collections.v 45.5 KB
Newer Older
1
(* Copyright (c) 2012-2017, Robbert Krebbers. *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
2 3 4 5
(* This file is distributed under the terms of the BSD license. *)
(** This file collects definitions and theorems on collections. Most
importantly, it implements some tactics to automatically solve goals involving
collections. *)
6
From iris.prelude Require Export orders list.
7 8
(* FIXME: This file needs a 'Proof Using' hint, but the default we use
   everywhere makes for lots of extra ssumptions. *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
9

10 11
Instance collection_equiv `{ElemOf A C} : Equiv C := λ X Y,
   x, x  X  x  Y.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
12 13
Instance collection_subseteq `{ElemOf A C} : SubsetEq C := λ X Y,
   x, x  X  x  Y.
14 15 16
Instance collection_disjoint `{ElemOf A C} : Disjoint C := λ X Y,
   x, x  X  x  Y  False.
Typeclasses Opaque collection_equiv collection_subseteq collection_disjoint.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
17

18 19
(** * Setoids *)
Section setoids_simple.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
20 21
  Context `{SimpleCollection A C}.

22
  Global Instance collection_equivalence: @Equivalence C ().
23
  Proof.
24 25 26 27
    split.
    - done.
    - intros X Y ? x. by symmetry.
    - intros X Y Z ?? x; by trans (x  Y).
28
  Qed.
29 30 31 32 33 34
  Global Instance singleton_proper : Proper ((=) ==> ()) (singleton (B:=C)).
  Proof. apply _. Qed.
  Global Instance elem_of_proper :
    Proper ((=) ==> () ==> iff) (@elem_of A C _) | 5.
  Proof. by intros x ? <- X Y. Qed.
  Global Instance disjoint_proper: Proper (() ==> () ==> iff) (@disjoint C _).
35
  Proof.
36
    intros X1 X2 HX Y1 Y2 HY; apply forall_proper; intros x. by rewrite HX, HY.
37
  Qed.
38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49
  Global Instance union_proper : Proper (() ==> () ==> ()) (@union C _).
  Proof. intros X1 X2 HX Y1 Y2 HY x. rewrite !elem_of_union. f_equiv; auto. Qed.
  Global Instance union_list_proper: Proper (() ==> ()) (union_list (A:=C)).
  Proof. by induction 1; simpl; try apply union_proper. Qed.
  Global Instance subseteq_proper : Proper (() ==> () ==> iff) (() : relation C).
  Proof.
    intros X1 X2 HX Y1 Y2 HY. apply forall_proper; intros x. by rewrite HX, HY.
  Qed.
End setoids_simple.

Section setoids.
  Context `{Collection A C}.
50

51 52 53
  (** * Setoids *)
  Global Instance intersection_proper :
    Proper (() ==> () ==> ()) (@intersection C _).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
54
  Proof.
55
    intros X1 X2 HX Y1 Y2 HY x. by rewrite !elem_of_intersection, HX, HY.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
56
  Qed.
57 58
  Global Instance difference_proper :
     Proper (() ==> () ==> ()) (@difference C _).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
59
  Proof.
60
    intros X1 X2 HX Y1 Y2 HY x. by rewrite !elem_of_difference, HX, HY.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
61
  Qed.
62
End setoids.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
63

64 65 66 67 68
Section setoids_monad.
  Context `{CollectionMonad M}.

  Global Instance collection_fmap_proper {A B} :
    Proper (pointwise_relation _ (=) ==> () ==> ()) (@fmap M _ A B).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
69
  Proof.
70 71
    intros f1 f2 Hf X1 X2 HX x. rewrite !elem_of_fmap. f_equiv; intros z.
    by rewrite HX, Hf.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
72
  Qed.
73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84
  Global Instance collection_bind_proper {A B} :
    Proper (((=) ==> ()) ==> () ==> ()) (@mbind M _ A B).
  Proof.
    intros f1 f2 Hf X1 X2 HX x. rewrite !elem_of_bind. f_equiv; intros z.
    by rewrite HX, (Hf z z).
  Qed.
  Global Instance collection_join_proper {A} :
    Proper (() ==> ()) (@mjoin M _ A).
  Proof.
    intros X1 X2 HX x. rewrite !elem_of_join. f_equiv; intros z. by rewrite HX.
  Qed.
End setoids_monad.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
85

86 87 88 89 90
(** * Tactics *)
(** The tactic [set_unfold] transforms all occurrences of [(∪)], [(∩)], [(∖)],
[(<$>)], [∅], [{[_]}], [(≡)], and [(⊆)] into logically equivalent propositions
involving just [∈]. For example, [A → x ∈ X ∪ ∅] becomes [A → x ∈ X ∨ False].

91 92 93
This transformation is implemented using type classes instead of setoid
rewriting to ensure that we traverse each term at most once and to be able to
deal with occurences of the set operations under binders. *)
94 95 96 97 98 99 100
Class SetUnfold (P Q : Prop) := { set_unfold : P  Q }.
Arguments set_unfold _ _ {_}.
Hint Mode SetUnfold + - : typeclass_instances.

Class SetUnfoldSimpl (P Q : Prop) := { set_unfold_simpl : SetUnfold P Q }.
Hint Extern 0 (SetUnfoldSimpl _ _) => csimpl; constructor : typeclass_instances.

101
Instance set_unfold_default P : SetUnfold P P | 1000. done. Qed.
102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148
Definition set_unfold_1 `{SetUnfold P Q} : P  Q := proj1 (set_unfold P Q).
Definition set_unfold_2 `{SetUnfold P Q} : Q  P := proj2 (set_unfold P Q).

Lemma set_unfold_impl P Q P' Q' :
  SetUnfold P P'  SetUnfold Q Q'  SetUnfold (P  Q) (P'  Q').
Proof. constructor. by rewrite (set_unfold P P'), (set_unfold Q Q'). Qed.
Lemma set_unfold_and P Q P' Q' :
  SetUnfold P P'  SetUnfold Q Q'  SetUnfold (P  Q) (P'  Q').
Proof. constructor. by rewrite (set_unfold P P'), (set_unfold Q Q'). Qed.
Lemma set_unfold_or P Q P' Q' :
  SetUnfold P P'  SetUnfold Q Q'  SetUnfold (P  Q) (P'  Q').
Proof. constructor. by rewrite (set_unfold P P'), (set_unfold Q Q'). Qed.
Lemma set_unfold_iff P Q P' Q' :
  SetUnfold P P'  SetUnfold Q Q'  SetUnfold (P  Q) (P'  Q').
Proof. constructor. by rewrite (set_unfold P P'), (set_unfold Q Q'). Qed.
Lemma set_unfold_not P P' : SetUnfold P P'  SetUnfold (¬P) (¬P').
Proof. constructor. by rewrite (set_unfold P P'). Qed.
Lemma set_unfold_forall {A} (P P' : A  Prop) :
  ( x, SetUnfold (P x) (P' x))  SetUnfold ( x, P x) ( x, P' x).
Proof. constructor. naive_solver. Qed.
Lemma set_unfold_exist {A} (P P' : A  Prop) :
  ( x, SetUnfold (P x) (P' x))  SetUnfold ( x, P x) ( x, P' x).
Proof. constructor. naive_solver. Qed.

(* Avoid too eager application of the above instances (and thus too eager
unfolding of type class transparent definitions). *)
Hint Extern 0 (SetUnfold (_  _) _) =>
  class_apply set_unfold_impl : typeclass_instances.
Hint Extern 0 (SetUnfold (_  _) _) =>
  class_apply set_unfold_and : typeclass_instances.
Hint Extern 0 (SetUnfold (_  _) _) =>
  class_apply set_unfold_or : typeclass_instances.
Hint Extern 0 (SetUnfold (_  _) _) =>
  class_apply set_unfold_iff : typeclass_instances.
Hint Extern 0 (SetUnfold (¬ _) _) =>
  class_apply set_unfold_not : typeclass_instances.
Hint Extern 1 (SetUnfold ( _, _) _) =>
  class_apply set_unfold_forall : typeclass_instances.
Hint Extern 0 (SetUnfold ( _, _) _) =>
  class_apply set_unfold_exist : typeclass_instances.

Section set_unfold_simple.
  Context `{SimpleCollection A C}.
  Implicit Types x y : A.
  Implicit Types X Y : C.

  Global Instance set_unfold_empty x : SetUnfold (x  ) False.
149
  Proof. constructor. split. apply not_elem_of_empty. done. Qed.
150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162
  Global Instance set_unfold_singleton x y : SetUnfold (x  {[ y ]}) (x = y).
  Proof. constructor; apply elem_of_singleton. Qed.
  Global Instance set_unfold_union x X Y P Q :
    SetUnfold (x  X) P  SetUnfold (x  Y) Q  SetUnfold (x  X  Y) (P  Q).
  Proof.
    intros ??; constructor.
    by rewrite elem_of_union, (set_unfold (x  X) P), (set_unfold (x  Y) Q).
  Qed.
  Global Instance set_unfold_equiv_same X : SetUnfold (X  X) True | 1.
  Proof. done. Qed.
  Global Instance set_unfold_equiv_empty_l X (P : A  Prop) :
    ( x, SetUnfold (x  X) (P x))  SetUnfold (  X) ( x, ¬P x) | 5.
  Proof.
163 164
    intros ?; constructor. unfold equiv, collection_equiv.
    pose proof not_elem_of_empty; naive_solver.
165 166 167
  Qed.
  Global Instance set_unfold_equiv_empty_r (P : A  Prop) :
    ( x, SetUnfold (x  X) (P x))  SetUnfold (X  ) ( x, ¬P x) | 5.
168 169 170 171
  Proof.
    intros ?; constructor. unfold equiv, collection_equiv.
    pose proof not_elem_of_empty; naive_solver.
  Qed.
172 173 174
  Global Instance set_unfold_equiv (P Q : A  Prop) :
    ( x, SetUnfold (x  X) (P x))  ( x, SetUnfold (x  Y) (Q x)) 
    SetUnfold (X  Y) ( x, P x  Q x) | 10.
175
  Proof. constructor. apply forall_proper; naive_solver. Qed.
176 177 178
  Global Instance set_unfold_subseteq (P Q : A  Prop) :
    ( x, SetUnfold (x  X) (P x))  ( x, SetUnfold (x  Y) (Q x)) 
    SetUnfold (X  Y) ( x, P x  Q x).
179
  Proof. constructor. apply forall_proper; naive_solver. Qed.
180 181
  Global Instance set_unfold_subset (P Q : A  Prop) :
    ( x, SetUnfold (x  X) (P x))  ( x, SetUnfold (x  Y) (Q x)) 
182
    SetUnfold (X  Y) (( x, P x  Q x)  ¬∀ x, Q x  P x).
183
  Proof.
184 185
    constructor. unfold strict.
    repeat f_equiv; apply forall_proper; naive_solver.
186
  Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
187 188 189
  Global Instance set_unfold_disjoint (P Q : A  Prop) :
    ( x, SetUnfold (x  X) (P x))  ( x, SetUnfold (x  Y) (Q x)) 
    SetUnfold (X  Y) ( x, P x  Q x  False).
190
  Proof. constructor. unfold disjoint, collection_disjoint. naive_solver. Qed.
191 192 193 194 195 196

  Context `{!LeibnizEquiv C}.
  Global Instance set_unfold_equiv_same_L X : SetUnfold (X = X) True | 1.
  Proof. done. Qed.
  Global Instance set_unfold_equiv_empty_l_L X (P : A  Prop) :
    ( x, SetUnfold (x  X) (P x))  SetUnfold ( = X) ( x, ¬P x) | 5.
197
  Proof. constructor. unfold_leibniz. by apply set_unfold_equiv_empty_l. Qed.
198 199
  Global Instance set_unfold_equiv_empty_r_L (P : A  Prop) :
    ( x, SetUnfold (x  X) (P x))  SetUnfold (X = ) ( x, ¬P x) | 5.
200
  Proof. constructor. unfold_leibniz. by apply set_unfold_equiv_empty_r. Qed.
201 202 203
  Global Instance set_unfold_equiv_L (P Q : A  Prop) :
    ( x, SetUnfold (x  X) (P x))  ( x, SetUnfold (x  Y) (Q x)) 
    SetUnfold (X = Y) ( x, P x  Q x) | 10.
204
  Proof. constructor. unfold_leibniz. by apply set_unfold_equiv. Qed.
205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214
End set_unfold_simple.

Section set_unfold.
  Context `{Collection A C}.
  Implicit Types x y : A.
  Implicit Types X Y : C.

  Global Instance set_unfold_intersection x X Y P Q :
    SetUnfold (x  X) P  SetUnfold (x  Y) Q  SetUnfold (x  X  Y) (P  Q).
  Proof.
215 216
    intros ??; constructor. rewrite elem_of_intersection.
    by rewrite (set_unfold (x  X) P), (set_unfold (x  Y) Q).
217 218 219 220
  Qed.
  Global Instance set_unfold_difference x X Y P Q :
    SetUnfold (x  X) P  SetUnfold (x  Y) Q  SetUnfold (x  X  Y) (P  ¬Q).
  Proof.
221 222
    intros ??; constructor. rewrite elem_of_difference.
    by rewrite (set_unfold (x  X) P), (set_unfold (x  Y) Q).
223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244
  Qed.
End set_unfold.

Section set_unfold_monad.
  Context `{CollectionMonad M} {A : Type}.
  Implicit Types x y : A.

  Global Instance set_unfold_ret x y : SetUnfold (x  mret y) (x = y).
  Proof. constructor; apply elem_of_ret. Qed.
  Global Instance set_unfold_bind {B} (f : A  M B) X (P Q : A  Prop) :
    ( y, SetUnfold (y  X) (P y))  ( y, SetUnfold (x  f y) (Q y)) 
    SetUnfold (x  X = f) ( y, Q y  P y).
  Proof. constructor. rewrite elem_of_bind; naive_solver. Qed.
  Global Instance set_unfold_fmap {B} (f : A  B) X (P : A  Prop) :
    ( y, SetUnfold (y  X) (P y)) 
    SetUnfold (x  f <$> X) ( y, x = f y  P y).
  Proof. constructor. rewrite elem_of_fmap; naive_solver. Qed.
  Global Instance set_unfold_join (X : M (M A)) (P : M A  Prop) :
    ( Y, SetUnfold (Y  X) (P Y))  SetUnfold (x  mjoin X) ( Y, x  Y  P Y).
  Proof. constructor. rewrite elem_of_join; naive_solver. Qed.
End set_unfold_monad.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269
Section set_unfold_list.
  Context {A : Type}.
  Implicit Types x : A.
  Implicit Types l : list A.

  Global Instance set_unfold_nil x : SetUnfold (x  []) False.
  Proof. constructor; apply elem_of_nil. Qed.
  Global Instance set_unfold_cons x y l P :
    SetUnfold (x  l) P  SetUnfold (x  y :: l) (x = y  P).
  Proof. constructor. by rewrite elem_of_cons, (set_unfold (x  l) P). Qed.
  Global Instance set_unfold_app x l k P Q :
    SetUnfold (x  l) P  SetUnfold (x  k) Q  SetUnfold (x  l ++ k) (P  Q).
  Proof.
    intros ??; constructor.
    by rewrite elem_of_app, (set_unfold (x  l) P), (set_unfold (x  k) Q).
  Qed.
  Global Instance set_unfold_included l k (P Q : A  Prop) :
    ( x, SetUnfold (x  l) (P x))  ( x, SetUnfold (x  k) (Q x)) 
    SetUnfold (l  k) ( x, P x  Q x).
  Proof.
    constructor; unfold subseteq, list_subseteq.
    apply forall_proper; naive_solver.
  Qed.
End set_unfold_list.

270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278
Ltac set_unfold :=
  let rec unfold_hyps :=
    try match goal with
    | H : _ |- _ =>
       apply set_unfold_1 in H; revert H;
       first [unfold_hyps; intros H | intros H; fail 1]
    end in
  apply set_unfold_2; unfold_hyps; csimpl in *.

279 280
(** Since [firstorder] already fails or loops on very small goals generated by
[set_solver], we use the [naive_solver] tactic as a substitute. *)
281
Tactic Notation "set_solver" "by" tactic3(tac) :=
282
  try fast_done;
283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295
  intros; setoid_subst;
  set_unfold;
  intros; setoid_subst;
  try match goal with |- _  _ => apply dec_stable end;
  naive_solver tac.
Tactic Notation "set_solver" "-" hyp_list(Hs) "by" tactic3(tac) :=
  clear Hs; set_solver by tac.
Tactic Notation "set_solver" "+" hyp_list(Hs) "by" tactic3(tac) :=
  clear -Hs; set_solver by tac.
Tactic Notation "set_solver" := set_solver by idtac.
Tactic Notation "set_solver" "-" hyp_list(Hs) := clear Hs; set_solver.
Tactic Notation "set_solver" "+" hyp_list(Hs) := clear -Hs; set_solver.

296 297 298 299
Hint Extern 1000 (_  _) => set_solver : set_solver.
Hint Extern 1000 (_  _) => set_solver : set_solver.
Hint Extern 1000 (_  _) => set_solver : set_solver.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
300

301 302
(** * Collections with [∪], [∅] and [{[_]}] *)
Section simple_collection.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
303
  Context `{SimpleCollection A C}.
304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368
  Implicit Types x y : A.
  Implicit Types X Y : C.
  Implicit Types Xs Ys : list C.

  (** Equality *)
  Lemma elem_of_equiv X Y : X  Y   x, x  X  x  Y.
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.
  Lemma collection_equiv_spec X Y : X  Y  X  Y  Y  X.
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.

  (** Subset relation *)
  Global Instance collection_subseteq_antisymm: AntiSymm () (() : relation C).
  Proof. intros ??. set_solver. Qed.

  Global Instance collection_subseteq_preorder: PreOrder (() : relation C).
  Proof. split. by intros ??. intros ???; set_solver. Qed.

  Lemma subseteq_union X Y : X  Y  X  Y  Y.
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.
  Lemma subseteq_union_1 X Y : X  Y  X  Y  Y.
  Proof. by rewrite subseteq_union. Qed.
  Lemma subseteq_union_2 X Y : X  Y  Y  X  Y.
  Proof. by rewrite subseteq_union. Qed.

  Lemma union_subseteq_l X Y : X  X  Y.
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.
  Lemma union_subseteq_r X Y : Y  X  Y.
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.
  Lemma union_least X Y Z : X  Z  Y  Z  X  Y  Z.
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.

  Lemma elem_of_subseteq X Y : X  Y   x, x  X  x  Y.
  Proof. done. Qed.
  Lemma elem_of_subset X Y : X  Y  ( x, x  X  x  Y)  ¬( x, x  Y  x  X).
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.

  (** Union *)
  Lemma not_elem_of_union x X Y : x  X  Y  x  X  x  Y.
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.
  Lemma elem_of_union_l x X Y : x  X  x  X  Y.
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.
  Lemma elem_of_union_r x X Y : x  Y  x  X  Y.
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.

  Lemma union_preserving_l X Y1 Y2 : Y1  Y2  X  Y1  X  Y2.
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.
  Lemma union_preserving_r X1 X2 Y : X1  X2  X1  Y  X2  Y.
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.
  Lemma union_preserving X1 X2 Y1 Y2 : X1  X2  Y1  Y2  X1  Y1  X2  Y2.
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.

  Global Instance union_idemp : IdemP (() : relation C) ().
  Proof. intros X. set_solver. Qed.
  Global Instance union_empty_l : LeftId (() : relation C)  ().
  Proof. intros X. set_solver. Qed.
  Global Instance union_empty_r : RightId (() : relation C)  ().
  Proof. intros X. set_solver. Qed.
  Global Instance union_comm : Comm (() : relation C) ().
  Proof. intros X Y. set_solver. Qed.
  Global Instance union_assoc : Assoc (() : relation C) ().
  Proof. intros X Y Z. set_solver. Qed.

  Lemma empty_union X Y : X  Y    X    Y  .
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
369 370 371 372 373
  Lemma union_cancel_l X Y Z : Z  X  Z  Y  Z  X  Z  Y  X  Y.
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.
  Lemma union_cancel_r X Y Z : X  Z  Y  Z  X  Z  Y  Z  X  Y.
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.

374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420
  (** Empty *)
  Lemma elem_of_equiv_empty X : X     x, x  X.
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.
  Lemma elem_of_empty x : x    False.
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.
  Lemma equiv_empty X : X    X  .
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.
  Lemma union_positive_l X Y : X  Y    X  .
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.
  Lemma union_positive_l_alt X Y : X    X  Y  .
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.
  Lemma non_empty_inhabited x X : x  X  X  .
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.

  (** Singleton *)
  Lemma elem_of_singleton_1 x y : x  {[y]}  x = y.
  Proof. by rewrite elem_of_singleton. Qed.
  Lemma elem_of_singleton_2 x y : x = y  x  {[y]}.
  Proof. by rewrite elem_of_singleton. Qed.
  Lemma elem_of_subseteq_singleton x X : x  X  {[ x ]}  X.
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.
  Lemma non_empty_singleton x : ({[ x ]} : C)  .
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.
  Lemma not_elem_of_singleton x y : x  {[ y ]}  x  y.
  Proof. by rewrite elem_of_singleton. Qed.

  (** Disjointness *)
  Lemma elem_of_disjoint X Y : X  Y   x, x  X  x  Y  False.
  Proof. done. Qed.

  Global Instance disjoint_sym : Symmetric (@disjoint C _).
  Proof. intros X Y. set_solver. Qed.
  Lemma disjoint_empty_l Y :   Y.
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.
  Lemma disjoint_empty_r X : X  .
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.
  Lemma disjoint_singleton_l x Y : {[ x ]}  Y  x  Y.
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.
  Lemma disjoint_singleton_r y X : X  {[ y ]}  y  X.
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.
  Lemma disjoint_union_l X1 X2 Y : X1  X2  Y  X1  Y  X2  Y.
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.
  Lemma disjoint_union_r X Y1 Y2 : X  Y1  Y2  X  Y1  X  Y2.
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.

  (** Big unions *)
  Lemma elem_of_union_list Xs x : x   Xs   X, X  Xs  x  X.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
421 422
  Proof.
    split.
423 424
    - induction Xs; simpl; intros HXs; [by apply elem_of_empty in HXs|].
      setoid_rewrite elem_of_cons. apply elem_of_union in HXs. naive_solver.
Ralf Jung's avatar
Ralf Jung committed
425
    - intros [X [Hx]]. induction Hx; simpl; [by apply elem_of_union_l |].
426
      intros. apply elem_of_union_r; auto.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
427 428
  Qed.

429 430 431 432 433 434 435
  Lemma union_list_nil :  @nil C = .
  Proof. done. Qed.
  Lemma union_list_cons X Xs :  (X :: Xs) = X   Xs.
  Proof. done. Qed.
  Lemma union_list_singleton X :  [X]  X.
  Proof. simpl. by rewrite (right_id  _). Qed.
  Lemma union_list_app Xs1 Xs2 :  (Xs1 ++ Xs2)   Xs1   Xs2.
436
  Proof.
437 438
    induction Xs1 as [|X Xs1 IH]; simpl; [by rewrite (left_id  _)|].
    by rewrite IH, (assoc _).
439
  Qed.
440
  Lemma union_list_reverse Xs :  (reverse Xs)   Xs.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
441
  Proof.
442 443 444
    induction Xs as [|X Xs IH]; simpl; [done |].
    by rewrite reverse_cons, union_list_app,
      union_list_singleton, (comm _), IH.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
445
  Qed.
446 447 448
  Lemma union_list_preserving Xs Ys : Xs * Ys   Xs   Ys.
  Proof. induction 1; simpl; auto using union_preserving. Qed.
  Lemma empty_union_list Xs :  Xs    Forall ( ) Xs.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
449
  Proof.
450 451 452
    split.
    - induction Xs; simpl; rewrite ?empty_union; intuition.
    - induction 1 as [|?? E1 ? E2]; simpl. done. by apply empty_union.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
453 454
  Qed.

455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489
  Section leibniz.
    Context `{!LeibnizEquiv C}.

    Lemma elem_of_equiv_L X Y : X = Y   x, x  X  x  Y.
    Proof. unfold_leibniz. apply elem_of_equiv. Qed.
    Lemma collection_equiv_spec_L X Y : X = Y  X  Y  Y  X.
    Proof. unfold_leibniz. apply collection_equiv_spec. Qed.

    (** Subset relation *)
    Global Instance collection_subseteq_partialorder :
      PartialOrder (() : relation C).
    Proof. split. apply _. intros ??. unfold_leibniz. apply (anti_symm _). Qed.

    Lemma subseteq_union_L X Y : X  Y  X  Y = Y.
    Proof. unfold_leibniz. apply subseteq_union. Qed.
    Lemma subseteq_union_1_L X Y : X  Y  X  Y = Y.
    Proof. unfold_leibniz. apply subseteq_union_1. Qed.
    Lemma subseteq_union_2_L X Y : X  Y = Y  X  Y.
    Proof. unfold_leibniz. apply subseteq_union_2. Qed.

    (** Union *)
    Global Instance union_idemp_L : IdemP (@eq C) ().
    Proof. intros ?. unfold_leibniz. apply (idemp _). Qed.
    Global Instance union_empty_l_L : LeftId (@eq C)  ().
    Proof. intros ?. unfold_leibniz. apply (left_id _ _). Qed.
    Global Instance union_empty_r_L : RightId (@eq C)  ().
    Proof. intros ?. unfold_leibniz. apply (right_id _ _). Qed.
    Global Instance union_comm_L : Comm (@eq C) ().
    Proof. intros ??. unfold_leibniz. apply (comm _). Qed.
    Global Instance union_assoc_L : Assoc (@eq C) ().
    Proof. intros ???. unfold_leibniz. apply (assoc _). Qed.

    Lemma empty_union_L X Y : X  Y =   X =   Y = .
    Proof. unfold_leibniz. apply empty_union. Qed.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
490 491 492 493 494
    Lemma union_cancel_l_L X Y Z : Z  X  Z  Y  Z  X = Z  Y  X = Y.
    Proof. unfold_leibniz. apply union_cancel_l. Qed.
    Lemma union_cancel_r_L X Y Z : X  Z  Y  Z  X  Z = Y  Z  X = Y.
    Proof. unfold_leibniz. apply union_cancel_r. Qed.

495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547
    (** Empty *)
    Lemma elem_of_equiv_empty_L X : X =    x, x  X.
    Proof. unfold_leibniz. apply elem_of_equiv_empty. Qed.
    Lemma equiv_empty_L X : X    X = .
    Proof. unfold_leibniz. apply equiv_empty. Qed.
    Lemma union_positive_l_L X Y : X  Y =   X = .
    Proof. unfold_leibniz. apply union_positive_l. Qed.
    Lemma union_positive_l_alt_L X Y : X    X  Y  .
    Proof. unfold_leibniz. apply union_positive_l_alt. Qed.
    Lemma non_empty_inhabited_L x X : x  X  X  .
    Proof. unfold_leibniz. apply non_empty_inhabited. Qed.

    (** Singleton *)
    Lemma non_empty_singleton_L x : {[ x ]}  .
    Proof. unfold_leibniz. apply non_empty_singleton. Qed.

    (** Big unions *)
    Lemma union_list_singleton_L X :  [X] = X.
    Proof. unfold_leibniz. apply union_list_singleton. Qed.
    Lemma union_list_app_L Xs1 Xs2 :  (Xs1 ++ Xs2) =  Xs1   Xs2.
    Proof. unfold_leibniz. apply union_list_app. Qed.
    Lemma union_list_reverse_L Xs :  (reverse Xs) =  Xs.
    Proof. unfold_leibniz. apply union_list_reverse. Qed.
    Lemma empty_union_list_L Xs :  Xs =   Forall (= ) Xs.
    Proof. unfold_leibniz. by rewrite empty_union_list. Qed. 
  End leibniz.

  Section dec.
    Context `{ (X Y : C), Decision (X  Y)}.
    Lemma collection_subseteq_inv X Y : X  Y  X  Y  X  Y.
    Proof. destruct (decide (X  Y)); [by right|left;set_solver]. Qed.
    Lemma collection_not_subset_inv X Y : X  Y  X  Y  X  Y.
    Proof. destruct (decide (X  Y)); [by right|left;set_solver]. Qed.

    Lemma non_empty_union X Y : X  Y    X    Y  .
    Proof. rewrite empty_union. destruct (decide (X  )); intuition. Qed.
    Lemma non_empty_union_list Xs :  Xs    Exists ( ) Xs.
    Proof. rewrite empty_union_list. apply (not_Forall_Exists _). Qed.

    Context `{!LeibnizEquiv C}.
    Lemma collection_subseteq_inv_L X Y : X  Y  X  Y  X = Y.
    Proof. unfold_leibniz. apply collection_subseteq_inv. Qed.
    Lemma collection_not_subset_inv_L X Y : X  Y  X  Y  X = Y.
    Proof. unfold_leibniz. apply collection_not_subset_inv. Qed.
    Lemma non_empty_union_L X Y : X  Y    X    Y  .
    Proof. unfold_leibniz. apply non_empty_union. Qed.
    Lemma non_empty_union_list_L Xs :  Xs    Exists ( ) Xs.
    Proof. unfold_leibniz. apply non_empty_union_list. Qed.
  End dec.
End simple_collection.


(** * Collections with [∪], [∩], [∖], [∅] and [{[_]}] *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
548 549
Section collection.
  Context `{Collection A C}.
550
  Implicit Types X Y : C.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
551

552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572
  (** Intersection *)
  Lemma subseteq_intersection X Y : X  Y  X  Y  X.
  Proof. set_solver. Qed. 
  Lemma subseteq_intersection_1 X Y : X  Y  X  Y  X.
  Proof. apply subseteq_intersection. Qed.
  Lemma subseteq_intersection_2 X Y : X  Y  X  X  Y.
  Proof. apply subseteq_intersection. Qed.

  Lemma intersection_subseteq_l X Y : X  Y  X.
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.
  Lemma intersection_subseteq_r X Y : X  Y  Y.
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.
  Lemma intersection_greatest X Y Z : Z  X  Z  Y  Z  X  Y.
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.

  Lemma intersection_preserving_l X Y1 Y2 : Y1  Y2  X  Y1  X  Y2.
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.
  Lemma intersection_preserving_r X1 X2 Y : X1  X2  X1  Y  X2  Y.
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.
  Lemma intersection_preserving X1 X2 Y1 Y2 :
    X1  X2  Y1  Y2  X1  Y1  X2  Y2.
573
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.
574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585

  Global Instance intersection_idemp : IdemP (() : relation C) ().
  Proof. intros X; set_solver. Qed.
  Global Instance intersection_comm : Comm (() : relation C) ().
  Proof. intros X Y; set_solver. Qed.
  Global Instance intersection_assoc : Assoc (() : relation C) ().
  Proof. intros X Y Z; set_solver. Qed.
  Global Instance intersection_empty_l : LeftAbsorb (() : relation C)  ().
  Proof. intros X; set_solver. Qed.
  Global Instance intersection_empty_r: RightAbsorb (() : relation C)  ().
  Proof. intros X; set_solver. Qed.

586
  Lemma intersection_singletons x : ({[x]} : C)  {[x]}  {[x]}.
587
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.
588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598

  Lemma union_intersection_l X Y Z : X  (Y  Z)  (X  Y)  (X  Z).
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.
  Lemma union_intersection_r X Y Z : (X  Y)  Z  (X  Z)  (Y  Z).
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.
  Lemma intersection_union_l X Y Z : X  (Y  Z)  (X  Y)  (X  Z).
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.
  Lemma intersection_union_r X Y Z : (X  Y)  Z  (X  Z)  (Y  Z).
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.

  (** Difference *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
599
  Lemma difference_twice X Y : (X  Y)  Y  X  Y.
600
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
601
  Lemma subseteq_empty_difference X Y : X  Y  X  Y  .
602
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
603
  Lemma difference_diag X : X  X  .
604
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
605
  Lemma difference_union_distr_l X Y Z : (X  Y)  Z  X  Z  Y  Z.
606
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
607
  Lemma difference_union_distr_r X Y Z : Z  (X  Y)  (Z  X)  (Z  Y).
608
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
609
  Lemma difference_intersection_distr_l X Y Z : (X  Y)  Z  X  Z  Y  Z.
610
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.
611
  Lemma difference_disjoint X Y : X  Y  X  Y  X.
612
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
613

614 615 616 617
  (** Disjointness *)
  Lemma disjoint_intersection X Y : X  Y  X  Y  .
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
618 619
  Section leibniz.
    Context `{!LeibnizEquiv C}.
620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639

    (** Intersection *)
    Lemma subseteq_intersection_L X Y : X  Y  X  Y = X.
    Proof. unfold_leibniz. apply subseteq_intersection. Qed.
    Lemma subseteq_intersection_1_L X Y : X  Y  X  Y = X.
    Proof. unfold_leibniz. apply subseteq_intersection_1. Qed.
    Lemma subseteq_intersection_2_L X Y : X  Y = X  X  Y.
    Proof. unfold_leibniz. apply subseteq_intersection_2. Qed.

    Global Instance intersection_idemp_L : IdemP ((=) : relation C) ().
    Proof. intros ?. unfold_leibniz. apply (idemp _). Qed.
    Global Instance intersection_comm_L : Comm ((=) : relation C) ().
    Proof. intros ??. unfold_leibniz. apply (comm _). Qed.
    Global Instance intersection_assoc_L : Assoc ((=) : relation C) ().
    Proof. intros ???. unfold_leibniz. apply (assoc _). Qed.
    Global Instance intersection_empty_l_L: LeftAbsorb ((=) : relation C)  ().
    Proof. intros ?. unfold_leibniz. apply (left_absorb _ _). Qed.
    Global Instance intersection_empty_r_L: RightAbsorb ((=) : relation C)  ().
    Proof. intros ?. unfold_leibniz. apply (right_absorb _ _). Qed.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
640 641
    Lemma intersection_singletons_L x : {[x]}  {[x]} = {[x]}.
    Proof. unfold_leibniz. apply intersection_singletons. Qed.
642 643 644 645 646

    Lemma union_intersection_l_L X Y Z : X  (Y  Z) = (X  Y)  (X  Z).
    Proof. unfold_leibniz; apply union_intersection_l. Qed.
    Lemma union_intersection_r_L X Y Z : (X  Y)  Z = (X  Z)  (Y  Z).
    Proof. unfold_leibniz; apply union_intersection_r. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
647
    Lemma intersection_union_l_L X Y Z : X  (Y  Z) = (X  Y)  (X  Z).
648
    Proof. unfold_leibniz; apply intersection_union_l. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
649
    Lemma intersection_union_r_L X Y Z : (X  Y)  Z = (X  Z)  (Y  Z).
650 651 652
    Proof. unfold_leibniz; apply intersection_union_r. Qed.

    (** Difference *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665
    Lemma difference_twice_L X Y : (X  Y)  Y = X  Y.
    Proof. unfold_leibniz. apply difference_twice. Qed.
    Lemma subseteq_empty_difference_L X Y : X  Y  X  Y = .
    Proof. unfold_leibniz. apply subseteq_empty_difference. Qed.
    Lemma difference_diag_L X : X  X = .
    Proof. unfold_leibniz. apply difference_diag. Qed.
    Lemma difference_union_distr_l_L X Y Z : (X  Y)  Z = X  Z  Y  Z.
    Proof. unfold_leibniz. apply difference_union_distr_l. Qed.
    Lemma difference_union_distr_r_L X Y Z : Z  (X  Y) = (Z  X)  (Z  Y).
    Proof. unfold_leibniz. apply difference_union_distr_r. Qed.
    Lemma difference_intersection_distr_l_L X Y Z :
      (X  Y)  Z = X  Z  Y  Z.
    Proof. unfold_leibniz. apply difference_intersection_distr_l. Qed.
666 667
    Lemma difference_disjoint_L X Y : X  Y  X  Y = X.
    Proof. unfold_leibniz. apply difference_disjoint. Qed.
668 669 670 671

    (** Disjointness *)
    Lemma disjoint_intersection_L X Y : X  Y  X  Y = .
    Proof. unfold_leibniz. apply disjoint_intersection. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
672 673 674
  End leibniz.

  Section dec.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
675
    Context `{ (x : A) (X : C), Decision (x  X)}.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
676 677 678 679 680 681
    Lemma not_elem_of_intersection x X Y : x  X  Y  x  X  x  Y.
    Proof. rewrite elem_of_intersection. destruct (decide (x  X)); tauto. Qed.
    Lemma not_elem_of_difference x X Y : x  X  Y  x  X  x  Y.
    Proof. rewrite elem_of_difference. destruct (decide (x  Y)); tauto. Qed.
    Lemma union_difference X Y : X  Y  Y  X  Y  X.
    Proof.
682
      intros ? x; split; rewrite !elem_of_union, elem_of_difference; [|intuition].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
683 684
      destruct (decide (x  X)); intuition.
    Qed.
685 686 687 688 689
    Lemma subseteq_disjoint_union X Y : X  Y   Z, Y  X  Z  X  Z.
    Proof.
      split; [|set_solver].
      exists (Y  X); split; [auto using union_difference|set_solver].
    Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
690
    Lemma non_empty_difference X Y : X  Y  Y  X  .
691
    Proof. intros [HXY1 HXY2] Hdiff. destruct HXY2. set_solver. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
692
    Lemma empty_difference_subseteq X Y : X  Y    X  Y.
693
    Proof. set_solver. Qed.
694

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
695 696 697 698 699 700 701
    Context `{!LeibnizEquiv C}.
    Lemma union_difference_L X Y : X  Y  Y = X  Y  X.
    Proof. unfold_leibniz. apply union_difference. Qed.
    Lemma non_empty_difference_L X Y : X  Y  Y  X  .
    Proof. unfold_leibniz. apply non_empty_difference. Qed.
    Lemma empty_difference_subseteq_L X Y : X  Y =   X  Y.
    Proof. unfold_leibniz. apply empty_difference_subseteq. Qed.
702 703
    Lemma subseteq_disjoint_union_L X Y : X  Y   Z, Y = X  Z  X  Z.
    Proof. unfold_leibniz. apply subseteq_disjoint_union. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
704 705 706
  End dec.
End collection.

707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715

(** * Conversion of option and list *)
Definition of_option `{Singleton A C, Empty C} (mx : option A) : C :=
  match mx with None =>  | Some x => {[ x ]} end.
Fixpoint of_list `{Singleton A C, Empty C, Union C} (l : list A) : C :=
  match l with [] =>  | x :: l => {[ x ]}  of_list l end.

Section of_option_list.
  Context `{SimpleCollection A C}.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
716 717
  Implicit Types l : list A.

718 719
  Lemma elem_of_of_option (x : A) mx: x  of_option mx  mx = Some x.
  Proof. destruct mx; set_solver. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
720 721 722
  Lemma not_elem_of_of_option (x : A) mx: x  of_option mx  mx  Some x.
  Proof. by rewrite elem_of_of_option. Qed.

723 724 725 726 727 728 729
  Lemma elem_of_of_list (x : A) l : x  of_list l  x  l.
  Proof.
    split.
    - induction l; simpl; [by rewrite elem_of_empty|].
      rewrite elem_of_union,elem_of_singleton; intros [->|?]; constructor; auto.
    - induction 1; simpl; rewrite elem_of_union, elem_of_singleton; auto.
  Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
730 731 732
  Lemma not_elem_of_of_list (x : A) l : x  of_list l  x  l.
  Proof. by rewrite elem_of_of_list. Qed.

733 734 735 736 737 738 739
  Global Instance set_unfold_of_option (mx : option A) x :
    SetUnfold (x  of_option mx) (mx = Some x).
  Proof. constructor; apply elem_of_of_option. Qed.
  Global Instance set_unfold_of_list (l : list A) x P :
    SetUnfold (x  l) P  SetUnfold (x  of_list l) P.
  Proof. constructor. by rewrite elem_of_of_list, (set_unfold (x  l) P). Qed.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747
  Lemma of_list_nil : of_list (C:=C) [] = .
  Proof. done. Qed.
  Lemma of_list_cons x l : of_list (C:=C) (x :: l) = {[ x ]}  of_list l.
  Proof. done. Qed.
  Lemma of_list_app l1 l2 : of_list (C:=C) (l1 ++ l2)  of_list l1  of_list l2.
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.
  Global Instance of_list_perm : Proper (() ==> ()) (of_list (C:=C)).
  Proof. induction 1; set_solver. Qed.
748

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
749 750 751 752 753 754
  Context `{!LeibnizEquiv C}.
  Lemma of_list_app_L l1 l2 : of_list (C:=C) (l1 ++ l2) = of_list l1  of_list l2.
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.
  Global Instance of_list_perm_L : Proper (() ==> (=)) (of_list (C:=C)).
  Proof. induction 1; set_solver. Qed.
End of_option_list.
755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785


(** * Guard *)
Global Instance collection_guard `{CollectionMonad M} : MGuard M :=
  λ P dec A x, match dec with left H => x H | _ =>  end.

Section collection_monad_base.
  Context `{CollectionMonad M}.
  Lemma elem_of_guard `{Decision P} {A} (x : A) (X : M A) :
    x  guard P; X  P  x  X.
  Proof.
    unfold mguard, collection_guard; simpl; case_match;
      rewrite ?elem_of_empty; naive_solver.
  Qed.
  Lemma elem_of_guard_2 `{Decision P} {A} (x : A) (X : M A) :
    P  x  X  x  guard P; X.
  Proof. by rewrite elem_of_guard. Qed.
  Lemma guard_empty `{Decision P} {A} (X : M A) : guard P; X    ¬P  X  .
  Proof.
    rewrite !elem_of_equiv_empty; setoid_rewrite elem_of_guard.
    destruct (decide P); naive_solver.
  Qed.
  Global Instance set_unfold_guard `{Decision P} {A} (x : A) X Q :
    SetUnfold (x  X) Q  SetUnfold (x  guard P; X) (P  Q).
  Proof. constructor. by rewrite elem_of_guard, (set_unfold (x  X) Q). Qed.
  Lemma bind_empty {A B} (f : A  M B) X :
    X = f    X     x, x  X  f x  .
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.
End collection_monad_base.


Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
786
(** * Quantifiers *)
787 788 789
Definition set_Forall `{ElemOf A C} (P : A  Prop) (X : C) :=  x, x  X  P x.
Definition set_Exists `{ElemOf A C} (P : A  Prop) (X : C) :=  x, x  X  P x.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
790 791 792
Section quantifiers.
  Context `{SimpleCollection A B} (P : A  Prop).

793
  Lemma set_Forall_empty : set_Forall P .
794
  Proof. unfold set_Forall. set_solver. Qed.
795
  Lemma set_Forall_singleton x : set_Forall P {[ x ]}  P x.
796
  Proof. unfold set_Forall. set_solver. Qed.
797 798
  Lemma set_Forall_union X Y :
    set_Forall P X  set_Forall P Y  set_Forall P (X  Y).
799
  Proof. unfold set_Forall. set_solver. Qed.
800
  Lemma set_Forall_union_inv_1 X Y : set_Forall P (X  Y)  set_Forall P X.
801
  Proof. unfold set_Forall. set_solver. Qed.
802
  Lemma set_Forall_union_inv_2 X Y : set_Forall P (X  Y)  set_Forall P Y.
803
  Proof. unfold set_Forall. set_solver. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
804

805
  Lemma set_Exists_empty : ¬set_Exists P .
806
  Proof. unfold set_Exists. set_solver. Qed.
807
  Lemma set_Exists_singleton x : set_Exists P {[ x ]}  P x.
808
  Proof. unfold set_Exists. set_solver. Qed.
809
  Lemma set_Exists_union_1 X Y : set_Exists P X  set_Exists P (X  Y).
810
  Proof. unfold set_Exists. set_solver. Qed.
811
  Lemma set_Exists_union_2 X Y : set_Exists P Y  set_Exists P (X  Y).
812
  Proof. unfold set_Exists. set_solver. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
813
  Lemma set_Exists_union_inv X Y :
814
    set_Exists P (X  Y)  set_Exists P X  set_Exists P Y.
815
  Proof. unfold set_Exists. set_solver. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
816 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 824 825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832 833 834 835 836 837 838 839 840 841 842 843 844
End quantifiers.

Section more_quantifiers.
  Context `{SimpleCollection A B}.

  Lemma set_Forall_weaken (P Q : A  Prop) (Hweaken :  x, P x  Q x) X :
    set_Forall P X  set_Forall Q X.
  Proof. unfold set_Forall. naive_solver. Qed.
  Lemma set_Exists_weaken (P Q : A  Prop) (Hweaken :  x, P x  Q x) X :
    set_Exists P X  set_Exists Q X.
  Proof. unfold set_Exists. naive_solver. Qed.
End more_quantifiers.

(** * Fresh elements *)
(** We collect some properties on the [fresh] operation. In particular we
generalize [fresh] to generate lists of fresh elements. *)
Fixpoint fresh_list `{Fresh A C, Union C, Singleton A C}
    (n : nat) (X : C) : list A :=
  match n with
  | 0 => []
  | S n => let x := fresh X in x :: fresh_list n ({[ x ]}  X)
  end.
Inductive Forall_fresh `{ElemOf A C} (X : C) : list A  Prop :=
  | Forall_fresh_nil : Forall_fresh X []
  | Forall_fresh_cons x xs :
     x  xs  x  X  Forall_fresh X xs  Forall_fresh X (x :: xs).

Section fresh.
  Context `{FreshSpec A C}.
845
  Implicit Types X Y : C.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
846

847
  Global Instance fresh_proper: Proper (() ==> (=)) (fresh (C:=C)).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
848
  Proof. intros ???. by apply fresh_proper_alt, elem_of_equiv. Qed.
849 850
  Global Instance fresh_list_proper:
    Proper ((=) ==> () ==> (=)) (fresh_list (C:=C)).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
851
  Proof.
852
    intros ? n ->. induction n as [|n IH]; intros ?? E; f_equal/=; [by rewrite E|].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
853 854 855
    apply IH. by rewrite E.
  Qed.

856 857
  Lemma exist_fresh X :  x, x  X.
  Proof. exists (fresh X). apply is_fresh. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
858 859 860 861
  Lemma Forall_fresh_NoDup X xs : Forall_fresh X xs  NoDup xs.
  Proof. induction 1; by constructor. Qed.
  Lemma Forall_fresh_elem_of X xs x : Forall_fresh X xs  x  xs  x  X.
  Proof.
862
    intros HX; revert x; rewrite <-Forall_forall. by induction HX; constructor.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
863 864 865 866 867 868 869 870 871 872
  Qed.
  Lemma Forall_fresh_alt X xs :
    Forall_fresh X xs  NoDup xs   x, x  xs  x  X.
  Proof.
    split; eauto using Forall_fresh_NoDup, Forall_fresh_elem_of.
    rewrite <-Forall_forall.
    intros [Hxs Hxs']. induction Hxs; decompose_Forall_hyps; constructor; auto.
  Qed.
  Lemma Forall_fresh_subseteq X Y xs :
    Forall_fresh X xs  Y  X  Forall_fresh Y xs.
873
  Proof. rewrite !Forall_fresh_alt; set_solver. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
874 875 876 877 878 879 880

  Lemma fresh_list_length n X : length (fresh_list n X) = n.
  Proof. revert X. induction n; simpl; auto. Qed.
  Lemma fresh_list_is_fresh n X x : x  fresh_list n X  x  X.
  Proof.
    revert X. induction n as [|n IH]; intros X; simpl;[by rewrite elem_of_nil|].
    rewrite elem_of_cons; intros [->| Hin]; [apply is_fresh|].
881
    apply IH in Hin; set_solver.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
882 883 884 885
  Qed.
  Lemma NoDup_fresh_list n X : NoDup (fresh_list n X).
  Proof.
    revert X. induction n; simpl; constructor; auto.
886
    intros Hin; apply fresh_list_is_fresh in Hin; set_solver.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
887 888 889 890 891 892 893 894 895 896 897
  Qed.
  Lemma Forall_fresh_list X n : Forall_fresh X (fresh_list n X).
  Proof.
    rewrite Forall_fresh_alt; eauto using NoDup_fresh_list, fresh_list_is_fresh.
  Qed.
End fresh.

(** * Properties of implementations of collections that form a monad *)
Section collection_monad.
  Context `{CollectionMonad M}.

898 899
  Global Instance collection_fmap_mono {A B} :
    Proper (pointwise_relation _ (=) ==> () ==> ()) (@fmap M _ A B).
900
  Proof. intros f g ? X Y ?; set_solver by eauto. Qed.
901 902
  Global Instance collection_bind_mono {A B} :
    Proper (((=) ==> ()) ==> () ==> ()) (@mbind M _ A B).
903
  Proof. unfold respectful; intros f g Hfg X Y ?; set_solver. Qed.