tactics.v 79.3 KB
Newer Older
1
From iris.proofmode Require Import coq_tactics.
2
From iris.proofmode Require Import base intro_patterns spec_patterns sel_patterns.
3
From iris.base_logic Require Export base_logic big_op.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
4
From iris.proofmode Require Export classes notation.
5
From iris.proofmode Require Import class_instances.
6
From stdpp Require Import hlist pretty.
7
Set Default Proof Using "Type".
8
Export ident.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
9
10

Declare Reduction env_cbv := cbv [
11
  option_bind
12
  beq ascii_beq string_beq positive_beq ident_beq
13
14
  env_lookup env_lookup_delete env_delete env_app env_replace env_dom
  env_persistent env_spatial env_spatial_is_nil envs_dom
15
  envs_lookup envs_lookup_delete envs_delete envs_snoc envs_app
16
17
    envs_simple_replace envs_replace envs_split
    envs_clear_spatial envs_clear_persistent
18
    envs_split_go envs_split].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
19
20
Ltac env_cbv :=
  match goal with |- ?u => let v := eval env_cbv in u in change v end.
21
Ltac env_reflexivity := env_cbv; exact eq_refl.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
22

23
(** * Misc *)
24
(* Tactic Notation tactics cannot return terms *)
25
Ltac iFresh :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
26
  lazymatch goal with
27
  |- envs_entails ?Δ _ =>
28
29
30
     (* [vm_compute fails] if any of the hypotheses in [Δ] contain evars, so
     first use [cbv] to compute the domain of [Δ] *)
     let Hs := eval cbv in (envs_dom Δ) in
31
32
33
34
35
36
     eval vm_compute in
       (IAnon (match Hs with
         | [] => 1
         | _ => 1 + foldr Pos.max 1 (omap (maybe IAnon) Hs)
         end))%positive
  | _ => constr:(IAnon 1)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
37
38
  end.

39
40
41
Ltac iMissingHyps Hs :=
  let Δ :=
    lazymatch goal with
42
    | |- envs_entails ?Δ _ => Δ
43
44
45
46
47
    | |- context[ envs_split _ _ ?Δ ] => Δ
    end in
  let Hhyps := eval env_cbv in (envs_dom Δ) in
  eval vm_compute in (list_difference Hs Hhyps).

48
Ltac iTypeOf H :=
49
  let Δ := match goal with |- envs_entails ?Δ _ => Δ end in
50
  eval env_cbv in (envs_lookup H Δ).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
51

52
Tactic Notation "iMatchHyp" tactic1(tac) :=
53
54
55
56
  match goal with
  | |- context[ environments.Esnoc _ ?x ?P ] => tac x P
  end.

57
Class AsValid {M} (φ : Prop) (P : uPred M) := as_valid : φ  P.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
58
59
Arguments AsValid {_} _%type _%I.

60
61
62
63
64
Lemma as_valid_1 (φ : Prop) {M} (P : uPred M) `{!AsValid φ P} : φ  P.
Proof. by apply as_valid. Qed.
Lemma as_valid_2 (φ : Prop) {M} (P : uPred M) `{!AsValid φ P} : P  φ.
Proof. by apply as_valid. Qed.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
Instance as_valid_valid {M} (P : uPred M) : AsValid (uPred_valid P) P | 0.
Proof. by rewrite /AsValid. Qed.

Instance as_valid_entails {M} (P Q : uPred M) : AsValid (P  Q) (P - Q) | 1.
Proof. split. apply uPred.entails_wand. apply uPred.wand_entails. Qed.

Instance as_valid_equiv {M} (P Q : uPred M) : AsValid (P  Q) (P  Q).
Proof. split. apply uPred.equiv_iff. apply uPred.iff_equiv. Qed.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
74
(** * Start a proof *)
75
Ltac iStartProof :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
76
  lazymatch goal with
77
  | |- envs_entails _ _ => idtac
78
79
80
  | |- ?φ => eapply (as_valid_2 φ);
               [apply _ || fail "iStartProof: not a uPred"
               |apply tac_adequate]
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
81
82
83
84
85
  end.

(** * Context manipulation *)
Tactic Notation "iRename" constr(H1) "into" constr(H2) :=
  eapply tac_rename with _ H1 H2 _ _; (* (i:=H1) (j:=H2) *)
86
87
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iRename:" H1 "not found"
    |env_reflexivity || fail "iRename:" H2 "not fresh"|].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
88

89
90
Local Inductive esel_pat :=
  | ESelPure
91
  | ESelIdent : bool  ident  esel_pat.
92

93
Ltac iElaborateSelPat pat :=
94
95
  let rec go pat Δ Hs :=
    lazymatch pat with
96
    | [] => eval cbv in Hs
97
98
99
100
    | SelPure :: ?pat => go pat Δ (ESelPure :: Hs)
    | SelPersistent :: ?pat =>
       let Hs' := eval env_cbv in (env_dom (env_persistent Δ)) in
       let Δ' := eval env_cbv in (envs_clear_persistent Δ) in
101
       go pat Δ' ((ESelIdent true <$> Hs') ++ Hs)
102
103
104
    | SelSpatial :: ?pat =>
       let Hs' := eval env_cbv in (env_dom (env_spatial Δ)) in
       let Δ' := eval env_cbv in (envs_clear_spatial Δ) in
105
106
       go pat Δ' ((ESelIdent false <$> Hs') ++ Hs)
    | SelIdent ?H :: ?pat =>
107
       lazymatch eval env_cbv in (envs_lookup_delete H Δ) with
108
       | Some (?p,_,?Δ') => go pat Δ' (ESelIdent p H :: Hs)
109
110
111
112
       | None => fail "iElaborateSelPat:" H "not found"
       end
    end in
  lazymatch goal with
113
  | |- envs_entails ?Δ _ =>
114
115
116
    let pat := sel_pat.parse pat in go pat Δ (@nil esel_pat)
  end.

117
118
119
120
Local Ltac iClearHyp H :=
  eapply tac_clear with _ H _ _; (* (i:=H) *)
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iClear:" H "not found"|].

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
121
122
Tactic Notation "iClear" constr(Hs) :=
  let rec go Hs :=
123
    lazymatch Hs with
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
124
    | [] => idtac
125
    | ESelPure :: ?Hs => clear; go Hs
126
    | ESelIdent _ ?H :: ?Hs => iClearHyp H; go Hs
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
127
    end in
128
  let Hs := iElaborateSelPat Hs in go Hs.
129

130
131
Tactic Notation "iClear" "(" ident_list(xs) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iClear Hs; clear xs.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
132
133
134

(** * Assumptions *)
Tactic Notation "iExact" constr(H) :=
135
  eapply tac_assumption with H _ _; (* (i:=H) *)
136
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iExact:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
137
138
139
    |apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- FromAssumption _ ?P _ => P end in
     fail "iExact:" H ":" P "does not match goal"].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147

Tactic Notation "iAssumptionCore" :=
  let rec find Γ i P :=
    match Γ with
    | Esnoc ?Γ ?j ?Q => first [unify P Q; unify i j| find Γ i P]
    end in
  match goal with
  | |- envs_lookup ?i (Envs ?Γp ?Γs) = Some (_, ?P) =>
148
     first [is_evar i; fail 1 | env_reflexivity]
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
149
  | |- envs_lookup ?i (Envs ?Γp ?Γs) = Some (_, ?P) =>
150
     is_evar i; first [find Γp i P | find Γs i P]; env_reflexivity
151
  | |- envs_lookup_delete ?i (Envs ?Γp ?Γs) = Some (_, ?P, _) =>
152
     first [is_evar i; fail 1 | env_reflexivity]
153
  | |- envs_lookup_delete ?i (Envs ?Γp ?Γs) = Some (_, ?P, _) =>
154
     is_evar i; first [find Γp i P | find Γs i P]; env_reflexivity
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
155
  end.
156

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
157
Tactic Notation "iAssumption" :=
158
159
160
161
  let Hass := fresh in
  let rec find p Γ Q :=
    match Γ with
    | Esnoc ?Γ ?j ?P => first
162
       [pose proof (_ : FromAssumption p P Q) as Hass;
163
        apply (tac_assumption _ j p P); [env_reflexivity|apply Hass]
164
165
166
       |find p Γ Q]
    end in
  match goal with
167
  | |- envs_entails (Envs ?Γp ?Γs) ?Q =>
168
169
170
     first [find true Γp Q | find false Γs Q
           |fail "iAssumption:" Q "not found"]
  end.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
171
172
173
174
175

(** * False *)
Tactic Notation "iExFalso" := apply tac_ex_falso.

(** * Making hypotheses persistent or pure *)
176
Local Tactic Notation "iPersistent" constr(H) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
177
  eapply tac_persistent with _ H _ _ _; (* (i:=H) *)
178
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iPersistent:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
179
    |apply _ ||
180
     let Q := match goal with |- IntoPersistent _ ?Q _ => Q end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
181
     fail "iPersistent:" Q "not persistent"
182
    |env_reflexivity|].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
183

184
Local Tactic Notation "iPure" constr(H) "as" simple_intropattern(pat) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
185
  eapply tac_pure with _ H _ _ _; (* (i:=H1) *)
186
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iPure:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
187
188
189
    |apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- IntoPure ?P _ => P end in
     fail "iPure:" P "not pure"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
190
191
    |intros pat].

192
Tactic Notation "iPureIntro" :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
193
  iStartProof;
194
  eapply tac_pure_intro;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
195
196
197
198
    [apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- FromPure ?P _ => P end in
     fail "iPureIntro:" P "not pure"
    |].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
199

200
201
202
203
(** Framing *)
Local Ltac iFrameFinish :=
  lazy iota beta;
  try match goal with
204
  | |- envs_entails _ True => exact (uPred.pure_intro _ _ I)
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
  end.

Local Ltac iFramePure t :=
  let φ := type of t in
  eapply (tac_frame_pure _ _ _ _ t);
    [apply _ || fail "iFrame: cannot frame" φ
    |iFrameFinish].

Local Ltac iFrameHyp H :=
  eapply tac_frame with _ H _ _ _;
215
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iFrame:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
216
217
218
    |apply _ ||
     let R := match goal with |- Frame _ ?R _ _ => R end in
     fail "iFrame: cannot frame" R
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
    |iFrameFinish].

Local Ltac iFrameAnyPure :=
  repeat match goal with H : _ |- _ => iFramePure H end.

Local Ltac iFrameAnyPersistent :=
  let rec go Hs :=
    match Hs with [] => idtac | ?H :: ?Hs => repeat iFrameHyp H; go Hs end in
  match goal with
228
  | |- envs_entails ?Δ _ =>
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
     let Hs := eval cbv in (env_dom (env_persistent Δ)) in go Hs
  end.

Local Ltac iFrameAnySpatial :=
  let rec go Hs :=
    match Hs with [] => idtac | ?H :: ?Hs => try iFrameHyp H; go Hs end in
  match goal with
236
  | |- envs_entails ?Δ _ =>
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
     let Hs := eval cbv in (env_dom (env_spatial Δ)) in go Hs
  end.

Tactic Notation "iFrame" := iFrameAnySpatial.

Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 ).
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 ).
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 ).
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 ).
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) constr(t6) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 ).
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) constr(t6) constr(t7) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 t7 ).
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) constr(t6) constr(t7) constr(t8)")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 t7 t8 ).

Tactic Notation "iFrame" constr(Hs) :=
  let rec go Hs :=
265
    lazymatch Hs with
266
    | [] => idtac
267
268
269
    | SelPure :: ?Hs => iFrameAnyPure; go Hs
    | SelPersistent :: ?Hs => iFrameAnyPersistent; go Hs
    | SelSpatial :: ?Hs => iFrameAnySpatial; go Hs
270
    | SelIdent ?H :: ?Hs => iFrameHyp H; go Hs
271
    end
272
  in let Hs := sel_pat.parse Hs in go Hs.
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 ) Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 ) Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4) ")"
    constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 ) Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 ) Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) constr(t6) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 ) Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) constr(t6) constr(t7) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 t7 ) Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) constr(t6) constr(t7) constr(t8)")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 t7 t8 ) Hs.

295
296
297
(** * Basic introduction tactics *)
Local Tactic Notation "iIntro" "(" simple_intropattern(x) ")" :=
  try iStartProof;
298
  lazymatch goal with
299
  | |- envs_entails _ _ =>
300
    eapply tac_forall_intro;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
301
      [apply _ ||
302
303
304
305
306
       let P := match goal with |- FromForall ?P _ => P end in
       fail "iIntro: cannot turn" P "into a universal quantifier"
      |lazy beta; intros x]
  | |- _ => intros x
  end.
307
308
309
310
311
312

Local Tactic Notation "iIntro" constr(H) :=
  iStartProof;
  first
  [ (* (?Q → _) *)
    eapply tac_impl_intro with _ H; (* (i:=H) *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
313
      [env_cbv; apply _ ||
314
       let P := lazymatch goal with |- Persistent ?P => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
315
316
       fail 1 "iIntro: introducing non-persistent" H ":" P
              "into non-empty spatial context"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
317
318
      |env_reflexivity || fail "iIntro:" H "not fresh"
      |]
319
320
  | (* (_ -∗ _) *)
    eapply tac_wand_intro with _ H; (* (i:=H) *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
321
322
      [env_reflexivity || fail 1 "iIntro:" H "not fresh"
      |]
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
  | fail 1 "iIntro: nothing to introduce" ].

Local Tactic Notation "iIntro" "#" constr(H) :=
  iStartProof;
  first
  [ (* (?P → _) *)
    eapply tac_impl_intro_persistent with _ H _; (* (i:=H) *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
330
      [apply _ || 
331
       let P := match goal with |- IntoPersistent _ ?P _ => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
332
333
334
       fail 1 "iIntro: " P " not persistent"
      |env_reflexivity || fail 1 "iIntro:" H "not fresh"
      |]
335
336
  | (* (?P -∗ _) *)
    eapply tac_wand_intro_persistent with _ H _; (* (i:=H) *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
337
      [apply _ || 
338
       let P := match goal with |- IntoPersistent _ ?P _ => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
339
340
341
       fail 1 "iIntro: " P " not persistent"
      |env_reflexivity || fail 1 "iIntro:" H "not fresh"
      |]
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
  | fail 1 "iIntro: nothing to introduce" ].

Local Tactic Notation "iIntro" "_" :=
  try iStartProof;
  first
  [ (* (?Q → _) *) apply tac_impl_intro_drop
  | (* (_ -∗ _) *) apply tac_wand_intro_drop
  | (* (∀ _, _) *) iIntro (_)
  | fail 1 "iIntro: nothing to introduce" ].

Local Tactic Notation "iIntroForall" :=
  try iStartProof;
  lazymatch goal with
  | |-  _, ?P => fail
  | |-  _, _ => intro
357
  | |- envs_entails _ ( x : _, _) => let x' := fresh x in iIntro (x')
358
359
360
361
362
  end.
Local Tactic Notation "iIntro" :=
  try iStartProof;
  lazymatch goal with
  | |- _  ?P => intro
363
364
  | |- envs_entails _ (_ - _) => iIntro (?) || let H := iFresh in iIntro #H || iIntro H
  | |- envs_entails _ (_  _) => iIntro (?) || let H := iFresh in iIntro #H || iIntro H
365
366
  end.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
367
(** * Specialize *)
368
369
370
371
372
Record iTrm {X As} :=
  ITrm { itrm : X ; itrm_vars : hlist As ; itrm_hyps : string }.
Arguments ITrm {_ _} _ _ _.

Notation "( H $! x1 .. xn )" :=
373
  (ITrm H (hcons x1 .. (hcons xn hnil) ..) "") (at level 0, x1, xn at level 9).
374
Notation "( H $! x1 .. xn 'with' pat )" :=
375
  (ITrm H (hcons x1 .. (hcons xn hnil) ..) pat) (at level 0, x1, xn at level 9).
376
377
Notation "( H 'with' pat )" := (ITrm H hnil pat) (at level 0).

378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
(*
There is some hacky stuff going on here (most probably there is a Coq bug).
Holes -- like unresolved type class instances -- in the argument `xs` are
resolved at arbitrary moments. It seems that tactics like `apply`, `split` and
`eexists` trigger type class search to resolve these holes. To avoid TC being
triggered too eagerly, this tactic uses `refine` at various places instead of
`apply`.

TODO: Investigate what really is going on. Is there a related to Cog bug #5752?
When should holes in an `open_constr` be resolved?
*)
389
Local Tactic Notation "iSpecializeArgs" constr(H) open_constr(xs) :=
390
  let rec go xs :=
391
    lazymatch xs with
392
    | hnil => apply id (* Finally, trigger TC *)
393
    | hcons ?x ?xs =>
394
       eapply tac_forall_specialize with _ H _ _ _; (* (i:=H) (a:=x) *)
395
396
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H "not found"
         |typeclasses eauto ||
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
397
          let P := match goal with |- IntoForall ?P _ => P end in
398
399
400
401
          fail "iSpecialize: cannot instantiate" P "with" x
         |lazymatch goal with (* Force [A] in [ex_intro] to deal with coercions. *)
          | |-  _ : ?A, _ => refine (@ex_intro A _ x (conj _ _))
          end; [env_reflexivity|go xs]]
402
403
    end in
  go xs.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
404

405
Local Tactic Notation "iSpecializePat" open_constr(H) constr(pat) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
406
  let solve_to_wand H1 :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
407
    apply _ ||
408
    let P := match goal with |- IntoWand _ ?P _ _ => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
409
    fail "iSpecialize:" P "not an implication/wand" in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
410
411
412
  let rec go H1 pats :=
    lazymatch pats with
    | [] => idtac
413
    | SForall :: ?pats =>
Ralf Jung's avatar
Ralf Jung committed
414
       idtac "[IPM] The * specialization pattern is deprecated because it is applied implicitly.";
415
       go H1 pats
416
    | SIdent ?H2 :: ?pats =>
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
417
       eapply tac_specialize with _ _ H2 _ H1 _ _ _ _; (* (j:=H1) (i:=H2) *)
418
419
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H2 "not found"
         |env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H1 "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
420
         |apply _ ||
421
422
          let P := match goal with |- IntoWand _ ?P ?Q _ => P end in
          let Q := match goal with |- IntoWand _ ?P ?Q _ => Q end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
423
          fail "iSpecialize: cannot instantiate" P "with" Q
424
         |env_reflexivity|go H1 pats]
425
426
    | SPureGoal ?d :: ?pats =>
       eapply tac_specialize_assert_pure with _ H1 _ _ _ _ _;
427
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H1 "not found"
428
         |solve_to_wand H1
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
429
430
431
         |apply _ ||
          let Q := match goal with |- FromPure ?Q _ => Q end in
          fail "iSpecialize:" Q "not pure"
432
         |env_reflexivity
433
         |done_if d (*goal*)
434
         |go H1 pats]
435
436
    | SGoal (SpecGoal GPersistent false ?Hs_frame [] ?d) :: ?pats =>
       eapply tac_specialize_assert_persistent with _ _ H1 _ _ _ _;
437
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H1 "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
438
         |solve_to_wand H1
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
439
         |apply _ ||
440
          let Q := match goal with |- Persistent ?Q => Q end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
441
          fail "iSpecialize:" Q "not persistent"
442
         |env_reflexivity
443
         |iFrame Hs_frame; done_if d (*goal*)
444
         |go H1 pats]
445
446
447
    | SGoal (SpecGoal GPersistent _ _ _ _) :: ?pats =>
       fail "iSpecialize: cannot select hypotheses for persistent premise"
    | SGoal (SpecGoal ?m ?lr ?Hs_frame ?Hs ?d) :: ?pats =>
448
       let Hs' := eval cbv in (if lr then Hs else Hs_frame ++ Hs) in
449
       eapply tac_specialize_assert with _ _ _ H1 _ lr Hs' _ _ _ _;
450
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H1 "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
451
         |solve_to_wand H1
452
453
454
         |lazymatch m with
          | GSpatial => apply elim_modal_dummy
          | GModal => apply _ || fail "iSpecialize: goal not a modality"
455
          end
456
457
         |env_reflexivity ||
          let Hs' := iMissingHyps Hs' in
458
          fail "iSpecialize: hypotheses" Hs' "not found"
459
         |iFrame Hs_frame; done_if d (*goal*)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
460
         |go H1 pats]
461
462
    | SAutoFrame GPersistent :: ?pats =>
       eapply tac_specialize_assert_persistent with _ _ H1 _ _ _ _;
463
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H1 "not found"
464
         |solve_to_wand H1
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
465
         |apply _ ||
466
          let Q := match goal with |- Persistent ?Q => Q end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
467
          fail "iSpecialize:" Q "not persistent"
468
         |env_reflexivity
469
470
471
472
         |solve [iFrame "∗ #"]
         |go H1 pats]
    | SAutoFrame ?m :: ?pats =>
       eapply tac_specialize_frame with _ H1 _ _ _ _ _ _;
473
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H1 "not found"
474
475
476
477
478
         |solve_to_wand H1
         |lazymatch m with
          | GSpatial => apply elim_modal_dummy
          | GModal => apply _ || fail "iSpecialize: goal not a modality"
          end
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
479
480
         |iFrame "∗ #"; apply tac_unlock ||
          fail "iSpecialize: premise cannot be solved by framing"
481
         |reflexivity]; iIntro H1; go H1 pats
482
483
    end in let pats := spec_pat.parse pat in go H pats.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
484
(* The argument [p] denotes whether the conclusion of the specialized term is
485
486
487
persistent. If so, one can use all spatial hypotheses for both proving the
premises and the remaning goal. The argument [p] can either be a Boolean or an
introduction pattern, which will be coerced into [true] when it solely contains
488
489
490
491
492
`#` or `%` patterns at the top-level.

In case the specialization pattern in [t] states that the modality of the goal
should be kept for one of the premises (i.e. [>[H1 .. Hn]] is used) then [p]
defaults to [false] (i.e. spatial hypotheses are not preserved). *)
493
Tactic Notation "iSpecializeCore" open_constr(t) "as" constr(p) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
494
  let p := intro_pat_persistent p in
495
  let t :=
496
497
498
499
500
    match type of t with
    | string => constr:(ITrm (INamed t) hnil "")
    | ident => constr:(ITrm t hnil "")
    | _ => t
    end in
501
502
  lazymatch t with
  | ITrm ?H ?xs ?pat =>
503
    let pat := spec_pat.parse pat in
504
    let H := lazymatch type of H with string => constr:(INamed H) | _ => H end in
505
    lazymatch type of H with
506
    | ident =>
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
      (* The lemma [tac_specialize_persistent_helper] allows one to use all
      spatial hypotheses for both proving the premises of the lemma we
      specialize as well as those of the remaining goal. We can only use it when
      the result of the specialization is persistent, and no modality is
      eliminated. As an optimization, we do not use this when only universal
      quantifiers are instantiated. *)
      lazymatch eval compute in
        (bool_decide (pat  []) && p && negb (existsb spec_pat_modal pat)) with
515
516
      | true =>
         eapply tac_specialize_persistent_helper with _ H _ _ _;
517
           [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H "not found"
518
           |iSpecializeArgs H xs; iSpecializePat H pat; last (iExact H)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
519
           |apply _ ||
520
            let Q := match goal with |- Persistent ?Q => Q end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
521
            fail "iSpecialize:" Q "not persistent"
522
           |env_reflexivity|(* goal *)]
523
      | false => iSpecializeArgs H xs; iSpecializePat H pat
524
525
      end
    | _ => fail "iSpecialize:" H "should be a hypothesis, use iPoseProof instead"
526
    end
527
  | _ => fail "iSpecialize:" t "should be a proof mode term"
528
  end.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
529

530
Tactic Notation "iSpecialize" open_constr(t) :=
531
532
533
  iSpecializeCore t as false.
Tactic Notation "iSpecialize" open_constr(t) "as" "#" :=
  iSpecializeCore t as true.
534

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
535
(** * Pose proof *)
536
537
(* The tactic [iIntoValid] tactic solves a goal [uPred_valid Q]. The
arguments [t] is a Coq term whose type is of the following shape:
538

539
- [∀ (x_1 : A_1) .. (x_n : A_n), uPred_valid Q]
540
- [∀ (x_1 : A_1) .. (x_n : A_n), P1 ⊢ P2], in which case [Q] becomes [P1 -∗ P2]
541
542
543
544
- [∀ (x_1 : A_1) .. (x_n : A_n), P1 ⊣⊢ P2], in which case [Q] becomes [P1 ↔ P2]

The tactic instantiates each dependent argument [x_i] with an evar and generates
a goal [P] for non-dependent arguments [x_i : P]. *)
545
Tactic Notation "iIntoValid" open_constr(t) :=
546
  let rec go t :=
547
    let tT := type of t in
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
    lazymatch eval hnf in tT with
    | ?P  ?Q => let H := fresh in assert P as H; [|go uconstr:(t H); clear H]
    |  _ : ?T, _ =>
      (* Put [T] inside an [id] to avoid TC inference from being invoked. *)
      (* This is a workarround for Coq bug #4969. *)
      let e := fresh in evar (e:id T);
      let e' := eval unfold e in e in clear e; go (t e')
    | _ =>
556
557
      let tT' := eval cbv zeta in tT in apply (as_valid_1 tT');
        [apply _ || fail "iPoseProof: not a uPred"|exact t]
558
    end in
559
  go t.
560

561
562
563
564
565
566
567
(* The tactic [tac] is called with a temporary fresh name [H]. The argument
[lazy_tc] denotes whether type class inference on the premises of [lem] should
be performed before (if false) or after (if true) [tac H] is called. *)
Tactic Notation "iPoseProofCore" open_constr(lem)
    "as" constr(p) constr(lazy_tc) tactic(tac) :=
  try iStartProof;
  let Htmp := iFresh in
568
569
  let t := lazymatch lem with ITrm ?t ?xs ?pat => t | _ => lem end in
  let t := lazymatch type of t with string => constr:(INamed t) | _ => t end in
570
571
572
573
574
575
  let spec_tac _ :=
    lazymatch lem with
    | ITrm ?t ?xs ?pat => iSpecializeCore (ITrm Htmp xs pat) as p
    | _ => idtac
    end in
  let go goal_tac :=
576
    lazymatch type of t with
577
    | ident =>
578
       eapply tac_pose_proof_hyp with _ _ t _ Htmp _;
579
580
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iPoseProof:" t "not found"
         |env_reflexivity || fail "iPoseProof:" Htmp "not fresh"
581
         |goal_tac ()]
582
583
    | _ =>
       eapply tac_pose_proof with _ Htmp _; (* (j:=H) *)
584
         [iIntoValid t
585
         |env_reflexivity || fail "iPoseProof:" Htmp "not fresh"
586
         |goal_tac ()]
587
    end;
588
589
590
591
    try (apply _) in
  lazymatch eval compute in lazy_tc with
  | true => go ltac:(fun _ => spec_tac (); last (tac Htmp))
  | false => go spec_tac; last (tac Htmp)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
592
593
594
  end.

(** * Apply *)
595
Tactic Notation "iApplyHyp" constr(H) :=
596
597
  let rec go H := first
    [eapply tac_apply with _ H _ _ _;
598
      [env_reflexivity
599
600
      |apply _
      |lazy beta (* reduce betas created by instantiation *)]
601
    |iSpecializePat H "[]"; last go H] in
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
  iExact H ||
  go H ||
  lazymatch iTypeOf H with
  | Some (_,?Q) => fail "iApply: cannot apply" Q
  end.

Tactic Notation "iApply" open_constr(lem) :=
  iPoseProofCore lem as false true (fun H => iApplyHyp H).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
610
611

(** * Revert *)
612
Local Tactic Notation "iForallRevert" ident(x) :=
613
614
615
616
617
618
  let err x :=
    intros x;
    iMatchHyp (fun H P =>
      lazymatch P with
      | context [x] => fail 2 "iRevert:" x "is used in hypothesis" H
      end) in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
619
  iStartProof;
620
621
  let A := type of x in
  lazymatch type of A with
622
623
624
  | Prop => revert x; first [apply tac_pure_revert|err x]
  | _ => revert x; first [apply tac_forall_revert|err x]
  end.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
625
626

Tactic Notation "iRevert" constr(Hs) :=
627
628
  let rec go Hs :=
    lazymatch Hs with
629
    | [] => idtac
630
631
632
    | ESelPure :: ?Hs =>
       repeat match goal with x : _ |- _ => revert x end;
       go Hs
633
    | ESelIdent _ ?H :: ?Hs =>
634
       eapply tac_revert with _ H _ _; (* (i:=H2) *)
635
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iRevert:" H "not found"
636
         |env_cbv; go Hs]
637
    end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
638
  let Hs := iElaborateSelPat Hs in iStartProof; go Hs.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
639

640
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ")" :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
641
  iForallRevert x1.
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x2; iRevert ( x1 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x3; iRevert ( x1 x2 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x4; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x5; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ident(x6) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x6; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ident(x6) ident(x7) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x7; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ident(x6) ident(x7) ident(x8) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x8; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 ).

Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4) ")"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
668
    constr(Hs) :=
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ident(x6) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ident(x6) ident(x7) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ident(x6) ident(x7) ident(x8) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 x8 ).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
682
683
684

(** * Disjunction *)
Tactic Notation "iLeft" :=
685
  iStartProof;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
686
  eapply tac_or_l;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
687
688
689
690
    [apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- FromOr ?P _ _ => P end in
     fail "iLeft:" P "not a disjunction"
    |].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
691
Tactic Notation "iRight" :=
692
  iStartProof;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
693
  eapply tac_or_r;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
694
695
696
697
    [apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- FromOr ?P _ _ => P end in
     fail "iRight:" P "not a disjunction"
    |].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
698

699
Local Tactic Notation "iOrDestruct" constr(H) "as" constr(H1) constr(H2) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
700
  eapply tac_or_destruct with _ _ H _ H1 H2 _ _ _; (* (i:=H) (j1:=H1) (j2:=H2) *)
701
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iOrDestruct:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
702
703
704
    |apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- IntoOr ?P _ _ => P end in
     fail "iOrDestruct: cannot destruct" P
705
    |env_reflexivity || fail "iOrDestruct:" H1 "not fresh"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
706
707
    |env_reflexivity || fail "iOrDestruct:" H2 "not fresh"
    | |].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
708
709
710

(** * Conjunction and separating conjunction *)
Tactic Notation "iSplit" :=
711
  iStartProof;
712
713
714
715
  eapply tac_and_split;
    [apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- FromAnd _ ?P _ _ => P end in
     fail "iSplit:" P "not a conjunction"| |].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
716
717

Tactic Notation "iSplitL" constr(Hs) :=
718
  iStartProof;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
719
  let Hs := words Hs in
720
  let Hs := eval vm_compute in (INamed <$> Hs) in
721
  eapply tac_sep_split with _ _ Left Hs _ _; (* (js:=Hs) *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
722
    [apply _ ||
723
     let P := match goal with |- FromAnd _ ?P _ _ => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
724
     fail "iSplitL:" P "not a separating conjunction"
725
726
    |env_reflexivity ||
     let Hs := iMissingHyps Hs in
727
     fail "iSplitL: hypotheses" Hs "not found"
728
729
    | |].

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
730
Tactic Notation "iSplitR" constr(Hs) :=
731
  iStartProof;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
732
  let Hs := words Hs in
733
  let Hs := eval vm_compute in (INamed <$> Hs) in
734
  eapply tac_sep_split with _ _ Right Hs _ _; (* (js:=Hs) *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
735
    [apply _ ||
736
     let P := match goal with |- FromAnd _ ?P _ _ => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
737
     fail "iSplitR:" P "not a separating conjunction"
738
739
    |env_reflexivity ||
     let Hs := iMissingHyps Hs in
740
     fail "iSplitR: hypotheses" Hs "not found"
741
    | |].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
742
743
744
745

Tactic Notation "iSplitL" := iSplitR "".
Tactic Notation "iSplitR" := iSplitL "".

746
747
Local Tactic Notation "iAndDestruct" constr(H) "as" constr(H1) constr(H2) :=
  eapply tac_and_destruct with _ H _ H1 H2 _ _ _; (* (i:=H) (j1:=H1) (j2:=H2) *)
748
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iAndDestruct:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
749
750
751
    |apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- IntoAnd _ ?P _ _ => P end in
     fail "iAndDestruct: cannot destruct" P
752
    |env_reflexivity || fail "iAndDestruct:" H1 "or" H2 " not fresh"|].
753

754
755
Local Tactic Notation "iAndDestructChoice" constr(H) "as" constr(d) constr(H') :=
  eapply tac_and_destruct_choice with _ H _ d H' _ _ _;
756
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iAndDestructChoice:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
757
758
759
    |apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- IntoAnd _ ?P _ _ => P end in
     fail "iAndDestructChoice: cannot destruct" P
760
    |env_reflexivity || fail "iAndDestructChoice:" H' " not fresh"|].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
761

762
763
764
(** * Combinining hypotheses *)
Tactic Notation "iCombine" constr(Hs) "as" constr(H) :=
  let Hs := words Hs in
765
  let Hs := eval vm_compute in (INamed <$> Hs) in
766
  eapply tac_combine with _ _ Hs _ _ H _;
767
768
    [env_reflexivity ||
     let Hs := iMissingHyps Hs in
769
     fail "iCombine: hypotheses" Hs "not found"
770
    |apply _
771
    |env_reflexivity || fail "iCombine:" H "not fresh"|].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
772

773
774
775
Tactic Notation "iCombine" constr(H1) constr(H2) "as" constr(H) :=
  iCombine [H1;H2] as H.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
776
(** * Existential *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
777
Tactic Notation "iExists" uconstr(x1) :=
778
  iStartProof;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
779
  eapply tac_exist;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
780
781
782
    [apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- FromExist ?P _ => P end in
     fail "iExists:" P "not an existential"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
783
    |cbv beta; eexists x1].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
784

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
785
Tactic Notation "iExists" uconstr(x1) "," uconstr(x2) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
786
  iExists x1; iExists x2.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
787
Tactic Notation "iExists" uconstr(x1) "," uconstr(x2) "," uconstr(x3) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
788
  iExists x1; iExists x2, x3.