ltac_tactics.v 106 KB
Newer Older
1
From iris.proofmode Require Import coq_tactics reduction.
2
From iris.proofmode Require Import base intro_patterns spec_patterns sel_patterns.
3
From iris.bi Require Export bi telescopes.
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
From stdpp Require Import namespaces.
From iris.proofmode Require Export classes notation.
From stdpp Require Import hlist pretty.
Set Default Proof Using "Type".
Export ident.

(** For most of the tactics, we want to have tight control over the order and
way in which type class inference is performed. To that end, many tactics make
use of [notypeclasses refine] and the [iSolveTC] tactic to manually invoke type
class inference.

The tactic [iSolveTC] does not use [apply _], as that often leads to issues
because it will try to solve all evars whose type is a typeclass, in
dependency order (according to Matthieu). If one fails, it aborts. However, we
generally rely on progress on the main goal to be solved to make progress
elsewhere. With [typeclasses eauto], that seems to work better.

A drawback of [typeclasses eauto] is that it is multi-success, i.e. whenever
subsequent tactics fail, it will backtrack to [typeclasses eauto] to try the
next type class instance. This is almost always undesired and leads to poor
performance and horrible error messages, so we wrap it in a [once]. *)
Ltac iSolveTC :=
  solve [once (typeclasses eauto)].

28
29
30
(** Tactic used for solving side-conditions arising from TC resolution in iMod
and iInv. *)
Ltac iSolveSideCondition :=
31
  split_and?; try solve [ fast_done | solve_ndisj ].
32

33
34
35
36
37
38
39
(** Used for printing [string]s and [ident]s. *)
Ltac pretty_ident H :=
  lazymatch H with
  | INamed ?H => H
  | ?H => H
  end.

40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
(** * Misc *)

Ltac iMissingHyps Hs :=
  let Δ :=
    lazymatch goal with
    | |- envs_entails ?Δ _ => Δ
    | |- context[ envs_split _ _ ?Δ ] => Δ
    end in
48
  let Hhyps := pm_eval (envs_dom Δ) in
49
50
51
52
  eval vm_compute in (list_difference Hs Hhyps).

Ltac iTypeOf H :=
  let Δ := match goal with |- envs_entails ?Δ _ => Δ end in
53
  pm_eval (envs_lookup H Δ).
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64

Tactic Notation "iMatchHyp" tactic1(tac) :=
  match goal with
  | |- context[ environments.Esnoc _ ?x ?P ] => tac x P
  end.

(** * Start a proof *)
Tactic Notation "iStartProof" :=
  lazymatch goal with
  | |- envs_entails _ _ => idtac
  | |- ?φ => notypeclasses refine (as_emp_valid_2 φ _ _);
65
               [iSolveTC || fail "iStartProof: not a BI assertion"
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
               |apply tac_adequate]
  end.

(* Same as above, with 2 differences :
   - We can specify a BI in which we want the proof to be done
   - If the goal starts with a let or a ∀, they are automatically
     introduced. *)
Tactic Notation "iStartProof" uconstr(PROP) :=
  lazymatch goal with
  | |- @envs_entails ?PROP' _ _ =>
    (* This cannot be shared with the other [iStartProof], because
    type_term has a non-negligeable performance impact. *)
    let x := type_term (eq_refl : @eq Type PROP PROP') in idtac

  (* We eta-expand [as_emp_valid_2], in order to make sure that
     [iStartProof PROP] works even if [PROP] is the carrier type. In
     this case, typing this expression will end up unifying PROP with
     [bi_car _], and hence trigger the canonical structures mechanism
     to find the corresponding bi. *)
  | |- ?φ => notypeclasses refine ((λ P : PROP, @as_emp_valid_2 φ _ P) _ _ _);
86
               [iSolveTC || fail "iStartProof: not a BI assertion"
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
               |apply tac_adequate]
  end.

(** * Generate a fresh identifier *)
(* Tactic Notation tactics cannot return terms *)
Ltac iFresh :=
  (* We need to increment the environment counter using [tac_fresh].
     But because [iFresh] returns a value, we have to let bind
     [tac_fresh] wrapped under a match to force evaluation of this
     side-effect. See https://stackoverflow.com/a/46178884 *)
  let do_incr :=
      lazymatch goal with
99
      | _ => iStartProof; eapply tac_fresh; first by (pm_reflexivity)
100
101
102
      end in
  lazymatch goal with
  |- envs_entails ?Δ _ =>
103
    let n := pm_eval (env_counter Δ) in
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
    constr:(IAnon n)
  end.

(** * Simplification *)
Tactic Notation "iEval" tactic(t) :=
  iStartProof;
  eapply tac_eval;
    [let x := fresh in intros x; t; unfold x; reflexivity
    |].

Tactic Notation "iEval" tactic(t) "in" constr(H) :=
  iStartProof;
  eapply tac_eval_in with _ H _ _ _;
117
    [pm_reflexivity || fail "iEval:" H "not found"
118
    |let x := fresh in intros x; t; unfold x; reflexivity
119
    |pm_reflexivity
120
121
    |].

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
122
123
Tactic Notation "iSimpl" := iEval (simpl).
Tactic Notation "iSimpl" "in" constr(H) := iEval (simpl) in H.
124
125
126
127
128
129

(* It would be nice to also have an `iSsrRewrite`, however, for this we need to
pass arguments to Ssreflect's `rewrite` like `/= foo /bar` in Ltac, see:

  https://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/arc/coq-club/2018-01/msg00000.html

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
130
131
PMP told me (= Robbert) in person that this is not possible with the current
Ltac, but it may be possible in Ltac2. *)
132
133
134
135

(** * Context manipulation *)
Tactic Notation "iRename" constr(H1) "into" constr(H2) :=
  eapply tac_rename with _ H1 H2 _ _; (* (i:=H1) (j:=H2) *)
136
137
138
139
140
141
    [pm_reflexivity ||
     let H1 := pretty_ident H1 in
     fail "iRename:" H1 "not found"
    |pm_reflexivity ||
     let H2 := pretty_ident H2 in
     fail "iRename:" H2 "not fresh"|].
142
143
144
145
146

Local Inductive esel_pat :=
  | ESelPure
  | ESelIdent : bool  ident  esel_pat.

Ralf Jung's avatar
Ralf Jung committed
147
Local Ltac iElaborateSelPat_go pat Δ Hs :=
148
149
150
  lazymatch pat with
  | [] => eval cbv in Hs
  | SelPure :: ?pat =>  iElaborateSelPat_go pat Δ (ESelPure :: Hs)
151
  | SelIntuitionistic :: ?pat =>
152
    let Hs' := pm_eval (env_dom (env_intuitionistic Δ)) in
153
    let Δ' := pm_eval (envs_clear_intuitionistic Δ) in
154
155
    iElaborateSelPat_go pat Δ' ((ESelIdent true <$> Hs') ++ Hs)
  | SelSpatial :: ?pat =>
156
157
    let Hs' := pm_eval (env_dom (env_spatial Δ)) in
    let Δ' := pm_eval (envs_clear_spatial Δ) in
158
159
    iElaborateSelPat_go pat Δ' ((ESelIdent false <$> Hs') ++ Hs)
  | SelIdent ?H :: ?pat =>
160
    lazymatch pm_eval (envs_lookup_delete false H Δ) with
161
    | Some (?p,_,?Δ') =>  iElaborateSelPat_go pat Δ' (ESelIdent p H :: Hs)
162
163
164
    | None =>
      let H := pretty_ident H in
      fail "iElaborateSelPat:" H "not found"
165
166
    end
  end.
167
168
169
Ltac iElaborateSelPat pat :=
  lazymatch goal with
  | |- envs_entails ?Δ _ =>
170
    let pat := sel_pat.parse pat in iElaborateSelPat_go pat Δ (@nil esel_pat)
171
172
173
174
  end.

Local Ltac iClearHyp H :=
  eapply tac_clear with _ H _ _; (* (i:=H) *)
175
176
177
    [pm_reflexivity ||
     let H := pretty_ident H in
     fail "iClear:" H "not found"
178
    |pm_reduce; iSolveTC ||
179
     let H := pretty_ident H in
180
181
182
183
     let P := match goal with |- TCOr (Affine ?P) _ => P end in
     fail "iClear:" H ":" P "not affine and the goal not absorbing"
    |].

184
185
186
187
188
189
Local Ltac iClear_go Hs :=
  lazymatch Hs with
  | [] => idtac
  | ESelPure :: ?Hs => clear; iClear_go Hs
  | ESelIdent _ ?H :: ?Hs => iClearHyp H; iClear_go Hs
  end.
190
Tactic Notation "iClear" constr(Hs) :=
191
  iStartProof; let Hs := iElaborateSelPat Hs in iClear_go Hs.
192
193
194
195
196
197
198

Tactic Notation "iClear" "(" ident_list(xs) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iClear Hs; clear xs.

(** * Assumptions *)
Tactic Notation "iExact" constr(H) :=
  eapply tac_assumption with _ H _ _; (* (i:=H) *)
199
    [pm_reflexivity ||
200
     let H := pretty_ident H in
201
     fail "iExact:" H "not found"
202
    |iSolveTC ||
203
     let H := pretty_ident H in
204
205
     let P := match goal with |- FromAssumption _ ?P _ => P end in
     fail "iExact:" H ":" P "does not match goal"
206
    |pm_reduce; iSolveTC ||
207
     let H := pretty_ident H in
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
     fail "iExact:" H "not absorbing and the remaining hypotheses not affine"].

Tactic Notation "iAssumptionCore" :=
  let rec find Γ i P :=
    lazymatch Γ with
    | Esnoc ?Γ ?j ?Q => first [unify P Q; unify i j|find Γ i P]
    end in
  match goal with
  | |- envs_lookup ?i (Envs ?Γp ?Γs _) = Some (_, ?P) =>
217
     first [is_evar i; fail 1 | pm_reflexivity]
218
  | |- envs_lookup ?i (Envs ?Γp ?Γs _) = Some (_, ?P) =>
219
     is_evar i; first [find Γp i P | find Γs i P]; pm_reflexivity
220
  | |- envs_lookup_delete _ ?i (Envs ?Γp ?Γs _) = Some (_, ?P, _) =>
221
     first [is_evar i; fail 1 | pm_reflexivity]
222
  | |- envs_lookup_delete _ ?i (Envs ?Γp ?Γs _) = Some (_, ?P, _) =>
223
     is_evar i; first [find Γp i P | find Γs i P]; pm_reflexivity
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
  end.

Tactic Notation "iAssumption" :=
  let Hass := fresh in
  let rec find p Γ Q :=
    lazymatch Γ with
    | Esnoc ?Γ ?j ?P => first
       [pose proof (_ : FromAssumption p P Q) as Hass;
        eapply (tac_assumption _ _ j p P);
233
          [pm_reflexivity
234
          |apply Hass
235
          |pm_reduce; iSolveTC ||
236
237
238
           fail 1 "iAssumption:" j "not absorbing and the remaining hypotheses not affine"]
       |assert (P = False%I) as Hass by reflexivity;
        apply (tac_false_destruct _ j p P);
239
          [pm_reflexivity
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
          |exact Hass]
       |find p Γ Q]
    end in
  lazymatch goal with
  | |- envs_entails (Envs ?Γp ?Γs _) ?Q =>
     first [find true Γp Q | find false Γs Q
           |fail "iAssumption:" Q "not found"]
  end.

(** * False *)
Tactic Notation "iExFalso" := apply tac_ex_falso.

252
253
254
(** * Making hypotheses intuitionistic or pure *)
Local Tactic Notation "iIntuitionistic" constr(H) :=
  eapply tac_intuitionistic with _ H _ _ _; (* (i:=H) *)
255
256
    [pm_reflexivity ||
     let H := pretty_ident H in
257
     fail "iIntuitionistic:" H "not found"
258
    |iSolveTC ||
259
     let P := match goal with |- IntoPersistent _ ?P _ => P end in
260
     fail "iIntuitionistic:" P "not persistent"
261
    |pm_reduce; iSolveTC ||
262
     let P := match goal with |- TCOr (Affine ?P) _ => P end in
263
     fail "iIntuitionistic:" P "not affine and the goal not absorbing"
264
    |pm_reflexivity|].
265
266
267

Local Tactic Notation "iPure" constr(H) "as" simple_intropattern(pat) :=
  eapply tac_pure with _ H _ _ _; (* (i:=H1) *)
268
269
270
    [pm_reflexivity ||
     let H := pretty_ident H in
     fail "iPure:" H "not found"
271
    |iSolveTC ||
272
273
     let P := match goal with |- IntoPure ?P _ => P end in
     fail "iPure:" P "not pure"
274
    |pm_reduce; iSolveTC ||
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
     let P := match goal with |- TCOr (Affine ?P) _ => P end in
     fail "iPure:" P "not affine and the goal not absorbing"
    |intros pat].

Tactic Notation "iEmpIntro" :=
  iStartProof;
  eapply tac_emp_intro;
282
    [pm_reduce; iSolveTC ||
283
284
285
286
287
     fail "iEmpIntro: spatial context contains non-affine hypotheses"].

Tactic Notation "iPureIntro" :=
  iStartProof;
  eapply tac_pure_intro;
288
    [pm_reflexivity
289
    |iSolveTC ||
290
291
292
293
294
295
     let P := match goal with |- FromPure _ ?P _ => P end in
     fail "iPureIntro:" P "not pure"
    |].

(** Framing *)
Local Ltac iFrameFinish :=
296
  pm_prettify;
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
  try match goal with
  | |- envs_entails _ True => by iPureIntro
  | |- envs_entails _ emp => iEmpIntro
  end.

Local Ltac iFramePure t :=
  iStartProof;
  let φ := type of t in
  eapply (tac_frame_pure _ _ _ _ t);
306
    [iSolveTC || fail "iFrame: cannot frame" φ
307
308
309
310
311
    |iFrameFinish].

Local Ltac iFrameHyp H :=
  iStartProof;
  eapply tac_frame with _ H _ _ _;
312
313
314
    [pm_reflexivity ||
     let H := pretty_ident H in
     fail "iFrame:" H "not found"
315
    |iSolveTC ||
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
     let R := match goal with |- Frame _ ?R _ _ => R end in
     fail "iFrame: cannot frame" R
    |iFrameFinish].

Local Ltac iFrameAnyPure :=
  repeat match goal with H : _ |- _ => iFramePure H end.

323
Local Ltac iFrameAnyIntuitionistic :=
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
  iStartProof;
  let rec go Hs :=
    match Hs with [] => idtac | ?H :: ?Hs => repeat iFrameHyp H; go Hs end in
  match goal with
  | |- envs_entails ?Δ _ =>
     let Hs := eval cbv in (env_dom (env_intuitionistic Δ)) in go Hs
  end.

Local Ltac iFrameAnySpatial :=
  iStartProof;
  let rec go Hs :=
    match Hs with [] => idtac | ?H :: ?Hs => try iFrameHyp H; go Hs end in
  match goal with
  | |- envs_entails ?Δ _ =>
     let Hs := eval cbv in (env_dom (env_spatial Δ)) in go Hs
  end.

Tactic Notation "iFrame" := iFrameAnySpatial.

Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 ).
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 ).
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 ).
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 ).
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) constr(t6) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 ).
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) constr(t6) constr(t7) ")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 t7 ).
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) constr(t6) constr(t7) constr(t8)")" :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 t7 t8 ).

364
365
366
367
Local Ltac iFrame_go Hs :=
  lazymatch Hs with
  | [] => idtac
  | SelPure :: ?Hs => iFrameAnyPure; iFrame_go Hs
368
  | SelIntuitionistic :: ?Hs => iFrameAnyIntuitionistic; iFrame_go Hs
369
370
371
372
  | SelSpatial :: ?Hs => iFrameAnySpatial; iFrame_go Hs
  | SelIdent ?H :: ?Hs => iFrameHyp H; iFrame_go Hs
  end.

373
Tactic Notation "iFrame" constr(Hs) :=
374
  let Hs := sel_pat.parse Hs in iFrame_go Hs.
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 ) Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 ) Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4) ")"
    constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 ) Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 ) Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) constr(t6) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 ) Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) constr(t6) constr(t7) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 t7 ) Hs.
Tactic Notation "iFrame" "(" constr(t1) constr(t2) constr(t3) constr(t4)
    constr(t5) constr(t6) constr(t7) constr(t8)")" constr(Hs) :=
  iFramePure t1; iFrame ( t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 t7 t8 ) Hs.

(** * Basic introduction tactics *)
Local Tactic Notation "iIntro" "(" simple_intropattern(x) ")" :=
  (* In the case the goal starts with an [let x := _ in _], we do not
     want to unfold x and start the proof mode. Instead, we want to
     use intros. So [iStartProof] has to be called only if [intros]
     fails *)
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
  (* We use [_ || _] instead of [first [..|..]] so that the error in the second
  branch propagates upwards. *)
  (
    (* introduction at the meta level *)
    intros x
  ) || (
    (* introduction in the logic *)
    iStartProof;
    lazymatch goal with
    | |- envs_entails _ _ =>
      eapply tac_forall_intro;
        [iSolveTC ||
         let P := match goal with |- FromForall ?P _ => P end in
         fail "iIntro: cannot turn" P "into a universal quantifier"
        |pm_prettify; intros x
         (* subgoal *)]
    end).
420
421
422
423

Local Tactic Notation "iIntro" constr(H) :=
  iStartProof;
  first
424
  [(* (?Q → _) *)
425
    eapply tac_impl_intro with _ H _ _ _; (* (i:=H) *)
426
      [iSolveTC
427
      |pm_reduce; iSolveTC ||
428
429
430
       let P := lazymatch goal with |- Persistent ?P => P end in
       fail 1 "iIntro: introducing non-persistent" H ":" P
              "into non-empty spatial context"
431
432
433
      |pm_reflexivity ||
       let H := pretty_ident H in
       fail 1 "iIntro:" H "not fresh"
434
      |iSolveTC
435
436
      |(* subgoal *)]
  |(* (_ -∗ _) *)
437
    eapply tac_wand_intro with _ H _ _; (* (i:=H) *)
438
      [iSolveTC
439
440
441
      | pm_reflexivity ||
        let H := pretty_ident H in
        fail 1 "iIntro:" H "not fresh"
442
443
      |(* subgoal *)]
  | fail 1 "iIntro: nothing to introduce" ].
444
445
446
447

Local Tactic Notation "iIntro" "#" constr(H) :=
  iStartProof;
  first
448
  [(* (?P → _) *)
449
   eapply tac_impl_intro_intuitionistic with _ H _ _ _; (* (i:=H) *)
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
     [iSolveTC
     |iSolveTC ||
      let P := match goal with |- IntoPersistent _ ?P _ => P end in
      fail 1 "iIntro:" P "not persistent"
     |pm_reflexivity ||
      let H := pretty_ident H in
      fail 1 "iIntro:" H "not fresh"
     |(* subgoal *)]
  |(* (?P -∗ _) *)
459
   eapply tac_wand_intro_intuitionistic with _ H _ _ _; (* (i:=H) *)
460
461
462
     [iSolveTC
     |iSolveTC ||
      let P := match goal with |- IntoPersistent _ ?P _ => P end in
463
      fail 1 "iIntro:" P "not intuitionistic"
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
     |iSolveTC ||
      let P := match goal with |- TCOr (Affine ?P) _ => P end in
      fail 1 "iIntro:" P "not affine and the goal not absorbing"
     |pm_reflexivity ||
      let H := pretty_ident H in
      fail 1 "iIntro:" H "not fresh"
     |(* subgoal *)]
  |fail 1 "iIntro: nothing to introduce"].
472
473

Local Tactic Notation "iIntro" "_" :=
474
  iStartProof;
475
  first
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
  [(* (?Q → _) *)
   eapply tac_impl_intro_drop;
     [iSolveTC
     |(* subgoal *)]
  |(* (_ -∗ _) *)
   eapply tac_wand_intro_drop;
     [iSolveTC
     |iSolveTC ||
      let P := match goal with |- TCOr (Affine ?P) _ => P end in
      fail 1 "iIntro:" P "not affine and the goal not absorbing"
     |(* subgoal *)]
  |(* (∀ _, _) *)
   iIntro (_)
   (* subgoal *)
  |fail 1 "iIntro: nothing to introduce"].
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513

Local Tactic Notation "iIntroForall" :=
  lazymatch goal with
  | |-  _, ?P => fail (* actually an →, this is handled by iIntro below *)
  | |-  _, _ => intro
  | |- let _ := _ in _ => intro
  | |- _ =>
    iStartProof;
    lazymatch goal with
    | |- envs_entails _ ( x : _, _) => let x' := fresh x in iIntro (x')
    end
  end.
Local Tactic Notation "iIntro" :=
  lazymatch goal with
  | |- _  ?P => intro
  | |- _ =>
    iStartProof;
    lazymatch goal with
    | |- envs_entails _ (_ - _) => iIntro (?) || let H := iFresh in iIntro #H || iIntro H
    | |- envs_entails _ (_  _) => iIntro (?) || let H := iFresh in iIntro #H || iIntro H
    end
  end.

514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
(** * Revert *)
Local Tactic Notation "iForallRevert" ident(x) :=
  let err x :=
    intros x;
    iMatchHyp (fun H P =>
      lazymatch P with
      | context [x] => fail 2 "iRevert:" x "is used in hypothesis" H
      end) in
  iStartProof;
  let A := type of x in
  lazymatch type of A with
  | Prop => revert x; first [apply tac_pure_revert|err x]
  | _ => revert x; first [apply tac_forall_revert|err x]
  end.

529
530
531
532
533
534
535
Tactic Notation "iRevertHyp" constr(H) :=
  eapply tac_revert with _ H _ _; (* (i:=H2) *)
    [pm_reflexivity ||
     let H := pretty_ident H in
     fail "iRevert:" H "not found"
    |pm_reduce].

536
537
538
539
540
541
542
Tactic Notation "iRevert" constr(Hs) :=
  let rec go Hs :=
    lazymatch Hs with
    | [] => idtac
    | ESelPure :: ?Hs =>
       repeat match goal with x : _ |- _ => revert x end;
       go Hs
543
    | ESelIdent _ ?H :: ?Hs => iRevertHyp H; go Hs
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
    end in
  iStartProof; let Hs := iElaborateSelPat Hs in go Hs.

Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x1.
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x2; iRevert ( x1 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x3; iRevert ( x1 x2 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x4; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x5; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ident(x6) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x6; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ident(x6) ident(x7) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x7; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ident(x6) ident(x7) ident(x8) ")" :=
  iForallRevert x8; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 ).

Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4) ")"
    constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ident(x6) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ident(x6) ident(x7) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 ).
Tactic Notation "iRevert" "(" ident(x1) ident(x2) ident(x3) ident(x4)
    ident(x5) ident(x6) ident(x7) ident(x8) ")" constr(Hs) :=
  iRevert Hs; iRevert ( x1 x2 x3 x4 x5 x6 x7 x8 ).

590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
(** * Specialize *)
Record iTrm {X As S} :=
  ITrm { itrm : X ; itrm_vars : hlist As ; itrm_hyps : S }.
Arguments ITrm {_ _ _} _ _ _.

Notation "( H $! x1 .. xn )" :=
  (ITrm H (hcons x1 .. (hcons xn hnil) ..) "") (at level 0, x1, xn at level 9).
Notation "( H $! x1 .. xn 'with' pat )" :=
  (ITrm H (hcons x1 .. (hcons xn hnil) ..) pat) (at level 0, x1, xn at level 9).
Notation "( H 'with' pat )" := (ITrm H hnil pat) (at level 0).

(** There is some hacky stuff going on here: because of Coq bug #6583, unresolved
type classes in the arguments `xs` are resolved at arbitrary moments. Tactics
like `apply`, `split` and `eexists` wrongly trigger type class search to resolve
these holes. To avoid TC being triggered too eagerly, this tactic uses `refine`
at most places instead of `apply`. *)
606
Local Ltac iSpecializeArgs_go H xs :=
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
  lazymatch xs with
  | hnil => idtac
  | hcons ?x ?xs =>
     notypeclasses refine (tac_forall_specialize _ _ H _ _ _ _ _ _ _);
       [pm_reflexivity ||
        let H := pretty_ident H in
        fail "iSpecialize:" H "not found"
       |iSolveTC ||
        let P := match goal with |- IntoForall ?P _ => P end in
        fail "iSpecialize: cannot instantiate" P "with" x
       |lazymatch goal with (* Force [A] in [ex_intro] to deal with coercions. *)
        | |-  _ : ?A, _ =>
          notypeclasses refine (@ex_intro A _ x (conj _ _))
        end; [shelve..|pm_reflexivity|iSpecializeArgs_go H xs]]
  end.
622
623
Local Tactic Notation "iSpecializeArgs" constr(H) open_constr(xs) :=
  iSpecializeArgs_go H xs.
624

625
Ltac iSpecializePat_go H1 pats :=
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
  let solve_to_wand H1 :=
    iSolveTC ||
    let P := match goal with |- IntoWand _ _ ?P _ _ => P end in
    fail "iSpecialize:" P "not an implication/wand" in
  let solve_done d :=
    lazymatch d with
    | true =>
       done ||
       let Q := match goal with |- envs_entails _ ?Q => Q end in
       fail "iSpecialize: cannot solve" Q "using done"
    | false => idtac
    end in
638
  lazymatch pats with
639
640
641
    | [] => idtac
    | SForall :: ?pats =>
       idtac "[IPM] The * specialization pattern is deprecated because it is applied implicitly.";
642
       iSpecializePat_go H1 pats
643
644
    | SIdent ?H2 :: ?pats =>
       notypeclasses refine (tac_specialize _ _ _ H2 _ H1 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _);
645
646
647
648
649
650
         [pm_reflexivity ||
          let H2 := pretty_ident H2 in
          fail "iSpecialize:" H2 "not found"
         |pm_reflexivity ||
          let H1 := pretty_ident H1 in
          fail "iSpecialize:" H1 "not found"
651
652
653
654
         |iSolveTC ||
          let P := match goal with |- IntoWand _ _ ?P ?Q _ => P end in
          let Q := match goal with |- IntoWand _ _ ?P ?Q _ => Q end in
          fail "iSpecialize: cannot instantiate" P "with" Q
655
         |pm_reflexivity|iSpecializePat_go H1 pats]
656
657
    | SPureGoal ?d :: ?pats =>
       notypeclasses refine (tac_specialize_assert_pure _ _ H1 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _);
658
659
660
         [pm_reflexivity ||
          let H1 := pretty_ident H1 in
          fail "iSpecialize:" H1 "not found"
661
662
663
664
         |solve_to_wand H1
         |iSolveTC ||
          let Q := match goal with |- FromPure _ ?Q _ => Q end in
          fail "iSpecialize:" Q "not pure"
665
         |pm_reflexivity
666
         |solve_done d (*goal*)
667
         |iSpecializePat_go H1 pats]
668
669
    | SGoal (SpecGoal GIntuitionistic false ?Hs_frame [] ?d) :: ?pats =>
       notypeclasses refine (tac_specialize_assert_intuitionistic _ _ _ H1 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _);
670
671
672
         [pm_reflexivity ||
          let H1 := pretty_ident H1 in
          fail "iSpecialize:" H1 "not found"
673
674
675
676
677
         |solve_to_wand H1
         |iSolveTC ||
          let Q := match goal with |- Persistent ?Q => Q end in
          fail "iSpecialize:" Q "not persistent"
         |iSolveTC
678
         |pm_reflexivity
679
         |iFrame Hs_frame; solve_done d (*goal*)
680
         |iSpecializePat_go H1 pats]
681
682
    | SGoal (SpecGoal GIntuitionistic _ _ _ _) :: ?pats =>
       fail "iSpecialize: cannot select hypotheses for intuitionistic premise"
683
684
685
    | SGoal (SpecGoal ?m ?lr ?Hs_frame ?Hs ?d) :: ?pats =>
       let Hs' := eval cbv in (if lr then Hs else Hs_frame ++ Hs) in
       notypeclasses refine (tac_specialize_assert _ _ _ _ H1 _ lr Hs' _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _);
686
687
688
         [pm_reflexivity ||
          let H1 := pretty_ident H1 in
          fail "iSpecialize:" H1 "not found"
689
690
         |solve_to_wand H1
         |lazymatch m with
691
          | GSpatial => class_apply add_modal_id
692
693
          | GModal => iSolveTC || fail "iSpecialize: goal not a modality"
          end
694
         |pm_reflexivity ||
695
696
697
          let Hs' := iMissingHyps Hs' in
          fail "iSpecialize: hypotheses" Hs' "not found"
         |iFrame Hs_frame; solve_done d (*goal*)
698
         |iSpecializePat_go H1 pats]
699
700
    | SAutoFrame GIntuitionistic :: ?pats =>
       notypeclasses refine (tac_specialize_assert_intuitionistic _ _ _ H1 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _);
701
702
703
         [pm_reflexivity ||
          let H1 := pretty_ident H1 in
          fail "iSpecialize:" H1 "not found"
704
705
706
707
         |solve_to_wand H1
         |iSolveTC ||
          let Q := match goal with |- Persistent ?Q => Q end in
          fail "iSpecialize:" Q "not persistent"
708
         |pm_reflexivity
709
         |solve [iFrame "∗ #"]
710
         |iSpecializePat_go H1 pats]
711
712
    | SAutoFrame ?m :: ?pats =>
       notypeclasses refine (tac_specialize_frame _ _ H1 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _);
713
714
715
         [pm_reflexivity ||
          let H1 := pretty_ident H1 in
          fail "iSpecialize:" H1 "not found"
716
717
         |solve_to_wand H1
         |lazymatch m with
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
718
          | GSpatial => class_apply add_modal_id
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
          | GModal => iSolveTC || fail "iSpecialize: goal not a modality"
          end
         |first
            [notypeclasses refine (tac_unlock_emp _ _ _)
            |notypeclasses refine (tac_unlock_True _ _ _)
            |iFrame "∗ #"; notypeclasses refine (tac_unlock _ _ _)
            |fail "iSpecialize: premise cannot be solved by framing"]
726
727
728
729
730
         |exact eq_refl]; iIntro H1; iSpecializePat_go H1 pats
    end.

Local Tactic Notation "iSpecializePat" open_constr(H) constr(pat) :=
  let pats := spec_pat.parse pat in iSpecializePat_go H pats.
731
732

(* The argument [p] denotes whether the conclusion of the specialized term is
733
intuitionistic. If so, one can use all spatial hypotheses for both proving the
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
premises and the remaning goal. The argument [p] can either be a Boolean or an
introduction pattern, which will be coerced into [true] when it solely contains
`#` or `%` patterns at the top-level.

In case the specialization pattern in [t] states that the modality of the goal
should be kept for one of the premises (i.e. [>[H1 .. Hn]] is used) then [p]
defaults to [false] (i.e. spatial hypotheses are not preserved). *)
Tactic Notation "iSpecializeCore" open_constr(H)
    "with" open_constr(xs) open_constr(pat) "as" constr(p) :=
743
  let p := intro_pat_intuitionistic p in
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
  let pat := spec_pat.parse pat in
  let H :=
    lazymatch type of H with
    | string => constr:(INamed H)
    | _ => H
    end in
  iSpecializeArgs H xs; [..|
  lazymatch type of H with
  | ident =>
753
    (* The lemma [tac_specialize_intuitionistic_helper] allows one to use all
754
755
    spatial hypotheses for both proving the premises of the lemma we
    specialize as well as those of the remaining goal. We can only use it when
756
757
    the result of the specialization is intuitionistic, and no modality is
    eliminated. We do not use [tac_specialize_intuitionistic_helper] in the case
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
758
759
    only universal quantifiers and no implications or wands are instantiated
    (i.e [pat = []]) because it is a.) not needed, and b.) more efficient. *)
760
761
762
763
764
    let pat := spec_pat.parse pat in
    lazymatch eval compute in
      (p && bool_decide (pat  []) && negb (existsb spec_pat_modal pat)) with
    | true =>
       (* FIXME: do something reasonable when the BI is not affine *)
765
       notypeclasses refine (tac_specialize_intuitionistic_helper _ _ H _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _);
766
767
768
         [pm_reflexivity ||
          let H := pretty_ident H in
          fail "iSpecialize:" H "not found"
769
770
         |iSpecializePat H pat;
           [..
771
           |notypeclasses refine (tac_specialize_intuitionistic_helper_done _ H _ _ _);
772
            pm_reflexivity]
773
774
775
         |iSolveTC ||
          let Q := match goal with |- IntoPersistent _ ?Q _ => Q end in
          fail "iSpecialize:" Q "not persistent"
776
         |pm_reduce; iSolveTC ||
777
778
          let Q := match goal with |- TCAnd _ (Affine ?Q) => Q end in
          fail "iSpecialize:" Q "not affine"
779
         |pm_reflexivity
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
         |(* goal *)]
    | false => iSpecializePat H pat
    end
  | _ => fail "iSpecialize:" H "should be a hypothesis, use iPoseProof instead"
  end].

Tactic Notation "iSpecializeCore" open_constr(t) "as" constr(p) :=
  lazymatch type of t with
  | string => iSpecializeCore t with hnil "" as p
  | ident => iSpecializeCore t with hnil "" as p
  | _ =>
    lazymatch t with
    | ITrm ?H ?xs ?pat => iSpecializeCore H with xs pat as p
    | _ => fail "iSpecialize:" t "should be a proof mode term"
    end
  end.

Tactic Notation "iSpecialize" open_constr(t) :=
  iSpecializeCore t as false.
Tactic Notation "iSpecialize" open_constr(t) "as" "#" :=
  iSpecializeCore t as true.

(** * Pose proof *)
(* The tactic [iIntoEmpValid] tactic solves a goal [bi_emp_valid Q]. The
argument [t] must be a Coq term whose type is of the following shape:

[∀ (x_1 : A_1) .. (x_n : A_n), φ]

and so that we have an instance `AsValid φ Q`.

Examples of such [φ]s are

- [bi_emp_valid P], in which case [Q] should be [P]
- [P1 ⊢ P2], in which case [Q] should be [P1 -∗ P2]
- [P1 ⊣⊢ P2], in which case [Q] should be [P1 ↔ P2]

The tactic instantiates each dependent argument [x_i] with an evar and generates
a goal [R] for each non-dependent argument [x_i : R].  For example, if the
original goal was [Q] and [t] has type [∀ x, P x → Q], then it generates an evar
[?x] for [x] and a subgoal [P ?x]. *)
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
Local Ltac iIntoEmpValid t :=
  let go_specialize t tT :=
    lazymatch tT with                (* We do not use hnf of tT, because, if
                                        entailment is not opaque, then it would
                                        unfold it. *)
    | ?P  ?Q => let H := fresh in assert P as H; [|iIntoEmpValid uconstr:(t H); clear H]
    |  _ : ?T, _ =>
      (* Put [T] inside an [id] to avoid TC inference from being invoked. *)
      (* This is a workarround for Coq bug #6583. *)
      let e := fresh in evar (e:id T);
      let e' := eval unfold e in e in clear e; iIntoEmpValid (t e')
    end
  in
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
    (* We try two reduction tactics for the type of t before trying to
       specialize it. We first try the head normal form in order to
       unfold all the definition that could hide an entailment.  Then,
       we try the much weaker [eval cbv zeta], because entailment is
       not necessarilly opaque, and could be unfolded by [hnf].

       However, for calling type class search, we only use [cbv zeta]
       in order to make sure we do not unfold [bi_emp_valid]. *)
    let tT := type of t in
    first
      [ let tT' := eval hnf in tT in go_specialize t tT'
      | let tT' := eval cbv zeta in tT in go_specialize t tT'
      | let tT' := eval cbv zeta in tT in
        notypeclasses refine (as_emp_valid_1 tT _ _);
847
          [iSolveTC || fail 1 "iPoseProof: not a BI assertion"
848
          |exact t]].
849

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
850
851
Tactic Notation "iPoseProofCoreHyp" constr(H) "as" constr(Hnew) :=
  eapply tac_pose_proof_hyp with _ _ H _ Hnew _;
852
    [pm_reflexivity ||
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
853
854
     let H := pretty_ident H in
     fail "iPoseProof:" H "not found"
855
    |pm_reflexivity ||
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
     let Htmp := pretty_ident Hnew in
     fail "iPoseProof:" Hnew "not fresh"
    |].

Tactic Notation "iPoseProofCoreLem"
    constr(lem) "as" constr(Hnew) "before_tc" tactic(tac) :=
  eapply tac_pose_proof with _ Hnew _; (* (j:=H) *)
    [iIntoEmpValid lem
864
    |pm_reflexivity ||
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
865
866
867
868
     let Htmp := pretty_ident Hnew in
     fail "iPoseProof:" Hnew "not fresh"
    |tac];
  (* Solve all remaining TC premises generated by [iIntoEmpValid] *)
869
  try iSolveTC.
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880

(** The tactic [iPoseProofCore lem as p lazy_tc tac] inserts the resource
described by [lem] into the context. The tactic takes a continuation [tac] as
its argument, which is called with a temporary fresh name [H] that refers to
the hypothesis containing [lem].

There are a couple of additional arguments:

- The argument [p] is like that of [iSpecialize]. It is a Boolean that denotes
  whether the conclusion of the specialized term [lem] is persistent.
- The argument [lazy_tc] denotes whether type class inference on the premises
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
881
882
  of [lem] should be performed before (if [lazy_tc = false]) or after (if
  [lazy_tc = true]) [tac H] is called.
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892

Both variants of [lazy_tc] are used in other tactics that build on top of
[iPoseProofCore]:

- The tactic [iApply] uses lazy type class inference (i.e. [lazy_tc = true]),
  so that evars can first be matched against the goal before being solved by
  type class inference.
- The tactic [iDestruct] uses eager type class inference (i.e. [lazy_tc = false])
  because it may be not possible to eliminate logical connectives before all
  type class constraints have been resolved. *)
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
Tactic Notation "iPoseProofCore" open_constr(lem)
    "as" constr(p) constr(lazy_tc) tactic(tac) :=
  iStartProof;
  let Htmp := iFresh in
  let t := lazymatch lem with ITrm ?t ?xs ?pat => t | _ => lem end in
  let t := lazymatch type of t with string => constr:(INamed t) | _ => t end in
  let spec_tac _ :=
    lazymatch lem with
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
901
    | ITrm _ ?xs ?pat => iSpecializeCore (ITrm Htmp xs pat) as p
902
903
    | _ => idtac
    end in
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
  lazymatch type of t with
  | ident => iPoseProofCoreHyp t as Htmp; spec_tac (); [..|tac Htmp]
  | _ =>
     lazymatch eval compute in lazy_tc with
     | true =>
        iPoseProofCoreLem t as Htmp before_tc (spec_tac (); [..|tac Htmp])
     | false =>
        iPoseProofCoreLem t as Htmp before_tc (spec_tac ()); [..|tac Htmp]
     end
913
914
  end.

915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
(** [iApply lem] takes an argument [lem : P₁ -∗ .. -∗ Pₙ -∗ Q] (after the
specialization patterns in [lem] have been executed), where [Q] should match
the goal, and generates new goals [P1] ... [Pₙ]. Depending on the number of
premises [n], the tactic will have the following behavior:

- If [n = 0], it will immediately solve the goal (i.e. it will not generate any
  subgoals). When working in a general BI, this means that the tactic can fail
  in case there are non-affine spatial hypotheses in the context prior to using
  the [iApply] tactic. Note that if [n = 0], the tactic behaves exactly like
  [iExact lem].
- If [n > 0] it will generate a goals [P₁] ... [Pₙ]. All spatial hypotheses
  will be transferred to the last goal, i.e. [Pₙ]; the other goals will receive
  no spatial hypotheses. If you want to control more precisely how the spatial
  hypotheses are subdivided, you should add additional introduction patterns to
  [lem]. *)

(* The helper [iApplyHypExact] takes care of the [n=0] case. It fails with level
0 if we should proceed to the [n > 0] case, and with level 1 if there is an
actual error. *)
Local Ltac iApplyHypExact H :=
  first
    [eapply tac_assumption with _ H _ _; (* (i:=H) *)
       [pm_reflexivity || fail 1
       |iSolveTC || fail 1
       |pm_reduce; iSolveTC]
    |lazymatch iTypeOf H with
     | Some (_,?Q) =>
        fail 2 "iApply:" Q "not absorbing and the remaining hypotheses not affine"
     end].
Local Ltac iApplyHypLoop H :=
  first
946
    [eapply tac_apply with _ H _ _ _;
947
      [pm_reflexivity
948
      |iSolveTC
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
      |pm_prettify (* reduce redexes created by instantiation *)]
    |iSpecializePat H "[]"; last iApplyHypLoop H].

Tactic Notation "iApplyHyp" constr(H) :=
  first
    [iApplyHypExact H
    |iApplyHypLoop H
    |lazymatch iTypeOf H with
     | Some (_,?Q) => fail 1 "iApply: cannot apply" Q
     end].
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969

Tactic Notation "iApply" open_constr(lem) :=
  iPoseProofCore lem as false true (fun H => iApplyHyp H).

(** * Disjunction *)
Tactic Notation "iLeft" :=
  iStartProof;
  eapply tac_or_l;
    [iSolveTC ||
     let P := match goal with |- FromOr ?P _ _ => P end in
     fail "iLeft:" P "not a disjunction"
970
    |(* subgoal *)].
971
972
973
974
975
976
Tactic Notation "iRight" :=
  iStartProof;
  eapply tac_or_r;
    [iSolveTC ||
     let P := match goal with |- FromOr ?P _ _ => P end in
     fail "iRight:" P "not a disjunction"
977
    |(* subgoal *)].
978
979
980

Local Tactic Notation "iOrDestruct" constr(H) "as" constr(H1) constr(H2) :=
  eapply tac_or_destruct with _ _ H _ H1 H2 _ _ _; (* (i:=H) (j1:=H1) (j2:=H2) *)
981
982
983
    [pm_reflexivity ||
     let H := pretty_ident H in
     fail "iOrDestruct:" H "not found"
984
985
986
    |iSolveTC ||
     let P := match goal with |- IntoOr ?P _ _ => P end in
     fail "iOrDestruct: cannot destruct" P
987
988
989
990
991
992
    |pm_reflexivity ||
     let H1 := pretty_ident H1 in
     fail "iOrDestruct:" H1 "not fresh"
    |pm_reflexivity ||
     let H2 := pretty_ident H2 in
     fail "iOrDestruct:" H2 "not fresh"
993
994
    |(* subgoal 1 *)
    |(* subgoal 2 *)].
995
996
997
998
999
1000
1001

(** * Conjunction and separating conjunction *)
Tactic Notation "iSplit" :=
  iStartProof;
  eapply tac_and_split;
    [iSolveTC ||
     let P := match goal with |- FromAnd ?P _ _ => P end in
1002
1003
1004
     fail "iSplit:" P "not a conjunction"
    |(* subgoal 1 *)
    |(* subgoal 2 *)].
1005
1006
1007
1008
1009
1010
1011
1012
1013

Tactic Notation "iSplitL" constr(Hs) :=
  iStartProof;
  let Hs := words Hs in
  let Hs := eval vm_compute in (INamed <$> Hs) in
  eapply tac_sep_split with _ _ Left Hs _ _; (* (js:=Hs) *)
    [iSolveTC ||
     let P := match goal with |- FromSep _ ?P _ _ => P end in
     fail "iSplitL:" P "not a separating conjunction"
1014
    |pm_reflexivity ||
1015
1016
     let Hs := iMissingHyps Hs in
     fail "iSplitL: hypotheses" Hs "not found"
1017
1018
    |(* subgoal 1 *)
    |(* subgoal 2 *)].
1019
1020
1021
1022
1023
1024
1025
1026
1027

Tactic Notation "iSplitR" constr(Hs) :=
  iStartProof;
  let Hs := words Hs in
  let Hs := eval vm_compute in (INamed <$> Hs) in
  eapply tac_sep_split with _ _ Right Hs _ _; (* (js:=Hs) *)
    [iSolveTC ||
     let P := match goal with |- FromSep _ ?P _ _ => P end in
     fail "iSplitR:" P "not a separating conjunction"
1028
    |pm_reflexivity ||
1029
1030
     let Hs := iMissingHyps Hs in
     fail "iSplitR: hypotheses" Hs "not found"
1031
1032
    |(* subgoal 1 *)
    |(* subgoal 2 *)].
1033
1034
1035
1036
1037
1038

Tactic Notation "iSplitL" := iSplitR "".
Tactic Notation "iSplitR" := iSplitL "".

Local Tactic Notation "iAndDestruct" constr(H) "as" constr(H1) constr(H2) :=
  eapply tac_and_destruct with _ H _ H1 H2 _ _ _; (* (i:=H) (j1:=H1) (j2:=H2) *)
1039
1040
1041
    [pm_reflexivity ||
     let H := pretty_ident H in
     fail "iAndDestruct:" H "not found"
1042
    |pm_reduce; iSolveTC ||
1043
1044
1045
1046
1047
1048
     let P :=
       lazymatch goal with
       | |- IntoSep ?P _ _ => P
       | |- IntoAnd _ ?P _ _ => P
       end in
     fail "iAndDestruct: cannot destruct" P
1049
1050
1051
    |pm_reflexivity ||
     let H1 := pretty_ident H1 in
     let H2 := pretty_ident H2 in
1052
     fail "iAndDestruct:" H1 "or" H2 "not fresh"
1053
    |(* subgoal *)].
1054
1055
1056

Local Tactic Notation "iAndDestructChoice" constr(H) "as" constr(d) constr(H') :=
  eapply tac_and_destruct_choice with _ H _ d H' _ _ _;
1057
1058
    [pm_reflexivity || fail "iAndDestructChoice:" H "not found"
    |pm_reduce; iSolveTC ||
1059
1060
     let P := match goal with |- TCOr (IntoAnd _ ?P _ _) _ => P end in
     fail "iAndDestructChoice: cannot destruct" P
1061
1062
    |pm_reflexivity ||
     let H' := pretty_ident H' in
1063
     fail "iAndDestructChoice:" H' "not fresh"
1064
    |(* subgoal *)].
1065
1066
1067
1068
1069
1070
1071
1072

(** * Existential *)
Tactic Notation "iExists" uconstr(x1) :=
  iStartProof;
  eapply tac_exist;
    [iSolveTC ||
     let P := match goal with |- FromExist ?P _ => P end in
     fail "iExists:" P "not an existential"
1073
1074
    |pm_prettify; eexists x1
     (* subgoal *) ].
1075
1076
1077
1078
1079
1080
1081
1082
1083
1084
1085
1086
1087
1088
1089
1090
1091
1092
1093
1094
1095
1096
1097
1098
1099

Tactic Notation "iExists" uconstr(x1) "," uconstr(x2) :=
  iExists x1; iExists x2.
Tactic Notation "iExists" uconstr(x1) "," uconstr(x2) "," uconstr(x3) :=
  iExists x1; iExists x2, x3.
Tactic Notation "iExists" uconstr(x1) "," uconstr(x2) "," uconstr(x3) ","
    uconstr(x4) :=
  iExists x1; iExists x2, x3, x4.
Tactic Notation "iExists" uconstr(x1) "," uconstr(x2) "," uconstr(x3) ","
    uconstr(x4) "," uconstr(x5) :=
  iExists x1; iExists x2, x3, x4, x5.
Tactic Notation "iExists" uconstr(x1) "," uconstr(x2) "," uconstr(x3) ","
    uconstr(x4) "," uconstr(x5) "," uconstr(x6) :=
  iExists x1; iExists x2, x3, x4, x5, x6.
Tactic Notation "iExists" uconstr(x1) "," uconstr(x2) "," uconstr(x3) ","
    uconstr(x4) "," uconstr(x5) "," uconstr(x6) "," uconstr(x7) :=
  iExists x1; iExists x2, x3, x4, x5, x6, x7.
Tactic Notation "iExists" uconstr(x1) "," uconstr(x2) "," uconstr(x3) ","
    uconstr(x4) "," uconstr(x5) "," uconstr(x6) "," uconstr(x7) ","
    uconstr(x8) :=
  iExists x1; iExists x2, x3, x4, x5, x6, x7, x8.

Local Tactic Notation "iExistDestruct" constr(H)
    "as" simple_intropattern(x) constr(Hx) :=
  eapply tac_exist_destruct with H _ Hx _ _; (* (i:=H) (j:=Hx) *)
1100
1101
1102
    [pm_reflexivity ||
     let H := pretty_ident H in
     fail "iExistDestruct:" H "not found"
1103
1104
1105
1106
1107
    |iSolveTC ||
     let P := match goal with |- IntoExist ?P _ => P end in
     fail "iExistDestruct: cannot destruct" P|];
  let y := fresh in
  intros y; eexists; split;
1108
1109
1110
    [pm_reflexivity ||
     let Hx := pretty_ident Hx in
     fail "iExistDestruct:" Hx "not fresh"
1111
1112
    |revert y; intros x
     (* subgoal *)].
1113
1114
1115
1116
1117
1118
1119
1120

(** * Modality introduction *)
Tactic Notation "iModIntro" uconstr(sel) :=
  iStartProof;
  notypeclasses refine (tac_modal_intro _ sel _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _);
    [iSolveTC ||
     fail "iModIntro: the goal is not a modality"
    |iSolveTC ||
1121
     let s := lazymatch goal with |- IntoModalIntuitionisticEnv _ _ _ ?s => s end in
1122
     lazymatch eval hnf in s with
1123
1124
     | MIEnvForall ?C => fail "iModIntro: intuitionistic context does not satisfy" C
     | MIEnvIsEmpty => fail "iModIntro: intuitionistic context is non-empty"
1125
1126
     end
    |iSolveTC ||
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
1127
     let s := lazymatch goal with |- IntoModalSpatialEnv _ _ _ ?s