactic1(tac) :=
49 50 51 52
  match goal with
  | |- context[ environments.Esnoc _ ?x ?P ] => tac x P
  end.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
53
Class AsValid {PROP : bi} (φ : Prop) (P : PROP) := as_entails : φ  P.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
54 55
Arguments AsValid {_} _%type _%I.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
56
Instance as_valid_valid {PROP : bi} (P : PROP) : AsValid (bi_valid P) P | 0.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
57 58
Proof. by rewrite /AsValid. Qed.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
59 60
Instance as_valid_entails {PROP : bi} (P Q : PROP) : AsValid (P  Q) (P - Q) | 1.
Proof. split. apply bi.entails_wand. apply bi.wand_entails. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
61

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
62 63
Instance as_valid_equiv {PROP : bi} (P Q : PROP) : AsValid (P  Q) (P - Q).
Proof. split. apply bi.equiv_wand_iff. apply bi.wand_iff_equiv. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
64

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
65
(** * Start a proof *)
66
Ltac iStartProof :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
67
  lazymatch goal with
68
  | |- of_envs _  _ => idtac
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
69
  | |- let _ := _ in _ => fail
70
  | |- ?P =>
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
71
    apply (proj2 (_ : AsValid P _)), tac_adequate
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
72
    || fail "iStartProof: not a BI entailment"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
73 74 75 76 77
  end.

(** * Context manipulation *)
Tactic Notation "iRename" constr(H1) "into" constr(H2) :=
  eapply tac_rename with _ H1 H2 _ _; (* (i:=H1) (j:=H2) *)
78 79
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iRename:" H1 "not found"
    |env_reflexivity || fail "iRename:" H2 "not fresh"|].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
80

81 82 83 84
Local Inductive esel_pat :=
  | ESelPure
  | ESelName : bool  string  esel_pat.

85
Ltac iElaborateSelPat pat :=
86 87
  let rec go pat Δ Hs :=
    lazymatch pat with
88
    | [] => eval cbv in Hs
89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108
    | SelPure :: ?pat => go pat Δ (ESelPure :: Hs)
    | SelPersistent :: ?pat =>
       let Hs' := eval env_cbv in (env_dom (env_persistent Δ)) in
       let Δ' := eval env_cbv in (envs_clear_persistent Δ) in
       go pat Δ' ((ESelName true <$> Hs') ++ Hs)
    | SelSpatial :: ?pat =>
       let Hs' := eval env_cbv in (env_dom (env_spatial Δ)) in
       let Δ' := eval env_cbv in (envs_clear_spatial Δ) in
       go pat Δ' ((ESelName false <$> Hs') ++ Hs)
    | SelName ?H :: ?pat =>
       lazymatch eval env_cbv in (envs_lookup_delete H Δ) with
       | Some (?p,_,?Δ') => go pat Δ' (ESelName p H :: Hs)
       | None => fail "iElaborateSelPat:" H "not found"
       end
    end in
  lazymatch goal with
  | |- of_envs ?Δ  _ =>
    let pat := sel_pat.parse pat in go pat Δ (@nil esel_pat)
  end.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
109 110
Tactic Notation "iClear" constr(Hs) :=
  let rec go Hs :=
111
    lazymatch Hs with
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
112
    | [] => idtac
113 114
    | ESelPure :: ?Hs => clear; go Hs
    | ESelName _ ?H :: ?Hs =>
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
115
       eapply tac_clear with _ H _ _; (* (i:=H) *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
116 117 118 119 120
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iClear:" H "not found"
         |env_cbv; apply _ ||
          let P := match goal with |- TCOr (Affine ?P) _ => P end in
          fail "iClear:" H ":" P "not affine and the goal not absorbing"
         |go Hs]
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
121
    end in
122
  let Hs := iElaborateSelPat Hs in go Hs.
123

124 125
Tactic Notation "iClear" "(" ident_list(xs) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iClear Hs; clear xs.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
126 127 128

(** * Assumptions *)
Tactic Notation "iExact" constr(H) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
129
  eapply tac_assumption with _ H _ _; (* (i:=H) *)
130
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iExact:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
131 132
    |apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- FromAssumption _ ?P _ => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
133 134 135
     fail "iExact:" H ":" P "does not match goal"
    |env_cbv; apply _ ||
     fail "iExact:" H "not absorbing and the remaining hypotheses not affine"].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
136 137 138

Tactic Notation "iAssumptionCore" :=
  let rec find Γ i P :=
139
    lazymatch Γ with
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
140
    | Esnoc ?Γ ?j ?Q => first [unify P Q; unify i j|find Γ i P]
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
141 142 143
    end in
  match goal with
  | |- envs_lookup ?i (Envs ?Γp ?Γs) = Some (_, ?P) =>
144
     first [is_evar i; fail 1 | env_reflexivity]
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
145
  | |- envs_lookup ?i (Envs ?Γp ?Γs) = Some (_, ?P) =>
146
     is_evar i; first [find Γp i P | find Γs i P]; env_reflexivity
147
  | |- envs_lookup_delete ?i (Envs ?Γp ?Γs) = Some (_, ?P, _) =>
148
     first [is_evar i; fail 1 | env_reflexivity]
149
  | |- envs_lookup_delete ?i (Envs ?Γp ?Γs) = Some (_, ?P, _) =>
150
     is_evar i; first [find Γp i P | find Γs i P]; env_reflexivity
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
151
  end.
152

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
153
Tactic Notation "iAssumption" :=
154 155
  let Hass := fresh in
  let rec find p Γ Q :=
156
    lazymatch Γ with
157
    | Esnoc ?Γ ?j ?P => first
158
       [pose proof (_ : FromAssumption p P Q) as Hass;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167
        eapply (tac_assumption _ _ j p P);
          [env_reflexivity
          |apply Hass
          |env_cbv; apply _ ||
           fail 1 "iAssumption:" j "not absorbing and the remaining hypotheses not affine"]
       |assert (P = False%I) as Hass by reflexivity;
        apply (tac_false_destruct _ j p P);
          [env_reflexivity
          |exact Hass]
168 169
       |find p Γ Q]
    end in
170
  lazymatch goal with
171 172 173 174
  | |- of_envs (Envs ?Γp ?Γs)  ?Q =>
     first [find true Γp Q | find false Γs Q
           |fail "iAssumption:" Q "not found"]
  end.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
175 176 177 178 179

(** * False *)
Tactic Notation "iExFalso" := apply tac_ex_falso.

(** * Making hypotheses persistent or pure *)
180
Local Tactic Notation "iPersistent" constr(H) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
181
  eapply tac_persistent with _ H _ _ _; (* (i:=H) *)
182
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iPersistent:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
183
    |apply _ ||
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
184 185 186 187 188
     let P := match goal with |- IntoPersistent _ ?P _ => P end in
     fail "iPersistent:" P "not persistent"
    |env_cbv; apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- Affine ?P => P end in
     fail "iPersistent:" P "not affine"
189
    |env_reflexivity|].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
190

191
Local Tactic Notation "iPure" constr(H) "as" simple_intropattern(pat) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
192
  eapply tac_pure with _ H _ _ _; (* (i:=H1) *)
193
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iPure:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
194 195 196
    |apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- IntoPure ?P _ => P end in
     fail "iPure:" P "not pure"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
197 198 199
    |env_cbv; apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- Affine ?P => P end in
     fail "iPure:" P "not affine"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
200 201
    |intros pat].

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
202 203 204
Tactic Notation "iEmpIntro" :=
  iStartProof;
  eapply tac_emp_intro;
205 206
    [env_cbv; apply _ ||
     fail "iEmpIntro: spatial context contains non-affine hypotheses"].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
207

208
Tactic Notation "iPureIntro" :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
209
  iStartProof;
210
  eapply tac_pure_intro;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
211 212 213 214
    [apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- FromPure ?P _ => P end in
     fail "iPureIntro:" P "not pure"
    |].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
215

216 217 218 219
(** Framing *)
Local Ltac iFrameFinish :=
  lazy iota beta;
  try match goal with
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
220 221
  | |- _  True => exact (bi.pure_intro _ _ I)
  | |- _  emp => iEmpIntro
222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231
  end.

Local Ltac iFramePure t :=
  let φ := type of t in
  eapply (tac_frame_pure _ _ _ _ t);
    [apply _ || fail "iFrame: cannot frame" φ
    |iFrameFinish].

Local Ltac iFrameHyp H :=
  eapply tac_frame with _ H _ _ _;
232
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iFrame:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
233 234 235
    |apply _ ||
     let R := match goal with |- Frame _ ?R _ _ => R end in
     fail "iFrame: cannot frame" R
236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281
    |iFrameFinish].

Local Ltac iFrameAnyPure :=
  repeat match goal with H : _ |- _ => iFramePure H end.

Local Ltac iFrameAnyPersistent :=
  let rec go Hs :=
    match Hs with [] => idtac | ?H :: ?Hs => repeat iFrameHyp H; go Hs end in
  match goal with
  | |- of_envs ?Δ  _ =>
     let Hs := eval cbv in (env_dom (env_persistent Δ)) in go Hs
  end.

Local Ltac iFrameAnySpatial :=
  let rec go Hs :=
    match Hs with [] => idtac | ?H :: ?Hs => try iFrameHyp H; go Hs end in
  match goal with
  | |- of_envs ?Δ  _ =>
     let Hs := eval cbv in (env_dom (env_spatial Δ)) in go Hs
  end.

Tactic Notation "iFrame" := iFrameAnySpatial.

Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 ).
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 ).
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 ).
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 ).
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) constr(t6) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 ).
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) constr(t6) constr(t7) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 t7 ).
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) constr(t6) constr(t7) constr(t8)")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 t7 t8 ).

Tactic Notation "iFrame" constr(Hs) :=
  let rec go Hs :=
282
    lazymatch Hs with
283
    | [] => idtac
284 285 286 287
    | SelPure :: ?Hs => iFrameAnyPure; go Hs
    | SelPersistent :: ?Hs => iFrameAnyPersistent; go Hs
    | SelSpatial :: ?Hs => iFrameAnySpatial; go Hs
    | SelName ?H :: ?Hs => iFrameHyp H; go Hs
288
    end
289
  in let Hs := sel_pat.parse Hs in go Hs.
290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 ) Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 ) Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4) ")"
    constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 ) Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 ) Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) constr(t6) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 ) Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) constr(t6) constr(t7) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 t7 ) Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) constr(t6) constr(t7) constr(t8)")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 t7 t8 ) Hs.

312 313 314
(** * Basic introduction tactics *)
Local Tactic Notation "iIntro" "(" simple_intropattern(x) ")" :=
  try iStartProof;
315 316 317
  lazymatch goal with
  | |- _  _ =>
    eapply tac_forall_intro;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
318
      [apply _ ||
319 320 321 322 323
       let P := match goal with |- FromForall ?P _ => P end in
       fail "iIntro: cannot turn" P "into a universal quantifier"
      |lazy beta; intros x]
  | |- _ => intros x
  end.
324 325 326 327 328

Local Tactic Notation "iIntro" constr(H) :=
  iStartProof;
  first
  [ (* (?Q → _) *)
329
    eapply tac_impl_intro with _ H _; (* (i:=H) *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
330
      [env_cbv; apply _ ||
331
       let P := lazymatch goal with |- Persistent ?P => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
332 333
       fail 1 "iIntro: introducing non-persistent" H ":" P
              "into non-empty spatial context"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
334
      |env_reflexivity || fail 1 "iIntro:" H "not fresh"
335
      |apply _
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
336
      |]
337 338
  | (* (_ -∗ _) *)
    eapply tac_wand_intro with _ H; (* (i:=H) *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
339 340
      [env_reflexivity || fail 1 "iIntro:" H "not fresh"
      |]
341 342 343 344 345 346 347
  | fail 1 "iIntro: nothing to introduce" ].

Local Tactic Notation "iIntro" "#" constr(H) :=
  iStartProof;
  first
  [ (* (?P → _) *)
    eapply tac_impl_intro_persistent with _ H _; (* (i:=H) *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
348
      [apply _ ||
349
       let P := match goal with |- IntoPersistent _ ?P _ => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
350
       fail 1 "iIntro:" P "not persistent"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
351 352
      |env_reflexivity || fail 1 "iIntro:" H "not fresh"
      |]
353 354
  | (* (?P -∗ _) *)
    eapply tac_wand_intro_persistent with _ H _; (* (i:=H) *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
355
      [apply _ ||
356
       let P := match goal with |- IntoPersistent _ ?P _ => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
357 358 359 360
       fail 1 "iIntro:" P "not persistent"
      |apply _ ||
       let P := match goal with |- Affine ?P => P end in
       fail 1 "iIntro:" P "not affine"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
361 362
      |env_reflexivity || fail 1 "iIntro:" H "not fresh"
      |]
363 364 365 366 367 368
  | fail 1 "iIntro: nothing to introduce" ].

Local Tactic Notation "iIntro" "_" :=
  try iStartProof;
  first
  [ (* (?Q → _) *) apply tac_impl_intro_drop
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
369 370 371 372 373 374
  | (* (_ -∗ _) *)
    apply tac_wand_intro_drop;
      [apply _ ||
       let P := match goal with |- TCOr (Affine ?P) _ => P end in
       fail 1 "iIntro:" P "not affine and the goal not absorbing"
      |]
375 376 377 378 379 380
  | (* (∀ _, _) *) iIntro (_)
  | fail 1 "iIntro: nothing to introduce" ].

Local Tactic Notation "iIntroForall" :=
  try iStartProof;
  lazymatch goal with
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
381
  | |-  _, ?P => fail (* actually an →, this is handled by iIntro below *)
382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392
  | |-  _, _ => intro
  | |- _  ( x : _, _) => let x' := fresh x in iIntro (x')
  end.
Local Tactic Notation "iIntro" :=
  try iStartProof;
  lazymatch goal with
  | |- _  ?P => intro
  | |- _  (_ - _) => iIntro (?) || let H := iFresh in iIntro #H || iIntro H
  | |- _  (_  _) => iIntro (?) || let H := iFresh in iIntro #H || iIntro H
  end.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
393
(** * Specialize *)
394 395 396 397 398
Record iTrm {X As} :=
  ITrm { itrm : X ; itrm_vars : hlist As ; itrm_hyps : string }.
Arguments ITrm {_ _} _ _ _.

Notation "( H $! x1 .. xn )" :=
399
  (ITrm H (hcons x1 .. (hcons xn hnil) ..) "") (at level 0, x1, xn at level 9).
400
Notation "( H $! x1 .. xn 'with' pat )" :=
401
  (ITrm H (hcons x1 .. (hcons xn hnil) ..) pat) (at level 0, x1, xn at level 9).
402 403
Notation "( H 'with' pat )" := (ITrm H hnil pat) (at level 0).

404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414
(*
There is some hacky stuff going on here (most probably there is a Coq bug).
Holes -- like unresolved type class instances -- in the argument `xs` are
resolved at arbitrary moments. It seems that tactics like `apply`, `split` and
`eexists` trigger type class search to resolve these holes. To avoid TC being
triggered too eagerly, this tactic uses `refine` at various places instead of
`apply`.

TODO: Investigate what really is going on. Is there a related to Cog bug #5752?
When should holes in an `open_constr` be resolved?
*)
415
Local Tactic Notation "iSpecializeArgs" constr(H) open_constr(xs) :=
416
  let rec go xs :=
417
    lazymatch xs with
418
    | hnil => apply id (* Finally, trigger TC *)
419
    | hcons ?x ?xs =>
420
       eapply tac_forall_specialize with _ H _ _ _; (* (i:=H) (a:=x) *)
421 422
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H "not found"
         |typeclasses eauto ||
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
423
          let P := match goal with |- IntoForall ?P _ => P end in
424 425 426 427
          fail "iSpecialize: cannot instantiate" P "with" x
         |lazymatch goal with (* Force [A] in [ex_intro] to deal with coercions. *)
          | |-  _ : ?A, _ => refine (@ex_intro A _ x (conj _ _))
          end; [env_reflexivity|go xs]]
428 429
    end in
  go xs.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
430

431
Local Tactic Notation "iSpecializePat" open_constr(H) constr(pat) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
432
  let solve_to_wand H1 :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
433
    apply _ ||
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
434
    let P := match goal with |- IntoWand _ _ ?P _ _ => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
435
    fail "iSpecialize:" P "not an implication/wand" in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
436 437 438
  let rec go H1 pats :=
    lazymatch pats with
    | [] => idtac
439 440 441
    | SForall :: ?pats =>
       idtac "the * specialization pattern is deprecated because it is applied implicitly";
       go H1 pats
442
    | SName ?H2 :: ?pats =>
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
443
       eapply tac_specialize with _ _ H2 _ H1 _ _ _ _; (* (j:=H1) (i:=H2) *)
444 445
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H2 "not found"
         |env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H1 "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
446
         |apply _ ||
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
447 448
          let P := match goal with |- IntoWand _ _ ?P ?Q _ => P end in
          let Q := match goal with |- IntoWand _ _ ?P ?Q _ => Q end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
449
          fail "iSpecialize: cannot instantiate" P "with" Q
450
         |env_reflexivity|go H1 pats]
451 452
    | SPureGoal ?d :: ?pats =>
       eapply tac_specialize_assert_pure with _ H1 _ _ _ _ _;
453
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H1 "not found"
454
         |solve_to_wand H1
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
455 456 457
         |apply _ ||
          let Q := match goal with |- FromPure ?Q _ => Q end in
          fail "iSpecialize:" Q "not pure"
458
         |env_reflexivity
459
         |done_if d (*goal*)
460
         |go H1 pats]
461 462
    | SGoal (SpecGoal GPersistent false ?Hs_frame [] ?d) :: ?pats =>
       eapply tac_specialize_assert_persistent with _ _ H1 _ _ _ _;
463
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H1 "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
464
         |solve_to_wand H1
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
465
         |apply _ ||
466
          let Q := match goal with |- Persistent ?Q => Q end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
467
          fail "iSpecialize:" Q "not persistent"
468
         |env_reflexivity
469
         |iFrame Hs_frame; done_if d (*goal*)
470
         |go H1 pats]
471 472 473
    | SGoal (SpecGoal GPersistent _ _ _ _) :: ?pats =>
       fail "iSpecialize: cannot select hypotheses for persistent premise"
    | SGoal (SpecGoal ?m ?lr ?Hs_frame ?Hs ?d) :: ?pats =>
474
       let Hs' := eval cbv in (if lr then Hs else Hs_frame ++ Hs) in
475
       eapply tac_specialize_assert with _ _ _ H1 _ lr Hs' _ _ _ _;
476
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H1 "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
477
         |solve_to_wand H1
478 479 480
         |lazymatch m with
          | GSpatial => apply elim_modal_dummy
          | GModal => apply _ || fail "iSpecialize: goal not a modality"
481
          end
482 483
         |env_reflexivity ||
          let Hs' := iMissingHyps Hs' in
484
          fail "iSpecialize: hypotheses" Hs' "not found"
485
         |iFrame Hs_frame; done_if d (*goal*)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
486
         |go H1 pats]
487 488
    | SAutoFrame GPersistent :: ?pats =>
       eapply tac_specialize_assert_persistent with _ _ H1 _ _ _ _;
489
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H1 "not found"
490
         |solve_to_wand H1
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
491
         |apply _ ||
492
          let Q := match goal with |- Persistent ?Q => Q end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
493
          fail "iSpecialize:" Q "not persistent"
494
         |env_reflexivity
495 496 497 498
         |solve [iFrame "∗ #"]
         |go H1 pats]
    | SAutoFrame ?m :: ?pats =>
       eapply tac_specialize_frame with _ H1 _ _ _ _ _ _;
499
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H1 "not found"
500 501 502 503 504
         |solve_to_wand H1
         |lazymatch m with
          | GSpatial => apply elim_modal_dummy
          | GModal => apply _ || fail "iSpecialize: goal not a modality"
          end
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
505 506
         |iFrame "∗ #"; apply tac_unlock ||
          fail "iSpecialize: premise cannot be solved by framing"
507
         |reflexivity]; iIntro H1; go H1 pats
508 509
    end in let pats := spec_pat.parse pat in go H pats.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
510
(* The argument [p] denotes whether the conclusion of the specialized term is
511 512 513
persistent. If so, one can use all spatial hypotheses for both proving the
premises and the remaning goal. The argument [p] can either be a Boolean or an
introduction pattern, which will be coerced into [true] when it solely contains
514 515 516 517 518
`#` or `%` patterns at the top-level.

In case the specialization pattern in [t] states that the modality of the goal
should be kept for one of the premises (i.e. [>[H1 .. Hn]] is used) then [p]
defaults to [false] (i.e. spatial hypotheses are not preserved). *)
519
Tactic Notation "iSpecializeCore" open_constr(t) "as" constr(p) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
520
  let p := intro_pat_persistent p in
521 522
  let t :=
    match type of t with string => constr:(ITrm t hnil "") | _ => t end in
523 524
  lazymatch t with
  | ITrm ?H ?xs ?pat =>
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
525
    iSpecializeArgs H xs;
526 527
    lazymatch type of H with
    | string =>
528 529 530 531 532 533
      (* The lemma [tac_specialize_persistent_helper] allows one to use all
      spatial hypotheses for both proving the premises of the lemma we
      specialize as well as those of the remaining goal. We can only use it when
      the result of the specialization is persistent, and no modality is
      eliminated. As an optimization, we do not use this when only universal
      quantifiers are instantiated. *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
534
      let pat := spec_pat.parse pat in
535
      lazymatch eval compute in
536
        (p && bool_decide (pat  []) && negb (existsb spec_pat_modal pat)) with
537
      | true =>
538
         (* FIXME: do something reasonable when the BI is not positive *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
539
         eapply tac_specialize_persistent_helper with _ H _ _ _ _;
540
           [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
541
           |iSpecializePat H pat; last (iExact H)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
542
           |apply _ ||
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
543
            let Q := match goal with |- IntoPersistent _ ?Q _ => Q end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
544
            fail "iSpecialize:" Q "not persistent"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
545
           |env_cbv; apply _ ||
546
            let Q := match goal with |- TCAnd _ (Affine ?Q) => Q end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
547 548 549 550
            fail "iSpecialize:" Q "not affine"
           |env_reflexivity
           |(* goal *)]
      | false => iSpecializePat H pat
551 552
      end
    | _ => fail "iSpecialize:" H "should be a hypothesis, use iPoseProof instead"
553
    end
554
  | _ => fail "iSpecialize:" t "should be a proof mode term"
555
  end.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
556

557
Tactic Notation "iSpecialize" open_constr(t) :=
558 559 560
  iSpecializeCore t as false.
Tactic Notation "iSpecialize" open_constr(t) "as" "#" :=
  iSpecializeCore t as true.
561

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
562
(** * Pose proof *)
563 564
(* The tactic [iIntoValid] tactic solves a goal [uPred_valid Q]. The
arguments [t] is a Coq term whose type is of the following shape:
565

566
- [∀ (x_1 : A_1) .. (x_n : A_n), uPred_valid Q]
567
- [∀ (x_1 : A_1) .. (x_n : A_n), P1 ⊢ P2], in which case [Q] becomes [P1 -∗ P2]
568 569 570 571
- [∀ (x_1 : A_1) .. (x_n : A_n), P1 ⊣⊢ P2], in which case [Q] becomes [P1 ↔ P2]

The tactic instantiates each dependent argument [x_i] with an evar and generates
a goal [P] for non-dependent arguments [x_i : P]. *)
572
Tactic Notation "iIntoValid" open_constr(t) :=
573
  let rec go t :=
574
    let tT := type of t in
575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585
    lazymatch eval hnf in tT with
    | ?P  ?Q => let H := fresh in assert P as H; [|go uconstr:(t H); clear H]
    |  _ : ?T, _ =>
      (* Put [T] inside an [id] to avoid TC inference from being invoked. *)
      (* This is a workarround for Coq bug #4969. *)
      let e := fresh in evar (e:id T);
      let e' := eval unfold e in e in clear e; go (t e')
    | _ =>
      let tT' := eval cbv zeta in tT in apply (proj1 (_ : AsValid tT' _) t)
      || fail "iPoseProof: not a uPred"
    end in
586
  go t.
587

588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602
(* The tactic [tac] is called with a temporary fresh name [H]. The argument
[lazy_tc] denotes whether type class inference on the premises of [lem] should
be performed before (if false) or after (if true) [tac H] is called. *)
Tactic Notation "iPoseProofCore" open_constr(lem)
    "as" constr(p) constr(lazy_tc) tactic(tac) :=
  try iStartProof;
  let Htmp := iFresh in
  let t :=
    lazymatch lem with ITrm ?t ?xs ?pat => t | _ => lem end in
  let spec_tac _ :=
    lazymatch lem with
    | ITrm ?t ?xs ?pat => iSpecializeCore (ITrm Htmp xs pat) as p
    | _ => idtac
    end in
  let go goal_tac :=
603 604 605
    lazymatch type of t with
    | string =>
       eapply tac_pose_proof_hyp with _ _ t _ Htmp _;
606 607
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iPoseProof:" t "not found"
         |env_reflexivity || fail "iPoseProof:" Htmp "not fresh"
608
         |goal_tac ()]
609 610
    | _ =>
       eapply tac_pose_proof with _ Htmp _; (* (j:=H) *)
611
         [iIntoValid t
612
         |env_reflexivity || fail "iPoseProof:" Htmp "not fresh"
613
         |goal_tac ()]
614
    end;
615 616 617 618
    try (apply _) in
  lazymatch eval compute in lazy_tc with
  | true => go ltac:(fun _ => spec_tac (); last (tac Htmp))
  | false => go spec_tac; last (tac Htmp)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
619 620 621
  end.

(** * Apply *)
622
Tactic Notation "iApplyHyp" constr(H) :=
623 624
  let rec go H := first
    [eapply tac_apply with _ H _ _ _;
625
      [env_reflexivity
626 627
      |apply _
      |lazy beta (* reduce betas created by instantiation *)]
628
    |iSpecializePat H "[]"; last go H] in
629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636
  iExact H ||
  go H ||
  lazymatch iTypeOf H with
  | Some (_,?Q) => fail "iApply: cannot apply" Q
  end.

Tactic Notation "iApply" open_constr(lem) :=
  iPoseProofCore lem as false true (fun H => iApplyHyp H).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
637 638

(** * Revert *)
639
Local Tactic Notation "iForallRevert" ident(x) :=
640 641 642 643 644 645
  let err x :=
    intros x;
    iMatchHyp (fun H P =>
      lazymatch P with
      | context [x] => fail 2 "iRevert:" x "is used in hypothesis" H
      end) in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
646
  iStartProof;
647 648
  let A := type of x in
  lazymatch type of A with
649 650 651
  | Prop => revert x; first [apply tac_pure_revert|err x]
  | _ => revert x; first [apply tac_forall_revert|err x]
  end.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
652 653

Tactic Notation "iRevert" constr(Hs) :=
654 655
  let rec go Hs :=
    lazymatch Hs with
656
    | [] => idtac
657 658 659 660 661
    | ESelPure :: ?Hs =>
       repeat match goal with x : _ |- _ => revert x end;
       go Hs
    | ESelName _ ?H :: ?Hs =>
       eapply tac_revert with _ H _ _; (* (i:=H2) *)
662
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iRevert:" H "not found"
663
         |env_cbv; go Hs]
664
    end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
665
  let Hs := iElaborateSelPat Hs in iStartProof; go Hs.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
666

667
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ")" :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
668
  iForallRevert x1.
669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x2; iRevert ( x1 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x3; iRevert ( x1 x2 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x4; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x5; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ident(x6) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x6; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ident(x6) ident(x7) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x7; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ident(x6) ident(x7) ident(x8) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x8; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 ).

Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4) ")"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
695
    constr(Hs) :=
696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ident(x6) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ident(x6) ident(x7) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ident(x6) ident(x7) ident(x8) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 x8 ).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
709 710 711

(** * Disjunction *)
Tactic Notation "iLeft" :=
712
  iStartProof;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
713
  eapply tac_or_l;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
714 715 716 717
    [apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- FromOr ?P _ _ => P end in
     fail "iLeft:" P "not a disjunction"
    |].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
718
Tactic Notation "iRight" :=
719
  iStartProof;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
720
  eapply tac_or_r;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
721 722 723 724
    [apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- FromOr ?P _ _ => P end in
     fail "iRight:" P "not a disjunction"
    |].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
725

726
Local Tactic Notation "iOrDestruct" constr(H) "as" constr(H1) constr(H2) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
727
  eapply tac_or_destruct with _ _ H _ H1 H2 _ _ _; (* (i:=H) (j1:=H1) (j2:=H2) *)
728
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iOrDestruct:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
729 730 731
    |apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- IntoOr ?P _ _ => P end in
     fail "iOrDestruct: cannot destruct" P
732
    |env_reflexivity || fail "iOrDestruct:" H1 "not fresh"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
733 734
    |env_reflexivity || fail "iOrDestruct:" H2 "not fresh"
    | |].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
735 736 737

(** * Conjunction and separating conjunction *)
Tactic Notation "iSplit" :=
738
  iStartProof;
739 740 741
  lazymatch goal with
  | |- _  _ =>
    eapply tac_and_split;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
742
      [apply _ ||
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
743
       let P := match goal with |- FromAnd ?P _ _ => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
744
       fail "iSplit:" P "not a conjunction"| |]
745
  end.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
746 747

Tactic Notation "iSplitL" constr(Hs) :=
748
  iStartProof;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
749 750
  let Hs := words Hs in
  eapply tac_sep_split with _ _ false Hs _ _; (* (js:=Hs) *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
751
    [apply _ ||
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
752
     let P := match goal with |- FromSep _ ?P _ _ => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
753
     fail "iSplitL:" P "not a separating conjunction"
754 755
    |env_reflexivity ||
     let Hs := iMissingHyps Hs in
756
     fail "iSplitL: hypotheses" Hs "not found"
757 758
    | |].

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
759
Tactic Notation "iSplitR" constr(Hs) :=
760
  iStartProof;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
761 762
  let Hs := words Hs in
  eapply tac_sep_split with _ _ true Hs _ _; (* (js:=Hs) *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
763
    [apply _ ||
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
764
     let P := match goal with |- FromSep _ ?P _ _ => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
765
     fail "iSplitR:" P "not a separating conjunction"
766 767
    |env_reflexivity ||
     let Hs := iMissingHyps Hs in
768
     fail "iSplitR: hypotheses" Hs "not found"
769
    | |].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
770 771 772 773

Tactic Notation "iSplitL" := iSplitR "".
Tactic Notation "iSplitR" := iSplitL "".

774 775
Local Tactic Notation "iAndDestruct" constr(H) "as" constr(H1) constr(H2) :=
  eapply tac_and_destruct with _ H _ H1 H2 _ _ _; (* (i:=H) (j1:=H1) (j2:=H2) *)
776
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iAndDestruct:" H "not found"
777 778 779 780 781 782
    |env_cbv; apply _ ||
     let P :=
       lazymatch goal with
       | |- IntoSep ?P _ _ => P
       | |- IntoAnd _ ?P _ _ => P
       end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
783
     fail "iAndDestruct: cannot destruct" P
784
    |env_reflexivity || fail "iAndDestruct:" H1 "or" H2 " not fresh"|].
785