- 25 Feb, 2019 3 commits
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Dan Frumin authored
-
Dan Frumin authored
-
- 24 Feb, 2019 1 commit
-
-
Dan Frumin authored
-
- 21 Feb, 2019 1 commit
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
- 20 Feb, 2019 1 commit
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
- 18 Feb, 2019 2 commits
- 16 Feb, 2019 3 commits
- 05 Feb, 2019 1 commit
-
-
Dan Frumin authored
-
- 03 Feb, 2019 1 commit
-
-
Dan Frumin authored
-
- 01 Feb, 2019 1 commit
-
-
Maxime Dénès authored
This was a noop and will soon be an error (until `Inductive` properly supports locality attributes). See https://github.com/coq/coq/pull/9410
-
- 26 Jan, 2019 1 commit
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
- 24 Jan, 2019 9 commits
- 19 Jan, 2019 3 commits
- 18 Jan, 2019 1 commit
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
- 15 Jan, 2019 1 commit
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
This became broken after the nested iSpecialize MR.
-
- 13 Jan, 2019 1 commit
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
- 11 Jan, 2019 4 commits
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
It now supports the specialization pattern `(H spat1 .. spatn)`, which first recursively specializes the hypothesis `H` using the specialization patterns `spat1 .. spatn`.
-
- 10 Jan, 2019 1 commit
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
- 25 Dec, 2018 4 commits
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
The continuation is called with a Boolean indicating whether the hypothesis was in the intuitionistic context or not.
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
Split it up into more logical parts.
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-
- 22 Dec, 2018 1 commit
-
-
Robbert Krebbers authored
-