tactics.v 78.4 KB
Newer Older
1
From iris.proofmode Require Import coq_tactics.
2
From iris.proofmode Require Import base intro_patterns spec_patterns sel_patterns.
3
From iris.base_logic Require Export base_logic big_op.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
4
From iris.proofmode Require Export classes notation.
5
From iris.proofmode Require Import class_instances.
Ralf Jung's avatar
Ralf Jung committed
6
From stdpp Require Import stringmap hlist.
7
Set Default Proof Using "Type".
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
8
9

Declare Reduction env_cbv := cbv [
10
  beq ascii_beq string_beq
11
12
  env_lookup env_lookup_delete env_delete env_app env_replace env_dom
  env_persistent env_spatial env_spatial_is_nil envs_dom
13
  envs_lookup envs_lookup_delete envs_delete envs_snoc envs_app
14
15
    envs_simple_replace envs_replace envs_split
    envs_clear_spatial envs_clear_persistent
16
    envs_split_go envs_split].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
17
18
Ltac env_cbv :=
  match goal with |- ?u => let v := eval env_cbv in u in change v end.
19
Ltac env_reflexivity := env_cbv; exact eq_refl.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
20

21
(** * Misc *)
22
23
(* Tactic Notation tactics cannot return terms *)
Ltac iFresh' H :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
24
  lazymatch goal with
25
  |- envs_entails ?Δ _ =>
26
27
28
     (* [vm_compute fails] if any of the hypotheses in [Δ] contain evars, so
     first use [cbv] to compute the domain of [Δ] *)
     let Hs := eval cbv in (envs_dom Δ) in
29
30
     eval vm_compute in (fresh_string_of_set H (of_list Hs))
  | _ => H
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
31
  end.
32
Ltac iFresh := iFresh' "~".
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
33

34
35
36
Ltac iMissingHyps Hs :=
  let Δ :=
    lazymatch goal with
37
    | |- envs_entails ?Δ _ => Δ
38
39
40
41
42
    | |- context[ envs_split _ _ ?Δ ] => Δ
    end in
  let Hhyps := eval env_cbv in (envs_dom Δ) in
  eval vm_compute in (list_difference Hs Hhyps).

43
Ltac iTypeOf H :=
44
  let Δ := match goal with |- envs_entails ?Δ _ => Δ end in
45
  eval env_cbv in (envs_lookup H Δ).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
46

47
Tactic Notation "iMatchHyp" tactic1(tac) :=
48
49
50
51
  match goal with
  | |- context[ environments.Esnoc _ ?x ?P ] => tac x P
  end.

52
Class AsValid {M} (φ : Prop) (P : uPred M) := as_valid : φ  P.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
53
54
Arguments AsValid {_} _%type _%I.

55
56
57
58
59
Lemma as_valid_1 (φ : Prop) {M} (P : uPred M) `{!AsValid φ P} : φ  P.
Proof. by apply as_valid. Qed.
Lemma as_valid_2 (φ : Prop) {M} (P : uPred M) `{!AsValid φ P} : P  φ.
Proof. by apply as_valid. Qed.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
Instance as_valid_valid {M} (P : uPred M) : AsValid (uPred_valid P) P | 0.
Proof. by rewrite /AsValid. Qed.

Instance as_valid_entails {M} (P Q : uPred M) : AsValid (P  Q) (P - Q) | 1.
Proof. split. apply uPred.entails_wand. apply uPred.wand_entails. Qed.

Instance as_valid_equiv {M} (P Q : uPred M) : AsValid (P  Q) (P  Q).
Proof. split. apply uPred.equiv_iff. apply uPred.iff_equiv. Qed.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
69
(** * Start a proof *)
70
Ltac iStartProof :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
71
  lazymatch goal with
72
  | |- envs_entails _ _ => idtac
73
74
75
  | |- ?φ => eapply (as_valid_2 φ);
               [apply _ || fail "iStartProof: not a uPred"
               |apply tac_adequate]
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
76
77
78
79
80
  end.

(** * Context manipulation *)
Tactic Notation "iRename" constr(H1) "into" constr(H2) :=
  eapply tac_rename with _ H1 H2 _ _; (* (i:=H1) (j:=H2) *)
81
82
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iRename:" H1 "not found"
    |env_reflexivity || fail "iRename:" H2 "not fresh"|].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
83

84
85
86
87
Local Inductive esel_pat :=
  | ESelPure
  | ESelName : bool  string  esel_pat.

88
Ltac iElaborateSelPat pat :=
89
90
  let rec go pat Δ Hs :=
    lazymatch pat with
91
    | [] => eval cbv in Hs
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
    | SelPure :: ?pat => go pat Δ (ESelPure :: Hs)
    | SelPersistent :: ?pat =>
       let Hs' := eval env_cbv in (env_dom (env_persistent Δ)) in
       let Δ' := eval env_cbv in (envs_clear_persistent Δ) in
       go pat Δ' ((ESelName true <$> Hs') ++ Hs)
    | SelSpatial :: ?pat =>
       let Hs' := eval env_cbv in (env_dom (env_spatial Δ)) in
       let Δ' := eval env_cbv in (envs_clear_spatial Δ) in
       go pat Δ' ((ESelName false <$> Hs') ++ Hs)
    | SelName ?H :: ?pat =>
       lazymatch eval env_cbv in (envs_lookup_delete H Δ) with
       | Some (?p,_,?Δ') => go pat Δ' (ESelName p H :: Hs)
       | None => fail "iElaborateSelPat:" H "not found"
       end
    end in
  lazymatch goal with
108
  | |- envs_entails ?Δ _ =>
109
110
111
    let pat := sel_pat.parse pat in go pat Δ (@nil esel_pat)
  end.

112
113
114
115
Local Ltac iClearHyp H :=
  eapply tac_clear with _ H _ _; (* (i:=H) *)
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iClear:" H "not found"|].

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
116
117
Tactic Notation "iClear" constr(Hs) :=
  let rec go Hs :=
118
    lazymatch Hs with
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
119
    | [] => idtac
120
    | ESelPure :: ?Hs => clear; go Hs
121
    | ESelName _ ?H :: ?Hs => iClearHyp H; go Hs
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
122
    end in
123
  let Hs := iElaborateSelPat Hs in go Hs.
124

125
126
Tactic Notation "iClear" "(" ident_list(xs) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iClear Hs; clear xs.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
127
128
129

(** * Assumptions *)
Tactic Notation "iExact" constr(H) :=
130
  eapply tac_assumption with H _ _; (* (i:=H) *)
131
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iExact:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
132
133
134
    |apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- FromAssumption _ ?P _ => P end in
     fail "iExact:" H ":" P "does not match goal"].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142

Tactic Notation "iAssumptionCore" :=
  let rec find Γ i P :=
    match Γ with
    | Esnoc ?Γ ?j ?Q => first [unify P Q; unify i j| find Γ i P]
    end in
  match goal with
  | |- envs_lookup ?i (Envs ?Γp ?Γs) = Some (_, ?P) =>
143
     first [is_evar i; fail 1 | env_reflexivity]
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
144
  | |- envs_lookup ?i (Envs ?Γp ?Γs) = Some (_, ?P) =>
145
     is_evar i; first [find Γp i P | find Γs i P]; env_reflexivity
146
  | |- envs_lookup_delete ?i (Envs ?Γp ?Γs) = Some (_, ?P, _) =>
147
     first [is_evar i; fail 1 | env_reflexivity]
148
  | |- envs_lookup_delete ?i (Envs ?Γp ?Γs) = Some (_, ?P, _) =>
149
     is_evar i; first [find Γp i P | find Γs i P]; env_reflexivity
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
150
  end.
151

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
152
Tactic Notation "iAssumption" :=
153
154
155
156
  let Hass := fresh in
  let rec find p Γ Q :=
    match Γ with
    | Esnoc ?Γ ?j ?P => first
157
       [pose proof (_ : FromAssumption p P Q) as Hass;
158
        apply (tac_assumption _ j p P); [env_reflexivity|apply Hass]
159
160
161
       |find p Γ Q]
    end in
  match goal with
162
  | |- envs_entails (Envs ?Γp ?Γs) ?Q =>
163
164
165
     first [find true Γp Q | find false Γs Q
           |fail "iAssumption:" Q "not found"]
  end.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
166
167
168
169
170

(** * False *)
Tactic Notation "iExFalso" := apply tac_ex_falso.

(** * Making hypotheses persistent or pure *)
171
Local Tactic Notation "iPersistent" constr(H) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
172
  eapply tac_persistent with _ H _ _ _; (* (i:=H) *)
173
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iPersistent:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
174
    |apply _ ||
175
     let Q := match goal with |- IntoPersistent _ ?Q _ => Q end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
176
     fail "iPersistent:" Q "not persistent"
177
    |env_reflexivity|].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
178

179
Local Tactic Notation "iPure" constr(H) "as" simple_intropattern(pat) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
180
  eapply tac_pure with _ H _ _ _; (* (i:=H1) *)
181
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iPure:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
182
183
184
    |apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- IntoPure ?P _ => P end in
     fail "iPure:" P "not pure"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
185
186
    |intros pat].

187
Tactic Notation "iPureIntro" :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
188
  iStartProof;
189
  eapply tac_pure_intro;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
190
191
192
193
    [apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- FromPure ?P _ => P end in
     fail "iPureIntro:" P "not pure"
    |].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
194

195
196
197
198
(** Framing *)
Local Ltac iFrameFinish :=
  lazy iota beta;
  try match goal with
199
  | |- envs_entails _ True => exact (uPred.pure_intro _ _ I)
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
  end.

Local Ltac iFramePure t :=
  let φ := type of t in
  eapply (tac_frame_pure _ _ _ _ t);
    [apply _ || fail "iFrame: cannot frame" φ
    |iFrameFinish].

Local Ltac iFrameHyp H :=
  eapply tac_frame with _ H _ _ _;
210
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iFrame:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
211
212
213
    |apply _ ||
     let R := match goal with |- Frame _ ?R _ _ => R end in
     fail "iFrame: cannot frame" R
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
    |iFrameFinish].

Local Ltac iFrameAnyPure :=
  repeat match goal with H : _ |- _ => iFramePure H end.

Local Ltac iFrameAnyPersistent :=
  let rec go Hs :=
    match Hs with [] => idtac | ?H :: ?Hs => repeat iFrameHyp H; go Hs end in
  match goal with
223
  | |- envs_entails ?Δ _ =>
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
     let Hs := eval cbv in (env_dom (env_persistent Δ)) in go Hs
  end.

Local Ltac iFrameAnySpatial :=
  let rec go Hs :=
    match Hs with [] => idtac | ?H :: ?Hs => try iFrameHyp H; go Hs end in
  match goal with
231
  | |- envs_entails ?Δ _ =>
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
     let Hs := eval cbv in (env_dom (env_spatial Δ)) in go Hs
  end.

Tactic Notation "iFrame" := iFrameAnySpatial.

Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 ).
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 ).
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 ).
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 ).
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) constr(t6) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 ).
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) constr(t6) constr(t7) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 t7 ).
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) constr(t6) constr(t7) constr(t8)")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 t7 t8 ).

Tactic Notation "iFrame" constr(Hs) :=
  let rec go Hs :=
260
    lazymatch Hs with
261
    | [] => idtac
262
263
264
265
    | SelPure :: ?Hs => iFrameAnyPure; go Hs
    | SelPersistent :: ?Hs => iFrameAnyPersistent; go Hs
    | SelSpatial :: ?Hs => iFrameAnySpatial; go Hs
    | SelName ?H :: ?Hs => iFrameHyp H; go Hs
266
    end
267
  in let Hs := sel_pat.parse Hs in go Hs.
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 ) Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 ) Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4) ")"
    constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 ) Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 ) Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) constr(t6) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 ) Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) constr(t6) constr(t7) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 t7 ) Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) constr(t6) constr(t7) constr(t8)")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 t7 t8 ) Hs.

290
291
292
(** * Basic introduction tactics *)
Local Tactic Notation "iIntro" "(" simple_intropattern(x) ")" :=
  try iStartProof;
293
  lazymatch goal with
294
  | |- envs_entails _ _ =>
295
    eapply tac_forall_intro;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
296
      [apply _ ||
297
298
299
300
301
       let P := match goal with |- FromForall ?P _ => P end in
       fail "iIntro: cannot turn" P "into a universal quantifier"
      |lazy beta; intros x]
  | |- _ => intros x
  end.
302
303
304
305
306
307

Local Tactic Notation "iIntro" constr(H) :=
  iStartProof;
  first
  [ (* (?Q → _) *)
    eapply tac_impl_intro with _ H; (* (i:=H) *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
308
      [env_cbv; apply _ ||
309
       let P := lazymatch goal with |- Persistent ?P => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
310
311
       fail 1 "iIntro: introducing non-persistent" H ":" P
              "into non-empty spatial context"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
312
313
      |env_reflexivity || fail "iIntro:" H "not fresh"
      |]
314
315
  | (* (_ -∗ _) *)
    eapply tac_wand_intro with _ H; (* (i:=H) *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
316
317
      [env_reflexivity || fail 1 "iIntro:" H "not fresh"
      |]
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
  | fail 1 "iIntro: nothing to introduce" ].

Local Tactic Notation "iIntro" "#" constr(H) :=
  iStartProof;
  first
  [ (* (?P → _) *)
    eapply tac_impl_intro_persistent with _ H _; (* (i:=H) *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
325
      [apply _ || 
326
       let P := match goal with |- IntoPersistent _ ?P _ => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
327
328
329
       fail 1 "iIntro: " P " not persistent"
      |env_reflexivity || fail 1 "iIntro:" H "not fresh"
      |]
330
331
  | (* (?P -∗ _) *)
    eapply tac_wand_intro_persistent with _ H _; (* (i:=H) *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
332
      [apply _ || 
333
       let P := match goal with |- IntoPersistent _ ?P _ => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
334
335
336
       fail 1 "iIntro: " P " not persistent"
      |env_reflexivity || fail 1 "iIntro:" H "not fresh"
      |]
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
  | fail 1 "iIntro: nothing to introduce" ].

Local Tactic Notation "iIntro" "_" :=
  try iStartProof;
  first
  [ (* (?Q → _) *) apply tac_impl_intro_drop
  | (* (_ -∗ _) *) apply tac_wand_intro_drop
  | (* (∀ _, _) *) iIntro (_)
  | fail 1 "iIntro: nothing to introduce" ].

Local Tactic Notation "iIntroForall" :=
  try iStartProof;
  lazymatch goal with
  | |-  _, ?P => fail
  | |-  _, _ => intro
352
  | |- envs_entails _ ( x : _, _) => let x' := fresh x in iIntro (x')
353
354
355
356
357
  end.
Local Tactic Notation "iIntro" :=
  try iStartProof;
  lazymatch goal with
  | |- _  ?P => intro
358
359
  | |- envs_entails _ (_ - _) => iIntro (?) || let H := iFresh in iIntro #H || iIntro H
  | |- envs_entails _ (_  _) => iIntro (?) || let H := iFresh in iIntro #H || iIntro H
360
361
  end.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
362
(** * Specialize *)
363
364
365
366
367
Record iTrm {X As} :=
  ITrm { itrm : X ; itrm_vars : hlist As ; itrm_hyps : string }.
Arguments ITrm {_ _} _ _ _.

Notation "( H $! x1 .. xn )" :=
368
  (ITrm H (hcons x1 .. (hcons xn hnil) ..) "") (at level 0, x1, xn at level 9).
369
Notation "( H $! x1 .. xn 'with' pat )" :=
370
  (ITrm H (hcons x1 .. (hcons xn hnil) ..) pat) (at level 0, x1, xn at level 9).
371
372
Notation "( H 'with' pat )" := (ITrm H hnil pat) (at level 0).

373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
(*
There is some hacky stuff going on here (most probably there is a Coq bug).
Holes -- like unresolved type class instances -- in the argument `xs` are
resolved at arbitrary moments. It seems that tactics like `apply`, `split` and
`eexists` trigger type class search to resolve these holes. To avoid TC being
triggered too eagerly, this tactic uses `refine` at various places instead of
`apply`.

TODO: Investigate what really is going on. Is there a related to Cog bug #5752?
When should holes in an `open_constr` be resolved?
*)
384
Local Tactic Notation "iSpecializeArgs" constr(H) open_constr(xs) :=
385
  let rec go xs :=
386
    lazymatch xs with
387
    | hnil => apply id (* Finally, trigger TC *)
388
    | hcons ?x ?xs =>
389
       eapply tac_forall_specialize with _ H _ _ _; (* (i:=H) (a:=x) *)
390
391
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H "not found"
         |typeclasses eauto ||
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
392
          let P := match goal with |- IntoForall ?P _ => P end in
393
394
395
396
          fail "iSpecialize: cannot instantiate" P "with" x
         |lazymatch goal with (* Force [A] in [ex_intro] to deal with coercions. *)
          | |-  _ : ?A, _ => refine (@ex_intro A _ x (conj _ _))
          end; [env_reflexivity|go xs]]
397
398
    end in
  go xs.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
399

400
Local Tactic Notation "iSpecializePat" open_constr(H) constr(pat) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
401
  let solve_to_wand H1 :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
402
    apply _ ||
403
    let P := match goal with |- IntoWand _ ?P _ _ => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
404
    fail "iSpecialize:" P "not an implication/wand" in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
405
406
407
  let rec go H1 pats :=
    lazymatch pats with
    | [] => idtac
408
409
410
    | SForall :: ?pats =>
       idtac "the * specialization pattern is deprecated because it is applied implicitly";
       go H1 pats
411
    | SName ?H2 :: ?pats =>
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
412
       eapply tac_specialize with _ _ H2 _ H1 _ _ _ _; (* (j:=H1) (i:=H2) *)
413
414
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H2 "not found"
         |env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H1 "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
415
         |apply _ ||
416
417
          let P := match goal with |- IntoWand _ ?P ?Q _ => P end in
          let Q := match goal with |- IntoWand _ ?P ?Q _ => Q end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
418
          fail "iSpecialize: cannot instantiate" P "with" Q
419
         |env_reflexivity|go H1 pats]
420
421
    | SPureGoal ?d :: ?pats =>
       eapply tac_specialize_assert_pure with _ H1 _ _ _ _ _;
422
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H1 "not found"
423
         |solve_to_wand H1
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
424
425
426
         |apply _ ||
          let Q := match goal with |- FromPure ?Q _ => Q end in
          fail "iSpecialize:" Q "not pure"
427
         |env_reflexivity
428
         |done_if d (*goal*)
429
         |go H1 pats]
430
431
    | SGoal (SpecGoal GPersistent false ?Hs_frame [] ?d) :: ?pats =>
       eapply tac_specialize_assert_persistent with _ _ H1 _ _ _ _;
432
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H1 "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
433
         |solve_to_wand H1
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
434
         |apply _ ||
435
          let Q := match goal with |- Persistent ?Q => Q end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
436
          fail "iSpecialize:" Q "not persistent"
437
         |env_reflexivity
438
         |iFrame Hs_frame; done_if d (*goal*)
439
         |go H1 pats]
440
441
442
    | SGoal (SpecGoal GPersistent _ _ _ _) :: ?pats =>
       fail "iSpecialize: cannot select hypotheses for persistent premise"
    | SGoal (SpecGoal ?m ?lr ?Hs_frame ?Hs ?d) :: ?pats =>
443
       let Hs' := eval cbv in (if lr then Hs else Hs_frame ++ Hs) in
444
       eapply tac_specialize_assert with _ _ _ H1 _ lr Hs' _ _ _ _;
445
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H1 "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
446
         |solve_to_wand H1
447
448
449
         |lazymatch m with
          | GSpatial => apply elim_modal_dummy
          | GModal => apply _ || fail "iSpecialize: goal not a modality"
450
          end
451
452
         |env_reflexivity ||
          let Hs' := iMissingHyps Hs' in
453
          fail "iSpecialize: hypotheses" Hs' "not found"
454
         |iFrame Hs_frame; done_if d (*goal*)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
455
         |go H1 pats]
456
457
    | SAutoFrame GPersistent :: ?pats =>
       eapply tac_specialize_assert_persistent with _ _ H1 _ _ _ _;
458
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H1 "not found"
459
         |solve_to_wand H1
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
460
         |apply _ ||
461
          let Q := match goal with |- Persistent ?Q => Q end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
462
          fail "iSpecialize:" Q "not persistent"
463
         |env_reflexivity
464
465
466
467
         |solve [iFrame "∗ #"]
         |go H1 pats]
    | SAutoFrame ?m :: ?pats =>
       eapply tac_specialize_frame with _ H1 _ _ _ _ _ _;
468
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H1 "not found"
469
470
471
472
473
         |solve_to_wand H1
         |lazymatch m with
          | GSpatial => apply elim_modal_dummy
          | GModal => apply _ || fail "iSpecialize: goal not a modality"
          end
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
474
475
         |iFrame "∗ #"; apply tac_unlock ||
          fail "iSpecialize: premise cannot be solved by framing"
476
         |reflexivity]; iIntro H1; go H1 pats
477
478
    end in let pats := spec_pat.parse pat in go H pats.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
479
(* The argument [p] denotes whether the conclusion of the specialized term is
480
481
482
persistent. If so, one can use all spatial hypotheses for both proving the
premises and the remaning goal. The argument [p] can either be a Boolean or an
introduction pattern, which will be coerced into [true] when it solely contains
483
484
485
486
487
`#` or `%` patterns at the top-level.

In case the specialization pattern in [t] states that the modality of the goal
should be kept for one of the premises (i.e. [>[H1 .. Hn]] is used) then [p]
defaults to [false] (i.e. spatial hypotheses are not preserved). *)
488
Tactic Notation "iSpecializeCore" open_constr(t) "as" constr(p) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
489
  let p := intro_pat_persistent p in
490
491
  let t :=
    match type of t with string => constr:(ITrm t hnil "") | _ => t end in
492
493
  lazymatch t with
  | ITrm ?H ?xs ?pat =>
494
    let pat := spec_pat.parse pat in
495
496
    lazymatch type of H with
    | string =>
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
      (* The lemma [tac_specialize_persistent_helper] allows one to use all
      spatial hypotheses for both proving the premises of the lemma we
      specialize as well as those of the remaining goal. We can only use it when
      the result of the specialization is persistent, and no modality is
      eliminated. As an optimization, we do not use this when only universal
      quantifiers are instantiated. *)
      lazymatch eval compute in
        (bool_decide (pat  []) && p && negb (existsb spec_pat_modal pat)) with
505
506
      | true =>
         eapply tac_specialize_persistent_helper with _ H _ _ _;
507
           [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H "not found"
508
           |iSpecializeArgs H xs; iSpecializePat H pat; last (iExact H)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
509
           |apply _ ||
510
            let Q := match goal with |- Persistent ?Q => Q end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
511
            fail "iSpecialize:" Q "not persistent"
512
           |env_reflexivity|(* goal *)]
513
      | false => iSpecializeArgs H xs; iSpecializePat H pat
514
515
      end
    | _ => fail "iSpecialize:" H "should be a hypothesis, use iPoseProof instead"
516
    end
517
  | _ => fail "iSpecialize:" t "should be a proof mode term"
518
  end.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
519

520
Tactic Notation "iSpecialize" open_constr(t) :=
521
522
523
  iSpecializeCore t as false.
Tactic Notation "iSpecialize" open_constr(t) "as" "#" :=
  iSpecializeCore t as true.
524

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
525
(** * Pose proof *)
526
527
(* The tactic [iIntoValid] tactic solves a goal [uPred_valid Q]. The
arguments [t] is a Coq term whose type is of the following shape:
528

529
- [∀ (x_1 : A_1) .. (x_n : A_n), uPred_valid Q]
530
- [∀ (x_1 : A_1) .. (x_n : A_n), P1 ⊢ P2], in which case [Q] becomes [P1 -∗ P2]
531
532
533
534
- [∀ (x_1 : A_1) .. (x_n : A_n), P1 ⊣⊢ P2], in which case [Q] becomes [P1 ↔ P2]

The tactic instantiates each dependent argument [x_i] with an evar and generates
a goal [P] for non-dependent arguments [x_i : P]. *)
535
Tactic Notation "iIntoValid" open_constr(t) :=
536
  let rec go t :=
537
    let tT := type of t in
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
    lazymatch eval hnf in tT with
    | ?P  ?Q => let H := fresh in assert P as H; [|go uconstr:(t H); clear H]
    |  _ : ?T, _ =>
      (* Put [T] inside an [id] to avoid TC inference from being invoked. *)
      (* This is a workarround for Coq bug #4969. *)
      let e := fresh in evar (e:id T);
      let e' := eval unfold e in e in clear e; go (t e')
    | _ =>
546
547
      let tT' := eval cbv zeta in tT in apply (as_valid_1 tT');
        [apply _ || fail "iPoseProof: not a uPred"|exact t]
548
    end in
549
  go t.
550

551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
(* The tactic [tac] is called with a temporary fresh name [H]. The argument
[lazy_tc] denotes whether type class inference on the premises of [lem] should
be performed before (if false) or after (if true) [tac H] is called. *)
Tactic Notation "iPoseProofCore" open_constr(lem)
    "as" constr(p) constr(lazy_tc) tactic(tac) :=
  try iStartProof;
  let Htmp := iFresh in
  let t :=
    lazymatch lem with ITrm ?t ?xs ?pat => t | _ => lem end in
  let spec_tac _ :=
    lazymatch lem with
    | ITrm ?t ?xs ?pat => iSpecializeCore (ITrm Htmp xs pat) as p
    | _ => idtac
    end in
  let go goal_tac :=
566
567
568
    lazymatch type of t with
    | string =>
       eapply tac_pose_proof_hyp with _ _ t _ Htmp _;
569
570
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iPoseProof:" t "not found"
         |env_reflexivity || fail "iPoseProof:" Htmp "not fresh"
571
         |goal_tac ()]
572
573
    | _ =>
       eapply tac_pose_proof with _ Htmp _; (* (j:=H) *)
574
         [iIntoValid t
575
         |env_reflexivity || fail "iPoseProof:" Htmp "not fresh"
576
         |goal_tac ()]
577
    end;
578
579
580
581
    try (apply _) in
  lazymatch eval compute in lazy_tc with
  | true => go ltac:(fun _ => spec_tac (); last (tac Htmp))
  | false => go spec_tac; last (tac Htmp)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
582
583
584
  end.

(** * Apply *)
585
Tactic Notation "iApplyHyp" constr(H) :=
586
587
  let rec go H := first
    [eapply tac_apply with _ H _ _ _;
588
      [env_reflexivity
589
590
      |apply _
      |lazy beta (* reduce betas created by instantiation *)]
591
    |iSpecializePat H "[]"; last go H] in
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
  iExact H ||
  go H ||
  lazymatch iTypeOf H with
  | Some (_,?Q) => fail "iApply: cannot apply" Q
  end.

Tactic Notation "iApply" open_constr(lem) :=
  iPoseProofCore lem as false true (fun H => iApplyHyp H).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
600
601

(** * Revert *)
602
Local Tactic Notation "iForallRevert" ident(x) :=
603
604
605
606
607
608
  let err x :=
    intros x;
    iMatchHyp (fun H P =>
      lazymatch P with
      | context [x] => fail 2 "iRevert:" x "is used in hypothesis" H
      end) in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
609
  iStartProof;
610
611
  let A := type of x in
  lazymatch type of A with
612
613
614
  | Prop => revert x; first [apply tac_pure_revert|err x]
  | _ => revert x; first [apply tac_forall_revert|err x]
  end.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
615
616

Tactic Notation "iRevert" constr(Hs) :=
617
618
  let rec go Hs :=
    lazymatch Hs with
619
    | [] => idtac
620
621
622
623
624
    | ESelPure :: ?Hs =>
       repeat match goal with x : _ |- _ => revert x end;
       go Hs
    | ESelName _ ?H :: ?Hs =>
       eapply tac_revert with _ H _ _; (* (i:=H2) *)
625
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iRevert:" H "not found"
626
         |env_cbv; go Hs]
627
    end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
628
  let Hs := iElaborateSelPat Hs in iStartProof; go Hs.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
629

630
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ")" :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
631
  iForallRevert x1.
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x2; iRevert ( x1 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x3; iRevert ( x1 x2 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x4; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x5; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ident(x6) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x6; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ident(x6) ident(x7) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x7; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ident(x6) ident(x7) ident(x8) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x8; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 ).

Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4) ")"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
658
    constr(Hs) :=
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ident(x6) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ident(x6) ident(x7) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ident(x6) ident(x7) ident(x8) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 x8 ).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
672
673
674

(** * Disjunction *)
Tactic Notation "iLeft" :=
675
  iStartProof;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
676
  eapply tac_or_l;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
677
678
679
680
    [apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- FromOr ?P _ _ => P end in
     fail "iLeft:" P "not a disjunction"
    |].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
681
Tactic Notation "iRight" :=
682
  iStartProof;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
683
  eapply tac_or_r;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
684
685
686
687
    [apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- FromOr ?P _ _ => P end in
     fail "iRight:" P "not a disjunction"
    |].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
688

689
Local Tactic Notation "iOrDestruct" constr(H) "as" constr(H1) constr(H2) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
690
  eapply tac_or_destruct with _ _ H _ H1 H2 _ _ _; (* (i:=H) (j1:=H1) (j2:=H2) *)
691
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iOrDestruct:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
692
693
694
    |apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- IntoOr ?P _ _ => P end in
     fail "iOrDestruct: cannot destruct" P
695
    |env_reflexivity || fail "iOrDestruct:" H1 "not fresh"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
696
697
    |env_reflexivity || fail "iOrDestruct:" H2 "not fresh"
    | |].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
698
699
700

(** * Conjunction and separating conjunction *)
Tactic Notation "iSplit" :=
701
  iStartProof;
702
703
704
705
  eapply tac_and_split;
    [apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- FromAnd _ ?P _ _ => P end in
     fail "iSplit:" P "not a conjunction"| |].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
706
707

Tactic Notation "iSplitL" constr(Hs) :=
708
  iStartProof;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
709
  let Hs := words Hs in
710
  eapply tac_sep_split with _ _ Left Hs _ _; (* (js:=Hs) *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
711
    [apply _ ||
712
     let P := match goal with |- FromAnd _ ?P _ _ => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
713
     fail "iSplitL:" P "not a separating conjunction"
714
715
    |env_reflexivity ||
     let Hs := iMissingHyps Hs in
716
     fail "iSplitL: hypotheses" Hs "not found"
717
718
    | |].

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
719
Tactic Notation "iSplitR" constr(Hs) :=
720
  iStartProof;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
721
  let Hs := words Hs in
722
  eapply tac_sep_split with _ _ Right Hs _ _; (* (js:=Hs) *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
723
    [apply _ ||
724
     let P := match goal with |- FromAnd _ ?P _ _ => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
725
     fail "iSplitR:" P "not a separating conjunction"
726
727
    |env_reflexivity ||
     let Hs := iMissingHyps Hs in
728
     fail "iSplitR: hypotheses" Hs "not found"
729
    | |].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
730
731
732
733

Tactic Notation "iSplitL" := iSplitR "".
Tactic Notation "iSplitR" := iSplitL "".

734
735
Local Tactic Notation "iAndDestruct" constr(H) "as" constr(H1) constr(H2) :=
  eapply tac_and_destruct with _ H _ H1 H2 _ _ _; (* (i:=H) (j1:=H1) (j2:=H2) *)
736
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iAndDestruct:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
737
738
739
    |apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- IntoAnd _ ?P _ _ => P end in
     fail "iAndDestruct: cannot destruct" P
740
    |env_reflexivity || fail "iAndDestruct:" H1 "or" H2 " not fresh"|].
741

742
743
Local Tactic Notation "iAndDestructChoice" constr(H) "as" constr(d) constr(H') :=
  eapply tac_and_destruct_choice with _ H _ d H' _ _ _;
744
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iAndDestructChoice:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
745
746
747
    |apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- IntoAnd _ ?P _ _ => P end in
     fail "iAndDestructChoice: cannot destruct" P
748
    |env_reflexivity || fail "iAndDestructChoice:" H' " not fresh"|].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
749

750
751
752
753
(** * Combinining hypotheses *)
Tactic Notation "iCombine" constr(Hs) "as" constr(H) :=
  let Hs := words Hs in
  eapply tac_combine with _ _ Hs _ _ H _;
754
755
    [env_reflexivity ||
     let Hs := iMissingHyps Hs in
756
     fail "iCombine: hypotheses" Hs "not found"
757
    |apply _
758
    |env_reflexivity || fail "iCombine:" H "not fresh"|].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
759

760
761
762
Tactic Notation "iCombine" constr(H1) constr(H2) "as" constr(H) :=
  iCombine [H1;H2] as H.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
763
(** * Existential *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
764
Tactic Notation "iExists" uconstr(x1) :=
765
  iStartProof;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
766
  eapply tac_exist;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
767
768
769
    [apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- FromExist ?P _ => P end in
     fail "iExists:" P "not an existential"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
770
    |cbv beta; eexists x1].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
771

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
772
Tactic Notation "iExists" uconstr(x1) "," uconstr(x2) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
773
  iExists x1; iExists x2.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
774
Tactic Notation "iExists" uconstr(x1) "," uconstr(x2) "," uconstr(x3) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
775
  iExists x1; iExists x2, x3.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
776
777
Tactic Notation "iExists" uconstr(x1) "," uconstr(x2) "," uconstr(x3) ","
    uconstr(x4) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
778
  iExists x1; iExists x2, x3, x4.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
779
780
Tactic Notation "iExists" uconstr(x1) "," uconstr(x2) "," uconstr(x3) ","
    uconstr(x4) "," uconstr(x5) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
781
  iExists x1; iExists x2, x3, x4, x5.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
782
783
Tactic Notation "iExists" uconstr(x1) "," uconstr(x2) "," uconstr(x3) ","
    uconstr(x4) "," uconstr(x5) "," uconstr(x6) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
784
  iExists x1; iExists x2, x3, x4, x5, x6.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
785
786
Tactic Notation "iExists" uconstr(x1) "," uconstr(x2) "," uconstr(x3) ","
    uconstr(x4) "," uconstr(x5) "," uconstr(x6) "," uconstr(x7) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
787
  iExists x1; iExists x2, x3, x4, x5, x6, x7.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
788
789
790
Tactic Notation "iExists" uconstr(x1) "," uconstr(x2) "," uconstr(x3) ","
    uconstr(x4) "," uconstr(x5) "," uconstr(x6) "," uconstr(x7) ","
    uconstr(x8) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
791
792
  iExists x1; iExists x2, x3, x4, x5, x6, x7, x8.

793
794
Local Tactic Notation "iExistDestruct" constr(H)
    "as" simple_intropattern(x) constr(Hx) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
795
  eapply tac_exist_destruct with H _ Hx _ _; (* (i:=H) (j:=Hx) *)
796
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iExistDestruct:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
797
798
799
    |apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- IntoExist ?P _ => P end in
     fail "iExistDestruct: cannot destruct" P|];
800
801
  let y := fresh in
  intros y; eexists; split;
802
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iExistDestruct:" Hx "not fresh"
803
    |revert y; intros x].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
804

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
805
806
(** * Always *)