fin_maps.v 98.8 KB
Newer Older
1
2
(** Finite maps associate data to keys. This file defines an interface for
finite maps and collects some theory on it. Most importantly, it proves useful
3
induction principles for finite maps and implements the tactic
4
[simplify_map_eq] to simplify goals involving finite maps. *)
5
From Coq Require Import Permutation.
6
From stdpp Require Export relations orders vector fin_sets.
7
8
(* FIXME: This file needs a 'Proof Using' hint, but the default we use
   everywhere makes for lots of extra ssumptions. *)
9

10
11
(** * Axiomatization of finite maps *)
(** We require Leibniz equality to be extensional on finite maps. This of
12
13
14
15
16
course limits the space of finite map implementations, but since we are mainly
interested in finite maps with numbers as indexes, we do not consider this to
be a serious limitation. The main application of finite maps is to implement
the memory, where extensionality of Leibniz equality is very important for a
convenient use in the assertions of our axiomatic semantics. *)
17

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
18
19
(** Finiteness is axiomatized by requiring that each map can be translated
to an association list. The translation to association lists is used to
20
prove well founded recursion on finite maps. *)
21

22
23
24
(** Finite map implementations are required to implement the [merge] function
which enables us to give a generic implementation of [union_with],
[intersection_with], and [difference_with]. *)
25

26
Class FinMapToList K A M := map_to_list: M  list (K * A).
27
28
Hint Mode FinMapToList ! - - : typeclass_instances.
Hint Mode FinMapToList - - ! : typeclass_instances.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
29

30
31
Class FinMap K M `{FMap M,  A, Lookup K A (M A),  A, Empty (M A),  A,
    PartialAlter K A (M A), OMap M, Merge M,  A, FinMapToList K A (M A),
32
    EqDecision K} := {
33
34
  map_eq {A} (m1 m2 : M A) : ( i, m1 !! i = m2 !! i)  m1 = m2;
  lookup_empty {A} i : ( : M A) !! i = None;
35
36
37
38
  lookup_partial_alter {A} f (m : M A) i :
    partial_alter f i m !! i = f (m !! i);
  lookup_partial_alter_ne {A} f (m : M A) i j :
    i  j  partial_alter f i m !! j = m !! j;
39
  lookup_fmap {A B} (f : A  B) (m : M A) i : (f <$> m) !! i = f <$> m !! i;
40
  NoDup_map_to_list {A} (m : M A) : NoDup (map_to_list m);
41
42
  elem_of_map_to_list {A} (m : M A) i x :
    (i,x)  map_to_list m  m !! i = Some x;
43
44
45
46
  lookup_omap {A B} (f : A  option B) (m : M A) i :
    omap f m !! i = m !! i = f; 
  lookup_merge {A B C} (f : option A  option B  option C)
      `{!DiagNone f} (m1 : M A) (m2 : M B) i :
47
    merge f m1 m2 !! i = f (m1 !! i) (m2 !! i)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
48
49
}.

50
51
52
(** * Derived operations *)
(** All of the following functions are defined in a generic way for arbitrary
finite map implementations. These generic implementations do not cause a
53
54
significant performance loss, which justifies including them in the finite map
interface as primitive operations. *)
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
Instance map_insert `{PartialAlter K A M} : Insert K A M :=
  λ i x, partial_alter (λ _, Some x) i.
Instance map_alter `{PartialAlter K A M} : Alter K A M :=
  λ f, partial_alter (fmap f).
Instance map_delete `{PartialAlter K A M} : Delete K M :=
  partial_alter (λ _, None).
Instance map_singleton `{PartialAlter K A M, Empty M} :
  SingletonM K A M := λ i x, <[i:=x]> .

64
Definition list_to_map `{Insert K A M, Empty M} : list (K * A)  M :=
65
  fold_right (λ p, <[p.1:=p.2]>) .
66

67
68
Instance map_size `{FinMapToList K A M} : Size M := λ m, length (map_to_list m).

69
Definition map_to_set `{FinMapToList K A M,
70
    Singleton B C, Empty C, Union C} (f : K  A  B) (m : M) : C :=
71
72
  list_to_set (curry f <$> map_to_list m).
Definition set_to_map `{Elements B C, Insert K A M, Empty M}
73
    (f : B  K * A) (X : C) : M :=
74
  list_to_map (f <$> elements X).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
75

76
77
78
79
80
81
Instance map_union_with `{Merge M} {A} : UnionWith A (M A) :=
  λ f, merge (union_with f).
Instance map_intersection_with `{Merge M} {A} : IntersectionWith A (M A) :=
  λ f, merge (intersection_with f).
Instance map_difference_with `{Merge M} {A} : DifferenceWith A (M A) :=
  λ f, merge (difference_with f).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
82

83
84
85
(** Higher precedence to make sure it's not used for other types with a [Lookup]
instance, such as lists. *)
Instance map_equiv `{ A, Lookup K A (M A), Equiv A} : Equiv (M A) | 20 :=
86
  λ m1 m2,  i, m1 !! i  m2 !! i.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
87

88
Definition map_Forall `{Lookup K A M} (P : K  A  Prop) : M  Prop :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
89
  λ m,  i x, m !! i = Some x  P i x.
Ralf Jung's avatar
Ralf Jung committed
90

91
Definition map_relation `{ A, Lookup K A (M A)} {A B} (R : A  B  Prop)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
92
93
    (P : A  Prop) (Q : B  Prop) (m1 : M A) (m2 : M B) : Prop :=  i,
  option_relation R P Q (m1 !! i) (m2 !! i).
94
Definition map_included `{ A, Lookup K A (M A)} {A}
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
95
  (R : relation A) : relation (M A) := map_relation R (λ _, False) (λ _, True).
96
Definition map_disjoint `{ A, Lookup K A (M A)} {A} : relation (M A) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
97
  map_relation (λ _ _, False) (λ _, True) (λ _, True).
98
Infix "##ₘ" := map_disjoint (at level 70) : stdpp_scope.
Tej Chajed's avatar
Tej Chajed committed
99
Hint Extern 0 (_ ## _) => symmetry; eassumption : core.
100
101
Notation "( m ##ₘ.)" := (map_disjoint m) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
Notation "(.##ₘ m )" := (λ m2, m2 ## m) (only parsing) : stdpp_scope.
102
Instance map_subseteq `{ A, Lookup K A (M A)} {A} : SubsetEq (M A) :=
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
103
  map_included (=).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
104
105
106
107
108

(** The union of two finite maps only has a meaningful definition for maps
that are disjoint. However, as working with partial functions is inconvenient
in Coq, we define the union as a total function. In case both finite maps
have a value at the same index, we take the value of the first map. *)
109
Instance map_union `{Merge M} {A} : Union (M A) := union_with (λ x _, Some x).
110
111
112
Instance map_intersection `{Merge M} {A} : Intersection (M A) :=
  intersection_with (λ x _, Some x).

113
114
(** The difference operation removes all values from the first map whose
index contains a value in the second map as well. *)
115
Instance map_difference `{Merge M} {A} : Difference (M A) :=
116
  difference_with (λ _ _, None).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
117

118
119
(** A stronger variant of map that allows the mapped function to use the index
of the elements. Implemented by conversion to lists, so not very efficient. *)
120
121
Definition map_imap `{ A, Insert K A (M A),  A, Empty (M A),
     A, FinMapToList K A (M A)} {A B} (f : K  A  option B) (m : M A) : M B :=
122
  list_to_map (omap (λ ix, (fst ix ,.) <$> curry f ix) (map_to_list m)).
123

124
125
126
127
128
129
130
(* The zip operation on maps combines two maps key-wise. The keys of resulting
map correspond to the keys that are in both maps. *)
Definition map_zip_with `{Merge M} {A B C} (f : A  B  C) : M A  M B  M C :=
  merge (λ mx my,
    match mx, my with Some x, Some y => Some (f x y) | _, _ => None end).
Notation map_zip := (map_zip_with pair).

131
132
133
134
135
(* Folds a function [f] over a map. The order in which the function is called
is unspecified. *)
Definition map_fold `{FinMapToList K A M} {B}
  (f : K  A  B  B) (b : B) : M  B := foldr (curry f) b  map_to_list.

136
Instance map_filter `{FinMapToList K A M, Insert K A M, Empty M} : Filter (K * A) M :=
137
138
  λ P _, map_fold (λ k v m, if decide (P (k,v)) then <[k := v]>m else m) .

139
140
141
142
143
144
Fixpoint map_seq `{Insert nat A M, Empty M} (start : nat) (xs : list A) : M :=
  match xs with
  | [] => 
  | x :: xs => <[start:=x]> (map_seq (S start) xs)
  end.

Dan Frumin's avatar
Dan Frumin committed
145
146
147
148
Instance finmap_lookup_total `{!Lookup K A (M A), !Inhabited A} : LookupTotal K A (M A) | 20 :=
  λ i m, default inhabitant (m !! i).
Typeclasses Opaque finmap_lookup_total.

149
150
151
152
(** * Theorems *)
Section theorems.
Context `{FinMap K M}.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
153
154
(** ** Setoids *)
Section setoid.
155
  Context `{Equiv A}.
156

157
158
159
160
  Lemma map_equiv_lookup_l (m1 m2 : M A) i x :
    m1  m2  m1 !! i = Some x   y, m2 !! i = Some y  x  y.
  Proof. generalize (equiv_Some_inv_l (m1 !! i) (m2 !! i) x); naive_solver. Qed.

161
  Global Instance map_equivalence : Equivalence (@{A})  Equivalence (@{M A}).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
162
163
  Proof.
    split.
164
165
    - by intros m i.
    - by intros m1 m2 ? i.
166
    - by intros m1 m2 m3 ?? i; trans (m2 !! i).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
167
  Qed.
168
  Global Instance lookup_proper (i : K) : Proper ((@{M A}) ==> ()) (lookup i).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
169
  Proof. by intros m1 m2 Hm. Qed.
Dan Frumin's avatar
Dan Frumin committed
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
  Global Instance lookup_total_proper (i : K) `{!Inhabited A} :
    Proper (@{A}) inhabitant 
    Proper ((@{M A}) ==> ()) (lookup_total i).
  Proof.
    intros ? m1 m2 Hm. unfold lookup_total, finmap_lookup_total.
    apply from_option_proper; auto. by intros ??.
  Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
177
  Global Instance partial_alter_proper :
178
    Proper ((() ==> ()) ==> (=) ==> () ==> (@{M A})) partial_alter.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
179
180
181
182
183
184
  Proof.
    by intros f1 f2 Hf i ? <- m1 m2 Hm j; destruct (decide (i = j)) as [->|];
      rewrite ?lookup_partial_alter, ?lookup_partial_alter_ne by done;
      try apply Hf; apply lookup_proper.
  Qed.
  Global Instance insert_proper (i : K) :
185
    Proper (() ==> () ==> (@{M A})) (insert i).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
186
  Proof. by intros ???; apply partial_alter_proper; [constructor|]. Qed.
187
  Global Instance singleton_proper k : Proper (() ==> (@{M A})) (singletonM k).
188
189
190
191
  Proof.
    intros ???; apply insert_proper; [done|].
    intros ?. rewrite lookup_empty; constructor.
  Qed.
192
  Global Instance delete_proper (i : K) : Proper (() ==> (@{M A})) (delete i).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
193
194
  Proof. by apply partial_alter_proper; [constructor|]. Qed.
  Global Instance alter_proper :
195
    Proper ((() ==> ()) ==> (=) ==> () ==> (@{M A})) alter.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
196
197
198
199
  Proof.
    intros ?? Hf; apply partial_alter_proper.
    by destruct 1; constructor; apply Hf.
  Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
200
201
  Lemma merge_ext `{Equiv B, Equiv C} (f g : option A  option B  option C)
      `{!DiagNone f, !DiagNone g} :
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
202
    (() ==> () ==> ())%signature f g 
203
    (() ==> () ==> (@{M _}))%signature (merge f) (merge g).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
204
205
206
207
  Proof.
    by intros Hf ?? Hm1 ?? Hm2 i; rewrite !lookup_merge by done; apply Hf.
  Qed.
  Global Instance union_with_proper :
208
    Proper ((() ==> () ==> ()) ==> () ==> () ==>(@{M A})) union_with.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
209
210
211
  Proof.
    intros ?? Hf ?? Hm1 ?? Hm2 i; apply (merge_ext _ _); auto.
    by do 2 destruct 1; first [apply Hf | constructor].
212
  Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
213
  Global Instance map_leibniz `{!LeibnizEquiv A} : LeibnizEquiv (M A).
214
  Proof. intros m1 m2 Hm; apply map_eq; intros i. apply leibniz_equiv, Hm. Qed.
215
216
  Lemma map_equiv_empty (m : M A) : m    m = .
  Proof.
217
218
219
    split; [intros Hm; apply map_eq; intros i|intros ->].
    - generalize (Hm i). by rewrite lookup_empty, equiv_None.
    - intros ?. rewrite lookup_empty; constructor.
220
  Qed.
221
  Global Instance map_fmap_proper `{Equiv B} (f : A  B) :
222
    Proper (() ==> ()) f  Proper (() ==> (@{M _})) (fmap f).
223
224
225
  Proof.
    intros ? m m' ? k; rewrite !lookup_fmap. by apply option_fmap_proper.
  Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
  Global Instance map_zip_with_proper `{Equiv B, Equiv C} (f : A  B  C) :
    Proper (() ==> () ==> ()) f 
    Proper (() ==> () ==> ()) (map_zip_with (M:=M) f).
  Proof.
    intros Hf m1 m1' Hm1 m2 m2' Hm2. apply merge_ext; try done.
    destruct 1; destruct 1; repeat f_equiv; constructor || done.
  Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
233
234
235
End setoid.

(** ** General properties *)
236
237
238
239
240
Lemma map_eq_iff {A} (m1 m2 : M A) : m1 = m2   i, m1 !! i = m2 !! i.
Proof. split. by intros ->. apply map_eq. Qed.
Lemma map_subseteq_spec {A} (m1 m2 : M A) :
  m1  m2   i x, m1 !! i = Some x  m2 !! i = Some x.
Proof.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
241
  unfold subseteq, map_subseteq, map_relation. split; intros Hm i;
242
243
    specialize (Hm i); destruct (m1 !! i), (m2 !! i); naive_solver.
Qed.
244
Global Instance map_included_preorder {A} (R : relation A) :
245
  PreOrder R  PreOrder (map_included R : relation (M A)).
246
Proof.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
247
  split; [intros m i; by destruct (m !! i); simpl|].
248
  intros m1 m2 m3 Hm12 Hm23 i; specialize (Hm12 i); specialize (Hm23 i).
249
  destruct (m1 !! i), (m2 !! i), (m3 !! i); simplify_eq/=;
250
    done || etrans; eauto.
251
Qed.
252
Global Instance map_subseteq_po : PartialOrder (@{M A}).
253
Proof.
254
255
256
  split; [apply _|].
  intros m1 m2; rewrite !map_subseteq_spec.
  intros; apply map_eq; intros i; apply option_eq; naive_solver.
257
Qed.
Dan Frumin's avatar
Dan Frumin committed
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
Lemma lookup_total_alt `{!Inhabited A} (m : M A) i :
  m !!! i = default inhabitant (m !! i).
Proof. reflexivity. Qed.
Lemma lookup_total_correct `{!Inhabited A} (m : M A) i x :
  m !! i = Some x  m !!! i = x.
Proof. rewrite lookup_total_alt. by intros ->. Qed.
Lemma lookup_lookup_total `{!Inhabited A} (m : M A) i :
  is_Some (m !! i)  m !! i = Some (m !!! i).
Proof. intros [x Hx]. by rewrite (lookup_total_correct m i x). Qed.
267
268
Lemma lookup_weaken {A} (m1 m2 : M A) i x :
  m1 !! i = Some x  m1  m2  m2 !! i = Some x.
269
Proof. rewrite !map_subseteq_spec. auto. Qed.
270
271
272
273
274
275
Lemma lookup_weaken_is_Some {A} (m1 m2 : M A) i :
  is_Some (m1 !! i)  m1  m2  is_Some (m2 !! i).
Proof. inversion 1. eauto using lookup_weaken. Qed.
Lemma lookup_weaken_None {A} (m1 m2 : M A) i :
  m2 !! i = None  m1  m2  m1 !! i = None.
Proof.
276
277
  rewrite map_subseteq_spec, !eq_None_not_Some.
  intros Hm2 Hm [??]; destruct Hm2; eauto.
278
279
Qed.
Lemma lookup_weaken_inv {A} (m1 m2 : M A) i x y :
280
281
  m1 !! i = Some x  m1  m2  m2 !! i = Some y  x = y.
Proof. intros Hm1 ? Hm2. eapply lookup_weaken in Hm1; eauto. congruence. Qed.
282
283
284
285
286
287
Lemma lookup_ne {A} (m : M A) i j : m !! i  m !! j  i  j.
Proof. congruence. Qed.
Lemma map_empty {A} (m : M A) : ( i, m !! i = None)  m = .
Proof. intros Hm. apply map_eq. intros. by rewrite Hm, lookup_empty. Qed.
Lemma lookup_empty_is_Some {A} i : ¬is_Some (( : M A) !! i).
Proof. rewrite lookup_empty. by inversion 1. Qed.
288
Lemma lookup_empty_Some {A} i (x : A) : ¬( : M A) !! i = Some x.
289
290
Proof. by rewrite lookup_empty. Qed.
Lemma map_subset_empty {A} (m : M A) : m  .
291
292
293
Proof.
  intros [_ []]. rewrite map_subseteq_spec. intros ??. by rewrite lookup_empty.
Qed.
294
295
Lemma map_fmap_empty {A B} (f : A  B) : f <$> ( : M A) = .
Proof. by apply map_eq; intros i; rewrite lookup_fmap, !lookup_empty. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
296
297
298
299
300
Lemma map_fmap_empty_inv {A B} (f : A  B) m : f <$> m =   m = .
Proof.
  intros Hm. apply map_eq; intros i. generalize (f_equal (lookup i) Hm).
  by rewrite lookup_fmap, !lookup_empty, fmap_None.
Qed.
301

302
303
304
305
306
Lemma map_subset_alt {A} (m1 m2 : M A) :
  m1  m2  m1  m2   i, m1 !! i = None  is_Some (m2 !! i).
Proof.
  rewrite strict_spec_alt. split.
  - intros [? Heq]; split; [done|].
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
307
    destruct (decide (Exists (λ ix, m1 !! ix.1 = None) (map_to_list m2)))
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
      as [[[i x] [?%elem_of_map_to_list ?]]%Exists_exists
         |Hm%(not_Exists_Forall _)]; [eauto|].
    destruct Heq; apply (anti_symm _), map_subseteq_spec; [done|intros i x Hi].
    assert (is_Some (m1 !! i)) as [x' ?].
    { by apply not_eq_None_Some,
        (proj1 (Forall_forall _ _) Hm (i,x)), elem_of_map_to_list. }
    by rewrite <-(lookup_weaken_inv m1 m2 i x' x).
  - intros [? (i&?&x&?)]; split; [done|]. congruence.
Qed.

318
(** ** Properties of the [partial_alter] operation *)
319
320
321
Lemma partial_alter_ext {A} (f g : option A  option A) (m : M A) i :
  ( x, m !! i = x  f x = g x)  partial_alter f i m = partial_alter g i m.
Proof.
322
323
  intros. apply map_eq; intros j. by destruct (decide (i = j)) as [->|?];
    rewrite ?lookup_partial_alter, ?lookup_partial_alter_ne; auto.
324
325
Qed.
Lemma partial_alter_compose {A} f g (m : M A) i:
326
327
  partial_alter (f  g) i m = partial_alter f i (partial_alter g i m).
Proof.
328
329
  intros. apply map_eq. intros ii. by destruct (decide (i = ii)) as [->|?];
    rewrite ?lookup_partial_alter, ?lookup_partial_alter_ne.
330
Qed.
331
Lemma partial_alter_commute {A} f g (m : M A) i j :
332
  i  j  partial_alter f i (partial_alter g j m) =
333
334
    partial_alter g j (partial_alter f i m).
Proof.
335
336
337
338
  intros. apply map_eq; intros jj. destruct (decide (jj = j)) as [->|?].
  { by rewrite lookup_partial_alter_ne,
      !lookup_partial_alter, lookup_partial_alter_ne. }
  destruct (decide (jj = i)) as [->|?].
339
  - by rewrite lookup_partial_alter,
340
     !lookup_partial_alter_ne, lookup_partial_alter by congruence.
341
  - by rewrite !lookup_partial_alter_ne by congruence.
342
343
344
345
Qed.
Lemma partial_alter_self_alt {A} (m : M A) i x :
  x = m !! i  partial_alter (λ _, x) i m = m.
Proof.
346
347
  intros. apply map_eq. intros ii. by destruct (decide (i = ii)) as [->|];
    rewrite ?lookup_partial_alter, ?lookup_partial_alter_ne.
348
Qed.
349
Lemma partial_alter_self {A} (m : M A) i : partial_alter (λ _, m !! i) i m = m.
350
Proof. by apply partial_alter_self_alt. Qed.
351
Lemma partial_alter_subseteq {A} f (m : M A) i :
352
  m !! i = None  m  partial_alter f i m.
353
354
355
356
Proof.
  rewrite map_subseteq_spec. intros Hi j x Hj.
  rewrite lookup_partial_alter_ne; congruence.
Qed.
357
Lemma partial_alter_subset {A} f (m : M A) i :
358
  m !! i = None  is_Some (f (m !! i))  m  partial_alter f i m.
359
Proof.
360
361
  intros Hi Hfi. apply map_subset_alt; split; [by apply partial_alter_subseteq|].
  exists i. by rewrite lookup_partial_alter.
362
363
364
Qed.

(** ** Properties of the [alter] operation *)
365
Lemma lookup_alter {A} (f : A  A) (m : M A) i : alter f i m !! i = f <$> m !! i.
366
Proof. unfold alter. apply lookup_partial_alter. Qed.
367
368
Lemma lookup_alter_ne {A} (f : A  A) (m : M A) i j :
  i  j  alter f i m !! j = m !! j.
369
Proof. unfold alter. apply lookup_partial_alter_ne. Qed.
370
371
372
Lemma alter_ext {A} (f g : A  A) (m : M A) i :
  ( x, m !! i = Some x  f x = g x)  alter f i m = alter g i m.
Proof. intro. apply partial_alter_ext. intros [x|] ?; f_equal/=; auto. Qed.
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
Lemma alter_compose {A} (f g : A  A) (m : M A) i:
  alter (f  g) i m = alter f i (alter g i m).
Proof.
  unfold alter, map_alter. rewrite <-partial_alter_compose.
  apply partial_alter_ext. by intros [?|].
Qed.
Lemma alter_commute {A} (f g : A  A) (m : M A) i j :
  i  j  alter f i (alter g j m) = alter g j (alter f i m).
Proof. apply partial_alter_commute. Qed.
382
Lemma lookup_alter_Some {A} (f : A  A) (m : M A) i j y :
383
384
385
  alter f i m !! j = Some y 
    (i = j   x, m !! j = Some x  y = f x)  (i  j  m !! j = Some y).
Proof.
386
  destruct (decide (i = j)) as [->|?].
387
  - rewrite lookup_alter. naive_solver (simplify_option_eq; eauto).
388
  - rewrite lookup_alter_ne by done. naive_solver.
389
Qed.
390
Lemma lookup_alter_None {A} (f : A  A) (m : M A) i j :
391
392
  alter f i m !! j = None  m !! j = None.
Proof.
393
394
  by destruct (decide (i = j)) as [->|?];
    rewrite ?lookup_alter, ?fmap_None, ?lookup_alter_ne.
395
Qed.
396
Lemma lookup_alter_is_Some {A} (f : A  A) (m : M A) i j :
397
398
  is_Some (alter f i m !! j)  is_Some (m !! j).
Proof. by rewrite <-!not_eq_None_Some, lookup_alter_None. Qed.
399
Lemma alter_id {A} (f : A  A) (m : M A) i :
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
400
  ( x, m !! i = Some x  f x = x)  alter f i m = m.
401
Proof.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
402
  intros Hi; apply map_eq; intros j; destruct (decide (i = j)) as [->|?].
403
  { rewrite lookup_alter; destruct (m !! j); f_equal/=; auto. }
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
404
  by rewrite lookup_alter_ne by done.
405
Qed.
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
Lemma alter_mono {A} f (m1 m2 : M A) i : m1  m2  alter f i m1  alter f i m2.
Proof.
  rewrite !map_subseteq_spec. intros ? j x.
  rewrite !lookup_alter_Some. naive_solver.
Qed.
Lemma alter_strict_mono {A} f (m1 m2 : M A) i :
  m1  m2  alter f i m1  alter f i m2.
Proof.
  rewrite !map_subset_alt.
  intros [? (j&?&?)]; split; auto using alter_mono.
  exists j. by rewrite lookup_alter_None, lookup_alter_is_Some.
Qed.
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427

(** ** Properties of the [delete] operation *)
Lemma lookup_delete {A} (m : M A) i : delete i m !! i = None.
Proof. apply lookup_partial_alter. Qed.
Lemma lookup_delete_ne {A} (m : M A) i j : i  j  delete i m !! j = m !! j.
Proof. apply lookup_partial_alter_ne. Qed.
Lemma lookup_delete_Some {A} (m : M A) i j y :
  delete i m !! j = Some y  i  j  m !! j = Some y.
Proof.
  split.
428
  - destruct (decide (i = j)) as [->|?];
429
      rewrite ?lookup_delete, ?lookup_delete_ne; intuition congruence.
430
  - intros [??]. by rewrite lookup_delete_ne.
431
Qed.
432
433
434
Lemma lookup_delete_is_Some {A} (m : M A) i j :
  is_Some (delete i m !! j)  i  j  is_Some (m !! j).
Proof. unfold is_Some; setoid_rewrite lookup_delete_Some; naive_solver. Qed.
435
436
437
Lemma lookup_delete_None {A} (m : M A) i j :
  delete i m !! j = None  i = j  m !! j = None.
Proof.
438
439
  destruct (decide (i = j)) as [->|?];
    rewrite ?lookup_delete, ?lookup_delete_ne; tauto.
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
Qed.
Lemma delete_empty {A} i : delete i ( : M A) = .
Proof. rewrite <-(partial_alter_self ) at 2. by rewrite lookup_empty. Qed.
Lemma delete_commute {A} (m : M A) i j :
  delete i (delete j m) = delete j (delete i m).
Proof. destruct (decide (i = j)). by subst. by apply partial_alter_commute. Qed.
Lemma delete_insert_ne {A} (m : M A) i j x :
  i  j  delete i (<[j:=x]>m) = <[j:=x]>(delete i m).
Proof. intro. by apply partial_alter_commute. Qed.
449
Lemma delete_notin {A} (m : M A) i : m !! i = None  delete i m = m.
450
Proof.
451
452
  intros. apply map_eq. intros j. by destruct (decide (i = j)) as [->|?];
    rewrite ?lookup_delete, ?lookup_delete_ne.
453
Qed.
454
455
456
Lemma delete_idemp {A} (m : M A) i :
  delete i (delete i m) = delete i m.
Proof. by setoid_rewrite <-partial_alter_compose. Qed.
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
Lemma delete_partial_alter {A} (m : M A) i f :
  m !! i = None  delete i (partial_alter f i m) = m.
Proof.
  intros. unfold delete, map_delete. rewrite <-partial_alter_compose.
  unfold compose. by apply partial_alter_self_alt.
Qed.
Lemma delete_insert {A} (m : M A) i x :
  m !! i = None  delete i (<[i:=x]>m) = m.
Proof. apply delete_partial_alter. Qed.
466
467
468
Lemma delete_insert_delete {A} (m : M A) i x :
  delete i (<[i:=x]>m) = delete i m.
Proof. by setoid_rewrite <-partial_alter_compose. Qed.
469
470
Lemma insert_delete {A} (m : M A) i x : <[i:=x]>(delete i m) = <[i:=x]> m.
Proof. symmetry; apply (partial_alter_compose (λ _, Some x)). Qed.
471
Lemma delete_subseteq {A} (m : M A) i : delete i m  m.
472
473
474
Proof.
  rewrite !map_subseteq_spec. intros j x. rewrite lookup_delete_Some. tauto.
Qed.
475
Lemma delete_subset {A} (m : M A) i : is_Some (m !! i)  delete i m  m.
476
Proof.
477
478
  intros [x ?]; apply map_subset_alt; split; [apply delete_subseteq|].
  exists i. rewrite lookup_delete; eauto.
479
Qed.
480
Lemma delete_mono {A} (m1 m2 : M A) i : m1  m2  delete i m1  delete i m2.
481
Proof.
482
483
  rewrite !map_subseteq_spec. intros ? j x.
  rewrite !lookup_delete_Some. intuition eauto.
484
485
486
487
488
Qed.

(** ** Properties of the [insert] operation *)
Lemma lookup_insert {A} (m : M A) i x : <[i:=x]>m !! i = Some x.
Proof. unfold insert. apply lookup_partial_alter. Qed.
489
Lemma lookup_insert_rev {A}  (m : M A) i x y : <[i:=x]>m !! i = Some y  x = y.
490
Proof. rewrite lookup_insert. congruence. Qed.
491
Lemma lookup_insert_ne {A} (m : M A) i j x : i  j  <[i:=x]>m !! j = m !! j.
492
Proof. unfold insert. apply lookup_partial_alter_ne. Qed.
493
494
Lemma insert_insert {A} (m : M A) i x y : <[i:=x]>(<[i:=y]>m) = <[i:=x]>m.
Proof. unfold insert, map_insert. by rewrite <-partial_alter_compose. Qed.
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
Lemma insert_commute {A} (m : M A) i j x y :
  i  j  <[i:=x]>(<[j:=y]>m) = <[j:=y]>(<[i:=x]>m).
Proof. apply partial_alter_commute. Qed.
Lemma lookup_insert_Some {A} (m : M A) i j x y :
  <[i:=x]>m !! j = Some y  (i = j  x = y)  (i  j  m !! j = Some y).
Proof.
  split.
502
  - destruct (decide (i = j)) as [->|?];
503
      rewrite ?lookup_insert, ?lookup_insert_ne; intuition congruence.
504
  - intros [[-> ->]|[??]]; [apply lookup_insert|]. by rewrite lookup_insert_ne.
505
Qed.
506
507
508
Lemma lookup_insert_is_Some {A} (m : M A) i j x :
  is_Some (<[i:=x]>m !! j)  i = j  i  j  is_Some (m !! j).
Proof. unfold is_Some; setoid_rewrite lookup_insert_Some; naive_solver. Qed.
509
510
511
Lemma lookup_insert_is_Some' {A} (m : M A) i j x :
  is_Some (<[i:=x]>m !! j)  i = j  is_Some (m !! j).
Proof. rewrite lookup_insert_is_Some. destruct (decide (i=j)); naive_solver. Qed.
512
513
514
Lemma lookup_insert_None {A} (m : M A) i j x :
  <[i:=x]>m !! j = None  m !! j = None  i  j.
Proof.
515
516
517
  split; [|by intros [??]; rewrite lookup_insert_ne].
  destruct (decide (i = j)) as [->|];
    rewrite ?lookup_insert, ?lookup_insert_ne; intuition congruence.
518
Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
519
Lemma insert_id {A} (m : M A) i x : m !! i = Some x  <[i:=x]>m = m.
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
Proof.
  intros; apply map_eq; intros j; destruct (decide (i = j)) as [->|];
    by rewrite ?lookup_insert, ?lookup_insert_ne by done.
Qed.
Lemma insert_included {A} R `{!Reflexive R} (m : M A) i x :
  ( y, m !! i = Some y  R y x)  map_included R m (<[i:=x]>m).
Proof.
  intros ? j; destruct (decide (i = j)) as [->|].
528
529
  - rewrite lookup_insert. destruct (m !! j); simpl; eauto.
  - rewrite lookup_insert_ne by done. by destruct (m !! j); simpl.
530
Qed.
531
Lemma insert_empty {A} i (x : A) : <[i:=x]>( : M A) = {[i := x]}.
532
533
534
Proof. done. Qed.
Lemma insert_non_empty {A} (m : M A) i x : <[i:=x]>m  .
Proof.
535
  intros Hi%(f_equal (.!! i)). by rewrite lookup_insert, lookup_empty in Hi.
536
537
Qed.

538
Lemma insert_subseteq {A} (m : M A) i x : m !! i = None  m  <[i:=x]>m.
539
Proof. apply partial_alter_subseteq. Qed.
540
Lemma insert_subset {A} (m : M A) i x : m !! i = None  m  <[i:=x]>m.
541
Proof. intro. apply partial_alter_subset; eauto. Qed.
542
543
544
545
546
Lemma insert_mono {A} (m1 m2 : M A) i x : m1  m2  <[i:=x]> m1  <[i:=x]>m2.
Proof.
  rewrite !map_subseteq_spec.
  intros Hm j y. rewrite !lookup_insert_Some. naive_solver.
Qed.
547
Lemma insert_subseteq_r {A} (m1 m2 : M A) i x :
548
  m1 !! i = None  m1  m2  m1  <[i:=x]>m2.
549
Proof.
550
  intros. trans (<[i:=x]> m1); eauto using insert_subseteq, insert_mono.
551
Qed.
552

553
Lemma insert_delete_subseteq {A} (m1 m2 : M A) i x :
554
  m1 !! i = None  <[i:=x]> m1  m2  m1  delete i m2.
555
Proof.
556
557
558
559
  rewrite !map_subseteq_spec. intros Hi Hix j y Hj.
  destruct (decide (i = j)) as [->|]; [congruence|].
  rewrite lookup_delete_ne by done.
  apply Hix; by rewrite lookup_insert_ne by done.
560
561
Qed.
Lemma delete_insert_subseteq {A} (m1 m2 : M A) i x :
562
  m1 !! i = Some x  delete i m1  m2  m1  <[i:=x]> m2.
563
Proof.
564
565
  rewrite !map_subseteq_spec.
  intros Hix Hi j y Hj. destruct (decide (i = j)) as [->|?].
566
567
  - rewrite lookup_insert. congruence.
  - rewrite lookup_insert_ne by done. apply Hi. by rewrite lookup_delete_ne.
568
569
Qed.
Lemma insert_delete_subset {A} (m1 m2 : M A) i x :
570
  m1 !! i = None  <[i:=x]> m1  m2  m1  delete i m2.
571
Proof.
572
573
574
  intros ? [Hm12 Hm21]; split; [eauto using insert_delete_subseteq|].
  contradict Hm21. apply delete_insert_subseteq; auto.
  eapply lookup_weaken, Hm12. by rewrite lookup_insert.
575
576
Qed.
Lemma insert_subset_inv {A} (m1 m2 : M A) i x :
577
  m1 !! i = None  <[i:=x]> m1  m2 
578
579
   m2', m2 = <[i:=x]>m2'  m1  m2'  m2' !! i = None.
Proof.
580
  intros Hi Hm1m2. exists (delete i m2). split_and?.
581
582
  - rewrite insert_delete, insert_id. done.
    eapply lookup_weaken, strict_include; eauto. by rewrite lookup_insert.
583
584
  - eauto using insert_delete_subset.
  - by rewrite lookup_delete.
585
586
587
588
Qed.

(** ** Properties of the singleton maps *)
Lemma lookup_singleton_Some {A} i j (x y : A) :
589
  ({[i := x]} : M A) !! j = Some y  i = j  x = y.
590
Proof.
591
  rewrite <-insert_empty,lookup_insert_Some, lookup_empty; intuition congruence.
592
Qed.
593
594
Lemma lookup_singleton_None {A} i j (x : A) :
  ({[i := x]} : M A) !! j = None  i  j.
595
Proof. rewrite <-insert_empty,lookup_insert_None, lookup_empty; tauto. Qed.
596
Lemma lookup_singleton {A} i (x : A) : ({[i := x]} : M A) !! i = Some x.
597
Proof. by rewrite lookup_singleton_Some. Qed.
598
599
Lemma lookup_singleton_ne {A} i j (x : A) :
  i  j  ({[i := x]} : M A) !! j = None.
600
Proof. by rewrite lookup_singleton_None. Qed.
601
Lemma map_non_empty_singleton {A} i (x : A) : {[i := x]}  ( : M A).
602
Proof.
603
  intros Hix. apply (f_equal (.!! i)) in Hix.
604
605
  by rewrite lookup_empty, lookup_singleton in Hix.
Qed.
606
Lemma insert_singleton {A} i (x y : A) : <[i:=y]>({[i := x]} : M A) = {[i := y]}.
607
Proof.
608
  unfold singletonM, map_singleton, insert, map_insert.
609
610
  by rewrite <-partial_alter_compose.
Qed.
611
612
Lemma alter_singleton {A} (f : A  A) i x :
  alter f i ({[i := x]} : M A) = {[i := f x]}.
613
Proof.
614
  intros. apply map_eq. intros i'. destruct (decide (i = i')) as [->|?].
615
616
  - by rewrite lookup_alter, !lookup_singleton.
  - by rewrite lookup_alter_ne, !lookup_singleton_ne.
617
618
Qed.
Lemma alter_singleton_ne {A} (f : A  A) i j x :
619
  i  j  alter f i ({[j := x]} : M A) = {[j := x]}.
620
Proof.
621
622
  intros. apply map_eq; intros i'. by destruct (decide (i = i')) as [->|?];
    rewrite ?lookup_alter, ?lookup_singleton_ne, ?lookup_alter_ne by done.
623
Qed.
624
Lemma singleton_non_empty {A} i (x : A) : {[i:=x]}  ( : M A).
625
Proof. apply insert_non_empty. Qed.
626
Lemma delete_singleton {A} i (x : A) : delete i {[i := x]} = ( : M A).
627
Proof. setoid_rewrite <-partial_alter_compose. apply delete_empty. Qed.
628
Lemma delete_singleton_ne {A} i j (x : A) :
629
  i  j  delete i ({[j := x]} : M A) = {[j := x]}.
630
Proof. intro. apply delete_notin. by apply lookup_singleton_ne. Qed.
631

632
633
634
635
636
(** ** Properties of the map operations *)
Lemma fmap_empty {A B} (f : A  B) : f <$>  = .
Proof. apply map_empty; intros i. by rewrite lookup_fmap, lookup_empty. Qed.
Lemma omap_empty {A B} (f : A  option B) : omap f  = .
Proof. apply map_empty; intros i. by rewrite lookup_omap, lookup_empty. Qed.
637
638
639
Lemma fmap_insert {A B} (f: A  B) m i x: f <$> <[i:=x]>m = <[i:=f x]>(f <$> m).
Proof.
  apply map_eq; intros i'; destruct (decide (i' = i)) as [->|].
640
641
  - by rewrite lookup_fmap, !lookup_insert.
  - by rewrite lookup_fmap, !lookup_insert_ne, lookup_fmap by done.
642
Qed.
643
644
645
646
647
648
Lemma fmap_delete {A B} (f: A  B) m i: f <$> delete i m = delete i (f <$> m).
Proof.
  apply map_eq; intros i'; destruct (decide (i' = i)) as [->|].
  - by rewrite lookup_fmap, !lookup_delete.
  - by rewrite lookup_fmap, !lookup_delete_ne, lookup_fmap by done.
Qed.
649
650
651
652
Lemma omap_insert {A B} (f : A  option B) m i x y :
  f x = Some y  omap f (<[i:=x]>m) = <[i:=y]>(omap f m).
Proof.
  intros; apply map_eq; intros i'; destruct (decide (i' = i)) as [->|].
653
654
  - by rewrite lookup_omap, !lookup_insert.
  - by rewrite lookup_omap, !lookup_insert_ne, lookup_omap by done.
655
Qed.
656
Lemma map_fmap_singleton {A B} (f : A  B) i x : f <$> {[i := x]} = {[i := f x]}.
657
658
659
Proof.
  by unfold singletonM, map_singleton; rewrite fmap_insert, map_fmap_empty.
Qed.
660
Lemma omap_singleton {A B} (f : A  option B) i x y :
661
  f x = Some y  omap f {[ i := x ]} = {[ i := y ]}.
662
Proof.
663
664
  intros. unfold singletonM, map_singleton.
  by erewrite omap_insert, omap_empty by eauto.
665
Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
666
667
668
Lemma map_fmap_id {A} (m : M A) : id <$> m = m.
Proof. apply map_eq; intros i; by rewrite lookup_fmap, option_fmap_id. Qed.
Lemma map_fmap_compose {A B C} (f : A  B) (g : B  C) (m : M A) :
669
  g  f <$> m = g <$> (f <$> m).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
670
Proof. apply map_eq; intros i; by rewrite !lookup_fmap,option_fmap_compose. Qed.
671
Lemma map_fmap_equiv_ext {A} `{Equiv B} (f1 f2 : A  B) (m : M A) :
672
673
674
675
676
  ( i x, m !! i = Some x  f1 x  f2 x)  f1 <$> m  f2 <$> m.
Proof.
  intros Hi i; rewrite !lookup_fmap.
  destruct (m !! i) eqn:?; constructor; eauto.
Qed.
677
Lemma map_fmap_ext {A B} (f1 f2 : A  B) (m : M A) :
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
678
679
680
681
682
  ( i x, m !! i = Some x  f1 x = f2 x)  f1 <$> m = f2 <$> m.
Proof.
  intros Hi; apply map_eq; intros i; rewrite !lookup_fmap.
  by destruct (m !! i) eqn:?; simpl; erewrite ?Hi by eauto.
Qed.
683
Lemma omap_ext {A B} (f1 f2 : A  option B) (m : M A) :
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
684
685
686
687
688
  ( i x, m !! i = Some x  f1 x = f2 x)  omap f1 m = omap f2 m.
Proof.
  intros Hi; apply map_eq; intros i; rewrite !lookup_omap.
  by destruct (m !! i) eqn:?; simpl; erewrite ?Hi by eauto.
Qed.
689

690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
Lemma map_fmap_mono {A B} (f : A  B) (m1 m2 : M A) :
  m1  m2  f <$> m1  f <$> m2.
Proof.
  rewrite !map_subseteq_spec; intros Hm i x.
  rewrite !lookup_fmap, !fmap_Some. naive_solver.
Qed.
Lemma map_fmap_strict_mono {A B} (f : A  B) (m1 m2 : M A) :
  m1  m2  f <$> m1  f <$> m2.
Proof.
  rewrite !map_subset_alt.
  intros [? (j&?&?)]; split; auto using map_fmap_mono.
  exists j. by rewrite !lookup_fmap, fmap_None, fmap_is_Some.
Qed.
Lemma map_omap_mono {A B} (f : A  option B) (m1 m2 : M A) :
  m1  m2  omap f m1  omap f m2.
Proof.
  rewrite !map_subseteq_spec; intros Hm i x.
  rewrite !lookup_omap, !bind_Some. naive_solver.
Qed.