Commit 373c84a5 authored by Robbert Krebbers's avatar Robbert Krebbers

Fix typo.

parent 8fda5e97
Pipeline #16658 passed with stage
in 2 minutes and 46 seconds
......@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ Lemma swap_spec x y v1 v2 :
Which is logically equivalent to [ P -∗ WP e {{ x, x = v ∗ Q }} ]
In practice, the "Texan triple" is not more difficult to prove, but usually
easier to use other proofs, because the post-condition does not have to
easier to use in other proofs, because the post-condition does not have to
syntactically match [Q]. Using this way of stating specifications, the
consequence and framing rule is implicitly applied on the post-condition.
......
......@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ Lemma swap_spec x y v1 v2 :
Which is logically equivalent to [ P -∗ WP e {{ x, x = v ∗ Q }} ]
In practice, the "Texan triple" is not more difficult to prove, but usually
easier to use other proofs, because the post-condition does not have to
easier to use in other proofs, because the post-condition does not have to
syntactically match [Q]. Using this way of stating specifications, the
consequence and framing rule is implicitly applied on the post-condition.
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment