Skip to content
GitLab
Menu
Projects
Groups
Snippets
Loading...
Help
Help
Support
Community forum
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Submit feedback
Contribute to GitLab
Sign in / Register
Toggle navigation
Menu
Open sidebar
Rodolphe Lepigre
Iris
Commits
345e24d7
Commit
345e24d7
authored
Aug 12, 2019
by
Ralf Jung
Committed by
Robbert Krebbers
Aug 12, 2019
Browse files
fix typo in -d> docs
parent
74858b88
Changes
1
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
1 changed file
with
13 additions
and
5 deletions
+13
-5
theories/algebra/ofe.v
theories/algebra/ofe.v
+13
-5
No files found.
theories/algebra/ofe.v
View file @
345e24d7
...
...
@@ -1105,11 +1105,19 @@ Proof.
Qed
.
(** Dependently-typed functions over a discrete domain *)
(** We make [discrete_fun] a definition so that we can register it as a
canonical structure. Note that non-dependent functions over a discrete domain,
[discrete_fun (λ _, A) B] (or [A -d> B] following the notation we introduce
below) are isomorphic to [leibnizO A -n> B]. In other words, since the domain
is discrete, we get non-expansiveness for free. *)
(** This separate notion is useful whenever we need dependent functions, and
whenever we want to avoid the hassle of the bundled non-expansive function type.
Note that non-dependent functions over a discrete domain, [A -d> B] (following
the notation we introduce below) are non-expansive if they are
[Proper ((≡) ==> (≡))]. In other words, since the domain is discrete,
non-expansiveness and respecting [(≡)] are the same. If the domain is moreover
Leibniz ([LeibnizEquiv A]), we get both for free.
We make [discrete_fun] a definition so that we can register it as a canonical
structure. We do not bundle the [Proper] proof to keep [discrete_fun] easier to
use. It turns out all the desired OFE and functorial properties do not rely on
this [Proper] instance. *)
Definition
discrete_fun
{
A
}
(
B
:
A
→
ofeT
)
:
=
∀
x
:
A
,
B
x
.
Section
discrete_fun
.
...
...
Write
Preview
Markdown
is supported
0%
Try again
or
attach a new file
.
Attach a file
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment