proofmode.ref 12.5 KB
Newer Older
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
1 subgoal
  
  PROP : sbi
  P, Q : PROP
  ============================
  "H2" : ∀ x : nat, ⌜x = 0⌝ ∨ ⌜x = 1⌝
  --------------------------------------□
  "H" : □ (P ∨ Q)
  --------------------------------------∗
  Q ∨ P
  
1 subgoal
  
  PROP : sbi
  P, Q : PROP
  ============================
  "H2" : ∀ x : nat, ⌜x = 0⌝ ∨ ⌜x = 1⌝
  _ : P
  --------------------------------------□
  Q ∨ P
  
22
23
24
1 subgoal
  
  PROP : sbi
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
  P, Q : PROP
  Persistent0 : Persistent P
  Persistent1 : Persistent Q
  ============================
  _ : P
  _ : Q
  --------------------------------------□
  <affine> (P ∗ Q)
  
34
35
36
37
38
The command has indeed failed with message:
Ltac call to "done" failed.
No applicable tactic.
The command has indeed failed with message:
In nested Ltac calls to "iClear (constr)", "iElaborateSelPat" and
Ralf Jung's avatar
Ralf Jung committed
39
"<iris.proofmode.ltac_tactics.iElaborateSelPat_go>", last call failed.
40
Tactic failure: iElaborateSelPat: "HQ" not found.
41
42
The command has indeed failed with message:
In nested Ltac calls to "iClear (constr)", "iElaborateSelPat" and
Ralf Jung's avatar
Ralf Jung committed
43
"<iris.proofmode.ltac_tactics.iElaborateSelPat_go>", last call failed.
44
Tactic failure: iElaborateSelPat: "HQ" not found.
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
The command has indeed failed with message:
In nested Ltac calls to "iSpecialize (open_constr)",
"iSpecializeCore (open_constr) as (constr)",
"iSpecializeCore (open_constr) as (constr)",
"iSpecializeCore (open_constr) with (open_constr) (open_constr) as (constr)",
"iSpecializePat (open_constr) (constr)" and "iSpecializePat_go", last call
failed.
Tactic failure: iSpecialize: cannot instantiate (∀ _ : φ, P -∗ False)%I with
P.
The command has indeed failed with message:
In nested Ltac calls to "iSpecialize (open_constr)",
"iSpecializeCore (open_constr) as (constr)",
"iSpecializeCore (open_constr) as (constr)",
"iSpecializeCore (open_constr) with (open_constr) (open_constr) as (constr)",
"iSpecializePat (open_constr) (constr)" and "iSpecializePat_go", last call
failed.
Tactic failure: iSpecialize: cannot instantiate (⌜φ⌝ → P -∗ False)%I with P.
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
1 subgoal
  
  PROP : sbi
  P, Q : PROP
  n, m, k : nat
  ============================
  --------------------------------------∗
  ▷^(S n + S m) emp
  
1 subgoal
  
  PROP : sbi
  P, Q : PROP
  ============================
  --------------------------------------∗
  ▷ emp
  
1 subgoal
  
  PROP : sbi
  P, Q : PROP
  ============================
  --------------------------------------∗
  ▷ emp
  
87
88
89
90
91
The command has indeed failed with message:
In nested Ltac calls to "iFrame (constr)",
"<iris.proofmode.ltac_tactics.iFrame_go>" and
"<iris.proofmode.ltac_tactics.iFrameHyp>", last call failed.
Tactic failure: iFrame: cannot frame Q.
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
1 subgoal
  
  PROP : sbi
  H : BiAffine PROP
  P, Q : PROP
  ============================
  _ : □ P
  _ : Q
  --------------------------------------∗
  □ P
  
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
1 subgoal
  
  PROP : sbi
  x : nat
  l : list nat
  P : PROP
  ============================
  "HP" : P
  _ : [∗ list] y ∈ l, <affine> ⌜y = y⌝
  _ : <affine> ⌜x = x⌝ ∗ ([∗ list] y ∈ l, <affine> ⌜y = y⌝)
  --------------------------------------∗
  P
  
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
1 subgoal
  
  PROP : sbi
  x1, x2 : nat
  l1, l2 : list nat
  P : PROP
  ============================
  "HP" : P
  _ : [∗ list] y1;y2 ∈ [];l2, <affine> ⌜y1 = y2⌝
  _ : <affine> ⌜x1 = x2⌝
      ∗ ([∗ list] y1;y2 ∈ l1;(l2 ++ l2), <affine> ⌜y1 = y2⌝)
  --------------------------------------∗
  P ∨ True ∗ ([∗ list] _;_ ∈ l1;l2, True)
  
1 subgoal
  
  PROP : sbi
  Φ : nat → nat → PROP
  x1, x2 : nat
  l1, l2 : list nat
  ============================
  _ : Φ x1 x2
  _ : [∗ list] y1;y2 ∈ l1;l2, Φ y1 y2
  --------------------------------------∗
  <absorb> Φ x1 x2
  
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
1 subgoal
  
  PROP : sbi
  ============================
  "H" : □ True
  --------------------------------------∗
  True
  
1 subgoal
  
  PROP : sbi
  ============================
  "H" : emp
  --------------------------------------□
  □ emp
  
1 subgoal
  
  PROP : sbi
  ============================
  "H" : emp
  --------------------------------------□
  □ emp
  
1 subgoal
  
  PROP : sbi
  mP : option PROP
  Q, R : PROP
  ============================
  "HPQ" : mP -∗? Q
  "HQR" : Q -∗ R
  "HP" : pm_default emp mP
  --------------------------------------∗
  R
  
1 subgoal
  
  PROP : sbi
  mP : option PROP
  Q, R : PROP
  ============================
  "HP" : pm_default emp mP
  --------------------------------------∗
  pm_default emp mP
  
188
189
190
191
1 subgoal
  
  PROP : sbi
  BiFUpd0 : BiFUpd PROP
192
  P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P : PROP
193
  ============================
194
195
  "HP" : P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P
         ∗ P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P
196
  --------------------------------------∗
197
  True
198
199
200
201
  
1 subgoal
  
  PROP : sbi
202
  BiFUpd0 : BiFUpd PROP
203
  P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P : PROP
204
  ============================
205
206
  _ : P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P
      ∗ P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P
207
  --------------------------------------∗
208
  True
209
210
211
212
  
1 subgoal
  
  PROP : sbi
213
  BiFUpd0 : BiFUpd PROP
214
  P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P : PROP
215
  ============================
216
217
  "HP" : TESTNOTATION {{ P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P |
         P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P }}
218
  --------------------------------------∗
219
  True
220
221
222
223
  
1 subgoal
  
  PROP : sbi
224
  BiFUpd0 : BiFUpd PROP
225
  P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P : PROP
226
  ============================
227
228
  _ : TESTNOTATION {{ P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P |
      P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P }}
229
  --------------------------------------∗
230
  True
231
  
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
1 subgoal
  
  PROP : sbi
  BiFUpd0 : BiFUpd PROP
  PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP, QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ : PROP
  ============================
  --------------------------------------∗
  PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
  → QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ ∗ QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ ∗ QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ
  
1 subgoal
  
  PROP : sbi
  BiFUpd0 : BiFUpd PROP
  PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP, QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ : PROP
  ============================
  --------------------------------------∗
  PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
  → QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ ∗ QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ ∗ QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ
    → QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ ∗ QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ ∗ QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ
  
1 subgoal
  
  PROP : sbi
  BiFUpd0 : BiFUpd PROP
  PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP, QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ : PROP
  ============================
  --------------------------------------∗
  PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
  -∗ QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ ∗ QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ ∗ QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ
  
1 subgoal
  
  PROP : sbi
  BiFUpd0 : BiFUpd PROP
  PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP, QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ : PROP
  ============================
  --------------------------------------∗
  PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
  -∗ QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ ∗ QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ ∗ QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ
     -∗ QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ ∗ QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ ∗ QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ
  
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
1 subgoal
  
  PROP : sbi
  BiFUpd0 : BiFUpd PROP
  E : coPset.coPset
  PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP, QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ : PROP
  ============================
  --------------------------------------∗
282
283
  PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
  ={E}=∗ QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ ∗ QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ ∗ QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
  
1 subgoal
  
  PROP : sbi
  BiFUpd0 : BiFUpd PROP
  E1, E2 : coPset.coPset
  PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP, QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ : PROP
  ============================
  --------------------------------------∗
293
294
295
  PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
  ={E1,E2}=∗ QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ ∗ QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ ∗ QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ
             ={E1,E2}=∗ QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ ∗ QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ
296
  
297
298
"iAlways_spatial_non_empty"
     : string
299
300
301
302
The command has indeed failed with message:
In nested Ltac calls to "iAlways", "iModIntro" and 
"iModIntro (uconstr)", last call failed.
Tactic failure: iModIntro: spatial context is non-empty.
303
304
"iDestruct_bad_name"
     : string
305
306
307
308
The command has indeed failed with message:
In nested Ltac calls to "iDestruct (open_constr) as (constr)",
"iDestructCore (open_constr) as (constr) (tactic)" and
"iDestructCore (open_constr) as (constr) (tactic)", last call failed.
309
Tactic failure: iDestruct: "HQ" not found.
310
311
"iIntros_dup_name"
     : string
312
313
314
315
The command has indeed failed with message:
In nested Ltac calls to "iIntros (constr)", "iIntros_go" and
"iIntro (constr)", last call failed.
Tactic failure: iIntro: "HP" not fresh.
316
317
318
319
The command has indeed failed with message:
In nested Ltac calls to "iIntros ( (intropattern) )",
"iIntro ( (intropattern) )" and "intros x", last call failed.
x is already used.
320
321
"iSplit_one_of_many"
     : string
322
323
324
325
326
327
The command has indeed failed with message:
Ltac call to "iSplitL (constr)" failed.
Tactic failure: iSplitL: hypotheses ["HPx"] not found.
The command has indeed failed with message:
Ltac call to "iSplitL (constr)" failed.
Tactic failure: iSplitL: hypotheses ["HPx"] not found.
328
329
"iExact_fail"
     : string
330
331
332
The command has indeed failed with message:
Ltac call to "iExact (constr)" failed.
Tactic failure: iExact: "HQ" not found.
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
The command has indeed failed with message:
Ltac call to "iExact (constr)" failed.
Tactic failure: iExact: "HQ" : Q does not match goal.
The command has indeed failed with message:
Ltac call to "iExact (constr)" failed.
Tactic failure: iExact: "HP"
not absorbing and the remaining hypotheses not affine.
"iClear_fail"
     : string
The command has indeed failed with message:
In nested Ltac calls to "iClear (constr)", "iElaborateSelPat" and
"<iris.proofmode.ltac_tactics.iElaborateSelPat_go>", last call failed.
Tactic failure: iElaborateSelPat: "HP" not found.
The command has indeed failed with message:
In nested Ltac calls to "iClear (constr)",
"<iris.proofmode.ltac_tactics.iClear_go>" and
"<iris.proofmode.ltac_tactics.iClearHyp>", last call failed.
Tactic failure: iClear: "HP" : P not affine and the goal not absorbing.
"iSpecializeArgs_fail"
     : string
The command has indeed failed with message:
In nested Ltac calls to "iSpecialize (open_constr)",
"iSpecializeCore (open_constr) as (constr)",
"iSpecializeCore (open_constr) as (constr)",
"iSpecializeCore (open_constr) with (open_constr) (open_constr) as (constr)",
"iSpecializeArgs (constr) (open_constr)",
"<iris.proofmode.ltac_tactics.iSpecializeArgs_go>" and
"notypeclasses refine (uconstr)", last call failed.
In environment
PROP : sbi
P : PROP
The term "true" has type "bool" while it is expected to have type "nat".
"iStartProof_fail"
     : string
The command has indeed failed with message:
In nested Ltac calls to "iStartProof" and "iStartProof", last call failed.
Tactic failure: iStartProof: not a BI assertion.
"iPoseProof_fail"
     : string
The command has indeed failed with message:
In nested Ltac calls to "iPoseProof (open_constr) as (constr)" and
"iPoseProofCore (open_constr) as (constr) (constr) (tactic)", last call
failed.
Tactic failure: iPoseProof: not a BI assertion.
The command has indeed failed with message:
In nested Ltac calls to "iPoseProof (open_constr) as (constr)" and
"iPoseProofCore (open_constr) as (constr) (constr) (tactic)", last call
failed.
Tactic failure: iRename: "H" not fresh.
"iRevert_fail"
     : string
The command has indeed failed with message:
In nested Ltac calls to "iRevert (constr)", "iElaborateSelPat" and
"<iris.proofmode.ltac_tactics.iElaborateSelPat_go>", last call failed.
Tactic failure: iElaborateSelPat: "H" not found.
"iDestruct_fail"
     : string
The command has indeed failed with message:
In nested Ltac calls to "iDestruct (open_constr) as (constr)",
"iDestructCore (open_constr) as (constr) (tactic)",
"iDestructCore (open_constr) as (constr) (tactic)" and
"iDestructCore (open_constr) as (constr) (tactic)", last call failed.
Tactic failure: iDestruct: "{HP}"
should contain exactly one proper introduction pattern.
The command has indeed failed with message:
In nested Ltac calls to "iDestruct (open_constr) as (constr)",
"iDestructCore (open_constr) as (constr) (tactic)",
"iDestructCore (open_constr) as (constr) (tactic)" and
"iDestructCore (open_constr) as (constr) (tactic)", last call failed.
Tactic failure: iDestruct: (IList [[IClear (sel_patterns.SelIdent "HP")]])
invalid.
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
"iApply_fail"
     : string
The command has indeed failed with message:
In nested Ltac calls to "iApply (open_constr)",
"iPoseProofCore (open_constr) as (constr) (constr) (tactic)",
"<iris.proofmode.ltac_tactics.iPoseProofCore_go>",
"<iris.proofmode.ltac_tactics.iPoseProofCore_go>",
"<iris.proofmode.ltac_tactics.iPoseProofCore_go>", 
"goal_tac" (bound to
fun _ => <ssreflect_plugin::ssrtclseq@0> spec_tac ltac:(()) ; last  tac Htmp) and
"<ssreflect_plugin::ssrtclseq@0> spec_tac ltac:(()) ; last  tac Htmp", last
call failed.
Tactic failure: iApply: cannot apply P.