proofmode.ref 13.1 KB
Newer Older
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
1 subgoal
  
  PROP : sbi
  P, Q : PROP
  ============================
  "H2" : ∀ x : nat, ⌜x = 0⌝ ∨ ⌜x = 1⌝
  --------------------------------------□
  "H" : □ (P ∨ Q)
  --------------------------------------∗
  Q ∨ P
  
1 subgoal
  
  PROP : sbi
  P, Q : PROP
  ============================
  "H2" : ∀ x : nat, ⌜x = 0⌝ ∨ ⌜x = 1⌝
  _ : P
  --------------------------------------□
  Q ∨ P
  
22
23
24
1 subgoal
  
  PROP : sbi
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
  P, Q : PROP
  Persistent0 : Persistent P
  Persistent1 : Persistent Q
  ============================
  _ : P
  _ : Q
  --------------------------------------□
  <affine> (P ∗ Q)
  
34
35
36
37
38
The command has indeed failed with message:
Ltac call to "done" failed.
No applicable tactic.
The command has indeed failed with message:
In nested Ltac calls to "iClear (constr)", "iElaborateSelPat" and
Ralf Jung's avatar
Ralf Jung committed
39
"<iris.proofmode.ltac_tactics.iElaborateSelPat_go>", last call failed.
40
Tactic failure: iElaborateSelPat: "HQ" not found.
41
42
The command has indeed failed with message:
In nested Ltac calls to "iClear (constr)", "iElaborateSelPat" and
Ralf Jung's avatar
Ralf Jung committed
43
"<iris.proofmode.ltac_tactics.iElaborateSelPat_go>", last call failed.
44
Tactic failure: iElaborateSelPat: "HQ" not found.
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
The command has indeed failed with message:
In nested Ltac calls to "iSpecialize (open_constr)",
"iSpecializeCore (open_constr) as (constr)",
"iSpecializeCore (open_constr) as (constr)",
"iSpecializeCore (open_constr) with (open_constr) (open_constr) as (constr)",
"iSpecializePat (open_constr) (constr)" and "iSpecializePat_go", last call
failed.
Tactic failure: iSpecialize: cannot instantiate (∀ _ : φ, P -∗ False)%I with
P.
The command has indeed failed with message:
In nested Ltac calls to "iSpecialize (open_constr)",
"iSpecializeCore (open_constr) as (constr)",
"iSpecializeCore (open_constr) as (constr)",
"iSpecializeCore (open_constr) with (open_constr) (open_constr) as (constr)",
"iSpecializePat (open_constr) (constr)" and "iSpecializePat_go", last call
failed.
Tactic failure: iSpecialize: cannot instantiate (⌜φ⌝ → P -∗ False)%I with P.
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
1 subgoal
  
  PROP : sbi
  P, Q : PROP
  n, m, k : nat
  ============================
  --------------------------------------∗
  ▷^(S n + S m) emp
  
1 subgoal
  
  PROP : sbi
  P, Q : PROP
  ============================
  --------------------------------------∗
  ▷ emp
  
1 subgoal
  
  PROP : sbi
  P, Q : PROP
  ============================
  --------------------------------------∗
  ▷ emp
  
87
88
89
90
91
The command has indeed failed with message:
In nested Ltac calls to "iFrame (constr)",
"<iris.proofmode.ltac_tactics.iFrame_go>" and
"<iris.proofmode.ltac_tactics.iFrameHyp>", last call failed.
Tactic failure: iFrame: cannot frame Q.
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
1 subgoal
  
  PROP : sbi
  H : BiAffine PROP
  P, Q : PROP
  ============================
  _ : □ P
  _ : Q
  --------------------------------------∗
  □ P
  
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
1 subgoal
  
  PROP : sbi
  x : nat
  l : list nat
  P : PROP
  ============================
  "HP" : P
  _ : [∗ list] y ∈ l, <affine> ⌜y = y⌝
  _ : [∗ list] y ∈ (x :: l), <affine> ⌜y = y⌝
  --------------------------------------∗
  P
  
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
1 subgoal
  
  PROP : sbi
  x : nat
  l : list nat
  P : PROP
  ============================
  "HP" : P
  _ : [∗ list] y ∈ l, <affine> ⌜y = y⌝
  _ : <affine> ⌜x = x⌝ ∗ ([∗ list] y ∈ l, <affine> ⌜y = y⌝)
  --------------------------------------∗
  P
  
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
1 subgoal
  
  PROP : sbi
  x1, x2 : nat
  l1, l2 : list nat
  P : PROP
  ============================
  "HP" : P
  _ : [∗ list] y1;y2 ∈ [];l2, <affine> ⌜y1 = y2⌝
  _ : [∗ list] y1;y2 ∈ (x1 :: l1);((x2 :: l2) ++ l2), <affine> ⌜y1 = y2⌝
  --------------------------------------∗
  P ∨ ([∗ list] _;_ ∈ (x1 :: l1);(x2 :: l2), True)
  
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
1 subgoal
  
  PROP : sbi
  x1, x2 : nat
  l1, l2 : list nat
  P : PROP
  ============================
  "HP" : P
  _ : [∗ list] y1;y2 ∈ [];l2, <affine> ⌜y1 = y2⌝
  _ : <affine> ⌜x1 = x2⌝
      ∗ ([∗ list] y1;y2 ∈ l1;(l2 ++ l2), <affine> ⌜y1 = y2⌝)
  --------------------------------------∗
  P ∨ True ∗ ([∗ list] _;_ ∈ l1;l2, True)
  
1 subgoal
  
  PROP : sbi
  Φ : nat → nat → PROP
  x1, x2 : nat
  l1, l2 : list nat
  ============================
  _ : Φ x1 x2
  _ : [∗ list] y1;y2 ∈ l1;l2, Φ y1 y2
  --------------------------------------∗
  <absorb> Φ x1 x2
  
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
1 subgoal
  
  PROP : sbi
  ============================
  "H" : □ True
  --------------------------------------∗
  True
  
1 subgoal
  
  PROP : sbi
  ============================
  "H" : emp
  --------------------------------------□
  □ emp
  
1 subgoal
  
  PROP : sbi
  ============================
  "H" : emp
  --------------------------------------□
  □ emp
  
1 subgoal
  
  PROP : sbi
  mP : option PROP
  Q, R : PROP
  ============================
  "HPQ" : mP -∗? Q
  "HQR" : Q -∗ R
  "HP" : pm_default emp mP
  --------------------------------------∗
  R
  
1 subgoal
  
  PROP : sbi
  mP : option PROP
  Q, R : PROP
  ============================
  "HP" : pm_default emp mP
  --------------------------------------∗
  pm_default emp mP
  
214
215
216
217
1 subgoal
  
  PROP : sbi
  BiFUpd0 : BiFUpd PROP
218
  P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P : PROP
219
  ============================
220
221
  "HP" : P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P
         ∗ P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P
222
  --------------------------------------∗
223
  True
224
225
226
227
  
1 subgoal
  
  PROP : sbi
228
  BiFUpd0 : BiFUpd PROP
229
  P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P : PROP
230
  ============================
231
232
  _ : P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P
      ∗ P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P
233
  --------------------------------------∗
234
  True
235
236
237
238
  
1 subgoal
  
  PROP : sbi
239
  BiFUpd0 : BiFUpd PROP
240
  P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P : PROP
241
  ============================
242
243
  "HP" : TESTNOTATION {{ P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P |
         P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P }}
244
  --------------------------------------∗
245
  True
246
247
248
249
  
1 subgoal
  
  PROP : sbi
250
  BiFUpd0 : BiFUpd PROP
251
  P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P : PROP
252
  ============================
253
254
  _ : TESTNOTATION {{ P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P |
      P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P_P }}
255
  --------------------------------------∗
256
  True
257
  
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
1 subgoal
  
  PROP : sbi
  BiFUpd0 : BiFUpd PROP
  PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP, QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ : PROP
  ============================
  --------------------------------------∗
  PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
  → QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ ∗ QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ ∗ QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ
  
1 subgoal
  
  PROP : sbi
  BiFUpd0 : BiFUpd PROP
  PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP, QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ : PROP
  ============================
  --------------------------------------∗
  PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
  → QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ ∗ QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ ∗ QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ
    → QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ ∗ QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ ∗ QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ
  
1 subgoal
  
  PROP : sbi
  BiFUpd0 : BiFUpd PROP
  PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP, QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ : PROP
  ============================
  --------------------------------------∗
  PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
  -∗ QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ ∗ QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ ∗ QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ
  
1 subgoal
  
  PROP : sbi
  BiFUpd0 : BiFUpd PROP
  PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP, QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ : PROP
  ============================
  --------------------------------------∗
  PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
  -∗ QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ ∗ QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ ∗ QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ
     -∗ QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ ∗ QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ ∗ QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ
  
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
1 subgoal
  
  PROP : sbi
  BiFUpd0 : BiFUpd PROP
  E : coPset.coPset
  PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP, QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ : PROP
  ============================
  --------------------------------------∗
308
309
  PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
  ={E}=∗ QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ ∗ QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ ∗ QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
  
1 subgoal
  
  PROP : sbi
  BiFUpd0 : BiFUpd PROP
  E1, E2 : coPset.coPset
  PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP, QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ : PROP
  ============================
  --------------------------------------∗
319
320
321
  PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
  ={E1,E2}=∗ QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ ∗ QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ ∗ QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ
             ={E1,E2}=∗ QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ ∗ QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ
322
  
323
324
"iAlways_spatial_non_empty"
     : string
325
326
327
328
The command has indeed failed with message:
In nested Ltac calls to "iAlways", "iModIntro" and 
"iModIntro (uconstr)", last call failed.
Tactic failure: iModIntro: spatial context is non-empty.
329
330
"iDestruct_bad_name"
     : string
331
332
333
334
The command has indeed failed with message:
In nested Ltac calls to "iDestruct (open_constr) as (constr)",
"iDestructCore (open_constr) as (constr) (tactic)" and
"iDestructCore (open_constr) as (constr) (tactic)", last call failed.
335
Tactic failure: iDestruct: "HQ" not found.
336
337
"iIntros_dup_name"
     : string
338
339
340
341
The command has indeed failed with message:
In nested Ltac calls to "iIntros (constr)", "iIntros_go" and
"iIntro (constr)", last call failed.
Tactic failure: iIntro: "HP" not fresh.
342
343
344
345
The command has indeed failed with message:
In nested Ltac calls to "iIntros ( (intropattern) )",
"iIntro ( (intropattern) )" and "intros x", last call failed.
x is already used.
346
347
"iSplit_one_of_many"
     : string
348
349
350
351
352
353
The command has indeed failed with message:
Ltac call to "iSplitL (constr)" failed.
Tactic failure: iSplitL: hypotheses ["HPx"] not found.
The command has indeed failed with message:
Ltac call to "iSplitL (constr)" failed.
Tactic failure: iSplitL: hypotheses ["HPx"] not found.
354
355
"iExact_fail"
     : string
356
357
358
The command has indeed failed with message:
Ltac call to "iExact (constr)" failed.
Tactic failure: iExact: "HQ" not found.
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
The command has indeed failed with message:
Ltac call to "iExact (constr)" failed.
Tactic failure: iExact: "HQ" : Q does not match goal.
The command has indeed failed with message:
Ltac call to "iExact (constr)" failed.
Tactic failure: iExact: "HP"
not absorbing and the remaining hypotheses not affine.
"iClear_fail"
     : string
The command has indeed failed with message:
In nested Ltac calls to "iClear (constr)", "iElaborateSelPat" and
"<iris.proofmode.ltac_tactics.iElaborateSelPat_go>", last call failed.
Tactic failure: iElaborateSelPat: "HP" not found.
The command has indeed failed with message:
In nested Ltac calls to "iClear (constr)",
"<iris.proofmode.ltac_tactics.iClear_go>" and
"<iris.proofmode.ltac_tactics.iClearHyp>", last call failed.
Tactic failure: iClear: "HP" : P not affine and the goal not absorbing.
"iSpecializeArgs_fail"
     : string
The command has indeed failed with message:
In nested Ltac calls to "iSpecialize (open_constr)",
"iSpecializeCore (open_constr) as (constr)",
"iSpecializeCore (open_constr) as (constr)",
"iSpecializeCore (open_constr) with (open_constr) (open_constr) as (constr)",
"iSpecializeArgs (constr) (open_constr)",
"<iris.proofmode.ltac_tactics.iSpecializeArgs_go>" and
"notypeclasses refine (uconstr)", last call failed.
In environment
PROP : sbi
P : PROP
The term "true" has type "bool" while it is expected to have type "nat".
"iStartProof_fail"
     : string
The command has indeed failed with message:
In nested Ltac calls to "iStartProof" and "iStartProof", last call failed.
Tactic failure: iStartProof: not a BI assertion.
"iPoseProof_fail"
     : string
The command has indeed failed with message:
In nested Ltac calls to "iPoseProof (open_constr) as (constr)" and
"iPoseProofCore (open_constr) as (constr) (constr) (tactic)", last call
failed.
Tactic failure: iPoseProof: not a BI assertion.
The command has indeed failed with message:
In nested Ltac calls to "iPoseProof (open_constr) as (constr)" and
"iPoseProofCore (open_constr) as (constr) (constr) (tactic)", last call
failed.
Tactic failure: iRename: "H" not fresh.
"iRevert_fail"
     : string
The command has indeed failed with message:
In nested Ltac calls to "iRevert (constr)", "iElaborateSelPat" and
"<iris.proofmode.ltac_tactics.iElaborateSelPat_go>", last call failed.
Tactic failure: iElaborateSelPat: "H" not found.
"iDestruct_fail"
     : string
The command has indeed failed with message:
In nested Ltac calls to "iDestruct (open_constr) as (constr)",
"iDestructCore (open_constr) as (constr) (tactic)",
"iDestructCore (open_constr) as (constr) (tactic)" and
"iDestructCore (open_constr) as (constr) (tactic)", last call failed.
Tactic failure: iDestruct: "{HP}"
should contain exactly one proper introduction pattern.
The command has indeed failed with message:
In nested Ltac calls to "iDestruct (open_constr) as (constr)",
"iDestructCore (open_constr) as (constr) (tactic)",
"iDestructCore (open_constr) as (constr) (tactic)" and
"iDestructCore (open_constr) as (constr) (tactic)", last call failed.
Tactic failure: iDestruct: (IList [[IClear (sel_patterns.SelIdent "HP")]])
invalid.
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
"iApply_fail"
     : string
The command has indeed failed with message:
In nested Ltac calls to "iApply (open_constr)",
"iPoseProofCore (open_constr) as (constr) (constr) (tactic)",
"<iris.proofmode.ltac_tactics.iPoseProofCore_go>",
"<iris.proofmode.ltac_tactics.iPoseProofCore_go>",
"<iris.proofmode.ltac_tactics.iPoseProofCore_go>", 
"goal_tac" (bound to
fun _ => <ssreflect_plugin::ssrtclseq@0> spec_tac ltac:(()) ; last  tac Htmp) and
"<ssreflect_plugin::ssrtclseq@0> spec_tac ltac:(()) ; last  tac Htmp", last
call failed.
Tactic failure: iApply: cannot apply P.