Skip to content
GitLab
Projects
Groups
Snippets
Help
Loading...
Help
What's new
10
Help
Support
Community forum
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Submit feedback
Contribute to GitLab
Sign in / Register
Toggle navigation
Open sidebar
Rodolphe Lepigre
Iris
Commits
a0b4ccc2
Commit
a0b4ccc2
authored
Aug 30, 2019
by
Dan Frumin
Browse files
Options
Browse Files
Download
Email Patches
Plain Diff
fix typo
parent
eaeb5851
Changes
1
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
1 changed file
with
1 addition
and
1 deletion
+1
-1
docs/paradoxes.tex
docs/paradoxes.tex
+1
-1
No files found.
docs/paradoxes.tex
View file @
a0b4ccc2
...
...
@@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ With this lemma in hand, the proof of \thmref{thm:counterexample-1} is simple.
\label
{
app:section:invariants-without-a-later
}
Now we come to the main paradox: if we remove the
$
\later
$
from
\ruleref
{
inv-open
}
, the logic becomes inconsistent.
The theorem is stated as general as possible so t
a
ht it also applies to previous, less powerful versions of Iris.
The theorem is stated as general as possible so th
a
t it also applies to previous, less powerful versions of Iris.
\begin{thm}
\label
{
thm:counterexample-2
}
...
...
Write
Preview
Markdown
is supported
0%
Try again
or
attach a new file
.
Attach a file
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment