From 345e24d780870e9801bf78d0a2d403530481b02c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ralf Jung Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2019 13:51:04 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] fix typo in -d> docs --- theories/algebra/ofe.v | 18 +++++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/theories/algebra/ofe.v b/theories/algebra/ofe.v index ffaa9239..1f53c8d7 100644 --- a/theories/algebra/ofe.v +++ b/theories/algebra/ofe.v @@ -1105,11 +1105,19 @@ Proof. Qed. (** Dependently-typed functions over a discrete domain *) -(** We make [discrete_fun] a definition so that we can register it as a -canonical structure. Note that non-dependent functions over a discrete domain, -[discrete_fun (λ _, A) B] (or [A -d> B] following the notation we introduce -below) are isomorphic to [leibnizO A -n> B]. In other words, since the domain -is discrete, we get non-expansiveness for free. *) +(** This separate notion is useful whenever we need dependent functions, and +whenever we want to avoid the hassle of the bundled non-expansive function type. + +Note that non-dependent functions over a discrete domain, [A -d> B] (following +the notation we introduce below) are non-expansive if they are +[Proper ((≡) ==> (≡))]. In other words, since the domain is discrete, +non-expansiveness and respecting [(≡)] are the same. If the domain is moreover +Leibniz ([LeibnizEquiv A]), we get both for free. + +We make [discrete_fun] a definition so that we can register it as a canonical +structure. We do not bundle the [Proper] proof to keep [discrete_fun] easier to +use. It turns out all the desired OFE and functorial properties do not rely on +this [Proper] instance. *) Definition discrete_fun {A} (B : A → ofeT) := ∀ x : A, B x. Section discrete_fun. -- GitLab