tactics.v 77.8 KB
Newer Older
1 2
From iris.proofmode Require Import coq_tactics.
From iris.proofmode Require Import intro_patterns spec_patterns sel_patterns.
3
From iris.base_logic Require Export base_logic.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
4
From iris.proofmode Require Export classes notation.
5
From iris.proofmode Require Import class_instances.
Ralf Jung's avatar
Ralf Jung committed
6
From stdpp Require Import stringmap hlist.
7
From iris.proofmode Require Import strings.
8
Set Default Proof Using "Type".
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
9 10

Declare Reduction env_cbv := cbv [
11
  beq ascii_beq string_beq
12 13
  env_lookup env_lookup_delete env_delete env_app env_replace env_dom
  env_persistent env_spatial env_spatial_is_nil envs_dom
14
  envs_lookup envs_lookup_delete envs_delete envs_snoc envs_app
15 16
    envs_simple_replace envs_replace envs_split
    envs_clear_spatial envs_clear_persistent
17
    envs_split_go envs_split].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
18 19
Ltac env_cbv :=
  match goal with |- ?u => let v := eval env_cbv in u in change v end.
20
Ltac env_reflexivity := env_cbv; exact eq_refl.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
21

22
(** * Misc *)
23 24
(* Tactic Notation tactics cannot return terms *)
Ltac iFresh' H :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
25 26
  lazymatch goal with
  |- of_envs ?Δ  _ =>
27 28 29
     (* [vm_compute fails] if any of the hypotheses in [Δ] contain evars, so
     first use [cbv] to compute the domain of [Δ] *)
     let Hs := eval cbv in (envs_dom Δ) in
30 31
     eval vm_compute in (fresh_string_of_set H (of_list Hs))
  | _ => H
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
32
  end.
33
Ltac iFresh := iFresh' "~".
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
34

35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43
Ltac iMissingHyps Hs :=
  let Δ :=
    lazymatch goal with
    | |- of_envs ?Δ  _ => Δ
    | |- context[ envs_split _ _ ?Δ ] => Δ
    end in
  let Hhyps := eval env_cbv in (envs_dom Δ) in
  eval vm_compute in (list_difference Hs Hhyps).

44
Ltac iTypeOf H :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
45
  let Δ := match goal with |- of_envs ?Δ  _ => Δ end in
46
  eval env_cbv in (envs_lookup H Δ).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
47

48
Tactic Notation "iMatchHyp" tactic1(tac) :=
49 50 51 52
  match goal with
  | |- context[ environments.Esnoc _ ?x ?P ] => tac x P
  end.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64
Class AsValid {M} (φ : Prop) (P : uPred M) := as_entails : φ  P.
Arguments AsValid {_} _%type _%I.

Instance as_valid_valid {M} (P : uPred M) : AsValid (uPred_valid P) P | 0.
Proof. by rewrite /AsValid. Qed.

Instance as_valid_entails {M} (P Q : uPred M) : AsValid (P  Q) (P - Q) | 1.
Proof. split. apply uPred.entails_wand. apply uPred.wand_entails. Qed.

Instance as_valid_equiv {M} (P Q : uPred M) : AsValid (P  Q) (P  Q).
Proof. split. apply uPred.equiv_iff. apply uPred.iff_equiv. Qed.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
65
(** * Start a proof *)
66
Ltac iStartProof :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
67
  lazymatch goal with
68
  | |- of_envs _  _ => idtac
69
  | |- ?P =>
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
70 71
    apply (proj2 (_ : AsValid P _)), tac_adequate
    || fail "iStartProof: not a uPred"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
72 73 74 75 76
  end.

(** * Context manipulation *)
Tactic Notation "iRename" constr(H1) "into" constr(H2) :=
  eapply tac_rename with _ H1 H2 _ _; (* (i:=H1) (j:=H2) *)
77 78
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iRename:" H1 "not found"
    |env_reflexivity || fail "iRename:" H2 "not fresh"|].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
79

80 81 82 83
Local Inductive esel_pat :=
  | ESelPure
  | ESelName : bool  string  esel_pat.

84
Ltac iElaborateSelPat pat :=
85 86
  let rec go pat Δ Hs :=
    lazymatch pat with
87
    | [] => eval cbv in Hs
88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107
    | SelPure :: ?pat => go pat Δ (ESelPure :: Hs)
    | SelPersistent :: ?pat =>
       let Hs' := eval env_cbv in (env_dom (env_persistent Δ)) in
       let Δ' := eval env_cbv in (envs_clear_persistent Δ) in
       go pat Δ' ((ESelName true <$> Hs') ++ Hs)
    | SelSpatial :: ?pat =>
       let Hs' := eval env_cbv in (env_dom (env_spatial Δ)) in
       let Δ' := eval env_cbv in (envs_clear_spatial Δ) in
       go pat Δ' ((ESelName false <$> Hs') ++ Hs)
    | SelName ?H :: ?pat =>
       lazymatch eval env_cbv in (envs_lookup_delete H Δ) with
       | Some (?p,_,?Δ') => go pat Δ' (ESelName p H :: Hs)
       | None => fail "iElaborateSelPat:" H "not found"
       end
    end in
  lazymatch goal with
  | |- of_envs ?Δ  _ =>
    let pat := sel_pat.parse pat in go pat Δ (@nil esel_pat)
  end.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
108 109
Tactic Notation "iClear" constr(Hs) :=
  let rec go Hs :=
110
    lazymatch Hs with
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
111
    | [] => idtac
112 113
    | ESelPure :: ?Hs => clear; go Hs
    | ESelName _ ?H :: ?Hs =>
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
114
       eapply tac_clear with _ H _ _; (* (i:=H) *)
115
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iClear:" H "not found"|go Hs]
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
116
    end in
117
  let Hs := iElaborateSelPat Hs in go Hs.
118

119 120
Tactic Notation "iClear" "(" ident_list(xs) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iClear Hs; clear xs.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
121 122 123

(** * Assumptions *)
Tactic Notation "iExact" constr(H) :=
124
  eapply tac_assumption with H _ _; (* (i:=H) *)
125
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iExact:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
126 127 128
    |apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- FromAssumption _ ?P _ => P end in
     fail "iExact:" H ":" P "does not match goal"].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136

Tactic Notation "iAssumptionCore" :=
  let rec find Γ i P :=
    match Γ with
    | Esnoc ?Γ ?j ?Q => first [unify P Q; unify i j| find Γ i P]
    end in
  match goal with
  | |- envs_lookup ?i (Envs ?Γp ?Γs) = Some (_, ?P) =>
137
     first [is_evar i; fail 1 | env_reflexivity]
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
138
  | |- envs_lookup ?i (Envs ?Γp ?Γs) = Some (_, ?P) =>
139
     is_evar i; first [find Γp i P | find Γs i P]; env_reflexivity
140
  | |- envs_lookup_delete ?i (Envs ?Γp ?Γs) = Some (_, ?P, _) =>
141
     first [is_evar i; fail 1 | env_reflexivity]
142
  | |- envs_lookup_delete ?i (Envs ?Γp ?Γs) = Some (_, ?P, _) =>
143
     is_evar i; first [find Γp i P | find Γs i P]; env_reflexivity
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
144
  end.
145

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
146
Tactic Notation "iAssumption" :=
147 148 149 150
  let Hass := fresh in
  let rec find p Γ Q :=
    match Γ with
    | Esnoc ?Γ ?j ?P => first
151
       [pose proof (_ : FromAssumption p P Q) as Hass;
152
        apply (tac_assumption _ j p P); [env_reflexivity|apply Hass]
153 154 155 156 157 158 159
       |find p Γ Q]
    end in
  match goal with
  | |- of_envs (Envs ?Γp ?Γs)  ?Q =>
     first [find true Γp Q | find false Γs Q
           |fail "iAssumption:" Q "not found"]
  end.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
160 161 162 163 164

(** * False *)
Tactic Notation "iExFalso" := apply tac_ex_falso.

(** * Making hypotheses persistent or pure *)
165
Local Tactic Notation "iPersistent" constr(H) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
166
  eapply tac_persistent with _ H _ _ _; (* (i:=H) *)
167
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iPersistent:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
168
    |apply _ ||
169
     let Q := match goal with |- IntoPersistentP _ ?Q _ => Q end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
170
     fail "iPersistent:" Q "not persistent"
171
    |env_reflexivity|].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
172

173
Local Tactic Notation "iPure" constr(H) "as" simple_intropattern(pat) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
174
  eapply tac_pure with _ H _ _ _; (* (i:=H1) *)
175
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iPure:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
176 177 178
    |apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- IntoPure ?P _ => P end in
     fail "iPure:" P "not pure"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
179 180
    |intros pat].

181
Tactic Notation "iPureIntro" :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
182
  iStartProof;
183
  eapply tac_pure_intro;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
184 185 186 187
    [apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- FromPure ?P _ => P end in
     fail "iPureIntro:" P "not pure"
    |].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
188

189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203
(** Framing *)
Local Ltac iFrameFinish :=
  lazy iota beta;
  try match goal with
  | |- _  True => exact (uPred.pure_intro _ _ I)
  end.

Local Ltac iFramePure t :=
  let φ := type of t in
  eapply (tac_frame_pure _ _ _ _ t);
    [apply _ || fail "iFrame: cannot frame" φ
    |iFrameFinish].

Local Ltac iFrameHyp H :=
  eapply tac_frame with _ H _ _ _;
204
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iFrame:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
205 206 207
    |apply _ ||
     let R := match goal with |- Frame _ ?R _ _ => R end in
     fail "iFrame: cannot frame" R
208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253
    |iFrameFinish].

Local Ltac iFrameAnyPure :=
  repeat match goal with H : _ |- _ => iFramePure H end.

Local Ltac iFrameAnyPersistent :=
  let rec go Hs :=
    match Hs with [] => idtac | ?H :: ?Hs => repeat iFrameHyp H; go Hs end in
  match goal with
  | |- of_envs ?Δ  _ =>
     let Hs := eval cbv in (env_dom (env_persistent Δ)) in go Hs
  end.

Local Ltac iFrameAnySpatial :=
  let rec go Hs :=
    match Hs with [] => idtac | ?H :: ?Hs => try iFrameHyp H; go Hs end in
  match goal with
  | |- of_envs ?Δ  _ =>
     let Hs := eval cbv in (env_dom (env_spatial Δ)) in go Hs
  end.

Tactic Notation "iFrame" := iFrameAnySpatial.

Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 ).
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 ).
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 ).
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 ).
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) constr(t6) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 ).
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) constr(t6) constr(t7) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 t7 ).
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) constr(t6) constr(t7) constr(t8)")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 t7 t8 ).

Tactic Notation "iFrame" constr(Hs) :=
  let rec go Hs :=
254
    lazymatch Hs with
255
    | [] => idtac
256 257 258 259
    | SelPure :: ?Hs => iFrameAnyPure; go Hs
    | SelPersistent :: ?Hs => iFrameAnyPersistent; go Hs
    | SelSpatial :: ?Hs => iFrameAnySpatial; go Hs
    | SelName ?H :: ?Hs => iFrameHyp H; go Hs
260
    end
261
  in let Hs := sel_pat.parse Hs in go Hs.
262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 ) Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 ) Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4) ")"
    constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 ) Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 ) Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) constr(t6) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 ) Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) constr(t6) constr(t7) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 t7 ) Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) constr(t6) constr(t7) constr(t8)")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 t7 t8 ) Hs.

284 285 286 287 288 289
(** * Basic introduction tactics *)
Local Tactic Notation "iIntro" "(" simple_intropattern(x) ")" :=
  try iStartProof;
  try first
    [(* (∀ _, _) *) apply tac_forall_intro
    |(* (?P → _) *) eapply tac_impl_intro_pure;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
290 291 292 293
      [apply _ ||
       let P := match goal with |- IntoPure ?P _ => P end in
       fail "iIntro:" P "not pure"
      |]
294
    |(* (?P -∗ _) *) eapply tac_wand_intro_pure;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
295 296 297 298
      [apply _ ||
       let P := match goal with |- IntoPure ?P _ => P end in
       fail "iIntro:" P "not pure"
      |]
299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307
    |(* ⌜∀ _, _⌝ *) apply tac_pure_forall_intro
    |(* ⌜_ → _⌝ *) apply tac_pure_impl_intro];
  intros x.

Local Tactic Notation "iIntro" constr(H) :=
  iStartProof;
  first
  [ (* (?Q → _) *)
    eapply tac_impl_intro with _ H; (* (i:=H) *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
308 309 310 311
      [env_cbv; apply _ ||
       let P := lazymatch goal with |- PersistentP ?P => P end in
       fail 1 "iIntro: introducing non-persistent" H ":" P
              "into non-empty spatial context"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
312 313
      |env_reflexivity || fail "iIntro:" H "not fresh"
      |]
314 315
  | (* (_ -∗ _) *)
    eapply tac_wand_intro with _ H; (* (i:=H) *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
316 317
      [env_reflexivity || fail 1 "iIntro:" H "not fresh"
      |]
318 319 320 321 322 323 324
  | fail 1 "iIntro: nothing to introduce" ].

Local Tactic Notation "iIntro" "#" constr(H) :=
  iStartProof;
  first
  [ (* (?P → _) *)
    eapply tac_impl_intro_persistent with _ H _; (* (i:=H) *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
325
      [apply _ || 
326
       let P := match goal with |- IntoPersistentP _ ?P _ => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
327 328 329
       fail 1 "iIntro: " P " not persistent"
      |env_reflexivity || fail 1 "iIntro:" H "not fresh"
      |]
330 331
  | (* (?P -∗ _) *)
    eapply tac_wand_intro_persistent with _ H _; (* (i:=H) *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
332
      [apply _ || 
333
       let P := match goal with |- IntoPersistentP _ ?P _ => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
334 335 336
       fail 1 "iIntro: " P " not persistent"
      |env_reflexivity || fail 1 "iIntro:" H "not fresh"
      |]
337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361
  | fail 1 "iIntro: nothing to introduce" ].

Local Tactic Notation "iIntro" "_" :=
  try iStartProof;
  first
  [ (* (?Q → _) *) apply tac_impl_intro_drop
  | (* (_ -∗ _) *) apply tac_wand_intro_drop
  | (* (∀ _, _) *) iIntro (_)
  | fail 1 "iIntro: nothing to introduce" ].

Local Tactic Notation "iIntroForall" :=
  try iStartProof;
  lazymatch goal with
  | |-  _, ?P => fail
  | |-  _, _ => intro
  | |- _  ( x : _, _) => let x' := fresh x in iIntro (x')
  end.
Local Tactic Notation "iIntro" :=
  try iStartProof;
  lazymatch goal with
  | |- _  ?P => intro
  | |- _  (_ - _) => iIntro (?) || let H := iFresh in iIntro #H || iIntro H
  | |- _  (_  _) => iIntro (?) || let H := iFresh in iIntro #H || iIntro H
  end.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
362
(** * Specialize *)
363 364 365 366 367
Record iTrm {X As} :=
  ITrm { itrm : X ; itrm_vars : hlist As ; itrm_hyps : string }.
Arguments ITrm {_ _} _ _ _.

Notation "( H $! x1 .. xn )" :=
368
  (ITrm H (hcons x1 .. (hcons xn hnil) ..) "") (at level 0, x1, xn at level 9).
369
Notation "( H $! x1 .. xn 'with' pat )" :=
370
  (ITrm H (hcons x1 .. (hcons xn hnil) ..) pat) (at level 0, x1, xn at level 9).
371 372
Notation "( H 'with' pat )" := (ITrm H hnil pat) (at level 0).

373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383
(*
There is some hacky stuff going on here (most probably there is a Coq bug).
Holes -- like unresolved type class instances -- in the argument `xs` are
resolved at arbitrary moments. It seems that tactics like `apply`, `split` and
`eexists` trigger type class search to resolve these holes. To avoid TC being
triggered too eagerly, this tactic uses `refine` at various places instead of
`apply`.

TODO: Investigate what really is going on. Is there a related to Cog bug #5752?
When should holes in an `open_constr` be resolved?
*)
384
Local Tactic Notation "iSpecializeArgs" constr(H) open_constr(xs) :=
385
  let rec go xs :=
386
    lazymatch xs with
387
    | hnil => apply id (* Finally, trigger TC *)
388
    | hcons ?x ?xs =>
389
       eapply tac_forall_specialize with _ H _ _ _; (* (i:=H) (a:=x) *)
390 391
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H "not found"
         |typeclasses eauto ||
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
392
          let P := match goal with |- IntoForall ?P _ => P end in
393 394 395 396
          fail "iSpecialize: cannot instantiate" P "with" x
         |lazymatch goal with (* Force [A] in [ex_intro] to deal with coercions. *)
          | |-  _ : ?A, _ => refine (@ex_intro A _ x (conj _ _))
          end; [env_reflexivity|go xs]]
397 398
    end in
  go xs.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
399

400
Local Tactic Notation "iSpecializePat" open_constr(H) constr(pat) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
401
  let solve_to_wand H1 :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
402
    apply _ ||
403
    let P := match goal with |- IntoWand _ ?P _ _ => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
404
    fail "iSpecialize:" P "not an implication/wand" in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
405 406 407
  let rec go H1 pats :=
    lazymatch pats with
    | [] => idtac
408 409 410
    | SForall :: ?pats =>
       idtac "the * specialization pattern is deprecated because it is applied implicitly";
       go H1 pats
411
    | SName ?H2 :: ?pats =>
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
412
       eapply tac_specialize with _ _ H2 _ H1 _ _ _ _; (* (j:=H1) (i:=H2) *)
413 414
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H2 "not found"
         |env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H1 "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
415
         |apply _ ||
416 417
          let P := match goal with |- IntoWand _ ?P ?Q _ => P end in
          let Q := match goal with |- IntoWand _ ?P ?Q _ => Q end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
418
          fail "iSpecialize: cannot instantiate" P "with" Q
419
         |env_reflexivity|go H1 pats]
420 421
    | SPureGoal ?d :: ?pats =>
       eapply tac_specialize_assert_pure with _ H1 _ _ _ _ _;
422
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H1 "not found"
423
         |solve_to_wand H1
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
424 425 426
         |apply _ ||
          let Q := match goal with |- FromPure ?Q _ => Q end in
          fail "iSpecialize:" Q "not pure"
427
         |env_reflexivity
428
         |done_if d (*goal*)
429
         |go H1 pats]
430 431
    | SGoal (SpecGoal GPersistent false ?Hs_frame [] ?d) :: ?pats =>
       eapply tac_specialize_assert_persistent with _ _ H1 _ _ _ _;
432
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H1 "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
433
         |solve_to_wand H1
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
434 435 436
         |apply _ ||
          let Q := match goal with |- PersistentP ?Q => Q end in
          fail "iSpecialize:" Q "not persistent"
437
         |env_reflexivity
438
         |iFrame Hs_frame; done_if d (*goal*)
439
         |go H1 pats]
440 441 442
    | SGoal (SpecGoal GPersistent _ _ _ _) :: ?pats =>
       fail "iSpecialize: cannot select hypotheses for persistent premise"
    | SGoal (SpecGoal ?m ?lr ?Hs_frame ?Hs ?d) :: ?pats =>
443
       let Hs' := eval cbv in (if lr then Hs else Hs_frame ++ Hs) in
444
       eapply tac_specialize_assert with _ _ _ H1 _ lr Hs' _ _ _ _;
445
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H1 "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
446
         |solve_to_wand H1
447 448 449
         |lazymatch m with
          | GSpatial => apply elim_modal_dummy
          | GModal => apply _ || fail "iSpecialize: goal not a modality"
450
          end
451 452
         |env_reflexivity ||
          let Hs' := iMissingHyps Hs' in
453
          fail "iSpecialize: hypotheses" Hs' "not found"
454
         |iFrame Hs_frame; done_if d (*goal*)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
455
         |go H1 pats]
456 457
    | SAutoFrame GPersistent :: ?pats =>
       eapply tac_specialize_assert_persistent with _ _ H1 _ _ _ _;
458
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H1 "not found"
459
         |solve_to_wand H1
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
460 461 462
         |apply _ ||
          let Q := match goal with |- PersistentP ?Q => Q end in
          fail "iSpecialize:" Q "not persistent"
463
         |env_reflexivity
464 465 466 467
         |solve [iFrame "∗ #"]
         |go H1 pats]
    | SAutoFrame ?m :: ?pats =>
       eapply tac_specialize_frame with _ H1 _ _ _ _ _ _;
468
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H1 "not found"
469 470 471 472 473
         |solve_to_wand H1
         |lazymatch m with
          | GSpatial => apply elim_modal_dummy
          | GModal => apply _ || fail "iSpecialize: goal not a modality"
          end
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
474 475
         |iFrame "∗ #"; apply tac_unlock ||
          fail "iSpecialize: premise cannot be solved by framing"
476
         |reflexivity]; iIntro H1; go H1 pats
477 478
    end in let pats := spec_pat.parse pat in go H pats.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
479
(* The argument [p] denotes whether the conclusion of the specialized term is
480 481 482
persistent. If so, one can use all spatial hypotheses for both proving the
premises and the remaning goal. The argument [p] can either be a Boolean or an
introduction pattern, which will be coerced into [true] when it solely contains
483 484 485 486 487
`#` or `%` patterns at the top-level.

In case the specialization pattern in [t] states that the modality of the goal
should be kept for one of the premises (i.e. [>[H1 .. Hn]] is used) then [p]
defaults to [false] (i.e. spatial hypotheses are not preserved). *)
488
Tactic Notation "iSpecializeCore" open_constr(t) "as" constr(p) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
489
  let p := intro_pat_persistent p in
490 491
  let t :=
    match type of t with string => constr:(ITrm t hnil "") | _ => t end in
492 493
  lazymatch t with
  | ITrm ?H ?xs ?pat =>
494
    let pat := spec_pat.parse pat in
495 496
    lazymatch type of H with
    | string =>
497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504
      (* The lemma [tac_specialize_persistent_helper] allows one to use all
      spatial hypotheses for both proving the premises of the lemma we
      specialize as well as those of the remaining goal. We can only use it when
      the result of the specialization is persistent, and no modality is
      eliminated. As an optimization, we do not use this when only universal
      quantifiers are instantiated. *)
      lazymatch eval compute in
        (bool_decide (pat  []) && p && negb (existsb spec_pat_modal pat)) with
505 506
      | true =>
         eapply tac_specialize_persistent_helper with _ H _ _ _;
507
           [env_reflexivity || fail "iSpecialize:" H "not found"
508
           |iSpecializeArgs H xs; iSpecializePat H pat; last (iExact H)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
509 510 511
           |apply _ ||
            let Q := match goal with |- PersistentP ?Q => Q end in
            fail "iSpecialize:" Q "not persistent"
512
           |env_reflexivity|(* goal *)]
513
      | false => iSpecializeArgs H xs; iSpecializePat H pat
514 515
      end
    | _ => fail "iSpecialize:" H "should be a hypothesis, use iPoseProof instead"
516
    end
517
  | _ => fail "iSpecialize:" t "should be a proof mode term"
518
  end.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
519

520
Tactic Notation "iSpecialize" open_constr(t) :=
521 522 523
  iSpecializeCore t as false.
Tactic Notation "iSpecialize" open_constr(t) "as" "#" :=
  iSpecializeCore t as true.
524

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
525
(** * Pose proof *)
526 527
(* The tactic [iIntoValid] tactic solves a goal [uPred_valid Q]. The
arguments [t] is a Coq term whose type is of the following shape:
528

529
- [∀ (x_1 : A_1) .. (x_n : A_n), uPred_valid Q]
530
- [∀ (x_1 : A_1) .. (x_n : A_n), P1 ⊢ P2], in which case [Q] becomes [P1 -∗ P2]
531 532 533 534
- [∀ (x_1 : A_1) .. (x_n : A_n), P1 ⊣⊢ P2], in which case [Q] becomes [P1 ↔ P2]

The tactic instantiates each dependent argument [x_i] with an evar and generates
a goal [P] for non-dependent arguments [x_i : P]. *)
535
Tactic Notation "iIntoValid" open_constr(t) :=
536
  let rec go t :=
537
    let tT := type of t in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547
    first
      [apply (proj1 (_ : AsValid tT _) t)
      |lazymatch eval hnf in tT with
       | ?P  ?Q => let H := fresh in assert P as H; [|go uconstr:(t H); clear H]
       |  _ : ?T, _ =>
         (* Put [T] inside an [id] to avoid TC inference from being invoked. *)
         (* This is a workarround for Coq bug #4969. *)
         let e := fresh in evar (e:id T);
         let e' := eval unfold e in e in clear e; go (t e')
       end] in
548
  go t.
549

550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564
(* The tactic [tac] is called with a temporary fresh name [H]. The argument
[lazy_tc] denotes whether type class inference on the premises of [lem] should
be performed before (if false) or after (if true) [tac H] is called. *)
Tactic Notation "iPoseProofCore" open_constr(lem)
    "as" constr(p) constr(lazy_tc) tactic(tac) :=
  try iStartProof;
  let Htmp := iFresh in
  let t :=
    lazymatch lem with ITrm ?t ?xs ?pat => t | _ => lem end in
  let spec_tac _ :=
    lazymatch lem with
    | ITrm ?t ?xs ?pat => iSpecializeCore (ITrm Htmp xs pat) as p
    | _ => idtac
    end in
  let go goal_tac :=
565 566 567
    lazymatch type of t with
    | string =>
       eapply tac_pose_proof_hyp with _ _ t _ Htmp _;
568 569
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iPoseProof:" t "not found"
         |env_reflexivity || fail "iPoseProof:" Htmp "not fresh"
570
         |goal_tac ()]
571 572
    | _ =>
       eapply tac_pose_proof with _ Htmp _; (* (j:=H) *)
573
         [iIntoValid t
574
         |env_reflexivity || fail "iPoseProof:" Htmp "not fresh"
575
         |goal_tac ()]
576
    end;
577 578 579 580
    try (apply _) in
  lazymatch eval compute in lazy_tc with
  | true => go ltac:(fun _ => spec_tac (); last (tac Htmp))
  | false => go spec_tac; last (tac Htmp)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
581 582 583
  end.

(** * Apply *)
584
Tactic Notation "iApplyHyp" constr(H) :=
585 586
  let rec go H := first
    [eapply tac_apply with _ H _ _ _;
587
      [env_reflexivity
588 589
      |apply _
      |lazy beta (* reduce betas created by instantiation *)]
590
    |iSpecializePat H "[]"; last go H] in
591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598
  iExact H ||
  go H ||
  lazymatch iTypeOf H with
  | Some (_,?Q) => fail "iApply: cannot apply" Q
  end.

Tactic Notation "iApply" open_constr(lem) :=
  iPoseProofCore lem as false true (fun H => iApplyHyp H).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
599 600

(** * Revert *)
601
Local Tactic Notation "iForallRevert" ident(x) :=
602 603 604 605 606 607
  let err x :=
    intros x;
    iMatchHyp (fun H P =>
      lazymatch P with
      | context [x] => fail 2 "iRevert:" x "is used in hypothesis" H
      end) in
608 609
  let A := type of x in
  lazymatch type of A with
610 611 612
  | Prop => revert x; first [apply tac_pure_revert|err x]
  | _ => revert x; first [apply tac_forall_revert|err x]
  end.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
613 614

Tactic Notation "iRevert" constr(Hs) :=
615 616
  let rec go Hs :=
    lazymatch Hs with
617
    | [] => idtac
618 619 620 621 622
    | ESelPure :: ?Hs =>
       repeat match goal with x : _ |- _ => revert x end;
       go Hs
    | ESelName _ ?H :: ?Hs =>
       eapply tac_revert with _ H _ _; (* (i:=H2) *)
623
         [env_reflexivity || fail "iRevert:" H "not found"
624
         |env_cbv; go Hs]
625
    end in
626
  let Hs := iElaborateSelPat Hs in go Hs.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
627

628
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ")" :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
629
  iForallRevert x1.
630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x2; iRevert ( x1 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x3; iRevert ( x1 x2 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x4; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x5; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ident(x6) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x6; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ident(x6) ident(x7) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x7; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ident(x6) ident(x7) ident(x8) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x8; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 ).

Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4) ")"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
656
    constr(Hs) :=
657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ident(x6) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ident(x6) ident(x7) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ident(x6) ident(x7) ident(x8) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 x8 ).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
670 671 672

(** * Disjunction *)
Tactic Notation "iLeft" :=
673
  iStartProof;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
674
  eapply tac_or_l;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
675 676 677 678
    [apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- FromOr ?P _ _ => P end in
     fail "iLeft:" P "not a disjunction"
    |].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
679
Tactic Notation "iRight" :=
680
  iStartProof;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
681
  eapply tac_or_r;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
682 683 684 685
    [apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- FromOr ?P _ _ => P end in
     fail "iRight:" P "not a disjunction"
    |].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
686

687
Local Tactic Notation "iOrDestruct" constr(H) "as" constr(H1) constr(H2) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
688
  eapply tac_or_destruct with _ _ H _ H1 H2 _ _ _; (* (i:=H) (j1:=H1) (j2:=H2) *)
689
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iOrDestruct:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
690 691 692
    |apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- IntoOr ?P _ _ => P end in
     fail "iOrDestruct: cannot destruct" P
693
    |env_reflexivity || fail "iOrDestruct:" H1 "not fresh"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
694 695
    |env_reflexivity || fail "iOrDestruct:" H2 "not fresh"
    | |].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
696 697 698

(** * Conjunction and separating conjunction *)
Tactic Notation "iSplit" :=
699
  iStartProof;
700 701 702
  lazymatch goal with
  | |- _  _ =>
    eapply tac_and_split;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
703
      [apply _ ||
704
       let P := match goal with |- FromAnd _ ?P _ _ => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
705
       fail "iSplit:" P "not a conjunction"| |]
706
  end.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
707 708

Tactic Notation "iSplitL" constr(Hs) :=
709
  iStartProof;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
710 711
  let Hs := words Hs in
  eapply tac_sep_split with _ _ false Hs _ _; (* (js:=Hs) *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
712
    [apply _ ||
713
     let P := match goal with |- FromAnd _ ?P _ _ => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
714
     fail "iSplitL:" P "not a separating conjunction"
715 716
    |env_reflexivity ||
     let Hs := iMissingHyps Hs in
717
     fail "iSplitL: hypotheses" Hs "not found"
718 719
    | |].

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
720
Tactic Notation "iSplitR" constr(Hs) :=
721
  iStartProof;
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
722 723
  let Hs := words Hs in
  eapply tac_sep_split with _ _ true Hs _ _; (* (js:=Hs) *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
724
    [apply _ ||
725
     let P := match goal with |- FromAnd _ ?P _ _ => P end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
726
     fail "iSplitR:" P "not a separating conjunction"
727 728
    |env_reflexivity ||
     let Hs := iMissingHyps Hs in
729
     fail "iSplitR: hypotheses" Hs "not found"
730
    | |].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
731 732 733 734

Tactic Notation "iSplitL" := iSplitR "".
Tactic Notation "iSplitR" := iSplitL "".

735 736
Local Tactic Notation "iAndDestruct" constr(H) "as" constr(H1) constr(H2) :=
  eapply tac_and_destruct with _ H _ H1 H2 _ _ _; (* (i:=H) (j1:=H1) (j2:=H2) *)
737
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iAndDestruct:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
738 739 740
    |apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- IntoAnd _ ?P _ _ => P end in
     fail "iAndDestruct: cannot destruct" P
741
    |env_reflexivity || fail "iAndDestruct:" H1 "or" H2 " not fresh"|].
742 743 744

Local Tactic Notation "iAndDestructChoice" constr(H) "as" constr(lr) constr(H') :=
  eapply tac_and_destruct_choice with _ H _ lr H' _ _ _;
745
    [env_reflexivity || fail "iAndDestructChoice:" H "not found"
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
746 747 748
    |apply _ ||
     let P := match goal with |- IntoAnd _ ?P _ _ => P end in
     fail "iAndDestructChoice: cannot destruct" P
749
    |env_reflexivity || fail "iAndDestructChoice:" H' " not fresh"|].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
750

751 752 753 754
(** * Combinining hypotheses *)
Tactic Notation "iCombine" constr(Hs) "as" constr(H) :=
  let Hs := words Hs in
  eapply tac_combine with _ _ Hs _ _ H _;
755 756
    [env_reflexivity ||
     let Hs := iMissingHyps Hs in
757
     fail "iCombine: hypotheses" Hs "not found"
758
    |apply _
759
    |env_reflexivity || fail "iCombine:" H "not fresh"|].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
760