- 01 Mar, 2016 1 commit
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
- 29 Feb, 2016 1 commit
-
-
Ralf Jung authored
-
- 26 Feb, 2016 4 commits
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
It now also contains a non-expansiveness proof.
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
I have simplified the following CMRA axioms: cmra_unit_preservingN n x y : x ≼{n} y → unit x ≼{n} unit y; cmra_op_minus n x y : x ≼{n} y → x ⋅ y ⩪ x ≡{n}≡ y; By dropping off the step-index, so into: cmra_unit_preservingN x y : x ≼ y → unit x ≼ unit y; cmra_op_minus x y : x ≼ y → x ⋅ y ⩪ x ≡ y; The old axioms can be derived.
-
- 24 Feb, 2016 3 commits
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
This way it behaves better for discrete CMRAs.
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
- 20 Feb, 2016 1 commit
-
-
Ralf Jung authored
-
- 19 Feb, 2016 2 commits
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
This fix removes superflous white space in pretty printing. For example ✓{S n} x was pretty printed incorrectly as ✓{(S n)} x.
-
- 18 Feb, 2016 1 commit
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
- 17 Feb, 2016 1 commit
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
- 15 Feb, 2016 1 commit
-
-
Ralf Jung authored
-
- 13 Feb, 2016 5 commits
-
-
Ralf Jung authored
-
Ralf Jung authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
Also, make our redefinition of done more robust under different orders of Importing modules.
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
Since Coq 8.4 did not backtrack on eauto premises, we used to ensure that hints like Hint Extern 0 (?x ≡{_}≡ ?y) => reflexivity. were not used for goals involving evars by writing ?x ≡{_}≡ ?y instead of _ ≡{_}≡ _. This seems to be a legacy issue that no longer applies to Coq 8.5, so I have removed these restrictions making these hints thus more powerful.
-
Ralf Jung authored
-
- 11 Feb, 2016 7 commits
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
Also do some minor clean up.
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Ralf Jung authored
-
Ralf Jung authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
Instead, I separate it into a total function and a predicate describe whether the action is allowed or not. This has some advantages: * It is much easier to deal with total functions and predicates in Coq than with functions into option. * Already existing functions do not need to be wrapped. Instead, when using a local update you end up with a sensible side condition as a Coq Prop. * The definition of local updates (and all CMRA instances) no longer depend on option.
-
- 10 Feb, 2016 4 commits
-
-
Ralf Jung authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
This way we avoid many one-off indexes and no longer need special cases for index 0 in many definitions. For example, the definition of the distance relation on option and excl has become much easier. Also, uPreds no longer need to hold at index 0. In order to make this change possible, we had to change the notions of "contractive functions" and "chains" slightly. Thanks to Aleš Bizjak and Amin Timany for suggesting this change and to help with the proofs.
-
Ralf Jung authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
- 09 Feb, 2016 1 commit
-
-
Ralf Jung authored
-
- 08 Feb, 2016 4 commits
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Ralf Jung authored
-
Ralf Jung authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
- 04 Feb, 2016 4 commits
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
* Insert and singleton operation. * Identity element. * Non-expansiveness and properness of insert and singleton. * Frame preserving updates. * Functoriality.
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-