diff --git a/tests/proper.v b/tests/proper.v index 58f68d1ed8db58c08540b0ad345c469ae66d2441..2d7b8119e54c37a6b34c0b81ed43b7ea18774c34 100644 --- a/tests/proper.v +++ b/tests/proper.v @@ -21,6 +21,18 @@ Section tests. baz (bar (f 0)) (f 2). Goal Proper (pointwise_relation nat (≡) ==> (≡)) test3. Proof. solve_proper. Qed. + + (* We mirror [discrete_fun] from Iris to have an equivalence on a function + space. *) + Definition discrete_fun {A} (B : A → Type) `{!∀ x, Equiv (B x)} := ∀ x : A, B x. + Local Instance discrete_fun_equiv {A} {B : A → Type} `{!∀ x, Equiv (B x)} : + Equiv (discrete_fun B) := + λ f g, ∀ x, f x ≡ g x. + Notation "A -d> B" := + (@discrete_fun A (λ _, B) _) (at level 99, B at level 200, right associativity). + Definition test4 x (f : A -d> A) := f x. + Goal ∀ x, Proper ((≡) ==> (≡)) (test4 x). + Proof. solve_proper. Qed. End tests. Global Instance from_option_proper_test1 `{Equiv A} {B} (R : relation B) (f : A → B) : diff --git a/theories/tactics.v b/theories/tactics.v index 78dbd9788085203f1174404ee0883e7442e05bdb..62f8ff4aa02303fd6e777d0bb34cacc697eb2c20 100644 --- a/theories/tactics.v +++ b/theories/tactics.v @@ -406,12 +406,12 @@ Ltac f_equiv := | |- ?R (?f _ _ _ _) _ => simple apply (_ : Proper (_ ==> _ ==> _ ==> _ ==> R) f) | |- ?R (?f _ _ _ _ _) _ => simple apply (_ : Proper (_ ==> _ ==> _ ==> _ ==> _ ==> R) f) (* In case the function symbol differs, but the arguments are the same, - maybe we have a pointwise_relation in our context. *) + maybe we have a relation about those functions in our context. *) (* TODO: If only some of the arguments are the same, we could also - query for "pointwise_relation"'s. But that leads to a combinatorial + query for such relations. But that leads to a combinatorial explosion about which arguments are and which are not the same. *) - | H : pointwise_relation _ ?R ?f ?g |- ?R (?f ?x) (?g ?x) => simple apply H - | H : pointwise_relation _ (pointwise_relation _ ?R) ?f ?g |- ?R (?f ?x ?y) (?g ?x ?y) => simple apply H + | H : _ ?f ?g |- ?R (?f ?x) (?g ?x) => solve [simple apply H] + | H : _ ?f ?g |- ?R (?f ?x ?y) (?g ?x ?y) => solve [simple apply H] end; try simple apply reflexivity. Tactic Notation "f_equiv" "/=" := csimpl in *; f_equiv.