proofmode.ref 6.65 KB
Newer Older
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
1 subgoal
  
  PROP : sbi
  P, Q : PROP
  ============================
  "H2" : ∀ x : nat, ⌜x = 0⌝ ∨ ⌜x = 1⌝
  --------------------------------------□
  "H" : □ (P ∨ Q)
  --------------------------------------∗
  Q ∨ P
  
1 subgoal
  
  PROP : sbi
  P, Q : PROP
  ============================
  "H2" : ∀ x : nat, ⌜x = 0⌝ ∨ ⌜x = 1⌝
  _ : P
  --------------------------------------□
  Q ∨ P
  
22
23
24
1 subgoal
  
  PROP : sbi
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
  P, Q : PROP
  Persistent0 : Persistent P
  Persistent1 : Persistent Q
  ============================
  _ : P
  _ : Q
  --------------------------------------□
  <affine> (P ∗ Q)
  
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
The command has indeed failed with message:
Ltac call to "done" failed.
No applicable tactic.
The command has indeed failed with message:
In nested Ltac calls to "iClear (constr)", "iElaborateSelPat" and
"iElaborateSelPat_go", last call failed.
Tactic failure: iElaborateSelPat: (INamed "HQ") not found.
The command has indeed failed with message:
In nested Ltac calls to "iClear (constr)", "iElaborateSelPat" and
"iElaborateSelPat_go", last call failed.
Tactic failure: iElaborateSelPat: (INamed "HQ") not found.
The command has indeed failed with message:
In nested Ltac calls to "iSpecialize (open_constr)",
"iSpecializeCore (open_constr) as (constr)",
"iSpecializeCore (open_constr) as (constr)",
"iSpecializeCore (open_constr) with (open_constr) (open_constr) as (constr)",
"iSpecializePat (open_constr) (constr)" and "iSpecializePat_go", last call
failed.
Tactic failure: iSpecialize: cannot instantiate (∀ _ : φ, P -∗ False)%I with
P.
The command has indeed failed with message:
In nested Ltac calls to "iSpecialize (open_constr)",
"iSpecializeCore (open_constr) as (constr)",
"iSpecializeCore (open_constr) as (constr)",
"iSpecializeCore (open_constr) with (open_constr) (open_constr) as (constr)",
"iSpecializePat (open_constr) (constr)" and "iSpecializePat_go", last call
failed.
Tactic failure: iSpecialize: cannot instantiate (⌜φ⌝ → P -∗ False)%I with P.
The command has indeed failed with message:
In nested Ltac calls to "iFrame (constr)",
"<iris.proofmode.ltac_tactics.iFrame_go>" and
"<iris.proofmode.ltac_tactics.iFrameHyp>", last call failed.
Tactic failure: iFrame: cannot frame Q.
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
1 subgoal
  
  PROP : sbi
  H : BiAffine PROP
  P, Q : PROP
  ============================
  _ : □ P
  _ : Q
  --------------------------------------∗
  □ P
  
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
1 subgoal
  
  PROP : sbi
  x : nat
  l : list nat
  P : PROP
  ============================
  "HP" : P
  _ : [∗ list] y ∈ l, <affine> ⌜y = y⌝
  _ : <affine> ⌜x = x⌝ ∗ ([∗ list] y ∈ l, <affine> ⌜y = y⌝)
  --------------------------------------∗
  P
  
91
92
93
94
1 subgoal
  
  PROP : sbi
  BiFUpd0 : BiFUpd PROP
95
  P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P : PROP
96
  ============================
97
98
  "HP" : P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P
         ∗ P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P
99
  --------------------------------------∗
100
  True
101
102
103
104
  
1 subgoal
  
  PROP : sbi
105
  BiFUpd0 : BiFUpd PROP
106
  P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P : PROP
107
  ============================
108
109
  _ : P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P
      ∗ P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P
110
  --------------------------------------∗
111
  True
112
113
114
115
  
1 subgoal
  
  PROP : sbi
116
  BiFUpd0 : BiFUpd PROP
117
  P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P : PROP
118
  ============================
119
120
  "HP" : TESTNOTATION {{ P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P |
         P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P }}
121
  --------------------------------------∗
122
  True
123
124
125
126
  
1 subgoal
  
  PROP : sbi
127
  BiFUpd0 : BiFUpd PROP
128
  P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P : PROP
129
  ============================
130
131
  _ : TESTNOTATION {{ P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P |
      P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P }}
132
  --------------------------------------∗
133
  True
134
  
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
1 subgoal
  
  PROP : sbi
  BiFUpd0 : BiFUpd PROP
  PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP, QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ : PROP
  ============================
  --------------------------------------∗
  PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
  → QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ ∗ QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ ∗ QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ
  
1 subgoal
  
  PROP : sbi
  BiFUpd0 : BiFUpd PROP
  PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP, QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ : PROP
  ============================
  --------------------------------------∗
  PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
  → QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ ∗ QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ ∗ QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ
    → QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ ∗ QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ ∗ QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ
  
1 subgoal
  
  PROP : sbi
  BiFUpd0 : BiFUpd PROP
  PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP, QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ : PROP
  ============================
  --------------------------------------∗
  PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
  -∗ QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ ∗ QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ ∗ QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ
  
1 subgoal
  
  PROP : sbi
  BiFUpd0 : BiFUpd PROP
  PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP, QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ : PROP
  ============================
  --------------------------------------∗
  PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
  -∗ QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ ∗ QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ ∗ QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ
     -∗ QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ ∗ QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ ∗ QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ
  
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
1 subgoal
  
  PROP : sbi
  BiFUpd0 : BiFUpd PROP
  E : coPset.coPset
  PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP, QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ : PROP
  ============================
  --------------------------------------∗
185
186
  PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
  ={E}=∗ QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ ∗ QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ ∗ QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
  
1 subgoal
  
  PROP : sbi
  BiFUpd0 : BiFUpd PROP
  E1, E2 : coPset.coPset
  PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP, QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ : PROP
  ============================
  --------------------------------------∗
196
197
198
  PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
  ={E1,E2}=∗ QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ ∗ QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ ∗ QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ
             ={E1,E2}=∗ QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ ∗ QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ
199
  
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
The command has indeed failed with message:
In nested Ltac calls to "iAlways", "iModIntro" and 
"iModIntro (uconstr)", last call failed.
Tactic failure: iModIntro: spatial context is non-empty.
The command has indeed failed with message:
In nested Ltac calls to "iDestruct (open_constr) as (constr)",
"iDestructCore (open_constr) as (constr) (tactic)" and
"iDestructCore (open_constr) as (constr) (tactic)", last call failed.
Tactic failure: iDestruct: (INamed "HQ") not found.
The command has indeed failed with message:
In nested Ltac calls to "iIntros ( (intropattern) )",
"iIntro ( (intropattern) )" and "intros x", last call failed.
x is already used.
The command has indeed failed with message:
Ltac call to "iSplitL (constr)" failed.
Tactic failure: iSplitL: hypotheses ["HPx"] not found.
The command has indeed failed with message:
Ltac call to "iSplitL (constr)" failed.
Tactic failure: iSplitL: hypotheses ["HPx"] not found.