tactics.v 79.3 KB
Newer Older
1
From iris.proofmode Require Import coq_tactics.
2
From iris.proofmode Require Import base intro_patterns spec_patterns sel_patterns.
3
From iris.base_logic Require Export base_logic big_op.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
4
From iris.proofmode Require Export classes notation.
5
From iris.proofmode Require Import class_instances.
6
From stdpp Require Import hlist pretty.
7
Set Default Proof Using "Type".
8
Export ident.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
9
10

Declare Reduction env_cbv := cbv [
11
  beq ascii_beq string_beq positive_beq ident_beq
12
13
  env_lookup env_lookup_delete env_delete env_app env_replace env_dom
  env_persistent env_spatial env_spatial_is_nil envs_dom
14
  envs_lookup envs_lookup_delete envs_delete envs_snoc envs_app
15
16
    envs_simple_replace envs_replace envs_split
    envs_clear_spatial envs_clear_persistent
17
    envs_split_go envs_split].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
18
19
Ltac env_cbv :=
  match goal with |- ?u => let v := eval env_cbv in u in change v end.
20
Ltac env_reflexivity := env_cbv; exact eq_refl.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
21

22
(** * Misc *)
23
(* Tactic Notation tactics cannot return terms *)
24
Ltac iFresh :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
25
  lazymatch goal with
26
  |- envs_entails ?Δ _ =>
27
28
29
     (* [vm_compute fails] if any of the hypotheses in [Δ] contain evars, so
     first use [cbv] to compute the domain of [Δ] *)
     let Hs := eval cbv in (envs_dom Δ) in
30
31
32
33
34
35
     eval vm_compute in
       (IAnon (match Hs with
         | [] => 1
         | _ => 1 + foldr Pos.max 1 (omap (maybe IAnon) Hs)
         end))%positive
  | _ => constr:(IAnon 1)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
36
37
  end.

38
39
40
Ltac iMissingHyps Hs :=
  let Δ :=
    lazymatch goal with
41
    | |- envs_entails ?Δ _ => Δ
42
43
44
45
46
    | |- context[ envs_split _ _ ?Δ ] => Δ
    end in
  let Hhyps := eval env_cbv in (envs_dom Δ) in
  eval vm_compute in (list_difference Hs Hhyps).

47
Ltac iTypeOf H :=
48
  let Δ := match goal with |- envs_entails ?Δ _ => Δ end in
49
  eval env_cbv in (envs_lookup H Δ).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
50

51
Tactic Notation "iMatchHyp" tactic1(tac) :=
52
53
54
55
  match goal with
  | |- context[ environments.Esnoc _ ?x ?P ] => tac x P
  end.

56
Class AsValid {M} (φ : Prop) (P : uPred M) := as_valid : φ  P.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
57
58
Arguments AsValid {_} _%type _%I.

59
60
61
62
63
Lemma as_valid_1 (φ : Prop) {M} (P : uPred M) `{!AsValid φ P} : φ  P.
Proof. by apply as_valid. Qed.
Lemma as_valid_2 (φ : Prop) {M} (P : uPred M) `{!AsValid φ P} : P  φ.
Proof. by apply as_valid. Qed.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
Instance as_valid_valid {M} (P : uPred M) : AsValid (uPred_valid P) P | 0.
Proof. by rewrite /AsValid. Qed.

Instance as_valid_entails {M} (P Q : uPred M) : AsValid (P  Q) (P - Q) | 1.
Proof. split. apply uPred.entails_wand. apply uPred.wand_entails. Qed.

Instance as_valid_equiv {M} (P Q : uPred M) : AsValid (P  Q) (P  Q).
Proof. split. apply uPred.equiv_iff. apply uPred.iff_equiv. Qed.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
73
(** * Start a proof *)
74
Ltac iStartProof :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
75
  lazymatch goal with
76
  | |- envs_entails _ _ => idtac
77
78
79
  | |- ?φ => eapply (as_valid_2 φ);
               [apply _ || fail "iStartProof: not a uPred"
               |apply tac_adequate]
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
80
81
82
83
84
  end.

(** * Context manipulation *)
Tactic Notation "iRename" constr(H1) "into" constr(H2) :=
  eapply tac_rename with _ H1 H2 _ _; (* (i:=H1) (j:=H2) *)
85
86
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iRename:" H1 "not found"
    |env_reflexivity || fail "iRename:" H2 "not fresh"|].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
87

88
89
Local Inductive esel_pat :=
  | ESelPure
90
  | ESelIdent : bool  ident  esel_pat.
91

92
Ltac iElaborateSelPat pat :=
93
94
  let rec go pat Δ Hs :=
    lazymatch pat with
95
    | [] => eval cbv in Hs
96
97
98
99
    | SelPure :: ?pat => go pat Δ (ESelPure :: Hs)
    | SelPersistent :: ?pat =>
       let Hs' := eval env_cbv in (env_dom (env_persistent Δ)) in
       let Δ' := eval env_cbv in (envs_clear_persistent Δ) in
100
       go pat Δ' ((ESelIdent true <$> Hs') ++ Hs)
101
102
103
    | SelSpatial :: ?pat =>
       let Hs' := eval env_cbv in (env_dom (env_spatial Δ)) in
       let Δ' := eval env_cbv in (envs_clear_spatial Δ) in
104
105
       go pat Δ' ((ESelIdent false <$> Hs') ++ Hs)
    | SelIdent ?H :: ?pat =>
106
       lazymatch eval env_cbv in (envs_lookup_delete H Δ) with
107
       | Some (?p,_,?Δ') => go pat Δ' (ESelIdent p H :: Hs)
108
109
110
111
       | None => fail "iElaborateSelPat:" H "not found"
       end
    end in
  lazymatch goal with
112
  | |- envs_entails ?Δ _ =>
113
114
115
    let pat := sel_pat.parse pat in go pat Δ (@nil esel_pat)
  end.

116
117
118
119
Local Ltac iClearHyp H :=
  eapply tac_clear with _ H _ _; (* (i:=H) *)
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iClear:" H "not found"|].

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
120
121
Tactic Notation "iClear" constr(Hs) :=
  let rec go Hs :=
122
    lazymatch Hs with
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
123
    | [] => idtac
124
    | ESelPure :: ?Hs => clear; go Hs
125
    | ESelIdent _ ?H :: ?Hs => iClearHyp H; go Hs
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
126
    end in
127
  let Hs := iElaborateSelPat Hs in go Hs.
128

129
130
Tactic Notation "iClear" "(" ident_list(xs) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iClear Hs; clear xs.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
131
132
133

(** * Assumptions *)
Tactic Notation "iExact" constr(H) :=
134
  eapply tac_assumption with H _ _; (* (i:=H) *)
135
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iExact:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
136
137
138
    |apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- FromAssumption _ ?P _ => P end in
     fail "iExact:" H ":" P "does not match goal"].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146

Tactic Notation "iAssumptionCore" :=
  let rec find Γ i P :=
    match Γ with
    | Esnoc ?Γ ?j ?Q => first [unify P Q; unify i j| find Γ i P]
    end in
  match goal with
  | |- envs_lookup ?i (Envs ?Γp ?Γs) = Some (_, ?P) =>
147
     first [is_evar i; fail 1 | env_reflexivity]
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
148
  | |- envs_lookup ?i (Envs ?Γp ?Γs) = Some (_, ?P) =>
149
     is_evar i; first [find Γp i P | find Γs i P]; env_reflexivity
150
  | |- envs_lookup_delete ?i (Envs ?Γp ?Γs) = Some (_, ?P, _) =>
151
     first [is_evar i; fail 1 | env_reflexivity]
152
  | |- envs_lookup_delete ?i (Envs ?Γp ?Γs) = Some (_, ?P, _) =>
153
     is_evar i; first [find Γp i P | find Γs i P]; env_reflexivity
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
154
  end.
155

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
156
Tactic Notation "iAssumption" :=
157
158
159
160
  let Hass := fresh in
  let rec find p Γ Q :=
    match Γ with
    | Esnoc ?Γ ?j ?P => first
161
       [pose proof (_ : FromAssumption p P Q) as Hass;
162
        apply (tac_assumption _ j p P); [env_reflexivity|apply Hass]
163
164
165
       |find p Γ Q]
    end in
  match goal with
166
  | |- envs_entails (Envs ?Γp ?Γs) ?Q =>
167
168
169
     first [find true Γp Q | find false Γs Q
           |fail "iAssumption:" Q "not found"]
  end.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
170
171
172
173
174

(** * False *)
Tactic Notation "iExFalso" := apply tac_ex_falso.

(** * Making hypotheses persistent or pure *)
175
Local Tactic Notation "iPersistent" constr(H) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
176
  eapply tac_persistent with _ H _ _ _; (* (i:=H) *)
177
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iPersistent:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
178
    |apply _ ||
179
     let Q := match goal with |- IntoPersistent _ ?Q _ => Q end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
180
     fail "iPersistent:" Q "not persistent"
181
    |env_reflexivity|].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
182

183
Local Tactic Notation "iPure" constr(H) "as" simple_intropattern(pat) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
184
  eapply tac_pure with _ H _ _ _; (* (i:=H1) *)
185
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iPure:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
186
187
188
    |apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- IntoPure ?P _ => P end in
     fail "iPure:" P "not pure"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
189
190
    |intros pat].

191
Tactic Notation "iPureIntro" :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
192
  iStartProof;
193
  eapply tac_pure_intro;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
194
195
196
197
    [apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- FromPure ?P _ => P end in
     fail "iPureIntro:" P "not pure"
    |].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
198

199
200
201
202
(** Framing *)
Local Ltac iFrameFinish :=
  lazy iota beta;
  try match goal with
203
  | |- envs_entails _ True => exact (uPred.pure_intro _ _ I)
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
  end.

Local Ltac iFramePure t :=
  let φ := type of t in
  eapply (tac_frame_pure _ _ _ _ t);
    [apply _ || fail "iFrame: cannot frame" φ
    |iFrameFinish].

Local Ltac iFrameHyp H :=
  eapply tac_frame with _ H _ _ _;
214
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iFrame:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
215
216
217
    |apply _ ||
     let R := match goal with |- Frame _ ?R _ _ => R end in
     fail "iFrame: cannot frame" R
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
    |iFrameFinish].

Local Ltac iFrameAnyPure :=
  repeat match goal with H : _ |- _ => iFramePure H end.

Local Ltac iFrameAnyPersistent :=
  let rec go Hs :=
    match Hs with [] => idtac | ?H :: ?Hs => repeat iFrameHyp H; go Hs end in
  match goal with
227
  | |- envs_entails ?Δ _ =>
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
     let Hs := eval cbv in (env_dom (env_persistent Δ)) in go Hs
  end.

Local Ltac iFrameAnySpatial :=
  let rec go Hs :=
    match Hs with [] => idtac | ?H :: ?Hs => try iFrameHyp H; go Hs end in
  match goal with
235
  | |- envs_entails ?Δ _ =>
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
     let Hs := eval cbv in (env_dom (env_spatial Δ)) in go Hs
  end.

Tactic Notation "iFrame" := iFrameAnySpatial.

Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 ).
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 ).
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 ).
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 ).
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) constr(t6) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 ).
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) constr(t6) constr(t7) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 t7 ).
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) constr(t6) constr(t7) constr(t8)")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 t7 t8 ).

Tactic Notation "iFrame" constr(Hs) :=
  let rec go Hs :=
264
    lazymatch Hs with
265
    | [] => idtac
266
267
268
    | SelPure :: ?Hs => iFrameAnyPure; go Hs
    | SelPersistent :: ?Hs => iFrameAnyPersistent; go Hs
    | SelSpatial :: ?Hs => iFrameAnySpatial; go Hs
269
    | SelIdent ?H :: ?Hs => iFrameHyp H; go Hs
270
    end
271
  in let Hs := sel_pat.parse Hs in go Hs.
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 ) Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 ) Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4) ")"
    constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 ) Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 ) Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) constr(t6) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 ) Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) constr(t6) constr(t7) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 t7 ) Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) constr(t6) constr(t7) constr(t8)")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 t7 t8 ) Hs.

294
295
296
(** * Basic introduction tactics *)
Local Tactic Notation "iIntro" "(" simple_intropattern(x) ")" :=
  try iStartProof;
297
  lazymatch goal with
298
  | |- envs_entails _ _ =>
299
    eapply tac_forall_intro;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
300
      [apply _ ||
301
302
303
304
305
       let P := match goal with |- FromForall ?P _ => P end in
       fail "iIntro: cannot turn" P "into a universal quantifier"
      |lazy beta; intros x]
  | |- _ => intros x
  end.
306
307
308
309
310
311

Local Tactic Notation "iIntro" constr(H) :=
  iStartProof;
  first
  [ (* (?Q → _) *)
    eapply tac_impl_intro with _ H; (* (i:=H) *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
312
      [env_cbv; apply _ ||
313
       let P := lazymatch goal with |- Persistent ?P => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
314
315
       fail 1 "iIntro: introducing non-persistent" H ":" P
              "into non-empty spatial context"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
316
317
      |env_reflexivity || fail "iIntro:" H "not fresh"
      |]
318
319
  | (* (_ -∗ _) *)
    eapply tac_wand_intro with _ H; (* (i:=H) *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
320
321
      [env_reflexivity || fail 1 "iIntro:" H "not fresh"
      |]
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
  | fail 1 "iIntro: nothing to introduce" ].

Local Tactic Notation "iIntro" "#" constr(H) :=
  iStartProof;
  first
  [ (* (?P → _) *)
    eapply tac_impl_intro_persistent with _ H _; (* (i:=H) *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
329
      [apply _ || 
330
       let P := match goal with |- IntoPersistent _ ?P _ => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
331
332
333
       fail 1 "iIntro: " P " not persistent"
      |env_reflexivity || fail 1 "iIntro:" H "not fresh"
      |]
334
335
  | (* (?P -∗ _) *)
    eapply tac_wand_intro_persistent with _ H _; (* (i:=H) *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
336
      [apply _ || 
337
       let P := match goal with |- IntoPersistent _ ?P _ => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
338
339
340
       fail 1 "iIntro: " P " not persistent"
      |env_reflexivity || fail 1 "iIntro:" H "not fresh"
      |]
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
  | fail 1 "iIntro: nothing to introduce" ].

Local Tactic Notation "iIntro" "_" :=
  try iStartProof;
  first
  [ (* (?Q → _) *) apply tac_impl_intro_drop
  | (* (_ -∗ _) *) apply tac_wand_intro_drop
  | (* (∀ _, _) *) iIntro (_)
  | fail 1 "iIntro: nothing to introduce" ].

Local Tactic Notation "iIntroForall" :=
  try iStartProof;
  lazymatch goal with
  | |-  _, ?P => fail
  | |-  _, _ => intro
356
  | |- envs_entails _ ( x : _, _) => let x' := fresh x in iIntro (x')
357
358
359
360
361
  end.
Local Tactic Notation "iIntro" :=
  try iStartProof;
  lazymatch goal with
  | |- _  ?P => intro
362
363
  | |- envs_entails _ (_ - _) => iIntro (?) || let H := iFresh in iIntro #H || iIntro H
  | |- envs_entails _ (_  _) => iIntro (?) || let H := iFresh in iIntro #H || iIntro H
364
365
  end.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
366
(** * Specialize *)
367
368
369
370
371
Record iTrm {X As} :=
  ITrm { itrm : X ; itrm_vars : hlist As ; itrm_hyps : string }.
Arguments ITrm {_ _} _ _ _.

Notation "( H $! x1 .. xn )" :=
372
  (ITrm H (hcons x1 .. (hcons xn hnil) ..) "") (at level 0, x1, xn at level 9).
373
Notation "( H $! x1 .. xn 'with' pat )" :=
374
  (ITrm H (hcons x1 .. (hcons xn hnil) ..) pat) (at level 0, x1, xn at level 9).
375
376
Notation "( H 'with' pat )" := (ITrm H hnil pat) (at level 0).

377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
(*
There is some hacky stuff going on here (most probably there is a Coq bug).
Holes -- like unresolved type class instances -- in the argument `xs` are
resolved at arbitrary moments. It seems that tactics like `apply`, `split` and
`eexists` trigger type class search to resolve these holes. To avoid TC being
triggered too eagerly, this tactic uses `refine` at various places instead of
`apply`.

TODO: Investigate what really is going on. Is there a related to Cog bug #5752?
When should holes in an `open_constr` be resolved?
*)
388
Local Tactic Notation "iSpecializeArgs" constr(H) open_constr(xs) :=
389
  let rec go xs :=
390
    lazymatch xs with
391
    | hnil => apply id (* Finally, trigger TC *)
392
    | hcons ?x ?xs =>
393
       eapply tac_forall_specialize with _ H _ _ _; (* (i:=H) (a:=x) *)
394
395
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H "not found"
         |typeclasses eauto ||
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
396
          let P := match goal with |- IntoForall ?P _ => P end in
397
398
399
400
          fail "iSpecialize: cannot instantiate" P "with" x
         |lazymatch goal with (* Force [A] in [ex_intro] to deal with coercions. *)
          | |-  _ : ?A, _ => refine (@ex_intro A _ x (conj _ _))
          end; [env_reflexivity|go xs]]
401
402
    end in
  go xs.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
403

404
Local Tactic Notation "iSpecializePat" open_constr(H) constr(pat) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
405
  let solve_to_wand H1 :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
406
    apply _ ||
407
    let P := match goal with |- IntoWand _ ?P _ _ => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
408
    fail "iSpecialize:" P "not an implication/wand" in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
409
410
411
  let rec go H1 pats :=
    lazymatch pats with
    | [] => idtac
412
413
414
    | SForall :: ?pats =>
       idtac "the * specialization pattern is deprecated because it is applied implicitly";
       go H1 pats
415
    | SIdent ?H2 :: ?pats =>
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
416
       eapply tac_specialize with _ _ H2 _ H1 _ _ _ _; (* (j:=H1) (i:=H2) *)
417
418
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H2 "not found"
         |env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H1 "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
419
         |apply _ ||
420
421
          let P := match goal with |- IntoWand _ ?P ?Q _ => P end in
          let Q := match goal with |- IntoWand _ ?P ?Q _ => Q end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
422
          fail "iSpecialize: cannot instantiate" P "with" Q
423
         |env_reflexivity|go H1 pats]
424
425
    | SPureGoal ?d :: ?pats =>
       eapply tac_specialize_assert_pure with _ H1 _ _ _ _ _;
426
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H1 "not found"
427
         |solve_to_wand H1
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
428
429
430
         |apply _ ||
          let Q := match goal with |- FromPure ?Q _ => Q end in
          fail "iSpecialize:" Q "not pure"
431
         |env_reflexivity
432
         |done_if d (*goal*)
433
         |go H1 pats]
434
435
    | SGoal (SpecGoal GPersistent false ?Hs_frame [] ?d) :: ?pats =>
       eapply tac_specialize_assert_persistent with _ _ H1 _ _ _ _;
436
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H1 "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
437
         |solve_to_wand H1
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
438
         |apply _ ||
439
          let Q := match goal with |- Persistent ?Q => Q end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
440
          fail "iSpecialize:" Q "not persistent"
441
         |env_reflexivity
442
         |iFrame Hs_frame; done_if d (*goal*)
443
         |go H1 pats]
444
445
446
    | SGoal (SpecGoal GPersistent _ _ _ _) :: ?pats =>
       fail "iSpecialize: cannot select hypotheses for persistent premise"
    | SGoal (SpecGoal ?m ?lr ?Hs_frame ?Hs ?d) :: ?pats =>
447
       let Hs' := eval cbv in (if lr then Hs else Hs_frame ++ Hs) in
448
       eapply tac_specialize_assert with _ _ _ H1 _ lr Hs' _ _ _ _;
449
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H1 "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
450
         |solve_to_wand H1
451
452
453
         |lazymatch m with
          | GSpatial => apply elim_modal_dummy
          | GModal => apply _ || fail "iSpecialize: goal not a modality"
454
          end
455
456
         |env_reflexivity ||
          let Hs' := iMissingHyps Hs' in
457
          fail "iSpecialize: hypotheses" Hs' "not found"
458
         |iFrame Hs_frame; done_if d (*goal*)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
459
         |go H1 pats]
460
461
    | SAutoFrame GPersistent :: ?pats =>
       eapply tac_specialize_assert_persistent with _ _ H1 _ _ _ _;
462
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H1 "not found"
463
         |solve_to_wand H1
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
464
         |apply _ ||
465
          let Q := match goal with |- Persistent ?Q => Q end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
466
          fail "iSpecialize:" Q "not persistent"
467
         |env_reflexivity
468
469
470
471
         |solve [iFrame "∗ #"]
         |go H1 pats]
    | SAutoFrame ?m :: ?pats =>
       eapply tac_specialize_frame with _ H1 _ _ _ _ _ _;
472
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H1 "not found"
473
474
475
476
477
         |solve_to_wand H1
         |lazymatch m with
          | GSpatial => apply elim_modal_dummy
          | GModal => apply _ || fail "iSpecialize: goal not a modality"
          end
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
478
479
         |iFrame "∗ #"; apply tac_unlock ||
          fail "iSpecialize: premise cannot be solved by framing"
480
         |reflexivity]; iIntro H1; go H1 pats
481
482
    end in let pats := spec_pat.parse pat in go H pats.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
483
(* The argument [p] denotes whether the conclusion of the specialized term is
484
485
486
persistent. If so, one can use all spatial hypotheses for both proving the
premises and the remaning goal. The argument [p] can either be a Boolean or an
introduction pattern, which will be coerced into [true] when it solely contains
487
488
489
490
491
`#` or `%` patterns at the top-level.

In case the specialization pattern in [t] states that the modality of the goal
should be kept for one of the premises (i.e. [>[H1 .. Hn]] is used) then [p]
defaults to [false] (i.e. spatial hypotheses are not preserved). *)
492
Tactic Notation "iSpecializeCore" open_constr(t) "as" constr(p) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
493
  let p := intro_pat_persistent p in
494
  let t :=
495
496
497
498
499
    match type of t with
    | string => constr:(ITrm (INamed t) hnil "")
    | ident => constr:(ITrm t hnil "")
    | _ => t
    end in
500
501
  lazymatch t with
  | ITrm ?H ?xs ?pat =>
502
    let pat := spec_pat.parse pat in
503
    let H := lazymatch type of H with string => constr:(INamed H) | _ => H end in
504
    lazymatch type of H with
505
    | ident =>
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
      (* The lemma [tac_specialize_persistent_helper] allows one to use all
      spatial hypotheses for both proving the premises of the lemma we
      specialize as well as those of the remaining goal. We can only use it when
      the result of the specialization is persistent, and no modality is
      eliminated. As an optimization, we do not use this when only universal
      quantifiers are instantiated. *)
      lazymatch eval compute in
        (bool_decide (pat  []) && p && negb (existsb spec_pat_modal pat)) with
514
515
      | true =>
         eapply tac_specialize_persistent_helper with _ H _ _ _;
516
           [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H "not found"
517
           |iSpecializeArgs H xs; iSpecializePat H pat; last (iExact H)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
518
           |apply _ ||
519
            let Q := match goal with |- Persistent ?Q => Q end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
520
            fail "iSpecialize:" Q "not persistent"
521
           |env_reflexivity|(* goal *)]
522
      | false => iSpecializeArgs H xs; iSpecializePat H pat
523
524
      end
    | _ => fail "iSpecialize:" H "should be a hypothesis, use iPoseProof instead"
525
    end
526
  | _ => fail "iSpecialize:" t "should be a proof mode term"
527
  end.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
528

529
Tactic Notation "iSpecialize" open_constr(t) :=
530
531
532
  iSpecializeCore t as false.
Tactic Notation "iSpecialize" open_constr(t) "as" "#" :=
  iSpecializeCore t as true.
533

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
534
(** * Pose proof *)
535
536
(* The tactic [iIntoValid] tactic solves a goal [uPred_valid Q]. The
arguments [t] is a Coq term whose type is of the following shape:
537

538
- [∀ (x_1 : A_1) .. (x_n : A_n), uPred_valid Q]
539
- [∀ (x_1 : A_1) .. (x_n : A_n), P1 ⊢ P2], in which case [Q] becomes [P1 -∗ P2]
540
541
542
543
- [∀ (x_1 : A_1) .. (x_n : A_n), P1 ⊣⊢ P2], in which case [Q] becomes [P1 ↔ P2]

The tactic instantiates each dependent argument [x_i] with an evar and generates
a goal [P] for non-dependent arguments [x_i : P]. *)
544
Tactic Notation "iIntoValid" open_constr(t) :=
545
  let rec go t :=
546
    let tT := type of t in
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
    lazymatch eval hnf in tT with
    | ?P  ?Q => let H := fresh in assert P as H; [|go uconstr:(t H); clear H]
    |  _ : ?T, _ =>
      (* Put [T] inside an [id] to avoid TC inference from being invoked. *)
      (* This is a workarround for Coq bug #4969. *)
      let e := fresh in evar (e:id T);
      let e' := eval unfold e in e in clear e; go (t e')
    | _ =>
555
556
      let tT' := eval cbv zeta in tT in apply (as_valid_1 tT');
        [apply _ || fail "iPoseProof: not a uPred"|exact t]
557
    end in
558
  go t.
559

560
561
562
563
564
565
566
(* The tactic [tac] is called with a temporary fresh name [H]. The argument
[lazy_tc] denotes whether type class inference on the premises of [lem] should
be performed before (if false) or after (if true) [tac H] is called. *)
Tactic Notation "iPoseProofCore" open_constr(lem)
    "as" constr(p) constr(lazy_tc) tactic(tac) :=
  try iStartProof;
  let Htmp := iFresh in
567
568
  let t := lazymatch lem with ITrm ?t ?xs ?pat => t | _ => lem end in
  let t := lazymatch type of t with string => constr:(INamed t) | _ => t end in
569
570
571
572
573
574
  let spec_tac _ :=
    lazymatch lem with
    | ITrm ?t ?xs ?pat => iSpecializeCore (ITrm Htmp xs pat) as p
    | _ => idtac
    end in
  let go goal_tac :=
575
    lazymatch type of t with
576
    | ident =>
577
       eapply tac_pose_proof_hyp with _ _ t _ Htmp _;
578
579
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iPoseProof:" t "not found"
         |env_reflexivity || fail "iPoseProof:" Htmp "not fresh"
580
         |goal_tac ()]
581
582
    | _ =>
       eapply tac_pose_proof with _ Htmp _; (* (j:=H) *)
583
         [iIntoValid t
584
         |env_reflexivity || fail "iPoseProof:" Htmp "not fresh"
585
         |goal_tac ()]
586
    end;
587
588
589
590
    try (apply _) in
  lazymatch eval compute in lazy_tc with
  | true => go ltac:(fun _ => spec_tac (); last (tac Htmp))
  | false => go spec_tac; last (tac Htmp)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
591
592
593
  end.

(** * Apply *)
594
Tactic Notation "iApplyHyp" constr(H) :=
595
596
  let rec go H := first
    [eapply tac_apply with _ H _ _ _;
597
      [env_reflexivity
598
599
      |apply _
      |lazy beta (* reduce betas created by instantiation *)]
600
    |iSpecializePat H "[]"; last go H] in
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
  iExact H ||
  go H ||
  lazymatch iTypeOf H with
  | Some (_,?Q) => fail "iApply: cannot apply" Q
  end.

Tactic Notation "iApply" open_constr(lem) :=
  iPoseProofCore lem as false true (fun H => iApplyHyp H).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
609
610

(** * Revert *)
611
Local Tactic Notation "iForallRevert" ident(x) :=
612
613
614
615
616
617
  let err x :=
    intros x;
    iMatchHyp (fun H P =>
      lazymatch P with
      | context [x] => fail 2 "iRevert:" x "is used in hypothesis" H
      end) in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
618
  iStartProof;
619
620
  let A := type of x in
  lazymatch type of A with
621
622
623
  | Prop => revert x; first [apply tac_pure_revert|err x]
  | _ => revert x; first [apply tac_forall_revert|err x]
  end.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
624
625

Tactic Notation "iRevert" constr(Hs) :=
626
627
  let rec go Hs :=
    lazymatch Hs with
628
    | [] => idtac
629
630
631
    | ESelPure :: ?Hs =>
       repeat match goal with x : _ |- _ => revert x end;
       go Hs
632
    | ESelIdent _ ?H :: ?Hs =>
633
       eapply tac_revert with _ H _ _; (* (i:=H2) *)
634
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iRevert:" H "not found"
635
         |env_cbv; go Hs]
636
    end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
637
  let Hs := iElaborateSelPat Hs in iStartProof; go Hs.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
638

639
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ")" :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
640
  iForallRevert x1.
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x2; iRevert ( x1 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x3; iRevert ( x1 x2 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x4; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x5; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ident(x6) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x6; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ident(x6) ident(x7) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x7; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ident(x6) ident(x7) ident(x8) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x8; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 ).

Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4) ")"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
667
    constr(Hs) :=
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ident(x6) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ident(x6) ident(x7) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ident(x6) ident(x7) ident(x8) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 x8 ).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
681
682
683

(** * Disjunction *)
Tactic Notation "iLeft" :=
684
  iStartProof;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
685
  eapply tac_or_l;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
686
687
688
689
    [apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- FromOr ?P _ _ => P end in
     fail "iLeft:" P "not a disjunction"
    |].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
690
Tactic Notation "iRight" :=
691
  iStartProof;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
692
  eapply tac_or_r;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
693
694
695
696
    [apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- FromOr ?P _ _ => P end in
     fail "iRight:" P "not a disjunction"
    |].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
697

698
Local Tactic Notation "iOrDestruct" constr(H) "as" constr(H1) constr(H2) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
699
  eapply tac_or_destruct with _ _ H _ H1 H2 _ _ _; (* (i:=H) (j1:=H1) (j2:=H2) *)
700
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iOrDestruct:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
701
702
703
    |apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- IntoOr ?P _ _ => P end in
     fail "iOrDestruct: cannot destruct" P
704
    |env_reflexivity || fail "iOrDestruct:" H1 "not fresh"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
705
706
    |env_reflexivity || fail "iOrDestruct:" H2 "not fresh"
    | |].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
707
708
709

(** * Conjunction and separating conjunction *)
Tactic Notation "iSplit" :=
710
  iStartProof;
711
712
713
714
  eapply tac_and_split;
    [apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- FromAnd _ ?P _ _ => P end in
     fail "iSplit:" P "not a conjunction"| |].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
715
716

Tactic Notation "iSplitL" constr(Hs) :=
717
  iStartProof;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
718
  let Hs := words Hs in
719
  let Hs := eval vm_compute in (INamed <$> Hs) in
720
  eapply tac_sep_split with _ _ Left Hs _ _; (* (js:=Hs) *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
721
    [apply _ ||
722
     let P := match goal with |- FromAnd _ ?P _ _ => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
723
     fail "iSplitL:" P "not a separating conjunction"
724
725
    |env_reflexivity ||
     let Hs := iMissingHyps Hs in
726
     fail "iSplitL: hypotheses" Hs "not found"
727
728
    | |].

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
729
Tactic Notation "iSplitR" constr(Hs) :=
730
  iStartProof;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
731
  let Hs := words Hs in
732
  let Hs := eval vm_compute in (INamed <$> Hs) in
733
  eapply tac_sep_split with _ _ Right Hs _ _; (* (js:=Hs) *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
734
    [apply _ ||
735
     let P := match goal with |- FromAnd _ ?P _ _ => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
736
     fail "iSplitR:" P "not a separating conjunction"
737
738
    |env_reflexivity ||
     let Hs := iMissingHyps Hs in
739
     fail "iSplitR: hypotheses" Hs "not found"
740
    | |].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
741
742
743
744

Tactic Notation "iSplitL" := iSplitR "".
Tactic Notation "iSplitR" := iSplitL "".

745
746
Local Tactic Notation "iAndDestruct" constr(H) "as" constr(H1) constr(H2) :=
  eapply tac_and_destruct with _ H _ H1 H2 _ _ _; (* (i:=H) (j1:=H1) (j2:=H2) *)
747
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iAndDestruct:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
748
749
750
    |apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- IntoAnd _ ?P _ _ => P end in
     fail "iAndDestruct: cannot destruct" P
751
    |env_reflexivity || fail "iAndDestruct:" H1 "or" H2 " not fresh"|].
752

753
754
Local Tactic Notation "iAndDestructChoice" constr(H) "as" constr(d) constr(H') :=
  eapply tac_and_destruct_choice with _ H _ d H' _ _ _;
755
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iAndDestructChoice:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
756
757
758
    |apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- IntoAnd _ ?P _ _ => P end in
     fail "iAndDestructChoice: cannot destruct" P
759
    |env_reflexivity || fail "iAndDestructChoice:" H' " not fresh"|].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
760

761
762
763
(** * Combinining hypotheses *)
Tactic Notation "iCombine" constr(Hs) "as" constr(H) :=
  let Hs := words Hs in
764
  let Hs := eval vm_compute in (INamed <$> Hs) in
765
  eapply tac_combine with _ _ Hs _ _ H _;
766
767
    [env_reflexivity ||
     let Hs := iMissingHyps Hs in
768
     fail "iCombine: hypotheses" Hs "not found"
769
    |apply _
770
    |env_reflexivity || fail "iCombine:" H "not fresh"|].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
771

772
773
774
Tactic Notation "iCombine" constr(H1) constr(H2) "as" constr(H) :=
  iCombine [H1;H2] as H.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
775
(** * Existential *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
776
Tactic Notation "iExists" uconstr(x1) :=
777
  iStartProof;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
778
  eapply tac_exist;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
779
780
781
    [apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- FromExist ?P _ => P end in
     fail "iExists:" P "not an existential"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
782
    |cbv beta; eexists x1].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
783

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
784
Tactic Notation "iExists" uconstr(x1) "," uconstr(x2) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
785
  iExists x1; iExists x2.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
786
Tactic Notation "iExists" uconstr(x1) "," uconstr(x2) "," uconstr(x3) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
787
  iExists x1; iExists x2, x3.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
788
789
Tactic Notation "iExists" uconstr(x1) "," uconstr(x2) "," uconstr(x3) ","
    uconstr(x4) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
790
  iExists x1; iExists x2, x3, x4.