collections.v 21.6 KB
Newer Older
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
1
(* Copyright (c) 2012-2014, Robbert Krebbers. *)
2
3
4
5
6
7
(* This file is distributed under the terms of the BSD license. *)
(** This file collects definitions and theorems on collections. Most
importantly, it implements some tactics to automatically solve goals involving
collections. *)
Require Export base tactics orders.

8
9
10
Instance collection_subseteq `{ElemOf A C} : SubsetEq C := λ X Y,
   x, x  X  x  Y.

11
(** * Basic theorems *)
12
13
Section simple_collection.
  Context `{SimpleCollection A C}.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
14

15
  Lemma elem_of_empty x : x    False.
16
  Proof. split. apply not_elem_of_empty. done. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
17
18
19
20
  Lemma elem_of_union_l x X Y : x  X  x  X  Y.
  Proof. intros. apply elem_of_union. auto. Qed.
  Lemma elem_of_union_r x X Y : x  Y  x  X  Y.
  Proof. intros. apply elem_of_union. auto. Qed.
21
22
23
  Global Instance: EmptySpec C.
  Proof. firstorder auto. Qed.
  Global Instance: JoinSemiLattice C.
24
  Proof. firstorder auto. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
25
  Lemma elem_of_subseteq X Y : X  Y   x, x  X  x  Y.
26
  Proof. done. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
27
28
  Lemma elem_of_equiv X Y : X  Y   x, x  X  x  Y.
  Proof. firstorder. Qed.
29
30
  Lemma elem_of_equiv_alt X Y :
    X  Y  ( x, x  X  x  Y)  ( x, x  Y  x  X).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
31
  Proof. firstorder. Qed.
32
33
  Lemma elem_of_equiv_empty X : X     x, x  X.
  Proof. firstorder. Qed.
34
35
36
37
38
39
  Lemma collection_positive_l X Y : X  Y    X  .
  Proof.
    rewrite !elem_of_equiv_empty. setoid_rewrite elem_of_union. naive_solver.
  Qed.
  Lemma collection_positive_l_alt X Y : X    X  Y  .
  Proof. eauto using collection_positive_l. Qed.
40
41
42
43
  Lemma elem_of_singleton_1 x y : x  {[y]}  x = y.
  Proof. by rewrite elem_of_singleton. Qed.
  Lemma elem_of_singleton_2 x y : x = y  x  {[y]}.
  Proof. by rewrite elem_of_singleton. Qed.
44
45
46
  Lemma elem_of_subseteq_singleton x X : x  X  {[ x ]}  X.
  Proof.
    split.
47
    * intros ??. rewrite elem_of_singleton. by intros ->.
48
49
    * intros Ex. by apply (Ex x), elem_of_singleton.
  Qed.
50
  Global Instance singleton_proper : Proper ((=) ==> ()) singleton.
51
  Proof. by repeat intro; subst. Qed.
52
  Global Instance elem_of_proper: Proper ((=) ==> () ==> iff) () | 5.
53
  Proof. intros ???; subst. firstorder. Qed.
54
  Lemma elem_of_union_list Xs x : x   Xs   X, X  Xs  x  X.
55
56
  Proof.
    split.
57
58
59
60
    * induction Xs; simpl; intros HXs; [by apply elem_of_empty in HXs|].
      setoid_rewrite elem_of_cons. apply elem_of_union in HXs. naive_solver.
    * intros [X []]. induction 1; simpl; [by apply elem_of_union_l |].
      intros. apply elem_of_union_r; auto.
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
  Qed.
  Lemma non_empty_singleton x : {[ x ]}  .
  Proof. intros [E _]. by apply (elem_of_empty x), E, elem_of_singleton. Qed.
  Lemma not_elem_of_singleton x y : x  {[ y ]}  x  y.
  Proof. by rewrite elem_of_singleton. Qed.
  Lemma not_elem_of_union x X Y : x  X  Y  x  X  x  Y.
  Proof. rewrite elem_of_union. tauto. Qed.

69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
  Section leibniz.
    Context `{!LeibnizEquiv C}.
    Lemma elem_of_equiv_L X Y : X = Y   x, x  X  x  Y.
    Proof. unfold_leibniz. apply elem_of_equiv. Qed.
    Lemma elem_of_equiv_alt_L X Y :
      X = Y  ( x, x  X  x  Y)  ( x, x  Y  x  X).
    Proof. unfold_leibniz. apply elem_of_equiv_alt. Qed.
    Lemma elem_of_equiv_empty_L X : X =    x, x  X.
    Proof. unfold_leibniz. apply elem_of_equiv_empty. Qed.
78
79
80
81
    Lemma collection_positive_l_L X Y : X  Y =   X = .
    Proof. unfold_leibniz. apply collection_positive_l. Qed.
    Lemma collection_positive_l_alt_L X Y : X    X  Y  .
    Proof. unfold_leibniz. apply collection_positive_l_alt. Qed.
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
    Lemma non_empty_singleton_L x : {[ x ]}  .
    Proof. unfold_leibniz. apply non_empty_singleton. Qed.
  End leibniz.

  Section dec.
    Context `{ X Y : C, Decision (X  Y)}.
    Global Instance elem_of_dec_slow (x : A) (X : C) : Decision (x  X) | 100.
    Proof.
      refine (cast_if (decide_rel () {[ x ]} X));
        by rewrite elem_of_subseteq_singleton.
    Defined.
  End dec.
94
95
End simple_collection.

96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
Definition of_option `{Singleton A C} `{Empty C} (x : option A) : C :=
  match x with None =>  | Some a => {[ a ]} end.
Lemma elem_of_of_option `{SimpleCollection A C} (x : A) o :
  x  of_option o  o = Some x.
Proof.
  destruct o; simpl; rewrite ?elem_of_empty, ?elem_of_singleton; naive_solver.
Qed.

Global Instance collection_guard `{CollectionMonad M} : MGuard M :=
  λ P dec A x, match dec with left H => x H | _ =>  end.
Lemma elem_of_guard `{CollectionMonad M} `{Decision P} {A} (x : A) (X : M A) :
  x  guard P; X  P  x  X.
Proof.
  unfold mguard, collection_guard; simpl; case_match;
    rewrite ?elem_of_empty; naive_solver.
Qed.

113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
(** * Tactics *)
(** Given a hypothesis [H : _ ∈ _], the tactic [destruct_elem_of H] will
recursively split [H] for [(∪)], [(∩)], [(∖)], [map], [∅], [{[_]}]. *)
Tactic Notation "decompose_elem_of" hyp(H) :=
  let rec go H :=
  lazymatch type of H with
  | _   => apply elem_of_empty in H; destruct H
  | ?x  {[ ?y ]} =>
    apply elem_of_singleton in H; try first [subst y | subst x]
  | _  _  _ =>
    let H1 := fresh in let H2 := fresh in apply elem_of_union in H;
    destruct H as [H1|H2]; [go H1 | go H2]
  | _  _  _ =>
    let H1 := fresh in let H2 := fresh in apply elem_of_intersection in H;
    destruct H as [H1 H2]; go H1; go H2
  | _  _  _ =>
    let H1 := fresh in let H2 := fresh in apply elem_of_difference in H;
    destruct H as [H1 H2]; go H1; go H2
  | ?x  _ <$> _ =>
    let H1 := fresh in apply elem_of_fmap in H;
    destruct H as [? [? H1]]; try (subst x); go H1
  | _  _ = _ =>
    let H1 := fresh in let H2 := fresh in apply elem_of_bind in H;
    destruct H as [? [H1 H2]]; go H1; go H2
  | ?x  mret ?y =>
    apply elem_of_ret in H; try first [subst y | subst x]
  | _  mjoin _ = _ =>
    let H1 := fresh in let H2 := fresh in apply elem_of_join in H;
    destruct H as [? [H1 H2]]; go H1; go H2
142
143
144
145
  | _  guard _; _ =>
    let H1 := fresh in let H2 := fresh in apply elem_of_guard in H;
    destruct H as [H1 H2]; go H2
  | _  of_option _ => apply elem_of_of_option in H
146
147
148
149
150
  | _ => idtac
  end in go H.
Tactic Notation "decompose_elem_of" :=
  repeat_on_hyps (fun H => decompose_elem_of H).

151
152
Ltac decompose_empty := repeat
  match goal with
153
154
155
156
  | H :    |- _ => clear H
  | H :  =  |- _ => clear H
  | H :   _ |- _ => symmetry in H
  | H :  = _ |- _ => symmetry in H
157
158
159
  | H : _  _   |- _ => apply empty_union in H; destruct H
  | H : _  _   |- _ => apply non_empty_union in H; destruct H
  | H : {[ _ ]}   |- _ => destruct (non_empty_singleton _ H)
160
161
162
  | H : _  _ =  |- _ => apply empty_union_L in H; destruct H
  | H : _  _   |- _ => apply non_empty_union_L in H; destruct H
  | H : {[ _ ]} =  |- _ => destruct (non_empty_singleton_L _ H)
163
164
  end.

165
166
167
168
(** The first pass of our collection tactic consists of eliminating all
occurrences of [(∪)], [(∩)], [(∖)], [(<$>)], [∅], [{[_]}], [(≡)], and [(⊆)],
by rewriting these into logically equivalent propositions. For example we
rewrite [A → x ∈ X ∪ ∅] into [A → x ∈ X ∨ False]. *)
169
170
171
172
Ltac unfold_elem_of :=
  repeat_on_hyps (fun H =>
    repeat match type of H with
    | context [ _  _ ] => setoid_rewrite elem_of_subseteq in H
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
173
    | context [ _  _ ] => setoid_rewrite subset_spec in H
174
    | context [ _   ] => setoid_rewrite elem_of_equiv_empty in H
175
    | context [ _  _ ] => setoid_rewrite elem_of_equiv_alt in H
176
177
    | context [ _ =  ] => setoid_rewrite elem_of_equiv_empty_L in H
    | context [ _ = _ ] => setoid_rewrite elem_of_equiv_alt_L in H
178
179
180
181
182
    | context [ _   ] => setoid_rewrite elem_of_empty in H
    | context [ _  {[ _ ]} ] => setoid_rewrite elem_of_singleton in H
    | context [ _  _  _ ] => setoid_rewrite elem_of_union in H
    | context [ _  _  _ ] => setoid_rewrite elem_of_intersection in H
    | context [ _  _  _ ] => setoid_rewrite elem_of_difference in H
183
184
185
186
    | context [ _  _ <$> _ ] => setoid_rewrite elem_of_fmap in H
    | context [ _  mret _ ] => setoid_rewrite elem_of_ret in H
    | context [ _  _ = _ ] => setoid_rewrite elem_of_bind in H
    | context [ _  mjoin _ ] => setoid_rewrite elem_of_join in H
187
    | context [ _  guard _; _ ] => setoid_rewrite elem_of_guard in H
188
189
    end);
  repeat match goal with
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
190
  | |- context [ _  _ ] => setoid_rewrite elem_of_subseteq
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
191
  | |- context [ _  _ ] => setoid_rewrite subset_spec
192
  | |- context [ _   ] => setoid_rewrite elem_of_equiv_empty
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
193
  | |- context [ _  _ ] => setoid_rewrite elem_of_equiv_alt
194
195
  | |- context [ _ =  ] => setoid_rewrite elem_of_equiv_empty_L
  | |- context [ _ = _ ] => setoid_rewrite elem_of_equiv_alt_L
196
  | |- context [ _   ] => setoid_rewrite elem_of_empty
197
  | |- context [ _  {[ _ ]} ] => setoid_rewrite elem_of_singleton
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
198
199
200
  | |- context [ _  _  _ ] => setoid_rewrite elem_of_union
  | |- context [ _  _  _ ] => setoid_rewrite elem_of_intersection
  | |- context [ _  _  _ ] => setoid_rewrite elem_of_difference
201
202
203
204
  | |- context [ _  _ <$> _ ] => setoid_rewrite elem_of_fmap
  | |- context [ _  mret _ ] => setoid_rewrite elem_of_ret
  | |- context [ _  _ = _ ] => setoid_rewrite elem_of_bind
  | |- context [ _  mjoin _ ] => setoid_rewrite elem_of_join
205
  | |- context [ _  guard _; _ ] => setoid_rewrite elem_of_guard
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
206
207
  end.

208
209
210
(** The tactic [solve_elem_of tac] composes the above tactic with [intuition].
For goals that do not involve [≡], [⊆], [map], or quantifiers this tactic is
generally powerful enough. This tactic either fails or proves the goal. *)
211
Tactic Notation "solve_elem_of" tactic3(tac) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
212
  simpl in *;
213
  decompose_empty;
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
  unfold_elem_of;
  solve [intuition (simplify_equality; tac)].
Tactic Notation "solve_elem_of" := solve_elem_of auto.

(** For goals with quantifiers we could use the above tactic but with
[firstorder] instead of [intuition] as finishing tactic. However, [firstorder]
fails or loops on very small goals generated by [solve_elem_of] already. We
use the [naive_solver] tactic as a substitute. This tactic either fails or
proves the goal. *)
223
Tactic Notation "esolve_elem_of" tactic3(tac) :=
224
  simpl in *;
225
  decompose_empty;
226
227
228
  unfold_elem_of;
  naive_solver tac.
Tactic Notation "esolve_elem_of" := esolve_elem_of eauto.
229
230
 
(** * More theorems *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
231
232
233
Section collection.
  Context `{Collection A C}.

234
  Global Instance: Lattice C.
235
  Proof. split. apply _. firstorder auto. solve_elem_of. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
  Lemma intersection_singletons x : {[x]}  {[x]}  {[x]}.
  Proof. esolve_elem_of. Qed.
  Lemma difference_twice X Y : (X  Y)  Y  X  Y.
  Proof. esolve_elem_of. Qed.
  Lemma empty_difference X Y : X  Y  X  Y  .
  Proof. esolve_elem_of. Qed.
  Lemma difference_diag X : X  X  .
  Proof. esolve_elem_of. Qed.
  Lemma difference_union_distr_l X Y Z : (X  Y)  Z  X  Z  Y  Z.
  Proof. esolve_elem_of. Qed.
  Lemma difference_intersection_distr_l X Y Z : (X  Y)  Z  X  Z  Y  Z.
  Proof. esolve_elem_of. Qed.

249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
  Section leibniz.
    Context `{!LeibnizEquiv C}.
    Lemma intersection_singletons_L x : {[x]}  {[x]} = {[x]}.
    Proof. unfold_leibniz. apply intersection_singletons. Qed.
    Lemma difference_twice_L X Y : (X  Y)  Y = X  Y.
    Proof. unfold_leibniz. apply difference_twice. Qed.
    Lemma empty_difference_L X Y : X  Y  X  Y = .
    Proof. unfold_leibniz. apply empty_difference. Qed.
    Lemma difference_diag_L X : X  X = .
    Proof. unfold_leibniz. apply difference_diag. Qed.
    Lemma difference_union_distr_l_L X Y Z : (X  Y)  Z = X  Z  Y  Z.
    Proof. unfold_leibniz. apply difference_union_distr_l. Qed.
    Lemma difference_intersection_distr_l_L X Y Z :
      (X  Y)  Z = X  Z  Y  Z.
    Proof. unfold_leibniz. apply difference_intersection_distr_l. Qed.
  End leibniz.

  Section dec.
    Context `{ X Y : C, Decision (X  Y)}.
    Lemma not_elem_of_intersection x X Y : x  X  Y  x  X  x  Y.
269
    Proof. rewrite elem_of_intersection. destruct (decide (x  X)); tauto. Qed.
270
    Lemma not_elem_of_difference x X Y : x  X  Y  x  X  x  Y.
271
    Proof. rewrite elem_of_difference. destruct (decide (x  Y)); tauto. Qed.
272
273
    Lemma union_difference X Y : X  Y  Y  X  Y  X.
    Proof.
274
275
      split; intros x; rewrite !elem_of_union, elem_of_difference; [|intuition].
      destruct (decide (x  X)); intuition.
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
    Qed.
    Lemma non_empty_difference X Y : X  Y  Y  X  .
    Proof.
      intros [HXY1 HXY2] Hdiff. destruct HXY2. intros x.
      destruct (decide (x  X)); esolve_elem_of.
    Qed.

    Context `{!LeibnizEquiv C}.
    Lemma union_difference_L X Y : X  Y  Y = X  Y  X.
    Proof. unfold_leibniz. apply union_difference. Qed.
    Lemma non_empty_difference_L X Y : X  Y  Y  X  .
    Proof. unfold_leibniz. apply non_empty_difference. Qed.
  End dec.
End collection.

Section collection_ops.
  Context `{CollectionOps A C}.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
294
295
296
297
298
  Lemma elem_of_intersection_with_list (f : A  A  option A) Xs Y x :
    x  intersection_with_list f Y Xs   xs y,
      Forall2 () xs Xs  y  Y  foldr (λ x, (= f x)) (Some y) xs = Some x.
  Proof.
    split.
299
300
301
302
    * revert x. induction Xs; simpl; intros x HXs; [eexists [], x; intuition|].
      rewrite elem_of_intersection_with in HXs; destruct HXs as (x1&x2&?&?&?).
      destruct (IHXs x2) as (xs & y & hy & ? & ?); trivial.
      eexists (x1 :: xs), y. intuition (simplify_option_equality; auto).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
    * intros (xs & y & Hxs & ? & Hx). revert x Hx.
      induction Hxs; intros; simplify_option_equality; [done |].
      rewrite elem_of_intersection_with. naive_solver.
  Qed.

  Lemma intersection_with_list_ind (P Q : A  Prop) f Xs Y :
    ( y, y  Y  P y) 
    Forall (λ X,  x, x  X  Q x) Xs 
    ( x y z, Q x  P y  f x y = Some z  P z) 
     x, x  intersection_with_list f Y Xs  P x.
  Proof.
314
    intros HY HXs Hf. induction Xs; simplify_option_equality; [done |].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
315
316
317
    intros x Hx. rewrite elem_of_intersection_with in Hx.
    decompose_Forall. destruct Hx as (? & ? & ? & ? & ?). eauto.
  Qed.
318
End collection_ops.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
319

320
(** * Sets without duplicates up to an equivalence *)
321
Section NoDup.
322
  Context `{SimpleCollection A B} (R : relation A) `{!Equivalence R}.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
323
324

  Definition elem_of_upto (x : A) (X : B) :=  y, y  X  R x y.
325
  Definition set_NoDup (X : B) :=  x y, x  X  y  X  R x y  x = y.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
326
327

  Global Instance: Proper (() ==> iff) (elem_of_upto x).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
328
  Proof. intros ??? E. unfold elem_of_upto. by setoid_rewrite E. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
329
330
331
  Global Instance: Proper (R ==> () ==> iff) elem_of_upto.
  Proof.
    intros ?? E1 ?? E2. split; intros [z [??]]; exists z.
332
333
    * rewrite <-E1, <-E2; intuition.
    * rewrite E1, E2; intuition.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
334
  Qed.
335
  Global Instance: Proper (() ==> iff) set_NoDup.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
336
337
338
  Proof. firstorder. Qed.

  Lemma elem_of_upto_elem_of x X : x  X  elem_of_upto x X.
339
  Proof. unfold elem_of_upto. esolve_elem_of. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
340
  Lemma elem_of_upto_empty x : ¬elem_of_upto x .
341
  Proof. unfold elem_of_upto. esolve_elem_of. Qed.
342
  Lemma elem_of_upto_singleton x y : elem_of_upto x {[ y ]}  R x y.
343
  Proof. unfold elem_of_upto. esolve_elem_of. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
344

345
346
  Lemma elem_of_upto_union X Y x :
    elem_of_upto x (X  Y)  elem_of_upto x X  elem_of_upto x Y.
347
  Proof. unfold elem_of_upto. esolve_elem_of. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
348
  Lemma not_elem_of_upto x X : ¬elem_of_upto x X   y, y  X  ¬R x y.
349
  Proof. unfold elem_of_upto. esolve_elem_of. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
350

351
352
353
354
355
356
357
  Lemma set_NoDup_empty: set_NoDup .
  Proof. unfold set_NoDup. solve_elem_of. Qed.
  Lemma set_NoDup_add x X :
    ¬elem_of_upto x X  set_NoDup X  set_NoDup ({[ x ]}  X).
  Proof. unfold set_NoDup, elem_of_upto. esolve_elem_of. Qed.
  Lemma set_NoDup_inv_add x X :
    x  X  set_NoDup ({[ x ]}  X)  ¬elem_of_upto x X.
358
359
  Proof.
    intros Hin Hnodup [y [??]].
360
    rewrite (Hnodup x y) in Hin; solve_elem_of.
361
  Qed.
362
363
364
365
366
  Lemma set_NoDup_inv_union_l X Y : set_NoDup (X  Y)  set_NoDup X.
  Proof. unfold set_NoDup. solve_elem_of. Qed.
  Lemma set_NoDup_inv_union_r X Y : set_NoDup (X  Y)  set_NoDup Y.
  Proof. unfold set_NoDup. solve_elem_of. Qed.
End NoDup.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
367

368
(** * Quantifiers *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
369
Section quantifiers.
370
  Context `{SimpleCollection A B} (P : A  Prop).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
371

372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
  Definition set_Forall X :=  x, x  X  P x.
  Definition set_Exists X :=  x, x  X  P x.

  Lemma set_Forall_empty : set_Forall .
  Proof. unfold set_Forall. solve_elem_of. Qed.
  Lemma set_Forall_singleton x : set_Forall {[ x ]}  P x.
  Proof. unfold set_Forall. solve_elem_of. Qed.
  Lemma set_Forall_union X Y : set_Forall X  set_Forall Y  set_Forall (X  Y).
  Proof. unfold set_Forall. solve_elem_of. Qed.
  Lemma set_Forall_union_inv_1 X Y : set_Forall (X  Y)  set_Forall X.
  Proof. unfold set_Forall. solve_elem_of. Qed.
  Lemma set_Forall_union_inv_2 X Y : set_Forall (X  Y)  set_Forall Y.
  Proof. unfold set_Forall. solve_elem_of. Qed.

  Lemma set_Exists_empty : ¬set_Exists .
  Proof. unfold set_Exists. esolve_elem_of. Qed.
  Lemma set_Exists_singleton x : set_Exists {[ x ]}  P x.
  Proof. unfold set_Exists. esolve_elem_of. Qed.
  Lemma set_Exists_union_1 X Y : set_Exists X  set_Exists (X  Y).
  Proof. unfold set_Exists. esolve_elem_of. Qed.
  Lemma set_Exists_union_2 X Y : set_Exists Y  set_Exists (X  Y).
  Proof. unfold set_Exists. esolve_elem_of. Qed.
  Lemma set_Exists_union_inv X Y :
    set_Exists (X  Y)  set_Exists X  set_Exists Y.
  Proof. unfold set_Exists. esolve_elem_of. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
397
398
End quantifiers.

399
Section more_quantifiers.
400
  Context `{SimpleCollection A B}.
401

402
403
404
405
406
407
  Lemma set_Forall_weaken (P Q : A  Prop) (Hweaken :  x, P x  Q x) X :
    set_Forall P X  set_Forall Q X.
  Proof. unfold set_Forall. naive_solver. Qed.
  Lemma set_Exists_weaken (P Q : A  Prop) (Hweaken :  x, P x  Q x) X :
    set_Exists P X  set_Exists Q X.
  Proof. unfold set_Exists. naive_solver. Qed.
408
409
End more_quantifiers.

410
411
412
(** * Fresh elements *)
(** We collect some properties on the [fresh] operation. In particular we
generalize [fresh] to generate lists of fresh elements. *)
413
Section fresh.
414
  Context `{FreshSpec A C} .
415

416
417
418
419
  Definition fresh_sig (X : C) : { x : A | x  X } :=
    exist ( X) (fresh X) (is_fresh X).

  Global Instance fresh_proper: Proper (() ==> (=)) fresh.
420
  Proof. intros ???. by apply fresh_proper_alt, elem_of_equiv. Qed.
421

422
423
424
425
426
427
  Fixpoint fresh_list (n : nat) (X : C) : list A :=
    match n with
    | 0 => []
    | S n => let x := fresh X in x :: fresh_list n ({[ x ]}  X)
    end.

428
429
  Global Instance fresh_list_proper: Proper ((=) ==> () ==> (=)) fresh_list.
  Proof.
430
431
    intros ? n ->. induction n as [|n IH]; intros ?? E; f_equal'; [by rewrite E|].
    apply IH. by rewrite E.
432
  Qed.
433
434
  Lemma fresh_list_length n X : length (fresh_list n X) = n.
  Proof. revert X. induction n; simpl; auto. Qed.
435
  Lemma fresh_list_is_fresh n X x : x  fresh_list n X  x  X.
436
  Proof.
437
438
439
    revert X. induction n as [|n IH]; intros X; simpl; [by rewrite elem_of_nil|].
    rewrite elem_of_cons; intros [->| Hin]; [apply is_fresh|].
    apply IH in Hin; solve_elem_of.
440
441
442
  Qed.
  Lemma fresh_list_nodup n X : NoDup (fresh_list n X).
  Proof.
443
444
    revert X. induction n; simpl; constructor; auto.
    intros Hin. apply fresh_list_is_fresh in Hin. solve_elem_of.
445
446
  Qed.
End fresh.
447

448
(** * Properties of implementations of collections that form a monad *)
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
Section collection_monad.
  Context `{CollectionMonad M}.

  Global Instance collection_fmap_proper {A B} (f : A  B) :
    Proper (() ==> ()) (fmap f).
  Proof. intros X Y E. esolve_elem_of. Qed.
  Global Instance collection_ret_proper {A} :
    Proper ((=) ==> ()) (@mret M _ A).
  Proof. intros X Y E. esolve_elem_of. Qed.
  Global Instance collection_bind_proper {A B} (f : A  M B) :
    Proper (() ==> ()) (mbind f).
  Proof. intros X Y E. esolve_elem_of. Qed.
  Global Instance collection_join_proper {A} :
    Proper (() ==> ()) (@mjoin M _ A).
  Proof. intros X Y E. esolve_elem_of. Qed.

  Lemma collection_fmap_compose {A B C} (f : A  B) (g : B  C) X :
    g  f <$> X  g <$> (f <$> X).
  Proof. esolve_elem_of. Qed.
  Lemma elem_of_fmap_1 {A B} (f : A  B) (X : M A) (y : B) :
    y  f <$> X   x, y = f x  x  X.
  Proof. esolve_elem_of. Qed.
  Lemma elem_of_fmap_2 {A B} (f : A  B) (X : M A) (x : A) :
    x  X  f x  f <$> X.
  Proof. esolve_elem_of. Qed.
  Lemma elem_of_fmap_2_alt {A B} (f : A  B) (X : M A) (x : A) (y : B) :
    x  X  y = f x  y  f <$> X.
  Proof. esolve_elem_of. Qed.

  Lemma elem_of_mapM {A B} (f : A  M B) l k :
    l  mapM f k  Forall2 (λ x y, x  f y) l k.
  Proof.
    split.
    * revert l. induction k; esolve_elem_of.
    * induction 1; esolve_elem_of.
  Qed.
485
  Lemma collection_mapM_length {A B} (f : A  M B) l k :
486
487
488
    l  mapM f k  length l = length k.
  Proof. revert l; induction k; esolve_elem_of. Qed.
  Lemma elem_of_mapM_fmap {A B} (f : A  B) (g : B  M A) l k :
489
    Forall (λ x,  y, y  g x  f y = x) l  k  mapM g l  fmap f k = l.
490
  Proof.
491
492
    intros Hl. revert k. induction Hl; simpl; intros;
      decompose_elem_of; f_equal'; auto.
493
494
  Qed.
  Lemma elem_of_mapM_Forall {A B} (f : A  M B) (P : B  Prop) l k :
495
    l  mapM f k  Forall (λ x,  y, y  f x  P y) k  Forall P l.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
496
  Proof. rewrite elem_of_mapM. apply Forall2_Forall_l. Qed.
497
498
  Lemma elem_of_mapM_Forall2_l {A B C} (f : A  M B) (P: B  C  Prop) l1 l2 k :
    l1  mapM f k  Forall2 (λ x y,  z, z  f x  P z y) k l2 
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
499
500
501
502
503
    Forall2 P l1 l2.
  Proof.
    rewrite elem_of_mapM. intros Hl1. revert l2.
    induction Hl1; inversion_clear 1; constructor; auto.
  Qed.
504
End collection_monad.