base.v 54.5 KB
Newer Older
1
(* Copyright (c) 2012-2019, Coq-std++ developers. *)
2 3 4
(* This file is distributed under the terms of the BSD license. *)
(** This file collects type class interfaces, notations, and general theorems
that are used throughout the whole development. Most importantly it contains
5
abstract interfaces for ordered structures, sets, and various other data
6
structures. *)
7

8
From Coq Require Export Morphisms RelationClasses List Bool Utf8 Setoid.
9
Set Default Proof Using "Type".
10 11
Export ListNotations.
From Coq.Program Require Export Basics Syntax.
12

Ralf Jung's avatar
Ralf Jung committed
13 14
(** * Enable implicit generalization. *)
(** This option enables implicit generalization in arguments of the form
15 16 17 18 19 20
   `{...} (i.e., anonymous arguments).  Unfortunately, it also enables
   implicit generalization in `Instance`.  We think that the fact taht both
   behaviors are coupled together is a [bug in
   Coq](https://github.com/coq/coq/issues/6030). *)
Global Generalizable All Variables.

21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35
(** * Tweak program *)
(** 1. Since we only use Program to solve logical side-conditions, they should
always be made Opaque, otherwise we end up with performance problems due to
Coq blindly unfolding them.

Note that in most cases we use [Next Obligation. (* ... *) Qed.], for which
this option does not matter. However, sometimes we write things like
[Solve Obligations with naive_solver (* ... *)], and then the obligations
should surely be opaque. *)
Global Unset Transparent Obligations.

(** 2. Do not let Program automatically simplify obligations. The default
obligation tactic is [Tactics.program_simpl], which, among other things,
introduces all variables and gives them fresh names. As such, it becomes
impossible to refer to hypotheses in a robust way. *)
36
Obligation Tactic := idtac.
37 38

(** 3. Hide obligations from the results of the [Search] commands. *)
39
Add Search Blacklist "_obligation_".
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
40

41
(** * Sealing off definitions *)
Ralf Jung's avatar
Ralf Jung committed
42 43 44 45
Section seal.
  Local Set Primitive Projections.
  Record seal {A} (f : A) := { unseal : A; seal_eq : unseal = f }.
End seal.
Ralf Jung's avatar
Ralf Jung committed
46 47
Arguments unseal {_ _} _ : assert.
Arguments seal_eq {_ _} _ : assert.
48

49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64
(** * Non-backtracking type classes *)
(** The type class [NoBackTrack P] can be used to establish [P] without ever
backtracking on the instance of [P] that has been found. Backtracking may
normally happen when [P] contains evars that could be instanciated in different
ways depending on which instance is picked, and type class search somewhere else
depends on this evar.

The proper way of handling this would be by setting Coq's option
`Typeclasses Unique Instances`. However, this option seems to be broken, see Coq
issue #6714.

See https://gitlab.mpi-sws.org/FP/iris-coq/merge_requests/112 for a rationale
of this type class. *)
Class NoBackTrack (P : Prop) := { no_backtrack : P }.
Hint Extern 0 (NoBackTrack _) => constructor; apply _ : typeclass_instances.

65 66 67 68
(* A conditional at the type class level. Note that [TCIf P Q R] is not the same
as [TCOr (TCAnd P Q) R]: the latter will backtrack to [R] if it fails to
establish [R], i.e. does not have the behavior of a conditional. Furthermore,
note that [TCOr (TCAnd P Q) (TCAnd (TCNot P) R)] would not work; we generally
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
69
would not be able to prove the negation of [P]. *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
70
Inductive TCIf (P Q R : Prop) : Prop :=
71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78
  | TCIf_true : P  Q  TCIf P Q R
  | TCIf_false : R  TCIf P Q R.
Existing Class TCIf.

Hint Extern 0 (TCIf _ _ _) =>
  first [apply TCIf_true; [apply _|]
        |apply TCIf_false] : typeclass_instances.

79
(** * Typeclass opaque definitions *)
Ralf Jung's avatar
Ralf Jung committed
80
(** The constant [tc_opaque] is used to make definitions opaque for just type
81 82 83 84 85
class search. Note that [simpl] is set up to always unfold [tc_opaque]. *)
Definition tc_opaque {A} (x : A) : A := x.
Typeclasses Opaque tc_opaque.
Arguments tc_opaque {_} _ /.

Ralf Jung's avatar
Ralf Jung committed
86
(** Below we define type class versions of the common logical operators. It is
87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101
important to note that we duplicate the definitions, and do not declare the
existing logical operators as type classes. That is, we do not say:

  Existing Class or.
  Existing Class and.

If we could define the existing logical operators as classes, there is no way
of disambiguating whether a premise of a lemma should be solved by type class
resolution or not.

These classes are useful for two purposes: writing complicated type class
premises in a more concise way, and for efficiency. For example, using the [Or]
class, instead of defining two instances [P → Q1 → R] and [P → Q2 → R] we could
have one instance [P → Or Q1 Q2 → R]. When we declare the instance that way, we
avoid the need to derive [P] twice. *)
102
Inductive TCOr (P1 P2 : Prop) : Prop :=
103 104 105 106 107
  | TCOr_l : P1  TCOr P1 P2
  | TCOr_r : P2  TCOr P1 P2.
Existing Class TCOr.
Existing Instance TCOr_l | 9.
Existing Instance TCOr_r | 10.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
108

109
Inductive TCAnd (P1 P2 : Prop) : Prop := TCAnd_intro : P1  P2  TCAnd P1 P2.
110 111
Existing Class TCAnd.
Existing Instance TCAnd_intro.
112

113 114 115
Inductive TCTrue : Prop := TCTrue_intro : TCTrue.
Existing Class TCTrue.
Existing Instance TCTrue_intro.
116

117 118 119 120 121 122 123
Inductive TCForall {A} (P : A  Prop) : list A  Prop :=
  | TCForall_nil : TCForall P []
  | TCForall_cons x xs : P x  TCForall P xs  TCForall P (x :: xs).
Existing Class TCForall.
Existing Instance TCForall_nil.
Existing Instance TCForall_cons.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131
Inductive TCForall2 {A B} (P : A  B  Prop) : list A  list B  Prop :=
  | TCForall2_nil : TCForall2 P [] []
  | TCForall2_cons x y xs ys :
     P x y  TCForall2 P xs ys  TCForall2 P (x :: xs) (y :: ys).
Existing Class TCForall2.
Existing Instance TCForall2_nil.
Existing Instance TCForall2_cons.

132 133 134 135 136 137 138
Inductive TCElemOf {A} (x : A) : list A  Prop :=
  | TCElemOf_here xs : TCElemOf x (x :: xs)
  | TCElemOf_further y xs : TCElemOf x xs  TCElemOf x (y :: xs).
Existing Class TCElemOf.
Existing Instance TCElemOf_here.
Existing Instance TCElemOf_further.

139 140 141 142
Inductive TCEq {A} (x : A) : A  Prop := TCEq_refl : TCEq x x.
Existing Class TCEq.
Existing Instance TCEq_refl.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
143 144 145 146 147
Inductive TCDiag {A} (C : A  Prop) : A  A  Prop :=
  | TCDiag_diag x : C x  TCDiag C x x.
Existing Class TCDiag.
Existing Instance TCDiag_diag.

148 149 150 151 152 153
(** Given a proposition [P] that is a type class, [tc_to_bool P] will return
[true] iff there is an instance of [P]. It is often useful in Ltac programming,
where one can do [lazymatch tc_to_bool P with true => .. | false => .. end]. *)
Definition tc_to_bool (P : Prop)
  {p : bool} `{TCIf P (TCEq p true) (TCEq p false)} : bool := p.

154
(** Throughout this development we use [stdpp_scope] for all general purpose
155
notations that do not belong to a more specific scope. *)
156 157
Delimit Scope stdpp_scope with stdpp.
Global Open Scope stdpp_scope.
158

159
(** Change [True] and [False] into notations in order to enable overloading.
160 161
We will use this to give [True] and [False] a different interpretation for
embedded logics. *)
162 163
Notation "'True'" := True (format "True") : type_scope.
Notation "'False'" := False (format "False") : type_scope.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
164 165


166
(** * Equality *)
167
(** Introduce some Haskell style like notations. *)
168 169 170 171 172 173
Notation "(=)" := eq (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "( x =)" := (eq x) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(= x )" := (λ y, eq y x) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(≠)" := (λ x y, x  y) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "( x ≠)" := (λ y, x  y) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(≠ x )" := (λ y, y  x) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
174

175 176 177 178
Infix "=@{ A }" := (@eq A)
  (at level 70, only parsing, no associativity) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(=@{ A } )" := (@eq A) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(≠@{ A } )" := (λ X Y, ¬X =@{A} Y) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
179 180
Notation "X ≠@{ A } Y":= (¬X =@{ A } Y)
  (at level 70, only parsing, no associativity) : stdpp_scope.
181

Tej Chajed's avatar
Tej Chajed committed
182 183
Hint Extern 0 (_ = _) => reflexivity : core.
Hint Extern 100 (_  _) => discriminate : core.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
184

185
Instance:  A, PreOrder (=@{A}).
186 187 188
Proof. split; repeat intro; congruence. Qed.

(** ** Setoid equality *)
Ralf Jung's avatar
Ralf Jung committed
189 190 191
(** We define an operational type class for setoid equality, i.e., the
"canonical" equivalence for a type. The typeclass is tied to the \equiv
symbol. This is based on (Spitters/van der Weegen, 2011). *)
192
Class Equiv A := equiv: relation A.
193 194 195
(* No Hint Mode set because of Coq bug #5735
Hint Mode Equiv ! : typeclass_instances. *)

196
Infix "≡" := equiv (at level 70, no associativity) : stdpp_scope.
197 198 199
Infix "≡@{ A }" := (@equiv A _)
  (at level 70, only parsing, no associativity) : stdpp_scope.

200 201 202 203 204 205 206
Notation "(≡)" := equiv (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "( X ≡)" := (equiv X) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(≡ X )" := (λ Y, Y  X) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(≢)" := (λ X Y, ¬X  Y) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "X ≢ Y":= (¬X  Y) (at level 70, no associativity) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "( X ≢)" := (λ Y, X  Y) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(≢ X )" := (λ Y, Y  X) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
207

208 209
Notation "(≡@{ A } )" := (@equiv A _) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(≢@{ A } )" := (λ X Y, ¬X @{A} Y) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
210 211
Notation "X ≢@{ A } Y":= (¬X @{ A } Y)
  (at level 70, only parsing, no associativity) : stdpp_scope.
212

213 214 215 216 217
(** The type class [LeibnizEquiv] collects setoid equalities that coincide
with Leibniz equality. We provide the tactic [fold_leibniz] to transform such
setoid equalities into Leibniz equalities, and [unfold_leibniz] for the
reverse. *)
Class LeibnizEquiv A `{Equiv A} := leibniz_equiv x y : x  y  x = y.
218 219
Hint Mode LeibnizEquiv ! - : typeclass_instances.

220
Lemma leibniz_equiv_iff `{LeibnizEquiv A, !Reflexive (@{A})} (x y : A) :
221 222
  x  y  x = y.
Proof. split. apply leibniz_equiv. intros ->; reflexivity. Qed.
223

224 225
Ltac fold_leibniz := repeat
  match goal with
226
  | H : context [ _ @{?A} _ ] |- _ =>
227
    setoid_rewrite (leibniz_equiv_iff (A:=A)) in H
228
  | |- context [ _ @{?A} _ ] =>
229 230 231 232
    setoid_rewrite (leibniz_equiv_iff (A:=A))
  end.
Ltac unfold_leibniz := repeat
  match goal with
233
  | H : context [ _ =@{?A} _ ] |- _ =>
234
    setoid_rewrite <-(leibniz_equiv_iff (A:=A)) in H
235
  | |- context [ _ =@{?A} _ ] =>
236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243
    setoid_rewrite <-(leibniz_equiv_iff (A:=A))
  end.

Definition equivL {A} : Equiv A := (=).

(** A [Params f n] instance forces the setoid rewriting mechanism not to
rewrite in the first [n] arguments of the function [f]. We will declare such
instances for all operational type classes in this development. *)
244
Instance: Params (@equiv) 2 := {}.
245 246 247 248

(** The following instance forces [setoid_replace] to use setoid equality
(for types that have an [Equiv] instance) rather than the standard Leibniz
equality. *)
249
Instance equiv_default_relation `{Equiv A} : DefaultRelation () | 3 := {}.
Tej Chajed's avatar
Tej Chajed committed
250 251
Hint Extern 0 (_  _) => reflexivity : core.
Hint Extern 0 (_  _) => symmetry; assumption : core.
252 253 254 255 256


(** * Type classes *)
(** ** Decidable propositions *)
(** This type class by (Spitters/van der Weegen, 2011) collects decidable
257
propositions. *)
258
Class Decision (P : Prop) := decide : {P} + {¬P}.
259
Hint Mode Decision ! : typeclass_instances.
260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279
Arguments decide _ {_} : simpl never, assert.

(** Although [RelDecision R] is just [∀ x y, Decision (R x y)], we make this
an explicit class instead of a notation for two reasons:

- It allows us to control [Hint Mode] more precisely. In particular, if it were
  defined as a notation, the above [Hint Mode] for [Decision] would not prevent
  diverging instance search when looking for [RelDecision (@eq ?A)], which would
  result in it looking for [Decision (@eq ?A x y)], i.e. an instance where the
  head position of [Decision] is not en evar.
- We use it to avoid inefficient computation due to eager evaluation of
  propositions by [vm_compute]. This inefficiency arises for example if
  [(x = y) := (f x = f y)]. Since [decide (x = y)] evaluates to
  [decide (f x = f y)], this would then lead to evaluation of [f x] and [f y].
  Using the [RelDecision], the [f] is hidden under a lambda, which prevents
  unnecessary evaluation. *)
Class RelDecision {A B} (R : A  B  Prop) :=
  decide_rel x y :> Decision (R x y).
Hint Mode RelDecision ! ! ! : typeclass_instances.
Arguments decide_rel {_ _} _ {_} _ _ : simpl never, assert.
280
Notation EqDecision A := (RelDecision (=@{A})).
281 282 283 284

(** ** Inhabited types *)
(** This type class collects types that are inhabited. *)
Class Inhabited (A : Type) : Type := populate { inhabitant : A }.
285
Hint Mode Inhabited ! : typeclass_instances.
286
Arguments populate {_} _ : assert.
287 288 289 290 291 292

(** ** Proof irrelevant types *)
(** This type class collects types that are proof irrelevant. That means, all
elements of the type are equal. We use this notion only used for propositions,
but by universe polymorphism we can generalize it. *)
Class ProofIrrel (A : Type) : Prop := proof_irrel (x y : A) : x = y.
293
Hint Mode ProofIrrel ! : typeclass_instances.
294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329

(** ** Common properties *)
(** These operational type classes allow us to refer to common mathematical
properties in a generic way. For example, for injectivity of [(k ++)] it
allows us to write [inj (k ++)] instead of [app_inv_head k]. *)
Class Inj {A B} (R : relation A) (S : relation B) (f : A  B) : Prop :=
  inj x y : S (f x) (f y)  R x y.
Class Inj2 {A B C} (R1 : relation A) (R2 : relation B)
    (S : relation C) (f : A  B  C) : Prop :=
  inj2 x1 x2 y1 y2 : S (f x1 x2) (f y1 y2)  R1 x1 y1  R2 x2 y2.
Class Cancel {A B} (S : relation B) (f : A  B) (g : B  A) : Prop :=
  cancel :  x, S (f (g x)) x.
Class Surj {A B} (R : relation B) (f : A  B) :=
  surj y :  x, R (f x) y.
Class IdemP {A} (R : relation A) (f : A  A  A) : Prop :=
  idemp x : R (f x x) x.
Class Comm {A B} (R : relation A) (f : B  B  A) : Prop :=
  comm x y : R (f x y) (f y x).
Class LeftId {A} (R : relation A) (i : A) (f : A  A  A) : Prop :=
  left_id x : R (f i x) x.
Class RightId {A} (R : relation A) (i : A) (f : A  A  A) : Prop :=
  right_id x : R (f x i) x.
Class Assoc {A} (R : relation A) (f : A  A  A) : Prop :=
  assoc x y z : R (f x (f y z)) (f (f x y) z).
Class LeftAbsorb {A} (R : relation A) (i : A) (f : A  A  A) : Prop :=
  left_absorb x : R (f i x) i.
Class RightAbsorb {A} (R : relation A) (i : A) (f : A  A  A) : Prop :=
  right_absorb x : R (f x i) i.
Class AntiSymm {A} (R S : relation A) : Prop :=
  anti_symm x y : S x y  S y x  R x y.
Class Total {A} (R : relation A) := total x y : R x y  R y x.
Class Trichotomy {A} (R : relation A) :=
  trichotomy x y : R x y  x = y  R y x.
Class TrichotomyT {A} (R : relation A) :=
  trichotomyT x y : {R x y} + {x = y} + {R y x}.

330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345
Arguments irreflexivity {_} _ {_} _ _ : assert.
Arguments inj {_ _ _ _} _ {_} _ _ _ : assert.
Arguments inj2 {_ _ _ _ _ _} _ {_} _ _ _ _ _: assert.
Arguments cancel {_ _ _} _ _ {_} _ : assert.
Arguments surj {_ _ _} _ {_} _ : assert.
Arguments idemp {_ _} _ {_} _ : assert.
Arguments comm {_ _ _} _ {_} _ _ : assert.
Arguments left_id {_ _} _ _ {_} _ : assert.
Arguments right_id {_ _} _ _ {_} _ : assert.
Arguments assoc {_ _} _ {_} _ _ _ : assert.
Arguments left_absorb {_ _} _ _ {_} _ : assert.
Arguments right_absorb {_ _} _ _ {_} _ : assert.
Arguments anti_symm {_ _} _ {_} _ _ _ _ : assert.
Arguments total {_} _ {_} _ _ : assert.
Arguments trichotomy {_} _ {_} _ _ : assert.
Arguments trichotomyT {_} _ {_} _ _ : assert.
346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398

Lemma not_symmetry `{R : relation A, !Symmetric R} x y : ¬R x y  ¬R y x.
Proof. intuition. Qed.
Lemma symmetry_iff `(R : relation A) `{!Symmetric R} x y : R x y  R y x.
Proof. intuition. Qed.

Lemma not_inj `{Inj A B R R' f} x y : ¬R x y  ¬R' (f x) (f y).
Proof. intuition. Qed.
Lemma not_inj2_1 `{Inj2 A B C R R' R'' f} x1 x2 y1 y2 :
  ¬R x1 x2  ¬R'' (f x1 y1) (f x2 y2).
Proof. intros HR HR''. destruct (inj2 f x1 y1 x2 y2); auto. Qed.
Lemma not_inj2_2 `{Inj2 A B C R R' R'' f} x1 x2 y1 y2 :
  ¬R' y1 y2  ¬R'' (f x1 y1) (f x2 y2).
Proof. intros HR' HR''. destruct (inj2 f x1 y1 x2 y2); auto. Qed.

Lemma inj_iff {A B} {R : relation A} {S : relation B} (f : A  B)
  `{!Inj R S f} `{!Proper (R ==> S) f} x y : S (f x) (f y)  R x y.
Proof. firstorder. Qed.
Instance inj2_inj_1 `{Inj2 A B C R1 R2 R3 f} y : Inj R1 R3 (λ x, f x y).
Proof. repeat intro; edestruct (inj2 f); eauto. Qed.
Instance inj2_inj_2 `{Inj2 A B C R1 R2 R3 f} x : Inj R2 R3 (f x).
Proof. repeat intro; edestruct (inj2 f); eauto. Qed.

Lemma cancel_inj `{Cancel A B R1 f g, !Equivalence R1, !Proper (R2 ==> R1) f} :
  Inj R1 R2 g.
Proof.
  intros x y E. rewrite <-(cancel f g x), <-(cancel f g y), E. reflexivity.
Qed.
Lemma cancel_surj `{Cancel A B R1 f g} : Surj R1 f.
Proof. intros y. exists (g y). auto. Qed.

(** The following lemmas are specific versions of the projections of the above
type classes for Leibniz equality. These lemmas allow us to enforce Coq not to
use the setoid rewriting mechanism. *)
Lemma idemp_L {A} f `{!@IdemP A (=) f} x : f x x = x.
Proof. auto. Qed.
Lemma comm_L {A B} f `{!@Comm A B (=) f} x y : f x y = f y x.
Proof. auto. Qed.
Lemma left_id_L {A} i f `{!@LeftId A (=) i f} x : f i x = x.
Proof. auto. Qed.
Lemma right_id_L {A} i f `{!@RightId A (=) i f} x : f x i = x.
Proof. auto. Qed.
Lemma assoc_L {A} f `{!@Assoc A (=) f} x y z : f x (f y z) = f (f x y) z.
Proof. auto. Qed.
Lemma left_absorb_L {A} i f `{!@LeftAbsorb A (=) i f} x : f i x = i.
Proof. auto. Qed.
Lemma right_absorb_L {A} i f `{!@RightAbsorb A (=) i f} x : f x i = i.
Proof. auto. Qed.

(** ** Generic orders *)
(** The classes [PreOrder], [PartialOrder], and [TotalOrder] use an arbitrary
relation [R] instead of [⊆] to support multiple orders on the same type. *)
Definition strict {A} (R : relation A) : relation A := λ X Y, R X Y  ¬R Y X.
399
Instance: Params (@strict) 2 := {}.
400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409
Class PartialOrder {A} (R : relation A) : Prop := {
  partial_order_pre :> PreOrder R;
  partial_order_anti_symm :> AntiSymm (=) R
}.
Class TotalOrder {A} (R : relation A) : Prop := {
  total_order_partial :> PartialOrder R;
  total_order_trichotomy :> Trichotomy (strict R)
}.

(** * Logic *)
410 411 412
Notation "(∧)" := and (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "( A ∧)" := (and A) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(∧ B )" := (λ A, A  B) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
413

414 415 416
Notation "(∨)" := or (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "( A ∨)" := (or A) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(∨ B )" := (λ A, A  B) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
417

418 419 420
Notation "(↔)" := iff (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "( A ↔)" := (iff A) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(↔ B )" := (λ A, A  B) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
421

Tej Chajed's avatar
Tej Chajed committed
422 423
Hint Extern 0 (_  _) => reflexivity : core.
Hint Extern 0 (_  _) => symmetry; assumption : core.
424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434

Lemma or_l P Q : ¬Q  P  Q  P.
Proof. tauto. Qed.
Lemma or_r P Q : ¬P  P  Q  Q.
Proof. tauto. Qed.
Lemma and_wlog_l (P Q : Prop) : (Q  P)  Q  (P  Q).
Proof. tauto. Qed.
Lemma and_wlog_r (P Q : Prop) : P  (P  Q)  (P  Q).
Proof. tauto. Qed.
Lemma impl_transitive (P Q R : Prop) : (P  Q)  (Q  R)  (P  R).
Proof. tauto. Qed.
435 436 437 438 439 440
Lemma forall_proper {A} (P Q : A  Prop) :
  ( x, P x  Q x)  ( x, P x)  ( x, Q x).
Proof. firstorder. Qed.
Lemma exist_proper {A} (P Q : A  Prop) :
  ( x, P x  Q x)  ( x, P x)  ( x, Q x).
Proof. firstorder. Qed.
441

442
Instance: Comm () (=@{A}).
443
Proof. red; intuition. Qed.
444
Instance: Comm () (λ x y, y =@{A} x).
445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483
Proof. red; intuition. Qed.
Instance: Comm () ().
Proof. red; intuition. Qed.
Instance: Comm () ().
Proof. red; intuition. Qed.
Instance: Assoc () ().
Proof. red; intuition. Qed.
Instance: IdemP () ().
Proof. red; intuition. Qed.
Instance: Comm () ().
Proof. red; intuition. Qed.
Instance: Assoc () ().
Proof. red; intuition. Qed.
Instance: IdemP () ().
Proof. red; intuition. Qed.
Instance: LeftId () True ().
Proof. red; intuition. Qed.
Instance: RightId () True ().
Proof. red; intuition. Qed.
Instance: LeftAbsorb () False ().
Proof. red; intuition. Qed.
Instance: RightAbsorb () False ().
Proof. red; intuition. Qed.
Instance: LeftId () False ().
Proof. red; intuition. Qed.
Instance: RightId () False ().
Proof. red; intuition. Qed.
Instance: LeftAbsorb () True ().
Proof. red; intuition. Qed.
Instance: RightAbsorb () True ().
Proof. red; intuition. Qed.
Instance: LeftId () True impl.
Proof. unfold impl. red; intuition. Qed.
Instance: RightAbsorb () True impl.
Proof. unfold impl. red; intuition. Qed.


(** * Common data types *)
(** ** Functions *)
484 485 486
Notation "(→)" := (λ A B, A  B) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "( A →)" := (λ B, A  B) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(→ B )" := (λ A, A  B) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
487

488
Notation "t $ r" := (t r)
489 490 491
  (at level 65, right associativity, only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "($)" := (λ f x, f x) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "($ x )" := (λ f, f x) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
492

493 494 495 496
Infix "∘" := compose : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(∘)" := compose (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "( f ∘)" := (compose f) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(∘ f )" := (λ g, compose g f) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
497

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
498 499 500
Instance impl_inhabited {A} `{Inhabited B} : Inhabited (A  B) :=
  populate (λ _, inhabitant).

501 502
(** Ensure that [simpl] unfolds [id], [compose], and [flip] when fully
applied. *)
503 504 505 506
Arguments id _ _ / : assert.
Arguments compose _ _ _ _ _ _ / : assert.
Arguments flip _ _ _ _ _ _ / : assert.
Arguments const _ _ _ _ / : assert.
507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554
Typeclasses Transparent id compose flip const.

Definition fun_map {A A' B B'} (f: A'  A) (g: B  B') (h : A  B) : A'  B' :=
  g  h  f.

Instance const_proper `{R1 : relation A, R2 : relation B} (x : B) :
  Reflexive R2  Proper (R1 ==> R2) (λ _, x).
Proof. intros ? y1 y2; reflexivity. Qed.

Instance id_inj {A} : Inj (=) (=) (@id A).
Proof. intros ??; auto. Qed.
Instance compose_inj {A B C} R1 R2 R3 (f : A  B) (g : B  C) :
  Inj R1 R2 f  Inj R2 R3 g  Inj R1 R3 (g  f).
Proof. red; intuition. Qed.

Instance id_surj {A} : Surj (=) (@id A).
Proof. intros y; exists y; reflexivity. Qed.
Instance compose_surj {A B C} R (f : A  B) (g : B  C) :
  Surj (=) f  Surj R g  Surj R (g  f).
Proof.
  intros ?? x. unfold compose. destruct (surj g x) as [y ?].
  destruct (surj f y) as [z ?]. exists z. congruence.
Qed.

Instance id_comm {A B} (x : B) : Comm (=) (λ _ _ : A, x).
Proof. intros ?; reflexivity. Qed.
Instance id_assoc {A} (x : A) : Assoc (=) (λ _ _ : A, x).
Proof. intros ???; reflexivity. Qed.
Instance const1_assoc {A} : Assoc (=) (λ x _ : A, x).
Proof. intros ???; reflexivity. Qed.
Instance const2_assoc {A} : Assoc (=) (λ _ x : A, x).
Proof. intros ???; reflexivity. Qed.
Instance const1_idemp {A} : IdemP (=) (λ x _ : A, x).
Proof. intros ?; reflexivity. Qed.
Instance const2_idemp {A} : IdemP (=) (λ _ x : A, x).
Proof. intros ?; reflexivity. Qed.

(** ** Lists *)
Instance list_inhabited {A} : Inhabited (list A) := populate [].

Definition zip_with {A B C} (f : A  B  C) : list A  list B  list C :=
  fix go l1 l2 :=
  match l1, l2 with x1 :: l1, x2 :: l2 => f x1 x2 :: go l1 l2 | _ , _ => [] end.
Notation zip := (zip_with pair).

(** ** Booleans *)
(** The following coercion allows us to use Booleans as propositions. *)
Coercion Is_true : bool >-> Sortclass.
Tej Chajed's avatar
Tej Chajed committed
555 556 557
Hint Unfold Is_true : core.
Hint Immediate Is_true_eq_left : core.
Hint Resolve orb_prop_intro andb_prop_intro : core.
558 559 560 561 562 563
Notation "(&&)" := andb (only parsing).
Notation "(||)" := orb (only parsing).
Infix "&&*" := (zip_with (&&)) (at level 40).
Infix "||*" := (zip_with (||)) (at level 50).

Instance bool_inhabated : Inhabited bool := populate true.
564

565 566 567 568 569
Definition bool_le (β1 β2 : bool) : Prop := negb β1 || β2.
Infix "=.>" := bool_le (at level 70).
Infix "=.>*" := (Forall2 bool_le) (at level 70).
Instance: PartialOrder bool_le.
Proof. repeat split; repeat intros [|]; compute; tauto. Qed.
570

571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578
Lemma andb_True b1 b2 : b1 && b2  b1  b2.
Proof. destruct b1, b2; simpl; tauto. Qed.
Lemma orb_True b1 b2 : b1 || b2  b1  b2.
Proof. destruct b1, b2; simpl; tauto. Qed.
Lemma negb_True b : negb b  ¬b.
Proof. destruct b; simpl; tauto. Qed.
Lemma Is_true_false (b : bool) : b = false  ¬b.
Proof. now intros -> ?. Qed.
579

580 581
(** ** Unit *)
Instance unit_equiv : Equiv unit := λ _ _, True.
582
Instance unit_equivalence : Equivalence (@{unit}).
583
Proof. repeat split. Qed.
584 585
Instance unit_leibniz : LeibnizEquiv unit.
Proof. intros [] []; reflexivity. Qed.
586
Instance unit_inhabited: Inhabited unit := populate ().
587

588
(** ** Products *)
589 590
Notation "( x ,)" := (pair x) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(, y )" := (λ x, (x,y)) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
591

592 593
Notation "p .1" := (fst p) (at level 2, left associativity, format "p .1").
Notation "p .2" := (snd p) (at level 2, left associativity, format "p .2").
594

595 596 597
Instance: Params (@pair) 2 := {}.
Instance: Params (@fst) 2 := {}.
Instance: Params (@snd) 2 := {}.
598

599 600 601 602 603 604 605
Notation curry := prod_curry.
Notation uncurry := prod_uncurry.
Definition curry3 {A B C D} (f : A  B  C  D) (p : A * B * C) : D :=
  let '(a,b,c) := p in f a b c.
Definition curry4 {A B C D E} (f : A  B  C  D  E) (p : A * B * C * D) : E :=
  let '(a,b,c,d) := p in f a b c d.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
606 607 608 609 610
Definition uncurry3 {A B C D} (f : A * B * C  D) (a : A) (b : B) (c : C) : D :=
  f (a, b, c).
Definition uncurry4 {A B C D E} (f : A * B * C * D  E)
  (a : A) (b : B) (c : C) (d : D) : E := f (a, b, c, d).

611 612
Definition prod_map {A A' B B'} (f: A  A') (g: B  B') (p : A * B) : A' * B' :=
  (f (p.1), g (p.2)).
613
Arguments prod_map {_ _ _ _} _ _ !_ / : assert.
614

615 616
Definition prod_zip {A A' A'' B B' B''} (f : A  A'  A'') (g : B  B'  B'')
    (p : A * B) (q : A' * B') : A'' * B'' := (f (p.1) (q.1), g (p.2) (q.2)).
617
Arguments prod_zip {_ _ _ _ _ _} _ _ !_ !_ / : assert.
618

619 620 621
Instance prod_inhabited {A B} (iA : Inhabited A)
    (iB : Inhabited B) : Inhabited (A * B) :=
  match iA, iB with populate x, populate y => populate (x,y) end.
622

623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630
Instance pair_inj : Inj2 (=) (=) (=) (@pair A B).
Proof. injection 1; auto. Qed.
Instance prod_map_inj {A A' B B'} (f : A  A') (g : B  B') :
  Inj (=) (=) f  Inj (=) (=) g  Inj (=) (=) (prod_map f g).
Proof.
  intros ?? [??] [??] ?; simpl in *; f_equal;
    [apply (inj f)|apply (inj g)]; congruence.
Qed.
631

632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647
Definition prod_relation {A B} (R1 : relation A) (R2 : relation B) :
  relation (A * B) := λ x y, R1 (x.1) (y.1)  R2 (x.2) (y.2).
Section prod_relation.
  Context `{R1 : relation A, R2 : relation B}.
  Global Instance prod_relation_refl :
    Reflexive R1  Reflexive R2  Reflexive (prod_relation R1 R2).
  Proof. firstorder eauto. Qed.
  Global Instance prod_relation_sym :
    Symmetric R1  Symmetric R2  Symmetric (prod_relation R1 R2).
  Proof. firstorder eauto. Qed.
  Global Instance prod_relation_trans :
    Transitive R1  Transitive R2  Transitive (prod_relation R1 R2).
  Proof. firstorder eauto. Qed.
  Global Instance prod_relation_equiv :
    Equivalence R1  Equivalence R2  Equivalence (prod_relation R1 R2).
  Proof. split; apply _. Qed.
648

649 650
  Global Instance pair_proper' : Proper (R1 ==> R2 ==> prod_relation R1 R2) pair.
  Proof. firstorder eauto. Qed.
651 652
  Global Instance pair_inj' : Inj2 R1 R2 (prod_relation R1 R2) pair.
  Proof. inversion_clear 1; eauto. Qed.
653 654 655 656 657
  Global Instance fst_proper' : Proper (prod_relation R1 R2 ==> R1) fst.
  Proof. firstorder eauto. Qed.
  Global Instance snd_proper' : Proper (prod_relation R1 R2 ==> R2) snd.
  Proof. firstorder eauto. Qed.
End prod_relation.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
658

659 660
Instance prod_equiv `{Equiv A,Equiv B} : Equiv (A * B) := prod_relation () ().
Instance pair_proper `{Equiv A, Equiv B} :
661 662
  Proper (() ==> () ==> ()) (@pair A B) := _.
Instance pair_equiv_inj `{Equiv A, Equiv B} : Inj2 () () () (@pair A B) := _.
663 664 665
Instance fst_proper `{Equiv A, Equiv B} : Proper (() ==> ()) (@fst A B) := _.
Instance snd_proper `{Equiv A, Equiv B} : Proper (() ==> ()) (@snd A B) := _.
Typeclasses Opaque prod_equiv.
666

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
667 668
Instance prod_leibniz `{LeibnizEquiv A, LeibnizEquiv B} : LeibnizEquiv (A * B).
Proof. intros [??] [??] [??]; f_equal; apply leibniz_equiv; auto. Qed.
669

670
(** ** Sums *)
671 672
Definition sum_map {A A' B B'} (f: A  A') (g: B  B') (xy : A + B) : A' + B' :=
  match xy with inl x => inl (f x) | inr y => inr (g y) end.
673
Arguments sum_map {_ _ _ _} _ _ !_ / : assert.
674

675
Instance sum_inhabited_l {A B} (iA : Inhabited A) : Inhabited (A + B) :=
676
  match iA with populate x => populate (inl x) end.
677
Instance sum_inhabited_r {A B} (iB : Inhabited A) : Inhabited (A + B) :=
678
  match iB with populate y => populate (inl y) end.
679

680 681 682 683
Instance inl_inj : Inj (=) (=) (@inl A B).
Proof. injection 1; auto. Qed.
Instance inr_inj : Inj (=) (=) (@inr A B).
Proof. injection 1; auto. Qed.
684

685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711
Instance sum_map_inj {A A' B B'} (f : A  A') (g : B  B') :
  Inj (=) (=) f  Inj (=) (=) g  Inj (=) (=) (sum_map f g).
Proof. intros ?? [?|?] [?|?] [=]; f_equal; apply (inj _); auto. Qed.

Inductive sum_relation {A B}
     (R1 : relation A) (R2 : relation B) : relation (A + B) :=
  | inl_related x1 x2 : R1 x1 x2  sum_relation R1 R2 (inl x1) (inl x2)
  | inr_related y1 y2 : R2 y1 y2  sum_relation R1 R2 (inr y1) (inr y2).

Section sum_relation.
  Context `{R1 : relation A, R2 : relation B}.
  Global Instance sum_relation_refl :
    Reflexive R1  Reflexive R2  Reflexive (sum_relation R1 R2).
  Proof. intros ?? [?|?]; constructor; reflexivity. Qed.
  Global Instance sum_relation_sym :
    Symmetric R1  Symmetric R2  Symmetric (sum_relation R1 R2).
  Proof. destruct 3; constructor; eauto. Qed.
  Global Instance sum_relation_trans :
    Transitive R1  Transitive R2  Transitive (sum_relation R1 R2).
  Proof. destruct 3; inversion_clear 1; constructor; eauto. Qed.
  Global Instance sum_relation_equiv :
    Equivalence R1  Equivalence R2  Equivalence (sum_relation R1 R2).
  Proof. split; apply _. Qed.
  Global Instance inl_proper' : Proper (R1 ==> sum_relation R1 R2) inl.
  Proof. constructor; auto. Qed.
  Global Instance inr_proper' : Proper (R2 ==> sum_relation R1 R2) inr.
  Proof. constructor; auto. Qed.
712 713 714 715
  Global Instance inl_inj' : Inj R1 (sum_relation R1 R2) inl.
  Proof. inversion_clear 1; auto. Qed.
  Global Instance inr_inj' : Inj R2 (sum_relation R1 R2) inr.
  Proof. inversion_clear 1; auto. Qed.
716 717 718 719 720
End sum_relation.

Instance sum_equiv `{Equiv A, Equiv B} : Equiv (A + B) := sum_relation () ().
Instance inl_proper `{Equiv A, Equiv B} : Proper (() ==> ()) (@inl A B) := _.
Instance inr_proper `{Equiv A, Equiv B} : Proper (() ==> ()) (@inr A B) := _.
721 722
Instance inl_equiv_inj `{Equiv A, Equiv B} : Inj () () (@inl A B) := _.
Instance inr_equiv_inj `{Equiv A, Equiv B} : Inj () () (@inr A B) := _.
723 724
Typeclasses Opaque sum_equiv.

725 726
(** ** Option *)
Instance option_inhabited {A} : Inhabited (option A) := populate None.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
727

728
(** ** Sigma types *)
729 730 731
Arguments existT {_ _} _ _ : assert.
Arguments projT1 {_ _} _ : assert.
Arguments projT2 {_ _} _ : assert.
732

733 734 735
Arguments exist {_} _ _ _ : assert.
Arguments proj1_sig {_ _} _ : assert.
Arguments proj2_sig {_ _} _ : assert.
736 737
Notation "x ↾ p" := (exist _ x p) (at level 20) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "` x" := (proj1_sig x) (at level 10, format "` x") : stdpp_scope.
738

739 740 741
Lemma proj1_sig_inj {A} (P : A  Prop) x (Px : P x) y (Py : P y) :
  xPx = yPy  x = y.
Proof. injection 1; trivial. Qed.
742

743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752
Section sig_map.
  Context `{P : A  Prop} `{Q : B  Prop} (f : A  B) (Hf :  x, P x  Q (f x)).
  Definition sig_map (x : sig P) : sig Q := f (`x)  Hf _ (proj2_sig x).
  Global Instance sig_map_inj:
    ( x, ProofIrrel (P x))  Inj (=) (=) f  Inj (=) (=) sig_map.
  Proof.
    intros ?? [x Hx] [y Hy]. injection 1. intros Hxy.
    apply (inj f) in Hxy; subst. rewrite (proof_irrel _ Hy). auto.
  Qed.
End sig_map.
753
Arguments sig_map _ _ _ _ _ _ !_ / : assert.
754

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
755

756
(** * Operations on sets *)
757
(** We define operational type classes for the traditional operations and
758
relations on sets: the empty set [∅], the union [(∪)],
759
intersection [(∩)], and difference [(∖)], the singleton [{[_]}], the subset
760
[(⊆)] and element of [(∈)] relation, and disjointess [(##)]. *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
761
Class Empty A := empty: A.
762
Hint Mode Empty ! : typeclass_instances.
763
Notation "∅" := empty (format "∅") : stdpp_scope.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
764

765 766
Instance empty_inhabited `(Empty A) : Inhabited A := populate .

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
767
Class Union A := union: A  A  A.
768
Hint Mode Union ! : typeclass_instances.
769
Instance: Params (@union) 2 := {}.
770 771 772 773 774 775
Infix "∪" := union (at level 50, left associativity) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(∪)" := union (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "( x ∪)" := (union x) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(∪ x )" := (λ y, union y x) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Infix "∪*" := (zip_with ()) (at level 50, left associativity) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(∪*)" := (zip_with ()) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
776
Infix "∪**" := (zip_with (zip_with ()))
777
  (at level 50, left associativity) : stdpp_scope.
778
Infix "∪*∪**" := (zip_with (prod_zip () (*)))
779
  (at level 50, left associativity) : stdpp_scope.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
780

781
Definition union_list `{Empty A} `{Union A} : list A  A := fold_right () .
782
Arguments union_list _ _ _ !_ / : assert.
783
Notation "⋃ l" := (union_list l) (at level 20, format "⋃  l") : stdpp_scope.
784

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
785
Class Intersection A := intersection: A  A  A.
786
Hint Mode Intersection ! : typeclass_instances.
787
Instance: Params (@intersection) 2 := {}.
788 789 790 791
Infix "∩" := intersection (at level 40) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(∩)" := intersection (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "( x ∩)" := (intersection x) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(∩ x )" := (λ y, intersection y x) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
792 793

Class Difference A := difference: A  A  A.
794
Hint Mode Difference ! : typeclass_instances.
795
Instance: Params (@difference) 2 := {}.
796 797 798 799 800 801
Infix "∖" := difference (at level 40, left associativity) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(∖)" := difference (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "( x ∖)" := (difference x) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(∖ x )" := (λ y, difference y x) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Infix "∖*" := (zip_with ()) (at level 40, left associativity) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(∖*)" := (zip_with ()) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
802
Infix "∖**" := (zip_with (zip_with ()))
803
  (at level 40, left associativity) : stdpp_scope.
804
Infix "∖*∖**" := (zip_with (prod_zip () (*)))
805
  (at level 50, left associativity) : stdpp_scope.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
806

807
Class Singleton A B := singleton: A  B.
808
Hint Mode Singleton - ! : typeclass_instances.
809
Instance: Params (@singleton) 3 := {}.
810
Notation "{[ x ]}" := (singleton x) (at level 1) : stdpp_scope.
811
Notation "{[ x ; y ; .. ; z ]}" :=
812
  (union .. (union (singleton x) (singleton y)) .. (singleton z))
813
  (at level 1) : stdpp_scope.
814
Notation "{[ x , y ]}" := (singleton (x,y))
815
  (at level 1, y at next level) : stdpp_scope.
816
Notation "{[ x , y , z ]}" := (singleton (x,y,z))
817
  (at level 1, y at next level, z at next level) : stdpp_scope.
818

819
Class SubsetEq A := subseteq: relation A.
820
Hint Mode SubsetEq ! : typeclass_instances.
821
Instance: Params (@subseteq) 2 := {}.
822 823 824 825 826 827 828 829
Infix "⊆" := subseteq (at level 70) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(⊆)" := subseteq (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "( X ⊆)" := (subseteq X) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(⊆ X )" := (λ Y, Y  X) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "X ⊈ Y" := (¬X  Y) (at level 70) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(⊈)" := (λ X Y, X  Y) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "( X ⊈)" := (λ Y, X  Y) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(⊈ X )" := (λ Y, Y  X) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
830 831 832 833

Infix "⊆@{ A }" := (@subseteq A _) (at level 70, only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(⊆@{ A } )" := (@subseteq A _) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.

834 835 836 837 838 839 840
Infix "⊆*" := (Forall2 ()) (at level 70) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(⊆*)" := (Forall2 ()) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Infix "⊆**" := (Forall2 (*)) (at level 70) : stdpp_scope.
Infix "⊆1*" := (Forall2 (λ p q, p.1  q.1)) (at level 70) : stdpp_scope.
Infix "⊆2*" := (Forall2 (λ p q, p.2  q.2)) (at level 70) : stdpp_scope.
Infix "⊆1**" := (Forall2 (λ p q, p.1 * q.1)) (at level 70) : stdpp_scope.
Infix "⊆2**" := (Forall2 (λ p q, p.2 * q.2)) (at level 70) : stdpp_scope.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
841

Tej Chajed's avatar
Tej Chajed committed
842 843 844
Hint Extern 0 (_  _) => reflexivity : core.
Hint Extern 0 (_ * _) => reflexivity : core.
Hint Extern 0 (_ ** _) => reflexivity : core.
845

846 847 848 849 850 851 852 853
Infix "⊂" := (strict ()) (at level 70) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(⊂)" := (strict ()) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "( X ⊂)" := (strict () X) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(⊂ X )" := (λ Y, Y  X) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "X ⊄ Y" := (¬X  Y) (at level 70) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(⊄)" := (λ X Y, X  Y) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "( X ⊄)" := (λ Y, X  Y) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(⊄ X )" := (λ Y, Y  X) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
854

855 856 857
Infix "⊂@{ A }" := (strict (@{A})) (at level 70, only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(⊂@{ A } )" := (strict (@{A})) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.

858 859 860 861
Notation "X ⊆ Y ⊆ Z" := (X  Y  Y  Z) (at level 70, Y at next level) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "X ⊆ Y ⊂ Z" := (X  Y  Y  Z) (at level 70, Y at next level) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "X ⊂ Y ⊆ Z" := (X  Y  Y  Z) (at level 70, Y at next level) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "X ⊂ Y ⊂ Z" := (X  Y  Y  Z) (at level 70, Y at next level) : stdpp_scope.
862

863 864 865 866
(** The class [Lexico A] is used for the lexicographic order on [A]. This order
is used to create finite maps, finite sets, etc, and is typically different from
the order [(⊆)]. *)
Class Lexico A := lexico: relation A.
867
Hint Mode Lexico ! : typeclass_instances.
868

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
869
Class ElemOf A B := elem_of: A  B  Prop.
870
Hint Mode ElemOf - ! : typeclass_instances.
871
Instance: Params (@elem_of) 3 := {}.
872 873 874 875 876 877 878 879
Infix "∈" := elem_of (at level 70) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(∈)" := elem_of (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation