From 373c84a5a8db69c28e8bf2a2ce11bf8074d78623 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Robbert Krebbers
Date: Sun, 12 May 2019 22:46:37 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Fix typo.
---
exercises/ex_01_swap.v | 2 +-
solutions/ex_01_swap.v | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/exercises/ex_01_swap.v b/exercises/ex_01_swap.v
index 1a51665..64f1da7 100644
--- a/exercises/ex_01_swap.v
+++ b/exercises/ex_01_swap.v
@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ Lemma swap_spec x y v1 v2 :
Which is logically equivalent to [ P -∗ WP e {{ x, x = v ∗ Q }} ]
In practice, the "Texan triple" is not more difficult to prove, but usually
- easier to use other proofs, because the post-condition does not have to
+ easier to use in other proofs, because the post-condition does not have to
syntactically match [Q]. Using this way of stating specifications, the
consequence and framing rule is implicitly applied on the post-condition.
diff --git a/solutions/ex_01_swap.v b/solutions/ex_01_swap.v
index 6a10f86..31ded30 100644
--- a/solutions/ex_01_swap.v
+++ b/solutions/ex_01_swap.v
@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ Lemma swap_spec x y v1 v2 :
Which is logically equivalent to [ P -∗ WP e {{ x, x = v ∗ Q }} ]
In practice, the "Texan triple" is not more difficult to prove, but usually
- easier to use other proofs, because the post-condition does not have to
+ easier to use in other proofs, because the post-condition does not have to
syntactically match [Q]. Using this way of stating specifications, the
consequence and framing rule is implicitly applied on the post-condition.
--
GitLab