 12 Dec, 2016 1 commit


Ralf Jung authored

 09 Dec, 2016 5 commits


Ralf Jung authored

Ralf Jung authored
Really, *all* of our files contain proof rules

Robbert Krebbers authored

Robbert Krebbers authored

Robbert Krebbers authored
The WP construction now takes an invariant on states as a parameter (part of the irisG class) and no longer builds in the authoritative ownership of the entire state. When instantiating WP with a concrete language on can choose its state invariant. For example, for heap_lang we directly use `auth (gmap loc (frac * dec_agree val))`, and avoid the indirection through invariants entirely. As a result, we no longer have to carry `heap_ctx` around.

 03 Nov, 2016 1 commit


Robbert Krebbers authored
The old choice for ★ was a arbitrary: the precedence of the ASCII asterisk * was fixed at a wrong level in Coq, so we had to pick another symbol. The ★ was a random choice from a unicode chart. The new symbol ∗ (as proposed by David Swasey) corresponds better to conventional practise and matches the symbol we use on paper.

 01 Nov, 2016 1 commit


Ralf Jung authored
This should make theme asier to parse, "{{{ v, v; l > v }}}" looks rather funny.

 27 Oct, 2016 1 commit


Ralf Jung authored

 26 Aug, 2016 2 commits


Robbert Krebbers authored

Zhen Zhang authored

 25 Aug, 2016 1 commit


Robbert Krebbers authored
NB: these scopes delimiters were already there before Janno's a0067662.

 09 Aug, 2016 1 commit


Ralf Jung authored

 08 Aug, 2016 1 commit


Robbert Krebbers authored
This makes stuff more uniform and also removes the need for the [inGFs] type class. Instead, there is now a type class [subG Σ1 Σ2] which expresses that a list of functors [Σ1] is contained in [Σ2].

 05 Aug, 2016 4 commits


Robbert Krebbers authored
This better reflects the name of the bind rule. I renamed an internal tactic that was previously called wp_bind into wp_bind_core.

Robbert Krebbers authored

Robbert Krebbers authored
Also make those for introduction and elimination more symmetric: !% pure introduction % pure elimination !# always introduction # always elimination !> later introduction > pat timeless later elimination !==> view shift introduction ==> pat view shift elimination

Robbert Krebbers authored
This commit features:  A simpler model. The recursive domain equation no longer involves a triple containing invariants, physical state and ghost state, but just ghost state. Invariants and physical state are encoded using (higherorder) ghost state.  (Primitive) view shifts are formalized in the logic and all properties about it are proven in the logic instead of the model. Instead, the core logic features only a notion of raw view shifts which internalizing performing frame preserving updates.  A better behaved notion of mask changing view shifts. In particular, we no longer have sideconditions on transitivity of view shifts, and we have a rule for introduction of mask changing view shifts ={E1,E2}=> P with E2 ⊆ E1 which allows to postpone performing a view shift.  The weakest precondition connective is formalized in the logic using Banach's fixpoint. All properties about the connective are proven in the logic instead of directly in the model.  Adequacy is proven in the logic and uses a primitive form of adequacy for uPred that only involves raw views shifts and laters. Some remarks:  I have removed binary view shifts. I did not see a way to describe all rules of the new mask changing view shifts using those.  There is no longer the need for the notion of "frame shifting assertions" and these are thus removed. The rules for Hoare triples are thus also stated in terms of primitive view shifts. TODO:  Maybe rename primitive view shift into something more sensible  Figure out a way to deal with closed proofs (see the commented out stuff in tests/heap_lang and tests/barrier_client).

 20 Jul, 2016 2 commits


Robbert Krebbers authored

Robbert Krebbers authored
In order to improve flexibility, I have reverted the changes in commit 5cabd278 to counter, lock and spawn because an explicit namespace may be in the way of modularity, for example, if the interfaces of these libraries will expose namespaces through view shifts in the future. Exposure of namespaces in the case of par is very unlikely, so to that end, par remains to use an explicit namespace.

 19 Jul, 2016 2 commits


Robbert Krebbers authored

Robbert Krebbers authored

 15 Jul, 2016 1 commit


Robbert Krebbers authored

 13 Jul, 2016 1 commit


Robbert Krebbers authored
The intropattern {H} also meant clear (both in ssreflect, and the logic part of the introduction pattern).

 30 Jun, 2016 1 commit


Robbert Krebbers authored
Concretely, when execution of any of the wp_ tactics does not yield another wp, it will make sure that a view shift is kept. This behavior was already partially there, but now it is hopefully more consistent.

 16 Jun, 2016 1 commit


Robbert Krebbers authored
This introduces n hypotheses and destructs the nth one.

 14 Jun, 2016 1 commit


Robbert Krebbers authored

 01 Jun, 2016 2 commits


Robbert Krebbers authored

Robbert Krebbers authored

 31 May, 2016 1 commit


Robbert Krebbers authored
be the same as
↔ . This is a fairly intrusive change, but at least makes notations more consistent, and often shorter because fewer parentheses are needed. Note that viewshifts already had the same precedence as →.

 24 May, 2016 1 commit


Robbert Krebbers authored
Changes:  We no longer have a different syntax for specializing a term H : P ★ Q whose range P or domain Q is persistent. There is just one syntax, and the system automatically determines whether either P or Q is persistent.  While specializing a term, always modalities are automatically stripped. This gets rid of the specialization pattern !.  Make the syntax of specialization patterns more consistent. The syntax for generating a goal is [goal_spec] where goal_spec is one of the following: H1 .. Hn : generate a goal using hypotheses H1 .. Hn H1 .. Hn : generate a goal using all hypotheses but H1 .. Hn # : generate a goal for the premise in which all hypotheses can be used. This is only allowed when specializing H : P ★ Q where either P or Q is persistent. % : generate a goal for a pure premise.

 10 May, 2016 1 commit


Robbert Krebbers authored
And make constants P for which we do not want of_val P to reduce Opaque.

 06 May, 2016 3 commits


Robbert Krebbers authored

Robbert Krebbers authored

Robbert Krebbers authored

 02 May, 2016 1 commit


Robbert Krebbers authored
iSpecialize and iDestruct. These tactics now all take an iTrm, which is a tuple consisting of a.) a lemma or name of a hypotheses b.) arguments to instantiate c.) a specialization pattern.

 25 Apr, 2016 1 commit


Robbert Krebbers authored

 19 Apr, 2016 2 commits


Robbert Krebbers authored
This gets rid of the (ambiguous) notation %l, because we can declare LitLoc as a coercion. It also shortens the code.

Robbert Krebbers authored

 15 Apr, 2016 1 commit


Ralf Jung authored
