 29 Feb, 2016 4 commits
 28 Feb, 2016 2 commits
 27 Feb, 2016 10 commits


Robbert Krebbers authored

Robbert Krebbers authored

Robbert Krebbers authored

Ralf Jung authored

Ralf Jung authored

Ralf Jung authored

Robbert Krebbers authored

Robbert Krebbers authored

Robbert Krebbers authored
Now we substitute as far into the term as we can. This is to deal with terms that contain Coq variables.

Robbert Krebbers authored

 26 Feb, 2016 17 commits


Robbert Krebbers authored
It is based on type classes and can it be tuned by providing instances, for example, instances can be provided to mark that certain expressions are closed.

Robbert Krebbers authored

Robbert Krebbers authored

Robbert Krebbers authored

Robbert Krebbers authored

Robbert Krebbers authored

Robbert Krebbers authored

Robbert Krebbers authored

Robbert Krebbers authored

Robbert Krebbers authored

Robbert Krebbers authored

Robbert Krebbers authored

Robbert Krebbers authored

Robbert Krebbers authored
It now also contains a nonexpansiveness proof.

Robbert Krebbers authored

Robbert Krebbers authored

Robbert Krebbers authored
I have simplified the following CMRA axioms: cmra_unit_preservingN n x y : x ≼{n} y → unit x ≼{n} unit y; cmra_op_minus n x y : x ≼{n} y → x ⋅ y ⩪ x ≡{n}≡ y; By dropping off the stepindex, so into: cmra_unit_preservingN x y : x ≼ y → unit x ≼ unit y; cmra_op_minus x y : x ≼ y → x ⋅ y ⩪ x ≡ y; The old axioms can be derived.

 25 Feb, 2016 7 commits