collections.v 44.1 KB
Newer Older
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
1
(* Copyright (c) 2012-2015, Robbert Krebbers. *)
2 3 4 5
(* This file is distributed under the terms of the BSD license. *)
(** This file collects definitions and theorems on collections. Most
importantly, it implements some tactics to automatically solve goals involving
collections. *)
6
From stdpp Require Export orders list.
7

8 9
Instance collection_equiv `{ElemOf A C} : Equiv C := λ X Y,
   x, x  X  x  Y.
10 11
Instance collection_subseteq `{ElemOf A C} : SubsetEq C := λ X Y,
   x, x  X  x  Y.
12 13 14
Instance collection_disjoint `{ElemOf A C} : Disjoint C := λ X Y,
   x, x  X  x  Y  False.
Typeclasses Opaque collection_equiv collection_subseteq collection_disjoint.
15

16 17
(** * Setoids *)
Section setoids_simple.
18
  Context `{SimpleCollection A C}.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
19

20
  Global Instance collection_equivalence: @Equivalence C ().
21
  Proof.
22 23 24 25
    split.
    - done.
    - intros X Y ? x. by symmetry.
    - intros X Y Z ?? x; by trans (x  Y).
26
  Qed.
27 28 29 30 31 32
  Global Instance singleton_proper : Proper ((=) ==> ()) (singleton (B:=C)).
  Proof. apply _. Qed.
  Global Instance elem_of_proper :
    Proper ((=) ==> () ==> iff) (@elem_of A C _) | 5.
  Proof. by intros x ? <- X Y. Qed.
  Global Instance disjoint_proper: Proper (() ==> () ==> iff) (@disjoint C _).
33
  Proof.
34
    intros X1 X2 HX Y1 Y2 HY; apply forall_proper; intros x. by rewrite HX, HY.
35
  Qed.
36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47
  Global Instance union_proper : Proper (() ==> () ==> ()) (@union C _).
  Proof. intros X1 X2 HX Y1 Y2 HY x. rewrite !elem_of_union. f_equiv; auto. Qed.
  Global Instance union_list_proper: Proper (() ==> ()) (union_list (A:=C)).
  Proof. by induction 1; simpl; try apply union_proper. Qed.
  Global Instance subseteq_proper : Proper (() ==> () ==> iff) (() : relation C).
  Proof.
    intros X1 X2 HX Y1 Y2 HY. apply forall_proper; intros x. by rewrite HX, HY.
  Qed.
End setoids_simple.

Section setoids.
  Context `{Collection A C}.
48

49 50 51
  (** * Setoids *)
  Global Instance intersection_proper :
    Proper (() ==> () ==> ()) (@intersection C _).
52
  Proof.
53
    intros X1 X2 HX Y1 Y2 HY x. by rewrite !elem_of_intersection, HX, HY.
54
  Qed.
55 56
  Global Instance difference_proper :
     Proper (() ==> () ==> ()) (@difference C _).
57
  Proof.
58
    intros X1 X2 HX Y1 Y2 HY x. by rewrite !elem_of_difference, HX, HY.
59
  Qed.
60
End setoids.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
61

62 63 64 65 66
Section setoids_monad.
  Context `{CollectionMonad M}.

  Global Instance collection_fmap_proper {A B} :
    Proper (pointwise_relation _ (=) ==> () ==> ()) (@fmap M _ A B).
67
  Proof.
68 69
    intros f1 f2 Hf X1 X2 HX x. rewrite !elem_of_fmap. f_equiv; intros z.
    by rewrite HX, Hf.
70
  Qed.
71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82
  Global Instance collection_bind_proper {A B} :
    Proper (((=) ==> ()) ==> () ==> ()) (@mbind M _ A B).
  Proof.
    intros f1 f2 Hf X1 X2 HX x. rewrite !elem_of_bind. f_equiv; intros z.
    by rewrite HX, (Hf z z).
  Qed.
  Global Instance collection_join_proper {A} :
    Proper (() ==> ()) (@mjoin M _ A).
  Proof.
    intros X1 X2 HX x. rewrite !elem_of_join. f_equiv; intros z. by rewrite HX.
  Qed.
End setoids_monad.
83

84 85 86 87 88
(** * Tactics *)
(** The tactic [set_unfold] transforms all occurrences of [(∪)], [(∩)], [(∖)],
[(<$>)], [∅], [{[_]}], [(≡)], and [(⊆)] into logically equivalent propositions
involving just [∈]. For example, [A → x ∈ X ∪ ∅] becomes [A → x ∈ X ∨ False].

89 90 91
This transformation is implemented using type classes instead of setoid
rewriting to ensure that we traverse each term at most once and to be able to
deal with occurences of the set operations under binders. *)
92 93 94 95 96 97 98
Class SetUnfold (P Q : Prop) := { set_unfold : P  Q }.
Arguments set_unfold _ _ {_}.
Hint Mode SetUnfold + - : typeclass_instances.

Class SetUnfoldSimpl (P Q : Prop) := { set_unfold_simpl : SetUnfold P Q }.
Hint Extern 0 (SetUnfoldSimpl _ _) => csimpl; constructor : typeclass_instances.

99
Instance set_unfold_default P : SetUnfold P P | 1000. done. Qed.
100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146
Definition set_unfold_1 `{SetUnfold P Q} : P  Q := proj1 (set_unfold P Q).
Definition set_unfold_2 `{SetUnfold P Q} : Q  P := proj2 (set_unfold P Q).

Lemma set_unfold_impl P Q P' Q' :
  SetUnfold P P'  SetUnfold Q Q'  SetUnfold (P  Q) (P'  Q').
Proof. constructor. by rewrite (set_unfold P P'), (set_unfold Q Q'). Qed.
Lemma set_unfold_and P Q P' Q' :
  SetUnfold P P'  SetUnfold Q Q'  SetUnfold (P  Q) (P'  Q').
Proof. constructor. by rewrite (set_unfold P P'), (set_unfold Q Q'). Qed.
Lemma set_unfold_or P Q P' Q' :
  SetUnfold P P'  SetUnfold Q Q'  SetUnfold (P  Q) (P'  Q').
Proof. constructor. by rewrite (set_unfold P P'), (set_unfold Q Q'). Qed.
Lemma set_unfold_iff P Q P' Q' :
  SetUnfold P P'  SetUnfold Q Q'  SetUnfold (P  Q) (P'  Q').
Proof. constructor. by rewrite (set_unfold P P'), (set_unfold Q Q'). Qed.
Lemma set_unfold_not P P' : SetUnfold P P'  SetUnfold (¬P) (¬P').
Proof. constructor. by rewrite (set_unfold P P'). Qed.
Lemma set_unfold_forall {A} (P P' : A  Prop) :
  ( x, SetUnfold (P x) (P' x))  SetUnfold ( x, P x) ( x, P' x).
Proof. constructor. naive_solver. Qed.
Lemma set_unfold_exist {A} (P P' : A  Prop) :
  ( x, SetUnfold (P x) (P' x))  SetUnfold ( x, P x) ( x, P' x).
Proof. constructor. naive_solver. Qed.

(* Avoid too eager application of the above instances (and thus too eager
unfolding of type class transparent definitions). *)
Hint Extern 0 (SetUnfold (_  _) _) =>
  class_apply set_unfold_impl : typeclass_instances.
Hint Extern 0 (SetUnfold (_  _) _) =>
  class_apply set_unfold_and : typeclass_instances.
Hint Extern 0 (SetUnfold (_  _) _) =>
  class_apply set_unfold_or : typeclass_instances.
Hint Extern 0 (SetUnfold (_  _) _) =>
  class_apply set_unfold_iff : typeclass_instances.
Hint Extern 0 (SetUnfold (¬ _) _) =>
  class_apply set_unfold_not : typeclass_instances.
Hint Extern 1 (SetUnfold ( _, _) _) =>
  class_apply set_unfold_forall : typeclass_instances.
Hint Extern 0 (SetUnfold ( _, _) _) =>
  class_apply set_unfold_exist : typeclass_instances.

Section set_unfold_simple.
  Context `{SimpleCollection A C}.
  Implicit Types x y : A.
  Implicit Types X Y : C.

  Global Instance set_unfold_empty x : SetUnfold (x  ) False.
147
  Proof. constructor. split. apply not_elem_of_empty. done. Qed.
148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160
  Global Instance set_unfold_singleton x y : SetUnfold (x  {[ y ]}) (x = y).
  Proof. constructor; apply elem_of_singleton. Qed.
  Global Instance set_unfold_union x X Y P Q :
    SetUnfold (x  X) P  SetUnfold (x  Y) Q  SetUnfold (x  X  Y) (P  Q).
  Proof.
    intros ??; constructor.
    by rewrite elem_of_union, (set_unfold (x  X) P), (set_unfold (x  Y) Q).
  Qed.
  Global Instance set_unfold_equiv_same X : SetUnfold (X  X) True | 1.
  Proof. done. Qed.
  Global Instance set_unfold_equiv_empty_l X (P : A  Prop) :
    ( x, SetUnfold (x  X) (P x))  SetUnfold (  X) ( x, ¬P x) | 5.
  Proof.
161 162
    intros ?; constructor. unfold equiv, collection_equiv.
    pose proof not_elem_of_empty; naive_solver.
163 164 165
  Qed.
  Global Instance set_unfold_equiv_empty_r (P : A  Prop) :
    ( x, SetUnfold (x  X) (P x))  SetUnfold (X  ) ( x, ¬P x) | 5.
166 167 168 169
  Proof.
    intros ?; constructor. unfold equiv, collection_equiv.
    pose proof not_elem_of_empty; naive_solver.
  Qed.
170 171 172
  Global Instance set_unfold_equiv (P Q : A  Prop) :
    ( x, SetUnfold (x  X) (P x))  ( x, SetUnfold (x  Y) (Q x)) 
    SetUnfold (X  Y) ( x, P x  Q x) | 10.
173
  Proof. constructor. apply forall_proper; naive_solver. Qed.
174 175 176
  Global Instance set_unfold_subseteq (P Q : A  Prop) :
    ( x, SetUnfold (x  X) (P x))  ( x, SetUnfold (x  Y) (Q x)) 
    SetUnfold (X  Y) ( x, P x  Q x).
177
  Proof. constructor. apply forall_proper; naive_solver. Qed.
178 179
  Global Instance set_unfold_subset (P Q : A  Prop) :
    ( x, SetUnfold (x  X) (P x))  ( x, SetUnfold (x  Y) (Q x)) 
180
    SetUnfold (X  Y) (( x, P x  Q x)  ¬∀ x, Q x  P x).
181
  Proof.
182 183
    constructor. unfold strict.
    repeat f_equiv; apply forall_proper; naive_solver.
184
  Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
185 186 187
  Global Instance set_unfold_disjoint (P Q : A  Prop) :
    ( x, SetUnfold (x  X) (P x))  ( x, SetUnfold (x  Y) (Q x)) 
    SetUnfold (X  Y) ( x, P x  Q x  False).
188
  Proof. constructor. unfold disjoint, collection_disjoint. naive_solver. Qed.
189 190 191 192 193 194

  Context `{!LeibnizEquiv C}.
  Global Instance set_unfold_equiv_same_L X : SetUnfold (X = X) True | 1.
  Proof. done. Qed.
  Global Instance set_unfold_equiv_empty_l_L X (P : A  Prop) :
    ( x, SetUnfold (x  X) (P x))  SetUnfold ( = X) ( x, ¬P x) | 5.
195
  Proof. constructor. unfold_leibniz. by apply set_unfold_equiv_empty_l. Qed.
196 197
  Global Instance set_unfold_equiv_empty_r_L (P : A  Prop) :
    ( x, SetUnfold (x  X) (P x))  SetUnfold (X = ) ( x, ¬P x) | 5.
198
  Proof. constructor. unfold_leibniz. by apply set_unfold_equiv_empty_r. Qed.
199 200 201
  Global Instance set_unfold_equiv_L (P Q : A  Prop) :
    ( x, SetUnfold (x  X) (P x))  ( x, SetUnfold (x  Y) (Q x)) 
    SetUnfold (X = Y) ( x, P x  Q x) | 10.
202
  Proof. constructor. unfold_leibniz. by apply set_unfold_equiv. Qed.
203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212
End set_unfold_simple.

Section set_unfold.
  Context `{Collection A C}.
  Implicit Types x y : A.
  Implicit Types X Y : C.

  Global Instance set_unfold_intersection x X Y P Q :
    SetUnfold (x  X) P  SetUnfold (x  Y) Q  SetUnfold (x  X  Y) (P  Q).
  Proof.
213 214
    intros ??; constructor. rewrite elem_of_intersection.
    by rewrite (set_unfold (x  X) P), (set_unfold (x  Y) Q).
215 216 217 218
  Qed.
  Global Instance set_unfold_difference x X Y P Q :
    SetUnfold (x  X) P  SetUnfold (x  Y) Q  SetUnfold (x  X  Y) (P  ¬Q).
  Proof.
219 220
    intros ??; constructor. rewrite elem_of_difference.
    by rewrite (set_unfold (x  X) P), (set_unfold (x  Y) Q).
221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251
  Qed.
End set_unfold.

Section set_unfold_monad.
  Context `{CollectionMonad M} {A : Type}.
  Implicit Types x y : A.

  Global Instance set_unfold_ret x y : SetUnfold (x  mret y) (x = y).
  Proof. constructor; apply elem_of_ret. Qed.
  Global Instance set_unfold_bind {B} (f : A  M B) X (P Q : A  Prop) :
    ( y, SetUnfold (y  X) (P y))  ( y, SetUnfold (x  f y) (Q y)) 
    SetUnfold (x  X = f) ( y, Q y  P y).
  Proof. constructor. rewrite elem_of_bind; naive_solver. Qed.
  Global Instance set_unfold_fmap {B} (f : A  B) X (P : A  Prop) :
    ( y, SetUnfold (y  X) (P y)) 
    SetUnfold (x  f <$> X) ( y, x = f y  P y).
  Proof. constructor. rewrite elem_of_fmap; naive_solver. Qed.
  Global Instance set_unfold_join (X : M (M A)) (P : M A  Prop) :
    ( Y, SetUnfold (Y  X) (P Y))  SetUnfold (x  mjoin X) ( Y, x  Y  P Y).
  Proof. constructor. rewrite elem_of_join; naive_solver. Qed.
End set_unfold_monad.

Ltac set_unfold :=
  let rec unfold_hyps :=
    try match goal with
    | H : _ |- _ =>
       apply set_unfold_1 in H; revert H;
       first [unfold_hyps; intros H | intros H; fail 1]
    end in
  apply set_unfold_2; unfold_hyps; csimpl in *.

252 253
(** Since [firstorder] already fails or loops on very small goals generated by
[set_solver], we use the [naive_solver] tactic as a substitute. *)
254
Tactic Notation "set_solver" "by" tactic3(tac) :=
255
  try fast_done;
256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268
  intros; setoid_subst;
  set_unfold;
  intros; setoid_subst;
  try match goal with |- _  _ => apply dec_stable end;
  naive_solver tac.
Tactic Notation "set_solver" "-" hyp_list(Hs) "by" tactic3(tac) :=
  clear Hs; set_solver by tac.
Tactic Notation "set_solver" "+" hyp_list(Hs) "by" tactic3(tac) :=
  clear -Hs; set_solver by tac.
Tactic Notation "set_solver" := set_solver by idtac.
Tactic Notation "set_solver" "-" hyp_list(Hs) := clear Hs; set_solver.
Tactic Notation "set_solver" "+" hyp_list(Hs) := clear -Hs; set_solver.

269 270 271 272
Hint Extern 1000 (_  _) => set_solver : set_solver.
Hint Extern 1000 (_  _) => set_solver : set_solver.
Hint Extern 1000 (_  _) => set_solver : set_solver.

273

274 275
(** * Collections with [∪], [∅] and [{[_]}] *)
Section simple_collection.
276
  Context `{SimpleCollection A C}.
277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341
  Implicit Types x y : A.
  Implicit Types X Y : C.
  Implicit Types Xs Ys : list C.

  (** Equality *)
  Lemma elem_of_equiv X Y : X  Y   x, x  X  x  Y.
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.
  Lemma collection_equiv_spec X Y : X  Y  X  Y  Y  X.
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.

  (** Subset relation *)
  Global Instance collection_subseteq_antisymm: AntiSymm () (() : relation C).
  Proof. intros ??. set_solver. Qed.

  Global Instance collection_subseteq_preorder: PreOrder (() : relation C).
  Proof. split. by intros ??. intros ???; set_solver. Qed.

  Lemma subseteq_union X Y : X  Y  X  Y  Y.
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.
  Lemma subseteq_union_1 X Y : X  Y  X  Y  Y.
  Proof. by rewrite subseteq_union. Qed.
  Lemma subseteq_union_2 X Y : X  Y  Y  X  Y.
  Proof. by rewrite subseteq_union. Qed.

  Lemma union_subseteq_l X Y : X  X  Y.
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.
  Lemma union_subseteq_r X Y : Y  X  Y.
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.
  Lemma union_least X Y Z : X  Z  Y  Z  X  Y  Z.
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.

  Lemma elem_of_subseteq X Y : X  Y   x, x  X  x  Y.
  Proof. done. Qed.
  Lemma elem_of_subset X Y : X  Y  ( x, x  X  x  Y)  ¬( x, x  Y  x  X).
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.

  (** Union *)
  Lemma not_elem_of_union x X Y : x  X  Y  x  X  x  Y.
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.
  Lemma elem_of_union_l x X Y : x  X  x  X  Y.
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.
  Lemma elem_of_union_r x X Y : x  Y  x  X  Y.
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.

  Lemma union_preserving_l X Y1 Y2 : Y1  Y2  X  Y1  X  Y2.
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.
  Lemma union_preserving_r X1 X2 Y : X1  X2  X1  Y  X2  Y.
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.
  Lemma union_preserving X1 X2 Y1 Y2 : X1  X2  Y1  Y2  X1  Y1  X2  Y2.
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.

  Global Instance union_idemp : IdemP (() : relation C) ().
  Proof. intros X. set_solver. Qed.
  Global Instance union_empty_l : LeftId (() : relation C)  ().
  Proof. intros X. set_solver. Qed.
  Global Instance union_empty_r : RightId (() : relation C)  ().
  Proof. intros X. set_solver. Qed.
  Global Instance union_comm : Comm (() : relation C) ().
  Proof. intros X Y. set_solver. Qed.
  Global Instance union_assoc : Assoc (() : relation C) ().
  Proof. intros X Y Z. set_solver. Qed.

  Lemma empty_union X Y : X  Y    X    Y  .
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
342 343 344 345 346
  Lemma union_cancel_l X Y Z : Z  X  Z  Y  Z  X  Z  Y  X  Y.
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.
  Lemma union_cancel_r X Y Z : X  Z  Y  Z  X  Z  Y  Z  X  Y.
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.

347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393
  (** Empty *)
  Lemma elem_of_equiv_empty X : X     x, x  X.
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.
  Lemma elem_of_empty x : x    False.
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.
  Lemma equiv_empty X : X    X  .
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.
  Lemma union_positive_l X Y : X  Y    X  .
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.
  Lemma union_positive_l_alt X Y : X    X  Y  .
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.
  Lemma non_empty_inhabited x X : x  X  X  .
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.

  (** Singleton *)
  Lemma elem_of_singleton_1 x y : x  {[y]}  x = y.
  Proof. by rewrite elem_of_singleton. Qed.
  Lemma elem_of_singleton_2 x y : x = y  x  {[y]}.
  Proof. by rewrite elem_of_singleton. Qed.
  Lemma elem_of_subseteq_singleton x X : x  X  {[ x ]}  X.
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.
  Lemma non_empty_singleton x : ({[ x ]} : C)  .
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.
  Lemma not_elem_of_singleton x y : x  {[ y ]}  x  y.
  Proof. by rewrite elem_of_singleton. Qed.

  (** Disjointness *)
  Lemma elem_of_disjoint X Y : X  Y   x, x  X  x  Y  False.
  Proof. done. Qed.

  Global Instance disjoint_sym : Symmetric (@disjoint C _).
  Proof. intros X Y. set_solver. Qed.
  Lemma disjoint_empty_l Y :   Y.
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.
  Lemma disjoint_empty_r X : X  .
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.
  Lemma disjoint_singleton_l x Y : {[ x ]}  Y  x  Y.
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.
  Lemma disjoint_singleton_r y X : X  {[ y ]}  y  X.
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.
  Lemma disjoint_union_l X1 X2 Y : X1  X2  Y  X1  Y  X2  Y.
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.
  Lemma disjoint_union_r X Y1 Y2 : X  Y1  Y2  X  Y1  X  Y2.
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.

  (** Big unions *)
  Lemma elem_of_union_list Xs x : x   Xs   X, X  Xs  x  X.
394 395
  Proof.
    split.
396 397
    - induction Xs; simpl; intros HXs; [by apply elem_of_empty in HXs|].
      setoid_rewrite elem_of_cons. apply elem_of_union in HXs. naive_solver.
Ralf Jung's avatar
Ralf Jung committed
398
    - intros [X [Hx]]. induction Hx; simpl; [by apply elem_of_union_l |].
399
      intros. apply elem_of_union_r; auto.
400
  Qed.
401

402 403 404 405 406 407 408
  Lemma union_list_nil :  @nil C = .
  Proof. done. Qed.
  Lemma union_list_cons X Xs :  (X :: Xs) = X   Xs.
  Proof. done. Qed.
  Lemma union_list_singleton X :  [X]  X.
  Proof. simpl. by rewrite (right_id  _). Qed.
  Lemma union_list_app Xs1 Xs2 :  (Xs1 ++ Xs2)   Xs1   Xs2.
409
  Proof.
410 411
    induction Xs1 as [|X Xs1 IH]; simpl; [by rewrite (left_id  _)|].
    by rewrite IH, (assoc _).
412
  Qed.
413
  Lemma union_list_reverse Xs :  (reverse Xs)   Xs.
414
  Proof.
415 416 417
    induction Xs as [|X Xs IH]; simpl; [done |].
    by rewrite reverse_cons, union_list_app,
      union_list_singleton, (comm _), IH.
418
  Qed.
419 420 421
  Lemma union_list_preserving Xs Ys : Xs * Ys   Xs   Ys.
  Proof. induction 1; simpl; auto using union_preserving. Qed.
  Lemma empty_union_list Xs :  Xs    Forall ( ) Xs.
422
  Proof.
423 424 425
    split.
    - induction Xs; simpl; rewrite ?empty_union; intuition.
    - induction 1 as [|?? E1 ? E2]; simpl. done. by apply empty_union.
426
  Qed.
427

428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462
  Section leibniz.
    Context `{!LeibnizEquiv C}.

    Lemma elem_of_equiv_L X Y : X = Y   x, x  X  x  Y.
    Proof. unfold_leibniz. apply elem_of_equiv. Qed.
    Lemma collection_equiv_spec_L X Y : X = Y  X  Y  Y  X.
    Proof. unfold_leibniz. apply collection_equiv_spec. Qed.

    (** Subset relation *)
    Global Instance collection_subseteq_partialorder :
      PartialOrder (() : relation C).
    Proof. split. apply _. intros ??. unfold_leibniz. apply (anti_symm _). Qed.

    Lemma subseteq_union_L X Y : X  Y  X  Y = Y.
    Proof. unfold_leibniz. apply subseteq_union. Qed.
    Lemma subseteq_union_1_L X Y : X  Y  X  Y = Y.
    Proof. unfold_leibniz. apply subseteq_union_1. Qed.
    Lemma subseteq_union_2_L X Y : X  Y = Y  X  Y.
    Proof. unfold_leibniz. apply subseteq_union_2. Qed.

    (** Union *)
    Global Instance union_idemp_L : IdemP (@eq C) ().
    Proof. intros ?. unfold_leibniz. apply (idemp _). Qed.
    Global Instance union_empty_l_L : LeftId (@eq C)  ().
    Proof. intros ?. unfold_leibniz. apply (left_id _ _). Qed.
    Global Instance union_empty_r_L : RightId (@eq C)  ().
    Proof. intros ?. unfold_leibniz. apply (right_id _ _). Qed.
    Global Instance union_comm_L : Comm (@eq C) ().
    Proof. intros ??. unfold_leibniz. apply (comm _). Qed.
    Global Instance union_assoc_L : Assoc (@eq C) ().
    Proof. intros ???. unfold_leibniz. apply (assoc _). Qed.

    Lemma empty_union_L X Y : X  Y =   X =   Y = .
    Proof. unfold_leibniz. apply empty_union. Qed.

Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
463 464 465 466 467
    Lemma union_cancel_l_L X Y Z : Z  X  Z  Y  Z  X = Z  Y  X = Y.
    Proof. unfold_leibniz. apply union_cancel_l. Qed.
    Lemma union_cancel_r_L X Y Z : X  Z  Y  Z  X  Z = Y  Z  X = Y.
    Proof. unfold_leibniz. apply union_cancel_r. Qed.

468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520
    (** Empty *)
    Lemma elem_of_equiv_empty_L X : X =    x, x  X.
    Proof. unfold_leibniz. apply elem_of_equiv_empty. Qed.
    Lemma equiv_empty_L X : X    X = .
    Proof. unfold_leibniz. apply equiv_empty. Qed.
    Lemma union_positive_l_L X Y : X  Y =   X = .
    Proof. unfold_leibniz. apply union_positive_l. Qed.
    Lemma union_positive_l_alt_L X Y : X    X  Y  .
    Proof. unfold_leibniz. apply union_positive_l_alt. Qed.
    Lemma non_empty_inhabited_L x X : x  X  X  .
    Proof. unfold_leibniz. apply non_empty_inhabited. Qed.

    (** Singleton *)
    Lemma non_empty_singleton_L x : {[ x ]}  .
    Proof. unfold_leibniz. apply non_empty_singleton. Qed.

    (** Big unions *)
    Lemma union_list_singleton_L X :  [X] = X.
    Proof. unfold_leibniz. apply union_list_singleton. Qed.
    Lemma union_list_app_L Xs1 Xs2 :  (Xs1 ++ Xs2) =  Xs1   Xs2.
    Proof. unfold_leibniz. apply union_list_app. Qed.
    Lemma union_list_reverse_L Xs :  (reverse Xs) =  Xs.
    Proof. unfold_leibniz. apply union_list_reverse. Qed.
    Lemma empty_union_list_L Xs :  Xs =   Forall (= ) Xs.
    Proof. unfold_leibniz. by rewrite empty_union_list. Qed. 
  End leibniz.

  Section dec.
    Context `{ (X Y : C), Decision (X  Y)}.
    Lemma collection_subseteq_inv X Y : X  Y  X  Y  X  Y.
    Proof. destruct (decide (X  Y)); [by right|left;set_solver]. Qed.
    Lemma collection_not_subset_inv X Y : X  Y  X  Y  X  Y.
    Proof. destruct (decide (X  Y)); [by right|left;set_solver]. Qed.

    Lemma non_empty_union X Y : X  Y    X    Y  .
    Proof. rewrite empty_union. destruct (decide (X  )); intuition. Qed.
    Lemma non_empty_union_list Xs :  Xs    Exists ( ) Xs.
    Proof. rewrite empty_union_list. apply (not_Forall_Exists _). Qed.

    Context `{!LeibnizEquiv C}.
    Lemma collection_subseteq_inv_L X Y : X  Y  X  Y  X = Y.
    Proof. unfold_leibniz. apply collection_subseteq_inv. Qed.
    Lemma collection_not_subset_inv_L X Y : X  Y  X  Y  X = Y.
    Proof. unfold_leibniz. apply collection_not_subset_inv. Qed.
    Lemma non_empty_union_L X Y : X  Y    X    Y  .
    Proof. unfold_leibniz. apply non_empty_union. Qed.
    Lemma non_empty_union_list_L Xs :  Xs    Exists ( ) Xs.
    Proof. unfold_leibniz. apply non_empty_union_list. Qed.
  End dec.
End simple_collection.


(** * Collections with [∪], [∩], [∖], [∅] and [{[_]}] *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
521 522
Section collection.
  Context `{Collection A C}.
523
  Implicit Types X Y : C.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
524

525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545
  (** Intersection *)
  Lemma subseteq_intersection X Y : X  Y  X  Y  X.
  Proof. set_solver. Qed. 
  Lemma subseteq_intersection_1 X Y : X  Y  X  Y  X.
  Proof. apply subseteq_intersection. Qed.
  Lemma subseteq_intersection_2 X Y : X  Y  X  X  Y.
  Proof. apply subseteq_intersection. Qed.

  Lemma intersection_subseteq_l X Y : X  Y  X.
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.
  Lemma intersection_subseteq_r X Y : X  Y  Y.
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.
  Lemma intersection_greatest X Y Z : Z  X  Z  Y  Z  X  Y.
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.

  Lemma intersection_preserving_l X Y1 Y2 : Y1  Y2  X  Y1  X  Y2.
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.
  Lemma intersection_preserving_r X1 X2 Y : X1  X2  X1  Y  X2  Y.
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.
  Lemma intersection_preserving X1 X2 Y1 Y2 :
    X1  X2  Y1  Y2  X1  Y1  X2  Y2.
546
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.
547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558

  Global Instance intersection_idemp : IdemP (() : relation C) ().
  Proof. intros X; set_solver. Qed.
  Global Instance intersection_comm : Comm (() : relation C) ().
  Proof. intros X Y; set_solver. Qed.
  Global Instance intersection_assoc : Assoc (() : relation C) ().
  Proof. intros X Y Z; set_solver. Qed.
  Global Instance intersection_empty_l : LeftAbsorb (() : relation C)  ().
  Proof. intros X; set_solver. Qed.
  Global Instance intersection_empty_r: RightAbsorb (() : relation C)  ().
  Proof. intros X; set_solver. Qed.

559
  Lemma intersection_singletons x : ({[x]} : C)  {[x]}  {[x]}.
560
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.
561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571

  Lemma union_intersection_l X Y Z : X  (Y  Z)  (X  Y)  (X  Z).
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.
  Lemma union_intersection_r X Y Z : (X  Y)  Z  (X  Z)  (Y  Z).
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.
  Lemma intersection_union_l X Y Z : X  (Y  Z)  (X  Y)  (X  Z).
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.
  Lemma intersection_union_r X Y Z : (X  Y)  Z  (X  Z)  (Y  Z).
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.

  (** Difference *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
572
  Lemma difference_twice X Y : (X  Y)  Y  X  Y.
573
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.
574
  Lemma subseteq_empty_difference X Y : X  Y  X  Y  .
575
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
576
  Lemma difference_diag X : X  X  .
577
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
578
  Lemma difference_union_distr_l X Y Z : (X  Y)  Z  X  Z  Y  Z.
579
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
580
  Lemma difference_union_distr_r X Y Z : Z  (X  Y)  (Z  X)  (Z  Y).
581
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
582
  Lemma difference_intersection_distr_l X Y Z : (X  Y)  Z  X  Z  Y  Z.
583
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.
584
  Lemma difference_disjoint X Y : X  Y  X  Y  X.
585
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
586

587 588 589 590
  (** Disjointness *)
  Lemma disjoint_intersection X Y : X  Y  X  Y  .
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.

591 592
  Section leibniz.
    Context `{!LeibnizEquiv C}.
593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612

    (** Intersection *)
    Lemma subseteq_intersection_L X Y : X  Y  X  Y = X.
    Proof. unfold_leibniz. apply subseteq_intersection. Qed.
    Lemma subseteq_intersection_1_L X Y : X  Y  X  Y = X.
    Proof. unfold_leibniz. apply subseteq_intersection_1. Qed.
    Lemma subseteq_intersection_2_L X Y : X  Y = X  X  Y.
    Proof. unfold_leibniz. apply subseteq_intersection_2. Qed.

    Global Instance intersection_idemp_L : IdemP ((=) : relation C) ().
    Proof. intros ?. unfold_leibniz. apply (idemp _). Qed.
    Global Instance intersection_comm_L : Comm ((=) : relation C) ().
    Proof. intros ??. unfold_leibniz. apply (comm _). Qed.
    Global Instance intersection_assoc_L : Assoc ((=) : relation C) ().
    Proof. intros ???. unfold_leibniz. apply (assoc _). Qed.
    Global Instance intersection_empty_l_L: LeftAbsorb ((=) : relation C)  ().
    Proof. intros ?. unfold_leibniz. apply (left_absorb _ _). Qed.
    Global Instance intersection_empty_r_L: RightAbsorb ((=) : relation C)  ().
    Proof. intros ?. unfold_leibniz. apply (right_absorb _ _). Qed.

613 614
    Lemma intersection_singletons_L x : {[x]}  {[x]} = {[x]}.
    Proof. unfold_leibniz. apply intersection_singletons. Qed.
615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625

    Lemma union_intersection_l_L X Y Z : X  (Y  Z) = (X  Y)  (X  Z).
    Proof. unfold_leibniz; apply union_intersection_l. Qed.
    Lemma union_intersection_r_L X Y Z : (X  Y)  Z = (X  Z)  (Y  Z).
    Proof. unfold_leibniz; apply union_intersection_r. Qed.
    Lemma intersection_union_l_L X Y Z : X  (Y  Z)  (X  Y)  (X  Z).
    Proof. unfold_leibniz; apply intersection_union_l. Qed.
    Lemma intersection_union_r_L X Y Z : (X  Y)  Z  (X  Z)  (Y  Z).
    Proof. unfold_leibniz; apply intersection_union_r. Qed.

    (** Difference *)
626 627
    Lemma difference_twice_L X Y : (X  Y)  Y = X  Y.
    Proof. unfold_leibniz. apply difference_twice. Qed.
628 629
    Lemma subseteq_empty_difference_L X Y : X  Y  X  Y = .
    Proof. unfold_leibniz. apply subseteq_empty_difference. Qed.
630 631 632 633
    Lemma difference_diag_L X : X  X = .
    Proof. unfold_leibniz. apply difference_diag. Qed.
    Lemma difference_union_distr_l_L X Y Z : (X  Y)  Z = X  Z  Y  Z.
    Proof. unfold_leibniz. apply difference_union_distr_l. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
634 635
    Lemma difference_union_distr_r_L X Y Z : Z  (X  Y) = (Z  X)  (Z  Y).
    Proof. unfold_leibniz. apply difference_union_distr_r. Qed.
636 637 638
    Lemma difference_intersection_distr_l_L X Y Z :
      (X  Y)  Z = X  Z  Y  Z.
    Proof. unfold_leibniz. apply difference_intersection_distr_l. Qed.
639 640
    Lemma difference_disjoint_L X Y : X  Y  X  Y = X.
    Proof. unfold_leibniz. apply difference_disjoint. Qed.
641 642 643 644

    (** Disjointness *)
    Lemma disjoint_intersection_L X Y : X  Y  X  Y = .
    Proof. unfold_leibniz. apply disjoint_intersection. Qed.
645 646 647
  End leibniz.

  Section dec.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
648
    Context `{ (x : A) (X : C), Decision (x  X)}.
649
    Lemma not_elem_of_intersection x X Y : x  X  Y  x  X  x  Y.
650
    Proof. rewrite elem_of_intersection. destruct (decide (x  X)); tauto. Qed.
651
    Lemma not_elem_of_difference x X Y : x  X  Y  x  X  x  Y.
652
    Proof. rewrite elem_of_difference. destruct (decide (x  Y)); tauto. Qed.
653 654
    Lemma union_difference X Y : X  Y  Y  X  Y  X.
    Proof.
655
      intros ? x; split; rewrite !elem_of_union, elem_of_difference; [|intuition].
656
      destruct (decide (x  X)); intuition.
657
    Qed.
658 659 660 661 662
    Lemma subseteq_disjoint_union X Y : X  Y   Z, Y  X  Z  X  Z.
    Proof.
      split; [|set_solver].
      exists (Y  X); split; [auto using union_difference|set_solver].
    Qed.
663
    Lemma non_empty_difference X Y : X  Y  Y  X  .
664
    Proof. intros [HXY1 HXY2] Hdiff. destruct HXY2. set_solver. Qed.
665
    Lemma empty_difference_subseteq X Y : X  Y    X  Y.
666
    Proof. set_solver. Qed.
667

668 669 670 671 672
    Context `{!LeibnizEquiv C}.
    Lemma union_difference_L X Y : X  Y  Y = X  Y  X.
    Proof. unfold_leibniz. apply union_difference. Qed.
    Lemma non_empty_difference_L X Y : X  Y  Y  X  .
    Proof. unfold_leibniz. apply non_empty_difference. Qed.
673 674
    Lemma empty_difference_subseteq_L X Y : X  Y =   X  Y.
    Proof. unfold_leibniz. apply empty_difference_subseteq. Qed.
675 676
    Lemma subseteq_disjoint_union_L X Y : X  Y   Z, Y = X  Z  X  Z.
    Proof. unfold_leibniz. apply subseteq_disjoint_union. Qed.
677 678 679
  End dec.
End collection.

680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723

(** * Conversion of option and list *)
Definition of_option `{Singleton A C, Empty C} (mx : option A) : C :=
  match mx with None =>  | Some x => {[ x ]} end.
Fixpoint of_list `{Singleton A C, Empty C, Union C} (l : list A) : C :=
  match l with [] =>  | x :: l => {[ x ]}  of_list l end.

Section of_option_list.
  Context `{SimpleCollection A C}.
  Lemma elem_of_of_option (x : A) mx: x  of_option mx  mx = Some x.
  Proof. destruct mx; set_solver. Qed.
  Lemma elem_of_of_list (x : A) l : x  of_list l  x  l.
  Proof.
    split.
    - induction l; simpl; [by rewrite elem_of_empty|].
      rewrite elem_of_union,elem_of_singleton; intros [->|?]; constructor; auto.
    - induction 1; simpl; rewrite elem_of_union, elem_of_singleton; auto.
  Qed.
  Global Instance set_unfold_of_option (mx : option A) x :
    SetUnfold (x  of_option mx) (mx = Some x).
  Proof. constructor; apply elem_of_of_option. Qed.
  Global Instance set_unfold_of_list (l : list A) x P :
    SetUnfold (x  l) P  SetUnfold (x  of_list l) P.
  Proof. constructor. by rewrite elem_of_of_list, (set_unfold (x  l) P). Qed.
End of_option_list.

Section list_unfold.
  Context {A : Type}.
  Implicit Types x : A.
  Implicit Types l : list A.

  Global Instance set_unfold_nil x : SetUnfold (x  []) False.
  Proof. constructor; apply elem_of_nil. Qed.
  Global Instance set_unfold_cons x y l P :
    SetUnfold (x  l) P  SetUnfold (x  y :: l) (x = y  P).
  Proof. constructor. by rewrite elem_of_cons, (set_unfold (x  l) P). Qed.
  Global Instance set_unfold_app x l k P Q :
    SetUnfold (x  l) P  SetUnfold (x  k) Q  SetUnfold (x  l ++ k) (P  Q).
  Proof.
    intros ??; constructor.
    by rewrite elem_of_app, (set_unfold (x  l) P), (set_unfold (x  k) Q).
  Qed.
  Global Instance set_unfold_included l k (P Q : A  Prop) :
    ( x, SetUnfold (x  l) (P x))  ( x, SetUnfold (x  k) (Q x)) 
724 725
    SetUnfold (l  k) ( x, P x  Q x).
  Proof. by constructor; unfold subseteq, list_subseteq; set_unfold. Qed.
726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757
End list_unfold.


(** * Guard *)
Global Instance collection_guard `{CollectionMonad M} : MGuard M :=
  λ P dec A x, match dec with left H => x H | _ =>  end.

Section collection_monad_base.
  Context `{CollectionMonad M}.
  Lemma elem_of_guard `{Decision P} {A} (x : A) (X : M A) :
    x  guard P; X  P  x  X.
  Proof.
    unfold mguard, collection_guard; simpl; case_match;
      rewrite ?elem_of_empty; naive_solver.
  Qed.
  Lemma elem_of_guard_2 `{Decision P} {A} (x : A) (X : M A) :
    P  x  X  x  guard P; X.
  Proof. by rewrite elem_of_guard. Qed.
  Lemma guard_empty `{Decision P} {A} (X : M A) : guard P; X    ¬P  X  .
  Proof.
    rewrite !elem_of_equiv_empty; setoid_rewrite elem_of_guard.
    destruct (decide P); naive_solver.
  Qed.
  Global Instance set_unfold_guard `{Decision P} {A} (x : A) X Q :
    SetUnfold (x  X) Q  SetUnfold (x  guard P; X) (P  Q).
  Proof. constructor. by rewrite elem_of_guard, (set_unfold (x  X) Q). Qed.
  Lemma bind_empty {A B} (f : A  M B) X :
    X = f    X     x, x  X  f x  .
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.
End collection_monad_base.


758
(** * Quantifiers *)
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
759
Section quantifiers.
760
  Context `{SimpleCollection A B} (P : A  Prop).
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
761

762 763 764 765
  Definition set_Forall X :=  x, x  X  P x.
  Definition set_Exists X :=  x, x  X  P x.

  Lemma set_Forall_empty : set_Forall .
766
  Proof. unfold set_Forall. set_solver. Qed.
767
  Lemma set_Forall_singleton x : set_Forall {[ x ]}  P x.
768
  Proof. unfold set_Forall. set_solver. Qed.
769
  Lemma set_Forall_union X Y : set_Forall X  set_Forall Y  set_Forall (X  Y).
770
  Proof. unfold set_Forall. set_solver. Qed.
771
  Lemma set_Forall_union_inv_1 X Y : set_Forall (X  Y)  set_Forall X.
772
  Proof. unfold set_Forall. set_solver. Qed.
773
  Lemma set_Forall_union_inv_2 X Y : set_Forall (X  Y)  set_Forall Y.
774
  Proof. unfold set_Forall. set_solver. Qed.
775 776

  Lemma set_Exists_empty : ¬set_Exists .
777
  Proof. unfold set_Exists. set_solver. Qed.
778
  Lemma set_Exists_singleton x : set_Exists {[ x ]}  P x.
779
  Proof. unfold set_Exists. set_solver. Qed.
780
  Lemma set_Exists_union_1 X Y : set_Exists X  set_Exists (X  Y).
781
  Proof. unfold set_Exists. set_solver. Qed.
782
  Lemma set_Exists_union_2 X Y : set_Exists Y  set_Exists (X  Y).
783
  Proof. unfold set_Exists. set_solver. Qed.
784 785
  Lemma set_Exists_union_inv X Y :
    set_Exists (X  Y)  set_Exists X  set_Exists Y.
786
  Proof. unfold set_Exists. set_solver. Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
787 788
End quantifiers.

789
Section more_quantifiers.
790
  Context `{SimpleCollection A B}.
791

792 793 794 795 796 797
  Lemma set_Forall_weaken (P Q : A  Prop) (Hweaken :  x, P x  Q x) X :
    set_Forall P X  set_Forall Q X.
  Proof. unfold set_Forall. naive_solver. Qed.
  Lemma set_Exists_weaken (P Q : A  Prop) (Hweaken :  x, P x  Q x) X :
    set_Exists P X  set_Exists Q X.
  Proof. unfold set_Exists. naive_solver. Qed.
798 799
End more_quantifiers.

800 801 802
(** * Fresh elements *)
(** We collect some properties on the [fresh] operation. In particular we
generalize [fresh] to generate lists of fresh elements. *)
803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 811 812
Fixpoint fresh_list `{Fresh A C, Union C, Singleton A C}
    (n : nat) (X : C) : list A :=
  match n with
  | 0 => []
  | S n => let x := fresh X in x :: fresh_list n ({[ x ]}  X)
  end.
Inductive Forall_fresh `{ElemOf A C} (X : C) : list A  Prop :=
  | Forall_fresh_nil : Forall_fresh X []
  | Forall_fresh_cons x xs :
     x  xs  x  X  Forall_fresh X xs  Forall_fresh X (x :: xs).
813

814 815
Section fresh.
  Context `{FreshSpec A C}.
816
  Implicit Types X Y : C.
817

818
  Global Instance fresh_proper: Proper (() ==> (=)) (fresh (C:=C)).
819
  Proof. intros ???. by apply fresh_proper_alt, elem_of_equiv. Qed.
820 821
  Global Instance fresh_list_proper:
    Proper ((=) ==> () ==> (=)) (fresh_list (C:=C)).
822
  Proof.
823
    intros ? n ->. induction n as [|n IH]; intros ?? E; f_equal/=; [by rewrite E|].
824
    apply IH. by rewrite E.
825
  Qed.
826

827 828
  Lemma exist_fresh X :  x, x  X.
  Proof. exists (fresh X). apply is_fresh. Qed.
829 830 831 832
  Lemma Forall_fresh_NoDup X xs : Forall_fresh X xs  NoDup xs.
  Proof. induction 1; by constructor. Qed.
  Lemma Forall_fresh_elem_of X xs x : Forall_fresh X xs  x  xs  x  X.
  Proof.
833
    intros HX; revert x; rewrite <-Forall_forall. by induction HX; constructor.
834 835 836 837 838 839 840 841
  Qed.
  Lemma Forall_fresh_alt X xs :
    Forall_fresh X xs  NoDup xs   x, x  xs  x  X.
  Proof.
    split; eauto using Forall_fresh_NoDup, Forall_fresh_elem_of.
    rewrite <-Forall_forall.
    intros [Hxs Hxs']. induction Hxs; decompose_Forall_hyps; constructor; auto.
  Qed.
Robbert Krebbers's avatar
Robbert Krebbers committed
842 843
  Lemma Forall_fresh_subseteq X Y xs :
    Forall_fresh X xs  Y  X  Forall_fresh Y xs.
844
  Proof. rewrite !Forall_fresh_alt; set_solver. Qed.
845

846 847
  Lemma fresh_list_length n X : length (fresh_list n X) = n.
  Proof. revert X. induction n; simpl; auto. Qed.
848
  Lemma fresh_list_is_fresh n X x : x  fresh_list n X  x  X.
849
  Proof.
850
    revert X. induction n as [|n IH]; intros X; simpl;[by rewrite elem_of_nil|].
851
    rewrite elem_of_cons; intros [->| Hin]; [apply is_fresh|].
852
    apply IH in Hin; set_solver.
853
  Qed.
854
  Lemma NoDup_fresh_list n X : NoDup (fresh_list n X).
855
  Proof.
856
    revert X. induction n; simpl; constructor; auto.
857
    intros Hin; apply fresh_list_is_fresh in Hin; set_solver.
858 859 860 861
  Qed.
  Lemma Forall_fresh_list X n : Forall_fresh X (fresh_list n X).
  Proof.
    rewrite Forall_fresh_alt; eauto using NoDup_fresh_list, fresh_list_is_fresh.
862 863
  Qed.
End fresh.
864

865
(** * Properties of implementations of collections that form a monad *)
866 867 868
Section collection_monad.
  Context `{CollectionMonad M}.

869 870
  Global Instance collection_fmap_mono {A B} :
    Proper (pointwise_relation _ (=) ==> () ==> ()) (@fmap M _ A B).
871
  Proof. intros f g ? X Y ?; set_solver by eauto. Qed.
872 873
  Global Instance collection_bind_mono {A B} :
    Proper (((=) ==> ()) ==> () ==> ()) (@mbind M _ A B).
874
  Proof. unfold respectful; intros f g Hfg X Y ?; set_solver. Qed.
875 876
  Global Instance collection_join_mono {A} :
    Proper (() ==> ()) (@mjoin M _ A).
877
  Proof. intros X Y ?; set_solver. Qed.
878

879
  Lemma collection_bind_singleton {A B} (f : A  M B) x : {[ x ]} = f  f x.
880
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.
881
  Lemma collection_guard_True {A} `{Decision P} (X : M A) : P  guard P; X  X.
882
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.
883
  Lemma collection_fmap_compose {A B C} (f : A  B) (g : B  C) (X : M A) :
884
    g  f <$> X  g <$> (f <$> X).
885
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.
886 887
  Lemma elem_of_fmap_1 {A B} (f : A  B) (X : M A) (y : B) :
    y  f <$> X   x, y = f x  x  X.
888
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.
889 890
  Lemma elem_of_fmap_2 {A B} (f : A  B) (X : M A) (x : A) :
    x  X  f x  f <$> X.
891
  Proof. set_solver. Qed.
892 893
  Lemma elem_of_fmap_2_alt {A B} (f : A  B) (X : M A) (x : A) (y : B) :
    x  X  y = f x  y  f <$> X.
894
  Proof. set_solver<