tactics.v 78.3 KB
Newer Older
1
From iris.proofmode Require Import coq_tactics.
2
From iris.proofmode Require Import base intro_patterns spec_patterns sel_patterns.
3
From iris.base_logic Require Export base_logic big_op.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
4
From iris.proofmode Require Export classes notation.
5
From iris.proofmode Require Import class_instances.
Ralf Jung's avatar
Ralf Jung committed
6
From stdpp Require Import stringmap hlist.
7
Set Default Proof Using "Type".
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
8
9

Declare Reduction env_cbv := cbv [
10
  beq ascii_beq string_beq
11
12
  env_lookup env_lookup_delete env_delete env_app env_replace env_dom
  env_persistent env_spatial env_spatial_is_nil envs_dom
13
  envs_lookup envs_lookup_delete envs_delete envs_snoc envs_app
14
15
    envs_simple_replace envs_replace envs_split
    envs_clear_spatial envs_clear_persistent
16
    envs_split_go envs_split].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
17
18
Ltac env_cbv :=
  match goal with |- ?u => let v := eval env_cbv in u in change v end.
19
Ltac env_reflexivity := env_cbv; exact eq_refl.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
20

21
(** * Misc *)
22
23
(* Tactic Notation tactics cannot return terms *)
Ltac iFresh' H :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
24
  lazymatch goal with
25
  |- envs_entails ?Δ _ =>
26
27
28
     (* [vm_compute fails] if any of the hypotheses in [Δ] contain evars, so
     first use [cbv] to compute the domain of [Δ] *)
     let Hs := eval cbv in (envs_dom Δ) in
29
30
     eval vm_compute in (fresh_string_of_set H (of_list Hs))
  | _ => H
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
31
  end.
32
Ltac iFresh := iFresh' "~".
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
33

34
35
36
Ltac iMissingHyps Hs :=
  let Δ :=
    lazymatch goal with
37
    | |- envs_entails ?Δ _ => Δ
38
39
40
41
42
    | |- context[ envs_split _ _ ?Δ ] => Δ
    end in
  let Hhyps := eval env_cbv in (envs_dom Δ) in
  eval vm_compute in (list_difference Hs Hhyps).

43
Ltac iTypeOf H :=
44
  let Δ := match goal with |- envs_entails ?Δ _ => Δ end in
45
  eval env_cbv in (envs_lookup H Δ).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
46

47
Tactic Notation "iMatchHyp" tactic1(tac) :=
48
49
50
51
  match goal with
  | |- context[ environments.Esnoc _ ?x ?P ] => tac x P
  end.

52
Class AsValid {M} (φ : Prop) (P : uPred M) := as_valid : φ  P.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
53
54
Arguments AsValid {_} _%type _%I.

55
56
57
58
59
Lemma as_valid_1 (φ : Prop) {M} (P : uPred M) `{!AsValid φ P} : φ  P.
Proof. by apply as_valid. Qed.
Lemma as_valid_2 (φ : Prop) {M} (P : uPred M) `{!AsValid φ P} : P  φ.
Proof. by apply as_valid. Qed.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
Instance as_valid_valid {M} (P : uPred M) : AsValid (uPred_valid P) P | 0.
Proof. by rewrite /AsValid. Qed.

Instance as_valid_entails {M} (P Q : uPred M) : AsValid (P  Q) (P - Q) | 1.
Proof. split. apply uPred.entails_wand. apply uPred.wand_entails. Qed.

Instance as_valid_equiv {M} (P Q : uPred M) : AsValid (P  Q) (P  Q).
Proof. split. apply uPred.equiv_iff. apply uPred.iff_equiv. Qed.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
69
(** * Start a proof *)
70
Ltac iStartProof :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
71
  lazymatch goal with
72
  | |- envs_entails _ _ => idtac
73
74
75
  | |- ?φ => eapply (as_valid_2 φ);
               [apply _ || fail "iStartProof: not a uPred"
               |apply tac_adequate]
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
76
77
78
79
80
  end.

(** * Context manipulation *)
Tactic Notation "iRename" constr(H1) "into" constr(H2) :=
  eapply tac_rename with _ H1 H2 _ _; (* (i:=H1) (j:=H2) *)
81
82
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iRename:" H1 "not found"
    |env_reflexivity || fail "iRename:" H2 "not fresh"|].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
83

84
85
86
87
Local Inductive esel_pat :=
  | ESelPure
  | ESelName : bool  string  esel_pat.

88
Ltac iElaborateSelPat pat :=
89
90
  let rec go pat Δ Hs :=
    lazymatch pat with
91
    | [] => eval cbv in Hs
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
    | SelPure :: ?pat => go pat Δ (ESelPure :: Hs)
    | SelPersistent :: ?pat =>
       let Hs' := eval env_cbv in (env_dom (env_persistent Δ)) in
       let Δ' := eval env_cbv in (envs_clear_persistent Δ) in
       go pat Δ' ((ESelName true <$> Hs') ++ Hs)
    | SelSpatial :: ?pat =>
       let Hs' := eval env_cbv in (env_dom (env_spatial Δ)) in
       let Δ' := eval env_cbv in (envs_clear_spatial Δ) in
       go pat Δ' ((ESelName false <$> Hs') ++ Hs)
    | SelName ?H :: ?pat =>
       lazymatch eval env_cbv in (envs_lookup_delete H Δ) with
       | Some (?p,_,?Δ') => go pat Δ' (ESelName p H :: Hs)
       | None => fail "iElaborateSelPat:" H "not found"
       end
    end in
  lazymatch goal with
108
  | |- envs_entails ?Δ _ =>
109
110
111
    let pat := sel_pat.parse pat in go pat Δ (@nil esel_pat)
  end.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
112
113
Tactic Notation "iClear" constr(Hs) :=
  let rec go Hs :=
114
    lazymatch Hs with
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
115
    | [] => idtac
116
117
    | ESelPure :: ?Hs => clear; go Hs
    | ESelName _ ?H :: ?Hs =>
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
118
       eapply tac_clear with _ H _ _; (* (i:=H) *)
119
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iClear:" H "not found"|go Hs]
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
120
    end in
121
  let Hs := iElaborateSelPat Hs in go Hs.
122

123
124
Tactic Notation "iClear" "(" ident_list(xs) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iClear Hs; clear xs.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
125
126
127

(** * Assumptions *)
Tactic Notation "iExact" constr(H) :=
128
  eapply tac_assumption with H _ _; (* (i:=H) *)
129
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iExact:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
130
131
132
    |apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- FromAssumption _ ?P _ => P end in
     fail "iExact:" H ":" P "does not match goal"].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140

Tactic Notation "iAssumptionCore" :=
  let rec find Γ i P :=
    match Γ with
    | Esnoc ?Γ ?j ?Q => first [unify P Q; unify i j| find Γ i P]
    end in
  match goal with
  | |- envs_lookup ?i (Envs ?Γp ?Γs) = Some (_, ?P) =>
141
     first [is_evar i; fail 1 | env_reflexivity]
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
142
  | |- envs_lookup ?i (Envs ?Γp ?Γs) = Some (_, ?P) =>
143
     is_evar i; first [find Γp i P | find Γs i P]; env_reflexivity
144
  | |- envs_lookup_delete ?i (Envs ?Γp ?Γs) = Some (_, ?P, _) =>
145
     first [is_evar i; fail 1 | env_reflexivity]
146
  | |- envs_lookup_delete ?i (Envs ?Γp ?Γs) = Some (_, ?P, _) =>
147
     is_evar i; first [find Γp i P | find Γs i P]; env_reflexivity
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
148
  end.
149

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
150
Tactic Notation "iAssumption" :=
151
152
153
154
  let Hass := fresh in
  let rec find p Γ Q :=
    match Γ with
    | Esnoc ?Γ ?j ?P => first
155
       [pose proof (_ : FromAssumption p P Q) as Hass;
156
        apply (tac_assumption _ j p P); [env_reflexivity|apply Hass]
157
158
159
       |find p Γ Q]
    end in
  match goal with
160
  | |- envs_entails (Envs ?Γp ?Γs) ?Q =>
161
162
163
     first [find true Γp Q | find false Γs Q
           |fail "iAssumption:" Q "not found"]
  end.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
164
165
166
167
168

(** * False *)
Tactic Notation "iExFalso" := apply tac_ex_falso.

(** * Making hypotheses persistent or pure *)
169
Local Tactic Notation "iPersistent" constr(H) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
170
  eapply tac_persistent with _ H _ _ _; (* (i:=H) *)
171
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iPersistent:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
172
    |apply _ ||
173
     let Q := match goal with |- IntoPersistent _ ?Q _ => Q end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
174
     fail "iPersistent:" Q "not persistent"
175
    |env_reflexivity|].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
176

177
Local Tactic Notation "iPure" constr(H) "as" simple_intropattern(pat) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
178
  eapply tac_pure with _ H _ _ _; (* (i:=H1) *)
179
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iPure:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
180
181
182
    |apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- IntoPure ?P _ => P end in
     fail "iPure:" P "not pure"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
183
184
    |intros pat].

185
Tactic Notation "iPureIntro" :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
186
  iStartProof;
187
  eapply tac_pure_intro;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
188
189
190
191
    [apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- FromPure ?P _ => P end in
     fail "iPureIntro:" P "not pure"
    |].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
192

193
194
195
196
(** Framing *)
Local Ltac iFrameFinish :=
  lazy iota beta;
  try match goal with
197
  | |- envs_entails _ True => exact (uPred.pure_intro _ _ I)
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
  end.

Local Ltac iFramePure t :=
  let φ := type of t in
  eapply (tac_frame_pure _ _ _ _ t);
    [apply _ || fail "iFrame: cannot frame" φ
    |iFrameFinish].

Local Ltac iFrameHyp H :=
  eapply tac_frame with _ H _ _ _;
208
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iFrame:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
209
210
211
    |apply _ ||
     let R := match goal with |- Frame _ ?R _ _ => R end in
     fail "iFrame: cannot frame" R
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
    |iFrameFinish].

Local Ltac iFrameAnyPure :=
  repeat match goal with H : _ |- _ => iFramePure H end.

Local Ltac iFrameAnyPersistent :=
  let rec go Hs :=
    match Hs with [] => idtac | ?H :: ?Hs => repeat iFrameHyp H; go Hs end in
  match goal with
221
  | |- envs_entails ?Δ _ =>
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
     let Hs := eval cbv in (env_dom (env_persistent Δ)) in go Hs
  end.

Local Ltac iFrameAnySpatial :=
  let rec go Hs :=
    match Hs with [] => idtac | ?H :: ?Hs => try iFrameHyp H; go Hs end in
  match goal with
229
  | |- envs_entails ?Δ _ =>
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
     let Hs := eval cbv in (env_dom (env_spatial Δ)) in go Hs
  end.

Tactic Notation "iFrame" := iFrameAnySpatial.

Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 ).
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 ).
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 ).
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 ).
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) constr(t6) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 ).
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) constr(t6) constr(t7) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 t7 ).
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) constr(t6) constr(t7) constr(t8)")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 t7 t8 ).

Tactic Notation "iFrame" constr(Hs) :=
  let rec go Hs :=
258
    lazymatch Hs with
259
    | [] => idtac
260
261
262
263
    | SelPure :: ?Hs => iFrameAnyPure; go Hs
    | SelPersistent :: ?Hs => iFrameAnyPersistent; go Hs
    | SelSpatial :: ?Hs => iFrameAnySpatial; go Hs
    | SelName ?H :: ?Hs => iFrameHyp H; go Hs
264
    end
265
  in let Hs := sel_pat.parse Hs in go Hs.
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 ) Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 ) Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4) ")"
    constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 ) Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 ) Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) constr(t6) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 ) Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) constr(t6) constr(t7) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 t7 ) Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) constr(t6) constr(t7) constr(t8)")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 t7 t8 ) Hs.

288
289
290
(** * Basic introduction tactics *)
Local Tactic Notation "iIntro" "(" simple_intropattern(x) ")" :=
  try iStartProof;
291
  lazymatch goal with
292
  | |- envs_entails _ _ =>
293
    eapply tac_forall_intro;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
294
      [apply _ ||
295
296
297
298
299
       let P := match goal with |- FromForall ?P _ => P end in
       fail "iIntro: cannot turn" P "into a universal quantifier"
      |lazy beta; intros x]
  | |- _ => intros x
  end.
300
301
302
303
304
305

Local Tactic Notation "iIntro" constr(H) :=
  iStartProof;
  first
  [ (* (?Q → _) *)
    eapply tac_impl_intro with _ H; (* (i:=H) *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
306
      [env_cbv; apply _ ||
307
       let P := lazymatch goal with |- Persistent ?P => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
308
309
       fail 1 "iIntro: introducing non-persistent" H ":" P
              "into non-empty spatial context"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
310
311
      |env_reflexivity || fail "iIntro:" H "not fresh"
      |]
312
313
  | (* (_ -∗ _) *)
    eapply tac_wand_intro with _ H; (* (i:=H) *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
314
315
      [env_reflexivity || fail 1 "iIntro:" H "not fresh"
      |]
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
  | fail 1 "iIntro: nothing to introduce" ].

Local Tactic Notation "iIntro" "#" constr(H) :=
  iStartProof;
  first
  [ (* (?P → _) *)
    eapply tac_impl_intro_persistent with _ H _; (* (i:=H) *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
323
      [apply _ || 
324
       let P := match goal with |- IntoPersistent _ ?P _ => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
325
326
327
       fail 1 "iIntro: " P " not persistent"
      |env_reflexivity || fail 1 "iIntro:" H "not fresh"
      |]
328
329
  | (* (?P -∗ _) *)
    eapply tac_wand_intro_persistent with _ H _; (* (i:=H) *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
330
      [apply _ || 
331
       let P := match goal with |- IntoPersistent _ ?P _ => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
332
333
334
       fail 1 "iIntro: " P " not persistent"
      |env_reflexivity || fail 1 "iIntro:" H "not fresh"
      |]
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
  | fail 1 "iIntro: nothing to introduce" ].

Local Tactic Notation "iIntro" "_" :=
  try iStartProof;
  first
  [ (* (?Q → _) *) apply tac_impl_intro_drop
  | (* (_ -∗ _) *) apply tac_wand_intro_drop
  | (* (∀ _, _) *) iIntro (_)
  | fail 1 "iIntro: nothing to introduce" ].

Local Tactic Notation "iIntroForall" :=
  try iStartProof;
  lazymatch goal with
  | |-  _, ?P => fail
  | |-  _, _ => intro
350
  | |- envs_entails _ ( x : _, _) => let x' := fresh x in iIntro (x')
351
352
353
354
355
  end.
Local Tactic Notation "iIntro" :=
  try iStartProof;
  lazymatch goal with
  | |- _  ?P => intro
356
357
  | |- envs_entails _ (_ - _) => iIntro (?) || let H := iFresh in iIntro #H || iIntro H
  | |- envs_entails _ (_  _) => iIntro (?) || let H := iFresh in iIntro #H || iIntro H
358
359
  end.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
360
(** * Specialize *)
361
362
363
364
365
Record iTrm {X As} :=
  ITrm { itrm : X ; itrm_vars : hlist As ; itrm_hyps : string }.
Arguments ITrm {_ _} _ _ _.

Notation "( H $! x1 .. xn )" :=
366
  (ITrm H (hcons x1 .. (hcons xn hnil) ..) "") (at level 0, x1, xn at level 9).
367
Notation "( H $! x1 .. xn 'with' pat )" :=
368
  (ITrm H (hcons x1 .. (hcons xn hnil) ..) pat) (at level 0, x1, xn at level 9).
369
370
Notation "( H 'with' pat )" := (ITrm H hnil pat) (at level 0).

371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
(*
There is some hacky stuff going on here (most probably there is a Coq bug).
Holes -- like unresolved type class instances -- in the argument `xs` are
resolved at arbitrary moments. It seems that tactics like `apply`, `split` and
`eexists` trigger type class search to resolve these holes. To avoid TC being
triggered too eagerly, this tactic uses `refine` at various places instead of
`apply`.

TODO: Investigate what really is going on. Is there a related to Cog bug #5752?
When should holes in an `open_constr` be resolved?
*)
382
Local Tactic Notation "iSpecializeArgs" constr(H) open_constr(xs) :=
383
  let rec go xs :=
384
    lazymatch xs with
385
    | hnil => apply id (* Finally, trigger TC *)
386
    | hcons ?x ?xs =>
387
       eapply tac_forall_specialize with _ H _ _ _; (* (i:=H) (a:=x) *)
388
389
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H "not found"
         |typeclasses eauto ||
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
390
          let P := match goal with |- IntoForall ?P _ => P end in
391
392
393
394
          fail "iSpecialize: cannot instantiate" P "with" x
         |lazymatch goal with (* Force [A] in [ex_intro] to deal with coercions. *)
          | |-  _ : ?A, _ => refine (@ex_intro A _ x (conj _ _))
          end; [env_reflexivity|go xs]]
395
396
    end in
  go xs.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
397

398
Local Tactic Notation "iSpecializePat" open_constr(H) constr(pat) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
399
  let solve_to_wand H1 :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
400
    apply _ ||
401
    let P := match goal with |- IntoWand _ ?P _ _ => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
402
    fail "iSpecialize:" P "not an implication/wand" in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
403
404
405
  let rec go H1 pats :=
    lazymatch pats with
    | [] => idtac
406
407
408
    | SForall :: ?pats =>
       idtac "the * specialization pattern is deprecated because it is applied implicitly";
       go H1 pats
409
    | SName ?H2 :: ?pats =>
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
410
       eapply tac_specialize with _ _ H2 _ H1 _ _ _ _; (* (j:=H1) (i:=H2) *)
411
412
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H2 "not found"
         |env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H1 "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
413
         |apply _ ||
414
415
          let P := match goal with |- IntoWand _ ?P ?Q _ => P end in
          let Q := match goal with |- IntoWand _ ?P ?Q _ => Q end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
416
          fail "iSpecialize: cannot instantiate" P "with" Q
417
         |env_reflexivity|go H1 pats]
418
419
    | SPureGoal ?d :: ?pats =>
       eapply tac_specialize_assert_pure with _ H1 _ _ _ _ _;
420
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H1 "not found"
421
         |solve_to_wand H1
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
422
423
424
         |apply _ ||
          let Q := match goal with |- FromPure ?Q _ => Q end in
          fail "iSpecialize:" Q "not pure"
425
         |env_reflexivity
426
         |done_if d (*goal*)
427
         |go H1 pats]
428
429
    | SGoal (SpecGoal GPersistent false ?Hs_frame [] ?d) :: ?pats =>
       eapply tac_specialize_assert_persistent with _ _ H1 _ _ _ _;
430
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H1 "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
431
         |solve_to_wand H1
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
432
         |apply _ ||
433
          let Q := match goal with |- Persistent ?Q => Q end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
434
          fail "iSpecialize:" Q "not persistent"
435
         |env_reflexivity
436
         |iFrame Hs_frame; done_if d (*goal*)
437
         |go H1 pats]
438
439
440
    | SGoal (SpecGoal GPersistent _ _ _ _) :: ?pats =>
       fail "iSpecialize: cannot select hypotheses for persistent premise"
    | SGoal (SpecGoal ?m ?lr ?Hs_frame ?Hs ?d) :: ?pats =>
441
       let Hs' := eval cbv in (if lr then Hs else Hs_frame ++ Hs) in
442
       eapply tac_specialize_assert with _ _ _ H1 _ lr Hs' _ _ _ _;
443
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H1 "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
444
         |solve_to_wand H1
445
446
447
         |lazymatch m with
          | GSpatial => apply elim_modal_dummy
          | GModal => apply _ || fail "iSpecialize: goal not a modality"
448
          end
449
450
         |env_reflexivity ||
          let Hs' := iMissingHyps Hs' in
451
          fail "iSpecialize: hypotheses" Hs' "not found"
452
         |iFrame Hs_frame; done_if d (*goal*)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
453
         |go H1 pats]
454
455
    | SAutoFrame GPersistent :: ?pats =>
       eapply tac_specialize_assert_persistent with _ _ H1 _ _ _ _;
456
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H1 "not found"
457
         |solve_to_wand H1
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
458
         |apply _ ||
459
          let Q := match goal with |- Persistent ?Q => Q end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
460
          fail "iSpecialize:" Q "not persistent"
461
         |env_reflexivity
462
463
464
465
         |solve [iFrame "∗ #"]
         |go H1 pats]
    | SAutoFrame ?m :: ?pats =>
       eapply tac_specialize_frame with _ H1 _ _ _ _ _ _;
466
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H1 "not found"
467
468
469
470
471
         |solve_to_wand H1
         |lazymatch m with
          | GSpatial => apply elim_modal_dummy
          | GModal => apply _ || fail "iSpecialize: goal not a modality"
          end
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
472
473
         |iFrame "∗ #"; apply tac_unlock ||
          fail "iSpecialize: premise cannot be solved by framing"
474
         |reflexivity]; iIntro H1; go H1 pats
475
476
    end in let pats := spec_pat.parse pat in go H pats.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
477
(* The argument [p] denotes whether the conclusion of the specialized term is
478
479
480
persistent. If so, one can use all spatial hypotheses for both proving the
premises and the remaning goal. The argument [p] can either be a Boolean or an
introduction pattern, which will be coerced into [true] when it solely contains
481
482
483
484
485
`#` or `%` patterns at the top-level.

In case the specialization pattern in [t] states that the modality of the goal
should be kept for one of the premises (i.e. [>[H1 .. Hn]] is used) then [p]
defaults to [false] (i.e. spatial hypotheses are not preserved). *)
486
Tactic Notation "iSpecializeCore" open_constr(t) "as" constr(p) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
487
  let p := intro_pat_persistent p in
488
489
  let t :=
    match type of t with string => constr:(ITrm t hnil "") | _ => t end in
490
491
  lazymatch t with
  | ITrm ?H ?xs ?pat =>
492
    let pat := spec_pat.parse pat in
493
494
    lazymatch type of H with
    | string =>
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
      (* The lemma [tac_specialize_persistent_helper] allows one to use all
      spatial hypotheses for both proving the premises of the lemma we
      specialize as well as those of the remaining goal. We can only use it when
      the result of the specialization is persistent, and no modality is
      eliminated. As an optimization, we do not use this when only universal
      quantifiers are instantiated. *)
      lazymatch eval compute in
        (bool_decide (pat  []) && p && negb (existsb spec_pat_modal pat)) with
503
504
      | true =>
         eapply tac_specialize_persistent_helper with _ H _ _ _;
505
           [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H "not found"
506
           |iSpecializeArgs H xs; iSpecializePat H pat; last (iExact H)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
507
           |apply _ ||
508
            let Q := match goal with |- Persistent ?Q => Q end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
509
            fail "iSpecialize:" Q "not persistent"
510
           |env_reflexivity|(* goal *)]
511
      | false => iSpecializeArgs H xs; iSpecializePat H pat
512
513
      end
    | _ => fail "iSpecialize:" H "should be a hypothesis, use iPoseProof instead"
514
    end
515
  | _ => fail "iSpecialize:" t "should be a proof mode term"
516
  end.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
517

518
Tactic Notation "iSpecialize" open_constr(t) :=
519
520
521
  iSpecializeCore t as false.
Tactic Notation "iSpecialize" open_constr(t) "as" "#" :=
  iSpecializeCore t as true.
522

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
523
(** * Pose proof *)
524
525
(* The tactic [iIntoValid] tactic solves a goal [uPred_valid Q]. The
arguments [t] is a Coq term whose type is of the following shape:
526

527
- [∀ (x_1 : A_1) .. (x_n : A_n), uPred_valid Q]
528
- [∀ (x_1 : A_1) .. (x_n : A_n), P1 ⊢ P2], in which case [Q] becomes [P1 -∗ P2]
529
530
531
532
- [∀ (x_1 : A_1) .. (x_n : A_n), P1 ⊣⊢ P2], in which case [Q] becomes [P1 ↔ P2]

The tactic instantiates each dependent argument [x_i] with an evar and generates
a goal [P] for non-dependent arguments [x_i : P]. *)
533
Tactic Notation "iIntoValid" open_constr(t) :=
534
  let rec go t :=
535
    let tT := type of t in
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
    lazymatch eval hnf in tT with
    | ?P  ?Q => let H := fresh in assert P as H; [|go uconstr:(t H); clear H]
    |  _ : ?T, _ =>
      (* Put [T] inside an [id] to avoid TC inference from being invoked. *)
      (* This is a workarround for Coq bug #4969. *)
      let e := fresh in evar (e:id T);
      let e' := eval unfold e in e in clear e; go (t e')
    | _ =>
544
545
      let tT' := eval cbv zeta in tT in apply (as_valid_1 tT');
        [apply _ || fail "iPoseProof: not a uPred"|exact t]
546
    end in
547
  go t.
548

549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
(* The tactic [tac] is called with a temporary fresh name [H]. The argument
[lazy_tc] denotes whether type class inference on the premises of [lem] should
be performed before (if false) or after (if true) [tac H] is called. *)
Tactic Notation "iPoseProofCore" open_constr(lem)
    "as" constr(p) constr(lazy_tc) tactic(tac) :=
  try iStartProof;
  let Htmp := iFresh in
  let t :=
    lazymatch lem with ITrm ?t ?xs ?pat => t | _ => lem end in
  let spec_tac _ :=
    lazymatch lem with
    | ITrm ?t ?xs ?pat => iSpecializeCore (ITrm Htmp xs pat) as p
    | _ => idtac
    end in
  let go goal_tac :=
564
565
566
    lazymatch type of t with
    | string =>
       eapply tac_pose_proof_hyp with _ _ t _ Htmp _;
567
568
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iPoseProof:" t "not found"
         |env_reflexivity || fail "iPoseProof:" Htmp "not fresh"
569
         |goal_tac ()]
570
571
    | _ =>
       eapply tac_pose_proof with _ Htmp _; (* (j:=H) *)
572
         [iIntoValid t
573
         |env_reflexivity || fail "iPoseProof:" Htmp "not fresh"
574
         |goal_tac ()]
575
    end;
576
577
578
579
    try (apply _) in
  lazymatch eval compute in lazy_tc with
  | true => go ltac:(fun _ => spec_tac (); last (tac Htmp))
  | false => go spec_tac; last (tac Htmp)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
580
581
582
  end.

(** * Apply *)
583
Tactic Notation "iApplyHyp" constr(H) :=
584
585
  let rec go H := first
    [eapply tac_apply with _ H _ _ _;
586
      [env_reflexivity
587
588
      |apply _
      |lazy beta (* reduce betas created by instantiation *)]
589
    |iSpecializePat H "[]"; last go H] in
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
  iExact H ||
  go H ||
  lazymatch iTypeOf H with
  | Some (_,?Q) => fail "iApply: cannot apply" Q
  end.

Tactic Notation "iApply" open_constr(lem) :=
  iPoseProofCore lem as false true (fun H => iApplyHyp H).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
598
599

(** * Revert *)
600
Local Tactic Notation "iForallRevert" ident(x) :=
601
602
603
604
605
606
  let err x :=
    intros x;
    iMatchHyp (fun H P =>
      lazymatch P with
      | context [x] => fail 2 "iRevert:" x "is used in hypothesis" H
      end) in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
607
  iStartProof;
608
609
  let A := type of x in
  lazymatch type of A with
610
611
612
  | Prop => revert x; first [apply tac_pure_revert|err x]
  | _ => revert x; first [apply tac_forall_revert|err x]
  end.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
613
614

Tactic Notation "iRevert" constr(Hs) :=
615
616
  let rec go Hs :=
    lazymatch Hs with
617
    | [] => idtac
618
619
620
621
622
    | ESelPure :: ?Hs =>
       repeat match goal with x : _ |- _ => revert x end;
       go Hs
    | ESelName _ ?H :: ?Hs =>
       eapply tac_revert with _ H _ _; (* (i:=H2) *)
623
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iRevert:" H "not found"
624
         |env_cbv; go Hs]
625
    end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
626
  let Hs := iElaborateSelPat Hs in iStartProof; go Hs.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
627

628
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ")" :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
629
  iForallRevert x1.
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x2; iRevert ( x1 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x3; iRevert ( x1 x2 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x4; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x5; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ident(x6) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x6; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ident(x6) ident(x7) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x7; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ident(x6) ident(x7) ident(x8) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x8; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 ).

Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4) ")"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
656
    constr(Hs) :=
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ident(x6) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ident(x6) ident(x7) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ident(x6) ident(x7) ident(x8) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 x8 ).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
670
671
672

(** * Disjunction *)
Tactic Notation "iLeft" :=
673
  iStartProof;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
674
  eapply tac_or_l;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
675
676
677
678
    [apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- FromOr ?P _ _ => P end in
     fail "iLeft:" P "not a disjunction"
    |].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
679
Tactic Notation "iRight" :=
680
  iStartProof;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
681
  eapply tac_or_r;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
682
683
684
685
    [apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- FromOr ?P _ _ => P end in
     fail "iRight:" P "not a disjunction"
    |].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
686

687
Local Tactic Notation "iOrDestruct" constr(H) "as" constr(H1) constr(H2) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
688
  eapply tac_or_destruct with _ _ H _ H1 H2 _ _ _; (* (i:=H) (j1:=H1) (j2:=H2) *)
689
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iOrDestruct:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
690
691
692
    |apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- IntoOr ?P _ _ => P end in
     fail "iOrDestruct: cannot destruct" P
693
    |env_reflexivity || fail "iOrDestruct:" H1 "not fresh"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
694
695
    |env_reflexivity || fail "iOrDestruct:" H2 "not fresh"
    | |].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
696
697
698

(** * Conjunction and separating conjunction *)
Tactic Notation "iSplit" :=
699
  iStartProof;
700
701
702
703
  eapply tac_and_split;
    [apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- FromAnd _ ?P _ _ => P end in
     fail "iSplit:" P "not a conjunction"| |].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
704
705

Tactic Notation "iSplitL" constr(Hs) :=
706
  iStartProof;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
707
  let Hs := words Hs in
708
  eapply tac_sep_split with _ _ Left Hs _ _; (* (js:=Hs) *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
709
    [apply _ ||
710
     let P := match goal with |- FromAnd _ ?P _ _ => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
711
     fail "iSplitL:" P "not a separating conjunction"
712
713
    |env_reflexivity ||
     let Hs := iMissingHyps Hs in
714
     fail "iSplitL: hypotheses" Hs "not found"
715
716
    | |].

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
717
Tactic Notation "iSplitR" constr(Hs) :=
718
  iStartProof;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
719
  let Hs := words Hs in
720
  eapply tac_sep_split with _ _ Right Hs _ _; (* (js:=Hs) *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
721
    [apply _ ||
722
     let P := match goal with |- FromAnd _ ?P _ _ => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
723
     fail "iSplitR:" P "not a separating conjunction"
724
725
    |env_reflexivity ||
     let Hs := iMissingHyps Hs in
726
     fail "iSplitR: hypotheses" Hs "not found"
727
    | |].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
728
729
730
731

Tactic Notation "iSplitL" := iSplitR "".
Tactic Notation "iSplitR" := iSplitL "".

732
733
Local Tactic Notation "iAndDestruct" constr(H) "as" constr(H1) constr(H2) :=
  eapply tac_and_destruct with _ H _ H1 H2 _ _ _; (* (i:=H) (j1:=H1) (j2:=H2) *)
734
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iAndDestruct:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
735
736
737
    |apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- IntoAnd _ ?P _ _ => P end in
     fail "iAndDestruct: cannot destruct" P
738
    |env_reflexivity || fail "iAndDestruct:" H1 "or" H2 " not fresh"|].
739

740
741
Local Tactic Notation "iAndDestructChoice" constr(H) "as" constr(d) constr(H') :=
  eapply tac_and_destruct_choice with _ H _ d H' _ _ _;
742
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iAndDestructChoice:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
743
744
745
    |apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- IntoAnd _ ?P _ _ => P end in
     fail "iAndDestructChoice: cannot destruct" P
746
    |env_reflexivity || fail "iAndDestructChoice:" H' " not fresh"|].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
747

748
749
750
751
(** * Combinining hypotheses *)
Tactic Notation "iCombine" constr(Hs) "as" constr(H) :=
  let Hs := words Hs in
  eapply tac_combine with _ _ Hs _ _ H _;
752
753
    [env_reflexivity ||
     let Hs := iMissingHyps Hs in
754
     fail "iCombine: hypotheses" Hs "not found"
755
    |apply _
756
    |env_reflexivity || fail "iCombine:" H "not fresh"|].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
757

758
759
760
Tactic Notation "iCombine" constr(H1) constr(H2) "as" constr(H) :=
  iCombine [H1;H2] as H.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
761
(** * Existential *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
762
Tactic Notation "iExists" uconstr(x1) :=
763
  iStartProof;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
764
  eapply tac_exist;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
765
766
767
    [apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- FromExist ?P _ => P end in
     fail "iExists:" P "not an existential"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
768
    |cbv beta; eexists x1].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
769

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
770
Tactic Notation "iExists" uconstr(x1) "," uconstr(x2) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
771
  iExists x1; iExists x2.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
772
Tactic Notation "iExists" uconstr(x1) "," uconstr(x2) "," uconstr(x3) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
773
  iExists x1; iExists x2, x3.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
774
775
Tactic Notation "iExists" uconstr(x1) "," uconstr(x2) "," uconstr(x3) ","
    uconstr(x4) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
776
  iExists x1; iExists x2, x3, x4.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
777
778
Tactic Notation "iExists" uconstr(x1) "," uconstr(x2) "," uconstr(x3) ","
    uconstr(x4) "," uconstr(x5) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
779
  iExists x1; iExists x2, x3, x4, x5.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
780
781
Tactic Notation "iExists" uconstr(x1) "," uconstr(x2) "," uconstr(x3) ","
    uconstr(x4) "," uconstr(x5) "," uconstr(x6) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
782
  iExists x1; iExists x2, x3, x4, x5, x6.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
783
784
Tactic Notation "iExists" uconstr(x1) "," uconstr(x2) "," uconstr(x3) ","
    uconstr(x4) "," uconstr(x5) "," uconstr(x6) "," uconstr(x7) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
785
  iExists x1; iExists x2, x3, x4, x5, x6, x7.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
786
787
788
Tactic Notation "iExists" uconstr(x1) "," uconstr(x2) "," uconstr(x3) ","
    uconstr(x4) "," uconstr(x5) "," uconstr(x6) "," uconstr(x7) ","
    uconstr(x8) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
789
790
  iExists x1; iExists x2, x3, x4, x5, x6, x7, x8.

791
792
Local Tactic Notation "iExistDestruct" constr(H)
    "as" simple_intropattern(x) constr(Hx) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
793
  eapply tac_exist_destruct with H _ Hx _ _; (* (i:=H) (j:=Hx) *)
794
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iExistDestruct:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
795
796
797
    |apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- IntoExist ?P _ => P end in
     fail "iExistDestruct: cannot destruct" P|];
798
799
  let y := fresh in
  intros y; eexists; split;
800
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iExistDestruct:" Hx "not fresh"
801
    |revert y; intros x].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
802

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
803
804
(** * Always *)
Tactic Notation "iAlways":=