Skip to content
Projects
Groups
Snippets
Help
Loading...
Help
Support
Submit feedback
Contribute to GitLab
Sign in / Register
Toggle navigation
P
PROSA  Formally Proven Schedulability Analysis
Project
Project
Details
Activity
Releases
Cycle Analytics
Repository
Repository
Files
Commits
Branches
Tags
Contributors
Graph
Compare
Charts
Issues
0
Issues
0
List
Boards
Labels
Milestones
Merge Requests
1
Merge Requests
1
CI / CD
CI / CD
Pipelines
Jobs
Schedules
Charts
Wiki
Wiki
Snippets
Snippets
Members
Members
Collapse sidebar
Close sidebar
Activity
Graph
Charts
Create a new issue
Jobs
Commits
Issue Boards
Open sidebar
Marco Maida
PROSA  Formally Proven Schedulability Analysis
Commits
0ac14e20
Commit
0ac14e20
authored
Sep 24, 2019
by
Sergey Bozhko
Committed by
Björn Brandenburg
Sep 24, 2019
Browse files
Options
Browse Files
Download
Email Patches
Plain Diff
Shorten a few long proofs
parent
4db8d20a
Pipeline
#20638
passed with stages
in 3 minutes and 41 seconds
Changes
4
Pipelines
1
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Sidebyside
Showing
4 changed files
with
44 additions
and
71 deletions
+44
71
knownlongproofs.json
scripts/knownlongproofs.json
+0
9
list.v
util/list.v
+26
28
step_function.v
util/step_function.v
+13
20
sum.v
util/sum.v
+5
14
No files found.
scripts/knownlongproofs.json
View file @
0ac14e20
...
...
@@ 300,15 +300,6 @@
},
"./util/div_mod.v"
:
{
"divSn_cases"
:
54
},
"./util/list.v"
:
{
"subseq_leq_size"
:
52
},
"./util/step_function.v"
:
{
"exists_intermediate_point"
:
43
},
"./util/sum.v"
:
{
"sum_majorant_eqn"
:
40
}
}
}
util/list.v
View file @
0ac14e20
...
...
@@ 748,6 +748,22 @@ End Order.
(* In this section we prove some additional lemmas about sequences. *)
Section
AdditionalLemmas
.
(* First, we prove that x ∈ xs implies that xs can be split
into two parts such that xs = xsl ++ [::x] ++ xsr. *)
Lemma
in_cat
:
forall
{
X
:
eqType
}
(
x
:
X
)
(
xs
:
list
X
),
x
\
in
xs
>
exists
xsl
xsr
,
xs
=
xsl
++
[::
x
]
++
xsr
.
Proof
.
intros
?
?
?
SUB
.
induction
xs
;
first
by
done
.
move
:
SUB
;
rewrite
in_cons
;
move
=>
/
orP
[/
eqP
EQ

IN
].

by
subst
;
exists
[::],
xs
.

feed
IHxs
;
first
by
done
.
clear
IN
;
move
:
IHxs
=>
[
xsl
[
xsr
EQ
]].
by
subst
;
exists
(
a
::
xsl
),
xsr
.
Qed
.
(* We define a local function max over lists using foldl and maxn. *)
Let
max
:=
foldl
maxn
0
.
...
...
@@ 769,41 +785,24 @@ Section AdditionalLemmas.
(* We prove that for any two sequences xs and ys the fact that xs is a subsequence
of ys implies that the size of xs is at most the size of ys. *)
Lemma
subseq_leq_size
:
forall
{
T
:
eqType
}
(
xs
ys
:
seq
T
),
forall
{
X
:
eqType
}
(
xs
ys
:
seq
X
),
uniq
xs
>
(
forall
x
,
x
\
in
xs
>
x
\
in
ys
)
>
size
xs
<=
size
ys
.
Proof
.
clear
;
intros
?
?
?
UNIQ
SUB
.
have
Lem
:
forall
a
ys
,
(
a
\
in
ys
)
>
exists
ysl
ysr
,
ys
=
ysl
++
[::
a
]
++
ysr
.
{
clear
;
intros
?
?
?
SUB
.
induction
ys
;
first
by
done
.
move
:
SUB
;
rewrite
in_cons
;
move
=>
/
orP
[/
eqP
EQ

IN
].

by
subst
;
exists
[::],
ys
.

feed
IHys
;
first
by
done
.
clear
IN
;
move
:
IHys
=>
[
ysl
[
ysr
EQ
]].
by
subst
;
exists
(
a0
::
ysl
),
ysr
.
}
have
EXm
:
exists
m
,
size
ys
<=
m
.
{
by
exists
(
size
ys
).
}
have
EXm
:
exists
m
,
size
ys
<=
m
;
first
by
exists
(
size
ys
).
move
:
EXm
=>
[
m
SIZEm
].
move
:
SIZEm
UNIQ
SUB
;
move
:
xs
ys
.
induction
m
.
{
intros
.
move
:
SIZEm
;
rewrite
leqn0
size_eq0
;
move
=>
/
eqP
SIZEm
;
subst
ys
.
induction
m
;
intros
.
{
move
:
SIZEm
;
rewrite
leqn0
size_eq0
;
move
=>
/
eqP
SIZEm
;
subst
ys
.
destruct
xs
;
first
by
done
.
specialize
(
SUB
s
).
feed
SUB
;
first
by
rewrite
in_cons
;
apply
/
orP
;
left
.
by
done
.
}
{
intros
.
destruct
xs
as
[

x
xs
];
first
by
done
.
specialize
(@
Lem
_
x
ys
).
feed
Lem
.
{
by
apply
SUB
;
rewrite
in_cons
;
apply
/
orP
;
left
.
}
by
feed
SUB
;
[
rewrite
in_cons
;
apply
/
orP
;
left

done
].
}
{
destruct
xs
as
[

x
xs
];
first
by
done
.
move
:
(@
in_cat
_
x
ys
)
=>
Lem
.
feed
Lem
;
first
by
apply
SUB
;
rewrite
in_cons
;
apply
/
orP
;
left
.
move
:
Lem
=>
[
ysl
[
ysr
EQ
]];
subst
ys
.
rewrite
!
size_cat
;
simpl
;
rewrite

addnC
add1n
addSn
ltnS

size_cat
.
eapply
IHm
.
...
...
@@ 817,8 +816,7 @@ Section AdditionalLemmas.
by
subst
;
move
:
NIN
=>
/
negP
NIN
;
apply
:
NIN
.
}
{
specialize
(
SUB
a
).
feed
SUB
.
{
by
rewrite
in_cons
;
apply
/
orP
;
right
.
}
feed
SUB
;
first
by
rewrite
in_cons
;
apply
/
orP
;
right
.
clear
IN
;
move
:
SUB
;
rewrite
!
mem_cat
;
move
=>
/
orP
[
IN

/
orP
[
IN

IN
]].

by
apply
/
orP
;
right
.

exfalso
.
...
...
util/step_function.v
View file @
0ac14e20
...
...
@@ 37,47 +37,40 @@ Section StepFunction.
Lemma
exists_intermediate_point
:
exists
x_mid
,
x1
<=
x_mid
<
x2
/\
f
x_mid
=
y
.
Proof
.
unfold
is_step_function
in
*.
rename
H_is_interval
into
INT
,
H_step_function
into
STEP
,
H_between
into
BETWEEN
.
rename
H_is_interval
into
INT
,
H_step_function
into
STEP
,
H_between
into
BETWEEN
.
move
:
x2
INT
BETWEEN
;
clear
x2
.
suff
DELTA
:
forall
delta
,
f
x1
<=
y
<
f
(
x1
+
delta
)
>
exists
x_mid
,
x1
<=
x_mid
<
x1
+
delta
/\
f
x_mid
=
y
.
{
move
=>
x2
LE
/
andP
[
GEy
LTy
].
exists
x_mid
,
x1
<=
x_mid
<
x1
+
delta
/\
f
x_mid
=
y
.
{
move
=>
x2
LE
/
andP
[
GEy
LTy
].
exploit
(
DELTA
(
x2

x1
));
first
by
apply
/
andP
;
split
;
last
by
rewrite
addnBA
//
addKn
.
by
rewrite
addnBA
//
addKn
.
by
rewrite
addnBA
//
addKn
.
}
induction
delta
.
{
rewrite
addn0
;
move
=>
/
andP
[
GE0
LT0
].
by
apply
(
leq_ltn_trans
GE0
)
in
LT0
;
rewrite
ltnn
in
LT0
.
{
rewrite
addn0
;
move
=>
/
andP
[
GE0
LT0
].
by
apply
(
leq_ltn_trans
GE0
)
in
LT0
;
rewrite
ltnn
in
LT0
.
}
{
move
=>
/
andP
[
GT
LT
].
{
move
=>
/
andP
[
GT
LT
].
specialize
(
STEP
(
x1
+
delta
));
rewrite
leq_eqVlt
in
STEP
.
have
LE
:
y
<=
f
(
x1
+
delta
).
{
move
:
STEP
=>
/
orP
[/
eqP
EQ

STEP
];
{
move
:
STEP
=>
/
orP
[/
eqP
EQ

STEP
];
first
by
rewrite
!
addn1
in
EQ
;
rewrite
addnS
EQ
ltnS
in
LT
.
rewrite
[
X
in
_
<
X
]
addn1
ltnS
in
STEP
.
apply
:
(
leq_trans
_
STEP
).
by
rewrite
addn1

addnS
ltnW
.
by
rewrite
addn1

addnS
ltnW
.
}
clear
STEP
LT
.
rewrite
leq_eqVlt
in
LE
.
move
:
LE
=>
/
orP
[/
eqP
EQy

LT
].
{
exists
(
x1
+
delta
);
split
;
last
by
rewrite
EQy
.
by
apply
/
andP
;
split
;
[
by
apply
leq_addr

by
rewrite
addnS
].
{
exists
(
x1
+
delta
);
split
;
last
by
rewrite
EQy
.
by
apply
/
andP
;
split
;
[
by
apply
leq_addr

by
rewrite
addnS
].
}
{
feed
(
IHdelta
);
first
by
apply
/
andP
;
split
.
{
feed
(
IHdelta
);
first
by
apply
/
andP
;
split
.
move
:
IHdelta
=>
[
x_mid
[/
andP
[
GE0
LT0
]
EQ0
]].
exists
x_mid
;
split
;
last
by
done
.
apply
/
andP
;
split
;
first
by
done
.
by
apply
:
(
leq_trans
LT0
);
rewrite
addnS
.
by
apply
:
(
leq_trans
LT0
);
rewrite
addnS
.
}
}
Qed
.
...
...
util/sum.v
View file @
0ac14e20
Require
Import
rt
.
util
.
tactics
rt
.
util
.
notation
rt
.
util
.
sorting
rt
.
util
.
nat
.
From
rt
.
util
Require
Import
tactics
notation
sorting
nat
ssromega
.
From
mathcomp
Require
Import
ssreflect
ssrbool
eqtype
ssrnat
seq
fintype
bigop
path
.
(* Lemmas about sum. *)
...
...
@@ 41,22 +41,18 @@ Section ExtraLemmas.
all
(
fun
x
=>
F
x
==
0
)
r
=
(
\
sum_
(
i
<
r
)
F
i
==
0
).
Proof
.
destruct
(
all
(
fun
x
=>
F
x
==
0
)
r
)
eqn
:
ZERO
.
{
move
:
ZERO
=>
/
allP
ZERO
;
rewrite

leqn0
.

move
:
ZERO
=>
/
allP
ZERO
;
rewrite

leqn0
.
rewrite
big_seq_cond
(
eq_bigr
(
fun
x
=>
0
));
first
by
rewrite
big_const_seq
iter_addn
mul0n
addn0
leqnn
.
intro
i
;
rewrite
andbT
;
intros
IN
.
specialize
(
ZERO
i
);
rewrite
IN
in
ZERO
.
by
move
:
ZERO
=>
/
implyP
ZERO
;
apply
/
eqP
;
apply
ZERO
.
}
{
apply
negbT
in
ZERO
;
rewrite

has_predC
in
ZERO
.

apply
negbT
in
ZERO
;
rewrite

has_predC
in
ZERO
.
move
:
ZERO
=>
/
hasP
ZERO
;
destruct
ZERO
as
[
x
IN
NEQ
];
simpl
in
NEQ
.
rewrite
(
big_rem
x
)
/=;
last
by
done
.
symmetry
;
apply
negbTE
;
rewrite
neq_ltn
;
apply
/
orP
;
right
.
apply
leq_trans
with
(
n
:=
F
x
);
last
by
apply
leq_addr
.
by
rewrite
lt0n
.
}
Qed
.
Lemma
leq_sum1_smaller_range
m
n
(
P
Q
:
pred
nat
)
a
b
:
...
...
@@ 141,7 +137,7 @@ Section ExtraLemmas.
intros
.
rewrite
big_mkcond
[
in
X
in
_
<=
X
]
big_mkcond
//=
leq_sum
//.
intros
i
_.
destruct
P1
eqn
:
P1a
;
destruct
P2
eqn
:
P2a
;
[
by
done


by
done

by
done
].
destruct
P1
eqn
:
P1a
;
destruct
P2
eqn
:
P2a
;
try
done
.
exfalso
.
move
:
P1a
P2a
=>
/
eqP
P1a
/
eqP
P2a
.
rewrite
eqb_id
in
P1a
;
rewrite
eqbF_neg
in
P2a
.
...
...
@@ 209,7 +205,6 @@ Section ExtraLemmas.
\
sum_
(
x
<
xs

P
x
)
F1
x
=
\
sum_
(
x
<
xs

P
x
)
F2
x
>
(
forall
x
,
x
\
in
xs
>
P
x
>
F1
x
=
F2
x
).
Proof
.
clear
.
intros
T
xs
F1
F2
P
H1
H2
x
IN
PX
.
induction
xs
;
first
by
done
.
have
Fact
:
\
sum_
(
j
<
xs

P
j
)
F1
j
<=
\
sum_
(
j
<
xs

P
j
)
F2
j
.
...
...
@@ 223,11 +218,7 @@ Section ExtraLemmas.
by
rewrite
in_cons
;
apply
/
orP
;
right
.
}
rewrite
big_cons
[
RHS
]
big_cons
in
H2
.
have
EqLeq
:
forall
a
b
c
d
,
a
+
b
=
c
+
d
>
a
<=
c
>
b
>=
d
.
{
clear
;
intros
.
rewrite
leqNgt
;
apply
/
negP
;
intros
H1
.
move
:
H
=>
/
eqP
;
rewrite
eqn_leq
;
move
=>
/
andP
[
LE
GE
].
move
:
GE
;
rewrite
leqNgt
;
move
=>
/
negP
GE
;
apply
:
GE
.
by
apply
leq_trans
with
(
a
+
d
);
[
rewrite
ltn_add2l

rewrite
leq_add2r
].
}
{
clear
;
intros
;
ssromega
.
}
move
:
IN
;
rewrite
in_cons
;
move
=>
/
orP
[/
eqP
EQ

IN
].
{
subst
a
.
rewrite
PX
in
H2
.
...
...
Write
Preview
Markdown
is supported
0%
Try again
or
attach a new file
Attach a file
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment