Skip to content
GitLab
Menu
Projects
Groups
Snippets
/
Help
Help
Support
Community forum
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Submit feedback
Contribute to GitLab
Sign in / Register
Toggle navigation
Menu
Open sidebar
Rodolphe Lepigre
Iris
Commits
dd01b3af
Commit
dd01b3af
authored
Mar 11, 2016
by
Ralf Jung
Browse files
add some TODO so some stuff does not get forgotten
parent
3f715e68
Changes
2
Show whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
algebra/dra.v
View file @
dd01b3af
...
@@ -127,6 +127,7 @@ Lemma to_validity_op (x y : A) :
...
@@ -127,6 +127,7 @@ Lemma to_validity_op (x y : A) :
to_validity
(
x
⋅
y
)
≡
to_validity
x
⋅
to_validity
y
.
to_validity
(
x
⋅
y
)
≡
to_validity
x
⋅
to_validity
y
.
Proof
.
split
;
naive_solver
auto
using
dra_op_valid
.
Qed
.
Proof
.
split
;
naive_solver
auto
using
dra_op_valid
.
Qed
.
(* TODO: This has to be proven again. *)
(*
(*
Lemma to_validity_included x y:
Lemma to_validity_included x y:
(✓ y ∧ to_validity x ≼ to_validity y)%C ↔ (✓ x ∧ x ≼ y).
(✓ y ∧ to_validity x ≼ to_validity y)%C ↔ (✓ x ∧ x ≼ y).
...
...
algebra/sts.v
View file @
dd01b3af
...
@@ -385,6 +385,7 @@ Qed.
...
@@ -385,6 +385,7 @@ Qed.
(* This is surprisingly different from to_validity_included. I am not sure
(* This is surprisingly different from to_validity_included. I am not sure
whether this is because to_validity_included is non-canonical, or this
whether this is because to_validity_included is non-canonical, or this
one here is non-canonical - but I suspect both. *)
one here is non-canonical - but I suspect both. *)
(* TODO: These have to be proven again. *)
(*
(*
Lemma sts_frag_included S1 S2 T1 T2 :
Lemma sts_frag_included S1 S2 T1 T2 :
closed S2 T2 → S2 ≢ ∅ →
closed S2 T2 → S2 ≢ ∅ →
...
...
Write
Preview
Supports
Markdown
0%
Try again
or
attach a new file
.
Attach a file
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment