tactics.v 79.2 KB
Newer Older
1
2
From iris.proofmode Require Import coq_tactics.
From iris.proofmode Require Import intro_patterns spec_patterns sel_patterns.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
3
From iris.bi Require Export bi.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
4
From iris.proofmode Require Export classes notation.
5
From iris.proofmode Require Import class_instances.
Ralf Jung's avatar
Ralf Jung committed
6
From stdpp Require Import stringmap hlist.
7
From iris.proofmode Require Import strings.
8
Set Default Proof Using "Type".
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
9
10

Declare Reduction env_cbv := cbv [
11
  beq ascii_beq string_beq
12
13
  env_lookup env_lookup_delete env_delete env_app env_replace env_dom
  env_persistent env_spatial env_spatial_is_nil envs_dom
14
  envs_lookup envs_lookup_delete envs_delete envs_snoc envs_app
15
16
    envs_simple_replace envs_replace envs_split
    envs_clear_spatial envs_clear_persistent
17
    envs_split_go envs_split].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
18
19
Ltac env_cbv :=
  match goal with |- ?u => let v := eval env_cbv in u in change v end.
20
Ltac env_reflexivity := env_cbv; exact eq_refl.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
21

22
(** * Misc *)
23
24
(* Tactic Notation tactics cannot return terms *)
Ltac iFresh' H :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
25
26
  lazymatch goal with
  |- of_envs ?Δ  _ =>
27
28
29
     (* [vm_compute fails] if any of the hypotheses in [Δ] contain evars, so
     first use [cbv] to compute the domain of [Δ] *)
     let Hs := eval cbv in (envs_dom Δ) in
30
31
     eval vm_compute in (fresh_string_of_set H (of_list Hs))
  | _ => H
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
32
  end.
33
Ltac iFresh := iFresh' "~".
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
34

35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
Ltac iMissingHyps Hs :=
  let Δ :=
    lazymatch goal with
    | |- of_envs ?Δ  _ => Δ
    | |- context[ envs_split _ _ ?Δ ] => Δ
    end in
  let Hhyps := eval env_cbv in (envs_dom Δ) in
  eval vm_compute in (list_difference Hs Hhyps).

44
Ltac iTypeOf H :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
45
  let Δ := match goal with |- of_envs ?Δ  _ => Δ end in
46
  eval env_cbv in (envs_lookup H Δ).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
47

48
Tactic Notation "iMatchHyp" tactic1(tac) :=
49
50
51
52
  match goal with
  | |- context[ environments.Esnoc _ ?x ?P ] => tac x P
  end.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
53
Class AsValid {PROP : bi} (φ : Prop) (P : PROP) := as_entails : φ  P.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
54
55
Arguments AsValid {_} _%type _%I.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
56
Instance as_valid_valid {PROP : bi} (P : PROP) : AsValid (bi_valid P) P | 0.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
57
58
Proof. by rewrite /AsValid. Qed.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
59
60
Instance as_valid_entails {PROP : bi} (P Q : PROP) : AsValid (P  Q) (P - Q) | 1.
Proof. split. apply bi.entails_wand. apply bi.wand_entails. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
61

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
62
63
Instance as_valid_equiv {PROP : bi} (P Q : PROP) : AsValid (P  Q) (P - Q).
Proof. split. apply bi.equiv_wand_iff. apply bi.wand_iff_equiv. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
64

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
65
(** * Start a proof *)
66
Ltac iStartProof :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
67
  lazymatch goal with
68
  | |- of_envs _  _ => idtac
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
69
  | |- let _ := _ in _ => fail
70
  | |- ?P =>
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
71
    apply (proj2 (_ : AsValid P _)), tac_adequate
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
72
    || fail "iStartProof: not a BI entailment"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
73
74
75
76
77
  end.

(** * Context manipulation *)
Tactic Notation "iRename" constr(H1) "into" constr(H2) :=
  eapply tac_rename with _ H1 H2 _ _; (* (i:=H1) (j:=H2) *)
78
79
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iRename:" H1 "not found"
    |env_reflexivity || fail "iRename:" H2 "not fresh"|].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
80

81
82
83
84
Local Inductive esel_pat :=
  | ESelPure
  | ESelName : bool  string  esel_pat.

85
Ltac iElaborateSelPat pat :=
86
87
  let rec go pat Δ Hs :=
    lazymatch pat with
88
    | [] => eval cbv in Hs
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
    | SelPure :: ?pat => go pat Δ (ESelPure :: Hs)
    | SelPersistent :: ?pat =>
       let Hs' := eval env_cbv in (env_dom (env_persistent Δ)) in
       let Δ' := eval env_cbv in (envs_clear_persistent Δ) in
       go pat Δ' ((ESelName true <$> Hs') ++ Hs)
    | SelSpatial :: ?pat =>
       let Hs' := eval env_cbv in (env_dom (env_spatial Δ)) in
       let Δ' := eval env_cbv in (envs_clear_spatial Δ) in
       go pat Δ' ((ESelName false <$> Hs') ++ Hs)
    | SelName ?H :: ?pat =>
       lazymatch eval env_cbv in (envs_lookup_delete H Δ) with
       | Some (?p,_,?Δ') => go pat Δ' (ESelName p H :: Hs)
       | None => fail "iElaborateSelPat:" H "not found"
       end
    end in
  lazymatch goal with
  | |- of_envs ?Δ  _ =>
    let pat := sel_pat.parse pat in go pat Δ (@nil esel_pat)
  end.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
109
110
Tactic Notation "iClear" constr(Hs) :=
  let rec go Hs :=
111
    lazymatch Hs with
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
112
    | [] => idtac
113
114
    | ESelPure :: ?Hs => clear; go Hs
    | ESelName _ ?H :: ?Hs =>
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
115
       eapply tac_clear with _ H _ _; (* (i:=H) *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
116
117
118
119
120
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iClear:" H "not found"
         |env_cbv; apply _ ||
          let P := match goal with |- TCOr (Affine ?P) _ => P end in
          fail "iClear:" H ":" P "not affine and the goal not absorbing"
         |go Hs]
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
121
    end in
122
  let Hs := iElaborateSelPat Hs in go Hs.
123

124
125
Tactic Notation "iClear" "(" ident_list(xs) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iClear Hs; clear xs.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
126
127
128

(** * Assumptions *)
Tactic Notation "iExact" constr(H) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
129
  eapply tac_assumption with _ H _ _; (* (i:=H) *)
130
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iExact:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
131
132
    |apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- FromAssumption _ ?P _ => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
133
134
135
     fail "iExact:" H ":" P "does not match goal"
    |env_cbv; apply _ ||
     fail "iExact:" H "not absorbing and the remaining hypotheses not affine"].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
136
137
138
139

Tactic Notation "iAssumptionCore" :=
  let rec find Γ i P :=
    match Γ with
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
140
    | Esnoc ?Γ ?j ?Q => first [unify P Q; unify i j|find Γ i P]
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
141
142
143
    end in
  match goal with
  | |- envs_lookup ?i (Envs ?Γp ?Γs) = Some (_, ?P) =>
144
     first [is_evar i; fail 1 | env_reflexivity]
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
145
  | |- envs_lookup ?i (Envs ?Γp ?Γs) = Some (_, ?P) =>
146
     is_evar i; first [find Γp i P | find Γs i P]; env_reflexivity
147
  | |- envs_lookup_delete ?i (Envs ?Γp ?Γs) = Some (_, ?P, _) =>
148
     first [is_evar i; fail 1 | env_reflexivity]
149
  | |- envs_lookup_delete ?i (Envs ?Γp ?Γs) = Some (_, ?P, _) =>
150
     is_evar i; first [find Γp i P | find Γs i P]; env_reflexivity
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
151
  end.
152

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
153
Tactic Notation "iAssumption" :=
154
155
156
157
  let Hass := fresh in
  let rec find p Γ Q :=
    match Γ with
    | Esnoc ?Γ ?j ?P => first
158
       [pose proof (_ : FromAssumption p P Q) as Hass;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
        eapply (tac_assumption _ _ j p P);
          [env_reflexivity
          |apply Hass
          |env_cbv; apply _ ||
           fail 1 "iAssumption:" j "not absorbing and the remaining hypotheses not affine"]
       |assert (P = False%I) as Hass by reflexivity;
        apply (tac_false_destruct _ j p P);
          [env_reflexivity
          |exact Hass]
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
       |find p Γ Q]
    end in
  match goal with
  | |- of_envs (Envs ?Γp ?Γs)  ?Q =>
     first [find true Γp Q | find false Γs Q
           |fail "iAssumption:" Q "not found"]
  end.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
175
176
177
178
179

(** * False *)
Tactic Notation "iExFalso" := apply tac_ex_falso.

(** * Making hypotheses persistent or pure *)
180
Local Tactic Notation "iPersistent" constr(H) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
181
  eapply tac_persistent with _ H _ _ _; (* (i:=H) *)
182
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iPersistent:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
183
    |apply _ ||
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
184
185
186
187
188
     let P := match goal with |- IntoPersistent _ ?P _ => P end in
     fail "iPersistent:" P "not persistent"
    |env_cbv; apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- Affine ?P => P end in
     fail "iPersistent:" P "not affine"
189
    |env_reflexivity|].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
190

191
Local Tactic Notation "iPure" constr(H) "as" simple_intropattern(pat) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
192
  eapply tac_pure with _ H _ _ _; (* (i:=H1) *)
193
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iPure:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
194
195
196
    |apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- IntoPure ?P _ => P end in
     fail "iPure:" P "not pure"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
197
198
199
    |env_cbv; apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- Affine ?P => P end in
     fail "iPure:" P "not affine"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
200
201
    |intros pat].

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
202
203
204
205
206
Tactic Notation "iEmpIntro" :=
  iStartProof;
  eapply tac_emp_intro;
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iEmpIntro: spatial context is non-empty"].

207
Tactic Notation "iPureIntro" :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
208
  iStartProof;
209
  eapply tac_pure_intro;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
210
211
212
213
    [apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- FromPure ?P _ => P end in
     fail "iPureIntro:" P "not pure"
    |].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
214

215
216
217
218
(** Framing *)
Local Ltac iFrameFinish :=
  lazy iota beta;
  try match goal with
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
219
220
  | |- _  True => exact (bi.pure_intro _ _ I)
  | |- _  emp => iEmpIntro
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
  end.

Local Ltac iFramePure t :=
  let φ := type of t in
  eapply (tac_frame_pure _ _ _ _ t);
    [apply _ || fail "iFrame: cannot frame" φ
    |iFrameFinish].

Local Ltac iFrameHyp H :=
  eapply tac_frame with _ H _ _ _;
231
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iFrame:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
232
233
234
    |apply _ ||
     let R := match goal with |- Frame _ ?R _ _ => R end in
     fail "iFrame: cannot frame" R
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
    |iFrameFinish].

Local Ltac iFrameAnyPure :=
  repeat match goal with H : _ |- _ => iFramePure H end.

Local Ltac iFrameAnyPersistent :=
  let rec go Hs :=
    match Hs with [] => idtac | ?H :: ?Hs => repeat iFrameHyp H; go Hs end in
  match goal with
  | |- of_envs ?Δ  _ =>
     let Hs := eval cbv in (env_dom (env_persistent Δ)) in go Hs
  end.

Local Ltac iFrameAnySpatial :=
  let rec go Hs :=
    match Hs with [] => idtac | ?H :: ?Hs => try iFrameHyp H; go Hs end in
  match goal with
  | |- of_envs ?Δ  _ =>
     let Hs := eval cbv in (env_dom (env_spatial Δ)) in go Hs
  end.

Tactic Notation "iFrame" := iFrameAnySpatial.

Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 ).
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 ).
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 ).
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 ).
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) constr(t6) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 ).
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) constr(t6) constr(t7) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 t7 ).
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) constr(t6) constr(t7) constr(t8)")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 t7 t8 ).

Tactic Notation "iFrame" constr(Hs) :=
  let rec go Hs :=
281
    lazymatch Hs with
282
    | [] => idtac
283
284
285
286
    | SelPure :: ?Hs => iFrameAnyPure; go Hs
    | SelPersistent :: ?Hs => iFrameAnyPersistent; go Hs
    | SelSpatial :: ?Hs => iFrameAnySpatial; go Hs
    | SelName ?H :: ?Hs => iFrameHyp H; go Hs
287
    end
288
  in let Hs := sel_pat.parse Hs in go Hs.
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 ) Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 ) Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4) ")"
    constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 ) Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 ) Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) constr(t6) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 ) Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) constr(t6) constr(t7) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 t7 ) Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) constr(t6) constr(t7) constr(t8)")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 t7 t8 ) Hs.

311
312
313
(** * Basic introduction tactics *)
Local Tactic Notation "iIntro" "(" simple_intropattern(x) ")" :=
  try iStartProof;
314
315
316
  lazymatch goal with
  | |- _  _ =>
    eapply tac_forall_intro;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
317
      [apply _ ||
318
319
320
321
322
       let P := match goal with |- FromForall ?P _ => P end in
       fail "iIntro: cannot turn" P "into a universal quantifier"
      |lazy beta; intros x]
  | |- _ => intros x
  end.
323
324
325
326
327
328

Local Tactic Notation "iIntro" constr(H) :=
  iStartProof;
  first
  [ (* (?Q → _) *)
    eapply tac_impl_intro with _ H; (* (i:=H) *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
329
      [env_cbv; apply _ ||
330
       let P := lazymatch goal with |- Persistent ?P => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
331
332
       fail 1 "iIntro: introducing non-persistent" H ":" P
              "into non-empty spatial context"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
333
      |env_reflexivity || fail 1 "iIntro:" H "not fresh"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
334
      |]
335
336
  | (* (_ -∗ _) *)
    eapply tac_wand_intro with _ H; (* (i:=H) *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
337
338
      [env_reflexivity || fail 1 "iIntro:" H "not fresh"
      |]
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
  | fail 1 "iIntro: nothing to introduce" ].

Local Tactic Notation "iIntro" "#" constr(H) :=
  iStartProof;
  first
  [ (* (?P → _) *)
    eapply tac_impl_intro_persistent with _ H _; (* (i:=H) *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
346
      [apply _ ||
347
       let P := match goal with |- IntoPersistent _ ?P _ => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
348
       fail 1 "iIntro:" P "not persistent"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
349
350
      |env_reflexivity || fail 1 "iIntro:" H "not fresh"
      |]
351
352
  | (* (?P -∗ _) *)
    eapply tac_wand_intro_persistent with _ H _; (* (i:=H) *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
353
      [apply _ ||
354
       let P := match goal with |- IntoPersistent _ ?P _ => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
355
356
357
358
       fail 1 "iIntro:" P "not persistent"
      |apply _ ||
       let P := match goal with |- Affine ?P => P end in
       fail 1 "iIntro:" P "not affine"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
359
360
      |env_reflexivity || fail 1 "iIntro:" H "not fresh"
      |]
361
362
363
364
365
366
  | fail 1 "iIntro: nothing to introduce" ].

Local Tactic Notation "iIntro" "_" :=
  try iStartProof;
  first
  [ (* (?Q → _) *) apply tac_impl_intro_drop
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
367
368
369
370
371
372
  | (* (_ -∗ _) *)
    apply tac_wand_intro_drop;
      [apply _ ||
       let P := match goal with |- TCOr (Affine ?P) _ => P end in
       fail 1 "iIntro:" P "not affine and the goal not absorbing"
      |]
373
374
375
376
377
378
  | (* (∀ _, _) *) iIntro (_)
  | fail 1 "iIntro: nothing to introduce" ].

Local Tactic Notation "iIntroForall" :=
  try iStartProof;
  lazymatch goal with
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
379
  | |-  _, ?P => fail (* actually an →, this is handled by iIntro below *)
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
  | |-  _, _ => intro
  | |- _  ( x : _, _) => let x' := fresh x in iIntro (x')
  end.
Local Tactic Notation "iIntro" :=
  try iStartProof;
  lazymatch goal with
  | |- _  ?P => intro
  | |- _  (_ - _) => iIntro (?) || let H := iFresh in iIntro #H || iIntro H
  | |- _  (_  _) => iIntro (?) || let H := iFresh in iIntro #H || iIntro H
  end.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
391
(** * Specialize *)
392
393
394
395
396
Record iTrm {X As} :=
  ITrm { itrm : X ; itrm_vars : hlist As ; itrm_hyps : string }.
Arguments ITrm {_ _} _ _ _.

Notation "( H $! x1 .. xn )" :=
397
  (ITrm H (hcons x1 .. (hcons xn hnil) ..) "") (at level 0, x1, xn at level 9).
398
Notation "( H $! x1 .. xn 'with' pat )" :=
399
  (ITrm H (hcons x1 .. (hcons xn hnil) ..) pat) (at level 0, x1, xn at level 9).
400
401
Notation "( H 'with' pat )" := (ITrm H hnil pat) (at level 0).

402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
(*
There is some hacky stuff going on here (most probably there is a Coq bug).
Holes -- like unresolved type class instances -- in the argument `xs` are
resolved at arbitrary moments. It seems that tactics like `apply`, `split` and
`eexists` trigger type class search to resolve these holes. To avoid TC being
triggered too eagerly, this tactic uses `refine` at various places instead of
`apply`.

TODO: Investigate what really is going on. Is there a related to Cog bug #5752?
When should holes in an `open_constr` be resolved?
*)
413
Local Tactic Notation "iSpecializeArgs" constr(H) open_constr(xs) :=
414
  let rec go xs :=
415
    lazymatch xs with
416
    | hnil => apply id (* Finally, trigger TC *)
417
    | hcons ?x ?xs =>
418
       eapply tac_forall_specialize with _ H _ _ _; (* (i:=H) (a:=x) *)
419
420
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H "not found"
         |typeclasses eauto ||
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
421
          let P := match goal with |- IntoForall ?P _ => P end in
422
423
424
425
          fail "iSpecialize: cannot instantiate" P "with" x
         |lazymatch goal with (* Force [A] in [ex_intro] to deal with coercions. *)
          | |-  _ : ?A, _ => refine (@ex_intro A _ x (conj _ _))
          end; [env_reflexivity|go xs]]
426
427
    end in
  go xs.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
428

429
Local Tactic Notation "iSpecializePat" open_constr(H) constr(pat) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
430
  let solve_to_wand H1 :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
431
    apply _ ||
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
432
    let P := match goal with |- IntoWand _ _ ?P _ _ => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
433
    fail "iSpecialize:" P "not an implication/wand" in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
434
435
436
  let rec go H1 pats :=
    lazymatch pats with
    | [] => idtac
437
438
439
    | SForall :: ?pats =>
       idtac "the * specialization pattern is deprecated because it is applied implicitly";
       go H1 pats
440
    | SName ?H2 :: ?pats =>
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
441
       eapply tac_specialize with _ _ H2 _ H1 _ _ _ _; (* (j:=H1) (i:=H2) *)
442
443
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H2 "not found"
         |env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H1 "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
444
         |apply _ ||
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
445
446
          let P := match goal with |- IntoWand _ _ ?P ?Q _ => P end in
          let Q := match goal with |- IntoWand _ _ ?P ?Q _ => Q end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
447
          fail "iSpecialize: cannot instantiate" P "with" Q
448
         |env_reflexivity|go H1 pats]
449
450
    | SPureGoal ?d :: ?pats =>
       eapply tac_specialize_assert_pure with _ H1 _ _ _ _ _;
451
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H1 "not found"
452
         |solve_to_wand H1
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
453
454
455
         |apply _ ||
          let Q := match goal with |- FromPure ?Q _ => Q end in
          fail "iSpecialize:" Q "not pure"
456
         |env_reflexivity
457
         |done_if d (*goal*)
458
         |go H1 pats]
459
460
    | SGoal (SpecGoal GPersistent false ?Hs_frame [] ?d) :: ?pats =>
       eapply tac_specialize_assert_persistent with _ _ H1 _ _ _ _;
461
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H1 "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
462
         |solve_to_wand H1
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
463
         |apply _ ||
464
          let Q := match goal with |- Persistent ?Q => Q end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
465
          fail "iSpecialize:" Q "not persistent"
466
         |env_reflexivity
467
         |iFrame Hs_frame; done_if d (*goal*)
468
         |go H1 pats]
469
470
471
    | SGoal (SpecGoal GPersistent _ _ _ _) :: ?pats =>
       fail "iSpecialize: cannot select hypotheses for persistent premise"
    | SGoal (SpecGoal ?m ?lr ?Hs_frame ?Hs ?d) :: ?pats =>
472
       let Hs' := eval cbv in (if lr then Hs else Hs_frame ++ Hs) in
473
       eapply tac_specialize_assert with _ _ _ H1 _ lr Hs' _ _ _ _;
474
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H1 "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
475
         |solve_to_wand H1
476
477
478
         |lazymatch m with
          | GSpatial => apply elim_modal_dummy
          | GModal => apply _ || fail "iSpecialize: goal not a modality"
479
          end
480
481
         |env_reflexivity ||
          let Hs' := iMissingHyps Hs' in
482
          fail "iSpecialize: hypotheses" Hs' "not found"
483
         |iFrame Hs_frame; done_if d (*goal*)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
484
         |go H1 pats]
485
486
    | SAutoFrame GPersistent :: ?pats =>
       eapply tac_specialize_assert_persistent with _ _ H1 _ _ _ _;
487
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H1 "not found"
488
         |solve_to_wand H1
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
489
         |apply _ ||
490
          let Q := match goal with |- Persistent ?Q => Q end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
491
          fail "iSpecialize:" Q "not persistent"
492
         |env_reflexivity
493
494
495
496
         |solve [iFrame "∗ #"]
         |go H1 pats]
    | SAutoFrame ?m :: ?pats =>
       eapply tac_specialize_frame with _ H1 _ _ _ _ _ _;
497
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H1 "not found"
498
499
500
501
502
         |solve_to_wand H1
         |lazymatch m with
          | GSpatial => apply elim_modal_dummy
          | GModal => apply _ || fail "iSpecialize: goal not a modality"
          end
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
503
504
         |iFrame "∗ #"; apply tac_unlock ||
          fail "iSpecialize: premise cannot be solved by framing"
505
         |reflexivity]; iIntro H1; go H1 pats
506
507
    end in let pats := spec_pat.parse pat in go H pats.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
508
(* The argument [p] denotes whether the conclusion of the specialized term is
509
510
511
persistent. If so, one can use all spatial hypotheses for both proving the
premises and the remaning goal. The argument [p] can either be a Boolean or an
introduction pattern, which will be coerced into [true] when it solely contains
512
513
514
515
516
`#` or `%` patterns at the top-level.

In case the specialization pattern in [t] states that the modality of the goal
should be kept for one of the premises (i.e. [>[H1 .. Hn]] is used) then [p]
defaults to [false] (i.e. spatial hypotheses are not preserved). *)
517
Tactic Notation "iSpecializeCore" open_constr(t) "as" constr(p) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
518
  let p := intro_pat_persistent p in
519
520
  let t :=
    match type of t with string => constr:(ITrm t hnil "") | _ => t end in
521
522
  lazymatch t with
  | ITrm ?H ?xs ?pat =>
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
523
    iSpecializeArgs H xs;
524
525
    lazymatch type of H with
    | string =>
526
527
528
529
530
531
      (* The lemma [tac_specialize_persistent_helper] allows one to use all
      spatial hypotheses for both proving the premises of the lemma we
      specialize as well as those of the remaining goal. We can only use it when
      the result of the specialization is persistent, and no modality is
      eliminated. As an optimization, we do not use this when only universal
      quantifiers are instantiated. *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
532
      let pat := spec_pat.parse pat in
533
534
      lazymatch eval compute in
        (bool_decide (pat  []) && p && negb (existsb spec_pat_modal pat)) with
535
      | true =>
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
536
         eapply tac_specialize_persistent_helper with _ H _ _ _ _;
537
           [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
538
           |iSpecializePat H pat; last (iExact H)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
539
           |apply _ ||
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
540
            let Q := match goal with |- IntoPersistent _ ?Q _ => Q end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
541
            fail "iSpecialize:" Q "not persistent"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
542
543
544
545
546
547
           |env_cbv; apply _ ||
            let Q := match goal with |- Affine ?Q => Q end in
            fail "iSpecialize:" Q "not affine"
           |env_reflexivity
           |(* goal *)]
      | false => iSpecializePat H pat
548
549
      end
    | _ => fail "iSpecialize:" H "should be a hypothesis, use iPoseProof instead"
550
    end
551
  | _ => fail "iSpecialize:" t "should be a proof mode term"
552
  end.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
553

554
Tactic Notation "iSpecialize" open_constr(t) :=
555
556
557
  iSpecializeCore t as false.
Tactic Notation "iSpecialize" open_constr(t) "as" "#" :=
  iSpecializeCore t as true.
558

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
559
(** * Pose proof *)
560
561
(* The tactic [iIntoValid] tactic solves a goal [uPred_valid Q]. The
arguments [t] is a Coq term whose type is of the following shape:
562

563
- [∀ (x_1 : A_1) .. (x_n : A_n), uPred_valid Q]
564
- [∀ (x_1 : A_1) .. (x_n : A_n), P1 ⊢ P2], in which case [Q] becomes [P1 -∗ P2]
565
566
567
568
- [∀ (x_1 : A_1) .. (x_n : A_n), P1 ⊣⊢ P2], in which case [Q] becomes [P1 ↔ P2]

The tactic instantiates each dependent argument [x_i] with an evar and generates
a goal [P] for non-dependent arguments [x_i : P]. *)
569
Tactic Notation "iIntoValid" open_constr(t) :=
570
  let rec go t :=
571
    let tT := type of t in
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
    lazymatch eval hnf in tT with
    | ?P  ?Q => let H := fresh in assert P as H; [|go uconstr:(t H); clear H]
    |  _ : ?T, _ =>
      (* Put [T] inside an [id] to avoid TC inference from being invoked. *)
      (* This is a workarround for Coq bug #4969. *)
      let e := fresh in evar (e:id T);
      let e' := eval unfold e in e in clear e; go (t e')
    | _ =>
      let tT' := eval cbv zeta in tT in apply (proj1 (_ : AsValid tT' _) t)
      || fail "iPoseProof: not a uPred"
    end in
583
  go t.
584

585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
(* The tactic [tac] is called with a temporary fresh name [H]. The argument
[lazy_tc] denotes whether type class inference on the premises of [lem] should
be performed before (if false) or after (if true) [tac H] is called. *)
Tactic Notation "iPoseProofCore" open_constr(lem)
    "as" constr(p) constr(lazy_tc) tactic(tac) :=
  try iStartProof;
  let Htmp := iFresh in
  let t :=
    lazymatch lem with ITrm ?t ?xs ?pat => t | _ => lem end in
  let spec_tac _ :=
    lazymatch lem with
    | ITrm ?t ?xs ?pat => iSpecializeCore (ITrm Htmp xs pat) as p
    | _ => idtac
    end in
  let go goal_tac :=
600
601
602
    lazymatch type of t with
    | string =>
       eapply tac_pose_proof_hyp with _ _ t _ Htmp _;
603
604
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iPoseProof:" t "not found"
         |env_reflexivity || fail "iPoseProof:" Htmp "not fresh"
605
         |goal_tac ()]
606
607
    | _ =>
       eapply tac_pose_proof with _ Htmp _; (* (j:=H) *)
608
         [iIntoValid t
609
         |env_reflexivity || fail "iPoseProof:" Htmp "not fresh"
610
         |goal_tac ()]
611
    end;
612
613
614
615
    try (apply _) in
  lazymatch eval compute in lazy_tc with
  | true => go ltac:(fun _ => spec_tac (); last (tac Htmp))
  | false => go spec_tac; last (tac Htmp)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
616
617
618
  end.

(** * Apply *)
619
Tactic Notation "iApplyHyp" constr(H) :=
620
621
  let rec go H := first
    [eapply tac_apply with _ H _ _ _;
622
      [env_reflexivity
623
624
      |apply _
      |lazy beta (* reduce betas created by instantiation *)]
625
    |iSpecializePat H "[]"; last go H] in
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
  iExact H ||
  go H ||
  lazymatch iTypeOf H with
  | Some (_,?Q) => fail "iApply: cannot apply" Q
  end.

Tactic Notation "iApply" open_constr(lem) :=
  iPoseProofCore lem as false true (fun H => iApplyHyp H).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
634
635

(** * Revert *)
636
Local Tactic Notation "iForallRevert" ident(x) :=
637
638
639
640
641
642
  let err x :=
    intros x;
    iMatchHyp (fun H P =>
      lazymatch P with
      | context [x] => fail 2 "iRevert:" x "is used in hypothesis" H
      end) in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
643
  iStartProof;
644
645
  let A := type of x in
  lazymatch type of A with
646
647
648
  | Prop => revert x; first [apply tac_pure_revert|err x]
  | _ => revert x; first [apply tac_forall_revert|err x]
  end.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
649
650

Tactic Notation "iRevert" constr(Hs) :=
651
652
  let rec go Hs :=
    lazymatch Hs with
653
    | [] => idtac
654
655
656
657
658
    | ESelPure :: ?Hs =>
       repeat match goal with x : _ |- _ => revert x end;
       go Hs
    | ESelName _ ?H :: ?Hs =>
       eapply tac_revert with _ H _ _; (* (i:=H2) *)
659
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iRevert:" H "not found"
660
         |env_cbv; go Hs]
661
    end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
662
  let Hs := iElaborateSelPat Hs in iStartProof; go Hs.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
663

664
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ")" :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
665
  iForallRevert x1.
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x2; iRevert ( x1 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x3; iRevert ( x1 x2 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x4; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x5; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ident(x6) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x6; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ident(x6) ident(x7) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x7; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ident(x6) ident(x7) ident(x8) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x8; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 ).

Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4) ")"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
692
    constr(Hs) :=
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ident(x6) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ident(x6) ident(x7) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ident(x6) ident(x7) ident(x8) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 x8 ).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
706
707
708

(** * Disjunction *)
Tactic Notation "iLeft" :=
709
  iStartProof;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
710
  eapply tac_or_l;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
711
712
713
714
    [apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- FromOr ?P _ _ => P end in
     fail "iLeft:" P "not a disjunction"
    |].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
715
Tactic Notation "iRight" :=
716
  iStartProof;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
717
  eapply tac_or_r;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
718
719
720
721
    [apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- FromOr ?P _ _ => P end in
     fail "iRight:" P "not a disjunction"
    |].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
722

723
Local Tactic Notation "iOrDestruct" constr(H) "as" constr(H1) constr(H2) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
724
  eapply tac_or_destruct with _ _ H _ H1 H2 _ _ _; (* (i:=H) (j1:=H1) (j2:=H2) *)
725
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iOrDestruct:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
726
727
728
    |apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- IntoOr ?P _ _ => P end in
     fail "iOrDestruct: cannot destruct" P
729
    |env_reflexivity || fail "iOrDestruct:" H1 "not fresh"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
730
731
    |env_reflexivity || fail "iOrDestruct:" H2 "not fresh"
    | |].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
732
733
734

(** * Conjunction and separating conjunction *)
Tactic Notation "iSplit" :=
735
  iStartProof;
736
737
738
  lazymatch goal with
  | |- _  _ =>
    eapply tac_and_split;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
739
      [apply _ ||
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
740
       let P := match goal with |- FromAnd ?P _ _ => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
741
       fail "iSplit:" P "not a conjunction"| |]
742
  end.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
743
744

Tactic Notation "iSplitL" constr(Hs) :=
745
  iStartProof;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
746
747
  let Hs := words Hs in
  eapply tac_sep_split with _ _ false Hs _ _; (* (js:=Hs) *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
748
    [apply _ ||
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
749
     let P := match goal with |- FromSep _ ?P _ _ => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
750
     fail "iSplitL:" P "not a separating conjunction"
751
752
    |env_reflexivity ||
     let Hs := iMissingHyps Hs in
753
     fail "iSplitL: hypotheses" Hs "not found"
754
755
    | |].

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
756
Tactic Notation "iSplitR" constr(Hs) :=
757
  iStartProof;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
758
759
  let Hs := words Hs in
  eapply tac_sep_split with _ _ true Hs _ _; (* (js:=Hs) *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
760
    [apply _ ||
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
761
     let P := match goal with |- FromSep _ ?P _ _ => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
762
     fail "iSplitR:" P "not a separating conjunction"
763
764
    |env_reflexivity ||
     let Hs := iMissingHyps Hs in
765
     fail "iSplitR: hypotheses" Hs "not found"
766
    | |].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
767
768
769
770

Tactic Notation "iSplitL" := iSplitR "".
Tactic Notation "iSplitR" := iSplitL "".

771
772
Local Tactic Notation "iAndDestruct" constr(H) "as" constr(H1) constr(H2) :=
  eapply tac_and_destruct with _ H _ H1 H2 _ _ _; (* (i:=H) (j1:=H1) (j2:=H2) *)
773
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iAndDestruct:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
774
    |apply _ ||
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
775
     let P := match goal with |- IntoSep _ ?P _ _ => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
776
     fail "iAndDestruct: cannot destruct" P
777
    |env_reflexivity || fail "iAndDestruct:" H1 "or" H2 " not fresh"|].
778
779
780

Local Tactic Notation "iAndDestructChoice" constr(H) "as" constr(lr) constr(H') :=
  eapply tac_and_destruct_choice with _ H _ lr H' _ _ _;
781
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iAndDestructChoice:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
782
783
    |env_cbv; apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- TCOr (IntoAnd _ ?P _ _) _ => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
784
     fail "iAndDestructChoice: cannot destruct" P
785
    |env_reflexivity || fail "iAndDestructChoice:" H' " not fresh"|].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
786

787
788
789
790
(** * Combinining hypotheses *)
Tactic Notation "iCombine" constr(Hs) "as" constr(H) :=
  let Hs := words Hs in
  eapply tac_combine with _ _ Hs _ _ H _;
791
792
    [env_reflexivity ||
     let Hs := iMissingHyps Hs in
793
     fail "iCombine: hypotheses" Hs "not found"
794
    |apply _
795
    |env_reflexivity || fail "iCombine:" H "not fresh"|].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
796

797
798
799
Tactic Notation "iCombine" constr(H1) constr(H2) "as" constr(H) :=
  iCombine [H1;H2] as H.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
800
(** * Existential *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
801
Tactic Notation "iExists" uconstr(x1) :=
802
  iStartProof;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
803
  eapply tac_exist;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
804
805
806
    [apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- FromExist ?P _ => P end in
     fail "iExists:" P "not an existential"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
807
    |cbv beta; eexists x1].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
808

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
809
Tactic Notation "iExists" uconstr(x1) "," uconstr(x2) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
810
  iExists x1; iExists x2.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
811
Tactic Notation "iExists" uconstr(x1) "," uconstr(x2) "," uconstr(x3) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
812
  iExists x1; iExists x2, x3.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
813
814
Tactic Notation "iExists" uconstr(x1) "," uconstr(x2) "," uconstr(x3) ","
    uconstr(x4) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
815
  iExists x1; iExists x2, x3, x4.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
816
817
Tactic Notation "iExists" uconstr(x1) "," uconstr(x2) "," uconstr(x3) ","
    uconstr(x4) "," uconstr(x5) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
818
  iExists x1; iExists x2, x3, x4, x5.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
819
820
Tactic Notation "iExists" uconstr(x1) "," uconstr(x2) "," uconstr(x3) ","
    uconstr(x4) "," uconstr(x5) "," uconstr(x6) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
821
  iExists x1; iExists x2, x3, x4, x5, x6.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
822
823
Tactic Notation "iExists" uconstr(x1) "," uconstr(x2) "," uconstr(x3) ","
    uconstr(x4) "," uconstr(x5) "," uconstr(x6) "," uconstr(x7) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
824
  iExists x1; iExists x2, x3, x4, x5, x6, x7.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
825
826
827
Tactic Notation "iExists" uconstr(x1) "," uconstr(x2) "," uconstr(x3) ","
    uconstr(x4) "," uconstr(x5) "," uconstr(x6) "," uconstr(x7) ","
    uconstr(x8) :=