diff --git a/docs/paradoxes.tex b/docs/paradoxes.tex
index 6e005eaccdbe774805f7aa3f35ba57629ba3a15d..4a77596fa9c27ec91e6eba259d2b57538a2c7227 100644
--- a/docs/paradoxes.tex
+++ b/docs/paradoxes.tex
@@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ With this lemma in hand, the proof of \thmref{thm:counterexample-1} is simple.
\label{app:section:invariants-without-a-later}
Now we come to the main paradox: if we remove the $\later$ from \ruleref{inv-open}, the logic becomes inconsistent.
-The theorem is stated as general as possible so taht it also applies to previous, less powerful versions of Iris.
+The theorem is stated as general as possible so that it also applies to previous, less powerful versions of Iris.
\begin{thm}
\label{thm:counterexample-2}