tactics.v 79.2 KB
Newer Older
1 2
From iris.proofmode Require Import coq_tactics.
From iris.proofmode Require Import intro_patterns spec_patterns sel_patterns.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
3
From iris.bi Require Export bi.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
4
From iris.proofmode Require Export classes notation.
5
From iris.proofmode Require Import class_instances.
Ralf Jung's avatar
Ralf Jung committed
6
From stdpp Require Import stringmap hlist.
7
From iris.proofmode Require Import strings.
8
Set Default Proof Using "Type".
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
9 10

Declare Reduction env_cbv := cbv [
11
  beq ascii_beq string_beq
12 13
  env_lookup env_lookup_delete env_delete env_app env_replace env_dom
  env_persistent env_spatial env_spatial_is_nil envs_dom
14
  envs_lookup envs_lookup_delete envs_delete envs_snoc envs_app
15 16
    envs_simple_replace envs_replace envs_split
    envs_clear_spatial envs_clear_persistent
17
    envs_split_go envs_split].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
18 19
Ltac env_cbv :=
  match goal with |- ?u => let v := eval env_cbv in u in change v end.
20
Ltac env_reflexivity := env_cbv; exact eq_refl.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
21

22
(** * Misc *)
23 24
(* Tactic Notation tactics cannot return terms *)
Ltac iFresh' H :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
25 26
  lazymatch goal with
  |- of_envs ?Δ  _ =>
27 28 29
     (* [vm_compute fails] if any of the hypotheses in [Δ] contain evars, so
     first use [cbv] to compute the domain of [Δ] *)
     let Hs := eval cbv in (envs_dom Δ) in
30 31
     eval vm_compute in (fresh_string_of_set H (of_list Hs))
  | _ => H
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
32
  end.
33
Ltac iFresh := iFresh' "~".
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
34

35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43
Ltac iMissingHyps Hs :=
  let Δ :=
    lazymatch goal with
    | |- of_envs ?Δ  _ => Δ
    | |- context[ envs_split _ _ ?Δ ] => Δ
    end in
  let Hhyps := eval env_cbv in (envs_dom Δ) in
  eval vm_compute in (list_difference Hs Hhyps).

44
Ltac iTypeOf H :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
45
  let Δ := match goal with |- of_envs ?Δ  _ => Δ end in
46
  eval env_cbv in (envs_lookup H Δ).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
47

48
Tactic Notation "iMatchHyp" tactic1(tac) :=
49 50 51 52
  match goal with
  | |- context[ environments.Esnoc _ ?x ?P ] => tac x P
  end.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
53
Class AsValid {PROP : bi} (φ : Prop) (P : PROP) := as_entails : φ  P.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
54 55
Arguments AsValid {_} _%type _%I.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
56
Instance as_valid_valid {PROP : bi} (P : PROP) : AsValid (bi_valid P) P | 0.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
57 58
Proof. by rewrite /AsValid. Qed.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
59 60
Instance as_valid_entails {PROP : bi} (P Q : PROP) : AsValid (P  Q) (P - Q) | 1.
Proof. split. apply bi.entails_wand. apply bi.wand_entails. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
61

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
62 63
Instance as_valid_equiv {PROP : bi} (P Q : PROP) : AsValid (P  Q) (P - Q).
Proof. split. apply bi.equiv_wand_iff. apply bi.wand_iff_equiv. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
64

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
65
(** * Start a proof *)
66
Ltac iStartProof :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
67
  lazymatch goal with
68
  | |- of_envs _  _ => idtac
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
69
  | |- let _ := _ in _ => fail
70
  | |- ?P =>
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
71
    apply (proj2 (_ : AsValid P _)), tac_adequate
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
72
    || fail "iStartProof: not a BI entailment"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
73 74 75 76 77
  end.

(** * Context manipulation *)
Tactic Notation "iRename" constr(H1) "into" constr(H2) :=
  eapply tac_rename with _ H1 H2 _ _; (* (i:=H1) (j:=H2) *)
78 79
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iRename:" H1 "not found"
    |env_reflexivity || fail "iRename:" H2 "not fresh"|].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
80

81 82 83 84
Local Inductive esel_pat :=
  | ESelPure
  | ESelName : bool  string  esel_pat.

85
Ltac iElaborateSelPat pat :=
86 87
  let rec go pat Δ Hs :=
    lazymatch pat with
88
    | [] => eval cbv in Hs
89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108
    | SelPure :: ?pat => go pat Δ (ESelPure :: Hs)
    | SelPersistent :: ?pat =>
       let Hs' := eval env_cbv in (env_dom (env_persistent Δ)) in
       let Δ' := eval env_cbv in (envs_clear_persistent Δ) in
       go pat Δ' ((ESelName true <$> Hs') ++ Hs)
    | SelSpatial :: ?pat =>
       let Hs' := eval env_cbv in (env_dom (env_spatial Δ)) in
       let Δ' := eval env_cbv in (envs_clear_spatial Δ) in
       go pat Δ' ((ESelName false <$> Hs') ++ Hs)
    | SelName ?H :: ?pat =>
       lazymatch eval env_cbv in (envs_lookup_delete H Δ) with
       | Some (?p,_,?Δ') => go pat Δ' (ESelName p H :: Hs)
       | None => fail "iElaborateSelPat:" H "not found"
       end
    end in
  lazymatch goal with
  | |- of_envs ?Δ  _ =>
    let pat := sel_pat.parse pat in go pat Δ (@nil esel_pat)
  end.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
109 110
Tactic Notation "iClear" constr(Hs) :=
  let rec go Hs :=
111
    lazymatch Hs with
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
112
    | [] => idtac
113 114
    | ESelPure :: ?Hs => clear; go Hs
    | ESelName _ ?H :: ?Hs =>
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
115
       eapply tac_clear with _ H _ _; (* (i:=H) *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
116 117 118 119 120
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iClear:" H "not found"
         |env_cbv; apply _ ||
          let P := match goal with |- TCOr (Affine ?P) _ => P end in
          fail "iClear:" H ":" P "not affine and the goal not absorbing"
         |go Hs]
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
121
    end in
122
  let Hs := iElaborateSelPat Hs in go Hs.
123

124 125
Tactic Notation "iClear" "(" ident_list(xs) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iClear Hs; clear xs.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
126 127 128

(** * Assumptions *)
Tactic Notation "iExact" constr(H) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
129
  eapply tac_assumption with _ H _ _; (* (i:=H) *)
130
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iExact:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
131 132
    |apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- FromAssumption _ ?P _ => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
133 134 135
     fail "iExact:" H ":" P "does not match goal"
    |env_cbv; apply _ ||
     fail "iExact:" H "not absorbing and the remaining hypotheses not affine"].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
136 137 138

Tactic Notation "iAssumptionCore" :=
  let rec find Γ i P :=
139
    lazymatch Γ with
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
140
    | Esnoc ?Γ ?j ?Q => first [unify P Q; unify i j|find Γ i P]
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
141 142 143
    end in
  match goal with
  | |- envs_lookup ?i (Envs ?Γp ?Γs) = Some (_, ?P) =>
144
     first [is_evar i; fail 1 | env_reflexivity]
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
145
  | |- envs_lookup ?i (Envs ?Γp ?Γs) = Some (_, ?P) =>
146
     is_evar i; first [find Γp i P | find Γs i P]; env_reflexivity
147
  | |- envs_lookup_delete ?i (Envs ?Γp ?Γs) = Some (_, ?P, _) =>
148
     first [is_evar i; fail 1 | env_reflexivity]
149
  | |- envs_lookup_delete ?i (Envs ?Γp ?Γs) = Some (_, ?P, _) =>
150
     is_evar i; first [find Γp i P | find Γs i P]; env_reflexivity
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
151
  end.
152

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
153
Tactic Notation "iAssumption" :=
154 155
  let Hass := fresh in
  let rec find p Γ Q :=
156
    lazymatch Γ with
157
    | Esnoc ?Γ ?j ?P => first
158
       [pose proof (_ : FromAssumption p P Q) as Hass;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167
        eapply (tac_assumption _ _ j p P);
          [env_reflexivity
          |apply Hass
          |env_cbv; apply _ ||
           fail 1 "iAssumption:" j "not absorbing and the remaining hypotheses not affine"]
       |assert (P = False%I) as Hass by reflexivity;
        apply (tac_false_destruct _ j p P);
          [env_reflexivity
          |exact Hass]
168 169
       |find p Γ Q]
    end in
170
  lazymatch goal with
171 172 173 174
  | |- of_envs (Envs ?Γp ?Γs)  ?Q =>
     first [find true Γp Q | find false Γs Q
           |fail "iAssumption:" Q "not found"]
  end.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
175 176 177 178 179

(** * False *)
Tactic Notation "iExFalso" := apply tac_ex_falso.

(** * Making hypotheses persistent or pure *)
180
Local Tactic Notation "iPersistent" constr(H) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
181
  eapply tac_persistent with _ H _ _ _; (* (i:=H) *)
182
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iPersistent:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
183
    |apply _ ||
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
184 185 186 187 188
     let P := match goal with |- IntoPersistent _ ?P _ => P end in
     fail "iPersistent:" P "not persistent"
    |env_cbv; apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- Affine ?P => P end in
     fail "iPersistent:" P "not affine"
189
    |env_reflexivity|].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
190

191
Local Tactic Notation "iPure" constr(H) "as" simple_intropattern(pat) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
192
  eapply tac_pure with _ H _ _ _; (* (i:=H1) *)
193
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iPure:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
194 195 196
    |apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- IntoPure ?P _ => P end in
     fail "iPure:" P "not pure"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
197 198 199
    |env_cbv; apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- Affine ?P => P end in
     fail "iPure:" P "not affine"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
200 201
    |intros pat].

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
202 203 204 205 206
Tactic Notation "iEmpIntro" :=
  iStartProof;
  eapply tac_emp_intro;
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iEmpIntro: spatial context is non-empty"].

207
Tactic Notation "iPureIntro" :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
208
  iStartProof;
209
  eapply tac_pure_intro;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
210 211 212 213
    [apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- FromPure ?P _ => P end in
     fail "iPureIntro:" P "not pure"
    |].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
214

215 216 217 218
(** Framing *)
Local Ltac iFrameFinish :=
  lazy iota beta;
  try match goal with
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
219 220
  | |- _  True => exact (bi.pure_intro _ _ I)
  | |- _  emp => iEmpIntro
221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230
  end.

Local Ltac iFramePure t :=
  let φ := type of t in
  eapply (tac_frame_pure _ _ _ _ t);
    [apply _ || fail "iFrame: cannot frame" φ
    |iFrameFinish].

Local Ltac iFrameHyp H :=
  eapply tac_frame with _ H _ _ _;
231
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iFrame:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
232 233 234
    |apply _ ||
     let R := match goal with |- Frame _ ?R _ _ => R end in
     fail "iFrame: cannot frame" R
235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280
    |iFrameFinish].

Local Ltac iFrameAnyPure :=
  repeat match goal with H : _ |- _ => iFramePure H end.

Local Ltac iFrameAnyPersistent :=
  let rec go Hs :=
    match Hs with [] => idtac | ?H :: ?Hs => repeat iFrameHyp H; go Hs end in
  match goal with
  | |- of_envs ?Δ  _ =>
     let Hs := eval cbv in (env_dom (env_persistent Δ)) in go Hs
  end.

Local Ltac iFrameAnySpatial :=
  let rec go Hs :=
    match Hs with [] => idtac | ?H :: ?Hs => try iFrameHyp H; go Hs end in
  match goal with
  | |- of_envs ?Δ  _ =>
     let Hs := eval cbv in (env_dom (env_spatial Δ)) in go Hs
  end.

Tactic Notation "iFrame" := iFrameAnySpatial.

Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 ).
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 ).
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 ).
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 ).
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) constr(t6) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 ).
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) constr(t6) constr(t7) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 t7 ).
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) constr(t6) constr(t7) constr(t8)")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 t7 t8 ).

Tactic Notation "iFrame" constr(Hs) :=
  let rec go Hs :=
281
    lazymatch Hs with
282
    | [] => idtac
283 284 285 286
    | SelPure :: ?Hs => iFrameAnyPure; go Hs
    | SelPersistent :: ?Hs => iFrameAnyPersistent; go Hs
    | SelSpatial :: ?Hs => iFrameAnySpatial; go Hs
    | SelName ?H :: ?Hs => iFrameHyp H; go Hs
287
    end
288
  in let Hs := sel_pat.parse Hs in go Hs.
289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 ) Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 ) Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4) ")"
    constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 ) Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 ) Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) constr(t6) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 ) Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) constr(t6) constr(t7) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 t7 ) Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) constr(t6) constr(t7) constr(t8)")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 t7 t8 ) Hs.

311 312 313
(** * Basic introduction tactics *)
Local Tactic Notation "iIntro" "(" simple_intropattern(x) ")" :=
  try iStartProof;
314 315 316
  lazymatch goal with
  | |- _  _ =>
    eapply tac_forall_intro;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
317
      [apply _ ||
318 319 320 321 322
       let P := match goal with |- FromForall ?P _ => P end in
       fail "iIntro: cannot turn" P "into a universal quantifier"
      |lazy beta; intros x]
  | |- _ => intros x
  end.
323 324 325 326 327 328

Local Tactic Notation "iIntro" constr(H) :=
  iStartProof;
  first
  [ (* (?Q → _) *)
    eapply tac_impl_intro with _ H; (* (i:=H) *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
329
      [env_cbv; apply _ ||
330
       let P := lazymatch goal with |- Persistent ?P => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
331 332
       fail 1 "iIntro: introducing non-persistent" H ":" P
              "into non-empty spatial context"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
333
      |env_reflexivity || fail 1 "iIntro:" H "not fresh"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
334
      |]
335 336
  | (* (_ -∗ _) *)
    eapply tac_wand_intro with _ H; (* (i:=H) *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
337 338
      [env_reflexivity || fail 1 "iIntro:" H "not fresh"
      |]
339 340 341 342 343 344 345
  | fail 1 "iIntro: nothing to introduce" ].

Local Tactic Notation "iIntro" "#" constr(H) :=
  iStartProof;
  first
  [ (* (?P → _) *)
    eapply tac_impl_intro_persistent with _ H _; (* (i:=H) *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
346
      [apply _ ||
347
       let P := match goal with |- IntoPersistent _ ?P _ => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
348
       fail 1 "iIntro:" P "not persistent"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
349 350
      |env_reflexivity || fail 1 "iIntro:" H "not fresh"
      |]
351 352
  | (* (?P -∗ _) *)
    eapply tac_wand_intro_persistent with _ H _; (* (i:=H) *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
353
      [apply _ ||
354
       let P := match goal with |- IntoPersistent _ ?P _ => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
355 356 357 358
       fail 1 "iIntro:" P "not persistent"
      |apply _ ||
       let P := match goal with |- Affine ?P => P end in
       fail 1 "iIntro:" P "not affine"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
359 360
      |env_reflexivity || fail 1 "iIntro:" H "not fresh"
      |]
361 362 363 364 365 366
  | fail 1 "iIntro: nothing to introduce" ].

Local Tactic Notation "iIntro" "_" :=
  try iStartProof;
  first
  [ (* (?Q → _) *) apply tac_impl_intro_drop
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
367 368 369 370 371 372
  | (* (_ -∗ _) *)
    apply tac_wand_intro_drop;
      [apply _ ||
       let P := match goal with |- TCOr (Affine ?P) _ => P end in
       fail 1 "iIntro:" P "not affine and the goal not absorbing"
      |]
373 374 375 376 377 378
  | (* (∀ _, _) *) iIntro (_)
  | fail 1 "iIntro: nothing to introduce" ].

Local Tactic Notation "iIntroForall" :=
  try iStartProof;
  lazymatch goal with
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
379
  | |-  _, ?P => fail (* actually an →, this is handled by iIntro below *)
380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390
  | |-  _, _ => intro
  | |- _  ( x : _, _) => let x' := fresh x in iIntro (x')
  end.
Local Tactic Notation "iIntro" :=
  try iStartProof;
  lazymatch goal with
  | |- _  ?P => intro
  | |- _  (_ - _) => iIntro (?) || let H := iFresh in iIntro #H || iIntro H
  | |- _  (_  _) => iIntro (?) || let H := iFresh in iIntro #H || iIntro H
  end.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
391
(** * Specialize *)
392 393 394 395 396
Record iTrm {X As} :=
  ITrm { itrm : X ; itrm_vars : hlist As ; itrm_hyps : string }.
Arguments ITrm {_ _} _ _ _.

Notation "( H $! x1 .. xn )" :=
397
  (ITrm H (hcons x1 .. (hcons xn hnil) ..) "") (at level 0, x1, xn at level 9).
398
Notation "( H $! x1 .. xn 'with' pat )" :=
399
  (ITrm H (hcons x1 .. (hcons xn hnil) ..) pat) (at level 0, x1, xn at level 9).
400 401
Notation "( H 'with' pat )" := (ITrm H hnil pat) (at level 0).

402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412
(*
There is some hacky stuff going on here (most probably there is a Coq bug).
Holes -- like unresolved type class instances -- in the argument `xs` are
resolved at arbitrary moments. It seems that tactics like `apply`, `split` and
`eexists` trigger type class search to resolve these holes. To avoid TC being
triggered too eagerly, this tactic uses `refine` at various places instead of
`apply`.

TODO: Investigate what really is going on. Is there a related to Cog bug #5752?
When should holes in an `open_constr` be resolved?
*)
413
Local Tactic Notation "iSpecializeArgs" constr(H) open_constr(xs) :=
414
  let rec go xs :=
415
    lazymatch xs with
416
    | hnil => apply id (* Finally, trigger TC *)
417
    | hcons ?x ?xs =>
418
       eapply tac_forall_specialize with _ H _ _ _; (* (i:=H) (a:=x) *)
419 420
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H "not found"
         |typeclasses eauto ||
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
421
          let P := match goal with |- IntoForall ?P _ => P end in
422 423 424 425
          fail "iSpecialize: cannot instantiate" P "with" x
         |lazymatch goal with (* Force [A] in [ex_intro] to deal with coercions. *)
          | |-  _ : ?A, _ => refine (@ex_intro A _ x (conj _ _))
          end; [env_reflexivity|go xs]]
426 427
    end in
  go xs.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
428

429
Local Tactic Notation "iSpecializePat" open_constr(H) constr(pat) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
430
  let solve_to_wand H1 :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
431
    apply _ ||
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
432
    let P := match goal with |- IntoWand _ _ ?P _ _ => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
433
    fail "iSpecialize:" P "not an implication/wand" in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
434 435 436
  let rec go H1 pats :=
    lazymatch pats with
    | [] => idtac
437 438 439
    | SForall :: ?pats =>
       idtac "the * specialization pattern is deprecated because it is applied implicitly";
       go H1 pats
440
    | SName ?H2 :: ?pats =>
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
441
       eapply tac_specialize with _ _ H2 _ H1 _ _ _ _; (* (j:=H1) (i:=H2) *)
442 443
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H2 "not found"
         |env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H1 "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
444
         |apply _ ||
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
445 446
          let P := match goal with |- IntoWand _ _ ?P ?Q _ => P end in
          let Q := match goal with |- IntoWand _ _ ?P ?Q _ => Q end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
447
          fail "iSpecialize: cannot instantiate" P "with" Q
448
         |env_reflexivity|go H1 pats]
449 450
    | SPureGoal ?d :: ?pats =>
       eapply tac_specialize_assert_pure with _ H1 _ _ _ _ _;
451
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H1 "not found"
452
         |solve_to_wand H1
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
453 454 455
         |apply _ ||
          let Q := match goal with |- FromPure ?Q _ => Q end in
          fail "iSpecialize:" Q "not pure"
456
         |env_reflexivity
457
         |done_if d (*goal*)
458
         |go H1 pats]
459 460
    | SGoal (SpecGoal GPersistent false ?Hs_frame [] ?d) :: ?pats =>
       eapply tac_specialize_assert_persistent with _ _ H1 _ _ _ _;
461
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H1 "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
462
         |solve_to_wand H1
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
463
         |apply _ ||
464
          let Q := match goal with |- Persistent ?Q => Q end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
465
          fail "iSpecialize:" Q "not persistent"
466
         |env_reflexivity
467
         |iFrame Hs_frame; done_if d (*goal*)
468
         |go H1 pats]
469 470 471
    | SGoal (SpecGoal GPersistent _ _ _ _) :: ?pats =>
       fail "iSpecialize: cannot select hypotheses for persistent premise"
    | SGoal (SpecGoal ?m ?lr ?Hs_frame ?Hs ?d) :: ?pats =>
472
       let Hs' := eval cbv in (if lr then Hs else Hs_frame ++ Hs) in
473
       eapply tac_specialize_assert with _ _ _ H1 _ lr Hs' _ _ _ _;
474
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H1 "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
475
         |solve_to_wand H1
476 477 478
         |lazymatch m with
          | GSpatial => apply elim_modal_dummy
          | GModal => apply _ || fail "iSpecialize: goal not a modality"
479
          end
480 481
         |env_reflexivity ||
          let Hs' := iMissingHyps Hs' in
482
          fail "iSpecialize: hypotheses" Hs' "not found"
483
         |iFrame Hs_frame; done_if d (*goal*)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
484
         |go H1 pats]
485 486
    | SAutoFrame GPersistent :: ?pats =>
       eapply tac_specialize_assert_persistent with _ _ H1 _ _ _ _;
487
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H1 "not found"
488
         |solve_to_wand H1
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
489
         |apply _ ||
490
          let Q := match goal with |- Persistent ?Q => Q end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
491
          fail "iSpecialize:" Q "not persistent"
492
         |env_reflexivity
493 494 495 496
         |solve [iFrame "∗ #"]
         |go H1 pats]
    | SAutoFrame ?m :: ?pats =>
       eapply tac_specialize_frame with _ H1 _ _ _ _ _ _;
497
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H1 "not found"
498 499 500 501 502
         |solve_to_wand H1
         |lazymatch m with
          | GSpatial => apply elim_modal_dummy
          | GModal => apply _ || fail "iSpecialize: goal not a modality"
          end
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
503 504
         |iFrame "∗ #"; apply tac_unlock ||
          fail "iSpecialize: premise cannot be solved by framing"
505
         |reflexivity]; iIntro H1; go H1 pats
506 507
    end in let pats := spec_pat.parse pat in go H pats.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
508
(* The argument [p] denotes whether the conclusion of the specialized term is
509 510 511
persistent. If so, one can use all spatial hypotheses for both proving the
premises and the remaning goal. The argument [p] can either be a Boolean or an
introduction pattern, which will be coerced into [true] when it solely contains
512 513 514 515 516
`#` or `%` patterns at the top-level.

In case the specialization pattern in [t] states that the modality of the goal
should be kept for one of the premises (i.e. [>[H1 .. Hn]] is used) then [p]
defaults to [false] (i.e. spatial hypotheses are not preserved). *)
517
Tactic Notation "iSpecializeCore" open_constr(t) "as" constr(p) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
518
  let p := intro_pat_persistent p in
519 520
  let t :=
    match type of t with string => constr:(ITrm t hnil "") | _ => t end in
521 522
  lazymatch t with
  | ITrm ?H ?xs ?pat =>
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
523
    iSpecializeArgs H xs;
524 525
    lazymatch type of H with
    | string =>
526 527 528 529 530 531
      (* The lemma [tac_specialize_persistent_helper] allows one to use all
      spatial hypotheses for both proving the premises of the lemma we
      specialize as well as those of the remaining goal. We can only use it when
      the result of the specialization is persistent, and no modality is
      eliminated. As an optimization, we do not use this when only universal
      quantifiers are instantiated. *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
532
      let pat := spec_pat.parse pat in
533 534
      lazymatch eval compute in
        (bool_decide (pat  []) && p && negb (existsb spec_pat_modal pat)) with
535
      | true =>
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
536
         eapply tac_specialize_persistent_helper with _ H _ _ _ _;
537
           [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
538
           |iSpecializePat H pat; last (iExact H)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
539
           |apply _ ||
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
540
            let Q := match goal with |- IntoPersistent _ ?Q _ => Q end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
541
            fail "iSpecialize:" Q "not persistent"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
542 543 544 545 546 547
           |env_cbv; apply _ ||
            let Q := match goal with |- Affine ?Q => Q end in
            fail "iSpecialize:" Q "not affine"
           |env_reflexivity
           |(* goal *)]
      | false => iSpecializePat H pat
548 549
      end
    | _ => fail "iSpecialize:" H "should be a hypothesis, use iPoseProof instead"
550
    end
551
  | _ => fail "iSpecialize:" t "should be a proof mode term"
552
  end.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
553

554
Tactic Notation "iSpecialize" open_constr(t) :=
555 556 557
  iSpecializeCore t as false.
Tactic Notation "iSpecialize" open_constr(t) "as" "#" :=
  iSpecializeCore t as true.
558

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
559
(** * Pose proof *)
560 561
(* The tactic [iIntoValid] tactic solves a goal [uPred_valid Q]. The
arguments [t] is a Coq term whose type is of the following shape:
562

563
- [∀ (x_1 : A_1) .. (x_n : A_n), uPred_valid Q]
564
- [∀ (x_1 : A_1) .. (x_n : A_n), P1 ⊢ P2], in which case [Q] becomes [P1 -∗ P2]
565 566 567 568
- [∀ (x_1 : A_1) .. (x_n : A_n), P1 ⊣⊢ P2], in which case [Q] becomes [P1 ↔ P2]

The tactic instantiates each dependent argument [x_i] with an evar and generates
a goal [P] for non-dependent arguments [x_i : P]. *)
569
Tactic Notation "iIntoValid" open_constr(t) :=
570
  let rec go t :=
571
    let tT := type of t in
572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582
    lazymatch eval hnf in tT with
    | ?P  ?Q => let H := fresh in assert P as H; [|go uconstr:(t H); clear H]
    |  _ : ?T, _ =>
      (* Put [T] inside an [id] to avoid TC inference from being invoked. *)
      (* This is a workarround for Coq bug #4969. *)
      let e := fresh in evar (e:id T);
      let e' := eval unfold e in e in clear e; go (t e')
    | _ =>
      let tT' := eval cbv zeta in tT in apply (proj1 (_ : AsValid tT' _) t)
      || fail "iPoseProof: not a uPred"
    end in
583
  go t.
584

585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599
(* The tactic [tac] is called with a temporary fresh name [H]. The argument
[lazy_tc] denotes whether type class inference on the premises of [lem] should
be performed before (if false) or after (if true) [tac H] is called. *)
Tactic Notation "iPoseProofCore" open_constr(lem)
    "as" constr(p) constr(lazy_tc) tactic(tac) :=
  try iStartProof;
  let Htmp := iFresh in
  let t :=
    lazymatch lem with ITrm ?t ?xs ?pat => t | _ => lem end in
  let spec_tac _ :=
    lazymatch lem with
    | ITrm ?t ?xs ?pat => iSpecializeCore (ITrm Htmp xs pat) as p
    | _ => idtac
    end in
  let go goal_tac :=
600 601 602
    lazymatch type of t with
    | string =>
       eapply tac_pose_proof_hyp with _ _ t _ Htmp _;
603 604
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iPoseProof:" t "not found"
         |env_reflexivity || fail "iPoseProof:" Htmp "not fresh"
605
         |goal_tac ()]
606 607
    | _ =>
       eapply tac_pose_proof with _ Htmp _; (* (j:=H) *)
608
         [iIntoValid t
609
         |env_reflexivity || fail "iPoseProof:" Htmp "not fresh"
610
         |goal_tac ()]
611
    end;
612 613 614 615
    try (apply _) in
  lazymatch eval compute in lazy_tc with
  | true => go ltac:(fun _ => spec_tac (); last (tac Htmp))
  | false => go spec_tac; last (tac Htmp)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
616 617 618
  end.

(** * Apply *)
619
Tactic Notation "iApplyHyp" constr(H) :=
620 621
  let rec go H := first
    [eapply tac_apply with _ H _ _ _;
622
      [env_reflexivity
623 624
      |apply _
      |lazy beta (* reduce betas created by instantiation *)]
625
    |iSpecializePat H "[]"; last go H] in
626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633
  iExact H ||
  go H ||
  lazymatch iTypeOf H with
  | Some (_,?Q) => fail "iApply: cannot apply" Q
  end.

Tactic Notation "iApply" open_constr(lem) :=
  iPoseProofCore lem as false true (fun H => iApplyHyp H).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
634 635

(** * Revert *)
636
Local Tactic Notation "iForallRevert" ident(x) :=
637 638 639 640 641 642
  let err x :=
    intros x;
    iMatchHyp (fun H P =>
      lazymatch P with
      | context [x] => fail 2 "iRevert:" x "is used in hypothesis" H
      end) in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
643
  iStartProof;
644 645
  let A := type of x in
  lazymatch type of A with
646 647 648
  | Prop => revert x; first [apply tac_pure_revert|err x]
  | _ => revert x; first [apply tac_forall_revert|err x]
  end.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
649 650

Tactic Notation "iRevert" constr(Hs) :=
651 652
  let rec go Hs :=
    lazymatch Hs with
653
    | [] => idtac
654 655 656 657 658
    | ESelPure :: ?Hs =>
       repeat match goal with x : _ |- _ => revert x end;
       go Hs
    | ESelName _ ?H :: ?Hs =>
       eapply tac_revert with _ H _ _; (* (i:=H2) *)
659
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iRevert:" H "not found"
660
         |env_cbv; go Hs]
661
    end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
662
  let Hs := iElaborateSelPat Hs in iStartProof; go Hs.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
663

664
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ")" :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
665
  iForallRevert x1.
666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x2; iRevert ( x1 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x3; iRevert ( x1 x2 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x4; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x5; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ident(x6) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x6; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ident(x6) ident(x7) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x7; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ident(x6) ident(x7) ident(x8) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x8; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 ).

Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4) ")"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
692
    constr(Hs) :=
693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ident(x6) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ident(x6) ident(x7) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ident(x6) ident(x7) ident(x8) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 x8 ).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
706 707 708

(** * Disjunction *)
Tactic Notation "iLeft" :=
709
  iStartProof;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
710
  eapply tac_or_l;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
711 712 713 714
    [apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- FromOr ?P _ _ => P end in
     fail "iLeft:" P "not a disjunction"
    |].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
715
Tactic Notation "iRight" :=
716
  iStartProof;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
717
  eapply tac_or_r;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
718 719 720 721
    [apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- FromOr ?P _ _ => P end in
     fail "iRight:" P "not a disjunction"
    |].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
722

723
Local Tactic Notation "iOrDestruct" constr(H) "as" constr(H1) constr(H2) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
724
  eapply tac_or_destruct with _ _ H _ H1 H2 _ _ _; (* (i:=H) (j1:=H1) (j2:=H2) *)
725
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iOrDestruct:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
726 727 728
    |apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- IntoOr ?P _ _ => P end in
     fail "iOrDestruct: cannot destruct" P
729
    |env_reflexivity || fail "iOrDestruct:" H1 "not fresh"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
730 731
    |env_reflexivity || fail "iOrDestruct:" H2 "not fresh"
    | |].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
732 733 734

(** * Conjunction and separating conjunction *)
Tactic Notation "iSplit" :=
735
  iStartProof;
736 737 738
  lazymatch goal with
  | |- _  _ =>
    eapply tac_and_split;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
739
      [apply _ ||
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
740
       let P := match goal with |- FromAnd ?P _ _ => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
741
       fail "iSplit:" P "not a conjunction"| |]
742
  end.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
743 744

Tactic Notation "iSplitL" constr(Hs) :=
745
  iStartProof;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
746 747
  let Hs := words Hs in
  eapply tac_sep_split with _ _ false Hs _ _; (* (js:=Hs) *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
748
    [apply _ ||
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
749
     let P := match goal with |- FromSep _ ?P _ _ => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
750
     fail "iSplitL:" P "not a separating conjunction"
751 752
    |env_reflexivity ||
     let Hs := iMissingHyps Hs in
753
     fail "iSplitL: hypotheses" Hs "not found"
754 755
    | |].

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
756
Tactic Notation "iSplitR" constr(Hs) :=
757
  iStartProof;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
758 759
  let Hs := words Hs in
  eapply tac_sep_split with _ _ true Hs _ _; (* (js:=Hs) *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
760
    [apply _ ||
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
761
     let P := match goal with |- FromSep _ ?P _ _ => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
762
     fail "iSplitR:" P "not a separating conjunction"
763 764
    |env_reflexivity ||
     let Hs := iMissingHyps Hs in
765
     fail "iSplitR: hypotheses" Hs "not found"
766
    | |].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
767 768 769 770

Tactic Notation "iSplitL" := iSplitR "".
Tactic Notation "iSplitR" := iSplitL "".

771 772
Local Tactic Notation "iAndDestruct" constr(H) "as" constr(H1) constr(H2) :=
  eapply tac_and_destruct with _ H _ H1 H2 _ _ _; (* (i:=H) (j1:=H1) (j2:=H2) *)
773
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iAndDestruct:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
774
    |apply _ ||
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
775
     let P := match goal with |- IntoSep _ ?P _ _ => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
776
     fail "iAndDestruct: cannot destruct" P
777
    |env_reflexivity || fail "iAndDestruct:" H1 "or" H2 " not fresh"|].
778 779 780

Local Tactic Notation "iAndDestructChoice" constr(H) "as" constr(lr) constr(H') :=
  eapply tac_and_destruct_choice with _ H _ lr H' _ _ _;
781
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iAndDestructChoice:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
782 783
    |env_cbv; apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- TCOr (IntoAnd _ ?P _ _) _ => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
784
     fail "iAndDestructChoice: cannot destruct" P
785
    |env_reflexivity || fail "iAndDestructChoice:" H' " not fresh"|].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
786