stdpp merge requestshttps://gitlab.mpi-sws.org/iris/stdpp/-/merge_requests2020-08-28T13:21:34Zhttps://gitlab.mpi-sws.org/iris/stdpp/-/merge_requests/178Add `insert_replicate_strong`.2020-08-28T13:21:34ZDan FruminAdd `insert_replicate_strong`.https://gitlab.mpi-sws.org/iris/stdpp/-/merge_requests/176Remove `map` infix in lemmas about `dom` and `filter`.2020-07-17T12:51:49ZRobbert KrebbersRemove `map` infix in lemmas about `dom` and `filter`.The combination of `dom` and `filter` only makes sense for maps, so the `map` infix is useless. Other similar lemmas do not have such an infix either, so it's also inconsistent.
Rename `dom_map filter` → `dom_filter`, `dom_map_filter_...The combination of `dom` and `filter` only makes sense for maps, so the `map` infix is useless. Other similar lemmas do not have such an infix either, so it's also inconsistent.
Rename `dom_map filter` → `dom_filter`, `dom_map_filter_L` → `dom_filter_L`, and `dom_map_filter_subseteq` → `dom_filter_subseteq`.
This was pointed out by @atrieu in https://gitlab.mpi-sws.org/iris/stdpp/-/merge_requests/175#note_53746https://gitlab.mpi-sws.org/iris/stdpp/-/merge_requests/175Additional lemmas about map_imap2020-07-16T12:02:33ZAlix TrieuAdditional lemmas about map_imapSome lemmas that were useful to me in a development.Some lemmas that were useful to me in a development.https://gitlab.mpi-sws.org/iris/stdpp/-/merge_requests/174LICENSE: Clarify which BSD license is being used2020-07-10T21:50:17ZPaolo G. GiarrussoLICENSE: Clarify which BSD license is being usedSister MR to https://gitlab.mpi-sws.org/iris/iris/-/merge_requests/472.Sister MR to https://gitlab.mpi-sws.org/iris/iris/-/merge_requests/472.https://gitlab.mpi-sws.org/iris/stdpp/-/merge_requests/173prove NoDup_fmap_2_strong2020-07-15T16:45:29ZRalf Jungjung@mpi-sws.orgprove NoDup_fmap_2_strongAnother lemma that I just needed in Perennial.Another lemma that I just needed in Perennial.https://gitlab.mpi-sws.org/iris/stdpp/-/merge_requests/172Lemmas about "filter" on maps2020-07-15T17:07:02ZRalf Jungjung@mpi-sws.orgLemmas about "filter" on mapsThese are some lemmas from Perennial about "filter" on maps. Most are by me; `map_filter_insert_not_delete` is by @tchajed (original name: `map_filter_insert_not_strong`).These are some lemmas from Perennial about "filter" on maps. Most are by me; `map_filter_insert_not_delete` is by @tchajed (original name: `map_filter_insert_not_strong`).https://gitlab.mpi-sws.org/iris/stdpp/-/merge_requests/171Sketch docs for computation on [gmap], since they're a FAQ2020-07-02T15:14:03ZPaolo G. GiarrussoSketch docs for computation on [gmap], since they're a FAQTODO:
- [x] fix line breaks, when the rest is reviewed (it destructs diffs till then).TODO:
- [x] fix line breaks, when the rest is reviewed (it destructs diffs till then).https://gitlab.mpi-sws.org/iris/stdpp/-/merge_requests/170drop support for Coq 8.72020-07-02T07:03:43ZRalf Jungjung@mpi-sws.orgdrop support for Coq 8.7https://gitlab.mpi-sws.org/iris/stdpp/-/merge_requests/169Fix #70: add pattern variant of bind notation2020-07-15T12:43:20ZPaolo G. GiarrussoFix #70: add pattern variant of bind notationUse that in place of the old encoding:
https://gitlab.mpi-sws.org/iris/stdpp/-/issues/70#note_52817
Requires dropping support for Coq 8.7 (in a separate MR).Use that in place of the old encoding:
https://gitlab.mpi-sws.org/iris/stdpp/-/issues/70#note_52817
Requires dropping support for Coq 8.7 (in a separate MR).https://gitlab.mpi-sws.org/iris/stdpp/-/merge_requests/167Add solver `multiset_solver` for multisets2020-06-29T11:53:21ZRobbert KrebbersAdd solver `multiset_solver` for multisetsThe code contains some documentation how it works.
I added a number of tests, and used it to automate many existing lemmas in the `gmultiset` file.
Note that this required restructuring the file quite a bit, since I needed some bas...The code contains some documentation how it works.
I added a number of tests, and used it to automate many existing lemmas in the `gmultiset` file.
Note that this required restructuring the file quite a bit, since I needed some basic lemmas (now in section `basic_lemmas`) to define the tactic, and wanted to use the tactic subsequently to prove many of the existing lemmas (now in section `multiset_unfold`). None of the lemma statements changed, only many proofs are replaced by a mere call to `multiset_solver`.
/cc @msammlerhttps://gitlab.mpi-sws.org/iris/stdpp/-/merge_requests/166Avoid arbitrary terms in `auto using` to make std++ compliant with Coq #125122020-06-17T08:54:53ZRobbert KrebbersAvoid arbitrary terms in `auto using` to make std++ compliant with Coq #12512This MR provides an alternative to https://gitlab.mpi-sws.org/iris/stdpp/-/merge_requests/165, but avoids the `epose` horribleness. Instead, it just spells out some proofs, which IMHO makes things easier to maintain.This MR provides an alternative to https://gitlab.mpi-sws.org/iris/stdpp/-/merge_requests/165, but avoids the `epose` horribleness. Instead, it just spells out some proofs, which IMHO makes things easier to maintain.https://gitlab.mpi-sws.org/iris/stdpp/-/merge_requests/164Added sig_finite (and elem_of_list_fmap_inj, proj1_inj_pi)2020-06-18T19:17:26ZsarahzrfAdded sig_finite (and elem_of_list_fmap_inj, proj1_inj_pi)I've added an instance `sig_finite` along with a couple of minor things used to define/prove it. This is a `Finite` instance for `sig`s over `Finite` types whose predicates are decidable and proof irrelevant:
```coq
(* Not a direct excer...I've added an instance `sig_finite` along with a couple of minor things used to define/prove it. This is a `Finite` instance for `sig`s over `Finite` types whose predicates are decidable and proof irrelevant:
```coq
(* Not a direct excerpt. *)
Context `{Finite A} (P : A → Prop) `{∀ x, Decision (P x)} `{∀ x, ProofIrrel (P x)}.
Global Instance sig_finite : Finite (sig P).
```https://gitlab.mpi-sws.org/iris/stdpp/-/merge_requests/163Remove type scope from forall notation2020-05-27T22:12:37ZTej Chajedtchajed@gmail.comRemove type scope from forall notationFixes #67.Fixes #67.https://gitlab.mpi-sws.org/iris/stdpp/-/merge_requests/162Prove theorem about delete of gset_to_gmap2020-06-23T21:33:04ZTej Chajedtchajed@gmail.comProve theorem about delete of gset_to_gmapBasically the opposite of `gset_to_gmap_union_singleton`.
I was going to call this `gset_to_gmap_delete` but I decided to follow the convention from the other lemma (which isn't called `gset_to_gmap_insert`).Basically the opposite of `gset_to_gmap_union_singleton`.
I was going to call this `gset_to_gmap_delete` but I decided to follow the convention from the other lemma (which isn't called `gset_to_gmap_insert`).https://gitlab.mpi-sws.org/iris/stdpp/-/merge_requests/161rename Z2Nat_inj_div and Z2Nat_inj_mod2020-05-12T21:43:31ZMichael Sammlerrename Z2Nat_inj_div and Z2Nat_inj_modThis MR renames `Z2Nat_inj_div`, `Z2Nat_inj_mod`, `Nat2Z_inj_div` and `Nat2Z_inj_mod` to follow the naming conventions of `Z2Nat` and `Nat2Z`. See https://gitlab.mpi-sws.org/iris/stdpp/-/merge_requests/136#note_49866
Should I mention ir...This MR renames `Z2Nat_inj_div`, `Z2Nat_inj_mod`, `Nat2Z_inj_div` and `Nat2Z_inj_mod` to follow the naming conventions of `Z2Nat` and `Nat2Z`. See https://gitlab.mpi-sws.org/iris/stdpp/-/merge_requests/136#note_49866
Should I mention iris-users here already or only if the MR is merged?https://gitlab.mpi-sws.org/iris/stdpp/-/merge_requests/160Revert "Merge branch 'byte-countable' into 'master'"2020-05-12T17:33:24ZRobbert KrebbersRevert "Merge branch 'byte-countable' into 'master'"This reverts merge request !155 because it's incompatible with Coq ≤8.9.This reverts merge request !155 because it's incompatible with Coq ≤8.9.https://gitlab.mpi-sws.org/iris/stdpp/-/merge_requests/159alternative overlay for coq/coq#121622020-05-08T09:42:13ZOlivier Laurentalternative overlay for coq/coq#12162This is an alternative to !153 which follows the spirit of !156.
It is adapted to the last version of [coq/coq#12162](https://github.com/coq/coq/pull/12162) which takes into account the introduction of `Bool.lt`.This is an alternative to !153 which follows the spirit of !156.
It is adapted to the last version of [coq/coq#12162](https://github.com/coq/coq/pull/12162) which takes into account the introduction of `Bool.lt`.https://gitlab.mpi-sws.org/iris/stdpp/-/merge_requests/158add map_Forall_lookup2020-05-07T14:13:20ZRalf Jungjung@mpi-sws.orgadd map_Forall_lookupI was just searching for this lemma for at least 5 minutes until I realized that this is the definition of `map_Forall` -- usually our definitions are such that just `Print`ing stuff doesn't actually get me anywhere useful.
I think it w...I was just searching for this lemma for at least 5 minutes until I realized that this is the definition of `map_Forall` -- usually our definitions are such that just `Print`ing stuff doesn't actually get me anywhere useful.
I think it would be good for a lemma like this to show up in `Search` results.https://gitlab.mpi-sws.org/iris/stdpp/-/merge_requests/157tactics.v: Fix parsing precedence for `select` tactic2020-05-06T20:04:57ZPaolo G. Giarrussotactics.v: Fix parsing precedence for `select` tactichttps://gitlab.mpi-sws.org/iris/stdpp/-/merge_requests/155Add Countable instances for byte2020-05-12T17:53:49ZTej Chajedtchajed@gmail.comAdd Countable instances for byte