option.v 17.4 KB
Newer Older
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
1
(* Copyright (c) 2012-2015, Robbert Krebbers. *)
2 3 4
(* This file is distributed under the terms of the BSD license. *)
(** This file collects general purpose definitions and theorems on the option
data type that are not in the Coq standard library. *)
5
From stdpp Require Export tactics.
6

7 8 9 10
Inductive option_reflect {A} (P : A  Prop) (Q : Prop) : option A  Type :=
  | ReflectSome x : P x  option_reflect P Q (Some x)
  | ReflectNone : Q  option_reflect P Q None.

11 12
(** * General definitions and theorems *)
(** Basic properties about equality. *)
13
Lemma None_ne_Some {A} (x : A) : None  Some x.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
14
Proof. congruence. Qed.
15
Lemma Some_ne_None {A} (x : A) : Some x  None.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
16
Proof. congruence. Qed.
17
Lemma eq_None_ne_Some {A} (mx : option A) x : mx = None  mx  Some x.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
18
Proof. congruence. Qed.
19
Instance Some_inj {A} : Inj (=) (=) (@Some A).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
20 21
Proof. congruence. Qed.

22 23
(** The [from_option] is the eliminator for option. *)
Definition from_option {A B} (f : A  B) (y : B) (mx : option A) : B :=
24
  match mx with None => y | Some x => f x end.
25 26
Instance: Params (@from_option) 3.
Arguments from_option {_ _} _ _ !_ /.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
27

28 29 30
(* The eliminator again, but with the arguments in different order, which is
sometimes more convenient. *)
Notation default y mx f := (from_option f y mx) (only parsing).
31

32 33
(** An alternative, but equivalent, definition of equality on the option
data type. This theorem is useful to prove that two options are the same. *)
34 35 36
Lemma option_eq {A} (mx my: option A): mx = my   x, mx = Some x  my = Some x.
Proof. split; [by intros; by subst |]. destruct mx, my; naive_solver. Qed.
Lemma option_eq_1 {A} (mx my: option A) x : mx = my  mx = Some x  my = Some x.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
37
Proof. congruence. Qed.
38 39
Lemma option_eq_1_alt {A} (mx my : option A) x :
  mx = my  my = Some x  mx = Some x.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
40
Proof. congruence. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
41

42 43 44 45
Definition is_Some {A} (mx : option A) :=  x, mx = Some x.
Instance: Params (@is_Some) 1.

Lemma mk_is_Some {A} (mx : option A) x : mx = Some x  is_Some mx.
46 47 48 49 50
Proof. intros; red; subst; eauto. Qed.
Hint Resolve mk_is_Some.
Lemma is_Some_None {A} : ¬is_Some (@None A).
Proof. by destruct 1. Qed.
Hint Resolve is_Some_None.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
51

52
Instance is_Some_pi {A} (mx : option A) : ProofIrrel (is_Some mx).
53
Proof.
54 55
  set (P (mx : option A) := match mx with Some _ => True | _ => False end).
  set (f mx := match mx return P mx  is_Some mx with
56
    Some _ => λ _, ex_intro _ _ eq_refl | None => False_rect _ end).
57 58 59 60
  set (g mx (H : is_Some mx) :=
    match H return P mx with ex_intro _ p => eq_rect _ _ I _ (eq_sym p) end).
  assert ( mx H, f mx (g mx H) = H) as f_g by (by intros ? [??]; subst).
  intros p1 p2. rewrite <-(f_g _ p1), <-(f_g _ p2). by destruct mx, p1.
61
Qed.
62 63
Instance is_Some_dec {A} (mx : option A) : Decision (is_Some mx) :=
  match mx with
64 65
  | Some x => left (ex_intro _ x eq_refl)
  | None => right is_Some_None
66
  end.
67

68 69 70 71 72
Definition is_Some_proj {A} {mx : option A} : is_Some mx  A :=
  match mx with Some x => λ _, x | None => False_rect _  is_Some_None end.
Definition Some_dec {A} (mx : option A) : { x | mx = Some x } + { mx = None } :=
  match mx return { x | mx = Some x } + { mx = None } with
  | Some x => inleft (x  eq_refl _)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
73 74
  | None => inright eq_refl
  end.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
75

76 77 78 79
Lemma eq_None_not_Some {A} (mx : option A) : mx = None  ¬is_Some mx.
Proof. destruct mx; unfold is_Some; naive_solver. Qed.
Lemma not_eq_None_Some {A} (mx : option A) : mx  None  is_Some mx.
Proof. rewrite eq_None_not_Some; apply dec_stable; tauto. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
80

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
81
(** Lifting a relation point-wise to option *)
82 83 84
Inductive option_Forall2 {A B} (R: A  B  Prop) : option A  option B  Prop :=
  | Some_Forall2 x y : R x y  option_Forall2 R (Some x) (Some y)
  | None_Forall2 : option_Forall2 R None None.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93
Definition option_relation {A B} (R: A  B  Prop) (P: A  Prop) (Q: B  Prop)
    (mx : option A) (my : option B) : Prop :=
  match mx, my with
  | Some x, Some y => R x y
  | Some x, None => P x
  | None, Some y => Q y
  | None, None => True
  end.

94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106
Section Forall2.
  Context {A} (R : relation A).

  Global Instance option_Forall2_refl : Reflexive R  Reflexive (option_Forall2 R).
  Proof. intros ? [?|]; by constructor. Qed.
  Global Instance option_Forall2_sym : Symmetric R  Symmetric (option_Forall2 R).
  Proof. destruct 2; by constructor. Qed.
  Global Instance option_Forall2_trans : Transitive R  Transitive (option_Forall2 R).
  Proof. destruct 2; inversion_clear 1; constructor; etrans; eauto. Qed.
  Global Instance option_Forall2_equiv : Equivalence R  Equivalence (option_Forall2 R).
  Proof. destruct 1; split; apply _. Qed.
End Forall2.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
107
(** Setoids *)
108 109
Instance option_equiv `{Equiv A} : Equiv (option A) := option_Forall2 ().

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
110
Section setoids.
111
  Context `{Equiv A} `{!Equivalence (() : relation A)}.
112
  Implicit Types mx my : option A.
113 114

  Lemma equiv_option_Forall2 mx my : mx  my  option_Forall2 () mx my.
115
  Proof. done. Qed.
116

117
  Global Instance option_equivalence : Equivalence (() : relation (option A)).
118
  Proof. apply _. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
119 120 121
  Global Instance Some_proper : Proper (() ==> ()) (@Some A).
  Proof. by constructor. Qed.
  Global Instance option_leibniz `{!LeibnizEquiv A} : LeibnizEquiv (option A).
122
  Proof. intros x y; destruct 1; fold_leibniz; congruence. Qed.
123

124
  Lemma equiv_None mx : mx  None  mx = None.
125
  Proof. split; [by inversion_clear 1|by intros ->]. Qed.
126
  Lemma equiv_Some_inv_l mx my x :
127 128
    mx  my  mx = Some x   y, my = Some y  x  y.
  Proof. destruct 1; naive_solver. Qed.
129 130
  Lemma equiv_Some_inv_r mx my y :
    mx  my  my = Some y   x, mx = Some x  x  y.
131
  Proof. destruct 1; naive_solver. Qed.
132 133 134 135
  Lemma equiv_Some_inv_l' my x : Some x  my   x', Some x' = my  x  x'.
  Proof. intros ?%(equiv_Some_inv_l _ _ x); naive_solver. Qed.
  Lemma equiv_Some_inv_r' mx y : mx  Some y   y', mx = Some y'  y  y'.
  Proof. intros ?%(equiv_Some_inv_r _ _ y); naive_solver. Qed.
136

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
137 138
  Global Instance is_Some_proper : Proper (() ==> iff) (@is_Some A).
  Proof. inversion_clear 1; split; eauto. Qed.
139 140 141
  Global Instance from_option_proper {B} (R : relation B) (f : A  B) :
    Proper (() ==> R) f  Proper (R ==> () ==> R) (from_option f).
  Proof. destruct 3; simpl; auto. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
142 143
End setoids.

144 145
Typeclasses Opaque option_equiv.

146
(** Equality on [option] is decidable. *)
147 148 149 150 151 152
Instance option_eq_None_dec {A} (mx : option A) : Decision (mx = None) :=
  match mx with Some _ => right (Some_ne_None _) | None => left eq_refl end.
Instance option_None_eq_dec {A} (mx : option A) : Decision (None = mx) :=
  match mx with Some _ => right (None_ne_Some _) | None => left eq_refl end.
Instance option_eq_dec {A} {dec :  x y : A, Decision (x = y)}
  (mx my : option A) : Decision (mx = my).
153 154
Proof.
 refine
155 156
  match mx, my with
  | Some x, Some y => cast_if (decide (x = y))
157
  | None, None => left _ | _, _ => right _
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
158
  end; clear dec; abstract congruence.
159
Defined.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
160

161
(** * Monadic operations *)
162
Instance option_ret: MRet option := @Some.
163 164 165 166
Instance option_bind: MBind option := λ A B f mx,
  match mx with Some x => f x | None => None end.
Instance option_join: MJoin option := λ A mmx,
  match mmx with Some mx => mx | None => None end.
167
Instance option_fmap: FMap option := @option_map.
168 169
Instance option_guard: MGuard option := λ P dec A f,
  match dec with left H => f H | _ => None end.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
170

171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191
Lemma fmap_is_Some {A B} (f : A  B) mx : is_Some (f <$> mx)  is_Some mx.
Proof. unfold is_Some; destruct mx; naive_solver. Qed.
Lemma fmap_Some {A B} (f : A  B) mx y :
  f <$> mx = Some y   x, mx = Some x  y = f x.
Proof. destruct mx; naive_solver. Qed.
Lemma fmap_None {A B} (f : A  B) mx : f <$> mx = None  mx = None.
Proof. by destruct mx. Qed.
Lemma option_fmap_id {A} (mx : option A) : id <$> mx = mx.
Proof. by destruct mx. Qed.
Lemma option_fmap_compose {A B} (f : A  B) {C} (g : B  C) mx :
  g  f <$> mx = g <$> f <$> mx.
Proof. by destruct mx. Qed.
Lemma option_fmap_ext {A B} (f g : A  B) mx :
  ( x, f x = g x)  f <$> mx = g <$> mx.
Proof. intros; destruct mx; f_equal/=; auto. Qed.
Lemma option_fmap_setoid_ext `{Equiv A, Equiv B} (f g : A  B) mx :
  ( x, f x  g x)  f <$> mx  g <$> mx.
Proof. destruct mx; constructor; auto. Qed.
Lemma option_fmap_bind {A B C} (f : A  B) (g : B  option C) mx :
  (f <$> mx) = g = mx = g  f.
Proof. by destruct mx. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
192
Lemma option_bind_assoc {A B C} (f : A  option B)
193 194 195 196 197 198 199
  (g : B  option C) (mx : option A) : (mx = f) = g = mx = (mbind g  f).
Proof. by destruct mx; simpl. Qed.
Lemma option_bind_ext {A B} (f g : A  option B) mx my :
  ( x, f x = g x)  mx = my  mx = f = my = g.
Proof. destruct mx, my; naive_solver. Qed.
Lemma option_bind_ext_fun {A B} (f g : A  option B) mx :
  ( x, f x = g x)  mx = f = mx = g.
200
Proof. intros. by apply option_bind_ext. Qed.
201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208
Lemma bind_Some {A B} (f : A  option B) (mx : option A) y :
  mx = f = Some y   x, mx = Some x  f x = Some y.
Proof. destruct mx; naive_solver. Qed.
Lemma bind_None {A B} (f : A  option B) (mx : option A) :
  mx = f = None  mx = None   x, mx = Some x  f x = None.
Proof. destruct mx; naive_solver. Qed.
Lemma bind_with_Some {A} (mx : option A) : mx = Some = mx.
Proof. by destruct mx. Qed.
209

210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233
(** ** Inverses of constructors *)
(** We can do this in a fancy way using dependent types, but rewrite does
not particularly like type level reductions. *)
Class Maybe {A B : Type} (c : A  B) :=
  maybe : B  option A.
Arguments maybe {_ _} _ {_} !_ /.
Class Maybe2 {A1 A2 B : Type} (c : A1  A2  B) :=
  maybe2 : B  option (A1 * A2).
Arguments maybe2 {_ _ _} _ {_} !_ /.
Class Maybe3 {A1 A2 A3 B : Type} (c : A1  A2  A3  B) :=
  maybe3 : B  option (A1 * A2 * A3).
Arguments maybe3 {_ _ _ _} _ {_} !_ /.
Class Maybe4 {A1 A2 A3 A4 B : Type} (c : A1  A2  A3  A4  B) :=
  maybe4 : B  option (A1 * A2 * A3 * A4).
Arguments maybe4 {_ _ _ _ _} _ {_} !_ /.

Instance maybe_comp `{Maybe B C c1, Maybe A B c2} : Maybe (c1  c2) := λ x,
  maybe c1 x = maybe c2.
Arguments maybe_comp _ _ _ _ _ _ _ !_ /.

Instance maybe_inl {A B} : Maybe (@inl A B) := λ xy,
  match xy with inl x => Some x | _ => None end.
Instance maybe_inr {A B} : Maybe (@inr A B) := λ xy,
  match xy with inr y => Some y | _ => None end.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
234 235
Instance maybe_Some {A} : Maybe (@Some A) := id.
Arguments maybe_Some _ !_ /.
236

237
(** * Union, intersection and difference *)
238 239 240 241 242
Instance option_union_with {A} : UnionWith A (option A) := λ f mx my,
  match mx, my with
  | Some x, Some y => f x y
  | Some x, None => Some x
  | None, Some y => Some y
243 244 245
  | None, None => None
  end.
Instance option_intersection_with {A} : IntersectionWith A (option A) :=
246 247 248 249 250
  λ f mx my, match mx, my with Some x, Some y => f x y | _, _ => None end.
Instance option_difference_with {A} : DifferenceWith A (option A) := λ f mx my,
  match mx, my with
  | Some x, Some y => f x y
  | Some x, None => Some x
251 252 253
  | None, _ => None
  end.
Instance option_union {A} : Union (option A) := union_with (λ x _, Some x).
254 255 256 257

Lemma option_union_Some {A} (mx my : option A) z :
  mx  my = Some z  mx = Some z  my = Some z.
Proof. destruct mx, my; naive_solver. Qed.
258

259 260 261 262
Class DiagNone {A B C} (f : option A  option B  option C) :=
  diag_none : f None None = None.

Section union_intersection_difference.
263
  Context {A} (f : A  A  option A).
264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271

  Global Instance union_with_diag_none : DiagNone (union_with f).
  Proof. reflexivity. Qed.
  Global Instance intersection_with_diag_none : DiagNone (intersection_with f).
  Proof. reflexivity. Qed.
  Global Instance difference_with_diag_none : DiagNone (difference_with f).
  Proof. reflexivity. Qed.
  Global Instance union_with_left_id : LeftId (=) None (union_with f).
272
  Proof. by intros [?|]. Qed.
273
  Global Instance union_with_right_id : RightId (=) None (union_with f).
274
  Proof. by intros [?|]. Qed.
275
  Global Instance union_with_comm : Comm (=) f  Comm (=) (union_with f).
276
  Proof. by intros ? [?|] [?|]; compute; rewrite 1?(comm f). Qed.
277
  Global Instance intersection_with_left_ab : LeftAbsorb (=) None (intersection_with f).
278
  Proof. by intros [?|]. Qed.
279
  Global Instance intersection_with_right_ab : RightAbsorb (=) None (intersection_with f).
280
  Proof. by intros [?|]. Qed.
281
  Global Instance difference_with_comm : Comm (=) f  Comm (=) (intersection_with f).
282
  Proof. by intros ? [?|] [?|]; compute; rewrite 1?(comm f). Qed.
283
  Global Instance difference_with_right_id : RightId (=) None (difference_with f).
284
  Proof. by intros [?|]. Qed.
285
End union_intersection_difference.
286 287

(** * Tactics *)
288 289
Tactic Notation "case_option_guard" "as" ident(Hx) :=
  match goal with
290
  | H : appcontext C [@mguard option _ ?P ?dec] |- _ =>
291 292
    change (@mguard option _ P dec) with (λ A (f : P  option A),
      match @decide P dec with left H' => f H' | _ => None end) in *;
293 294
    destruct_decide (@decide P dec) as Hx
  | |- appcontext C [@mguard option _ ?P ?dec] =>
295 296
    change (@mguard option _ P dec) with (λ A (f : P  option A),
      match @decide P dec with left H' => f H' | _ => None end) in *;
297
    destruct_decide (@decide P dec) as Hx
298 299 300
  end.
Tactic Notation "case_option_guard" :=
  let H := fresh in case_option_guard as H.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
301

302 303
Lemma option_guard_True {A} P `{Decision P} (mx : option A) :
  P  guard P; mx = mx.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
304
Proof. intros. by case_option_guard. Qed.
305 306
Lemma option_guard_False {A} P `{Decision P} (mx : option A) :
  ¬P  guard P; mx = None.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
307
Proof. intros. by case_option_guard. Qed.
308 309
Lemma option_guard_iff {A} P Q `{Decision P, Decision Q} (mx : option A) :
  (P  Q)  guard P; mx = guard Q; mx.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
310
Proof. intros [??]. repeat case_option_guard; intuition. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
311

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
312
Tactic Notation "simpl_option" "by" tactic3(tac) :=
313
  let assert_Some_None A mx H := first
314
    [ let x := fresh in evar (x:A); let x' := eval unfold x in x in clear x;
315 316
      assert (mx = Some x') as H by tac
    | assert (mx = None) as H by tac ]
317
  in repeat match goal with
318 319 320
  | H : appcontext [@mret _ _ ?A] |- _ =>
     change (@mret _ _ A) with (@Some A) in H
  | |- appcontext [@mret _ _ ?A] => change (@mret _ _ A) with (@Some A)
321 322 323 324
  | H : context [mbind (M:=option) (A:=?A) ?f ?mx] |- _ =>
    let Hx := fresh in assert_Some_None A mx Hx; rewrite Hx in H; clear Hx
  | H : context [fmap (M:=option) (A:=?A) ?f ?mx] |- _ =>
    let Hx := fresh in assert_Some_None A mx Hx; rewrite Hx in H; clear Hx
325
  | H : context [from_option (A:=?A) _ _ ?mx] |- _ =>
326 327 328
    let Hx := fresh in assert_Some_None A mx Hx; rewrite Hx in H; clear Hx
  | H : context [ match ?mx with _ => _ end ] |- _ =>
    match type of mx with
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
329
    | option ?A =>
330
      let Hx := fresh in assert_Some_None A mx Hx; rewrite Hx in H; clear Hx
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
331
    end
332 333 334 335
  | |- context [mbind (M:=option) (A:=?A) ?f ?mx] =>
    let Hx := fresh in assert_Some_None A mx Hx; rewrite Hx; clear Hx
  | |- context [fmap (M:=option) (A:=?A) ?f ?mx] =>
    let Hx := fresh in assert_Some_None A mx Hx; rewrite Hx; clear Hx
336
  | |- context [from_option (A:=?A) _ _ ?mx] =>
337 338 339
    let Hx := fresh in assert_Some_None A mx Hx; rewrite Hx; clear Hx
  | |- context [ match ?mx with _ => _ end ] =>
    match type of mx with
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
340
    | option ?A =>
341
      let Hx := fresh in assert_Some_None A mx Hx; rewrite Hx; clear Hx
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
342
    end
343 344 345 346
  | H : context [decide _] |- _ => rewrite decide_True in H by tac
  | H : context [decide _] |- _ => rewrite decide_False in H by tac
  | H : context [mguard _ _] |- _ => rewrite option_guard_False in H by tac
  | H : context [mguard _ _] |- _ => rewrite option_guard_True in H by tac
347 348 349 350
  | _ => rewrite decide_True by tac
  | _ => rewrite decide_False by tac
  | _ => rewrite option_guard_True by tac
  | _ => rewrite option_guard_False by tac
351 352 353 354
  | H : context [None  _] |- _ => rewrite (left_id_L None ()) in H
  | H : context [_  None] |- _ => rewrite (right_id_L None ()) in H
  | |- context [None  _] => rewrite (left_id_L None ())
  | |- context [_  None] => rewrite (right_id_L None ())
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
355
  end.
356
Tactic Notation "simplify_option_eq" "by" tactic3(tac) :=
357
  repeat match goal with
358
  | _ => progress simplify_eq/=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
359
  | _ => progress simpl_option by tac
360 361 362 363
  | _ : maybe _ ?x = Some _ |- _ => is_var x; destruct x
  | _ : maybe2 _ ?x = Some _ |- _ => is_var x; destruct x
  | _ : maybe3 _ ?x = Some _ |- _ => is_var x; destruct x
  | _ : maybe4 _ ?x = Some _ |- _ => is_var x; destruct x
364
  | H : _  _ = Some _ |- _ => apply option_union_Some in H; destruct H
365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384
  | H : mbind (M:=option) ?f ?mx = ?my |- _ =>
    match mx with Some _ => fail 1 | None => fail 1 | _ => idtac end;
    match my with Some _ => idtac | None => idtac | _ => fail 1 end;
    let x := fresh in destruct mx as [x|] eqn:?;
      [change (f x = my) in H|change (None = my) in H]
  | H : ?my = mbind (M:=option) ?f ?mx |- _ =>
    match mx with Some _ => fail 1 | None => fail 1 | _ => idtac end;
    match my with Some _ => idtac | None => idtac | _ => fail 1 end;
    let x := fresh in destruct mx as [x|] eqn:?;
      [change (my = f x) in H|change (my = None) in H]
  | H : fmap (M:=option) ?f ?mx = ?my |- _ =>
    match mx with Some _ => fail 1 | None => fail 1 | _ => idtac end;
    match my with Some _ => idtac | None => idtac | _ => fail 1 end;
    let x := fresh in destruct mx as [x|] eqn:?;
      [change (Some (f x) = my) in H|change (None = my) in H]
  | H : ?my = fmap (M:=option) ?f ?mx |- _ =>
    match mx with Some _ => fail 1 | None => fail 1 | _ => idtac end;
    match my with Some _ => idtac | None => idtac | _ => fail 1 end;
    let x := fresh in destruct mx as [x|] eqn:?;
      [change (my = Some (f x)) in H|change (my = None) in H]
385
  | _ => progress case_decide
386
  | _ => progress case_option_guard
387
  end.
388
Tactic Notation "simplify_option_eq" := simplify_option_eq by eauto.