Commit e5bb24e7 authored by Jacques-Henri Jourdan's avatar Jacques-Henri Jourdan

Typos.

parent 0495154c
...@@ -18,16 +18,17 @@ Record uPred (M : ucmraT) : Type := IProp { ...@@ -18,16 +18,17 @@ Record uPred (M : ucmraT) : Type := IProp {
otherwise this condition is no longer limit preserving, and uPred otherwise this condition is no longer limit preserving, and uPred
does no longer form a COFE (i.e., [uPred_compl] breaks). This is does no longer form a COFE (i.e., [uPred_compl] breaks). This is
because the distance and equivalence on this cofe ignores the because the distance and equivalence on this cofe ignores the
truth valid on invalid elements. This, in turns, is required by truth value on invalid elements. This, in turn, is required by
the fact that entailment has to ignore invalid elements, which is the fact that entailment has to ignore invalid elements, which is
itself essential for proving [ownM_valid]. itself essential for proving [ownM_valid].
We could, actually, make the following condition true even for We could, actually, remove this restriction and make this
invalid elements: we have proved that uPred is isomorphic to a condition apply even to invalid elements: we have proved that
sub-COFE of the COFE of predicates that are monotonous both with uPred is isomorphic to a sub-COFE of the COFE of predicates that
respect to the step index and with respect to x. However, that are monotonous both with respect to the step index and with
would essentially require changing (by making more complicated) respect to x. However, that would essentially require changing
the model of many connectives of the logic, which we don't want. *) (by making it more complicated) the model of many connectives of
the logic, which we don't want. *)
uPred_closed n1 n2 x : uPred_holds n1 x n2 n1 {n2} x uPred_holds n2 x uPred_closed n1 n2 x : uPred_holds n1 x n2 n1 {n2} x uPred_holds n2 x
}. }.
Arguments uPred_holds {_} _ _ _ : simpl never. Arguments uPred_holds {_} _ _ _ : simpl never.
......
Markdown is supported
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment