base.v 59.2 KB
Newer Older
1 2
(** This file collects type class interfaces, notations, and general theorems
that are used throughout the whole development. Most importantly it contains
3
abstract interfaces for ordered structures, sets, and various other data
4
structures. *)
5

6 7 8 9 10 11
(** The order of this [Require Export] is important: The definition of [length]
in [List] should shadow the definition of [length] in [String]. We also need
to export [Datatypes] because [List] contains a [parsing only] notation for
[length], not the actual definition of [length], which is in [Datatypes]. *)
From Coq Require Export String Datatypes List.
From Coq Require Export Morphisms RelationClasses Bool Utf8 Setoid.
12
From Coq Require Import Permutation.
13
Set Default Proof Using "Type".
14 15
Export ListNotations.
From Coq.Program Require Export Basics Syntax.
16

Ralf Jung's avatar
Ralf Jung committed
17 18
(** * Enable implicit generalization. *)
(** This option enables implicit generalization in arguments of the form
19 20 21 22 23 24
   `{...} (i.e., anonymous arguments).  Unfortunately, it also enables
   implicit generalization in `Instance`.  We think that the fact taht both
   behaviors are coupled together is a [bug in
   Coq](https://github.com/coq/coq/issues/6030). *)
Global Generalizable All Variables.

25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39
(** * Tweak program *)
(** 1. Since we only use Program to solve logical side-conditions, they should
always be made Opaque, otherwise we end up with performance problems due to
Coq blindly unfolding them.

Note that in most cases we use [Next Obligation. (* ... *) Qed.], for which
this option does not matter. However, sometimes we write things like
[Solve Obligations with naive_solver (* ... *)], and then the obligations
should surely be opaque. *)
Global Unset Transparent Obligations.

(** 2. Do not let Program automatically simplify obligations. The default
obligation tactic is [Tactics.program_simpl], which, among other things,
introduces all variables and gives them fresh names. As such, it becomes
impossible to refer to hypotheses in a robust way. *)
40
Obligation Tactic := idtac.
41 42

(** 3. Hide obligations from the results of the [Search] commands. *)
43
Add Search Blacklist "_obligation_".
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
44

45
(** * Sealing off definitions *)
Ralf Jung's avatar
Ralf Jung committed
46 47 48 49
Section seal.
  Local Set Primitive Projections.
  Record seal {A} (f : A) := { unseal : A; seal_eq : unseal = f }.
End seal.
Ralf Jung's avatar
Ralf Jung committed
50 51
Arguments unseal {_ _} _ : assert.
Arguments seal_eq {_ _} _ : assert.
52

53
(** * Non-backtracking type classes *)
54
(** The type class [TCNoBackTrack P] can be used to establish [P] without ever
55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65
backtracking on the instance of [P] that has been found. Backtracking may
normally happen when [P] contains evars that could be instanciated in different
ways depending on which instance is picked, and type class search somewhere else
depends on this evar.

The proper way of handling this would be by setting Coq's option
`Typeclasses Unique Instances`. However, this option seems to be broken, see Coq
issue #6714.

See https://gitlab.mpi-sws.org/FP/iris-coq/merge_requests/112 for a rationale
of this type class. *)
66 67
Class TCNoBackTrack (P : Prop) := { tc_no_backtrack : P }.
Hint Extern 0 (TCNoBackTrack _) => constructor; apply _ : typeclass_instances.
68

69 70
(* A conditional at the type class level. Note that [TCIf P Q R] is not the same
as [TCOr (TCAnd P Q) R]: the latter will backtrack to [R] if it fails to
Paolo G. Giarrusso's avatar
Paolo G. Giarrusso committed
71
establish [Q], i.e. does not have the behavior of a conditional. Furthermore,
72
note that [TCOr (TCAnd P Q) (TCAnd (TCNot P) R)] would not work; we generally
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
73
would not be able to prove the negation of [P]. *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
74
Inductive TCIf (P Q R : Prop) : Prop :=
75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82
  | TCIf_true : P  Q  TCIf P Q R
  | TCIf_false : R  TCIf P Q R.
Existing Class TCIf.

Hint Extern 0 (TCIf _ _ _) =>
  first [apply TCIf_true; [apply _|]
        |apply TCIf_false] : typeclass_instances.

83
(** * Typeclass opaque definitions *)
Ralf Jung's avatar
Ralf Jung committed
84
(** The constant [tc_opaque] is used to make definitions opaque for just type
85 86 87 88 89
class search. Note that [simpl] is set up to always unfold [tc_opaque]. *)
Definition tc_opaque {A} (x : A) : A := x.
Typeclasses Opaque tc_opaque.
Arguments tc_opaque {_} _ /.

Ralf Jung's avatar
Ralf Jung committed
90
(** Below we define type class versions of the common logical operators. It is
91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105
important to note that we duplicate the definitions, and do not declare the
existing logical operators as type classes. That is, we do not say:

  Existing Class or.
  Existing Class and.

If we could define the existing logical operators as classes, there is no way
of disambiguating whether a premise of a lemma should be solved by type class
resolution or not.

These classes are useful for two purposes: writing complicated type class
premises in a more concise way, and for efficiency. For example, using the [Or]
class, instead of defining two instances [P → Q1 → R] and [P → Q2 → R] we could
have one instance [P → Or Q1 Q2 → R]. When we declare the instance that way, we
avoid the need to derive [P] twice. *)
106
Inductive TCOr (P1 P2 : Prop) : Prop :=
107 108 109 110 111
  | TCOr_l : P1  TCOr P1 P2
  | TCOr_r : P2  TCOr P1 P2.
Existing Class TCOr.
Existing Instance TCOr_l | 9.
Existing Instance TCOr_r | 10.
112
Hint Mode TCOr ! ! : typeclass_instances.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
113

114
Inductive TCAnd (P1 P2 : Prop) : Prop := TCAnd_intro : P1  P2  TCAnd P1 P2.
115 116
Existing Class TCAnd.
Existing Instance TCAnd_intro.
117
Hint Mode TCAnd ! ! : typeclass_instances.
118

119 120 121
Inductive TCTrue : Prop := TCTrue_intro : TCTrue.
Existing Class TCTrue.
Existing Instance TCTrue_intro.
122

123 124 125 126 127 128
Inductive TCForall {A} (P : A  Prop) : list A  Prop :=
  | TCForall_nil : TCForall P []
  | TCForall_cons x xs : P x  TCForall P xs  TCForall P (x :: xs).
Existing Class TCForall.
Existing Instance TCForall_nil.
Existing Instance TCForall_cons.
129
Hint Mode TCForall ! ! ! : typeclass_instances.
130

131 132 133
(** The class [TCForall2 P l k] is commonly used to transform an input list [l]
into an output list [k], or the converse. Therefore there are two modes, either
[l] input and [k] output, or [k] input and [l] input. *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
134 135 136 137 138 139 140
Inductive TCForall2 {A B} (P : A  B  Prop) : list A  list B  Prop :=
  | TCForall2_nil : TCForall2 P [] []
  | TCForall2_cons x y xs ys :
     P x y  TCForall2 P xs ys  TCForall2 P (x :: xs) (y :: ys).
Existing Class TCForall2.
Existing Instance TCForall2_nil.
Existing Instance TCForall2_cons.
141 142
Hint Mode TCForall2 ! ! ! ! - : typeclass_instances.
Hint Mode TCForall2 ! ! ! - ! : typeclass_instances.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
143

144 145 146 147 148 149
Inductive TCElemOf {A} (x : A) : list A  Prop :=
  | TCElemOf_here xs : TCElemOf x (x :: xs)
  | TCElemOf_further y xs : TCElemOf x xs  TCElemOf x (y :: xs).
Existing Class TCElemOf.
Existing Instance TCElemOf_here.
Existing Instance TCElemOf_further.
150
Hint Mode TCElemOf ! ! ! : typeclass_instances.
151

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
152 153 154 155
(** We declare both arguments [x] and [y] of [TCEq x y] as outputs, which means
[TCEq] can also be used to unify evars. This is harmless: since the only
instance of [TCEq] is [TCEq_refl] below, it can never cause loops. See
https://gitlab.mpi-sws.org/iris/iris/merge_requests/391 for a use case. *)
156 157 158
Inductive TCEq {A} (x : A) : A  Prop := TCEq_refl : TCEq x x.
Existing Class TCEq.
Existing Instance TCEq_refl.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
159
Hint Mode TCEq ! - - : typeclass_instances.
160

Michael Sammler's avatar
Michael Sammler committed
161 162 163
Lemma TCEq_eq {A} (x1 x2 : A) : TCEq x1 x2  x1 = x2.
Proof. split; destruct 1; reflexivity. Qed.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
164 165 166 167
Inductive TCDiag {A} (C : A  Prop) : A  A  Prop :=
  | TCDiag_diag x : C x  TCDiag C x x.
Existing Class TCDiag.
Existing Instance TCDiag_diag.
168 169
Hint Mode TCDiag ! ! ! - : typeclass_instances.
Hint Mode TCDiag ! ! - ! : typeclass_instances.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
170

171 172 173 174 175 176
(** Given a proposition [P] that is a type class, [tc_to_bool P] will return
[true] iff there is an instance of [P]. It is often useful in Ltac programming,
where one can do [lazymatch tc_to_bool P with true => .. | false => .. end]. *)
Definition tc_to_bool (P : Prop)
  {p : bool} `{TCIf P (TCEq p true) (TCEq p false)} : bool := p.

177
(** Throughout this development we use [stdpp_scope] for all general purpose
178
notations that do not belong to a more specific scope. *)
179 180
Delimit Scope stdpp_scope with stdpp.
Global Open Scope stdpp_scope.
181

182
(** Change [True] and [False] into notations in order to enable overloading.
183 184
We will use this to give [True] and [False] a different interpretation for
embedded logics. *)
185 186
Notation "'True'" := True (format "True") : type_scope.
Notation "'False'" := False (format "False") : type_scope.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
187 188


189
(** * Equality *)
190
(** Introduce some Haskell style like notations. *)
191
Notation "(=)" := eq (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
192 193
Notation "( x =.)" := (eq x) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(.= x )" := (λ y, eq y x) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
194
Notation "(≠)" := (λ x y, x  y) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
195 196
Notation "( x ≠.)" := (λ y, x  y) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(.≠ x )" := (λ y, y  x) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
197

198 199 200 201
Infix "=@{ A }" := (@eq A)
  (at level 70, only parsing, no associativity) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(=@{ A } )" := (@eq A) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(≠@{ A } )" := (λ X Y, ¬X =@{A} Y) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
202 203
Notation "X ≠@{ A } Y":= (¬X =@{ A } Y)
  (at level 70, only parsing, no associativity) : stdpp_scope.
204

Tej Chajed's avatar
Tej Chajed committed
205 206
Hint Extern 0 (_ = _) => reflexivity : core.
Hint Extern 100 (_  _) => discriminate : core.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
207

208
Instance:  A, PreOrder (=@{A}).
209 210 211
Proof. split; repeat intro; congruence. Qed.

(** ** Setoid equality *)
Ralf Jung's avatar
Ralf Jung committed
212 213 214
(** We define an operational type class for setoid equality, i.e., the
"canonical" equivalence for a type. The typeclass is tied to the \equiv
symbol. This is based on (Spitters/van der Weegen, 2011). *)
215
Class Equiv A := equiv: relation A.
216 217 218
(* No Hint Mode set because of Coq bug #5735
Hint Mode Equiv ! : typeclass_instances. *)

219
Infix "≡" := equiv (at level 70, no associativity) : stdpp_scope.
220 221 222
Infix "≡@{ A }" := (@equiv A _)
  (at level 70, only parsing, no associativity) : stdpp_scope.

223
Notation "(≡)" := equiv (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
224 225
Notation "( X ≡.)" := (equiv X) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(.≡ X )" := (λ Y, Y  X) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
226 227
Notation "(≢)" := (λ X Y, ¬X  Y) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "X ≢ Y":= (¬X  Y) (at level 70, no associativity) : stdpp_scope.
228 229
Notation "( X ≢.)" := (λ Y, X  Y) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(.≢ X )" := (λ Y, Y  X) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
230

231 232
Notation "(≡@{ A } )" := (@equiv A _) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(≢@{ A } )" := (λ X Y, ¬X @{A} Y) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
233 234
Notation "X ≢@{ A } Y":= (¬X @{ A } Y)
  (at level 70, only parsing, no associativity) : stdpp_scope.
235

236 237 238 239 240
(** The type class [LeibnizEquiv] collects setoid equalities that coincide
with Leibniz equality. We provide the tactic [fold_leibniz] to transform such
setoid equalities into Leibniz equalities, and [unfold_leibniz] for the
reverse. *)
Class LeibnizEquiv A `{Equiv A} := leibniz_equiv x y : x  y  x = y.
241 242
Hint Mode LeibnizEquiv ! - : typeclass_instances.

243
Lemma leibniz_equiv_iff `{LeibnizEquiv A, !Reflexive (@{A})} (x y : A) :
244 245
  x  y  x = y.
Proof. split. apply leibniz_equiv. intros ->; reflexivity. Qed.
246

247 248
Ltac fold_leibniz := repeat
  match goal with
249
  | H : context [ _ @{?A} _ ] |- _ =>
250
    setoid_rewrite (leibniz_equiv_iff (A:=A)) in H
251
  | |- context [ _ @{?A} _ ] =>
252 253 254 255
    setoid_rewrite (leibniz_equiv_iff (A:=A))
  end.
Ltac unfold_leibniz := repeat
  match goal with
256
  | H : context [ _ =@{?A} _ ] |- _ =>
257
    setoid_rewrite <-(leibniz_equiv_iff (A:=A)) in H
258
  | |- context [ _ =@{?A} _ ] =>
259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266
    setoid_rewrite <-(leibniz_equiv_iff (A:=A))
  end.

Definition equivL {A} : Equiv A := (=).

(** A [Params f n] instance forces the setoid rewriting mechanism not to
rewrite in the first [n] arguments of the function [f]. We will declare such
instances for all operational type classes in this development. *)
267
Instance: Params (@equiv) 2 := {}.
268 269 270 271

(** The following instance forces [setoid_replace] to use setoid equality
(for types that have an [Equiv] instance) rather than the standard Leibniz
equality. *)
272
Instance equiv_default_relation `{Equiv A} : DefaultRelation () | 3 := {}.
Tej Chajed's avatar
Tej Chajed committed
273 274
Hint Extern 0 (_  _) => reflexivity : core.
Hint Extern 0 (_  _) => symmetry; assumption : core.
275 276 277 278 279


(** * Type classes *)
(** ** Decidable propositions *)
(** This type class by (Spitters/van der Weegen, 2011) collects decidable
280
propositions. *)
281
Class Decision (P : Prop) := decide : {P} + {¬P}.
282
Hint Mode Decision ! : typeclass_instances.
283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302
Arguments decide _ {_} : simpl never, assert.

(** Although [RelDecision R] is just [∀ x y, Decision (R x y)], we make this
an explicit class instead of a notation for two reasons:

- It allows us to control [Hint Mode] more precisely. In particular, if it were
  defined as a notation, the above [Hint Mode] for [Decision] would not prevent
  diverging instance search when looking for [RelDecision (@eq ?A)], which would
  result in it looking for [Decision (@eq ?A x y)], i.e. an instance where the
  head position of [Decision] is not en evar.
- We use it to avoid inefficient computation due to eager evaluation of
  propositions by [vm_compute]. This inefficiency arises for example if
  [(x = y) := (f x = f y)]. Since [decide (x = y)] evaluates to
  [decide (f x = f y)], this would then lead to evaluation of [f x] and [f y].
  Using the [RelDecision], the [f] is hidden under a lambda, which prevents
  unnecessary evaluation. *)
Class RelDecision {A B} (R : A  B  Prop) :=
  decide_rel x y :> Decision (R x y).
Hint Mode RelDecision ! ! ! : typeclass_instances.
Arguments decide_rel {_ _} _ {_} _ _ : simpl never, assert.
303
Notation EqDecision A := (RelDecision (=@{A})).
304 305 306 307

(** ** Inhabited types *)
(** This type class collects types that are inhabited. *)
Class Inhabited (A : Type) : Type := populate { inhabitant : A }.
308
Hint Mode Inhabited ! : typeclass_instances.
309
Arguments populate {_} _ : assert.
310 311 312 313 314 315

(** ** Proof irrelevant types *)
(** This type class collects types that are proof irrelevant. That means, all
elements of the type are equal. We use this notion only used for propositions,
but by universe polymorphism we can generalize it. *)
Class ProofIrrel (A : Type) : Prop := proof_irrel (x y : A) : x = y.
316
Hint Mode ProofIrrel ! : typeclass_instances.
317 318 319

(** ** Common properties *)
(** These operational type classes allow us to refer to common mathematical
320 321
properties in a generic way. For example, for injectivity of [(k ++.)] it
allows us to write [inj (k ++.)] instead of [app_inv_head k]. *)
322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351
Class Inj {A B} (R : relation A) (S : relation B) (f : A  B) : Prop :=
  inj x y : S (f x) (f y)  R x y.
Class Inj2 {A B C} (R1 : relation A) (R2 : relation B)
    (S : relation C) (f : A  B  C) : Prop :=
  inj2 x1 x2 y1 y2 : S (f x1 x2) (f y1 y2)  R1 x1 y1  R2 x2 y2.
Class Cancel {A B} (S : relation B) (f : A  B) (g : B  A) : Prop :=
  cancel :  x, S (f (g x)) x.
Class Surj {A B} (R : relation B) (f : A  B) :=
  surj y :  x, R (f x) y.
Class IdemP {A} (R : relation A) (f : A  A  A) : Prop :=
  idemp x : R (f x x) x.
Class Comm {A B} (R : relation A) (f : B  B  A) : Prop :=
  comm x y : R (f x y) (f y x).
Class LeftId {A} (R : relation A) (i : A) (f : A  A  A) : Prop :=
  left_id x : R (f i x) x.
Class RightId {A} (R : relation A) (i : A) (f : A  A  A) : Prop :=
  right_id x : R (f x i) x.
Class Assoc {A} (R : relation A) (f : A  A  A) : Prop :=
  assoc x y z : R (f x (f y z)) (f (f x y) z).
Class LeftAbsorb {A} (R : relation A) (i : A) (f : A  A  A) : Prop :=
  left_absorb x : R (f i x) i.
Class RightAbsorb {A} (R : relation A) (i : A) (f : A  A  A) : Prop :=
  right_absorb x : R (f x i) i.
Class AntiSymm {A} (R S : relation A) : Prop :=
  anti_symm x y : S x y  S y x  R x y.
Class Total {A} (R : relation A) := total x y : R x y  R y x.
Class Trichotomy {A} (R : relation A) :=
  trichotomy x y : R x y  x = y  R y x.
Class TrichotomyT {A} (R : relation A) :=
  trichotomyT x y : {R x y} + {x = y} + {R y x}.
352 353 354 355 356

Notation Involutive R f := (Cancel R f f).
Lemma involutive {A} {R : relation A} (f : A  A) `{Involutive R f} x :
  R (f (f x)) x.
Proof. auto. Qed.
357

358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373
Arguments irreflexivity {_} _ {_} _ _ : assert.
Arguments inj {_ _ _ _} _ {_} _ _ _ : assert.
Arguments inj2 {_ _ _ _ _ _} _ {_} _ _ _ _ _: assert.
Arguments cancel {_ _ _} _ _ {_} _ : assert.
Arguments surj {_ _ _} _ {_} _ : assert.
Arguments idemp {_ _} _ {_} _ : assert.
Arguments comm {_ _ _} _ {_} _ _ : assert.
Arguments left_id {_ _} _ _ {_} _ : assert.
Arguments right_id {_ _} _ _ {_} _ : assert.
Arguments assoc {_ _} _ {_} _ _ _ : assert.
Arguments left_absorb {_ _} _ _ {_} _ : assert.
Arguments right_absorb {_ _} _ _ {_} _ : assert.
Arguments anti_symm {_ _} _ {_} _ _ _ _ : assert.
Arguments total {_} _ {_} _ _ : assert.
Arguments trichotomy {_} _ {_} _ _ : assert.
Arguments trichotomyT {_} _ {_} _ _ : assert.
374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426

Lemma not_symmetry `{R : relation A, !Symmetric R} x y : ¬R x y  ¬R y x.
Proof. intuition. Qed.
Lemma symmetry_iff `(R : relation A) `{!Symmetric R} x y : R x y  R y x.
Proof. intuition. Qed.

Lemma not_inj `{Inj A B R R' f} x y : ¬R x y  ¬R' (f x) (f y).
Proof. intuition. Qed.
Lemma not_inj2_1 `{Inj2 A B C R R' R'' f} x1 x2 y1 y2 :
  ¬R x1 x2  ¬R'' (f x1 y1) (f x2 y2).
Proof. intros HR HR''. destruct (inj2 f x1 y1 x2 y2); auto. Qed.
Lemma not_inj2_2 `{Inj2 A B C R R' R'' f} x1 x2 y1 y2 :
  ¬R' y1 y2  ¬R'' (f x1 y1) (f x2 y2).
Proof. intros HR' HR''. destruct (inj2 f x1 y1 x2 y2); auto. Qed.

Lemma inj_iff {A B} {R : relation A} {S : relation B} (f : A  B)
  `{!Inj R S f} `{!Proper (R ==> S) f} x y : S (f x) (f y)  R x y.
Proof. firstorder. Qed.
Instance inj2_inj_1 `{Inj2 A B C R1 R2 R3 f} y : Inj R1 R3 (λ x, f x y).
Proof. repeat intro; edestruct (inj2 f); eauto. Qed.
Instance inj2_inj_2 `{Inj2 A B C R1 R2 R3 f} x : Inj R2 R3 (f x).
Proof. repeat intro; edestruct (inj2 f); eauto. Qed.

Lemma cancel_inj `{Cancel A B R1 f g, !Equivalence R1, !Proper (R2 ==> R1) f} :
  Inj R1 R2 g.
Proof.
  intros x y E. rewrite <-(cancel f g x), <-(cancel f g y), E. reflexivity.
Qed.
Lemma cancel_surj `{Cancel A B R1 f g} : Surj R1 f.
Proof. intros y. exists (g y). auto. Qed.

(** The following lemmas are specific versions of the projections of the above
type classes for Leibniz equality. These lemmas allow us to enforce Coq not to
use the setoid rewriting mechanism. *)
Lemma idemp_L {A} f `{!@IdemP A (=) f} x : f x x = x.
Proof. auto. Qed.
Lemma comm_L {A B} f `{!@Comm A B (=) f} x y : f x y = f y x.
Proof. auto. Qed.
Lemma left_id_L {A} i f `{!@LeftId A (=) i f} x : f i x = x.
Proof. auto. Qed.
Lemma right_id_L {A} i f `{!@RightId A (=) i f} x : f x i = x.
Proof. auto. Qed.
Lemma assoc_L {A} f `{!@Assoc A (=) f} x y z : f x (f y z) = f (f x y) z.
Proof. auto. Qed.
Lemma left_absorb_L {A} i f `{!@LeftAbsorb A (=) i f} x : f i x = i.
Proof. auto. Qed.
Lemma right_absorb_L {A} i f `{!@RightAbsorb A (=) i f} x : f x i = i.
Proof. auto. Qed.

(** ** Generic orders *)
(** The classes [PreOrder], [PartialOrder], and [TotalOrder] use an arbitrary
relation [R] instead of [⊆] to support multiple orders on the same type. *)
Definition strict {A} (R : relation A) : relation A := λ X Y, R X Y  ¬R Y X.
427
Instance: Params (@strict) 2 := {}.
428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437
Class PartialOrder {A} (R : relation A) : Prop := {
  partial_order_pre :> PreOrder R;
  partial_order_anti_symm :> AntiSymm (=) R
}.
Class TotalOrder {A} (R : relation A) : Prop := {
  total_order_partial :> PartialOrder R;
  total_order_trichotomy :> Trichotomy (strict R)
}.

(** * Logic *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
438 439
Instance prop_inhabited : Inhabited Prop := populate True.

440
Notation "(∧)" := and (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
441 442
Notation "( A ∧.)" := (and A) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(.∧ B )" := (λ A, A  B) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
443

444
Notation "(∨)" := or (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
445 446
Notation "( A ∨.)" := (or A) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(.∨ B )" := (λ A, A  B) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
447

448
Notation "(↔)" := iff (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
449 450
Notation "( A ↔.)" := (iff A) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(.↔ B )" := (λ A, A  B) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
451

Tej Chajed's avatar
Tej Chajed committed
452 453
Hint Extern 0 (_  _) => reflexivity : core.
Hint Extern 0 (_  _) => symmetry; assumption : core.
454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464

Lemma or_l P Q : ¬Q  P  Q  P.
Proof. tauto. Qed.
Lemma or_r P Q : ¬P  P  Q  Q.
Proof. tauto. Qed.
Lemma and_wlog_l (P Q : Prop) : (Q  P)  Q  (P  Q).
Proof. tauto. Qed.
Lemma and_wlog_r (P Q : Prop) : P  (P  Q)  (P  Q).
Proof. tauto. Qed.
Lemma impl_transitive (P Q R : Prop) : (P  Q)  (Q  R)  (P  R).
Proof. tauto. Qed.
465 466 467 468 469 470
Lemma forall_proper {A} (P Q : A  Prop) :
  ( x, P x  Q x)  ( x, P x)  ( x, Q x).
Proof. firstorder. Qed.
Lemma exist_proper {A} (P Q : A  Prop) :
  ( x, P x  Q x)  ( x, P x)  ( x, Q x).
Proof. firstorder. Qed.
471

472
Instance: Comm () (=@{A}).
473
Proof. red; intuition. Qed.
474
Instance: Comm () (λ x y, y =@{A} x).
475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513
Proof. red; intuition. Qed.
Instance: Comm () ().
Proof. red; intuition. Qed.
Instance: Comm () ().
Proof. red; intuition. Qed.
Instance: Assoc () ().
Proof. red; intuition. Qed.
Instance: IdemP () ().
Proof. red; intuition. Qed.
Instance: Comm () ().
Proof. red; intuition. Qed.
Instance: Assoc () ().
Proof. red; intuition. Qed.
Instance: IdemP () ().
Proof. red; intuition. Qed.
Instance: LeftId () True ().
Proof. red; intuition. Qed.
Instance: RightId () True ().
Proof. red; intuition. Qed.
Instance: LeftAbsorb () False ().
Proof. red; intuition. Qed.
Instance: RightAbsorb () False ().
Proof. red; intuition. Qed.
Instance: LeftId () False ().
Proof. red; intuition. Qed.
Instance: RightId () False ().
Proof. red; intuition. Qed.
Instance: LeftAbsorb () True ().
Proof. red; intuition. Qed.
Instance: RightAbsorb () True ().
Proof. red; intuition. Qed.
Instance: LeftId () True impl.
Proof. unfold impl. red; intuition. Qed.
Instance: RightAbsorb () True impl.
Proof. unfold impl. red; intuition. Qed.


(** * Common data types *)
(** ** Functions *)
514
Notation "(→)" := (λ A B, A  B) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
515 516
Notation "( A →.)" := (λ B, A  B) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(.→ B )" := (λ A, A  B) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
517

518
Notation "t $ r" := (t r)
519 520
  (at level 65, right associativity, only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "($)" := (λ f x, f x) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
521
Notation "(.$ x )" := (λ f, f x) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
522

523 524
Infix "∘" := compose : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(∘)" := compose (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
525 526
Notation "( f ∘.)" := (compose f) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(.∘ f )" := (λ g, compose g f) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
527

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
528 529 530
Instance impl_inhabited {A} `{Inhabited B} : Inhabited (A  B) :=
  populate (λ _, inhabitant).

531 532
(** Ensure that [simpl] unfolds [id], [compose], and [flip] when fully
applied. *)
533 534 535 536
Arguments id _ _ / : assert.
Arguments compose _ _ _ _ _ _ / : assert.
Arguments flip _ _ _ _ _ _ / : assert.
Arguments const _ _ _ _ / : assert.
537
Typeclasses Transparent id compose flip const.
538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584

Definition fun_map {A A' B B'} (f: A'  A) (g: B  B') (h : A  B) : A'  B' :=
  g  h  f.

Instance const_proper `{R1 : relation A, R2 : relation B} (x : B) :
  Reflexive R2  Proper (R1 ==> R2) (λ _, x).
Proof. intros ? y1 y2; reflexivity. Qed.

Instance id_inj {A} : Inj (=) (=) (@id A).
Proof. intros ??; auto. Qed.
Instance compose_inj {A B C} R1 R2 R3 (f : A  B) (g : B  C) :
  Inj R1 R2 f  Inj R2 R3 g  Inj R1 R3 (g  f).
Proof. red; intuition. Qed.

Instance id_surj {A} : Surj (=) (@id A).
Proof. intros y; exists y; reflexivity. Qed.
Instance compose_surj {A B C} R (f : A  B) (g : B  C) :
  Surj (=) f  Surj R g  Surj R (g  f).
Proof.
  intros ?? x. unfold compose. destruct (surj g x) as [y ?].
  destruct (surj f y) as [z ?]. exists z. congruence.
Qed.

Instance id_comm {A B} (x : B) : Comm (=) (λ _ _ : A, x).
Proof. intros ?; reflexivity. Qed.
Instance id_assoc {A} (x : A) : Assoc (=) (λ _ _ : A, x).
Proof. intros ???; reflexivity. Qed.
Instance const1_assoc {A} : Assoc (=) (λ x _ : A, x).
Proof. intros ???; reflexivity. Qed.
Instance const2_assoc {A} : Assoc (=) (λ _ x : A, x).
Proof. intros ???; reflexivity. Qed.
Instance const1_idemp {A} : IdemP (=) (λ x _ : A, x).
Proof. intros ?; reflexivity. Qed.
Instance const2_idemp {A} : IdemP (=) (λ _ x : A, x).
Proof. intros ?; reflexivity. Qed.

(** ** Lists *)
Instance list_inhabited {A} : Inhabited (list A) := populate [].

Definition zip_with {A B C} (f : A  B  C) : list A  list B  list C :=
  fix go l1 l2 :=
  match l1, l2 with x1 :: l1, x2 :: l2 => f x1 x2 :: go l1 l2 | _ , _ => [] end.
Notation zip := (zip_with pair).

(** ** Booleans *)
(** The following coercion allows us to use Booleans as propositions. *)
Coercion Is_true : bool >-> Sortclass.
Tej Chajed's avatar
Tej Chajed committed
585 586 587
Hint Unfold Is_true : core.
Hint Immediate Is_true_eq_left : core.
Hint Resolve orb_prop_intro andb_prop_intro : core.
588 589 590 591 592 593
Notation "(&&)" := andb (only parsing).
Notation "(||)" := orb (only parsing).
Infix "&&*" := (zip_with (&&)) (at level 40).
Infix "||*" := (zip_with (||)) (at level 50).

Instance bool_inhabated : Inhabited bool := populate true.
594

595 596 597 598 599
Definition bool_le (β1 β2 : bool) : Prop := negb β1 || β2.
Infix "=.>" := bool_le (at level 70).
Infix "=.>*" := (Forall2 bool_le) (at level 70).
Instance: PartialOrder bool_le.
Proof. repeat split; repeat intros [|]; compute; tauto. Qed.
600

601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608
Lemma andb_True b1 b2 : b1 && b2  b1  b2.
Proof. destruct b1, b2; simpl; tauto. Qed.
Lemma orb_True b1 b2 : b1 || b2  b1  b2.
Proof. destruct b1, b2; simpl; tauto. Qed.
Lemma negb_True b : negb b  ¬b.
Proof. destruct b; simpl; tauto. Qed.
Lemma Is_true_false (b : bool) : b = false  ¬b.
Proof. now intros -> ?. Qed.
609

610 611
(** ** Unit *)
Instance unit_equiv : Equiv unit := λ _ _, True.
612
Instance unit_equivalence : Equivalence (@{unit}).
613
Proof. repeat split. Qed.
614 615
Instance unit_leibniz : LeibnizEquiv unit.
Proof. intros [] []; reflexivity. Qed.
616
Instance unit_inhabited: Inhabited unit := populate ().
617

Ralf Jung's avatar
Ralf Jung committed
618 619 620 621 622 623 624
(** ** Empty *)
Instance Empty_set_equiv : Equiv Empty_set := λ _ _, True.
Instance Empty_set_equivalence : Equivalence (@{Empty_set}).
Proof. repeat split. Qed.
Instance Empty_set_leibniz : LeibnizEquiv Empty_set.
Proof. intros [] []; reflexivity. Qed.

625
(** ** Products *)
626 627
Notation "( x ,.)" := (pair x) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(., y )" := (λ x, (x,y)) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
628

629 630
Notation "p .1" := (fst p) (at level 2, left associativity, format "p .1").
Notation "p .2" := (snd p) (at level 2, left associativity, format "p .2").
631

632 633 634
Instance: Params (@pair) 2 := {}.
Instance: Params (@fst) 2 := {}.
Instance: Params (@snd) 2 := {}.
635

636 637 638 639 640 641 642
Notation curry := prod_curry.
Notation uncurry := prod_uncurry.
Definition curry3 {A B C D} (f : A  B  C  D) (p : A * B * C) : D :=
  let '(a,b,c) := p in f a b c.
Definition curry4 {A B C D E} (f : A  B  C  D  E) (p : A * B * C * D) : E :=
  let '(a,b,c,d) := p in f a b c d.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
643 644 645 646 647
Definition uncurry3 {A B C D} (f : A * B * C  D) (a : A) (b : B) (c : C) : D :=
  f (a, b, c).
Definition uncurry4 {A B C D E} (f : A * B * C * D  E)
  (a : A) (b : B) (c : C) (d : D) : E := f (a, b, c, d).

648 649
Definition prod_map {A A' B B'} (f: A  A') (g: B  B') (p : A * B) : A' * B' :=
  (f (p.1), g (p.2)).
650
Arguments prod_map {_ _ _ _} _ _ !_ / : assert.
651

652 653
Definition prod_zip {A A' A'' B B' B''} (f : A  A'  A'') (g : B  B'  B'')
    (p : A * B) (q : A' * B') : A'' * B'' := (f (p.1) (q.1), g (p.2) (q.2)).
654
Arguments prod_zip {_ _ _ _ _ _} _ _ !_ !_ / : assert.
655

656 657 658
Instance prod_inhabited {A B} (iA : Inhabited A)
    (iB : Inhabited B) : Inhabited (A * B) :=
  match iA, iB with populate x, populate y => populate (x,y) end.
659

660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667
Instance pair_inj : Inj2 (=) (=) (=) (@pair A B).
Proof. injection 1; auto. Qed.
Instance prod_map_inj {A A' B B'} (f : A  A') (g : B  B') :
  Inj (=) (=) f  Inj (=) (=) g  Inj (=) (=) (prod_map f g).
Proof.
  intros ?? [??] [??] ?; simpl in *; f_equal;
    [apply (inj f)|apply (inj g)]; congruence.
Qed.
668

669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684
Definition prod_relation {A B} (R1 : relation A) (R2 : relation B) :
  relation (A * B) := λ x y, R1 (x.1) (y.1)  R2 (x.2) (y.2).
Section prod_relation.
  Context `{R1 : relation A, R2 : relation B}.
  Global Instance prod_relation_refl :
    Reflexive R1  Reflexive R2  Reflexive (prod_relation R1 R2).
  Proof. firstorder eauto. Qed.
  Global Instance prod_relation_sym :
    Symmetric R1  Symmetric R2  Symmetric (prod_relation R1 R2).
  Proof. firstorder eauto. Qed.
  Global Instance prod_relation_trans :
    Transitive R1  Transitive R2  Transitive (prod_relation R1 R2).
  Proof. firstorder eauto. Qed.
  Global Instance prod_relation_equiv :
    Equivalence R1  Equivalence R2  Equivalence (prod_relation R1 R2).
  Proof. split; apply _. Qed.
685

686 687
  Global Instance pair_proper' : Proper (R1 ==> R2 ==> prod_relation R1 R2) pair.
  Proof. firstorder eauto. Qed.
688 689
  Global Instance pair_inj' : Inj2 R1 R2 (prod_relation R1 R2) pair.
  Proof. inversion_clear 1; eauto. Qed.
690 691 692 693 694
  Global Instance fst_proper' : Proper (prod_relation R1 R2 ==> R1) fst.
  Proof. firstorder eauto. Qed.
  Global Instance snd_proper' : Proper (prod_relation R1 R2 ==> R2) snd.
  Proof. firstorder eauto. Qed.
End prod_relation.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
695

696 697
Instance prod_equiv `{Equiv A,Equiv B} : Equiv (A * B) := prod_relation () ().
Instance pair_proper `{Equiv A, Equiv B} :
698 699
  Proper (() ==> () ==> ()) (@pair A B) := _.
Instance pair_equiv_inj `{Equiv A, Equiv B} : Inj2 () () () (@pair A B) := _.
700 701 702
Instance fst_proper `{Equiv A, Equiv B} : Proper (() ==> ()) (@fst A B) := _.
Instance snd_proper `{Equiv A, Equiv B} : Proper (() ==> ()) (@snd A B) := _.
Typeclasses Opaque prod_equiv.
703

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
704 705
Instance prod_leibniz `{LeibnizEquiv A, LeibnizEquiv B} : LeibnizEquiv (A * B).
Proof. intros [??] [??] [??]; f_equal; apply leibniz_equiv; auto. Qed.
706

707
(** ** Sums *)
708 709
Definition sum_map {A A' B B'} (f: A  A') (g: B  B') (xy : A + B) : A' + B' :=
  match xy with inl x => inl (f x) | inr y => inr (g y) end.
710
Arguments sum_map {_ _ _ _} _ _ !_ / : assert.
711

712
Instance sum_inhabited_l {A B} (iA : Inhabited A) : Inhabited (A + B) :=
713
  match iA with populate x => populate (inl x) end.
714
Instance sum_inhabited_r {A B} (iB : Inhabited A) : Inhabited (A + B) :=
715
  match iB with populate y => populate (inl y) end.
716

717 718 719 720
Instance inl_inj : Inj (=) (=) (@inl A B).
Proof. injection 1; auto. Qed.
Instance inr_inj : Inj (=) (=) (@inr A B).
Proof. injection 1; auto. Qed.
721

722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748
Instance sum_map_inj {A A' B B'} (f : A  A') (g : B  B') :
  Inj (=) (=) f  Inj (=) (=) g  Inj (=) (=) (sum_map f g).
Proof. intros ?? [?|?] [?|?] [=]; f_equal; apply (inj _); auto. Qed.

Inductive sum_relation {A B}
     (R1 : relation A) (R2 : relation B) : relation (A + B) :=
  | inl_related x1 x2 : R1 x1 x2  sum_relation R1 R2 (inl x1) (inl x2)
  | inr_related y1 y2 : R2 y1 y2  sum_relation R1 R2 (inr y1) (inr y2).

Section sum_relation.
  Context `{R1 : relation A, R2 : relation B}.
  Global Instance sum_relation_refl :
    Reflexive R1  Reflexive R2  Reflexive (sum_relation R1 R2).
  Proof. intros ?? [?|?]; constructor; reflexivity. Qed.
  Global Instance sum_relation_sym :
    Symmetric R1  Symmetric R2  Symmetric (sum_relation R1 R2).
  Proof. destruct 3; constructor; eauto. Qed.
  Global Instance sum_relation_trans :
    Transitive R1  Transitive R2  Transitive (sum_relation R1 R2).
  Proof. destruct 3; inversion_clear 1; constructor; eauto. Qed.
  Global Instance sum_relation_equiv :
    Equivalence R1  Equivalence R2  Equivalence (sum_relation R1 R2).
  Proof. split; apply _. Qed.
  Global Instance inl_proper' : Proper (R1 ==> sum_relation R1 R2) inl.
  Proof. constructor; auto. Qed.
  Global Instance inr_proper' : Proper (R2 ==> sum_relation R1 R2) inr.
  Proof. constructor; auto. Qed.
749 750 751 752
  Global Instance inl_inj' : Inj R1 (sum_relation R1 R2) inl.
  Proof. inversion_clear 1; auto. Qed.
  Global Instance inr_inj' : Inj R2 (sum_relation R1 R2) inr.
  Proof. inversion_clear 1; auto. Qed.
753 754 755 756 757
End sum_relation.

Instance sum_equiv `{Equiv A, Equiv B} : Equiv (A + B) := sum_relation () ().
Instance inl_proper `{Equiv A, Equiv B} : Proper (() ==> ()) (@inl A B) := _.
Instance inr_proper `{Equiv A, Equiv B} : Proper (() ==> ()) (@inr A B) := _.
758 759
Instance inl_equiv_inj `{Equiv A, Equiv B} : Inj () () (@inl A B) := _.
Instance inr_equiv_inj `{Equiv A, Equiv B} : Inj () () (@inr A B) := _.
760 761
Typeclasses Opaque sum_equiv.

762 763
(** ** Option *)
Instance option_inhabited {A} : Inhabited (option A) := populate None.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
764

765
(** ** Sigma types *)
766 767 768
Arguments existT {_ _} _ _ : assert.
Arguments projT1 {_ _} _ : assert.
Arguments projT2 {_ _} _ : assert.
769

770 771 772
Arguments exist {_} _ _ _ : assert.
Arguments proj1_sig {_ _} _ : assert.
Arguments proj2_sig {_ _} _ : assert.
773 774
Notation "x ↾ p" := (exist _ x p) (at level 20) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "` x" := (proj1_sig x) (at level 10, format "` x") : stdpp_scope.
775

776 777 778
Lemma proj1_sig_inj {A} (P : A  Prop) x (Px : P x) y (Py : P y) :
  xPx = yPy  x = y.
Proof. injection 1; trivial. Qed.
779

780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789
Section sig_map.
  Context `{P : A  Prop} `{Q : B  Prop} (f : A  B) (Hf :  x, P x  Q (f x)).
  Definition sig_map (x : sig P) : sig Q := f (`x)  Hf _ (proj2_sig x).
  Global Instance sig_map_inj:
    ( x, ProofIrrel (P x))  Inj (=) (=) f  Inj (=) (=) sig_map.
  Proof.
    intros ?? [x Hx] [y Hy]. injection 1. intros Hxy.
    apply (inj f) in Hxy; subst. rewrite (proof_irrel _ Hy). auto.
  Qed.
End sig_map.
790
Arguments sig_map _ _ _ _ _ _ !_ / : assert.
791

792 793 794 795
Definition proj1_ex {P : Prop} {Q : P  Prop} (p :  x, Q x) : P :=
  let '(ex_intro _ x _) := p in x.
Definition proj2_ex {P : Prop} {Q : P  Prop} (p :  x, Q x) : Q (proj1_ex p) :=
  let '(ex_intro _ x H) := p in H.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
796

797
(** * Operations on sets *)
798
(** We define operational type classes for the traditional operations and
799
relations on sets: the empty set [∅], the union [(∪)],
800
intersection [(∩)], and difference [(∖)], the singleton [{[_]}], the subset
801
[(⊆)] and element of [(∈)] relation, and disjointess [(##)]. *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
802
Class Empty A := empty: A.
803
Hint Mode Empty ! : typeclass_instances.
804
Notation "∅" := empty (format "∅") : stdpp_scope.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
805

806 807
Instance empty_inhabited `(Empty A) : Inhabited A := populate .

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
808
Class Union A := union: A  A  A.
809
Hint Mode Union ! : typeclass_instances.
810
Instance: Params (@union) 2 := {}.
811 812
Infix "∪" := union (at level 50, left associativity) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(∪)" := union (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
813 814
Notation "( x ∪.)" := (union x) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(.∪ x )" := (λ y, union y x) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
815 816
Infix "∪*" := (zip_with ()) (at level 50, left associativity) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(∪*)" := (zip_with ()) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
817
Infix "∪**" := (zip_with (zip_with ()))
818
  (at level 50, left associativity) : stdpp_scope.
819
Infix "∪*∪**" := (zip_with (prod_zip () (*)))
820
  (at level 50, left associativity) : stdpp_scope.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
821

822
Definition union_list `{Empty A} `{Union A} : list A  A := fold_right () .
823
Arguments union_list _ _ _ !_ / : assert.
824
Notation "⋃ l" := (union_list l) (at level 20, format "⋃  l") : stdpp_scope.
825

826 827 828 829 830
Class DisjUnion A := disj_union: A  A  A.
Hint Mode DisjUnion ! : typeclass_instances.
Instance: Params (@disj_union) 2 := {}.
Infix "⊎" := disj_union (at level 50, left associativity) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(⊎)" := disj_union (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
831 832
Notation "( x ⊎.)" := (disj_union x) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(.⊎ x )" := (λ y, disj_union y x) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
833

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
834
Class Intersection A := intersection: A  A  A.
835
Hint Mode Intersection ! : typeclass_instances.
836
Instance: Params (@intersection) 2 := {}.
837 838
Infix "∩" := intersection (at level 40) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(∩)" := intersection (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
839 840
Notation "( x ∩.)" := (intersection x) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(.∩ x )" := (λ y, intersection y x) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
841 842

Class Difference A := difference: A  A  A.
843
Hint Mode Difference ! : typeclass_instances.
844
Instance: Params (@difference) 2 := {}.
845 846
Infix "∖" := difference (at level 40, left associativity) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(∖)" := difference (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
847 848
Notation "( x ∖.)" := (difference x) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(.∖ x )" := (λ y, difference y x) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
849 850
Infix "∖*" := (zip_with ()) (at level 40, left associativity) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(∖*)" := (zip_with ()) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
851
Infix "∖**" := (zip_with (zip_with ()))
852
  (at level 40, left associativity) : stdpp_scope.
853
Infix "∖*∖**" := (zip_with (prod_zip () (*)))
854
  (at level 50, left associativity) : stdpp_scope.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar