proofmode.v 10.5 KB
Newer Older
Jonas Kastberg Hinrichsen's avatar
Jonas Kastberg Hinrichsen committed
1 2 3
From iris.program_logic Require Export weakestpre.
From iris.proofmode Require Import coq_tactics.
From iris.proofmode Require Export tactics.
4
From iris.dist_lang Require Export tactics lifting.
Jonas Kastberg Hinrichsen's avatar
Jonas Kastberg Hinrichsen committed
5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288
Set Default Proof Using "Type".
Import uPred.

Lemma tac_wp_expr_eval `{heapG Σ} Δ s E Φ e e' :
  e = e' 
  envs_entails Δ (WP e' @ s; E {{ Φ }})  envs_entails Δ (WP e @ s; E {{ Φ }}).
Proof. by intros ->. Qed.

Ltac wp_expr_eval t :=
  try iStartProof;
  try (eapply tac_wp_expr_eval; [t; reflexivity|]).

Ltac wp_expr_simpl := wp_expr_eval simpl.
Ltac wp_expr_simpl_subst := wp_expr_eval simpl_subst.

Lemma tac_wp_pure `{heapG Σ} Δ Δ' s E e1 e2 φ Φ :
  PureExec φ e1 e2 
  φ 
  IntoLaterNEnvs 1 Δ Δ' 
  envs_entails Δ' (WP e2 @ s; E {{ Φ }}) 
  envs_entails Δ (WP e1 @ s; E {{ Φ }}).
Proof.
  rewrite /envs_entails=> ??? HΔ'. rewrite into_laterN_env_sound /=.
  rewrite HΔ' -wp_pure_step_later //.
Qed.

Lemma tac_wp_value `{heapG Σ} Δ s E Φ e v :
  IntoVal e v 
  envs_entails Δ (Φ v)  envs_entails Δ (WP e @ s; E {{ Φ }}).
Proof. rewrite /envs_entails=> ? ->. by apply wp_value. Qed.

Ltac wp_value_head := eapply tac_wp_value; [apply _|lazy beta].

Tactic Notation "wp_pure" open_constr(efoc) :=
  iStartProof;
  lazymatch goal with
  | |- envs_entails _ (wp ?s ?E ?e ?Q) =>
    let e := eval simpl in e in
    reshape_expr e ltac:(fun K e' =>
      unify e' efoc;
      eapply (tac_wp_pure _ _ _ _ (fill K e'));
      [apply _                        (* PureExec *)
      |try fast_done                  (* The pure condition for PureExec *)
      |apply _                        (* IntoLaters *)
      |wp_expr_simpl_subst; try wp_value_head (* new goal *)
      ])
   || fail "wp_pure: cannot find" efoc "in" e "or" efoc "is not a reduct"
  | _ => fail "wp_pure: not a 'wp'"
  end.

Tactic Notation "wp_if" := wp_pure (If _ _ _).
Tactic Notation "wp_if_true" := wp_pure (If (Lit (LitBool true)) _ _).
Tactic Notation "wp_if_false" := wp_pure (If (Lit (LitBool false)) _ _).
Tactic Notation "wp_unop" := wp_pure (UnOp _ _).
Tactic Notation "wp_binop" := wp_pure (BinOp _ _ _).
Tactic Notation "wp_op" := wp_unop || wp_binop.
Tactic Notation "wp_rec" := wp_pure (App _ _).
Tactic Notation "wp_lam" := wp_rec.
Tactic Notation "wp_let" := wp_lam.
Tactic Notation "wp_seq" := wp_lam.
Tactic Notation "wp_proj" := wp_pure (Fst _) || wp_pure (Snd _).
Tactic Notation "wp_case" := wp_pure (Case _ _ _).
Tactic Notation "wp_match" := wp_case; wp_let.

Lemma tac_wp_bind `{heapG Σ} K Δ s E Φ e f :
  f = (λ e, fill K e)  (* as an eta expanded hypothesis so that we can `simpl` it *)
  envs_entails Δ (WP e @ s; E {{ v, WP f (of_val v) @ s; E {{ Φ }} }})%I 
  envs_entails Δ (WP fill K e @ s; E {{ Φ }}).
Proof. rewrite /envs_entails=> -> ->. by apply: wp_bind. Qed.

Ltac wp_bind_core K :=
  lazymatch eval hnf in K with
  | [] => idtac
  | _ => eapply (tac_wp_bind K); [simpl; reflexivity|lazy beta]
  end.

Tactic Notation "wp_bind" open_constr(efoc) :=
  iStartProof;
  lazymatch goal with
  | |- envs_entails _ (wp ?s ?E ?e ?Q) =>
    reshape_expr e ltac:(fun K e' => unify e' efoc; wp_bind_core K)
    || fail "wp_bind: cannot find" efoc "in" e
  | _ => fail "wp_bind: not a 'wp'"
  end.

(** Heap tactics *)
Section heap.
Context `{heapG Σ}.
Implicit Types P Q : iProp Σ.
Implicit Types Φ : val  iProp Σ.
Implicit Types Δ : envs (iResUR Σ).

Lemma tac_wp_alloc Δ Δ' s E j K e v Φ :
  IntoVal e v 
  IntoLaterNEnvs 1 Δ Δ' 
  ( l,  Δ'',
    envs_app false (Esnoc Enil j (l  v)) Δ' = Some Δ'' 
    envs_entails Δ'' (WP fill K (Lit (LitLoc l)) @ s; E {{ Φ }})) 
  envs_entails Δ (WP fill K (Alloc e) @ s; E {{ Φ }}).
Proof.
  rewrite /envs_entails=> ?? HΔ.
  rewrite -wp_bind. eapply wand_apply; first exact: wp_alloc.
  rewrite left_id into_laterN_env_sound; apply later_mono, forall_intro=> l.
  destruct (HΔ l) as (Δ''&?&HΔ'). rewrite envs_app_sound //; simpl.
  by rewrite right_id HΔ'.
Qed.

Lemma tac_wp_load Δ Δ' s E i K l q v Φ :
  IntoLaterNEnvs 1 Δ Δ' 
  envs_lookup i Δ' = Some (false, l {q} v)%I 
  envs_entails Δ' (WP fill K (of_val v) @ s; E {{ Φ }}) 
  envs_entails Δ (WP fill K (Load (Lit (LitLoc l))) @ s; E {{ Φ }}).
Proof.
  rewrite /envs_entails=> ???.
  rewrite -wp_bind. eapply wand_apply; first exact: wp_load.
  rewrite into_laterN_env_sound -later_sep envs_lookup_split //; simpl.
  by apply later_mono, sep_mono_r, wand_mono.
Qed.

Lemma tac_wp_store Δ Δ' Δ'' s E i K l v e v' Φ :
  IntoVal e v' 
  IntoLaterNEnvs 1 Δ Δ' 
  envs_lookup i Δ' = Some (false, l  v)%I 
  envs_simple_replace i false (Esnoc Enil i (l  v')) Δ' = Some Δ'' 
  envs_entails Δ'' (WP fill K (Lit LitUnit) @ s; E {{ Φ }}) 
  envs_entails Δ (WP fill K (Store (Lit (LitLoc l)) e) @ s; E {{ Φ }}).
Proof.
  rewrite /envs_entails=> ?????.
  rewrite -wp_bind. eapply wand_apply; first by eapply wp_store.
  rewrite into_laterN_env_sound -later_sep envs_simple_replace_sound //; simpl.
  rewrite right_id. by apply later_mono, sep_mono_r, wand_mono.
Qed.

Lemma tac_wp_cas_fail Δ Δ' s E i K l q v e1 v1 e2 Φ :
  IntoVal e1 v1  AsVal e2 
  IntoLaterNEnvs 1 Δ Δ' 
  envs_lookup i Δ' = Some (false, l {q} v)%I  v  v1 
  envs_entails Δ' (WP fill K (Lit (LitBool false)) @ s; E {{ Φ }}) 
  envs_entails Δ (WP fill K (CAS (Lit (LitLoc l)) e1 e2) @ s; E {{ Φ }}).
Proof.
  rewrite /envs_entails=> ??????.
  rewrite -wp_bind. eapply wand_apply; first exact: wp_cas_fail.
  rewrite into_laterN_env_sound -later_sep envs_lookup_split //; simpl.
  by apply later_mono, sep_mono_r, wand_mono.
Qed.

Lemma tac_wp_cas_suc Δ Δ' Δ'' s E i K l v e1 v1 e2 v2 Φ :
  IntoVal e1 v1  IntoVal e2 v2 
  IntoLaterNEnvs 1 Δ Δ' 
  envs_lookup i Δ' = Some (false, l  v)%I  v = v1 
  envs_simple_replace i false (Esnoc Enil i (l  v2)) Δ' = Some Δ'' 
  envs_entails Δ'' (WP fill K (Lit (LitBool true)) @ s; E {{ Φ }}) 
  envs_entails Δ (WP fill K (CAS (Lit (LitLoc l)) e1 e2) @ s; E {{ Φ }}).
Proof.
  rewrite /envs_entails=> ???????; subst.
  rewrite -wp_bind. eapply wand_apply; first exact: wp_cas_suc.
  rewrite into_laterN_env_sound -later_sep envs_simple_replace_sound //; simpl.
  rewrite right_id. by apply later_mono, sep_mono_r, wand_mono.
Qed.

Lemma tac_wp_faa Δ Δ' Δ'' s E i K l i1 e2 i2 Φ :
  IntoVal e2 (LitV (LitInt i2)) 
  IntoLaterNEnvs 1 Δ Δ' 
  envs_lookup i Δ' = Some (false, l  LitV (LitInt i1))%I 
  envs_simple_replace i false (Esnoc Enil i (l  LitV (LitInt (i1 + i2)))) Δ' = Some Δ'' 
  envs_entails Δ'' (WP fill K (Lit (LitInt i1)) @ s; E {{ Φ }}) 
  envs_entails Δ (WP fill K (FAA (Lit (LitLoc l)) e2) @ s; E {{ Φ }}).
Proof.
  rewrite /envs_entails=> ?????; subst.
  rewrite -wp_bind. eapply wand_apply; first exact: (wp_faa _ _ _ i1 _ i2).
  rewrite into_laterN_env_sound -later_sep envs_simple_replace_sound //; simpl.
  rewrite right_id. by apply later_mono, sep_mono_r, wand_mono.
Qed.
End heap.

Tactic Notation "wp_apply" open_constr(lem) :=
  iPoseProofCore lem as false true (fun H =>
    lazymatch goal with
    | |- envs_entails _ (wp ?s ?E ?e ?Q) =>
      reshape_expr e ltac:(fun K e' =>
        wp_bind_core K; iApplyHyp H; try iNext; wp_expr_simpl) ||
      lazymatch iTypeOf H with
      | Some (_,?P) => fail "wp_apply: cannot apply" P
      end
    | _ => fail "wp_apply: not a 'wp'"
    end).

Tactic Notation "wp_alloc" ident(l) "as" constr(H) :=
  iStartProof;
  lazymatch goal with
  | |- envs_entails _ (wp ?s ?E ?e ?Q) =>
    first
      [reshape_expr e ltac:(fun K e' =>
         eapply (tac_wp_alloc _ _ _ _ H K); [apply _|..])
      |fail 1 "wp_alloc: cannot find 'Alloc' in" e];
    [apply _
    |first [intros l | fail 1 "wp_alloc:" l "not fresh"];
      eexists; split;
        [env_cbv; reflexivity || fail "wp_alloc:" H "not fresh"
        |wp_expr_simpl; try wp_value_head]]
  | _ => fail "wp_alloc: not a 'wp'"
  end.

Tactic Notation "wp_alloc" ident(l) :=
  let H := iFresh in wp_alloc l as H.

Tactic Notation "wp_load" :=
  iStartProof;
  lazymatch goal with
  | |- envs_entails _ (wp ?s ?E ?e ?Q) =>
    first
      [reshape_expr e ltac:(fun K e' => eapply (tac_wp_load _ _ _ _ _ K))
      |fail 1 "wp_load: cannot find 'Load' in" e];
    [apply _
    |let l := match goal with |- _ = Some (_, (?l {_} _)%I) => l end in
     iAssumptionCore || fail "wp_load: cannot find" l "↦ ?"
    |wp_expr_simpl; try wp_value_head]
  | _ => fail "wp_load: not a 'wp'"
  end.

Tactic Notation "wp_store" :=
  iStartProof;
  lazymatch goal with
  | |- envs_entails _ (wp ?s ?E ?e ?Q) =>
    first
      [reshape_expr e ltac:(fun K e' =>
         eapply (tac_wp_store _ _ _ _ _ _ K); [apply _|..])
      |fail 1 "wp_store: cannot find 'Store' in" e];
    [apply _
    |let l := match goal with |- _ = Some (_, (?l {_} _)%I) => l end in
     iAssumptionCore || fail "wp_store: cannot find" l "↦ ?"
    |env_cbv; reflexivity
    |wp_expr_simpl; try first [wp_pure (Seq (Lit LitUnit) _)|wp_value_head]]
  | _ => fail "wp_store: not a 'wp'"
  end.

Tactic Notation "wp_cas_fail" :=
  iStartProof;
  lazymatch goal with
  | |- envs_entails _ (wp ?s ?E ?e ?Q) =>
    first
      [reshape_expr e ltac:(fun K e' =>
         eapply (tac_wp_cas_fail _ _ _ _ _ K); [apply _|apply _|..])
      |fail 1 "wp_cas_fail: cannot find 'CAS' in" e];
    [apply _
    |let l := match goal with |- _ = Some (_, (?l {_} _)%I) => l end in
     iAssumptionCore || fail "wp_cas_fail: cannot find" l "↦ ?"
    |try congruence
    |wp_expr_simpl; try wp_value_head]
  | _ => fail "wp_cas_fail: not a 'wp'"
  end.

Tactic Notation "wp_cas_suc" :=
  iStartProof;
  lazymatch goal with
  | |- envs_entails _ (wp ?s ?E ?e ?Q) =>
    first
      [reshape_expr e ltac:(fun K e' =>
         eapply (tac_wp_cas_suc _ _ _ _ _ _ K); [apply _|apply _|..])
      |fail 1 "wp_cas_suc: cannot find 'CAS' in" e];
    [apply _
    |let l := match goal with |- _ = Some (_, (?l {_} _)%I) => l end in
     iAssumptionCore || fail "wp_cas_suc: cannot find" l "↦ ?"
    |try congruence
    |env_cbv; reflexivity
    |wp_expr_simpl; try wp_value_head]
  | _ => fail "wp_cas_suc: not a 'wp'"
  end.

Tactic Notation "wp_faa" :=
  iStartProof;
  lazymatch goal with
  | |- envs_entails _ (wp ?s ?E ?e ?Q) =>
    first
      [reshape_expr e ltac:(fun K e' =>
         eapply (tac_wp_faa _ _ _ _ _ _ K); [apply _|..])
      |fail 1 "wp_faa: cannot find 'CAS' in" e];
    [apply _
    |let l := match goal with |- _ = Some (_, (?l {_} _)%I) => l end in
     iAssumptionCore || fail "wp_cas_suc: cannot find" l "↦ ?"
    |env_cbv; reflexivity
    |wp_expr_simpl; try wp_value_head]
  | _ => fail "wp_faa: not a 'wp'"
  end.