tactics.v 77.7 KB
Newer Older
1
2
From iris.proofmode Require Import coq_tactics.
From iris.proofmode Require Import intro_patterns spec_patterns sel_patterns.
3
From iris.base_logic Require Export base_logic.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
4
From iris.proofmode Require Export classes notation.
5
From iris.proofmode Require Import class_instances.
Ralf Jung's avatar
Ralf Jung committed
6
From stdpp Require Import stringmap hlist.
7
From iris.proofmode Require Import strings.
8
Set Default Proof Using "Type".
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
9
10

Declare Reduction env_cbv := cbv [
11
  beq ascii_beq string_beq
12
13
  env_lookup env_lookup_delete env_delete env_app env_replace env_dom
  env_persistent env_spatial env_spatial_is_nil envs_dom
14
  envs_lookup envs_lookup_delete envs_delete envs_snoc envs_app
15
16
    envs_simple_replace envs_replace envs_split
    envs_clear_spatial envs_clear_persistent
17
    envs_split_go envs_split].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
18
19
Ltac env_cbv :=
  match goal with |- ?u => let v := eval env_cbv in u in change v end.
20
Ltac env_reflexivity := env_cbv; exact eq_refl.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
21

22
(** * Misc *)
23
24
(* Tactic Notation tactics cannot return terms *)
Ltac iFresh' H :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
25
26
  lazymatch goal with
  |- of_envs ?Δ  _ =>
27
28
29
     (* [vm_compute fails] if any of the hypotheses in [Δ] contain evars, so
     first use [cbv] to compute the domain of [Δ] *)
     let Hs := eval cbv in (envs_dom Δ) in
30
31
     eval vm_compute in (fresh_string_of_set H (of_list Hs))
  | _ => H
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
32
  end.
33
Ltac iFresh := iFresh' "~".
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
34

35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
Ltac iMissingHyps Hs :=
  let Δ :=
    lazymatch goal with
    | |- of_envs ?Δ  _ => Δ
    | |- context[ envs_split _ _ ?Δ ] => Δ
    end in
  let Hhyps := eval env_cbv in (envs_dom Δ) in
  eval vm_compute in (list_difference Hs Hhyps).

44
Ltac iTypeOf H :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
45
  let Δ := match goal with |- of_envs ?Δ  _ => Δ end in
46
  eval env_cbv in (envs_lookup H Δ).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
47

48
Tactic Notation "iMatchHyp" tactic1(tac) :=
49
50
51
52
  match goal with
  | |- context[ environments.Esnoc _ ?x ?P ] => tac x P
  end.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
Class AsValid {M} (φ : Prop) (P : uPred M) := as_entails : φ  P.
Arguments AsValid {_} _%type _%I.

Instance as_valid_valid {M} (P : uPred M) : AsValid (uPred_valid P) P | 0.
Proof. by rewrite /AsValid. Qed.

Instance as_valid_entails {M} (P Q : uPred M) : AsValid (P  Q) (P - Q) | 1.
Proof. split. apply uPred.entails_wand. apply uPred.wand_entails. Qed.

Instance as_valid_equiv {M} (P Q : uPred M) : AsValid (P  Q) (P  Q).
Proof. split. apply uPred.equiv_iff. apply uPred.iff_equiv. Qed.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
65
(** * Start a proof *)
66
Ltac iStartProof :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
67
  lazymatch goal with
68
  | |- of_envs _  _ => idtac
69
  | |- ?P =>
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
70
71
    apply (proj2 (_ : AsValid P _)), tac_adequate
    || fail "iStartProof: not a uPred"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
72
73
74
75
76
  end.

(** * Context manipulation *)
Tactic Notation "iRename" constr(H1) "into" constr(H2) :=
  eapply tac_rename with _ H1 H2 _ _; (* (i:=H1) (j:=H2) *)
77
78
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iRename:" H1 "not found"
    |env_reflexivity || fail "iRename:" H2 "not fresh"|].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
79

80
81
82
83
Local Inductive esel_pat :=
  | ESelPure
  | ESelName : bool  string  esel_pat.

84
Ltac iElaborateSelPat pat :=
85
86
  let rec go pat Δ Hs :=
    lazymatch pat with
87
    | [] => eval cbv in Hs
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
    | SelPure :: ?pat => go pat Δ (ESelPure :: Hs)
    | SelPersistent :: ?pat =>
       let Hs' := eval env_cbv in (env_dom (env_persistent Δ)) in
       let Δ' := eval env_cbv in (envs_clear_persistent Δ) in
       go pat Δ' ((ESelName true <$> Hs') ++ Hs)
    | SelSpatial :: ?pat =>
       let Hs' := eval env_cbv in (env_dom (env_spatial Δ)) in
       let Δ' := eval env_cbv in (envs_clear_spatial Δ) in
       go pat Δ' ((ESelName false <$> Hs') ++ Hs)
    | SelName ?H :: ?pat =>
       lazymatch eval env_cbv in (envs_lookup_delete H Δ) with
       | Some (?p,_,?Δ') => go pat Δ' (ESelName p H :: Hs)
       | None => fail "iElaborateSelPat:" H "not found"
       end
    end in
  lazymatch goal with
  | |- of_envs ?Δ  _ =>
    let pat := sel_pat.parse pat in go pat Δ (@nil esel_pat)
  end.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
108
109
Tactic Notation "iClear" constr(Hs) :=
  let rec go Hs :=
110
    lazymatch Hs with
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
111
    | [] => idtac
112
113
    | ESelPure :: ?Hs => clear; go Hs
    | ESelName _ ?H :: ?Hs =>
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
114
       eapply tac_clear with _ H _ _; (* (i:=H) *)
115
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iClear:" H "not found"|go Hs]
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
116
    end in
117
  let Hs := iElaborateSelPat Hs in go Hs.
118

119
120
Tactic Notation "iClear" "(" ident_list(xs) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iClear Hs; clear xs.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
121
122
123

(** * Assumptions *)
Tactic Notation "iExact" constr(H) :=
124
  eapply tac_assumption with H _ _; (* (i:=H) *)
125
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iExact:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
126
127
128
    |apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- FromAssumption _ ?P _ => P end in
     fail "iExact:" H ":" P "does not match goal"].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136

Tactic Notation "iAssumptionCore" :=
  let rec find Γ i P :=
    match Γ with
    | Esnoc ?Γ ?j ?Q => first [unify P Q; unify i j| find Γ i P]
    end in
  match goal with
  | |- envs_lookup ?i (Envs ?Γp ?Γs) = Some (_, ?P) =>
137
     first [is_evar i; fail 1 | env_reflexivity]
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
138
  | |- envs_lookup ?i (Envs ?Γp ?Γs) = Some (_, ?P) =>
139
     is_evar i; first [find Γp i P | find Γs i P]; env_reflexivity
140
  | |- envs_lookup_delete ?i (Envs ?Γp ?Γs) = Some (_, ?P, _) =>
141
     first [is_evar i; fail 1 | env_reflexivity]
142
  | |- envs_lookup_delete ?i (Envs ?Γp ?Γs) = Some (_, ?P, _) =>
143
     is_evar i; first [find Γp i P | find Γs i P]; env_reflexivity
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
144
  end.
145

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
146
Tactic Notation "iAssumption" :=
147
148
149
150
  let Hass := fresh in
  let rec find p Γ Q :=
    match Γ with
    | Esnoc ?Γ ?j ?P => first
151
       [pose proof (_ : FromAssumption p P Q) as Hass;
152
        apply (tac_assumption _ j p P); [env_reflexivity|apply Hass]
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
       |find p Γ Q]
    end in
  match goal with
  | |- of_envs (Envs ?Γp ?Γs)  ?Q =>
     first [find true Γp Q | find false Γs Q
           |fail "iAssumption:" Q "not found"]
  end.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
160
161
162
163
164

(** * False *)
Tactic Notation "iExFalso" := apply tac_ex_falso.

(** * Making hypotheses persistent or pure *)
165
Local Tactic Notation "iPersistent" constr(H) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
166
  eapply tac_persistent with _ H _ _ _; (* (i:=H) *)
167
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iPersistent:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
168
    |apply _ ||
169
     let Q := match goal with |- IntoPersistent _ ?Q _ => Q end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
170
     fail "iPersistent:" Q "not persistent"
171
    |env_reflexivity|].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
172

173
Local Tactic Notation "iPure" constr(H) "as" simple_intropattern(pat) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
174
  eapply tac_pure with _ H _ _ _; (* (i:=H1) *)
175
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iPure:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
176
177
178
    |apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- IntoPure ?P _ => P end in
     fail "iPure:" P "not pure"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
179
180
    |intros pat].

181
Tactic Notation "iPureIntro" :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
182
  iStartProof;
183
  eapply tac_pure_intro;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
184
185
186
187
    [apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- FromPure ?P _ => P end in
     fail "iPureIntro:" P "not pure"
    |].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
188

189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
(** Framing *)
Local Ltac iFrameFinish :=
  lazy iota beta;
  try match goal with
  | |- _  True => exact (uPred.pure_intro _ _ I)
  end.

Local Ltac iFramePure t :=
  let φ := type of t in
  eapply (tac_frame_pure _ _ _ _ t);
    [apply _ || fail "iFrame: cannot frame" φ
    |iFrameFinish].

Local Ltac iFrameHyp H :=
  eapply tac_frame with _ H _ _ _;
204
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iFrame:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
205
206
207
    |apply _ ||
     let R := match goal with |- Frame _ ?R _ _ => R end in
     fail "iFrame: cannot frame" R
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
    |iFrameFinish].

Local Ltac iFrameAnyPure :=
  repeat match goal with H : _ |- _ => iFramePure H end.

Local Ltac iFrameAnyPersistent :=
  let rec go Hs :=
    match Hs with [] => idtac | ?H :: ?Hs => repeat iFrameHyp H; go Hs end in
  match goal with
  | |- of_envs ?Δ  _ =>
     let Hs := eval cbv in (env_dom (env_persistent Δ)) in go Hs
  end.

Local Ltac iFrameAnySpatial :=
  let rec go Hs :=
    match Hs with [] => idtac | ?H :: ?Hs => try iFrameHyp H; go Hs end in
  match goal with
  | |- of_envs ?Δ  _ =>
     let Hs := eval cbv in (env_dom (env_spatial Δ)) in go Hs
  end.

Tactic Notation "iFrame" := iFrameAnySpatial.

Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 ).
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 ).
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 ).
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 ).
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) constr(t6) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 ).
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) constr(t6) constr(t7) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 t7 ).
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) constr(t6) constr(t7) constr(t8)")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 t7 t8 ).

Tactic Notation "iFrame" constr(Hs) :=
  let rec go Hs :=
254
    lazymatch Hs with
255
    | [] => idtac
256
257
258
259
    | SelPure :: ?Hs => iFrameAnyPure; go Hs
    | SelPersistent :: ?Hs => iFrameAnyPersistent; go Hs
    | SelSpatial :: ?Hs => iFrameAnySpatial; go Hs
    | SelName ?H :: ?Hs => iFrameHyp H; go Hs
260
    end
261
  in let Hs := sel_pat.parse Hs in go Hs.
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 ) Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 ) Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4) ")"
    constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 ) Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 ) Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) constr(t6) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 ) Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) constr(t6) constr(t7) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 t7 ) Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) constr(t6) constr(t7) constr(t8)")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 t7 t8 ) Hs.

284
285
286
(** * Basic introduction tactics *)
Local Tactic Notation "iIntro" "(" simple_intropattern(x) ")" :=
  try iStartProof;
287
288
289
  lazymatch goal with
  | |- _  _ =>
    eapply tac_forall_intro;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
290
      [apply _ ||
291
292
293
294
295
       let P := match goal with |- FromForall ?P _ => P end in
       fail "iIntro: cannot turn" P "into a universal quantifier"
      |lazy beta; intros x]
  | |- _ => intros x
  end.
296
297
298
299
300
301

Local Tactic Notation "iIntro" constr(H) :=
  iStartProof;
  first
  [ (* (?Q → _) *)
    eapply tac_impl_intro with _ H; (* (i:=H) *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
302
      [env_cbv; apply _ ||
303
       let P := lazymatch goal with |- Persistent ?P => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
304
305
       fail 1 "iIntro: introducing non-persistent" H ":" P
              "into non-empty spatial context"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
306
307
      |env_reflexivity || fail "iIntro:" H "not fresh"
      |]
308
309
  | (* (_ -∗ _) *)
    eapply tac_wand_intro with _ H; (* (i:=H) *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
310
311
      [env_reflexivity || fail 1 "iIntro:" H "not fresh"
      |]
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
  | fail 1 "iIntro: nothing to introduce" ].

Local Tactic Notation "iIntro" "#" constr(H) :=
  iStartProof;
  first
  [ (* (?P → _) *)
    eapply tac_impl_intro_persistent with _ H _; (* (i:=H) *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
319
      [apply _ || 
320
       let P := match goal with |- IntoPersistent _ ?P _ => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
321
322
323
       fail 1 "iIntro: " P " not persistent"
      |env_reflexivity || fail 1 "iIntro:" H "not fresh"
      |]
324
325
  | (* (?P -∗ _) *)
    eapply tac_wand_intro_persistent with _ H _; (* (i:=H) *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
326
      [apply _ || 
327
       let P := match goal with |- IntoPersistent _ ?P _ => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
328
329
330
       fail 1 "iIntro: " P " not persistent"
      |env_reflexivity || fail 1 "iIntro:" H "not fresh"
      |]
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
  | fail 1 "iIntro: nothing to introduce" ].

Local Tactic Notation "iIntro" "_" :=
  try iStartProof;
  first
  [ (* (?Q → _) *) apply tac_impl_intro_drop
  | (* (_ -∗ _) *) apply tac_wand_intro_drop
  | (* (∀ _, _) *) iIntro (_)
  | fail 1 "iIntro: nothing to introduce" ].

Local Tactic Notation "iIntroForall" :=
  try iStartProof;
  lazymatch goal with
  | |-  _, ?P => fail
  | |-  _, _ => intro
  | |- _  ( x : _, _) => let x' := fresh x in iIntro (x')
  end.
Local Tactic Notation "iIntro" :=
  try iStartProof;
  lazymatch goal with
  | |- _  ?P => intro
  | |- _  (_ - _) => iIntro (?) || let H := iFresh in iIntro #H || iIntro H
  | |- _  (_  _) => iIntro (?) || let H := iFresh in iIntro #H || iIntro H
  end.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
356
(** * Specialize *)
357
358
359
360
361
Record iTrm {X As} :=
  ITrm { itrm : X ; itrm_vars : hlist As ; itrm_hyps : string }.
Arguments ITrm {_ _} _ _ _.

Notation "( H $! x1 .. xn )" :=
362
  (ITrm H (hcons x1 .. (hcons xn hnil) ..) "") (at level 0, x1, xn at level 9).
363
Notation "( H $! x1 .. xn 'with' pat )" :=
364
  (ITrm H (hcons x1 .. (hcons xn hnil) ..) pat) (at level 0, x1, xn at level 9).
365
366
Notation "( H 'with' pat )" := (ITrm H hnil pat) (at level 0).

367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
(*
There is some hacky stuff going on here (most probably there is a Coq bug).
Holes -- like unresolved type class instances -- in the argument `xs` are
resolved at arbitrary moments. It seems that tactics like `apply`, `split` and
`eexists` trigger type class search to resolve these holes. To avoid TC being
triggered too eagerly, this tactic uses `refine` at various places instead of
`apply`.

TODO: Investigate what really is going on. Is there a related to Cog bug #5752?
When should holes in an `open_constr` be resolved?
*)
378
Local Tactic Notation "iSpecializeArgs" constr(H) open_constr(xs) :=
379
  let rec go xs :=
380
    lazymatch xs with
381
    | hnil => apply id (* Finally, trigger TC *)
382
    | hcons ?x ?xs =>
383
       eapply tac_forall_specialize with _ H _ _ _; (* (i:=H) (a:=x) *)
384
385
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H "not found"
         |typeclasses eauto ||
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
386
          let P := match goal with |- IntoForall ?P _ => P end in
387
388
389
390
          fail "iSpecialize: cannot instantiate" P "with" x
         |lazymatch goal with (* Force [A] in [ex_intro] to deal with coercions. *)
          | |-  _ : ?A, _ => refine (@ex_intro A _ x (conj _ _))
          end; [env_reflexivity|go xs]]
391
392
    end in
  go xs.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
393

394
Local Tactic Notation "iSpecializePat" open_constr(H) constr(pat) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
395
  let solve_to_wand H1 :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
396
    apply _ ||
397
    let P := match goal with |- IntoWand _ ?P _ _ => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
398
    fail "iSpecialize:" P "not an implication/wand" in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
399
400
401
  let rec go H1 pats :=
    lazymatch pats with
    | [] => idtac
402
403
404
    | SForall :: ?pats =>
       idtac "the * specialization pattern is deprecated because it is applied implicitly";
       go H1 pats
405
    | SName ?H2 :: ?pats =>
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
406
       eapply tac_specialize with _ _ H2 _ H1 _ _ _ _; (* (j:=H1) (i:=H2) *)
407
408
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H2 "not found"
         |env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H1 "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
409
         |apply _ ||
410
411
          let P := match goal with |- IntoWand _ ?P ?Q _ => P end in
          let Q := match goal with |- IntoWand _ ?P ?Q _ => Q end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
412
          fail "iSpecialize: cannot instantiate" P "with" Q
413
         |env_reflexivity|go H1 pats]
414
415
    | SPureGoal ?d :: ?pats =>
       eapply tac_specialize_assert_pure with _ H1 _ _ _ _ _;
416
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H1 "not found"
417
         |solve_to_wand H1
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
418
419
420
         |apply _ ||
          let Q := match goal with |- FromPure ?Q _ => Q end in
          fail "iSpecialize:" Q "not pure"
421
         |env_reflexivity
422
         |done_if d (*goal*)
423
         |go H1 pats]
424
425
    | SGoal (SpecGoal GPersistent false ?Hs_frame [] ?d) :: ?pats =>
       eapply tac_specialize_assert_persistent with _ _ H1 _ _ _ _;
426
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H1 "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
427
         |solve_to_wand H1
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
428
         |apply _ ||
429
          let Q := match goal with |- Persistent ?Q => Q end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
430
          fail "iSpecialize:" Q "not persistent"
431
         |env_reflexivity
432
         |iFrame Hs_frame; done_if d (*goal*)
433
         |go H1 pats]
434
435
436
    | SGoal (SpecGoal GPersistent _ _ _ _) :: ?pats =>
       fail "iSpecialize: cannot select hypotheses for persistent premise"
    | SGoal (SpecGoal ?m ?lr ?Hs_frame ?Hs ?d) :: ?pats =>
437
       let Hs' := eval cbv in (if lr then Hs else Hs_frame ++ Hs) in
438
       eapply tac_specialize_assert with _ _ _ H1 _ lr Hs' _ _ _ _;
439
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H1 "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
440
         |solve_to_wand H1
441
442
443
         |lazymatch m with
          | GSpatial => apply elim_modal_dummy
          | GModal => apply _ || fail "iSpecialize: goal not a modality"
444
          end
445
446
         |env_reflexivity ||
          let Hs' := iMissingHyps Hs' in
447
          fail "iSpecialize: hypotheses" Hs' "not found"
448
         |iFrame Hs_frame; done_if d (*goal*)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
449
         |go H1 pats]
450
451
    | SAutoFrame GPersistent :: ?pats =>
       eapply tac_specialize_assert_persistent with _ _ H1 _ _ _ _;
452
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H1 "not found"
453
         |solve_to_wand H1
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
454
         |apply _ ||
455
          let Q := match goal with |- Persistent ?Q => Q end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
456
          fail "iSpecialize:" Q "not persistent"
457
         |env_reflexivity
458
459
460
461
         |solve [iFrame "∗ #"]
         |go H1 pats]
    | SAutoFrame ?m :: ?pats =>
       eapply tac_specialize_frame with _ H1 _ _ _ _ _ _;
462
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H1 "not found"
463
464
465
466
467
         |solve_to_wand H1
         |lazymatch m with
          | GSpatial => apply elim_modal_dummy
          | GModal => apply _ || fail "iSpecialize: goal not a modality"
          end
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
468
469
         |iFrame "∗ #"; apply tac_unlock ||
          fail "iSpecialize: premise cannot be solved by framing"
470
         |reflexivity]; iIntro H1; go H1 pats
471
472
    end in let pats := spec_pat.parse pat in go H pats.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
473
(* The argument [p] denotes whether the conclusion of the specialized term is
474
475
476
persistent. If so, one can use all spatial hypotheses for both proving the
premises and the remaning goal. The argument [p] can either be a Boolean or an
introduction pattern, which will be coerced into [true] when it solely contains
477
478
479
480
481
`#` or `%` patterns at the top-level.

In case the specialization pattern in [t] states that the modality of the goal
should be kept for one of the premises (i.e. [>[H1 .. Hn]] is used) then [p]
defaults to [false] (i.e. spatial hypotheses are not preserved). *)
482
Tactic Notation "iSpecializeCore" open_constr(t) "as" constr(p) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
483
  let p := intro_pat_persistent p in
484
485
  let t :=
    match type of t with string => constr:(ITrm t hnil "") | _ => t end in
486
487
  lazymatch t with
  | ITrm ?H ?xs ?pat =>
488
    let pat := spec_pat.parse pat in
489
490
    lazymatch type of H with
    | string =>
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
      (* The lemma [tac_specialize_persistent_helper] allows one to use all
      spatial hypotheses for both proving the premises of the lemma we
      specialize as well as those of the remaining goal. We can only use it when
      the result of the specialization is persistent, and no modality is
      eliminated. As an optimization, we do not use this when only universal
      quantifiers are instantiated. *)
      lazymatch eval compute in
        (bool_decide (pat  []) && p && negb (existsb spec_pat_modal pat)) with
499
500
      | true =>
         eapply tac_specialize_persistent_helper with _ H _ _ _;
501
           [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H "not found"
502
           |iSpecializeArgs H xs; iSpecializePat H pat; last (iExact H)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
503
           |apply _ ||
504
            let Q := match goal with |- Persistent ?Q => Q end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
505
            fail "iSpecialize:" Q "not persistent"
506
           |env_reflexivity|(* goal *)]
507
      | false => iSpecializeArgs H xs; iSpecializePat H pat
508
509
      end
    | _ => fail "iSpecialize:" H "should be a hypothesis, use iPoseProof instead"
510
    end
511
  | _ => fail "iSpecialize:" t "should be a proof mode term"
512
  end.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
513

514
Tactic Notation "iSpecialize" open_constr(t) :=
515
516
517
  iSpecializeCore t as false.
Tactic Notation "iSpecialize" open_constr(t) "as" "#" :=
  iSpecializeCore t as true.
518

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
519
(** * Pose proof *)
520
521
(* The tactic [iIntoValid] tactic solves a goal [uPred_valid Q]. The
arguments [t] is a Coq term whose type is of the following shape:
522

523
- [∀ (x_1 : A_1) .. (x_n : A_n), uPred_valid Q]
524
- [∀ (x_1 : A_1) .. (x_n : A_n), P1 ⊢ P2], in which case [Q] becomes [P1 -∗ P2]
525
526
527
528
- [∀ (x_1 : A_1) .. (x_n : A_n), P1 ⊣⊢ P2], in which case [Q] becomes [P1 ↔ P2]

The tactic instantiates each dependent argument [x_i] with an evar and generates
a goal [P] for non-dependent arguments [x_i : P]. *)
529
Tactic Notation "iIntoValid" open_constr(t) :=
530
  let rec go t :=
531
    let tT := type of t in
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
    lazymatch eval hnf in tT with
    | ?P  ?Q => let H := fresh in assert P as H; [|go uconstr:(t H); clear H]
    |  _ : ?T, _ =>
      (* Put [T] inside an [id] to avoid TC inference from being invoked. *)
      (* This is a workarround for Coq bug #4969. *)
      let e := fresh in evar (e:id T);
      let e' := eval unfold e in e in clear e; go (t e')
    | _ =>
      let tT' := eval cbv zeta in tT in apply (proj1 (_ : AsValid tT' _) t)
      || fail "iPoseProof: not a uPred"
    end in
543
  go t.
544

545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
(* The tactic [tac] is called with a temporary fresh name [H]. The argument
[lazy_tc] denotes whether type class inference on the premises of [lem] should
be performed before (if false) or after (if true) [tac H] is called. *)
Tactic Notation "iPoseProofCore" open_constr(lem)
    "as" constr(p) constr(lazy_tc) tactic(tac) :=
  try iStartProof;
  let Htmp := iFresh in
  let t :=
    lazymatch lem with ITrm ?t ?xs ?pat => t | _ => lem end in
  let spec_tac _ :=
    lazymatch lem with
    | ITrm ?t ?xs ?pat => iSpecializeCore (ITrm Htmp xs pat) as p
    | _ => idtac
    end in
  let go goal_tac :=
560
561
562
    lazymatch type of t with
    | string =>
       eapply tac_pose_proof_hyp with _ _ t _ Htmp _;
563
564
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iPoseProof:" t "not found"
         |env_reflexivity || fail "iPoseProof:" Htmp "not fresh"
565
         |goal_tac ()]
566
567
    | _ =>
       eapply tac_pose_proof with _ Htmp _; (* (j:=H) *)
568
         [iIntoValid t
569
         |env_reflexivity || fail "iPoseProof:" Htmp "not fresh"
570
         |goal_tac ()]
571
    end;
572
573
574
575
    try (apply _) in
  lazymatch eval compute in lazy_tc with
  | true => go ltac:(fun _ => spec_tac (); last (tac Htmp))
  | false => go spec_tac; last (tac Htmp)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
576
577
578
  end.

(** * Apply *)
579
Tactic Notation "iApplyHyp" constr(H) :=
580
581
  let rec go H := first
    [eapply tac_apply with _ H _ _ _;
582
      [env_reflexivity
583
584
      |apply _
      |lazy beta (* reduce betas created by instantiation *)]
585
    |iSpecializePat H "[]"; last go H] in
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
  iExact H ||
  go H ||
  lazymatch iTypeOf H with
  | Some (_,?Q) => fail "iApply: cannot apply" Q
  end.

Tactic Notation "iApply" open_constr(lem) :=
  iPoseProofCore lem as false true (fun H => iApplyHyp H).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
594
595

(** * Revert *)
596
Local Tactic Notation "iForallRevert" ident(x) :=
597
598
599
600
601
602
  let err x :=
    intros x;
    iMatchHyp (fun H P =>
      lazymatch P with
      | context [x] => fail 2 "iRevert:" x "is used in hypothesis" H
      end) in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
603
  iStartProof;
604
605
  let A := type of x in
  lazymatch type of A with
606
607
608
  | Prop => revert x; first [apply tac_pure_revert|err x]
  | _ => revert x; first [apply tac_forall_revert|err x]
  end.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
609
610

Tactic Notation "iRevert" constr(Hs) :=
611
612
  let rec go Hs :=
    lazymatch Hs with
613
    | [] => idtac
614
615
616
617
618
    | ESelPure :: ?Hs =>
       repeat match goal with x : _ |- _ => revert x end;
       go Hs
    | ESelName _ ?H :: ?Hs =>
       eapply tac_revert with _ H _ _; (* (i:=H2) *)
619
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iRevert:" H "not found"
620
         |env_cbv; go Hs]
621
    end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
622
  let Hs := iElaborateSelPat Hs in iStartProof; go Hs.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
623

624
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ")" :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
625
  iForallRevert x1.
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x2; iRevert ( x1 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x3; iRevert ( x1 x2 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x4; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x5; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ident(x6) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x6; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ident(x6) ident(x7) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x7; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ident(x6) ident(x7) ident(x8) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x8; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 ).

Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4) ")"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
652
    constr(Hs) :=
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ident(x6) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ident(x6) ident(x7) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ident(x6) ident(x7) ident(x8) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 x8 ).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
666
667
668

(** * Disjunction *)
Tactic Notation "iLeft" :=
669
  iStartProof;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
670
  eapply tac_or_l;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
671
672
673
674
    [apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- FromOr ?P _ _ => P end in
     fail "iLeft:" P "not a disjunction"
    |].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
675
Tactic Notation "iRight" :=
676
  iStartProof;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
677
  eapply tac_or_r;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
678
679
680
681
    [apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- FromOr ?P _ _ => P end in
     fail "iRight:" P "not a disjunction"
    |].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
682

683
Local Tactic Notation "iOrDestruct" constr(H) "as" constr(H1) constr(H2) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
684
  eapply tac_or_destruct with _ _ H _ H1 H2 _ _ _; (* (i:=H) (j1:=H1) (j2:=H2) *)
685
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iOrDestruct:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
686
687
688
    |apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- IntoOr ?P _ _ => P end in
     fail "iOrDestruct: cannot destruct" P
689
    |env_reflexivity || fail "iOrDestruct:" H1 "not fresh"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
690
691
    |env_reflexivity || fail "iOrDestruct:" H2 "not fresh"
    | |].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
692
693
694

(** * Conjunction and separating conjunction *)
Tactic Notation "iSplit" :=
695
  iStartProof;
696
697
698
  lazymatch goal with
  | |- _  _ =>
    eapply tac_and_split;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
699
      [apply _ ||
700
       let P := match goal with |- FromAnd _ ?P _ _ => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
701
       fail "iSplit:" P "not a conjunction"| |]
702
  end.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
703
704

Tactic Notation "iSplitL" constr(Hs) :=
705
  iStartProof;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
706
707
  let Hs := words Hs in
  eapply tac_sep_split with _ _ false Hs _ _; (* (js:=Hs) *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
708
    [apply _ ||
709
     let P := match goal with |- FromAnd _ ?P _ _ => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
710
     fail "iSplitL:" P "not a separating conjunction"
711
712
    |env_reflexivity ||
     let Hs := iMissingHyps Hs in
713
     fail "iSplitL: hypotheses" Hs "not found"
714
715
    | |].

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
716
Tactic Notation "iSplitR" constr(Hs) :=
717
  iStartProof;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
718
719
  let Hs := words Hs in
  eapply tac_sep_split with _ _ true Hs _ _; (* (js:=Hs) *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
720
    [apply _ ||
721
     let P := match goal with |- FromAnd _ ?P _ _ => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
722
     fail "iSplitR:" P "not a separating conjunction"
723
724
    |env_reflexivity ||
     let Hs := iMissingHyps Hs in
725
     fail "iSplitR: hypotheses" Hs "not found"
726
    | |].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
727
728
729
730

Tactic Notation "iSplitL" := iSplitR "".
Tactic Notation "iSplitR" := iSplitL "".

731
732
Local Tactic Notation "iAndDestruct" constr(H) "as" constr(H1) constr(H2) :=
  eapply tac_and_destruct with _ H _ H1 H2 _ _ _; (* (i:=H) (j1:=H1) (j2:=H2) *)
733
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iAndDestruct:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
734
735
736
    |apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- IntoAnd _ ?P _ _ => P end in
     fail "iAndDestruct: cannot destruct" P
737
    |env_reflexivity || fail "iAndDestruct:" H1 "or" H2 " not fresh"|].
738
739
740

Local Tactic Notation "iAndDestructChoice" constr(H) "as" constr(lr) constr(H') :=
  eapply tac_and_destruct_choice with _ H _ lr H' _ _ _;
741
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iAndDestructChoice:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
742
743
744
    |apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- IntoAnd _ ?P _ _ => P end in
     fail "iAndDestructChoice: cannot destruct" P
745
    |env_reflexivity || fail "iAndDestructChoice:" H' " not fresh"|].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
746

747
748
749
750
(** * Combinining hypotheses *)
Tactic Notation "iCombine" constr(Hs) "as" constr(H) :=
  let Hs := words Hs in
  eapply tac_combine with _ _ Hs _ _ H _;
751
752
    [env_reflexivity ||
     let Hs := iMissingHyps Hs in
753
     fail "iCombine: hypotheses" Hs "not found"
754
    |apply _
755
    |env_reflexivity || fail "iCombine:" H "not fresh"|].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
756

757
758
759
Tactic Notation "iCombine" constr(H1) constr(H2) "as" constr(H) :=
  iCombine [H1;H2] as H.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
760
(** * Existential *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
761
Tactic Notation "iExists" uconstr(x1) :=
762
  iStartProof;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
763
  eapply tac_exist;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
764
765
766
    [apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- FromExist ?P _ => P end in
     fail "iExists:" P "not an existential"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
767
    |cbv beta; eexists x1].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
768

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
769
Tactic Notation "iExists" uconstr(x1) "," uconstr(x2) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
770
  iExists x1; iExists x2.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
771
Tactic Notation "iExists" uconstr(x1) "," uconstr(x2) "," uconstr(x3) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
772
  iExists x1; iExists x2, x3.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
773
774
Tactic Notation "iExists" uconstr(x1) "," uconstr(x2) "," uconstr(x3) ","
    uconstr(x4) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
775
  iExists x1; iExists x2, x3, x4.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
776
777
Tactic Notation "iExists" uconstr(x1) "," uconstr(x2) "," uconstr(x3) ","
    uconstr(x4) "," uconstr(x5) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
778
  iExists x1; iExists x2, x3, x4, x5.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
779
780
Tactic Notation "iExists" uconstr(x1) "," uconstr(x2) "," uconstr(x3) ","
    uconstr(x4) "," uconstr(x5) "," uconstr(x6) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
781
  iExists x1; iExists x2, x3, x4, x5, x6.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
782
783
Tactic Notation "iExists" uconstr(x1) "," uconstr(x2) "," uconstr(x3) ","
    uconstr(x4) "," uconstr(x5) "," uconstr(x6) "," uconstr(x7) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
784
  iExists x1; iExists x2, x3, x4, x5, x6, x7.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
785
786
787
Tactic Notation "iExists" uconstr(x1) "," uconstr(x2) "," uconstr(x3) ","
    uconstr(x4) "," uconstr(x5) "," uconstr(x6) "," uconstr(x7) ","
    uconstr(x8) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
788
789
  iExists x1; iExists x2, x3, x4, x5, x6, x7, x8.

790
791
Local Tactic Notation "iExistDestruct" constr(H)
    "as" simple_intropattern(x) constr(Hx) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
792
  eapply tac_exist_destruct with H _ Hx _ _; (* (i:=H) (j:=Hx) *)
793
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iExistDestruct:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
794
795
796
    |apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- IntoExist ?P _ => P end in
     fail "iExistDestruct: cannot destruct" P|];
797
798
  let y := fresh in
  intros y; eexists; split;
799
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iExistDestruct:" Hx "not fresh"
800
    |revert y; intros x].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
801

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
802
803
(** * Always *)
Tactic Notation "iAlways":=
804
  iStartProof;
805
806
  apply tac_persistently_intro; env_cbv
    || fail "iAlways: the goal is not an persistently modality".
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
807
808

(** * Later *)
809
Tactic Notation "iNext" open_constr(n) :=
810
  iStartProof;
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
  let P := match goal with |- _  ?P => P end in
  try lazymatch n with 0 => fail 1 "iNext: cannot strip 0 laters" end;
  eapply (tac_next _ _ n);
    [apply _ || fail "iNext:" P "does not contain" n "laters"
    |lazymatch goal with
     | |- IntoLaterNEnvs 0 _ _ => fail "iNext:" P "does not contain laters"
     | _ => apply _
818
819
     end
    |lazy beta (* remove beta redexes caused by removing laters under binders*)].
820
821

Tactic Notation "iNext":= iNext _.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
822

823
(** * Update modality *)
824
Tactic Notation "iModIntro" :=
825
  iStartProof;
826
  eapply tac_modal_intro;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
827
828
829
    [apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- FromModal ?P _ => P end in
     fail "iModIntro:" P "not a modality"|].
830
831
832

Tactic Notation "iModCore" constr(H) :=
  eapply tac_modal_elim with _ H _