tactics.v 68.3 KB
Newer Older
1 2
From iris.proofmode Require Import coq_tactics.
From iris.proofmode Require Import intro_patterns spec_patterns sel_patterns.
3
From iris.base_logic Require Export base_logic.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
4
From iris.proofmode Require Export classes notation.
5
From iris.proofmode Require Import class_instances.
Ralf Jung's avatar
Ralf Jung committed
6
From stdpp Require Import stringmap hlist.
7
From iris.proofmode Require Import strings.
8
Set Default Proof Using "Type".
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
9 10

Declare Reduction env_cbv := cbv [
11
  beq ascii_beq string_beq
12 13
  env_lookup env_lookup_delete env_delete env_app env_replace env_dom
  env_persistent env_spatial env_spatial_is_nil envs_dom
14
  envs_lookup envs_lookup_delete envs_delete envs_snoc envs_app
15 16
    envs_simple_replace envs_replace envs_split
    envs_clear_spatial envs_clear_persistent
17
    envs_split_go envs_split].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
18 19
Ltac env_cbv :=
  match goal with |- ?u => let v := eval env_cbv in u in change v end.
20
Ltac env_reflexivity := env_cbv; reflexivity.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
21

22
(** * Misc *)
23 24
(* Tactic Notation tactics cannot return terms *)
Ltac iFresh' H :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
25 26
  lazymatch goal with
  |- of_envs ?Δ  _ =>
27 28 29
     (* [vm_compute fails] if any of the hypotheses in [Δ] contain evars, so
     first use [cbv] to compute the domain of [Δ] *)
     let Hs := eval cbv in (envs_dom Δ) in
30 31
     eval vm_compute in (fresh_string_of_set H (of_list Hs))
  | _ => H
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
32
  end.
33
Ltac iFresh := iFresh' "~".
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
34

35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43
Ltac iMissingHyps Hs :=
  let Δ :=
    lazymatch goal with
    | |- of_envs ?Δ  _ => Δ
    | |- context[ envs_split _ _ ?Δ ] => Δ
    end in
  let Hhyps := eval env_cbv in (envs_dom Δ) in
  eval vm_compute in (list_difference Hs Hhyps).

44
Ltac iTypeOf H :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
45
  let Δ := match goal with |- of_envs ?Δ  _ => Δ end in
46
  eval env_cbv in (envs_lookup H Δ).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
47

48
Tactic Notation "iMatchHyp" tactic1(tac) :=
49 50 51 52
  match goal with
  | |- context[ environments.Esnoc _ ?x ?P ] => tac x P
  end.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
53
(** * Start a proof *)
54
Ltac iStartProof :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
55
  lazymatch goal with
56
  | |- of_envs _  _ => idtac
57
  | |- ?P =>
58
    lazymatch eval hnf in P with
59
    (* need to use the unfolded version of [uPred_valid] due to the hnf *)
60 61 62 63
    | True  _ => apply tac_adequate
    | _  _ => apply uPred.wand_entails, tac_adequate
    (* need to use the unfolded version of [⊣⊢] due to the hnf *)
    | uPred_equiv' _ _ => apply uPred.iff_equiv, tac_adequate
64
    | _ => fail "iStartProof: not a uPred"
65
    end
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
66 67 68 69 70
  end.

(** * Context manipulation *)
Tactic Notation "iRename" constr(H1) "into" constr(H2) :=
  eapply tac_rename with _ H1 H2 _ _; (* (i:=H1) (j:=H2) *)
71 72
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iRename:" H1 "not found"
    |env_reflexivity || fail "iRename:" H2 "not fresh"|].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
73

74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101
Local Inductive esel_pat :=
  | ESelPure
  | ESelName : bool  string  esel_pat.

Ltac iElaborateSelPat pat tac :=
  let rec go pat Δ Hs :=
    lazymatch pat with
    | [] => let Hs' := eval cbv in Hs in tac Hs'
    | SelPure :: ?pat => go pat Δ (ESelPure :: Hs)
    | SelPersistent :: ?pat =>
       let Hs' := eval env_cbv in (env_dom (env_persistent Δ)) in
       let Δ' := eval env_cbv in (envs_clear_persistent Δ) in
       go pat Δ' ((ESelName true <$> Hs') ++ Hs)
    | SelSpatial :: ?pat =>
       let Hs' := eval env_cbv in (env_dom (env_spatial Δ)) in
       let Δ' := eval env_cbv in (envs_clear_spatial Δ) in
       go pat Δ' ((ESelName false <$> Hs') ++ Hs)
    | SelName ?H :: ?pat =>
       lazymatch eval env_cbv in (envs_lookup_delete H Δ) with
       | Some (?p,_,?Δ') => go pat Δ' (ESelName p H :: Hs)
       | None => fail "iElaborateSelPat:" H "not found"
       end
    end in
  lazymatch goal with
  | |- of_envs ?Δ  _ =>
    let pat := sel_pat.parse pat in go pat Δ (@nil esel_pat)
  end.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
102 103
Tactic Notation "iClear" constr(Hs) :=
  let rec go Hs :=
104
    lazymatch Hs with
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
105
    | [] => idtac
106 107
    | ESelPure :: ?Hs => clear; go Hs
    | ESelName _ ?H :: ?Hs =>
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
108
       eapply tac_clear with _ H _ _; (* (i:=H) *)
109
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iClear:" H "not found"|go Hs]
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
110
    end in
111 112
  iElaborateSelPat Hs go.

113 114
Tactic Notation "iClear" "(" ident_list(xs) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iClear Hs; clear xs.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
115 116 117

(** * Assumptions *)
Tactic Notation "iExact" constr(H) :=
118
  eapply tac_assumption with H _ _; (* (i:=H) *)
119
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iExact:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
120 121 122
    |apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- FromAssumption _ ?P _ => P end in
     fail "iExact:" H ":" P "does not match goal"].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130

Tactic Notation "iAssumptionCore" :=
  let rec find Γ i P :=
    match Γ with
    | Esnoc ?Γ ?j ?Q => first [unify P Q; unify i j| find Γ i P]
    end in
  match goal with
  | |- envs_lookup ?i (Envs ?Γp ?Γs) = Some (_, ?P) =>
131
     first [is_evar i; fail 1 | env_reflexivity]
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
132
  | |- envs_lookup ?i (Envs ?Γp ?Γs) = Some (_, ?P) =>
133
     is_evar i; first [find Γp i P | find Γs i P]; env_reflexivity
134
  | |- envs_lookup_delete ?i (Envs ?Γp ?Γs) = Some (_, ?P, _) =>
135
     first [is_evar i; fail 1 | env_reflexivity]
136
  | |- envs_lookup_delete ?i (Envs ?Γp ?Γs) = Some (_, ?P, _) =>
137
     is_evar i; first [find Γp i P | find Γs i P]; env_reflexivity
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
138
  end.
139

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
140
Tactic Notation "iAssumption" :=
141 142 143 144
  let Hass := fresh in
  let rec find p Γ Q :=
    match Γ with
    | Esnoc ?Γ ?j ?P => first
145
       [pose proof (_ : FromAssumption p P Q) as Hass;
146
        apply (tac_assumption _ j p P); [env_reflexivity|apply Hass]
147 148 149 150 151 152 153
       |find p Γ Q]
    end in
  match goal with
  | |- of_envs (Envs ?Γp ?Γs)  ?Q =>
     first [find true Γp Q | find false Γs Q
           |fail "iAssumption:" Q "not found"]
  end.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
154 155 156 157 158

(** * False *)
Tactic Notation "iExFalso" := apply tac_ex_falso.

(** * Making hypotheses persistent or pure *)
159
Local Tactic Notation "iPersistent" constr(H) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
160
  eapply tac_persistent with _ H _ _ _; (* (i:=H) *)
161
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iPersistent:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
162 163 164
    |apply _ ||
     let Q := match goal with |- IntoPersistentP ?Q _ => Q end in
     fail "iPersistent:" Q "not persistent"
165
    |env_reflexivity|].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
166

167
Local Tactic Notation "iPure" constr(H) "as" simple_intropattern(pat) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
168
  eapply tac_pure with _ H _ _ _; (* (i:=H1) *)
169
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iPure:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
170 171 172
    |apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- IntoPure ?P _ => P end in
     fail "iPure:" P "not pure"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
173 174
    |intros pat].

175
Tactic Notation "iPureIntro" :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
176
  iStartProof;
177
  eapply tac_pure_intro;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
178 179 180 181
    [apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- FromPure ?P _ => P end in
     fail "iPureIntro:" P "not pure"
    |].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
182

183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197
(** Framing *)
Local Ltac iFrameFinish :=
  lazy iota beta;
  try match goal with
  | |- _  True => exact (uPred.pure_intro _ _ I)
  end.

Local Ltac iFramePure t :=
  let φ := type of t in
  eapply (tac_frame_pure _ _ _ _ t);
    [apply _ || fail "iFrame: cannot frame" φ
    |iFrameFinish].

Local Ltac iFrameHyp H :=
  eapply tac_frame with _ H _ _ _;
198
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iFrame:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
199 200 201
    |apply _ ||
     let R := match goal with |- Frame _ ?R _ _ => R end in
     fail "iFrame: cannot frame" R
202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247
    |iFrameFinish].

Local Ltac iFrameAnyPure :=
  repeat match goal with H : _ |- _ => iFramePure H end.

Local Ltac iFrameAnyPersistent :=
  let rec go Hs :=
    match Hs with [] => idtac | ?H :: ?Hs => repeat iFrameHyp H; go Hs end in
  match goal with
  | |- of_envs ?Δ  _ =>
     let Hs := eval cbv in (env_dom (env_persistent Δ)) in go Hs
  end.

Local Ltac iFrameAnySpatial :=
  let rec go Hs :=
    match Hs with [] => idtac | ?H :: ?Hs => try iFrameHyp H; go Hs end in
  match goal with
  | |- of_envs ?Δ  _ =>
     let Hs := eval cbv in (env_dom (env_spatial Δ)) in go Hs
  end.

Tactic Notation "iFrame" := iFrameAnySpatial.

Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 ).
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 ).
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 ).
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 ).
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) constr(t6) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 ).
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) constr(t6) constr(t7) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 t7 ).
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) constr(t6) constr(t7) constr(t8)")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 t7 t8 ).

Tactic Notation "iFrame" constr(Hs) :=
  let rec go Hs :=
248
    lazymatch Hs with
249
    | [] => idtac
250 251 252 253
    | SelPure :: ?Hs => iFrameAnyPure; go Hs
    | SelPersistent :: ?Hs => iFrameAnyPersistent; go Hs
    | SelSpatial :: ?Hs => iFrameAnySpatial; go Hs
    | SelName ?H :: ?Hs => iFrameHyp H; go Hs
254
    end
255
  in let Hs := sel_pat.parse Hs in go Hs.
256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 ) Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 ) Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4) ")"
    constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 ) Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 ) Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) constr(t6) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 ) Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) constr(t6) constr(t7) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 t7 ) Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) constr(t6) constr(t7) constr(t8)")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 t7 t8 ) Hs.

278 279 280 281 282 283
(** * Basic introduction tactics *)
Local Tactic Notation "iIntro" "(" simple_intropattern(x) ")" :=
  try iStartProof;
  try first
    [(* (∀ _, _) *) apply tac_forall_intro
    |(* (?P → _) *) eapply tac_impl_intro_pure;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
284 285 286 287
      [apply _ ||
       let P := match goal with |- IntoPure ?P _ => P end in
       fail "iIntro:" P "not pure"
      |]
288
    |(* (?P -∗ _) *) eapply tac_wand_intro_pure;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
289 290 291 292
      [apply _ ||
       let P := match goal with |- IntoPure ?P _ => P end in
       fail "iIntro:" P "not pure"
      |]
293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303
    |(* ⌜∀ _, _⌝ *) apply tac_pure_forall_intro
    |(* ⌜_ → _⌝ *) apply tac_pure_impl_intro];
  intros x.

Local Tactic Notation "iIntro" constr(H) :=
  iStartProof;
  first
  [ (* (?Q → _) *)
    eapply tac_impl_intro with _ H; (* (i:=H) *)
      [reflexivity || fail 1 "iIntro: introducing" H
                             "into non-empty spatial context"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
304 305
      |env_reflexivity || fail "iIntro:" H "not fresh"
      |]
306 307
  | (* (_ -∗ _) *)
    eapply tac_wand_intro with _ H; (* (i:=H) *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
308 309
      [env_reflexivity || fail 1 "iIntro:" H "not fresh"
      |]
310 311 312 313 314 315 316
  | fail 1 "iIntro: nothing to introduce" ].

Local Tactic Notation "iIntro" "#" constr(H) :=
  iStartProof;
  first
  [ (* (?P → _) *)
    eapply tac_impl_intro_persistent with _ H _; (* (i:=H) *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
317 318 319 320 321
      [apply _ || 
       let P := match goal with |- IntoPersistentP ?P _ => P end in
       fail 1 "iIntro: " P " not persistent"
      |env_reflexivity || fail 1 "iIntro:" H "not fresh"
      |]
322 323
  | (* (?P -∗ _) *)
    eapply tac_wand_intro_persistent with _ H _; (* (i:=H) *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
324 325 326 327 328
      [apply _ || 
       let P := match goal with |- IntoPersistentP ?P _ => P end in
       fail 1 "iIntro: " P " not persistent"
      |env_reflexivity || fail 1 "iIntro:" H "not fresh"
      |]
329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353
  | fail 1 "iIntro: nothing to introduce" ].

Local Tactic Notation "iIntro" "_" :=
  try iStartProof;
  first
  [ (* (?Q → _) *) apply tac_impl_intro_drop
  | (* (_ -∗ _) *) apply tac_wand_intro_drop
  | (* (∀ _, _) *) iIntro (_)
  | fail 1 "iIntro: nothing to introduce" ].

Local Tactic Notation "iIntroForall" :=
  try iStartProof;
  lazymatch goal with
  | |-  _, ?P => fail
  | |-  _, _ => intro
  | |- _  ( x : _, _) => let x' := fresh x in iIntro (x')
  end.
Local Tactic Notation "iIntro" :=
  try iStartProof;
  lazymatch goal with
  | |- _  ?P => intro
  | |- _  (_ - _) => iIntro (?) || let H := iFresh in iIntro #H || iIntro H
  | |- _  (_  _) => iIntro (?) || let H := iFresh in iIntro #H || iIntro H
  end.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
354
(** * Specialize *)
355 356 357 358 359
Record iTrm {X As} :=
  ITrm { itrm : X ; itrm_vars : hlist As ; itrm_hyps : string }.
Arguments ITrm {_ _} _ _ _.

Notation "( H $! x1 .. xn )" :=
360
  (ITrm H (hcons x1 .. (hcons xn hnil) ..) "") (at level 0, x1, xn at level 9).
361
Notation "( H $! x1 .. xn 'with' pat )" :=
362
  (ITrm H (hcons x1 .. (hcons xn hnil) ..) pat) (at level 0, x1, xn at level 9).
363 364
Notation "( H 'with' pat )" := (ITrm H hnil pat) (at level 0).

365
Local Tactic Notation "iSpecializeArgs" constr(H) open_constr(xs) :=
366
  let rec go xs :=
367
    lazymatch xs with
368 369
    | hnil => idtac
    | hcons ?x ?xs =>
370
       eapply tac_forall_specialize with _ H _ _ _; (* (i:=H) (a:=x) *)
371
         [env_reflexivity || fail 1 "iSpecialize:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
372 373 374
         |apply _ ||
          let P := match goal with |- IntoForall ?P _ => P end in
          fail 1 "iSpecialize: cannot instantiate" P "with" x
375
         |exists x; split; [env_reflexivity|go xs]]
376 377
    end in
  go xs.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
378

379
Local Tactic Notation "iSpecializePat" constr(H) constr(pat) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
380
  let solve_to_wand H1 :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
381
    apply _ ||
382
    let P := match goal with |- IntoWand ?P _ _ => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
383
    fail "iSpecialize:" P "not an implication/wand" in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
384 385 386
  let rec go H1 pats :=
    lazymatch pats with
    | [] => idtac
387 388 389
    | SForall :: ?pats =>
       idtac "the * specialization pattern is deprecated because it is applied implicitly";
       go H1 pats
390
    | SName ?H2 :: ?pats =>
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
391
       eapply tac_specialize with _ _ H2 _ H1 _ _ _ _; (* (j:=H1) (i:=H2) *)
392 393
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H2 "not found"
         |env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H1 "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
394 395
         |apply _ ||
          let P := match goal with |- IntoWand ?P ?Q _ => P end in
396
          let Q := match goal with |- IntoWand ?P ?Q _ => Q end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
397
          fail "iSpecialize: cannot instantiate" P "with" Q
398
         |env_reflexivity|go H1 pats]
399 400
    | SPureGoal ?d :: ?pats =>
       eapply tac_specialize_assert_pure with _ H1 _ _ _ _ _;
401
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H1 "not found"
402
         |solve_to_wand H1
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
403 404 405
         |apply _ ||
          let Q := match goal with |- FromPure ?Q _ => Q end in
          fail "iSpecialize:" Q "not pure"
406
         |env_reflexivity
407
         |done_if d (*goal*)
408
         |go H1 pats]
409 410
    | SGoal (SpecGoal GPersistent false ?Hs_frame [] ?d) :: ?pats =>
       eapply tac_specialize_assert_persistent with _ _ H1 _ _ _ _;
411
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H1 "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
412
         |solve_to_wand H1
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
413 414 415
         |apply _ ||
          let Q := match goal with |- PersistentP ?Q => Q end in
          fail "iSpecialize:" Q "not persistent"
416
         |env_reflexivity
417
         |iFrame Hs_frame; done_if d (*goal*)
418
         |go H1 pats]
419 420 421
    | SGoal (SpecGoal GPersistent _ _ _ _) :: ?pats =>
       fail "iSpecialize: cannot select hypotheses for persistent premise"
    | SGoal (SpecGoal ?m ?lr ?Hs_frame ?Hs ?d) :: ?pats =>
422
       let Hs' := eval cbv in (if lr then Hs else Hs_frame ++ Hs) in
423
       eapply tac_specialize_assert with _ _ _ H1 _ lr Hs' _ _ _ _;
424
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H1 "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
425
         |solve_to_wand H1
426 427 428
         |lazymatch m with
          | GSpatial => apply elim_modal_dummy
          | GModal => apply _ || fail "iSpecialize: goal not a modality"
429
          end
430 431
         |env_reflexivity ||
          let Hs' := iMissingHyps Hs' in
432
          fail "iSpecialize: hypotheses" Hs' "not found"
433
         |iFrame Hs_frame; done_if d (*goal*)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
434
         |go H1 pats]
435 436
    | SAutoFrame GPersistent :: ?pats =>
       eapply tac_specialize_assert_persistent with _ _ H1 _ _ _ _;
437
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H1 "not found"
438
         |solve_to_wand H1
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
439 440 441
         |apply _ ||
          let Q := match goal with |- PersistentP ?Q => Q end in
          fail "iSpecialize:" Q "not persistent"
442
         |env_reflexivity
443 444 445 446
         |solve [iFrame "∗ #"]
         |go H1 pats]
    | SAutoFrame ?m :: ?pats =>
       eapply tac_specialize_frame with _ H1 _ _ _ _ _ _;
447
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H1 "not found"
448 449 450 451 452
         |solve_to_wand H1
         |lazymatch m with
          | GSpatial => apply elim_modal_dummy
          | GModal => apply _ || fail "iSpecialize: goal not a modality"
          end
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
453 454
         |iFrame "∗ #"; apply tac_unlock ||
          fail "iSpecialize: premise cannot be solved by framing"
455
         |reflexivity]; iIntro H1; go H1 pats
456 457
    end in let pats := spec_pat.parse pat in go H pats.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
458
(* The argument [p] denotes whether the conclusion of the specialized term is
459 460 461
persistent. If so, one can use all spatial hypotheses for both proving the
premises and the remaning goal. The argument [p] can either be a Boolean or an
introduction pattern, which will be coerced into [true] when it solely contains
462 463 464 465 466
`#` or `%` patterns at the top-level.

In case the specialization pattern in [t] states that the modality of the goal
should be kept for one of the premises (i.e. [>[H1 .. Hn]] is used) then [p]
defaults to [false] (i.e. spatial hypotheses are not preserved). *)
467
Tactic Notation "iSpecializeCore" open_constr(t) "as" constr(p) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
468
  let p := intro_pat_persistent p in
469 470
  let t :=
    match type of t with string => constr:(ITrm t hnil "") | _ => t end in
471 472
  lazymatch t with
  | ITrm ?H ?xs ?pat =>
473
    let pat := spec_pat.parse pat in
474 475
    lazymatch type of H with
    | string =>
476
      lazymatch eval compute in (p && negb (existsb spec_pat_modal pat)) with
477 478
      | true =>
         eapply tac_specialize_persistent_helper with _ H _ _ _;
479
           [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H "not found"
480
           |iSpecializeArgs H xs; iSpecializePat H pat; last (iExact H)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
481 482 483
           |apply _ ||
            let Q := match goal with |- PersistentP ?Q => Q end in
            fail "iSpecialize:" Q "not persistent"
484
           |env_reflexivity|(* goal *)]
485
      | false => iSpecializeArgs H xs; iSpecializePat H pat
486 487
      end
    | _ => fail "iSpecialize:" H "should be a hypothesis, use iPoseProof instead"
488
    end
489
  | _ => fail "iSpecialize:" t "should be a proof mode term"
490
  end.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
491

492
Tactic Notation "iSpecialize" open_constr(t) :=
493 494 495
  iSpecializeCore t as false.
Tactic Notation "iSpecialize" open_constr(t) "as" "#" :=
  iSpecializeCore t as true.
496

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
497
(** * Pose proof *)
498 499
(* The tactic [iIntoValid] tactic solves a goal [uPred_valid Q]. The
arguments [t] is a Coq term whose type is of the following shape:
500

501
- [∀ (x_1 : A_1) .. (x_n : A_n), uPred_valid Q]
502
- [∀ (x_1 : A_1) .. (x_n : A_n), P1 ⊢ P2], in which case [Q] becomes [P1 -∗ P2]
503 504 505 506
- [∀ (x_1 : A_1) .. (x_n : A_n), P1 ⊣⊢ P2], in which case [Q] becomes [P1 ↔ P2]

The tactic instantiates each dependent argument [x_i] with an evar and generates
a goal [P] for non-dependent arguments [x_i : P]. *)
507
Tactic Notation "iIntoValid" open_constr(t) :=
508
  let rec go t :=
509 510
    let tT := type of t in
    lazymatch eval hnf in tT with
511 512
    | True  _ => apply t
    | _  _ => apply (uPred.entails_wand _ _ t)
513 514
    (* need to use the unfolded version of [⊣⊢] due to the hnf *)
    | uPred_equiv' _ _ => apply (uPred.equiv_iff _ _ t)
515
    | ?P  ?Q => let H := fresh in assert P as H; [|go uconstr:(t H); clear H]
516 517 518 519 520
    |  _ : ?T, _ =>
       (* Put [T] inside an [id] to avoid TC inference from being invoked. *)
       (* This is a workarround for Coq bug #4969. *)
       let e := fresh in evar (e:id T);
       let e' := eval unfold e in e in clear e; go (t e')
521 522
    end in
  go t.
523

524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538
(* The tactic [tac] is called with a temporary fresh name [H]. The argument
[lazy_tc] denotes whether type class inference on the premises of [lem] should
be performed before (if false) or after (if true) [tac H] is called. *)
Tactic Notation "iPoseProofCore" open_constr(lem)
    "as" constr(p) constr(lazy_tc) tactic(tac) :=
  try iStartProof;
  let Htmp := iFresh in
  let t :=
    lazymatch lem with ITrm ?t ?xs ?pat => t | _ => lem end in
  let spec_tac _ :=
    lazymatch lem with
    | ITrm ?t ?xs ?pat => iSpecializeCore (ITrm Htmp xs pat) as p
    | _ => idtac
    end in
  let go goal_tac :=
539 540 541
    lazymatch type of t with
    | string =>
       eapply tac_pose_proof_hyp with _ _ t _ Htmp _;
542 543
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iPoseProof:" t "not found"
         |env_reflexivity || fail "iPoseProof:" Htmp "not fresh"
544
         |goal_tac ()]
545 546
    | _ =>
       eapply tac_pose_proof with _ Htmp _; (* (j:=H) *)
547
         [iIntoValid t
548
         |env_reflexivity || fail "iPoseProof:" Htmp "not fresh"
549
         |goal_tac ()]
550
    end;
551 552 553 554
    try (apply _) in
  lazymatch eval compute in lazy_tc with
  | true => go ltac:(fun _ => spec_tac (); last (tac Htmp))
  | false => go spec_tac; last (tac Htmp)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
555 556 557
  end.

(** * Apply *)
558
Tactic Notation "iApply" open_constr(lem) :=
559 560
  let rec go H := first
    [eapply tac_apply with _ H _ _ _;
561
      [env_reflexivity
562 563
      |apply _
      |lazy beta (* reduce betas created by instantiation *)]
564
    |iSpecializePat H "[]"; last go H] in
565 566 567
  iPoseProofCore lem as false true (fun H => first
    [iExact H
    |go H
568 569 570
    |lazymatch iTypeOf H with
     | Some (_,?Q) => fail 1 "iApply: cannot apply" Q
     end]).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
571 572

(** * Revert *)
573
Local Tactic Notation "iForallRevert" ident(x) :=
574 575 576 577 578 579
  let err x :=
    intros x;
    iMatchHyp (fun H P =>
      lazymatch P with
      | context [x] => fail 2 "iRevert:" x "is used in hypothesis" H
      end) in
580 581
  let A := type of x in
  lazymatch type of A with
582 583 584
  | Prop => revert x; first [apply tac_pure_revert|err x]
  | _ => revert x; first [apply tac_forall_revert|err x]
  end.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
585 586

Tactic Notation "iRevert" constr(Hs) :=
587 588
  let rec go Hs :=
    lazymatch Hs with
589
    | [] => idtac
590 591 592 593 594
    | ESelPure :: ?Hs =>
       repeat match goal with x : _ |- _ => revert x end;
       go Hs
    | ESelName _ ?H :: ?Hs =>
       eapply tac_revert with _ H _ _; (* (i:=H2) *)
595
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iRevert:" H "not found"
596
         |env_cbv; go Hs]
597
    end in
598
  iElaborateSelPat Hs go.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
599

600
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ")" :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
601
  iForallRevert x1.
602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x2; iRevert ( x1 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x3; iRevert ( x1 x2 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x4; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x5; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ident(x6) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x6; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ident(x6) ident(x7) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x7; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ident(x6) ident(x7) ident(x8) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x8; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 ).

Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4) ")"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
628
    constr(Hs) :=
629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ident(x6) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ident(x6) ident(x7) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ident(x6) ident(x7) ident(x8) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 x8 ).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
642 643 644

(** * Disjunction *)
Tactic Notation "iLeft" :=
645
  iStartProof;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
646
  eapply tac_or_l;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
647 648 649 650
    [apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- FromOr ?P _ _ => P end in
     fail "iLeft:" P "not a disjunction"
    |].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
651
Tactic Notation "iRight" :=
652
  iStartProof;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
653
  eapply tac_or_r;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
654 655 656 657
    [apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- FromOr ?P _ _ => P end in
     fail "iRight:" P "not a disjunction"
    |].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
658

659
Local Tactic Notation "iOrDestruct" constr(H) "as" constr(H1) constr(H2) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
660
  eapply tac_or_destruct with _ _ H _ H1 H2 _ _ _; (* (i:=H) (j1:=H1) (j2:=H2) *)
661
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iOrDestruct:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
662 663 664
    |apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- IntoOr ?P _ _ => P end in
     fail "iOrDestruct: cannot destruct" P
665
    |env_reflexivity || fail "iOrDestruct:" H1 "not fresh"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
666 667
    |env_reflexivity || fail "iOrDestruct:" H2 "not fresh"
    | |].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
668 669 670

(** * Conjunction and separating conjunction *)
Tactic Notation "iSplit" :=
671
  iStartProof;
672 673 674
  lazymatch goal with
  | |- _  _ =>
    eapply tac_and_split;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
675
      [apply _ ||
676
       let P := match goal with |- FromAnd _ ?P _ _ => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
677
       fail "iSplit:" P "not a conjunction"| |]
678
  end.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
679 680

Tactic Notation "iSplitL" constr(Hs) :=
681
  iStartProof;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
682 683
  let Hs := words Hs in
  eapply tac_sep_split with _ _ false Hs _ _; (* (js:=Hs) *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
684
    [apply _ ||
685
     let P := match goal with |- FromAnd _ ?P _ _ => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
686
     fail "iSplitL:" P "not a separating conjunction"
687 688
    |env_reflexivity ||
     let Hs := iMissingHyps Hs in
689
     fail "iSplitL: hypotheses" Hs "not found"
690 691
    | |].

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
692
Tactic Notation "iSplitR" constr(Hs) :=
693
  iStartProof;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
694 695
  let Hs := words Hs in
  eapply tac_sep_split with _ _ true Hs _ _; (* (js:=Hs) *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
696
    [apply _ ||
697
     let P := match goal with |- FromAnd _ ?P _ _ => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
698
     fail "iSplitR:" P "not a separating conjunction"
699 700
    |env_reflexivity ||
     let Hs := iMissingHyps Hs in
701
     fail "iSplitR: hypotheses" Hs "not found"
702
    | |].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
703 704 705 706

Tactic Notation "iSplitL" := iSplitR "".
Tactic Notation "iSplitR" := iSplitL "".

707 708
Local Tactic Notation "iAndDestruct" constr(H) "as" constr(H1) constr(H2) :=
  eapply tac_and_destruct with _ H _ H1 H2 _ _ _; (* (i:=H) (j1:=H1) (j2:=H2) *)
709
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iAndDestruct:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
710 711 712
    |apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- IntoAnd _ ?P _ _ => P end in
     fail "iAndDestruct: cannot destruct" P
713
    |env_reflexivity || fail "iAndDestruct:" H1 "or" H2 " not fresh"|].
714 715 716

Local Tactic Notation "iAndDestructChoice" constr(H) "as" constr(lr) constr(H') :=
  eapply tac_and_destruct_choice with _ H _ lr H' _ _ _;
717
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iAndDestructChoice:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
718 719 720
    |apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- IntoAnd _ ?P _ _ => P end in
     fail "iAndDestructChoice: cannot destruct" P
721
    |env_reflexivity || fail "iAndDestructChoice:" H' " not fresh"|].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
722

723 724 725 726
(** * Combinining hypotheses *)
Tactic Notation "iCombine" constr(Hs) "as" constr(H) :=
  let Hs := words Hs in
  eapply tac_combine with _ _ Hs _ _ H _;
727 728
    [env_reflexivity ||
     let Hs := iMissingHyps Hs in
729
     fail "iCombine: hypotheses" Hs "not found"
730
    |apply _
731
    |env_reflexivity || fail "iCombine:" H "not fresh"|].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
732

733 734 735
Tactic Notation "iCombine" constr(H1) constr(H2) "as" constr(H) :=
  iCombine [H1;H2] as H.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
736
(** * Existential *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
737
Tactic Notation "iExists" uconstr(x1) :=
738
  iStartProof;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
739
  eapply tac_exist;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
740 741 742
    [apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- FromExist ?P _ => P end in
     fail "iExists:" P "not an existential"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
743
    |cbv beta; eexists x1].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
744

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
745
Tactic Notation "iExists" uconstr(x1) "," uconstr(x2) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
746
  iExists x1; iExists x2.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
747
Tactic Notation "iExists" uconstr(x1) "," uconstr(x2) "," uconstr(x3) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
748
  iExists x1; iExists x2, x3.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
749 750
Tactic Notation "iExists" uconstr(x1) "," uconstr(x2) "," uconstr(x3) ","
    uconstr(x4) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
751
  iExists x1; iExists x2, x3, x4.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
752 753
Tactic Notation "iExists" uconstr(x1) "," uconstr(x2) "," uconstr(x3) ","
    uconstr(x4) "," uconstr(x5) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
754
  iExists x1; iExists x2, x3, x4, x5.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
755 756
Tactic Notation "iExists" uconstr(x1) "," uconstr(x2) "," uconstr(x3) ","
    uconstr(x4) "," uconstr(x5) "," uconstr(x6) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
757
  iExists x1; iExists x2, x3, x4, x5, x6.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
758 759
Tactic Notation "iExists" uconstr(x1) "," uconstr(x2) "," uconstr(x3) ","
    uconstr(x4) "," uconstr(x5) "," uconstr(x6) "," uconstr(x7) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
760
  iExists x1; iExists x2, x3, x4, x5, x6, x7.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
761 762 763
Tactic Notation "iExists" uconstr(x1) "," uconstr(x2) "," uconstr(x3) ","
    uconstr(x4) "," uconstr(x5) "," uconstr(x6) "," uconstr(x7) ","
    uconstr(x8) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
764 765
  iExists x1; iExists x2, x3, x4, x5, x6, x7, x8.

766 767
Local Tactic Notation "iExistDestruct" constr(H)
    "as" simple_intropattern(x) constr(Hx) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
768
  eapply tac_exist_destruct with H _ Hx _ _; (* (i:=H) (j:=Hx) *)
769
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iExistDestruct:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
770 771 772
    |apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- IntoExist ?P _ => P end in
     fail "iExistDestruct: cannot destruct" P|];
773 774
  let y := fresh in
  intros y; eexists; split;
775
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iExistDestruct:" Hx "not fresh"
776
    |revert y; intros x].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
777

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
778 779
(** * Always *)
Tactic Notation "iAlways":=
780
  iStartProof;
781
  apply tac_always_intro; env_cbv.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
782 783

(** * Later *)
784
Tactic Notation "iNext" open_constr(n) :=
785
  iStartProof;
786 787 788 789 790 791 792
  let P := match goal with |- _  ?P => P end in
  try lazymatch n with 0 => fail 1 "iNext: cannot strip 0 laters" end;
  eapply (tac_next _ _ n);
    [apply _ || fail "iNext:" P "does not contain" n "laters"
    |lazymatch goal with
     | |- IntoLaterNEnvs 0 _ _ => fail "iNext:" P "does not contain laters"
     | _ => apply _