1. 05 Mar, 2019 1 commit
  2. 24 Jan, 2019 1 commit
  3. 26 Apr, 2018 1 commit
  4. 25 Apr, 2018 1 commit
  5. 30 Oct, 2017 1 commit
  6. 25 Oct, 2017 3 commits
  7. 17 Sep, 2017 1 commit
  8. 17 Aug, 2017 1 commit
  9. 08 Jun, 2017 1 commit
  10. 24 Mar, 2017 1 commit
    • Robbert Krebbers's avatar
      Generic big operators that are no longer tied to CMRAs. · 6fbff46e
      Robbert Krebbers authored
      Instead, I have introduced a type class `Monoid` that is used by the big operators:
      
          Class Monoid {M : ofeT} (o : M → M → M) := {
            monoid_unit : M;
            monoid_ne : NonExpansive2 o;
            monoid_assoc : Assoc (≡) o;
            monoid_comm : Comm (≡) o;
            monoid_left_id : LeftId (≡) monoid_unit o;
            monoid_right_id : RightId (≡) monoid_unit o;
          }.
      
      Note that the operation is an argument because we want to have multiple monoids over
      the same type (for example, on `uPred`s we have monoids for `∗`, `∧`, and `∨`). However,
      we do bundle the unit because:
      
      - If we would not, the unit would appear explicitly in an implicit argument of the
        big operators, which confuses rewrite. By bundling the unit in the `Monoid` class
        it is hidden, and hence rewrite won't even see it.
      - The unit is unique.
      
      We could in principle have big ops over setoids instead of OFEs. However, since we do
      not have a canonical structure for bundled setoids, I did not go that way.
      6fbff46e
  11. 21 Mar, 2017 2 commits
  12. 27 Jan, 2017 1 commit
  13. 09 Jan, 2017 1 commit
  14. 06 Jan, 2017 1 commit
  15. 05 Jan, 2017 1 commit
  16. 03 Jan, 2017 1 commit
  17. 09 Dec, 2016 1 commit
  18. 24 Nov, 2016 1 commit
  19. 22 Nov, 2016 2 commits
    • Robbert Krebbers's avatar
      Make nclose an explicit coercion. · 274209c2
      Robbert Krebbers authored
      We do this by introducing a type class UpClose with notation ↑.
      
      The reason for this change is as follows: since `nclose : namespace
      → coPset` is declared as a coercion, the notation `nclose N ⊆ E` was
      pretty printed as `N ⊆ E`. However, `N ⊆ E` could not be typechecked
      because type checking goes from left to right, and as such would look
      for an instance `SubsetEq namespace`, which causes the right hand side
      to be ill-typed.
      274209c2
    • Ralf Jung's avatar
      new notation for pure assertions · 99cbb525
      Ralf Jung authored
      99cbb525
  20. 17 Nov, 2016 1 commit
  21. 03 Nov, 2016 1 commit
    • Robbert Krebbers's avatar
      Use symbol ∗ for separating conjunction. · cc31476d
      Robbert Krebbers authored
      The old choice for ★ was a arbitrary: the precedence of the ASCII asterisk *
      was fixed at a wrong level in Coq, so we had to pick another symbol. The ★ was
      a random choice from a unicode chart.
      
      The new symbol ∗ (as proposed by David Swasey) corresponds better to
      conventional practise and matches the symbol we use on paper.
      cc31476d
  22. 28 Oct, 2016 2 commits
  23. 25 Oct, 2016 4 commits
  24. 12 Oct, 2016 2 commits
  25. 06 Oct, 2016 1 commit
  26. 05 Oct, 2016 1 commit
  27. 09 Sep, 2016 1 commit
    • Robbert Krebbers's avatar
      Support for specialization of P₁ -★ .. -★ Pₙ -★ Q where Q is persistent. · 090aaea3
      Robbert Krebbers authored
      Before this commit, given "HP" : P and "H" : P -★ Q with Q persistent, one
      could write:
      
        iSpecialize ("H" with "#HP")
      
      to eliminate the wand in "H" while keeping the resource "HP". The lemma:
      
        own_valid : own γ x ⊢ ✓ x
      
      was the prototypical example where this pattern (using the #) was used.
      
      However, the pattern was too limited. For example, given "H" : P₁ -★ P₂ -★ Q",
      one could not write iSpecialize ("H" with "#HP₁") because P₂ -★ Q is not
      persistent, even when Q is.
      
      So, instead, this commit introduces the following tactic:
      
        iSpecialize pm_trm as #
      
      which allows one to eliminate implications and wands while being able to use
      all hypotheses to prove the premises, as well as being able to use all
      hypotheses to prove the resulting goal.
      
      In the case of iDestruct, we now check whether all branches of the introduction
      pattern start with an `#` (moving the hypothesis to the persistent context) or
      `%` (moving the hypothesis to the pure Coq context). If this is the case, we
      allow one to use all hypotheses for proving the premises, as well as for proving
      the resulting goal.
      090aaea3
  28. 09 Aug, 2016 1 commit
  29. 08 Aug, 2016 1 commit
  30. 05 Aug, 2016 2 commits