Skip to content

GitLab

  • Projects
  • Groups
  • Snippets
  • Help
    • Loading...
  • Help
    • Help
    • Support
    • Community forum
    • Submit feedback
    • Contribute to GitLab
  • Sign in / Register
S
stdpp
  • Project overview
    • Project overview
    • Details
    • Activity
    • Releases
  • Repository
    • Repository
    • Files
    • Commits
    • Branches
    • Tags
    • Contributors
    • Graph
    • Compare
  • Issues 52
    • Issues 52
    • List
    • Boards
    • Labels
    • Service Desk
    • Milestones
  • Merge Requests 1
    • Merge Requests 1
  • CI / CD
    • CI / CD
    • Pipelines
    • Jobs
    • Schedules
  • Operations
    • Operations
    • Incidents
    • Environments
  • Analytics
    • Analytics
    • CI / CD
    • Repository
    • Value Stream
  • Wiki
    • Wiki
  • Members
    • Members
  • Activity
  • Graph
  • Create a new issue
  • Jobs
  • Commits
  • Issue Boards
Collapse sidebar
  • Iris
  • stdpp
  • Issues
  • #59

Closed
Open
Opened Apr 01, 2020 by Gregory Malecha@gmalechaContributor

Associativity of insert notation is awkard: `<[ k := v ]> m`

Because the notation parses only as <[ k := v ]> as a function, you can't chain them together without parens.

<[ k := v ]> <[ k' := v' ]> m

doesn't parse, you need parentheses. How much of a problem would it be to extend the notation to <[ k := v ]> m that is right associative? Are there a lot of users that use this as partial application?

Edited Apr 01, 2020 by Gregory Malecha
Assignee
Assign to
None
Milestone
None
Assign milestone
Time tracking
None
Due date
None
Reference: iris/stdpp#59