base.v 47.3 KB
Newer Older
1
(* Copyright (c) 2012-2017, Coq-std++ developers. *)
2 3 4 5 6
(* This file is distributed under the terms of the BSD license. *)
(** This file collects type class interfaces, notations, and general theorems
that are used throughout the whole development. Most importantly it contains
abstract interfaces for ordered structures, collections, and various other data
structures. *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
7
Global Generalizable All Variables.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
8
Global Set Asymmetric Patterns.
9
Global Unset Transparent Obligations.
10
From Coq Require Export Morphisms RelationClasses List Bool Utf8 Setoid.
11
Set Default Proof Using "Type".
12 13
Export ListNotations.
From Coq.Program Require Export Basics Syntax.
14 15 16

(* Tweak program: don't let it automatically simplify obligations and hide
them from the results of the [Search] commands. *)
17
Obligation Tactic := idtac.
18
Add Search Blacklist "_obligation_".
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
19

20
(** Sealing off definitions *)
Ralf Jung's avatar
Ralf Jung committed
21 22 23 24
Section seal.
  Local Set Primitive Projections.
  Record seal {A} (f : A) := { unseal : A; seal_eq : unseal = f }.
End seal.
Ralf Jung's avatar
Ralf Jung committed
25 26
Arguments unseal {_ _} _ : assert.
Arguments seal_eq {_ _} _ : assert.
27

28 29 30 31 32 33 34
(** Typeclass opaque definitions *)
(* The constant [tc_opaque] is used to make definitions opaque for just type
class search. Note that [simpl] is set up to always unfold [tc_opaque]. *)
Definition tc_opaque {A} (x : A) : A := x.
Typeclasses Opaque tc_opaque.
Arguments tc_opaque {_} _ /.

35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50
(* Below we define type class versions of the common logical operators. It is
important to note that we duplicate the definitions, and do not declare the
existing logical operators as type classes. That is, we do not say:

  Existing Class or.
  Existing Class and.

If we could define the existing logical operators as classes, there is no way
of disambiguating whether a premise of a lemma should be solved by type class
resolution or not.

These classes are useful for two purposes: writing complicated type class
premises in a more concise way, and for efficiency. For example, using the [Or]
class, instead of defining two instances [P → Q1 → R] and [P → Q2 → R] we could
have one instance [P → Or Q1 Q2 → R]. When we declare the instance that way, we
avoid the need to derive [P] twice. *)
51
Inductive TCOr (P1 P2 : Prop) : Prop :=
52 53 54 55 56
  | TCOr_l : P1  TCOr P1 P2
  | TCOr_r : P2  TCOr P1 P2.
Existing Class TCOr.
Existing Instance TCOr_l | 9.
Existing Instance TCOr_r | 10.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
57

58
Inductive TCAnd (P1 P2 : Prop) : Prop := TCAnd_intro : P1  P2  TCAnd P1 P2.
59 60
Existing Class TCAnd.
Existing Instance TCAnd_intro.
61

62 63 64
Inductive TCTrue : Prop := TCTrue_intro : TCTrue.
Existing Class TCTrue.
Existing Instance TCTrue_intro.
65

66 67 68 69 70 71 72
Inductive TCForall {A} (P : A  Prop) : list A  Prop :=
  | TCForall_nil : TCForall P []
  | TCForall_cons x xs : P x  TCForall P xs  TCForall P (x :: xs).
Existing Class TCForall.
Existing Instance TCForall_nil.
Existing Instance TCForall_cons.

73 74 75 76
(** Throughout this development we use [C_scope] for all general purpose
notations that do not belong to a more specific scope. *)
Delimit Scope C_scope with C.
Global Open Scope C_scope.
77

78
(** Change [True] and [False] into notations in order to enable overloading.
79 80
We will use this to give [True] and [False] a different interpretation for
embedded logics. *)
81 82
Notation "'True'" := True : type_scope.
Notation "'False'" := False : type_scope.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
83 84


85
(** * Equality *)
86
(** Introduce some Haskell style like notations. *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
87 88 89 90 91 92 93
Notation "(=)" := eq (only parsing) : C_scope.
Notation "( x =)" := (eq x) (only parsing) : C_scope.
Notation "(= x )" := (λ y, eq y x) (only parsing) : C_scope.
Notation "(≠)" := (λ x y, x  y) (only parsing) : C_scope.
Notation "( x ≠)" := (λ y, x  y) (only parsing) : C_scope.
Notation "(≠ x )" := (λ y, y  x) (only parsing) : C_scope.

94
Hint Extern 0 (_ = _) => reflexivity.
95
Hint Extern 100 (_  _) => discriminate.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
96

97 98 99 100 101 102 103
Instance: @PreOrder A (=).
Proof. split; repeat intro; congruence. Qed.

(** ** Setoid equality *)
(** We define an operational type class for setoid equality. This is based on
(Spitters/van der Weegen, 2011). *)
Class Equiv A := equiv: relation A.
104 105 106
(* No Hint Mode set because of Coq bug #5735
Hint Mode Equiv ! : typeclass_instances. *)

107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120
Infix "≡" := equiv (at level 70, no associativity) : C_scope.
Notation "(≡)" := equiv (only parsing) : C_scope.
Notation "( X ≡)" := (equiv X) (only parsing) : C_scope.
Notation "(≡ X )" := (λ Y, Y  X) (only parsing) : C_scope.
Notation "(≢)" := (λ X Y, ¬X  Y) (only parsing) : C_scope.
Notation "X ≢ Y":= (¬X  Y) (at level 70, no associativity) : C_scope.
Notation "( X ≢)" := (λ Y, X  Y) (only parsing) : C_scope.
Notation "(≢ X )" := (λ Y, Y  X) (only parsing) : C_scope.

(** The type class [LeibnizEquiv] collects setoid equalities that coincide
with Leibniz equality. We provide the tactic [fold_leibniz] to transform such
setoid equalities into Leibniz equalities, and [unfold_leibniz] for the
reverse. *)
Class LeibnizEquiv A `{Equiv A} := leibniz_equiv x y : x  y  x = y.
121 122
Hint Mode LeibnizEquiv ! - : typeclass_instances.

123 124 125
Lemma leibniz_equiv_iff `{LeibnizEquiv A, !Reflexive (@equiv A _)} (x y : A) :
  x  y  x = y.
Proof. split. apply leibniz_equiv. intros ->; reflexivity. Qed.
126

127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159
Ltac fold_leibniz := repeat
  match goal with
  | H : context [ @equiv ?A _ _ _ ] |- _ =>
    setoid_rewrite (leibniz_equiv_iff (A:=A)) in H
  | |- context [ @equiv ?A _ _ _ ] =>
    setoid_rewrite (leibniz_equiv_iff (A:=A))
  end.
Ltac unfold_leibniz := repeat
  match goal with
  | H : context [ @eq ?A _ _ ] |- _ =>
    setoid_rewrite <-(leibniz_equiv_iff (A:=A)) in H
  | |- context [ @eq ?A _ _ ] =>
    setoid_rewrite <-(leibniz_equiv_iff (A:=A))
  end.

Definition equivL {A} : Equiv A := (=).

(** A [Params f n] instance forces the setoid rewriting mechanism not to
rewrite in the first [n] arguments of the function [f]. We will declare such
instances for all operational type classes in this development. *)
Instance: Params (@equiv) 2.

(** The following instance forces [setoid_replace] to use setoid equality
(for types that have an [Equiv] instance) rather than the standard Leibniz
equality. *)
Instance equiv_default_relation `{Equiv A} : DefaultRelation () | 3.
Hint Extern 0 (_  _) => reflexivity.
Hint Extern 0 (_  _) => symmetry; assumption.


(** * Type classes *)
(** ** Decidable propositions *)
(** This type class by (Spitters/van der Weegen, 2011) collects decidable
160
propositions. *)
161
Class Decision (P : Prop) := decide : {P} + {¬P}.
162
Hint Mode Decision ! : typeclass_instances.
163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183
Arguments decide _ {_} : simpl never, assert.

(** Although [RelDecision R] is just [∀ x y, Decision (R x y)], we make this
an explicit class instead of a notation for two reasons:

- It allows us to control [Hint Mode] more precisely. In particular, if it were
  defined as a notation, the above [Hint Mode] for [Decision] would not prevent
  diverging instance search when looking for [RelDecision (@eq ?A)], which would
  result in it looking for [Decision (@eq ?A x y)], i.e. an instance where the
  head position of [Decision] is not en evar.
- We use it to avoid inefficient computation due to eager evaluation of
  propositions by [vm_compute]. This inefficiency arises for example if
  [(x = y) := (f x = f y)]. Since [decide (x = y)] evaluates to
  [decide (f x = f y)], this would then lead to evaluation of [f x] and [f y].
  Using the [RelDecision], the [f] is hidden under a lambda, which prevents
  unnecessary evaluation. *)
Class RelDecision {A B} (R : A  B  Prop) :=
  decide_rel x y :> Decision (R x y).
Hint Mode RelDecision ! ! ! : typeclass_instances.
Arguments decide_rel {_ _} _ {_} _ _ : simpl never, assert.
Notation EqDecision A := (RelDecision (@eq A)).
184 185 186 187

(** ** Inhabited types *)
(** This type class collects types that are inhabited. *)
Class Inhabited (A : Type) : Type := populate { inhabitant : A }.
188
Hint Mode Inhabited ! : typeclass_instances.
189
Arguments populate {_} _ : assert.
190 191 192 193 194 195

(** ** Proof irrelevant types *)
(** This type class collects types that are proof irrelevant. That means, all
elements of the type are equal. We use this notion only used for propositions,
but by universe polymorphism we can generalize it. *)
Class ProofIrrel (A : Type) : Prop := proof_irrel (x y : A) : x = y.
196
Hint Mode ProofIrrel ! : typeclass_instances.
197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232

(** ** Common properties *)
(** These operational type classes allow us to refer to common mathematical
properties in a generic way. For example, for injectivity of [(k ++)] it
allows us to write [inj (k ++)] instead of [app_inv_head k]. *)
Class Inj {A B} (R : relation A) (S : relation B) (f : A  B) : Prop :=
  inj x y : S (f x) (f y)  R x y.
Class Inj2 {A B C} (R1 : relation A) (R2 : relation B)
    (S : relation C) (f : A  B  C) : Prop :=
  inj2 x1 x2 y1 y2 : S (f x1 x2) (f y1 y2)  R1 x1 y1  R2 x2 y2.
Class Cancel {A B} (S : relation B) (f : A  B) (g : B  A) : Prop :=
  cancel :  x, S (f (g x)) x.
Class Surj {A B} (R : relation B) (f : A  B) :=
  surj y :  x, R (f x) y.
Class IdemP {A} (R : relation A) (f : A  A  A) : Prop :=
  idemp x : R (f x x) x.
Class Comm {A B} (R : relation A) (f : B  B  A) : Prop :=
  comm x y : R (f x y) (f y x).
Class LeftId {A} (R : relation A) (i : A) (f : A  A  A) : Prop :=
  left_id x : R (f i x) x.
Class RightId {A} (R : relation A) (i : A) (f : A  A  A) : Prop :=
  right_id x : R (f x i) x.
Class Assoc {A} (R : relation A) (f : A  A  A) : Prop :=
  assoc x y z : R (f x (f y z)) (f (f x y) z).
Class LeftAbsorb {A} (R : relation A) (i : A) (f : A  A  A) : Prop :=
  left_absorb x : R (f i x) i.
Class RightAbsorb {A} (R : relation A) (i : A) (f : A  A  A) : Prop :=
  right_absorb x : R (f x i) i.
Class AntiSymm {A} (R S : relation A) : Prop :=
  anti_symm x y : S x y  S y x  R x y.
Class Total {A} (R : relation A) := total x y : R x y  R y x.
Class Trichotomy {A} (R : relation A) :=
  trichotomy x y : R x y  x = y  R y x.
Class TrichotomyT {A} (R : relation A) :=
  trichotomyT x y : {R x y} + {x = y} + {R y x}.

233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248
Arguments irreflexivity {_} _ {_} _ _ : assert.
Arguments inj {_ _ _ _} _ {_} _ _ _ : assert.
Arguments inj2 {_ _ _ _ _ _} _ {_} _ _ _ _ _: assert.
Arguments cancel {_ _ _} _ _ {_} _ : assert.
Arguments surj {_ _ _} _ {_} _ : assert.
Arguments idemp {_ _} _ {_} _ : assert.
Arguments comm {_ _ _} _ {_} _ _ : assert.
Arguments left_id {_ _} _ _ {_} _ : assert.
Arguments right_id {_ _} _ _ {_} _ : assert.
Arguments assoc {_ _} _ {_} _ _ _ : assert.
Arguments left_absorb {_ _} _ _ {_} _ : assert.
Arguments right_absorb {_ _} _ _ {_} _ : assert.
Arguments anti_symm {_ _} _ {_} _ _ _ _ : assert.
Arguments total {_} _ {_} _ _ : assert.
Arguments trichotomy {_} _ {_} _ _ : assert.
Arguments trichotomyT {_} _ {_} _ _ : assert.
249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337

Lemma not_symmetry `{R : relation A, !Symmetric R} x y : ¬R x y  ¬R y x.
Proof. intuition. Qed.
Lemma symmetry_iff `(R : relation A) `{!Symmetric R} x y : R x y  R y x.
Proof. intuition. Qed.

Lemma not_inj `{Inj A B R R' f} x y : ¬R x y  ¬R' (f x) (f y).
Proof. intuition. Qed.
Lemma not_inj2_1 `{Inj2 A B C R R' R'' f} x1 x2 y1 y2 :
  ¬R x1 x2  ¬R'' (f x1 y1) (f x2 y2).
Proof. intros HR HR''. destruct (inj2 f x1 y1 x2 y2); auto. Qed.
Lemma not_inj2_2 `{Inj2 A B C R R' R'' f} x1 x2 y1 y2 :
  ¬R' y1 y2  ¬R'' (f x1 y1) (f x2 y2).
Proof. intros HR' HR''. destruct (inj2 f x1 y1 x2 y2); auto. Qed.

Lemma inj_iff {A B} {R : relation A} {S : relation B} (f : A  B)
  `{!Inj R S f} `{!Proper (R ==> S) f} x y : S (f x) (f y)  R x y.
Proof. firstorder. Qed.
Instance inj2_inj_1 `{Inj2 A B C R1 R2 R3 f} y : Inj R1 R3 (λ x, f x y).
Proof. repeat intro; edestruct (inj2 f); eauto. Qed.
Instance inj2_inj_2 `{Inj2 A B C R1 R2 R3 f} x : Inj R2 R3 (f x).
Proof. repeat intro; edestruct (inj2 f); eauto. Qed.

Lemma cancel_inj `{Cancel A B R1 f g, !Equivalence R1, !Proper (R2 ==> R1) f} :
  Inj R1 R2 g.
Proof.
  intros x y E. rewrite <-(cancel f g x), <-(cancel f g y), E. reflexivity.
Qed.
Lemma cancel_surj `{Cancel A B R1 f g} : Surj R1 f.
Proof. intros y. exists (g y). auto. Qed.

(** The following lemmas are specific versions of the projections of the above
type classes for Leibniz equality. These lemmas allow us to enforce Coq not to
use the setoid rewriting mechanism. *)
Lemma idemp_L {A} f `{!@IdemP A (=) f} x : f x x = x.
Proof. auto. Qed.
Lemma comm_L {A B} f `{!@Comm A B (=) f} x y : f x y = f y x.
Proof. auto. Qed.
Lemma left_id_L {A} i f `{!@LeftId A (=) i f} x : f i x = x.
Proof. auto. Qed.
Lemma right_id_L {A} i f `{!@RightId A (=) i f} x : f x i = x.
Proof. auto. Qed.
Lemma assoc_L {A} f `{!@Assoc A (=) f} x y z : f x (f y z) = f (f x y) z.
Proof. auto. Qed.
Lemma left_absorb_L {A} i f `{!@LeftAbsorb A (=) i f} x : f i x = i.
Proof. auto. Qed.
Lemma right_absorb_L {A} i f `{!@RightAbsorb A (=) i f} x : f x i = i.
Proof. auto. Qed.

(** ** Generic orders *)
(** The classes [PreOrder], [PartialOrder], and [TotalOrder] use an arbitrary
relation [R] instead of [⊆] to support multiple orders on the same type. *)
Definition strict {A} (R : relation A) : relation A := λ X Y, R X Y  ¬R Y X.
Instance: Params (@strict) 2.
Class PartialOrder {A} (R : relation A) : Prop := {
  partial_order_pre :> PreOrder R;
  partial_order_anti_symm :> AntiSymm (=) R
}.
Class TotalOrder {A} (R : relation A) : Prop := {
  total_order_partial :> PartialOrder R;
  total_order_trichotomy :> Trichotomy (strict R)
}.

(** * Logic *)
Notation "(∧)" := and (only parsing) : C_scope.
Notation "( A ∧)" := (and A) (only parsing) : C_scope.
Notation "(∧ B )" := (λ A, A  B) (only parsing) : C_scope.

Notation "(∨)" := or (only parsing) : C_scope.
Notation "( A ∨)" := (or A) (only parsing) : C_scope.
Notation "(∨ B )" := (λ A, A  B) (only parsing) : C_scope.

Notation "(↔)" := iff (only parsing) : C_scope.
Notation "( A ↔)" := (iff A) (only parsing) : C_scope.
Notation "(↔ B )" := (λ A, A  B) (only parsing) : C_scope.

Hint Extern 0 (_  _) => reflexivity.
Hint Extern 0 (_  _) => symmetry; assumption.

Lemma or_l P Q : ¬Q  P  Q  P.
Proof. tauto. Qed.
Lemma or_r P Q : ¬P  P  Q  Q.
Proof. tauto. Qed.
Lemma and_wlog_l (P Q : Prop) : (Q  P)  Q  (P  Q).
Proof. tauto. Qed.
Lemma and_wlog_r (P Q : Prop) : P  (P  Q)  (P  Q).
Proof. tauto. Qed.
Lemma impl_transitive (P Q R : Prop) : (P  Q)  (Q  R)  (P  R).
Proof. tauto. Qed.
338 339 340 341 342 343
Lemma forall_proper {A} (P Q : A  Prop) :
  ( x, P x  Q x)  ( x, P x)  ( x, Q x).
Proof. firstorder. Qed.
Lemma exist_proper {A} (P Q : A  Prop) :
  ( x, P x  Q x)  ( x, P x)  ( x, Q x).
Proof. firstorder. Qed.
344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386

Instance: Comm () (@eq A).
Proof. red; intuition. Qed.
Instance: Comm () (λ x y, @eq A y x).
Proof. red; intuition. Qed.
Instance: Comm () ().
Proof. red; intuition. Qed.
Instance: Comm () ().
Proof. red; intuition. Qed.
Instance: Assoc () ().
Proof. red; intuition. Qed.
Instance: IdemP () ().
Proof. red; intuition. Qed.
Instance: Comm () ().
Proof. red; intuition. Qed.
Instance: Assoc () ().
Proof. red; intuition. Qed.
Instance: IdemP () ().
Proof. red; intuition. Qed.
Instance: LeftId () True ().
Proof. red; intuition. Qed.
Instance: RightId () True ().
Proof. red; intuition. Qed.
Instance: LeftAbsorb () False ().
Proof. red; intuition. Qed.
Instance: RightAbsorb () False ().
Proof. red; intuition. Qed.
Instance: LeftId () False ().
Proof. red; intuition. Qed.
Instance: RightId () False ().
Proof. red; intuition. Qed.
Instance: LeftAbsorb () True ().
Proof. red; intuition. Qed.
Instance: RightAbsorb () True ().
Proof. red; intuition. Qed.
Instance: LeftId () True impl.
Proof. unfold impl. red; intuition. Qed.
Instance: RightAbsorb () True impl.
Proof. unfold impl. red; intuition. Qed.


(** * Common data types *)
(** ** Functions *)
387 388 389 390
Notation "(→)" := (λ A B, A  B) (only parsing) : C_scope.
Notation "( A →)" := (λ B, A  B) (only parsing) : C_scope.
Notation "(→ B )" := (λ A, A  B) (only parsing) : C_scope.

391
Notation "t $ r" := (t r)
392
  (at level 65, right associativity, only parsing) : C_scope.
393 394 395
Notation "($)" := (λ f x, f x) (only parsing) : C_scope.
Notation "($ x )" := (λ f, f x) (only parsing) : C_scope.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
396 397 398 399
Infix "∘" := compose : C_scope.
Notation "(∘)" := compose (only parsing) : C_scope.
Notation "( f ∘)" := (compose f) (only parsing) : C_scope.
Notation "(∘ f )" := (λ g, compose g f) (only parsing) : C_scope.
400

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
401 402 403
Instance impl_inhabited {A} `{Inhabited B} : Inhabited (A  B) :=
  populate (λ _, inhabitant).

404 405
(** Ensure that [simpl] unfolds [id], [compose], and [flip] when fully
applied. *)
406 407 408 409
Arguments id _ _ / : assert.
Arguments compose _ _ _ _ _ _ / : assert.
Arguments flip _ _ _ _ _ _ / : assert.
Arguments const _ _ _ _ / : assert.
410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466
Typeclasses Transparent id compose flip const.

Definition fun_map {A A' B B'} (f: A'  A) (g: B  B') (h : A  B) : A'  B' :=
  g  h  f.

Instance const_proper `{R1 : relation A, R2 : relation B} (x : B) :
  Reflexive R2  Proper (R1 ==> R2) (λ _, x).
Proof. intros ? y1 y2; reflexivity. Qed.

Instance id_inj {A} : Inj (=) (=) (@id A).
Proof. intros ??; auto. Qed.
Instance compose_inj {A B C} R1 R2 R3 (f : A  B) (g : B  C) :
  Inj R1 R2 f  Inj R2 R3 g  Inj R1 R3 (g  f).
Proof. red; intuition. Qed.

Instance id_surj {A} : Surj (=) (@id A).
Proof. intros y; exists y; reflexivity. Qed.
Instance compose_surj {A B C} R (f : A  B) (g : B  C) :
  Surj (=) f  Surj R g  Surj R (g  f).
Proof.
  intros ?? x. unfold compose. destruct (surj g x) as [y ?].
  destruct (surj f y) as [z ?]. exists z. congruence.
Qed.

Instance id_comm {A B} (x : B) : Comm (=) (λ _ _ : A, x).
Proof. intros ?; reflexivity. Qed.
Instance id_assoc {A} (x : A) : Assoc (=) (λ _ _ : A, x).
Proof. intros ???; reflexivity. Qed.
Instance const1_assoc {A} : Assoc (=) (λ x _ : A, x).
Proof. intros ???; reflexivity. Qed.
Instance const2_assoc {A} : Assoc (=) (λ _ x : A, x).
Proof. intros ???; reflexivity. Qed.
Instance const1_idemp {A} : IdemP (=) (λ x _ : A, x).
Proof. intros ?; reflexivity. Qed.
Instance const2_idemp {A} : IdemP (=) (λ _ x : A, x).
Proof. intros ?; reflexivity. Qed.

(** ** Lists *)
Instance list_inhabited {A} : Inhabited (list A) := populate [].

Definition zip_with {A B C} (f : A  B  C) : list A  list B  list C :=
  fix go l1 l2 :=
  match l1, l2 with x1 :: l1, x2 :: l2 => f x1 x2 :: go l1 l2 | _ , _ => [] end.
Notation zip := (zip_with pair).

(** ** Booleans *)
(** The following coercion allows us to use Booleans as propositions. *)
Coercion Is_true : bool >-> Sortclass.
Hint Unfold Is_true.
Hint Immediate Is_true_eq_left.
Hint Resolve orb_prop_intro andb_prop_intro.
Notation "(&&)" := andb (only parsing).
Notation "(||)" := orb (only parsing).
Infix "&&*" := (zip_with (&&)) (at level 40).
Infix "||*" := (zip_with (||)) (at level 50).

Instance bool_inhabated : Inhabited bool := populate true.
467

468 469 470 471 472
Definition bool_le (β1 β2 : bool) : Prop := negb β1 || β2.
Infix "=.>" := bool_le (at level 70).
Infix "=.>*" := (Forall2 bool_le) (at level 70).
Instance: PartialOrder bool_le.
Proof. repeat split; repeat intros [|]; compute; tauto. Qed.
473

474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481
Lemma andb_True b1 b2 : b1 && b2  b1  b2.
Proof. destruct b1, b2; simpl; tauto. Qed.
Lemma orb_True b1 b2 : b1 || b2  b1  b2.
Proof. destruct b1, b2; simpl; tauto. Qed.
Lemma negb_True b : negb b  ¬b.
Proof. destruct b; simpl; tauto. Qed.
Lemma Is_true_false (b : bool) : b = false  ¬b.
Proof. now intros -> ?. Qed.
482

483 484 485 486
(** ** Unit *)
Instance unit_equiv : Equiv unit := λ _ _, True.
Instance unit_equivalence : Equivalence (@equiv unit _).
Proof. repeat split. Qed.
487 488
Instance unit_leibniz : LeibnizEquiv unit.
Proof. intros [] []; reflexivity. Qed.
489
Instance unit_inhabited: Inhabited unit := populate ().
490

491
(** ** Products *)
492 493 494 495 496 497
Notation "( x ,)" := (pair x) (only parsing) : C_scope.
Notation "(, y )" := (λ x, (x,y)) (only parsing) : C_scope.

Notation "p .1" := (fst p) (at level 10, format "p .1").
Notation "p .2" := (snd p) (at level 10, format "p .2").

498
Instance: Params (@pair) 2.
499 500
Instance: Params (@fst) 2.
Instance: Params (@snd) 2.
501

502 503 504 505 506 507 508
Notation curry := prod_curry.
Notation uncurry := prod_uncurry.
Definition curry3 {A B C D} (f : A  B  C  D) (p : A * B * C) : D :=
  let '(a,b,c) := p in f a b c.
Definition curry4 {A B C D E} (f : A  B  C  D  E) (p : A * B * C * D) : E :=
  let '(a,b,c,d) := p in f a b c d.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
509 510 511 512 513
Definition uncurry3 {A B C D} (f : A * B * C  D) (a : A) (b : B) (c : C) : D :=
  f (a, b, c).
Definition uncurry4 {A B C D E} (f : A * B * C * D  E)
  (a : A) (b : B) (c : C) (d : D) : E := f (a, b, c, d).

514 515
Definition prod_map {A A' B B'} (f: A  A') (g: B  B') (p : A * B) : A' * B' :=
  (f (p.1), g (p.2)).
516
Arguments prod_map {_ _ _ _} _ _ !_ / : assert.
517

518 519
Definition prod_zip {A A' A'' B B' B''} (f : A  A'  A'') (g : B  B'  B'')
    (p : A * B) (q : A' * B') : A'' * B'' := (f (p.1) (q.1), g (p.2) (q.2)).
520
Arguments prod_zip {_ _ _ _ _ _} _ _ !_ !_ / : assert.
521

522 523 524
Instance prod_inhabited {A B} (iA : Inhabited A)
    (iB : Inhabited B) : Inhabited (A * B) :=
  match iA, iB with populate x, populate y => populate (x,y) end.
525

526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533
Instance pair_inj : Inj2 (=) (=) (=) (@pair A B).
Proof. injection 1; auto. Qed.
Instance prod_map_inj {A A' B B'} (f : A  A') (g : B  B') :
  Inj (=) (=) f  Inj (=) (=) g  Inj (=) (=) (prod_map f g).
Proof.
  intros ?? [??] [??] ?; simpl in *; f_equal;
    [apply (inj f)|apply (inj g)]; congruence.
Qed.
534

535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550
Definition prod_relation {A B} (R1 : relation A) (R2 : relation B) :
  relation (A * B) := λ x y, R1 (x.1) (y.1)  R2 (x.2) (y.2).
Section prod_relation.
  Context `{R1 : relation A, R2 : relation B}.
  Global Instance prod_relation_refl :
    Reflexive R1  Reflexive R2  Reflexive (prod_relation R1 R2).
  Proof. firstorder eauto. Qed.
  Global Instance prod_relation_sym :
    Symmetric R1  Symmetric R2  Symmetric (prod_relation R1 R2).
  Proof. firstorder eauto. Qed.
  Global Instance prod_relation_trans :
    Transitive R1  Transitive R2  Transitive (prod_relation R1 R2).
  Proof. firstorder eauto. Qed.
  Global Instance prod_relation_equiv :
    Equivalence R1  Equivalence R2  Equivalence (prod_relation R1 R2).
  Proof. split; apply _. Qed.
551

552 553
  Global Instance pair_proper' : Proper (R1 ==> R2 ==> prod_relation R1 R2) pair.
  Proof. firstorder eauto. Qed.
554 555
  Global Instance pair_inj' : Inj2 R1 R2 (prod_relation R1 R2) pair.
  Proof. inversion_clear 1; eauto. Qed.
556 557 558 559 560
  Global Instance fst_proper' : Proper (prod_relation R1 R2 ==> R1) fst.
  Proof. firstorder eauto. Qed.
  Global Instance snd_proper' : Proper (prod_relation R1 R2 ==> R2) snd.
  Proof. firstorder eauto. Qed.
End prod_relation.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
561

562 563
Instance prod_equiv `{Equiv A,Equiv B} : Equiv (A * B) := prod_relation () ().
Instance pair_proper `{Equiv A, Equiv B} :
564 565
  Proper (() ==> () ==> ()) (@pair A B) := _.
Instance pair_equiv_inj `{Equiv A, Equiv B} : Inj2 () () () (@pair A B) := _.
566 567 568
Instance fst_proper `{Equiv A, Equiv B} : Proper (() ==> ()) (@fst A B) := _.
Instance snd_proper `{Equiv A, Equiv B} : Proper (() ==> ()) (@snd A B) := _.
Typeclasses Opaque prod_equiv.
569

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
570 571
Instance prod_leibniz `{LeibnizEquiv A, LeibnizEquiv B} : LeibnizEquiv (A * B).
Proof. intros [??] [??] [??]; f_equal; apply leibniz_equiv; auto. Qed.
572

573
(** ** Sums *)
574 575
Definition sum_map {A A' B B'} (f: A  A') (g: B  B') (xy : A + B) : A' + B' :=
  match xy with inl x => inl (f x) | inr y => inr (g y) end.
576
Arguments sum_map {_ _ _ _} _ _ !_ / : assert.
577

578
Instance sum_inhabited_l {A B} (iA : Inhabited A) : Inhabited (A + B) :=
579
  match iA with populate x => populate (inl x) end.
580
Instance sum_inhabited_r {A B} (iB : Inhabited A) : Inhabited (A + B) :=
581
  match iB with populate y => populate (inl y) end.
582

583 584 585 586
Instance inl_inj : Inj (=) (=) (@inl A B).
Proof. injection 1; auto. Qed.
Instance inr_inj : Inj (=) (=) (@inr A B).
Proof. injection 1; auto. Qed.
587

588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614
Instance sum_map_inj {A A' B B'} (f : A  A') (g : B  B') :
  Inj (=) (=) f  Inj (=) (=) g  Inj (=) (=) (sum_map f g).
Proof. intros ?? [?|?] [?|?] [=]; f_equal; apply (inj _); auto. Qed.

Inductive sum_relation {A B}
     (R1 : relation A) (R2 : relation B) : relation (A + B) :=
  | inl_related x1 x2 : R1 x1 x2  sum_relation R1 R2 (inl x1) (inl x2)
  | inr_related y1 y2 : R2 y1 y2  sum_relation R1 R2 (inr y1) (inr y2).

Section sum_relation.
  Context `{R1 : relation A, R2 : relation B}.
  Global Instance sum_relation_refl :
    Reflexive R1  Reflexive R2  Reflexive (sum_relation R1 R2).
  Proof. intros ?? [?|?]; constructor; reflexivity. Qed.
  Global Instance sum_relation_sym :
    Symmetric R1  Symmetric R2  Symmetric (sum_relation R1 R2).
  Proof. destruct 3; constructor; eauto. Qed.
  Global Instance sum_relation_trans :
    Transitive R1  Transitive R2  Transitive (sum_relation R1 R2).
  Proof. destruct 3; inversion_clear 1; constructor; eauto. Qed.
  Global Instance sum_relation_equiv :
    Equivalence R1  Equivalence R2  Equivalence (sum_relation R1 R2).
  Proof. split; apply _. Qed.
  Global Instance inl_proper' : Proper (R1 ==> sum_relation R1 R2) inl.
  Proof. constructor; auto. Qed.
  Global Instance inr_proper' : Proper (R2 ==> sum_relation R1 R2) inr.
  Proof. constructor; auto. Qed.
615 616 617 618
  Global Instance inl_inj' : Inj R1 (sum_relation R1 R2) inl.
  Proof. inversion_clear 1; auto. Qed.
  Global Instance inr_inj' : Inj R2 (sum_relation R1 R2) inr.
  Proof. inversion_clear 1; auto. Qed.
619 620 621 622 623
End sum_relation.

Instance sum_equiv `{Equiv A, Equiv B} : Equiv (A + B) := sum_relation () ().
Instance inl_proper `{Equiv A, Equiv B} : Proper (() ==> ()) (@inl A B) := _.
Instance inr_proper `{Equiv A, Equiv B} : Proper (() ==> ()) (@inr A B) := _.
624 625
Instance inl_equiv_inj `{Equiv A, Equiv B} : Inj () () (@inl A B) := _.
Instance inr_equiv_inj `{Equiv A, Equiv B} : Inj () () (@inr A B) := _.
626 627
Typeclasses Opaque sum_equiv.

628 629
(** ** Option *)
Instance option_inhabited {A} : Inhabited (option A) := populate None.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
630

631
(** ** Sigma types *)
632 633 634
Arguments existT {_ _} _ _ : assert.
Arguments projT1 {_ _} _ : assert.
Arguments projT2 {_ _} _ : assert.
635

636 637 638
Arguments exist {_} _ _ _ : assert.
Arguments proj1_sig {_ _} _ : assert.
Arguments proj2_sig {_ _} _ : assert.
639 640
Notation "x ↾ p" := (exist _ x p) (at level 20) : C_scope.
Notation "` x" := (proj1_sig x) (at level 10, format "` x") : C_scope.
641

642 643 644
Lemma proj1_sig_inj {A} (P : A  Prop) x (Px : P x) y (Py : P y) :
  xPx = yPy  x = y.
Proof. injection 1; trivial. Qed.
645

646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655
Section sig_map.
  Context `{P : A  Prop} `{Q : B  Prop} (f : A  B) (Hf :  x, P x  Q (f x)).
  Definition sig_map (x : sig P) : sig Q := f (`x)  Hf _ (proj2_sig x).
  Global Instance sig_map_inj:
    ( x, ProofIrrel (P x))  Inj (=) (=) f  Inj (=) (=) sig_map.
  Proof.
    intros ?? [x Hx] [y Hy]. injection 1. intros Hxy.
    apply (inj f) in Hxy; subst. rewrite (proof_irrel _ Hy). auto.
  Qed.
End sig_map.
656
Arguments sig_map _ _ _ _ _ _ !_ / : assert.
657

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
658

659
(** * Operations on collections *)
660
(** We define operational type classes for the traditional operations and
661
relations on collections: the empty collection [∅], the union [(∪)],
662 663
intersection [(∩)], and difference [(∖)], the singleton [{[_]}], the subset
[(⊆)] and element of [(∈)] relation, and disjointess [(⊥)]. *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
664
Class Empty A := empty: A.
665
Hint Mode Empty ! : typeclass_instances.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
666 667
Notation "∅" := empty : C_scope.

668 669
Instance empty_inhabited `(Empty A) : Inhabited A := populate .

670
Class Top A := top : A.
671
Hint Mode Top ! : typeclass_instances.
672 673
Notation "⊤" := top : C_scope.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
674
Class Union A := union: A  A  A.
675
Hint Mode Union ! : typeclass_instances.
676
Instance: Params (@union) 2.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
677 678 679 680
Infix "∪" := union (at level 50, left associativity) : C_scope.
Notation "(∪)" := union (only parsing) : C_scope.
Notation "( x ∪)" := (union x) (only parsing) : C_scope.
Notation "(∪ x )" := (λ y, union y x) (only parsing) : C_scope.
681 682 683 684 685 686
Infix "∪*" := (zip_with ()) (at level 50, left associativity) : C_scope.
Notation "(∪*)" := (zip_with ()) (only parsing) : C_scope.
Infix "∪**" := (zip_with (zip_with ()))
  (at level 50, left associativity) : C_scope.
Infix "∪*∪**" := (zip_with (prod_zip () (*)))
  (at level 50, left associativity) : C_scope.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
687

688
Definition union_list `{Empty A} `{Union A} : list A  A := fold_right () .
689
Arguments union_list _ _ _ !_ / : assert.
690 691
Notation "⋃ l" := (union_list l) (at level 20, format "⋃  l") : C_scope.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
692
Class Intersection A := intersection: A  A  A.
693
Hint Mode Intersection ! : typeclass_instances.
694
Instance: Params (@intersection) 2.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
695 696 697 698 699 700
Infix "∩" := intersection (at level 40) : C_scope.
Notation "(∩)" := intersection (only parsing) : C_scope.
Notation "( x ∩)" := (intersection x) (only parsing) : C_scope.
Notation "(∩ x )" := (λ y, intersection y x) (only parsing) : C_scope.

Class Difference A := difference: A  A  A.
701
Hint Mode Difference ! : typeclass_instances.
702
Instance: Params (@difference) 2.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
703
Infix "∖" := difference (at level 40, left associativity) : C_scope.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
704 705 706
Notation "(∖)" := difference (only parsing) : C_scope.
Notation "( x ∖)" := (difference x) (only parsing) : C_scope.
Notation "(∖ x )" := (λ y, difference y x) (only parsing) : C_scope.
707 708 709 710 711 712
Infix "∖*" := (zip_with ()) (at level 40, left associativity) : C_scope.
Notation "(∖*)" := (zip_with ()) (only parsing) : C_scope.
Infix "∖**" := (zip_with (zip_with ()))
  (at level 40, left associativity) : C_scope.
Infix "∖*∖**" := (zip_with (prod_zip () (*)))
  (at level 50, left associativity) : C_scope.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
713

714
Class Singleton A B := singleton: A  B.
715
Hint Mode Singleton - ! : typeclass_instances.
716
Instance: Params (@singleton) 3.
717
Notation "{[ x ]}" := (singleton x) (at level 1) : C_scope.
718
Notation "{[ x ; y ; .. ; z ]}" :=
719 720 721 722 723 724
  (union .. (union (singleton x) (singleton y)) .. (singleton z))
  (at level 1) : C_scope.
Notation "{[ x , y ]}" := (singleton (x,y))
  (at level 1, y at next level) : C_scope.
Notation "{[ x , y , z ]}" := (singleton (x,y,z))
  (at level 1, y at next level, z at next level) : C_scope.
725

726
Class SubsetEq A := subseteq: relation A.
727
Hint Mode SubsetEq ! : typeclass_instances.
728
Instance: Params (@subseteq) 2.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
729 730
Infix "⊆" := subseteq (at level 70) : C_scope.
Notation "(⊆)" := subseteq (only parsing) : C_scope.
731 732
Notation "( X ⊆)" := (subseteq X) (only parsing) : C_scope.
Notation "(⊆ X )" := (λ Y, Y  X) (only parsing) : C_scope.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
733 734
Notation "X ⊈ Y" := (¬X  Y) (at level 70) : C_scope.
Notation "(⊈)" := (λ X Y, X  Y) (only parsing) : C_scope.
735 736
Notation "( X ⊈)" := (λ Y, X  Y) (only parsing) : C_scope.
Notation "(⊈ X )" := (λ Y, Y  X) (only parsing) : C_scope.
737 738 739 740 741 742 743
Infix "⊆*" := (Forall2 ()) (at level 70) : C_scope.
Notation "(⊆*)" := (Forall2 ()) (only parsing) : C_scope.
Infix "⊆**" := (Forall2 (*)) (at level 70) : C_scope.
Infix "⊆1*" := (Forall2 (λ p q, p.1  q.1)) (at level 70) : C_scope.
Infix "⊆2*" := (Forall2 (λ p q, p.2  q.2)) (at level 70) : C_scope.
Infix "⊆1**" := (Forall2 (λ p q, p.1 * q.1)) (at level 70) : C_scope.
Infix "⊆2**" := (Forall2 (λ p q, p.2 * q.2)) (at level 70) : C_scope.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
744

745
Hint Extern 0 (_  _) => reflexivity.
746 747 748 749 750
Hint Extern 0 (_ * _) => reflexivity.
Hint Extern 0 (_ ** _) => reflexivity.

Infix "⊂" := (strict ()) (at level 70) : C_scope.
Notation "(⊂)" := (strict ()) (only parsing) : C_scope.
751 752 753
Notation "( X ⊂)" := (strict () X) (only parsing) : C_scope.
Notation "(⊂ X )" := (λ Y, Y  X) (only parsing) : C_scope.
Notation "X ⊄ Y" := (¬X  Y) (at level 70) : C_scope.
754
Notation "(⊄)" := (λ X Y, X  Y) (only parsing) : C_scope.
755 756
Notation "( X ⊄)" := (λ Y, X  Y) (only parsing) : C_scope.
Notation "(⊄ X )" := (λ Y, Y  X) (only parsing) : C_scope.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
757

758 759 760 761 762
Notation "X ⊆ Y ⊆ Z" := (X  Y  Y  Z) (at level 70, Y at next level) : C_scope.
Notation "X ⊆ Y ⊂ Z" := (X  Y  Y  Z) (at level 70, Y at next level) : C_scope.
Notation "X ⊂ Y ⊆ Z" := (X  Y  Y  Z) (at level 70, Y at next level) : C_scope.
Notation "X ⊂ Y ⊂ Z" := (X  Y  Y  Z) (at level 70, Y at next level) : C_scope.

763 764 765 766
(** The class [Lexico A] is used for the lexicographic order on [A]. This order
is used to create finite maps, finite sets, etc, and is typically different from
the order [(⊆)]. *)
Class Lexico A := lexico: relation A.
767
Hint Mode Lexico ! : typeclass_instances.
768

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
769
Class ElemOf A B := elem_of: A  B  Prop.
770
Hint Mode ElemOf - ! : typeclass_instances.
771
Instance: Params (@elem_of) 3.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780
Infix "∈" := elem_of (at level 70) : C_scope.
Notation "(∈)" := elem_of (only parsing) : C_scope.
Notation "( x ∈)" := (elem_of x) (only parsing) : C_scope.
Notation "(∈ X )" := (λ x, elem_of x X) (only parsing) : C_scope.
Notation "x ∉ X" := (¬x  X) (at level 80) : C_scope.
Notation "(∉)" := (λ x X, x  X) (only parsing) : C_scope.
Notation "( x ∉)" := (λ X, x  X) (only parsing) : C_scope.
Notation "(∉ X )" := (λ x, x  X) (only parsing) : C_scope.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
781
Class Disjoint A := disjoint : A  A  Prop.
782
Hint Mode Disjoint ! : typeclass_instances.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
783 784 785
Instance: Params (@disjoint) 2.
Infix "⊥" := disjoint (at level 70) : C_scope.
Notation "(⊥)" := disjoint (only parsing) : C_scope.
786
Notation "( X ⊥.)" := (disjoint X) (only parsing) : C_scope.
787
Notation "(.⊥ X )" := (λ Y, Y  X) (only parsing) : C_scope.
788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798
Infix "⊥*" := (Forall2 ()) (at level 70) : C_scope.
Notation "(⊥*)" := (Forall2 ()) (only parsing) : C_scope.
Infix "⊥**" := (Forall2 (*)) (at level 70) : C_scope.
Infix "⊥1*" := (Forall2 (λ p q, p.1  q.1)) (at level 70) : C_scope.
Infix "⊥2*" := (Forall2 (λ p q, p.2  q.2)) (at level 70) : C_scope.
Infix "⊥1**" := (Forall2 (λ p q, p.1 * q.1)) (at level 70) : C_scope.
Infix "⊥2**" := (Forall2 (λ p q, p.2 * q.2)) (at level 70) : C_scope.
Hint Extern 0 (_  _) => symmetry; eassumption.
Hint Extern 0 (_ * _) => symmetry; eassumption.

Class DisjointE E A := disjointE : E  A  A  Prop.
799
Hint Mode DisjointE - ! : typeclass_instances.
800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813
Instance: Params (@disjointE) 4.
Notation "X ⊥{ Γ } Y" := (disjointE Γ X Y)
  (at level 70, format "X  ⊥{ Γ }  Y") : C_scope.
Notation "(⊥{ Γ } )" := (disjointE Γ) (only parsing, Γ at level 1) : C_scope.
Notation "Xs ⊥{ Γ }* Ys" := (Forall2 ({Γ}) Xs Ys)
  (at level 70, format "Xs  ⊥{ Γ }*  Ys") : C_scope.
Notation "(⊥{ Γ }* )" := (Forall2 ({Γ}))
  (only parsing, Γ at level 1) : C_scope.
Notation "X ⊥{ Γ1 , Γ2 , .. , Γ3 } Y" := (disjoint (pair .. (Γ1, Γ2) .. Γ3) X Y)
  (at level 70, format "X  ⊥{ Γ1 , Γ2 , .. , Γ3 }  Y") : C_scope.
Notation "Xs ⊥{ Γ1 , Γ2 , .. , Γ3 }* Ys" :=
  (Forall2 (disjoint (pair .. (Γ1, Γ2) .. Γ3)) Xs Ys)
  (at level 70, format "Xs  ⊥{ Γ1 ,  Γ2 , .. , Γ3 }*  Ys") : C_scope.
Hint Extern 0 (_ {_} _) => symmetry; eassumption.
814 815

Class DisjointList A := disjoint_list : list A  Prop.
816
Hint Mode DisjointList ! : typeclass_instances.
817
Instance: Params (@disjoint_list) 2.
818
Notation "⊥ Xs" := (disjoint_list Xs) (at level 20, format "⊥  Xs") : C_scope.
819

820 821
Section disjoint_list.
  Context `{Disjoint A, Union A, Empty A}.
822 823
  Implicit Types X : A.

824 825 826 827
  Inductive disjoint_list_default : DisjointList A :=
    | disjoint_nil_2 :  (@nil A)
    | disjoint_cons_2 (X : A) (Xs : list A) : X   Xs   Xs   (X :: Xs).
  Global Existing Instance disjoint_list_default.
828

829
  Lemma disjoint_list_nil  :  @nil A  True.
830 831 832
  Proof. split; constructor. Qed.
  Lemma disjoint_list_cons X Xs :  (X :: Xs)  X   Xs   Xs.
  Proof. split. inversion_clear 1; auto. intros [??]. constructor; auto. Qed.
833
End disjoint_list.
834 835

Class Filter A B := filter:  (P : A  Prop) `{ x, Decision (P x)}, B  B.
836
Hint Mode Filter - ! : typeclass_instances.
837

838
Class UpClose A B := up_close : A  B.
839
Hint Mode UpClose - ! : typeclass_instances.
840
Notation "↑ x" := (up_close x) (at level 20, format "↑ x").
841 842

(** * Monadic operations *)
843
(** We define operational type classes for the monadic operations bind, join 
844 845 846
and fmap. We use these type classes merely for convenient overloading of
notations and do not formalize any theory on monads (we do not even define a
class with the monad laws). *)
847
Class MRet (M : Type  Type) := mret:  {A}, A  M A.
848
Arguments mret {_ _ _} _ : assert.
849
Instance: Params (@mret) 3.
850
Class MBind (M : Type  Type) := mbind :  {A B}, (A  M B)  M A  M B.
851
Arguments mbind {_ _ _ _} _ !_ / : assert.
852
Instance: Params (@mbind) 4.
853
Class MJoin (M : Type  Type) := mjoin:  {A}, M (M A)  M A.
854
Arguments mjoin {_ _ _} !_ / : assert.
855
Instance: Params (@mjoin) 3.
856
Class FMap (M : Type  Type) := fmap :  {A B}, (A  B)  M A  M B.
857
Arguments fmap {_ _ _ _} _ !_ / : assert.
858
Instance: Params (@fmap) 4.
859
Class OMap (M : Type  Type) := omap:  {A B}, (A  option B)  M A  M B.
860
Arguments omap {_ _ _ _} _ !_ / : assert.
861
Instance: Params (@omap) 4.
862

863 864 865 866 867 868
Notation "m ≫= f" := (mbind f m) (at level 60, right associativity) : C_scope.
Notation "( m ≫=)" := (λ f, mbind f m) (only parsing) : C_scope.
Notation "(≫= f )" := (mbind f) (only parsing) : C_scope.
Notation "(≫=)" := (λ m f, mbind f m) (only parsing) : C_scope.

Notation "x ← y ; z" := (y = (λ x : _, z))
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
869
  (at level 65, only parsing, right associativity) : C_scope.
870
Infix "<$>" := fmap (at level 60, right associativity) : C_scope.
871
Notation "' ( x1 , x2 ) ← y ; z" :=
872
  (y = (λ x : _, let ' (x1, x2) := x in z))
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
873
  (at level 65, only parsing, right associativity) : C_scope.
874
Notation "' ( x1 , x2 , x3 ) ← y ; z" :=
875
  (y = (λ x : _, let ' (x1,x2,x3) := x in z))
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
876
  (at level 65, only parsing, right associativity) : C_scope.
877
Notation "' ( x1 , x2 , x3  , x4 ) ← y ; z" :=
878
  (y = (λ x : _, let ' (x1,x2,x3,x4) := x in z))
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
879
  (at level 65, only parsing, right associativity) : C_scope.
880 881
Notation "' ( x1 , x2 , x3  , x4 , x5 ) ← y ; z" :=
  (y = (λ x : _, let ' (x1,x2,x3,x4,x5) := x in z))
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
882
  (at level 65, only parsing, right associativity) : C_scope.