list.v 153 KB
Newer Older
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
1 2 3 4
(* Copyright (c) 2012-2015, Robbert Krebbers. *)
(* This file is distributed under the terms of the BSD license. *)
(** This file collects general purpose definitions and theorems on lists that
are not in the Coq standard library. *)
5
From Coq Require Export Permutation.
6
From prelude Require Export numbers base option.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36

Arguments length {_} _.
Arguments cons {_} _ _.
Arguments app {_} _ _.
Arguments Permutation {_} _ _.
Arguments Forall_cons {_} _ _ _ _ _.

Notation tail := tl.
Notation take := firstn.
Notation drop := skipn.

Arguments take {_} !_ !_ /.
Arguments drop {_} !_ !_ /.

Notation "(::)" := cons (only parsing) : C_scope.
Notation "( x ::)" := (cons x) (only parsing) : C_scope.
Notation "(:: l )" := (λ x, cons x l) (only parsing) : C_scope.
Notation "(++)" := app (only parsing) : C_scope.
Notation "( l ++)" := (app l) (only parsing) : C_scope.
Notation "(++ k )" := (λ l, app l k) (only parsing) : C_scope.

Infix "≡ₚ" := Permutation (at level 70, no associativity) : C_scope.
Notation "(≡ₚ)" := Permutation (only parsing) : C_scope.
Notation "( x ≡ₚ)" := (Permutation x) (only parsing) : C_scope.
Notation "(≡ₚ x )" := (λ y, y ≡ₚ x) (only parsing) : C_scope.
Notation "(≢ₚ)" := (λ x y, ¬x ≡ₚ y) (only parsing) : C_scope.
Notation "x ≢ₚ y":= (¬x ≡ₚ y) (at level 70, no associativity) : C_scope.
Notation "( x ≢ₚ)" := (λ y, x ≢ₚ y) (only parsing) : C_scope.
Notation "(≢ₚ x )" := (λ y, y ≢ₚ x) (only parsing) : C_scope.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
37 38 39
Instance maybe_cons {A} : Maybe2 (@cons A) := λ l,
  match l with x :: l => Some (x,l) | _ => None end.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
40
(** * Definitions *)
41 42 43 44 45 46
(** Setoid equality lifted to lists *)
Inductive list_equiv `{Equiv A} : Equiv (list A) :=
  | nil_equiv : [] ≡ []
  | cons_equiv x y l k : x ≡ y → l ≡ k → x :: l ≡ y :: k.
Existing Instance list_equiv.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222
(** The operation [l !! i] gives the [i]th element of the list [l], or [None]
in case [i] is out of bounds. *)
Instance list_lookup {A} : Lookup nat A (list A) :=
  fix go i l {struct l} : option A := let _ : Lookup _ _ _ := @go in
  match l with
  | [] => None | x :: l => match i with 0 => Some x | S i => l !! i end
  end.

(** The operation [alter f i l] applies the function [f] to the [i]th element
of [l]. In case [i] is out of bounds, the list is returned unchanged. *)
Instance list_alter {A} : Alter nat A (list A) := λ f,
  fix go i l {struct l} :=
  match l with
  | [] => []
  | x :: l => match i with 0 => f x :: l | S i => x :: go i l end
  end.

(** The operation [<[i:=x]> l] overwrites the element at position [i] with the
value [x]. In case [i] is out of bounds, the list is returned unchanged. *)
Instance list_insert {A} : Insert nat A (list A) :=
  fix go i y l {struct l} := let _ : Insert _ _ _ := @go in
  match l with
  | [] => []
  | x :: l => match i with 0 => y :: l | S i => x :: <[i:=y]>l end
  end.
Fixpoint list_inserts {A} (i : nat) (k l : list A) : list A :=
  match k with
  | [] => l
  | y :: k => <[i:=y]>(list_inserts (S i) k l)
  end.

(** The operation [delete i l] removes the [i]th element of [l] and moves
all consecutive elements one position ahead. In case [i] is out of bounds,
the list is returned unchanged. *)
Instance list_delete {A} : Delete nat (list A) :=
  fix go (i : nat) (l : list A) {struct l} : list A :=
  match l with
  | [] => []
  | x :: l => match i with 0 => l | S i => x :: @delete _ _ go i l end
  end.

(** The function [option_list o] converts an element [Some x] into the
singleton list [[x]], and [None] into the empty list [[]]. *)
Definition option_list {A} : option A → list A := option_rect _ (λ x, [x]) [].
Definition list_singleton {A} (l : list A) : option A :=
  match l with [x] => Some x | _ => None end.

(** The function [filter P l] returns the list of elements of [l] that
satisfies [P]. The order remains unchanged. *)
Instance list_filter {A} : Filter A (list A) :=
  fix go P _ l := let _ : Filter _ _ := @go in
  match l with
  | [] => []
  | x :: l => if decide (P x) then x :: filter P l else filter P l
  end.

(** The function [list_find P l] returns the first index [i] whose element
satisfies the predicate [P]. *)
Definition list_find {A} P `{∀ x, Decision (P x)} : list A → option (nat * A) :=
  fix go l :=
  match l with
  | [] => None
  | x :: l => if decide (P x) then Some (0,x) else prod_map S id <$> go l
  end.

(** The function [replicate n x] generates a list with length [n] of elements
with value [x]. *)
Fixpoint replicate {A} (n : nat) (x : A) : list A :=
  match n with 0 => [] | S n => x :: replicate n x end.

(** The function [reverse l] returns the elements of [l] in reverse order. *)
Definition reverse {A} (l : list A) : list A := rev_append l [].

(** The function [last l] returns the last element of the list [l], or [None]
if the list [l] is empty. *)
Fixpoint last {A} (l : list A) : option A :=
  match l with [] => None | [x] => Some x | _ :: l => last l end.

(** The function [resize n y l] takes the first [n] elements of [l] in case
[length l ≤ n], and otherwise appends elements with value [x] to [l] to obtain
a list of length [n]. *)
Fixpoint resize {A} (n : nat) (y : A) (l : list A) : list A :=
  match l with
  | [] => replicate n y
  | x :: l => match n with 0 => [] | S n => x :: resize n y l end
  end.
Arguments resize {_} !_ _ !_.

(** The function [reshape k l] transforms [l] into a list of lists whose sizes
are specified by [k]. In case [l] is too short, the resulting list will be
padded with empty lists. In case [l] is too long, it will be truncated. *)
Fixpoint reshape {A} (szs : list nat) (l : list A) : list (list A) :=
  match szs with
  | [] => [] | sz :: szs => take sz l :: reshape szs (drop sz l)
  end.

Definition sublist_lookup {A} (i n : nat) (l : list A) : option (list A) :=
  guard (i + n ≤ length l); Some (take n (drop i l)).
Definition sublist_alter {A} (f : list A → list A)
    (i n : nat) (l : list A) : list A :=
  take i l ++ f (take n (drop i l)) ++ drop (i + n) l.

(** Functions to fold over a list. We redefine [foldl] with the arguments in
the same order as in Haskell. *)
Notation foldr := fold_right.
Definition foldl {A B} (f : A → B → A) : A → list B → A :=
  fix go a l := match l with [] => a | x :: l => go (f a x) l end.

(** The monadic operations. *)
Instance list_ret: MRet list := λ A x, x :: @nil A.
Instance list_fmap : FMap list := λ A B f,
  fix go (l : list A) := match l with [] => [] | x :: l => f x :: go l end.
Instance list_omap : OMap list := λ A B f,
  fix go (l : list A) :=
  match l with
  | [] => []
  | x :: l => match f x with Some y => y :: go l | None => go l end
  end.
Instance list_bind : MBind list := λ A B f,
  fix go (l : list A) := match l with [] => [] | x :: l => f x ++ go l end.
Instance list_join: MJoin list :=
  fix go A (ls : list (list A)) : list A :=
  match ls with [] => [] | l :: ls => l ++ @mjoin _ go _ ls end.
Definition mapM `{MBind M, MRet M} {A B} (f : A → M B) : list A → M (list B) :=
  fix go l :=
  match l with [] => mret [] | x :: l => y ← f x; k ← go l; mret (y :: k) end.

(** We define stronger variants of map and fold that allow the mapped
function to use the index of the elements. *)
Definition imap_go {A B} (f : nat → A → B) : nat → list A → list B :=
  fix go (n : nat) (l : list A) :=
  match l with [] => [] | x :: l => f n x :: go (S n) l end.
Definition imap {A B} (f : nat → A → B) : list A → list B := imap_go f 0.
Definition zipped_map {A B} (f : list A → list A → A → B) :
  list A → list A → list B := fix go l k :=
  match k with [] => [] | x :: k => f l k x :: go (x :: l) k end.

Definition imap2_go {A B C} (f : nat → A → B → C) :
    nat → list A → list B → list C:=
  fix go (n : nat) (l : list A) (k : list B) :=
  match l, k with
  | [], _ |_, [] => [] | x :: l, y :: k => f n x y :: go (S n) l k
  end.
Definition imap2 {A B C} (f : nat → A → B → C) :
  list A → list B → list C := imap2_go f 0.

Inductive zipped_Forall {A} (P : list A → list A → A → Prop) :
    list A → list A → Prop :=
  | zipped_Forall_nil l : zipped_Forall P l []
  | zipped_Forall_cons l k x :
     P l k x → zipped_Forall P (x :: l) k → zipped_Forall P l (x :: k).
Arguments zipped_Forall_nil {_ _} _.
Arguments zipped_Forall_cons {_ _} _ _ _ _ _.

(** The function [mask f βs l] applies the function [f] to elements in [l] at
positions that are [true] in [βs]. *)
Fixpoint mask {A} (f : A → A) (βs : list bool) (l : list A) : list A :=
  match βs, l with
  | β :: βs, x :: l => (if β then f x else x) :: mask f βs l
  | _, _ => l
  end.

(** The function [permutations l] yields all permutations of [l]. *)
Fixpoint interleave {A} (x : A) (l : list A) : list (list A) :=
  match l with
  | [] => [[x]]| y :: l => (x :: y :: l) :: ((y ::) <$> interleave x l)
  end.
Fixpoint permutations {A} (l : list A) : list (list A) :=
  match l with [] => [[]] | x :: l => permutations l ≫= interleave x end.

(** The predicate [suffix_of] holds if the first list is a suffix of the second.
The predicate [prefix_of] holds if the first list is a prefix of the second. *)
Definition suffix_of {A} : relation (list A) := λ l1 l2, ∃ k, l2 = k ++ l1.
Definition prefix_of {A} : relation (list A) := λ l1 l2, ∃ k, l2 = l1 ++ k.
Infix "`suffix_of`" := suffix_of (at level 70) : C_scope.
Infix "`prefix_of`" := prefix_of (at level 70) : C_scope.
223 224
Hint Extern 0 (_ `prefix_of` _) => reflexivity.
Hint Extern 0 (_ `suffix_of` _) => reflexivity.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251

Section prefix_suffix_ops.
  Context `{∀ x y : A, Decision (x = y)}.
  Definition max_prefix_of : list A → list A → list A * list A * list A :=
    fix go l1 l2 :=
    match l1, l2 with
    | [], l2 => ([], l2, [])
    | l1, [] => (l1, [], [])
    | x1 :: l1, x2 :: l2 =>
      if decide_rel (=) x1 x2
      then prod_map id (x1 ::) (go l1 l2) else (x1 :: l1, x2 :: l2, [])
    end.
  Definition max_suffix_of (l1 l2 : list A) : list A * list A * list A :=
    match max_prefix_of (reverse l1) (reverse l2) with
    | (k1, k2, k3) => (reverse k1, reverse k2, reverse k3)
    end.
  Definition strip_prefix (l1 l2 : list A) := (max_prefix_of l1 l2).1.2.
  Definition strip_suffix (l1 l2 : list A) := (max_suffix_of l1 l2).1.2.
End prefix_suffix_ops.

(** A list [l1] is a sublist of [l2] if [l2] is obtained by removing elements
from [l1] without changing the order. *)
Inductive sublist {A} : relation (list A) :=
  | sublist_nil : sublist [] []
  | sublist_skip x l1 l2 : sublist l1 l2 → sublist (x :: l1) (x :: l2)
  | sublist_cons x l1 l2 : sublist l1 l2 → sublist l1 (x :: l2).
Infix "`sublist`" := sublist (at level 70) : C_scope.
252
Hint Extern 0 (_ `sublist` _) => reflexivity.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262

(** A list [l2] contains a list [l1] if [l2] is obtained by removing elements
from [l1] while possiblity changing the order. *)
Inductive contains {A} : relation (list A) :=
  | contains_nil : contains [] []
  | contains_skip x l1 l2 : contains l1 l2 → contains (x :: l1) (x :: l2)
  | contains_swap x y l : contains (y :: x :: l) (x :: y :: l)
  | contains_cons x l1 l2 : contains l1 l2 → contains l1 (x :: l2)
  | contains_trans l1 l2 l3 : contains l1 l2 → contains l2 l3 → contains l1 l3.
Infix "`contains`" := contains (at level 70) : C_scope.
263
Hint Extern 0 (_ `contains` _) => reflexivity.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284

Section contains_dec_help.
  Context {A} {dec : ∀ x y : A, Decision (x = y)}.
  Fixpoint list_remove (x : A) (l : list A) : option (list A) :=
    match l with
    | [] => None
    | y :: l => if decide (x = y) then Some l else (y ::) <$> list_remove x l
    end.
  Fixpoint list_remove_list (k : list A) (l : list A) : option (list A) :=
    match k with
    | [] => Some l | x :: k => list_remove x l ≫= list_remove_list k
    end.
End contains_dec_help.

Inductive Forall3 {A B C} (P : A → B → C → Prop) :
     list A → list B → list C → Prop :=
  | Forall3_nil : Forall3 P [] [] []
  | Forall3_cons x y z l k k' :
     P x y z → Forall3 P l k k' → Forall3 P (x :: l) (y :: k) (z :: k').

(** Set operations on lists *)
285 286 287
Definition included {A} (l1 l2 : list A) := ∀ x, x ∈ l1 → x ∈ l2.
Infix "`included`" := included (at level 70) : C_scope.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330
Section list_set.
  Context {A} {dec : ∀ x y : A, Decision (x = y)}.
  Global Instance elem_of_list_dec {dec : ∀ x y : A, Decision (x = y)}
    (x : A) : ∀ l, Decision (x ∈ l).
  Proof.
   refine (
    fix go l :=
    match l return Decision (x ∈ l) with
    | [] => right _
    | y :: l => cast_if_or (decide (x = y)) (go l)
    end); clear go dec; subst; try (by constructor); abstract by inversion 1.
  Defined.
  Fixpoint remove_dups (l : list A) : list A :=
    match l with
    | [] => []
    | x :: l =>
      if decide_rel (∈) x l then remove_dups l else x :: remove_dups l
    end.
  Fixpoint list_difference (l k : list A) : list A :=
    match l with
    | [] => []
    | x :: l =>
      if decide_rel (∈) x k
      then list_difference l k else x :: list_difference l k
    end.
  Definition list_union (l k : list A) : list A := list_difference l k ++ k.
  Fixpoint list_intersection (l k : list A) : list A :=
    match l with
    | [] => []
    | x :: l =>
      if decide_rel (∈) x k
      then x :: list_intersection l k else list_intersection l k
    end.
  Definition list_intersection_with (f : A → A → option A) :
    list A → list A → list A := fix go l k :=
    match l with
    | [] => []
    | x :: l => foldr (λ y,
        match f x y with None => id | Some z => (z ::) end) (go l k) k
    end.
End list_set.

(** * Basic tactics on lists *)
331
(** The tactic [discriminate_list] discharges a goal if it contains
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
332 333
a list equality involving [(::)] and [(++)] of two lists that have a different
length as one of its hypotheses. *)
334
Tactic Notation "discriminate_list" hyp(H) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
335 336
  apply (f_equal length) in H;
  repeat (csimpl in H || rewrite app_length in H); exfalso; lia.
337 338
Tactic Notation "discriminate_list" :=
  match goal with H : @eq (list _) _ _ |- _ => discriminate_list H end.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
339

340
(** The tactic [simplify_list_eq] simplifies hypotheses involving
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
341 342
equalities on lists using injectivity of [(::)] and [(++)]. Also, it simplifies
lookups in singleton lists. *)
343
Lemma app_inj_1 {A} (l1 k1 l2 k2 : list A) :
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
344 345
  length l1 = length k1 → l1 ++ l2 = k1 ++ k2 → l1 = k1 ∧ l2 = k2.
Proof. revert k1. induction l1; intros [|??]; naive_solver. Qed.
346
Lemma app_inj_2 {A} (l1 k1 l2 k2 : list A) :
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
347 348
  length l2 = length k2 → l1 ++ l2 = k1 ++ k2 → l1 = k1 ∧ l2 = k2.
Proof.
349
  intros ? Hl. apply app_inj_1; auto.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
350 351
  apply (f_equal length) in Hl. rewrite !app_length in Hl. lia.
Qed.
352
Ltac simplify_list_eq :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
353
  repeat match goal with
354
  | _ => progress simplify_eq/=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
355 356
  | H : _ ++ _ = _ ++ _ |- _ => first
    [ apply app_inv_head in H | apply app_inv_tail in H
357 358
    | apply app_inj_1 in H; [destruct H|done]
    | apply app_inj_2 in H; [destruct H|done] ]
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368
  | H : [?x] !! ?i = Some ?y |- _ =>
    destruct i; [change (Some x = Some y) in H | discriminate]
  end.

(** * General theorems *)
Section general_properties.
Context {A : Type}.
Implicit Types x y z : A.
Implicit Types l k : list A.

369 370 371 372 373
Section setoid.
  Context `{Equiv A} `{!Equivalence ((≡) : relation A)}.
  Global Instance map_equivalence : Equivalence ((≡) : relation (list A)).
  Proof.
    split.
374 375 376
    - intros l; induction l; constructor; auto.
    - induction 1; constructor; auto.
    - intros l1 l2 l3 Hl; revert l3.
377
      induction Hl; inversion_clear 1; constructor; try etrans; eauto.
378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386
  Qed.
  Global Instance cons_proper : Proper ((≡) ==> (≡) ==> (≡)) (@cons A).
  Proof. by constructor. Qed.
  Global Instance app_proper : Proper ((≡) ==> (≡) ==> (≡)) (@app A).
  Proof.
    induction 1 as [|x y l k ?? IH]; intros ?? Htl; simpl; auto.
    by apply cons_equiv, IH.
  Qed.
  Global Instance list_leibniz `{!LeibnizEquiv A} : LeibnizEquiv (list A).
387
  Proof. induction 1; f_equal; fold_leibniz; auto. Qed.
388 389
End setoid.

390
Global Instance: Inj2 (=) (=) (=) (@cons A).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
391
Proof. by injection 1. Qed.
392
Global Instance: ∀ k, Inj (=) (=) (k ++).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
393
Proof. intros ???. apply app_inv_head. Qed.
394
Global Instance: ∀ k, Inj (=) (=) (++ k).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
395
Proof. intros ???. apply app_inv_tail. Qed.
396
Global Instance: Assoc (=) (@app A).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412
Proof. intros ???. apply app_assoc. Qed.
Global Instance: LeftId (=) [] (@app A).
Proof. done. Qed.
Global Instance: RightId (=) [] (@app A).
Proof. intro. apply app_nil_r. Qed.

Lemma app_nil l1 l2 : l1 ++ l2 = [] ↔ l1 = [] ∧ l2 = [].
Proof. split. apply app_eq_nil. by intros [-> ->]. Qed.
Lemma app_singleton l1 l2 x :
  l1 ++ l2 = [x] ↔ l1 = [] ∧ l2 = [x] ∨ l1 = [x] ∧ l2 = [].
Proof. split. apply app_eq_unit. by intros [[-> ->]|[-> ->]]. Qed.
Lemma cons_middle x l1 l2 : l1 ++ x :: l2 = l1 ++ [x] ++ l2.
Proof. done. Qed.
Lemma list_eq l1 l2 : (∀ i, l1 !! i = l2 !! i) → l1 = l2.
Proof.
  revert l2. induction l1; intros [|??] H.
413 414 415 416
  - done.
  - discriminate (H 0).
  - discriminate (H 0).
  - f_equal; [by injection (H 0)|]. apply (IHl1 _ $ λ i, H (S i)).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437
Qed.
Global Instance list_eq_dec {dec : ∀ x y, Decision (x = y)} : ∀ l k,
  Decision (l = k) := list_eq_dec dec.
Global Instance list_eq_nil_dec l : Decision (l = []).
Proof. by refine match l with [] => left _ | _ => right _ end. Defined.
Lemma list_singleton_reflect l :
  option_reflect (λ x, l = [x]) (length l ≠ 1) (list_singleton l).
Proof. by destruct l as [|? []]; constructor. Defined.

Definition nil_length : length (@nil A) = 0 := eq_refl.
Definition cons_length x l : length (x :: l) = S (length l) := eq_refl.
Lemma nil_or_length_pos l : l = [] ∨ length l ≠ 0.
Proof. destruct l; simpl; auto with lia. Qed.
Lemma nil_length_inv l : length l = 0 → l = [].
Proof. by destruct l. Qed.
Lemma lookup_nil i : @nil A !! i = None.
Proof. by destruct i. Qed.
Lemma lookup_tail l i : tail l !! i = l !! S i.
Proof. by destruct l. Qed.
Lemma lookup_lt_Some l i x : l !! i = Some x → i < length l.
Proof.
438
  revert i. induction l; intros [|?] ?; simplify_eq/=; auto with arith.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
439 440 441 442 443
Qed.
Lemma lookup_lt_is_Some_1 l i : is_Some (l !! i) → i < length l.
Proof. intros [??]; eauto using lookup_lt_Some. Qed.
Lemma lookup_lt_is_Some_2 l i : i < length l → is_Some (l !! i).
Proof.
444
  revert i. induction l; intros [|?] ?; simplify_eq/=; eauto with lia.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458
Qed.
Lemma lookup_lt_is_Some l i : is_Some (l !! i) ↔ i < length l.
Proof. split; auto using lookup_lt_is_Some_1, lookup_lt_is_Some_2. Qed.
Lemma lookup_ge_None l i : l !! i = None ↔ length l ≤ i.
Proof. rewrite eq_None_not_Some, lookup_lt_is_Some. lia. Qed.
Lemma lookup_ge_None_1 l i : l !! i = None → length l ≤ i.
Proof. by rewrite lookup_ge_None. Qed.
Lemma lookup_ge_None_2 l i : length l ≤ i → l !! i = None.
Proof. by rewrite lookup_ge_None. Qed.
Lemma list_eq_same_length l1 l2 n :
  length l2 = n → length l1 = n →
  (∀ i x y, i < n → l1 !! i = Some x → l2 !! i = Some y → x = y) → l1 = l2.
Proof.
  intros <- Hlen Hl; apply list_eq; intros i. destruct (l2 !! i) as [x|] eqn:Hx.
459
  - destruct (lookup_lt_is_Some_2 l1 i) as [y Hy].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
460 461
    { rewrite Hlen; eauto using lookup_lt_Some. }
    rewrite Hy; f_equal; apply (Hl i); eauto using lookup_lt_Some.
462
  - by rewrite lookup_ge_None, Hlen, <-lookup_ge_None.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475
Qed.
Lemma lookup_app_l l1 l2 i : i < length l1 → (l1 ++ l2) !! i = l1 !! i.
Proof. revert i. induction l1; intros [|?]; simpl; auto with lia. Qed.
Lemma lookup_app_l_Some l1 l2 i x : l1 !! i = Some x → (l1 ++ l2) !! i = Some x.
Proof. intros. rewrite lookup_app_l; eauto using lookup_lt_Some. Qed.
Lemma lookup_app_r l1 l2 i :
  length l1 ≤ i → (l1 ++ l2) !! i = l2 !! (i - length l1).
Proof. revert i. induction l1; intros [|?]; simpl; auto with lia. Qed.
Lemma lookup_app_Some l1 l2 i x :
  (l1 ++ l2) !! i = Some x ↔
    l1 !! i = Some x ∨ length l1 ≤ i ∧ l2 !! (i - length l1) = Some x.
Proof.
  split.
476
  - revert i. induction l1 as [|y l1 IH]; intros [|i] ?;
477
      simplify_eq/=; auto with lia.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
478
    destruct (IH i) as [?|[??]]; auto with lia.
479
  - intros [?|[??]]; auto using lookup_app_l_Some. by rewrite lookup_app_r.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
480 481 482 483 484 485
Qed.
Lemma list_lookup_middle l1 l2 x n :
  n = length l1 → (l1 ++ x :: l2) !! n = Some x.
Proof. intros ->. by induction l1. Qed.

Lemma list_insert_alter l i x : <[i:=x]>l = alter (λ _, x) i l.
486
Proof. by revert i; induction l; intros []; intros; f_equal/=. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
487
Lemma alter_length f l i : length (alter f i l) = length l.
488
Proof. revert i. by induction l; intros [|?]; f_equal/=. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
489
Lemma insert_length l i x : length (<[i:=x]>l) = length l.
490
Proof. revert i. by induction l; intros [|?]; f_equal/=. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
491 492 493 494 495 496 497
Lemma list_lookup_alter f l i : alter f i l !! i = f <$> l !! i.
Proof. revert i. induction l. done. intros [|i]. done. apply (IHl i). Qed.
Lemma list_lookup_alter_ne f l i j : i ≠ j → alter f i l !! j = l !! j.
Proof.
  revert i j. induction l; [done|]. intros [][] ?; csimpl; auto with congruence.
Qed.
Lemma list_lookup_insert l i x : i < length l → <[i:=x]>l !! i = Some x.
498
Proof. revert i. induction l; intros [|?] ?; f_equal/=; auto with lia. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508
Lemma list_lookup_insert_ne l i j x : i ≠ j → <[i:=x]>l !! j = l !! j.
Proof.
  revert i j. induction l; [done|]. intros [] [] ?; simpl; auto with congruence.
Qed.
Lemma list_lookup_insert_Some l i x j y :
  <[i:=x]>l !! j = Some y ↔
    i = j ∧ x = y ∧ j < length l ∨ i ≠ j ∧ l !! j = Some y.
Proof.
  destruct (decide (i = j)) as [->|];
    [split|rewrite list_lookup_insert_ne by done; tauto].
509
  - intros Hy. assert (j < length l).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
510 511
    { rewrite <-(insert_length l j x); eauto using lookup_lt_Some. }
    rewrite list_lookup_insert in Hy by done; naive_solver.
512
  - intros [(?&?&?)|[??]]; rewrite ?list_lookup_insert; naive_solver.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
513 514 515
Qed.
Lemma list_insert_commute l i j x y :
  i ≠ j → <[i:=x]>(<[j:=y]>l) = <[j:=y]>(<[i:=x]>l).
516
Proof. revert i j. by induction l; intros [|?] [|?] ?; f_equal/=; auto. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
517 518 519
Lemma list_lookup_other l i x :
  length l ≠ 1 → l !! i = Some x → ∃ j y, j ≠ i ∧ l !! j = Some y.
Proof.
520
  intros. destruct i, l as [|x0 [|x1 l]]; simplify_eq/=.
521 522
  - by exists 1, x1.
  - by exists 0, x0.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
523 524 525
Qed.
Lemma alter_app_l f l1 l2 i :
  i < length l1 → alter f i (l1 ++ l2) = alter f i l1 ++ l2.
526
Proof. revert i. induction l1; intros [|?] ?; f_equal/=; auto with lia. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
527 528
Lemma alter_app_r f l1 l2 i :
  alter f (length l1 + i) (l1 ++ l2) = l1 ++ alter f i l2.
529
Proof. revert i. induction l1; intros [|?]; f_equal/=; auto. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
530 531 532 533 534 535 536
Lemma alter_app_r_alt f l1 l2 i :
  length l1 ≤ i → alter f i (l1 ++ l2) = l1 ++ alter f (i - length l1) l2.
Proof.
  intros. assert (i = length l1 + (i - length l1)) as Hi by lia.
  rewrite Hi at 1. by apply alter_app_r.
Qed.
Lemma list_alter_id f l i : (∀ x, f x = x) → alter f i l = l.
537
Proof. intros ?. revert i. induction l; intros [|?]; f_equal/=; auto. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
538 539
Lemma list_alter_ext f g l k i :
  (∀ x, l !! i = Some x → f x = g x) → l = k → alter f i l = alter g i k.
540
Proof. intros H ->. revert i H. induction k; intros [|?] ?; f_equal/=; auto. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
541 542
Lemma list_alter_compose f g l i :
  alter (f ∘ g) i l = alter f i (alter g i l).
543
Proof. revert i. induction l; intros [|?]; f_equal/=; auto. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
544 545
Lemma list_alter_commute f g l i j :
  i ≠ j → alter f i (alter g j l) = alter g j (alter f i l).
546
Proof. revert i j. induction l; intros [|?][|?] ?; f_equal/=; auto with lia. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
547 548
Lemma insert_app_l l1 l2 i x :
  i < length l1 → <[i:=x]>(l1 ++ l2) = <[i:=x]>l1 ++ l2.
549
Proof. revert i. induction l1; intros [|?] ?; f_equal/=; auto with lia. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
550
Lemma insert_app_r l1 l2 i x : <[length l1+i:=x]>(l1 ++ l2) = l1 ++ <[i:=x]>l2.
551
Proof. revert i. induction l1; intros [|?]; f_equal/=; auto. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
552 553 554 555 556 557 558
Lemma insert_app_r_alt l1 l2 i x :
  length l1 ≤ i → <[i:=x]>(l1 ++ l2) = l1 ++ <[i - length l1:=x]>l2.
Proof.
  intros. assert (i = length l1 + (i - length l1)) as Hi by lia.
  rewrite Hi at 1. by apply insert_app_r.
Qed.
Lemma delete_middle l1 l2 x : delete (length l1) (l1 ++ x :: l2) = l1 ++ l2.
559
Proof. induction l1; f_equal/=; auto. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597

Lemma inserts_length l i k : length (list_inserts i k l) = length l.
Proof.
  revert i. induction k; intros ?; csimpl; rewrite ?insert_length; auto.
Qed.
Lemma list_lookup_inserts l i k j :
  i ≤ j < i + length k → j < length l →
  list_inserts i k l !! j = k !! (j - i).
Proof.
  revert i j. induction k as [|y k IH]; csimpl; intros i j ??; [lia|].
  destruct (decide (i = j)) as [->|].
  { by rewrite list_lookup_insert, Nat.sub_diag
      by (rewrite inserts_length; lia). }
  rewrite list_lookup_insert_ne, IH by lia.
  by replace (j - i) with (S (j - S i)) by lia.
Qed.
Lemma list_lookup_inserts_lt l i k j :
  j < i → list_inserts i k l !! j = l !! j.
Proof.
  revert i j. induction k; intros i j ?; csimpl;
    rewrite ?list_lookup_insert_ne by lia; auto with lia.
Qed.
Lemma list_lookup_inserts_ge l i k j :
  i + length k ≤ j → list_inserts i k l !! j = l !! j.
Proof.
  revert i j. induction k; csimpl; intros i j ?;
    rewrite ?list_lookup_insert_ne by lia; auto with lia.
Qed.
Lemma list_lookup_inserts_Some l i k j y :
  list_inserts i k l !! j = Some y ↔
    (j < i ∨ i + length k ≤ j) ∧ l !! j = Some y ∨
    i ≤ j < i + length k ∧ j < length l ∧ k !! (j - i) = Some y.
Proof.
  destruct (decide (j < i)).
  { rewrite list_lookup_inserts_lt by done; intuition lia. }
  destruct (decide (i + length k ≤ j)).
  { rewrite list_lookup_inserts_ge by done; intuition lia. }
  split.
598
  - intros Hy. assert (j < length l).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
599 600
    { rewrite <-(inserts_length l i k); eauto using lookup_lt_Some. }
    rewrite list_lookup_inserts in Hy by lia. intuition lia.
601
  - intuition. by rewrite list_lookup_inserts by lia.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625
Qed.
Lemma list_insert_inserts_lt l i j x k :
  i < j → <[i:=x]>(list_inserts j k l) = list_inserts j k (<[i:=x]>l).
Proof.
  revert i j. induction k; intros i j ?; simpl;
    rewrite 1?list_insert_commute by lia; auto with f_equal.
Qed.

(** ** Properties of the [elem_of] predicate *)
Lemma not_elem_of_nil x : x ∉ [].
Proof. by inversion 1. Qed.
Lemma elem_of_nil x : x ∈ [] ↔ False.
Proof. intuition. by destruct (not_elem_of_nil x). Qed.
Lemma elem_of_nil_inv l : (∀ x, x ∉ l) → l = [].
Proof. destruct l. done. by edestruct 1; constructor. Qed.
Lemma elem_of_not_nil x l : x ∈ l → l ≠ [].
Proof. intros ? ->. by apply (elem_of_nil x). Qed.
Lemma elem_of_cons l x y : x ∈ y :: l ↔ x = y ∨ x ∈ l.
Proof. by split; [inversion 1; subst|intros [->|?]]; constructor. Qed.
Lemma not_elem_of_cons l x y : x ∉ y :: l ↔ x ≠ y ∧ x ∉ l.
Proof. rewrite elem_of_cons. tauto. Qed.
Lemma elem_of_app l1 l2 x : x ∈ l1 ++ l2 ↔ x ∈ l1 ∨ x ∈ l2.
Proof.
  induction l1.
626 627
  - split; [by right|]. intros [Hx|]; [|done]. by destruct (elem_of_nil x).
  - simpl. rewrite !elem_of_cons, IHl1. tauto.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637
Qed.
Lemma not_elem_of_app l1 l2 x : x ∉ l1 ++ l2 ↔ x ∉ l1 ∧ x ∉ l2.
Proof. rewrite elem_of_app. tauto. Qed.
Lemma elem_of_list_singleton x y : x ∈ [y] ↔ x = y.
Proof. rewrite elem_of_cons, elem_of_nil. tauto. Qed.
Global Instance elem_of_list_permutation_proper x : Proper ((≡ₚ) ==> iff) (x ∈).
Proof. induction 1; rewrite ?elem_of_nil, ?elem_of_cons; intuition. Qed.
Lemma elem_of_list_split l x : x ∈ l → ∃ l1 l2, l = l1 ++ x :: l2.
Proof.
  induction 1 as [x l|x y l ? [l1 [l2 ->]]]; [by eexists [], l|].
638
  by exists (y :: l1), l2.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646
Qed.
Lemma elem_of_list_lookup_1 l x : x ∈ l → ∃ i, l !! i = Some x.
Proof.
  induction 1 as [|???? IH]; [by exists 0 |].
  destruct IH as [i ?]; auto. by exists (S i).
Qed.
Lemma elem_of_list_lookup_2 l i x : l !! i = Some x → x ∈ l.
Proof.
647
  revert i. induction l; intros [|i] ?; simplify_eq/=; constructor; eauto.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
648 649 650 651 652 653 654
Qed.
Lemma elem_of_list_lookup l x : x ∈ l ↔ ∃ i, l !! i = Some x.
Proof. firstorder eauto using elem_of_list_lookup_1, elem_of_list_lookup_2. Qed.
Lemma elem_of_list_omap {B} (f : A → option B) l (y : B) :
  y ∈ omap f l ↔ ∃ x, x ∈ l ∧ f x = Some y.
Proof.
  split.
655
  - induction l as [|x l]; csimpl; repeat case_match; inversion 1; subst;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
656
      setoid_rewrite elem_of_cons; naive_solver.
657
  - intros (x&Hx&?). by induction Hx; csimpl; repeat case_match;
658
      simplify_eq; try constructor; auto.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674
Qed.

(** ** Properties of the [NoDup] predicate *)
Lemma NoDup_nil : NoDup (@nil A) ↔ True.
Proof. split; constructor. Qed.
Lemma NoDup_cons x l : NoDup (x :: l) ↔ x ∉ l ∧ NoDup l.
Proof. split. by inversion 1. intros [??]. by constructor. Qed.
Lemma NoDup_cons_11 x l : NoDup (x :: l) → x ∉ l.
Proof. rewrite NoDup_cons. by intros [??]. Qed.
Lemma NoDup_cons_12 x l : NoDup (x :: l) → NoDup l.
Proof. rewrite NoDup_cons. by intros [??]. Qed.
Lemma NoDup_singleton x : NoDup [x].
Proof. constructor. apply not_elem_of_nil. constructor. Qed.
Lemma NoDup_app l k : NoDup (l ++ k) ↔ NoDup l ∧ (∀ x, x ∈ l → x ∉ k) ∧ NoDup k.
Proof.
  induction l; simpl.
675 676
  - rewrite NoDup_nil. setoid_rewrite elem_of_nil. naive_solver.
  - rewrite !NoDup_cons.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
677 678 679 680 681
    setoid_rewrite elem_of_cons. setoid_rewrite elem_of_app. naive_solver.
Qed.
Global Instance NoDup_proper: Proper ((≡ₚ) ==> iff) (@NoDup A).
Proof.
  induction 1 as [|x l k Hlk IH | |].
682 683 684 685
  - by rewrite !NoDup_nil.
  - by rewrite !NoDup_cons, IH, Hlk.
  - rewrite !NoDup_cons, !elem_of_cons. intuition.
  - intuition.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
686 687 688 689 690
Qed.
Lemma NoDup_lookup l i j x :
  NoDup l → l !! i = Some x → l !! j = Some x → i = j.
Proof.
  intros Hl. revert i j. induction Hl as [|x' l Hx Hl IH].
691 692
  { intros; simplify_eq. }
  intros [|i] [|j] ??; simplify_eq/=; eauto with f_equal;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
693 694 695 696 697 698 699
    exfalso; eauto using elem_of_list_lookup_2.
Qed.
Lemma NoDup_alt l :
  NoDup l ↔ ∀ i j x, l !! i = Some x → l !! j = Some x → i = j.
Proof.
  split; eauto using NoDup_lookup.
  induction l as [|x l IH]; intros Hl; constructor.
700
  - rewrite elem_of_list_lookup. intros [i ?].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
701
    by feed pose proof (Hl (S i) 0 x); auto.
702
  - apply IH. intros i j x' ??. by apply (inj S), (Hl (S i) (S j) x').
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723
Qed.

Section no_dup_dec.
  Context `{!∀ x y, Decision (x = y)}.
  Global Instance NoDup_dec: ∀ l, Decision (NoDup l) :=
    fix NoDup_dec l :=
    match l return Decision (NoDup l) with
    | [] => left NoDup_nil_2
    | x :: l =>
      match decide_rel (∈) x l with
      | left Hin => right (λ H, NoDup_cons_11 _ _ H Hin)
      | right Hin =>
        match NoDup_dec l with
        | left H => left (NoDup_cons_2 _ _ Hin H)
        | right H => right (H ∘ NoDup_cons_12 _ _)
        end
      end
    end.
  Lemma elem_of_remove_dups l x : x ∈ remove_dups l ↔ x ∈ l.
  Proof.
    split; induction l; simpl; repeat case_decide;
724
      rewrite ?elem_of_cons; intuition (simplify_eq; auto).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743
  Qed.
  Lemma NoDup_remove_dups l : NoDup (remove_dups l).
  Proof.
    induction l; simpl; repeat case_decide; try constructor; auto.
    by rewrite elem_of_remove_dups.
  Qed.
End no_dup_dec.

(** ** Set operations on lists *)
Section list_set.
  Context {dec : ∀ x y, Decision (x = y)}.
  Lemma elem_of_list_difference l k x : x ∈ list_difference l k ↔ x ∈ l ∧ x ∉ k.
  Proof.
    split; induction l; simpl; try case_decide;
      rewrite ?elem_of_nil, ?elem_of_cons; intuition congruence.
  Qed.
  Lemma NoDup_list_difference l k : NoDup l → NoDup (list_difference l k).
  Proof.
    induction 1; simpl; try case_decide.
744 745 746
    - constructor.
    - done.
    - constructor. rewrite elem_of_list_difference; intuition. done.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755
  Qed.
  Lemma elem_of_list_union l k x : x ∈ list_union l k ↔ x ∈ l ∨ x ∈ k.
  Proof.
    unfold list_union. rewrite elem_of_app, elem_of_list_difference.
    intuition. case (decide (x ∈ k)); intuition.
  Qed.
  Lemma NoDup_list_union l k : NoDup l → NoDup k → NoDup (list_union l k).
  Proof.
    intros. apply NoDup_app. repeat split.
756 757 758
    - by apply NoDup_list_difference.
    - intro. rewrite elem_of_list_difference. intuition.
    - done.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768
  Qed.
  Lemma elem_of_list_intersection l k x :
    x ∈ list_intersection l k ↔ x ∈ l ∧ x ∈ k.
  Proof.
    split; induction l; simpl; repeat case_decide;
      rewrite ?elem_of_nil, ?elem_of_cons; intuition congruence.
  Qed.
  Lemma NoDup_list_intersection l k : NoDup l → NoDup (list_intersection l k).
  Proof.
    induction 1; simpl; try case_decide.
769 770 771
    - constructor.
    - constructor. rewrite elem_of_list_intersection; intuition. done.
    - done.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
772 773 774 775 776 777
  Qed.
  Lemma elem_of_list_intersection_with f l k x :
    x ∈ list_intersection_with f l k ↔ ∃ x1 x2,
      x1 ∈ l ∧ x2 ∈ k ∧ f x1 x2 = Some x.
  Proof.
    split.
778
    - induction l as [|x1 l IH]; simpl; [by rewrite elem_of_nil|].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
779 780 781 782 783 784
      intros Hx. setoid_rewrite elem_of_cons.
      cut ((∃ x2, x2 ∈ k ∧ f x1 x2 = Some x)
        ∨ x ∈ list_intersection_with f l k); [naive_solver|].
      clear IH. revert Hx. generalize (list_intersection_with f l k).
      induction k; simpl; [by auto|].
      case_match; setoid_rewrite elem_of_cons; naive_solver.
785
    - intros (x1&x2&Hx1&Hx2&Hx). induction Hx1 as [x1|x1 ? l ? IH]; simpl.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818
      + generalize (list_intersection_with f l k).
        induction Hx2; simpl; [by rewrite Hx; left |].
        case_match; simpl; try setoid_rewrite elem_of_cons; auto.
      + generalize (IH Hx). clear Hx IH Hx2.
        generalize (list_intersection_with f l k).
        induction k; simpl; intros; [done|].
        case_match; simpl; rewrite ?elem_of_cons; auto.
  Qed.
End list_set.

(** ** Properties of the [filter] function *)
Section filter.
  Context (P : A → Prop) `{∀ x, Decision (P x)}.
  Lemma elem_of_list_filter l x : x ∈ filter P l ↔ P x ∧ x ∈ l.
  Proof.
    unfold filter. induction l; simpl; repeat case_decide;
       rewrite ?elem_of_nil, ?elem_of_cons; naive_solver.
  Qed.
  Lemma NoDup_filter l : NoDup l → NoDup (filter P l).
  Proof.
    unfold filter. induction 1; simpl; repeat case_decide;
      rewrite ?NoDup_nil, ?NoDup_cons, ?elem_of_list_filter; tauto.
  Qed.
End filter.

(** ** Properties of the [find] function *)
Section find.
  Context (P : A → Prop) `{∀ x, Decision (P x)}.
  Lemma list_find_Some l i x :
    list_find P l = Some (i,x) → l !! i = Some x ∧ P x.
  Proof.
    revert i; induction l; intros [] ?;
      repeat (match goal with x : prod _ _ |- _ => destruct x end
819
              || simplify_option_eq); eauto.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
820 821 822
  Qed.
  Lemma list_find_elem_of l x : x ∈ l → P x → is_Some (list_find P l).
  Proof.
823
    induction 1 as [|x y l ? IH]; intros; simplify_option_eq; eauto.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
824 825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832 833 834 835 836 837 838 839 840 841 842 843 844 845 846 847 848 849 850 851 852
    by destruct IH as [[i x'] ->]; [|exists (S i, x')].
  Qed.
End find.

(** ** Properties of the [reverse] function *)
Lemma reverse_nil : reverse [] = @nil A.
Proof. done. Qed.
Lemma reverse_singleton x : reverse [x] = [x].
Proof. done. Qed.
Lemma reverse_cons l x : reverse (x :: l) = reverse l ++ [x].
Proof. unfold reverse. by rewrite <-!rev_alt. Qed.
Lemma reverse_snoc l x : reverse (l ++ [x]) = x :: reverse l.
Proof. unfold reverse. by rewrite <-!rev_alt, rev_unit. Qed.
Lemma reverse_app l1 l2 : reverse (l1 ++ l2) = reverse l2 ++ reverse l1.
Proof. unfold reverse. rewrite <-!rev_alt. apply rev_app_distr. Qed.
Lemma reverse_length l : length (reverse l) = length l.
Proof. unfold reverse. rewrite <-!rev_alt. apply rev_length. Qed.
Lemma reverse_involutive l : reverse (reverse l) = l.
Proof. unfold reverse. rewrite <-!rev_alt. apply rev_involutive. Qed.
Lemma elem_of_reverse_2 x l : x ∈ l → x ∈ reverse l.
Proof.
  induction 1; rewrite reverse_cons, elem_of_app,
    ?elem_of_list_singleton; intuition.
Qed.
Lemma elem_of_reverse x l : x ∈ reverse l ↔ x ∈ l.
Proof.
  split; auto using elem_of_reverse_2.
  intros. rewrite <-(reverse_involutive l). by apply elem_of_reverse_2.
Qed.
853
Global Instance: Inj (=) (=) (@reverse A).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
854 855 856 857 858 859 860 861 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 875 876 877 878 879
Proof.
  intros l1 l2 Hl.
  by rewrite <-(reverse_involutive l1), <-(reverse_involutive l2), Hl.
Qed.
Lemma sum_list_with_app (f : A → nat) l k :
  sum_list_with f (l ++ k) = sum_list_with f l + sum_list_with f k.
Proof. induction l; simpl; lia. Qed.
Lemma sum_list_with_reverse (f : A → nat) l :
  sum_list_with f (reverse l) = sum_list_with f l.
Proof.
  induction l; simpl; rewrite ?reverse_cons, ?sum_list_with_app; simpl; lia.
Qed.

(** ** Properties of the [last] function *)
Lemma last_snoc x l : last (l ++ [x]) = Some x.
Proof. induction l as [|? []]; simpl; auto. Qed.
Lemma last_reverse l : last (reverse l) = head l.
Proof. by destruct l as [|x l]; rewrite ?reverse_cons, ?last_snoc. Qed.
Lemma head_reverse l : head (reverse l) = last l.
Proof. by rewrite <-last_reverse, reverse_involutive. Qed.

(** ** Properties of the [take] function *)
Definition take_drop i l : take i l ++ drop i l = l := firstn_skipn i l.
Lemma take_drop_middle l i x :
  l !! i = Some x → take i l ++ x :: drop (S i) l = l.
Proof.
880
  revert i x. induction l; intros [|?] ??; simplify_eq/=; f_equal; auto.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
881 882 883 884
Qed.
Lemma take_nil n : take n (@nil A) = [].
Proof. by destruct n. Qed.
Lemma take_app l k : take (length l) (l ++ k) = l.
885
Proof. induction l; f_equal/=; auto. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
886 887 888
Lemma take_app_alt l k n : n = length l → take n (l ++ k) = l.
Proof. intros ->. by apply take_app. Qed.
Lemma take_app3_alt l1 l2 l3 n : n = length l1 → take n ((l1 ++ l2) ++ l3) = l1.
889
Proof. intros ->. by rewrite <-(assoc_L (++)), take_app. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
890
Lemma take_app_le l k n : n ≤ length l → take n (l ++ k) = take n l.
891
Proof. revert n. induction l; intros [|?] ?; f_equal/=; auto with lia. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
892 893
Lemma take_plus_app l k n m :
  length l = n → take (n + m) (l ++ k) = l ++ take m k.
894
Proof. intros <-. induction l; f_equal/=; auto. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
895 896
Lemma take_app_ge l k n :
  length l ≤ n → take n (l ++ k) = l ++ take (n - length l) k.
897
Proof. revert n. induction l; intros [|?] ?; f_equal/=; auto with lia. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
898
Lemma take_ge l n : length l ≤ n → take n l = l.
899
Proof. revert n. induction l; intros [|?] ?; f_equal/=; auto with lia. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
900
Lemma take_take l n m : take n (take m l) = take (min n m) l.
901
Proof. revert n m. induction l; intros [|?] [|?]; f_equal/=; auto. Qed.
902
Lemma take_idemp l n : take n (take n l) = take n l.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
903 904
Proof. by rewrite take_take, Min.min_idempotent. Qed.
Lemma take_length l n : length (take n l) = min n (length l).
905
Proof. revert n. induction l; intros [|?]; f_equal/=; done. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
906 907 908 909 910 911 912 913 914 915 916 917 918 919 920
Lemma take_length_le l n : n ≤ length l → length (take n l) = n.
Proof. rewrite take_length. apply Min.min_l. Qed.
Lemma take_length_ge l n : length l ≤ n → length (take n l) = length l.
Proof. rewrite take_length. apply Min.min_r. Qed.
Lemma take_drop_commute l n m : take n (drop m l) = drop m (take (m + n) l).
Proof.
  revert n m. induction l; intros [|?][|?]; simpl; auto using take_nil with lia.
Qed.
Lemma lookup_take l n i : i < n → take n l !! i = l !! i.
Proof. revert n i. induction l; intros [|n] [|i] ?; simpl; auto with lia. Qed.
Lemma lookup_take_ge l n i : n ≤ i → take n l !! i = None.
Proof. revert n i. induction l; intros [|?] [|?] ?; simpl; auto with lia. Qed.
Lemma take_alter f l n i : n ≤ i → take n (alter f i l) = take n l.
Proof.
  intros. apply list_eq. intros j. destruct (le_lt_dec n j).
921 922
  - by rewrite !lookup_take_ge.
  - by rewrite !lookup_take, !list_lookup_alter_ne by lia.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
923 924 925 926
Qed.
Lemma take_insert l n i x : n ≤ i → take n (<[i:=x]>l) = take n l.
Proof.
  intros. apply list_eq. intros j. destruct (le_lt_dec n j).
927 928
  - by rewrite !lookup_take_ge.
  - by rewrite !lookup_take, !list_lookup_insert_ne by lia.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
929 930 931 932 933 934 935 936
Qed.

(** ** Properties of the [drop] function *)
Lemma drop_0 l : drop 0 l = l.
Proof. done. Qed.
Lemma drop_nil n : drop n (@nil A) = [].
Proof. by destruct n. Qed.
Lemma drop_length l n : length (drop n l) = length l - n.
937
Proof. revert n. by induction l; intros [|i]; f_equal/=. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
938 939 940 941 942 943 944 945 946 947 948 949 950 951 952
Lemma drop_ge l n : length l ≤ n → drop n l = [].
Proof. revert n. induction l; intros [|??]; simpl in *; auto with lia. Qed.
Lemma drop_all l : drop (length l) l = [].
Proof. by apply drop_ge. Qed.
Lemma drop_drop l n1 n2 : drop n1 (drop n2 l) = drop (n2 + n1) l.
Proof. revert n2. induction l; intros [|?]; simpl; rewrite ?drop_nil; auto. Qed.
Lemma drop_app_le l k n :
  n ≤ length l → drop n (l ++ k) = drop n l ++ k.
Proof. revert n. induction l; intros [|?]; simpl; auto with lia. Qed.
Lemma drop_app l k : drop (length l) (l ++ k) = k.
Proof. by rewrite drop_app_le, drop_all. Qed.
Lemma drop_app_alt l k n : n = length l → drop n (l ++ k) = k.
Proof. intros ->. by apply drop_app. Qed.
Lemma drop_app3_alt l1 l2 l3 n :
  n = length l1 → drop n ((l1 ++ l2) ++ l3) = l2 ++ l3.
953
Proof. intros ->. by rewrite <-(assoc_L (++)), drop_app. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
954 955 956 957 958 959 960 961 962 963 964 965 966 967 968 969 970 971 972 973 974 975
Lemma drop_app_ge l k n :
  length l ≤ n → drop n (l ++ k) = drop (n - length l) k.
Proof.
  intros. rewrite <-(Nat.sub_add (length l) n) at 1 by done.
  by rewrite Nat.add_comm, <-drop_drop, drop_app.
Qed.
Lemma drop_plus_app l k n m :
  length l = n → drop (n + m) (l ++ k) = drop m k.
Proof. intros <-. by rewrite <-drop_drop, drop_app. Qed.
Lemma lookup_drop l n i : drop n l !! i = l !! (n + i).
Proof. revert n i. induction l; intros [|i] ?; simpl; auto. Qed.
Lemma drop_alter f l n i : i < n → drop n (alter f i l) = drop n l.
Proof.
  intros. apply list_eq. intros j.
  by rewrite !lookup_drop, !list_lookup_alter_ne by lia.
Qed.
Lemma drop_insert l n i x : i < n → drop n (<[i:=x]>l) = drop n l.
Proof.
  intros. apply list_eq. intros j.
  by rewrite !lookup_drop, !list_lookup_insert_ne by lia.
Qed.
Lemma delete_take_drop l i : delete i l = take i l ++ drop (S i) l.
976
Proof. revert i. induction l; intros [|?]; f_equal/=; auto. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
977
Lemma take_take_drop l n m : take n l ++ take m (drop n l) = take (n + m) l.
978
Proof. revert n m. induction l; intros [|?] [|?]; f_equal/=; auto. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
979 980 981
Lemma drop_take_drop l n m : n ≤ m → drop n (take m l) ++ drop m l = drop n l.
Proof.
  revert n m. induction l; intros [|?] [|?] ?;
982
    f_equal/=; auto using take_drop with lia.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
983 984 985 986 987 988 989 990 991
Qed.

(** ** Properties of the [replicate] function *)
Lemma replicate_length n x : length (replicate n x) = n.
Proof. induction n; simpl; auto. Qed.
Lemma lookup_replicate n x y i :
  replicate n x !! i = Some y ↔ y = x ∧ i < n.
Proof.
  split.
992 993
  - revert i. induction n; intros [|?]; naive_solver auto with lia.
  - intros [-> Hi]. revert i Hi.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
994 995 996 997 998 999 1000 1001 1002 1003
    induction n; intros [|?]; naive_solver auto with lia.
Qed.
Lemma lookup_replicate_1 n x y i :
  replicate n x !! i = Some y → y = x ∧ i < n.
Proof. by rewrite lookup_replicate. Qed.
Lemma lookup_replicate_2 n x i : i < n → replicate n x !! i = Some x.
Proof. by rewrite lookup_replicate. Qed.
Lemma lookup_replicate_None n x i : n ≤ i ↔ replicate n x !! i = None.
Proof.
  rewrite eq_None_not_Some, Nat.le_ngt. split.
1004 1005
  - intros Hin [x' Hx']; destruct Hin. rewrite lookup_replicate in Hx'; tauto.
  - intros Hx ?. destruct Hx. exists x; auto using lookup_replicate_2.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
1006 1007
Qed.
Lemma insert_replicate x n i : <[i:=x]>(replicate n x) = replicate n x.
1008
Proof. revert i. induction n; intros [|?]; f_equal/=; auto. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
1009 1010 1011 1012 1013 1014
Lemma elem_of_replicate_inv x n y : x ∈ replicate n y → x = y.
Proof. induction n; simpl; rewrite ?elem_of_nil, ?elem_of_cons; intuition. Qed.
Lemma replicate_S n x : replicate (S n) x = x :: replicate  n x.
Proof. done. Qed.
Lemma replicate_plus n m x :
  replicate (n + m) x = replicate n x ++ replicate m x.
1015
Proof. induction n; f_equal/=; auto. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
1016
Lemma take_replicate n m x : take n (replicate m x) = replicate (min n m) x.
1017
Proof. revert m. by induction n; intros [|?]; f_equal/=. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
1018 1019 1020
Lemma take_replicate_plus n m x : take n (replicate (n + m) x) = replicate n x.
Proof. by rewrite take_replicate, min_l by lia. Qed.
Lemma drop_replicate n m x : drop n (replicate m x) = replicate (m - n) x.
1021
Proof. revert m. by induction n; intros [|?]; f_equal/=. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
1022 1023 1024 1025 1026 1027
Lemma drop_replicate_plus n m x : drop n (replicate (n + m) x) = replicate m x.
Proof. rewrite drop_replicate. f_equal. lia. Qed.
Lemma replicate_as_elem_of x n l :
  replicate n x = l ↔ length l = n ∧ ∀ y, y ∈ l → y = x.
Proof.
  split; [intros <-; eauto using elem_of_replicate_inv, replicate_length|].
1028
  intros [<- Hl]. symmetry. induction l as [|y l IH]; f_equal/=.
1029 1030
  - apply Hl. by left.
  - apply IH. intros ??. apply Hl. by right.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
1031 1032 1033 1034 1035 1036 1037 1038 1039 1040 1041 1042
Qed.
Lemma reverse_replicate n x : reverse (replicate n x) = replicate n x.
Proof.
  symmetry. apply replicate_as_elem_of.
  rewrite reverse_length, replicate_length. split; auto.
  intros y. rewrite elem_of_reverse. by apply elem_of_replicate_inv.
Qed.
Lemma replicate_false βs n : length βs = n → replicate n false =.>* βs.
Proof. intros <-. by induction βs; simpl; constructor. Qed.

(** ** Properties of the [resize] function *)
Lemma resize_spec l n x : resize n x l = take n l ++ replicate (n - length l) x.
1043
Proof. revert n. induction l; intros [|?]; f_equal/=; auto. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
1044 1045 1046
Lemma resize_0 l x : resize 0 x l = [].
Proof. by destruct l. Qed.
Lemma resize_nil n x : resize n x [] = replicate n x.
1047
Proof. rewrite resize_spec. rewrite take_nil. f_equal/=. lia. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
1048 1049 1050 1051 1052 1053 1054 1055 1056 1057 1058 1059 1060 1061 1062
Lemma resize_ge l n x :
  length l ≤ n → resize n x l = l ++ replicate (n - length l) x.
Proof. intros. by rewrite resize_spec, take_ge. Qed.
Lemma resize_le l n x : n ≤ length l → resize n x l = take n l.
Proof.
  intros. rewrite resize_spec, (proj2 (Nat.sub_0_le _ _)) by done.
  simpl. by rewrite (right_id_L [] (++)).
Qed.
Lemma resize_all l x : resize (length l) x l = l.
Proof. intros. by rewrite resize_le, take_ge. Qed.
Lemma resize_all_alt l n x : n = length l → resize n x l = l.
Proof. intros ->. by rewrite resize_all. Qed.
Lemma resize_plus l n m x :
  resize (n + m) x l = resize n x l ++ resize m x (drop n l).
Proof.
1063
  revert n m. induction l; intros [|?] [|?]; f_equal/=; auto.
1064 1065
  - by rewrite Nat.add_0_r, (right_id_L [] (++)).
  - by rewrite replicate_plus.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
1066 1067 1068 1069 1070 1071 1072 1073 1074 1075 1076 1077 1078 1079
Qed.
Lemma resize_plus_eq l n m x :
  length l = n → resize (n + m) x l = l ++ replicate m x.
Proof. intros <-. by rewrite resize_plus, resize_all, drop_all, resize_nil. Qed.
Lemma resize_app_le l1 l2 n x :
  n ≤ length l1 → resize n x (l1 ++ l2) = resize n x l1.
Proof.
  intros. by rewrite !resize_le, take_app_le by (rewrite ?app_length; lia).
Qed.
Lemma resize_app l1 l2 n x : n = length l1 → resize n x (l1 ++ l2) = l1.
Proof. intros ->. by rewrite resize_app_le, resize_all. Qed.
Lemma resize_app_ge l1 l2 n x :
  length l1 ≤ n → resize n x (l1 ++ l2) = l1 ++ resize (n - length l1) x l2.
Proof.
1080
  intros. rewrite !resize_spec, take_app_ge, (assoc_L (++)) by done.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
1081 1082 1083 1084 1085
  do 2 f_equal. rewrite app_length. lia.
Qed.
Lemma resize_length l n x : length (resize n x l) = n.
Proof. rewrite resize_spec, app_length, replicate_length, take_length. lia. Qed.
Lemma resize_replicate x n m : resize n x (replicate m x) = replicate n x.
1086
Proof. revert m. induction n; intros [|?]; f_equal/=; auto. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
1087 1088 1089
Lemma resize_resize l n m x : n ≤ m → resize n x (resize m x l) = resize n x l.
Proof.
  revert n m. induction l; simpl.
1090
  - intros. by rewrite !resize_nil, resize_replicate.
1091
  - intros [|?] [|?] ?; f_equal/=; auto with lia.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
1092
Qed.
1093
Lemma resize_idemp l n x : resize n x (resize n x l) = resize n x l.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
1094 1095
Proof. by rewrite resize_resize. Qed.
Lemma resize_take_le l n m x : n ≤ m → resize n x (take m l) = resize n x l.
1096
Proof. revert n m. induction l; intros [|?][|?] ?; f_equal/=; auto with lia. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
1097 1098 1099 1100
Lemma resize_take_eq l n x : resize n x (take n l) = resize n x l.
Proof. by rewrite resize_take_le. Qed.
Lemma take_resize l n m x : take n (resize m x l) = resize (min n m) x l.
Proof.
1101
  revert n m. induction l; intros [|?][|?]; f_equal/=; auto using take_replicate.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
1102 1103 1104 1105 1106 1107 1108 1109 1110 1111 1112
Qed.
Lemma take_resize_le l n m x : n ≤ m → take n (resize m x l) = resize n x l.
Proof. intros. by rewrite take_resize, Min.min_l. Qed.
Lemma take_resize_eq l n x : take n (resize n x l) = resize n x l.
Proof. intros. by rewrite take_resize, Min.min_l. Qed.
Lemma take_resize_plus l n m x : take n (resize (n + m) x l) = resize n x l.
Proof. by rewrite take_resize, min_l by lia. Qed.
Lemma drop_resize_le l n m x :
  n ≤ m → drop n (resize m x l) = resize (m - n) x (drop n l).
Proof.
  revert n m. induction l; simpl.
1113 1114
  - intros. by rewrite drop_nil, !resize_nil, drop_replicate.
  - intros [|?] [|?] ?; simpl; try case_match; auto with lia.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
1115 1116 1117 1118 1119 1120 1121
Qed.
Lemma drop_resize_plus l n m x :
  drop n (resize (n + m) x l) = resize m x (drop n l).
Proof. rewrite drop_resize_le by lia. f_equal. lia. Qed.
Lemma lookup_resize l n x i : i < n → i < length l → resize n x l !! i = l !! i.
Proof.
  intros ??. destruct (decide (n < length l)).
1122 1123
  - by rewrite resize_le, lookup_take by lia.
  - by rewrite resize_ge, lookup_app_l by lia.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
1124 1125 1126 1127 1128 1129 1130 1131 1132 1133 1134 1135 1136 1137 1138 1139 1140 1141 1142
Qed.
Lemma lookup_resize_new l n x i :
  length l ≤ i → i < n → resize n x l !! i = Some x.
Proof.
  intros ??. rewrite resize_ge by lia.
  replace i with (length l + (i - length l)) by lia.
  by rewrite lookup_app_r, lookup_replicate_2 by lia.
Qed.
Lemma lookup_resize_old l n x i : n ≤ i → resize n x l !! i = None.
Proof. intros ?. apply lookup_ge_None_2. by rewrite resize_length. Qed.
End general_properties.

Section more_general_properties.
Context {A : Type}.
Implicit Types x y z : A.
Implicit Types l k : list A.

(** ** Properties of the [reshape] function *)
Lemma reshape_length szs l : length (reshape szs l) = length szs.
1143
Proof. revert l. by induction szs; intros; f_equal/=. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
1144 1145 1146 1147 1148 1149 1150 1151 1152 1153 1154 1155 1156
Lemma join_reshape szs l :
  sum_list szs = length l → mjoin (reshape szs l) = l.
Proof.
  revert l. induction szs as [|sz szs IH]; simpl; intros l Hl; [by destruct l|].
  by rewrite IH, take_drop by (rewrite drop_length; lia).
Qed.
Lemma sum_list_replicate n m : sum_list (replicate m n) = m * n.
Proof. induction m; simpl; auto. Qed.

(** ** Properties of [sublist_lookup] and [sublist_alter] *)
Lemma sublist_lookup_length l i n k :
  sublist_lookup i n l = Some k → length k = n.
Proof.
1157
  unfold sublist_lookup; intros; simplify_option_eq.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
1158 1159 1160 1161 1162 1163 1164 1165 1166
  rewrite take_length, drop_length; lia.
Qed.
Lemma sublist_lookup_all l n : length l = n → sublist_lookup 0 n l = Some l.
Proof.
  intros. unfold sublist_lookup; case_option_guard; [|lia].
  by rewrite take_ge by (rewrite drop_length; lia).
Qed.
Lemma sublist_lookup_Some l i n :
  i + n ≤ length l → sublist_lookup i n l = Some (take n (drop i l)).
1167
Proof. by unfold sublist_lookup; intros; simplify_option_eq. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
1168 1169
Lemma sublist_lookup_None l i n :
  length l < i + n → sublist_lookup i n l = None.
1170
Proof. by unfold sublist_lookup; intros; simplify_option_eq by lia. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
1171 1172 1173 1174 1175 1176 1177 1178 1179 1180 1181 1182 1183 1184
Lemma sublist_eq l k n :
  (n | length l) → (n | length k) →
  (∀ i, sublist_lookup (i * n) n l = sublist_lookup (i * n) n k) → l = k.
Proof.
  revert l k. assert (∀ l i,
    n ≠ 0 → (n | length l) → ¬n * i `div` n + n ≤ length l → length l ≤ i).
  { intros l i ? [j ->] Hjn. apply Nat.nlt_ge; contradict Hjn.
    rewrite <-Nat.mul_succ_r, (Nat.mul_comm n).
    apply Nat.mul_le_mono_r, Nat.le_succ_l, Nat.div_lt_upper_bound; lia. }
  intros l k Hl Hk Hlookup. destruct (decide (n = 0)) as [->|].
  { by rewrite (nil_length_inv l),
      (nil_length_inv k) by eauto using Nat.divide_0_l. }
  apply list_eq; intros i. specialize (Hlookup (i `div` n)).
  rewrite (Nat.mul_comm _ n) in Hlookup.
1185
  unfold sublist_lookup in *; simplify_option_eq;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
1186 1187 1188 1189 1190 1191 1192 1193 1194 1195 1196 1197 1198 1199 1200 1201 1202 1203 1204 1205 1206 1207 1208
    [|by rewrite !lookup_ge_None_2 by auto].
  apply (f_equal (!! i `mod` n)) in Hlookup.
  by rewrite !lookup_take, !lookup_drop, <-!Nat.div_mod in Hlookup
    by (auto using Nat.mod_upper_bound with lia).
Qed.
Lemma sublist_eq_same_length l k j n :
  length l = j * n → length k = j * n →
  (∀ i,i < j → sublist_lookup (i * n) n l = sublist_lookup (i * n) n k) → l = k.
Proof.
  intros Hl Hk ?. destruct (decide (n = 0)) as [->|].
  { by rewrite (nil_length_inv l), (nil_length_inv k) by lia. }
  apply sublist_eq with n; [by exists j|by exists j|].
  intros i. destruct (decide (i < j)); [by auto|].
  assert (∀ m, m = j * n → m < i * n + n).
  { intros ? ->. replace (i * n + n) with (S i * n) by lia.
    apply Nat.mul_lt_mono_pos_r; lia. }
  by rewrite !sublist_lookup_None by auto.
Qed.
Lemma sublist_lookup_reshape l i n m :
  0 < n → length l = m * n →
  reshape (replicate m n) l !! i = sublist_lookup (i * n) n l.
Proof.
  intros Hn Hl. unfold sublist_lookup.  apply option_eq; intros x; split.
1209
  - intros Hx. case_option_guard as Hi.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
1210
    { f_equal. clear Hi. revert i l Hl Hx.
1211
      induction m as [|m IH]; intros [|i] l ??; simplify_eq/=; auto.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
1212 1213 1214 1215
      rewrite <-drop_drop. apply IH; rewrite ?drop_length; auto with lia. }
    destruct Hi. rewrite Hl, <-Nat.mul_succ_l.
    apply Nat.mul_le_mono_r, Nat.le_succ_l. apply lookup_lt_Some in Hx.
    by rewrite reshape_length, replicate_length in Hx.
1216
  - intros Hx. case_option_guard as Hi; simplify_eq/=.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
1217 1218 1219 1220 1221 1222 1223 1224
    revert i l Hl Hi. induction m as [|m IH]; [auto with lia|].
    intros [|i] l ??; simpl; [done|]. rewrite <-drop_drop.
    rewrite IH; rewrite ?drop_length; auto with lia.
Qed.
Lemma sublist_lookup_compose l1 l2 l3 i n j m :
  sublist_lookup i n l1 = Some l2 → sublist_lookup j m l2 = Some l3 →
  sublist_lookup (i + j) m l1 = Some l3.
Proof.
1225
  unfold sublist_lookup; intros; simplify_option_eq;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
1226 1227 1228 1229 1230 1231 1232 1233 1234
    repeat match goal with
    | H : _ ≤ length _ |- _ => rewrite take_length, drop_length in H
    end; rewrite ?take_drop_commute, ?drop_drop, ?take_take,
      ?Min.min_l, Nat.add_assoc by lia; auto with lia.
Qed.
Lemma sublist_alter_length f l i n k :
  sublist_lookup i n l = Some k → length (f k) = n →
  length (sublist_alter f i n l) = length l.
Proof.
1235
  unfold sublist_alter, sublist_lookup. intros Hk ?; simplify_option_eq.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
1236 1237 1238 1239 1240 1241 1242
  rewrite !app_length, Hk, !take_length, !drop_length; lia.
Qed.
Lemma sublist_lookup_alter f l i n k :
  sublist_lookup i n l = Some k → length (f k) = n →
  sublist_lookup i n (sublist_alter f i n l) = f <$> sublist_lookup i n l.
Proof.
  unfold sublist_lookup. intros Hk ?. erewrite sublist_alter_length by eauto.
1243
  unfold sublist_alter; simplify_option_eq.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
1244 1245 1246 1247 1248 1249 1250
  by rewrite Hk, drop_app_alt, take_app_alt by (rewrite ?take_length; lia).
Qed.
Lemma sublist_lookup_alter_ne f l i j n k :
  sublist_lookup j n l = Some k → length (f k) = n → i + n ≤ j ∨ j + n ≤ i →
  sublist_lookup i n (sublist_alter f j n l) = sublist_lookup i n l.
Proof.
  unfold sublist_lookup. intros Hk Hi ?. erewrite sublist_alter_length by eauto.
1251
  unfold sublist_alter; simplify_option_eq; f_equal; rewrite Hk.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
1252 1253 1254 1255 1256 1257 1258 1259 1260 1261 1262 1263 1264 1265 1266 1267
  apply list_eq; intros ii.
  destruct (decide (ii < length (f k))); [|by rewrite !lookup_take_ge by lia].
  rewrite !lookup_take, !lookup_drop by done. destruct (decide (i + ii < j)).
  { by rewrite lookup_app_l, lookup_take by (rewrite ?take_length; lia). }
  rewrite lookup_app_r by (rewrite take_length; lia).
  rewrite take_length_le, lookup_app_r, lookup_drop by lia. f_equal; lia.
Qed.
Lemma sublist_alter_all f l n : length l = n → sublist_alter f 0 n l = f l.
Proof.
  intros <-. unfold sublist_alter; simpl.
  by rewrite drop_all, (right_id_L [] (++)), take_ge.
Qed.
Lemma sublist_alter_compose f g l i n k :
  sublist_lookup i n l = Some k → length (f k) = n → length (g k) = n →
  sublist_alter (f ∘ g) i n l = sublist_alter f i n (sublist_alter g i n l).
Proof.
1268
  unfold sublist_alter, sublist_lookup. intros Hk ??; simplify_option_eq.
1269
  by rewrite !take_app_alt, drop_app_alt, !(assoc_L (++)), drop_app_alt,
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
1270 1271 1272 1273 1274 1275 1276
    take_app_alt by (rewrite ?app_length, ?take_length, ?Hk; lia).
Qed.

(** ** Properties of the [mask] function *)
Lemma mask_nil f βs : mask f βs (@nil A) = [].
Proof. by destruct βs. Qed.
Lemma mask_length f βs l : length (mask f βs l) = length l.
1277
Proof. revert βs. induction l; intros [|??]; f_equal/=; auto. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
1278
Lemma mask_true f l n : length l ≤ n → mask f (replicate n true) l = f <$> l.
1279
Proof. revert n. induction l; intros [|?] ?; f_equal/=; auto with lia. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
1280
Lemma mask_false f l n : mask f (replicate n false) l = l.
1281
Proof. revert l. induction n; intros [|??]; f_equal/=; auto. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
1282 1283 1284
Lemma mask_app f βs1 βs2 l :
  mask f (βs1 ++ βs2) l
  = mask f βs1 (take (length βs1) l) ++ mask f βs2 (drop (length βs1) l).
1285
Proof. revert l. induction βs1;intros [|??]; f_equal/=; auto using mask_nil. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
1286 1287 1288
Lemma mask_app_2 f βs l1 l2 :
  mask f βs (l1 ++ l2)
  = mask f (take (length l1) βs) l1 ++ mask f (drop (length l1) βs) l2.
1289
Proof. revert βs. induction l1; intros [|??]; f_equal/=; auto. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
1290
Lemma take_mask f βs l n : take n (mask f βs l) = mask f (take n βs) (take n l).
1291
Proof. revert n βs. induction l; intros [|?] [|[] ?]; f_equal/=; auto. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
1292 1293
Lemma drop_mask f βs l n : drop n (mask f βs l) = mask f (drop n βs) (drop n l).
Proof.
1294
  revert n βs. induction l; intros [|?] [|[] ?]; f_equal/=; auto using mask_nil.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
1295 1296 1297 1298 1299
Qed.
Lemma sublist_lookup_mask f βs l i n :
  sublist_lookup i n (mask f βs l)
  = mask f (take n (drop i βs)) <$> sublist_lookup i n l.
Proof.
1300
  unfold sublist_lookup; rewrite mask_length; simplify_option_eq; auto.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
1301 1302 1303 1304 1305 1306
  by rewrite drop_mask, take_mask.
Qed.
Lemma mask_mask f g βs1 βs2 l :
  (∀ x, f (g x) = f x) → βs1 =.>* βs2 →
  mask f βs2 (mask g βs1 l) = mask f βs2 l.
Proof.
1307
  intros ? Hβs. revert l. by induction Hβs as [|[] []]; intros [|??]; f_equal/=.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
1308 1309 1310 1311
Qed.
Lemma lookup_mask f βs l i :
  βs !! i = Some true → mask f βs l !! i = f <$> l !! i.
Proof.
1312
  revert i βs. induction l; intros [] [] ?; simplify_eq/=; f_equal; auto.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
1313 1314 1315 1316
Qed.
Lemma lookup_mask_notin f βs l i :
  βs !! i ≠ Some true → mask f βs l !! i = l !! i.
Proof.
1317
  revert i βs. induction l; intros [] [|[]] ?; simplify_eq/=; auto.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
1318 1319 1320 1321
Qed.

(** ** Properties of the [seq] function *)
Lemma fmap_seq j n : S <$> seq j n = seq (S j) n.
1322
Proof. revert j. induction n; intros; f_equal/=; auto. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
1323 1324 1325 1326 1327 1328 1329 1330 1331 1332 1333 1334 1335 1336 1337 1338 1339 1340 1341 1342 1343 1344 1345 1346 1347
Lemma lookup_seq j n i : i < n → seq j n !! i = Some (j + i).
Proof.
  revert j i. induction n as [|n IH]; intros j [|i] ?; simpl; auto with lia.
  rewrite IH; auto with lia.
Qed.
Lemma lookup_seq_ge j n i : n ≤ i → seq j n !! i = None.
Proof. revert j i. induction n; intros j [|i] ?; simpl; auto with lia. Qed.
Lemma lookup_seq_inv j n i j' : seq j n !! i = Some j' → j' = j + i ∧ i < n.
Proof.
  destruct (le_lt_dec n i); [by rewrite lookup_seq_ge|].
  rewrite lookup_seq by done. intuition congruence.
Qed.

(** ** Properties of the [Permutation] predicate *)
Lemma Permutation_nil l : l ≡ₚ [] ↔ l = [].
Proof. split. by intro; apply Permutation_nil. by intros ->. Qed.
Lemma Permutation_singleton l x : l ≡ₚ [x] ↔ l = [x].
Proof. split. by intro; apply Permutation_length_1_inv. by intros ->. Qed.
Definition Permutation_skip := @perm_skip A.
Definition Permutation_swap := @perm_swap A.
Definition Permutation_singleton_inj := @Permutation_length_1 A.

Global Existing Instance Permutation_app'.
Global Instance: Proper ((≡ₚ) ==> (=)) (@length A).
Proof. induction 1; simpl; auto with lia. Qed.
1348
Global Instance: Comm (≡ₚ) (@app A).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
1349 1350
Proof.
  intros l1. induction l1 as [|x l1 IH]; intros l2; simpl.
1351 1352
  - by rewrite (right_id_L [] (++)).
  - rewrite Permutation_middle, IH. simpl. by rewrite Permutation_middle.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
1353
Qed.
1354
Global Instance: ∀ x : A, Inj (≡ₚ) (≡ₚ) (x ::).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
1355
Proof. red. eauto using Permutation_cons_inv. Qed.
1356
Global Instance: ∀ k : list A, Inj (≡ₚ) (≡ₚ) (k ++).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
1357 1358
Proof.
  red. induction k as [|x k IH]; intros l1 l2; simpl; auto.
1359
  intros. by apply IH, (inj (x ::)).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
1360
Qed.
1361
Global Instance: ∀ k : list A, Inj (≡ₚ) (≡ₚ) (++ k).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
1362
Proof.
1363
  intros k l1 l2. rewrite !(comm (++) _ k). by apply (inj (k ++)).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
1364 1365 1366 1367
Qed.
Lemma replicate_Permutation n x l : replicate n x ≡ₚ l → replicate n x = l.
Proof.
  intros Hl. apply replicate_as_elem_of. split.
1368 1369
  - by rewrite <-Hl, replicate_length.
  - intros y. rewrite <-Hl. by apply elem_of_replicate_inv.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
1370 1371 1372 1373
Qed.
Lemma reverse_Permutation l : reverse l ≡ₚ l.
Proof.
  induction l as [|x l IH]; [done|].
1374
  by rewrite reverse_cons, (comm (++)), IH.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
1375
Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
1376 1377
Lemma delete_Permutation l i x : l !! i = Some x → l ≡ₚ x :: delete i l.
Proof.
1378
  revert i; induction l as [|y l IH]; intros [|i] ?; simplify_eq/=; auto.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
1379 1380
  by rewrite Permutation_swap, <-(IH i).
Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
1381 1382 1383 1384 1385

(** ** Properties of the [prefix_of] and [suffix_of] predicates *)
Global Instance: PreOrder (@prefix_of A).
Proof.
  split.
1386 1387
  - intros ?. eexists []. by rewrite (right_id_L [] (++)).
  - intros ???[k1->] [k2->]. exists (k1 ++ k2). by rewrite (assoc_L (++)).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
1388 1389 1390 1391 1392 1393 1394 1395 1396 1397 1398
Qed.
Lemma prefix_of_nil l : [] `prefix_of` l.
Proof. by exists l. Qed.
Lemma prefix_of_nil_not x l : ¬x :: l `prefix_of` [].
Proof. by intros [k ?]. Qed.
Lemma prefix_of_cons x l1 l2 : l1 `prefix_of` l2 → x :: l1 `prefix_of` x :: l2.
Proof. intros [k ->]. by exists k. Qed.
Lemma prefix_of_cons_alt x y l1 l2 :
  x = y → l1 `prefix_of` l2 → x :: l1 `prefix_of` y :: l2.
Proof. intros ->. apply prefix_of_cons. Qed.
Lemma prefix_of_cons_inv_1 x y l1 l2 : x :: l1 `prefix_of` y :: l2 → x = y.
1399
Proof. by intros [k ?]; simplify_eq/=. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
1400 1401
Lemma prefix_of_cons_inv_2 x y l1 l2 :
  x :: l1 `prefix_of` y :: l2 → l1 `prefix_of` l2.
1402
Proof. intros [k ?]; simplify_eq/=. by exists k. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
1403
Lemma prefix_of_app k l1 l2 : l1 `prefix_of` l2 → k ++ l1 `prefix_of` k ++ l2.
1404
Proof. intros [k' ->]. exists k'. by rewrite (assoc_L (++)). Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
1405 1406 1407 1408
Lemma prefix_of_app_alt k1 k2 l1 l2 :
  k1 = k2 → l1 `prefix_of` l2 → k1 ++ l1 `prefix_of` k2 ++ l2.
Proof. intros ->. apply prefix_of_app. Qed.
Lemma prefix_of_app_l l1 l2 l3 : l1 ++ l3 `prefix_of` l2 → l1 `prefix_of` l2.
1409
Proof. intros [k ->]. exists (l3 ++ k). by rewrite (assoc_L (++)). Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
1410
Lemma prefix_of_app_r l1 l2 l3 : l1 `prefix_of` l2 → l1 `prefix_of` l2 ++ l3.
1411
Proof. intros [k ->]. exists (k ++ l3). by rewrite (assoc_L (++)). Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
1412 1413 1414
Lemma prefix_of_length l1 l2 : l1 `prefix_of` l2 → length l1 ≤ length l2.
Proof. intros [? ->]. rewrite app_length. lia. Qed.
Lemma prefix_of_snoc_not l x : ¬l ++ [x] `prefix_of` l.
1415
Proof. intros [??]. discriminate_list. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
1416 1417 1418
Global Instance: PreOrder (@suffix_of A).
Proof.
  split.
1419 1420
  - intros ?. by eexists [].
  - intros ???[k1->] [k2->]. exists (k2 ++ k1). by rewrite (assoc_L (++)).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
1421 1422 1423 1424 1425 1426 1427 1428 1429 1430 1431 1432 1433 1434 1435 1436 1437 1438 1439 1440 1441 1442 1443
Qed.
Global Instance prefix_of_dec `{∀ x y, Decision (x = y)} : ∀ l1 l2,
    Decision (l1 `prefix_of` l2) := fix go l1 l2 :=
  match l1, l2 return { l1 `prefix_of` l2 } + { ¬l1 `prefix_of` l2 } with
  | [], _ => left (prefix_of_nil _)
  | _, [] => right (prefix_of_nil_not _ _)
  | x :: l1, y :: l2 =>
    match decide_rel (=) x y with
    | left Hxy =>
      match go l1 l2 with
      | left Hl1l2 => left (prefix_of_cons_alt _ _ _ _ Hxy Hl1l2)
      | right Hl1l2 => right (Hl1l2 ∘ prefix_of_cons_inv_2 _ _ _ _)
      end
    | right Hxy => right (Hxy ∘ prefix_of_cons_inv_1 _ _ _ _)
    end
  end.

Section prefix_ops.
  Context `{∀ x y, Decision (x = y)}.
  Lemma max_prefix_of_fst l1 l2 :
    l1 = (max_prefix_of l1 l2).2 ++ (max_prefix_of l1 l2).1.1.
  Proof.
    revert l2. induction l1; intros [|??]; simpl;
1444
      repeat case_decide; f_equal/=; auto.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
1445 1446 1447 1448 1449
  Qed.
  Lemma max_prefix_of_fst_alt l1 l2 k1 k2 k3 :
    max_prefix_of l1 l2 = (k1, k2, k3) → l1 = k3 ++ k1.
  Proof.
    intros. pose proof (max_prefix_of_fst l1 l2).
1450
    by destruct (max_prefix_of l1 l2) as [[]?]; simplify_eq.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
1451 1452 1453 1454 1455 1456 1457 1458 1459 1460
  Qed.
  Lemma max_prefix_of_fst_prefix l1 l2 : (max_prefix_of l1 l2).2 `prefix_of` l1.
  Proof. eexists. apply max_prefix_of_fst. Qed.
  Lemma max_prefix_of_fst_prefix_alt l1 l2 k1 k2 k3 :
    max_prefix_of l1 l2 = (k1, k2, k3) → k3 `prefix_of` l1.
  Proof. eexists. eauto using max_prefix_of_fst_alt. Qed.
  Lemma max_prefix_of_snd l1 l2 :
    l2 = (max_prefix_of l1 l2).2 ++ (max_prefix_of l1 l2).1.2.
  Proof.
    revert l2. induction l1; intros [|??]; simpl;
1461
      repeat case_decide; f_equal/=; auto.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
1462 1463 1464 1465 1466
  Qed.
  Lemma max_prefix_of_snd_alt l1 l2 k1 k2 k3 :
    max_prefix_of l1 l2 = (k1, k2, k3) → l2 = k3 ++ k2.
  Proof.
    intro. pose proof (max_prefix_of_snd l1 l2).
1467
    by destruct (max_prefix_of l1 l2) as [[]?]; simplify_eq.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
1468 1469 1470 1471 1472 1473 1474 1475 1476 1477 1478 1479 1480 1481 1482 1483 1484
  Qed.
  Lemma max_prefix_of_snd_prefix l1 l2 : (max_prefix_of l1 l2).2 `prefix_of` l2.
  Proof. eexists. apply max_prefix_of_snd. Qed.
  Lemma max_prefix_of_snd_prefix_alt l1 l2 k1 k2 k3 :
    max_prefix_of l1 l2 = (k1,k2,k3) → k3 `prefix_of` l2.
  Proof. eexists. eauto using max_prefix_of_snd_alt. Qed.
  Lemma max_prefix_of_max l1 l2 k :
    k `prefix_of` l1 → k `prefix_of` l2 → k `prefix_of` (max_prefix_of l1 l2).2.
  Proof.
    intros [l1' ->] [l2' ->]. by induction k; simpl; repeat case_decide;
      simpl; auto using prefix_of_nil, prefix_of_cons.
  Qed.
  Lemma max_prefix_of_max_alt l1 l2 k1 k2 k3 k :
    max_prefix_of l1 l2 = (k1,k2,k3) →
    k `prefix_of` l1 → k `prefix_of` l2 → k `prefix_of` k3.
  Proof.
    intro. pose proof (max_prefix_of_max l1 l2 k).
1485
    by destruct (max_prefix_of l1 l2) as [[]?]; simplify_eq.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
1486 1487 1488 1489 1490 1491
  Qed.
  Lemma max_prefix_of_max_snoc l1 l2 k1 k2 k3 x1 x2 :
    max_prefix_of l1 l2 = (x1 :: k1, x2 :: k2, k3) → x1 ≠ x2.
  Proof.
    intros Hl ->. destruct (prefix_of_snoc_not k3 x2).
    eapply max_prefix_of_max_alt; eauto.
1492
    - rewrite (max_prefix_of_fst_alt _ _ _ _ _ Hl).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
1493
      apply prefix_of_app, prefix_of_cons, prefix_of_nil.
1494
    - rewrite (max_prefix_of_snd_alt _ _ _ _ _ Hl).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
1495 1496 1497 1498 1499 1500 1501 1502
      apply prefix_of_app, prefix_of_cons, prefix_of_nil.
  Qed.
End prefix_ops.

Lemma prefix_suffix_reverse l1 l2 :
  l1 `prefix_of` l2 ↔ reverse l1 `suffix_of` reverse l2.
Proof.
  split; intros [k E]; exists (reverse k).
1503 1504
  - by rewrite E, reverse_app.
  - by rewrite <-(reverse_involutive l2), E, reverse_app, reverse_involutive.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
1505 1506 1507 1508 1509 1510 1511
Qed.
Lemma suffix_prefix_reverse l1 l2 :
  l1 `suffix_of` l2 ↔ reverse l1 `prefix_of` reverse l2.
Proof. by rewrite prefix_suffix_reverse, !reverse_involutive. Qed.
Lemma suffix_of_nil l : [] `suffix_of` l.
Proof. exists l. by rewrite (right_id_L [] (++)). Qed.
Lemma suffix_of_nil_inv l : l `suffix_of` [] → l = [].
1512
Proof. by intros [[|?] ?]; simplify_list_eq. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
1513 1514 1515 1516
Lemma suffix_of_cons_nil_inv x l : ¬x :: l `suffix_of` [].
Proof. by intros [[] ?]. Qed.
Lemma suffix_of_snoc l1 l2 x :
  l1 `suffix_of` l2 → l1 ++ [x] `suffix_of` l2 ++ [x].
1517
Proof. intros [k ->]. exists k. by rewrite (assoc_L (++)). Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
1518 1519 1520 1521
Lemma suffix_of_snoc_alt x y l1 l2 :
  x = y → l1 `suffix_of` l2 → l1 ++ [x] `suffix_of` l2 ++ [y].
Proof. intros ->. apply suffix_of_snoc. Qed.
Lemma suffix_of_app l1 l2 k : l1 `suffix_of` l2 → l1 ++ k `suffix_of` l2 ++ k.
1522
Proof. intros [k' ->]. exists k'. by rewrite (assoc_L (++)). Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
1523 1524 1525 1526 1527
Lemma suffix_of_app_alt l1 l2 k1 k2 :
  k1 = k2 → l1 `suffix_of` l2 → l1 ++ k1 `suffix_of` l2 ++ k2.
Proof. intros ->. apply suffix_of_app. Qed.
Lemma suffix_of_snoc_inv_1 x y l1 l2 :
  l1 ++ [x] `suffix_of` l2 ++ [y] → x = y.
1528
Proof. intros [k' E]. rewrite (assoc_L (++)) in E. by simplify_list_eq. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
1529 1530 1531
Lemma suffix_of_snoc_inv_2 x y l1 l2 :
  l1 ++ [x] `suffix_of` l2 ++ [y] → l1 `suffix_of` l2.
Proof.
1532
  intros [k' E]. exists k'. rewrite (assoc_L (++)) in E. by simplify_list_eq.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
1533 1534 1535 1536
Qed.
Lemma suffix_of_app_inv l1 l2 k :
  l1 ++ k `suffix_of` l2 ++ k → l1 `suffix_of` l2.
Proof.
1537
  intros [k' E]. exists k'. rewrite (assoc_L (++)) in E. by simplify_list_eq.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
1538 1539
Qed.
Lemma suffix_of_cons_l l1 l2 x : x :: l1 `suffix_of` l2 → l1 `suffix_of` l2.
1540
Proof. intros [k ->]. exists (k ++ [x]). by rewrite <-(assoc_L (++)). Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
1541
Lemma suffix_of_app_l l1 l2 l3 : l3 ++ l1 `suffix_of` l2 → l1 `suffix_of` l2.
1542
Proof. intros [k ->]. exists (k ++ l3). by rewrite <-(assoc_L (++)). Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
1543 1544 1545
Lemma suffix_of_cons_r l1 l2 x : l1 `suffix_of` l2 → l1 `suffix_of` x :: l2.
Proof. intros [k ->]. by exists (x :: k). Qed.
Lemma suffix_of_app_r l1 l2 l3 : l1 `suffix_of` l2 → l1 `suffix_of` l3 ++ l2.
1546
Proof. intros [k ->]. exists (l3 ++ k). by rewrite (assoc_L (++)). Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
1547 1548 1549
Lemma suffix_of_cons_inv l1 l2 x y :
  x :: l1 `suffix_of` y :: l2 → x :: l1 = y :: l2 ∨ x :: l1 `suffix_of` l2.
Proof.
1550
  intros [[|? k] E]; [by left|]. right. simplify_eq/=. by apply suffix_of_app_r.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
1551 1552 1553 1554
Qed.
Lemma suffix_of_length l1 l2 : l1 `suffix_of` l2 → length l1 ≤ length l2.
Proof. intros [? ->]. rewrite app_length. lia. Qed.
Lemma suffix_of_cons_not x l : ¬x :: l `suffix_of` l.
1555
Proof. intros [??]. discriminate_list. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
1556 1557 1558 1559 1560 1561 1562 1563 1564 1565 1566 1567 1568 1569 1570 1571 1572 1573 1574 1575 1576 1577
Global Instance suffix_of_dec `{∀ x y, Decision (x = y)} l1 l2 :
  Decision (l1 `suffix_of` l2).
Proof.
  refine (cast_if (decide_rel prefix_of (reverse l1) (reverse l2)));
   abstract (by rewrite suffix_prefix_reverse).
Defined.

Section max_suffix_of.
  Context `{∀ x y, Decision (x = y)}.

  Lemma max_suffix_of_fst l1 l2 :
    l1 = (max_suffix_of l1 l2).1.1 ++ (max_suffix_of l1 l2).2.
  Proof.
    rewrite <-(reverse_involutive l1) at 1.
    rewrite (max_prefix_of_fst (reverse l1) (reverse l2)). unfold max_suffix_of.
    destruct (max_prefix_of (reverse l1) (reverse l2)) as ((?&?)&?); simpl.
    by rewrite reverse_app.
  Qed.
  Lemma max_suffix_of_fst_alt l1 l2 k1 k2 k3 :
    max_suffix_of l1 l2 = (k1, k2, k3) → l1 = k1 ++ k3.
  Proof.
    intro. pose proof (max_suffix_of_fst l1 l2).
1578
    by destruct (max_suffix_of l1 l2) as [[]?]; simplify_eq.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
1579 1580 1581 1582 1583 1584 1585 1586 1587 1588 1589 1590 1591 1592 1593 1594 1595 1596
  Qed.
  Lemma max_suffix_of_fst_suffix l1 l2 : (max_suffix_of l1 l2).2 `suffix_of` l1.
  Proof. eexists. apply max_suffix_of_fst. Qed.
  Lemma max_suffix_of_fst_suffix_alt l1 l2 k1 k2 k3 :
    max_suffix_of l1 l2 = (k1, k2, k3) → k3 `suffix_of` l1.
  Proof. eexists. eauto using max_suffix_of_fst_alt. Qed.
  Lemma max_suffix_of_snd l1 l2 :
    l2 = (max_suffix_of l1 l2).1.2 ++ (max_suffix_of l1 l2).2.
  Proof.
    rewrite <-(reverse_involutive l2) at 1.
    rewrite (max_prefix_of_snd (reverse l1) (reverse l2)). unfold max_suffix_of.
    destruct (max_prefix_of (reverse l1) (reverse l2)) as ((?&?)&?); simpl.
    by rewrite reverse_app.
  Qed.
  Lemma max_suffix_of_snd_alt l1 l2 k1 k2 k3 :
    max_suffix_of l1 l2 = (k1,k2,k3) → l2 = k2 ++ k3.
  Proof.
    intro. pose proof (max_suffix_of_snd l1 l2).
1597
    by destruct (max_suffix_of l1 l2) as [[]?]; simplify_eq.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
1598 1599 1600 1601 1602 1603 1604 1605 1606 1607 1608 1609 1610 1611 1612 1613 1614 1615 1616
  Qed.
  Lemma max_suffix_of_snd_suffix l1 l2 : (max_suffix_of l1 l2).2 `suffix_of` l2.
  Proof. eexists. apply max_suffix_of_snd. Qed.
  Lemma max_suffix_of_snd_suffix_alt l1 l2 k1 k2 k3 :
    max_suffix_of l1 l2 = (k1,k2,k3) → k3 `suffix_of` l2.
  Proof. eexists. eauto using max_suffix_of_snd_alt. Qed.
  Lemma max_suffix_of_max l1 l2 k :
    k `suffix_of` l1 → k `suffix_of` l2 → k `suffix_of` (max_suffix_of l1 l2).2.
  Proof.
    generalize (max_prefix_of_max (reverse l1) (reverse l2)).
    rewrite !suffix_prefix_reverse. unfold max_suffix_of.
    destruct (max_prefix_of (reverse l1) (reverse l2)) as ((?&?)&?); simpl.
    rewrite reverse_involutive. auto.
  Qed.
  Lemma max_suffix_of_max_alt l1 l2 k1 k2 k3 k :
    max_suffix_of l1 l2 = (k1, k2, k3) →
    k `suffix_of` l1 → k `suffix_of` l2 → k `suffix_of` k3.
  Proof.
    intro. pose proof (max_suffix_of_max l1 l2 k).
1617
    by destruct (max_suffix_of l1 l2) as [[]?]; simplify_eq.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
1618 1619 1620 1621 1622 1623
  Qed.
  Lemma max_suffix_of_max_snoc l1 l2 k1 k2 k3 x1 x2 :
    max_suffix_of l1 l2 = (k1 ++ [x1], k2 ++ [x2], k3) → x1 ≠ x2.
  Proof.
    intros Hl ->. destruct (suffix_of_cons_not x2 k3).
    eapply max_suffix_of_max_alt; eauto.
1624
    - rewrite (max_suffix_of_fst_alt _ _ _ _ _ Hl).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
1625
      by apply (suffix_of_app [x2]), suffix_of_app_r.